Link: IQ and standard of living

http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2007/01/state-iq-and-standard-of-living.html

We need an update.

Take the data, Trump. Publish it. Far and wide.

The State already controls how you reproduce. It takes money from the barren to pay for another’s child.

Taking child support from a non-parent is illegal….?

OT

The biggest Dem weapon is the welfare cliff.

Global IQ drops

The pride of Christians replacing Natural Selection. You know better than God, right?

Fuck “mysterious ways”, sometimes you need to over-rule God’s will for feels!

And going into debt and producing unborn debt slaves to finance it, totally kosher!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_rob_Peter_to_pay_Paul

CHINOs hate Darwin because it shows their signalling is selfish, real Christians don’t really care. They aren’t pathological in their altruism so that theory is seen as obvious too.

If you look closely Jesus only fed believers who went on to be good people.

Now we don’t even have the Red Cross because they refused to take it bearing the symbol, it was changed locally to Red Crescent. If a beggar spat at your works, what would Jesus do?

People who hate the cross and all it stands for? BROTHER!

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/world_iq_going_down.html

h/t Anonymous Conservative

But dysgenics isn’t real, where’s the evidence?

Maybe one of the Horsemen is Bill Gates.

Don’t make the easy mistake. Don’t blame smart people for the decisions of stupid ones, place the blame where it belongs. As for blaming the women, well, how many are married? Who proposes? It takes two.

Europe is only responsible for Europe and we’re quite sustainable unlike – oh, literally EVERYONE ELSE.

Asia is a bigger pox on global IQ than Africa, if you crunch some numbers.

“My personal theory is that the drop in I.Q. is real and viral; that is, it is caused by an infection that is highly communicable through proximity.” HPV?

Genetic load would make sense if responsive to STDs.

Israel digs its own grave

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/hear-o-israel.html

You import people who hate you, you’re gonna have a bad time.

Guards lose to Mob. Ask the French King.

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/jewjitsu.html

yes!

The highest IQ of a century ago didn’t breed! How many kids did Einstein have? Three, married twice. To my knowledge, his line is gone now or very dilute. Kids of divorce don’t breed much either.

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/oy-vey-edge-slips-away.html

Edison, white, had many children. Two wives, no divorce. Six kids. His line is pretty much long gone too. Only one of those had kids. One out of six!

You could be full r and have a thousand kids. If they don’t reproduce past one or two generations, it’s over.

Low T = spatial ability

You don’t really hear men online look for data.

Why? They’re dumb enough to assume their opinion = fact.

In evobio, for example, if you actually look, women are likelier to be good at say, spatial intelligence.*

For foraging.

And remembering where they left the baby.

And obvious chick stuff like cave painting.

It’s simple enough to test.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1745699

The cognitive performance of normal men and women was studied, grouped according to whether the subjects had relatively high or low salivary testosterone (T) concentrations. Men with lower T performed better than other groups on measures of spatial/mathematical ability, tasks at which men normally excel. Women with high T scored higher than low-T women on these same measures. T concentrations did not relate significantly to scores on tests that usually favor women or that do not typically show a sex difference. These results support suggestions of a nonlinear relationship between T concentrations and spatial ability, and demonstrate some task specificity in this respect.

This explains STEM.

Naturally both sexes have an important place in the tribe. Only Americans would be dumb enough to assert otherwise. It’s the lone wolf myth. In biology, the lone wolf dies.

And men have no excuse to perform poorly on chick subjects.
It’s mostly productive personality traits like grit and conscientiousness. Basically, the only subject where your T levels matter is as a competitive athlete.

Meatheads can’t do maths. I find it funny they think they can calculate their own testosterone supplements (clue: more = better), much favoured is the Popeye to spinach approach.

“Why are there so many women in STEM?” they bitch.

Well, when it’s a blinded, fair test, they’re literally better at the material.
It’s meritocratic.

*Spatial should be studied separately from mathematical.
They are different types of intelligence.
It’s kinda like conflating a false equivalence of dancing and music composition.
Similar but very different.

Banned science

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/stop-talking-about-race-and-iq-take-it-from-someone-who-did.html

When it doesn’t go their way, it should be a forbidden topic.

It’ll come out eventually. You can’t ban biology. Evolution didn’t stop at the neck and the process is ongoing.

Social engineering is based on a fallacious attempt to view everything as Nurture. Nobody has ever been that dumb. An African can’t randomly give birth to an Asian. Genes exist and they code for many, many things. They don’t want to change their policies, although it would help all groups involved if it conformed better to reality.

“Every part of his argument is attacked: the validity of IQ, the claim that it’s substantially heritable, and the idea that races can be biologically distinguished.”

Attacking an argument (really, they mean shouting down the person) isn’t the same as refuting it.

IQ is the most and only valid construct in psychometrics/psychology. It is the most predictive of life outcomes by far. It has decades of evidence, spanning every society. It correlates to genes (behavioural genetics). GPA is a weaker form of IQ as a measure. IQ is entirely an academic measure, useful mostly within the college system. They cannot drop it.

Well over 50% by now, you’re out of date.

What is white? Why, Loki’s gambit and the continuum fallacy won’t get you out of this one. Genetic distance and archaeological diaspora traced over millennia. There are many ways you can test the individual too (cultural values, as mentioned recently, even sports they have an edge in).

You don’t see them refuting dog breeds.

They did want to drug everyone with oxytocin a short while ago because they thought it made people relax their in-group preference. However, it backfired massively when it turns out it makes people more patriotic. They need people atomized and unhappy, to be a globalist (universalist by value system).

Here’s fake news for you.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/oxytocin-could-be-antidote-racism-1634998

Oxytocin: Scientists discover antidote to racism

http://time.com/49399/oxytocin-racism-study/

Oxytocin Could Make You Racist

Yes, you can trust these people to fuck up everything eventually.
Suddenly their dependence on suicide pills makes complete sense. They cannot feel love.

Why mention Bell Curve, that hasn’t been updated in yonks?

They don’t want you to read A Troublesome Inheritance.

Update:

“steered around intelligence where, despite racial and ethnic gaps in test scores, no such pattern has been established.”

How does science get established if you don’t fund or publish the studies?

You need to look, argument from ignorance. #notanargument
https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/MCPH1
“May play a role in neurogenesis and regulation of the size of the cerebral cortex.”
http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q8NEM0
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/79648

Well, is there a racial difference? Could it be measured?
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/20/11050.full
“As a consequence, it has been impractical to obtain accurate thickness estimates for the entire cortex in individual subjects, or group statistics for patient or control populations. Here, we present an automated method for accurately measuring the thickness of the cerebral cortex across the entire brain and for generating cross-subject statistics in a coordinate system based on cortical anatomy.”
Yes.
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/articles/cortical_thickness.pdf

Difference? Yes.
http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Whole-Brain-Size-and-General-Mental-Ability-A-Review-2009-by-John-Philippe-Rushton-C.-Davison-Ankney.pdf
Is there geographic variation between “human populations”?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8064317_The_Race_Concept_in_Six_Regions_Variation_without_Consensus
Yes. They’re scared to label it.
You are wrong.

They could study it any time they like.

The liars are quite easy to spot e.g.

“inherited social advantage”

if it’s inherited, it isn’t social