Why are terrorist attacks so shocking to Westerners?

From the immigrants, specifically.

http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/Guest_right

I had to pick something you’ d actually read.

IRL section

It has been argued that in the Book of Genesis, the violation of hospitality is what truly made Sodom and Gomorrah considered to be wicked, resulting in God condemning everyone in the cities to die. In the narrative, God decides to destroy the cities but Abraham implores him to have mercy and spare the cities if even ten righteous people could be found there. God therefore sent two angels disguised as men to Sodom, who were refused hospitality by all until they encounter Abraham’s nephew Lot, who had recently moved to Sodom with his family. Lot welcomes the two as guests into his home, and eats with them at his table. A crowd of men from the city later gathers outside of Lot’s home and demands that he send the two strangers out of his house, “so that we might know them” (have sex with them). Lot is so horrified at their intentions that he even offers to let the crowd of men voluntarily have sex with his own virgin daughters rather than allow the two men who are his guests to be harmed.

That’s how serious it was.

The crowd refuses but the angels then reveal their true forms, strike the crowd blind, and warn Lot that he and his family must leave the city at once. Sodom and Gomorrah are destroyed at dawn by God raining down fire and brimstone from the heavens.

Refugees welcome?

SJWs do not protect them maternally, but based on hospitality.
Cut that bond and obligation, the defense is severed.

Going back to the last time this happened, why were we kind to the Jews before the end of WW2? Same reason. It’s the exact same reason.

Why are the Greeks such pushovers?

Many subsequent generations interpreted the story of Sodom and Gomorrah to be a condemnation of homosexual sex acts (to the point that “sodomy” became a common term for homosexual sex acts), but modern biblical scholars have pointed out that the inhabitants of Sodom are never explicitly condemned for engaging in homosexual sex. Rather, the crowd of men gathered outside Lot’s house did not horrify him simply because they wanted to engage in homosexual sex, but because they wanted to rape and harm guests within his own home, whom he had formally extended his protection over as part of guest right.

While other books of the bible (i.e. Leviticus) condemn homosexuality, the violation of the laws of hospitality is considered to be an infinitely worse transgression. The Midrash contains numerous commentaries and stories about the villainies of the Sodomites, not particularly focusing on homosexual sex but on their overall cruelty, including accounts of them horribly killing those who showed mercy to the poor.

This also explains the Celtic hesitance here to punish the violators.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitality#Celtic_cultures

Celtic societies also valued the concept of hospitality, especially in terms of protection. A host who granted a person’s request for refuge was expected not only to provide food and shelter for his/her guest, but to make sure they did not come to harm while under their care.

Except we granted them nothing, other immigrants in the system decided, and refuge is temporary.

reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2g87dd/was_there_an_equivalent_in_medieval_times_to/

Likewise, guests were to not abuse a host’s hospitality, but to behave honorably and appreciatively. There are many ancient Greek stories that hinge on violations of xenia. That is, in western culture today, it’s considered bad manners to treat your guest or host rudely, but it was a much more significant violation of the social code to behave in such a way in Ancient Greece. Actually, the same can be said in the Old Testament. 

Ancient etiquette, national honour.

Given the outcome of Sodom, am I concerned about mass immigration?

Not particularly, although I probably should move.

Examples: if you’ve read The Odyssey, you’ll see a huge component of the story is the Suitors living in Odysseus’s house, and taking advantage of his hospitality.

Tick tock.

about Lot

 (This passage is, in my opinion, meant humorously, but that element has been lost in time and in the desire of some to take the Bible literally).

Take my daughters!
translation
Nothing is sacred.

on GOT

 Ultimately, despite my love of GRRM and his work, it’s almost a sign of laziness to identify this as #basedonhistory. It’s not. It’s pirated from history and redressed as Ren’Fayre-bleak. The world relies so heavily on the audiences expectations how a ‘feudal society’ operates that it gets away with never having to explain anything at all.

Exactly, he doesn’t get the mind. He only writes bland, vacant nihilism – the angsty teen edition and the pomo Boomer who fucks and drinks and is really funny to himself/happy only when bitter and drunk.

Guest rights and rituals of hospitality existed across not only medieval Europe but across recorded time in history. Whether this is greeting an incomer by extending a hand in ‘friendship’ (or simply to show you’re not holding a weapon) to offering tea and biscuits to demonstrate to your daughter-in-law that you’re not going to bite her head off for daring to cross the threshold.

This could be considered our cardinal value as a race, the broader umbrella, white kind.

https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/events/hospitality-protection-and-refuge-in-early-english-law

Essentially, the rapefugees claim sanctuary then desecrate any form of right we gave them.
The term sexual terrorism applies, they violate beyond the physical to mock our culture.

This seminar places Anglo-Saxon (c.600-1100) legal treatments of refuge in the context of a broader web of ideas, looking at the problems that hospitality could raise by giving potentially threatening outsiders protection without simultaneously integrating them into local legal networks, and the various ways we find laws trying to address these problems without denying people’s right to protect their guests in principle.

Politeness is the pleasant parent of PC.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1893554392/qid=1143761279/sr=1-8/ref=sr_1_0_8/026-1234967-5390809

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2006/03/please_can_we_s.html

First, political correctness is a stern, fierce movement which is completely sane and sets out deliberately to stop us from saying – and thinking – various things. It is not a joke, nor is it out of control. It is deliberate, purposeful and serious. Those who enforce it plan to change the world and they will succeed for as long as we treat PC as a laugh, or as some sort of batty bureaucratic mix-up which will go away in the end.

Cultural Marxism would intersect here.

…We also need to realise that it has one very powerful weapon. It poses as the friend of good manners. It claims that it is the only force that can stop people being rude, dismissive or unpleasant to racial minorities or homosexuals. It pretends that it is the only movement that is interested in improving the lives of women

They want to disinherit us from our culture by handing it over to guests who want to water it down. We can’t move away but we try.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/why-is-totalitarianism-demanded-by.html

Totalitarianism is the natural end-point for modern, mainstream secular Leftism; and now that ‘everybody’ in The West is on the Left and primarily secular (including self-identified ‘right wingers’ and ‘Christians’) – ‘everybody’ is united in demanding totalitarian thought control.

In suppressing dissenting voices, it is their own thoughts that crave to be controlled. When life is understood as nothing but subjective feelings, then the idea is for our-selves to be manipulated into having the best feelings: we want to be convinced by soothing propaganda, we want a pleasing alternative reality…

Hence my contempt for the signalling right, the fakers.
They are blue pill as the rest. Cowards scurrying to hide badfeels.

from The tragedies of Euripides translated by R. Potter
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tragedies-Euripides-Translated-R-Potter/dp/1143759370

To be unwise with the unwise is painful. 

it continues

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ONIIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA307&lpg=PA307&dq=who+dares+not+speak+his+free+thoughts+is+a+slave

Full treatise here

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.co.uk/

Any time someone gives me shit for valuing freedom and being gobby about it As A Woman, I can’t help but wonder how fundamentally illiterate they are.

We only need defend ourselves when our men fail us.

Or is the fairer sex supposed to sit on our arses and pretend to agree with the rapists and their defenders? Isn’t that then a betrayal? A morally strong woman is not a threat to a man with strength to match. Our job is virtue and keeping virtues clear in the public mind (to chastise, from the verb chaste) and defend virtue (child-rearing).

http://thebackbencher.co.uk/political-correctness-is-the-death-knell-of-free-speech/

If only we had a word.

Yes, attacking our children, state, monarchs and way of life are affronts.
It flies in the face of Nurture dogma.
It suggests the better we treat them, the more they hate us.
Irrespective, it is most repugnant to the high trust groups, that survived the Ice Age with tribal bonds (read A Troublesome Inheritance). You want civic nationalism? You ‘integrate’ and ‘assimilate.’ This doesn’t appear possible. It never was. We’re noticing too early.
The pathologically altruistic Whites are still reeling from disbelief, mind boggled, and writing these off as random madness, strange coincidence, than deliberate treason and violation of our sacred, tolerant hospitality.

The consequences for misjudging intent would be too severe, because we would violate it ourselves.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/category/pathological-altruism-among-whites/

There isn’t something wrong with us. We didn’t evolve for this situation. We evolved for ingroup preference. Multiculturalism was deliberately planned to exterminate us. To ‘kill us with (our own) kindness’.

Look at the slogans. Hope, not Hate?

Hope for what? Love, not hate? Where is the love indeed, Black Eyed Peas?

The bleached 20th Century American vision of Christianity, do nothing.

Push this button.

Keep pushing.

…They’ll have nothing.

Kindness of the Whites based on sanctuary is the glue of the anti-West, the anti-white.
Ah, but paleface, they’ll say, sanctuary can only be extended to those within the same religion.
They will claim they were never our guest, never accepted hospitality, but soldiers, and can therefore kill us with impunity. Do whatever they want, they even have a religious instruction manual.

We’re pagans, racially. They can kill pagans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_Verse

http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/pagansources.htm

Ironically, they are pagans worshiping the Kaba stone.

We gave these people life itself, through foreign aid, charities keeping their governments afloat, a home here… and they do this. The Saxon is beginning to hate – the ungrateful guest.

Consider how prosperous we’d be, if we’d left them all alone and never imposed our charity.

The scientific term is compassion fatigue, Stefan.

Lower than savages

Does that even count as a standard or a civilization?

https://stepfeed.com/egyptian-cleric-cites-imam-saying-men-can-marry-their-illegitimate-daughters-0118

Egyptian Salafist cleric Mazen Al-Sersawi has stirred controversy, after a video in which he suggested that Islam allows men to marry their illegitimate daughters went viral.

In the video, Al-Azhar lecturer cites prominent Muslim jurist Imam Al-Shafi’i as saying that illegitimate daughters are not officially attributed to their fathers and can thus be married to them.

This is what they do. I knew this, I am playing shocked for laughs.
Deliberately inbreed. It’s the plan.
If the West hadn’t saved them from famine multiple times, they’d all be dead.

In the 2012 video that recently resurfaced online, he said Imam Al-Shafi’i – one of the four great Imams of Islamic jurisprudence – is known for saying men may marry their own daughters that are born out of wedlock.

Bear in mind, the punishment for adultery is death.

Al-Sersawi explained that if a man has extramarital intercourse with a woman and impregnates her, he is allowed to marry his illegitimate daughter.

Attempting to rationalize the repulsive ruling, Al-Sersawi said that according to Al-Shafi’i, the girl is “not really his daughter” since she is the result of adultery.

“She is not his daughter according to Sharia. She is not officially attributed to him,” he said, adding that illegitimate daughters do not carry their fathers’ names.

Look at the birth defects.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/children/11723308/First-cousin-marriages-in-Pakistani-communities-leading-to-appalling-disabilities-among-children.html

Marrying your cousin once might be necessary, look at the Queen.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/theres-nothing-wrong-with-cousins-getting-married-scientists-say-1210072.html

A single instance is fine. This is not one family nor a one-time thing.

Repeating it and preferring it when there are other options is the taboo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest_taboo
To say it’s less human than animal would be an insult to animals, who are also averse to inbreeding in many species.
Inbreeding means closer than a cousin, typically. Parent/child/siblings are all off-limits. Preferential cousin matches also count.

While Lévi-Strauss generally discounted the relevance of alliance theory in Africa, a particularly strong concern for incest is a fundamental issue among the age systems of East Africa. Here, the avoidance between men of an age-set and their daughters is altogether more intense than in any other sexual avoidance.

Africa is smarter than this. Literally, as you shall see.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-513388/Minister-Muslim-inbreeding-Britain-causing-massive-surge-birth-defects.html

Half of world’s Muslims are inbred due to generations of incest

But the problem isn’t exclusive to Pakistani Muslims as Woolas seems to imply, but is pandemic among Muslims across the world.

Stop supporting the stupid.

Stupidity cannot be cured. Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death. There is no appeal, and execution is carried out automatically and without pity.” –  Robert A. Heinlein

They can’t support a civilization of any order and they won’t even support themselves.
Allah is their excuse to sit around expecting whitey will be their slave forever, like the Jews consider Gentiles. In either case, these are not a people with any type of prudence and/or Darwinian longevity.

The type to ask;

“Tasty seeds, where’s the next meal?”

R-selection, thy symbol is a plague of locust.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Cousin_Marriage_in_Islam#Science_and_Statistics

A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called “consanguinity”) and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent.[11]

Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen.[12][13]

Over time that converges to 100%.

https://en.europenews.dk/-Muslim-Inbreeding-Impacts-on-intelligence-sanity-health-and-society-78170.html

Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from related parents and that abilities related to social behavior develops slower in inbred babies:

Fair question: Why is it okay when nobility do it?
They already have HIGH IQ and they’re PRESERVING it.
From?
Genetic load from outsiders. It’s temporary, until better matches can be found for children and grandchildren.

So all these “why do Muslims not just wait?” questions fail to understand how easy they’d be to mow down with the army, if we only had the political will.

That’s a whole SD, below their already low IQ parents.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/fun-iq-list/

Pakistan 84 there.

This is a relatively consistent finding from my extensive research.

They’re already 1SD below UK average.
It isn’t racism, it’s them.

If you pit a sensible person who trains against a lazy one who sits around eating in a race, it isn’t mentally taxing to know who’ll probably win. Can you reason with that? Equality dogma is poison to console the loser. They don’t stand a chance according to Second World standards, let alone First!

They won’t stop being angry. They won’t get less angry. They can’t.

In the immortal words of Goethe, There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity.

*drops monocle, sarcastically slow claps*

Nothing. Worse. Goethe. Master.

I feel like he’d know this.

Lurk more – HBD blogs. It’s tough to be surprised after that.

Look at him go, with those little legs.

Inbreeding depression on Asian IQ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8240214

A significant (p 0.001) negative association was found between inbreeding and score on the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-C). In addition, the weighted mean IQ of inbred children )88.4 + or – 1.37) differed significant (p 0.001) from that recorded among 50 noninbred controls of similar age and socioeconomic status (99.6 + or – 2.0). The group means for both verbal and performance IQ subscales differed significantly and in the expected direction between subjects and controls…Additional surveys in other populations and for various inbreeding levels are recommended.

You can only deny this if you can’t do math.

http://www.gluefox.com/min/IQ%20effects%20india.pdf

I know it’s mean to India, but have you looked at their population boom? There’s a billion of them, they chose to be poor because resources are finite but population needs to match.

A measurable IQ of 69 was found. ~titter~
Compared to the Indian average of 82, lower than Nigeria at 84.

Going back to the most recent national IQ list I posted, that would be lower than the national stated average of Kenya, South Africa, the Congo, Botswana and the Sudan. Rwanda is 70.
69 is the IQ of Ethiopia and Malawi.

Hey, I’m sure this doesn’t mean much, right? Globally.

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/03/17/islam-worlds-fastest-growing-religion-except-australia

Islam is also fastest growing religion in Europe. Can’t be all bad?

Of course, Islam did originate from Asia so it’s hardly surprising it’s spreading so fast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Asia#Islam

 South Asia and Southeast Asia are home of the most populous Muslim countries, with IndonesiaPakistanIndia, and Bangladesh having more than 100 million adherents each. According to U.S. government figures, in 2006 there were 20 million Muslims in China. In the Western Asia, the non-Arab countries of Iran and Turkey are the largest Muslim-majority countries. In South Asia, Pakistan and Bangladesh are the countries with the largest Muslim-majority. In Central Asia, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan are the countries with the largest Muslim-majority.

The IQ values do not look promising.

http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/asia-pacific/

Muslims are projected to grow even faster and become the largest religious group in the region by mid-century. The Muslim population in Asia and the Pacific is expected to increase by almost 50% to nearly 1.5 billion in 2050.

Back to IQ. That pdf is formally here;

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01082310

A three-factor analysis of variance performed on the full-scale IQ scores indicated that both consanguinity and locality affect IQ.

Muslims studied, by a man called Mohammad, connection remained despite middle-class (wealthy) subjects.
I don’t think money will fix this.

Islam Inbreeding IQ and Aggression

Among the many birth defects that are the result of inbreeding are lower levels of IQ and higher levels of aggression. Yikes. That might explain the correlation for support for the brutal Islamic Law called “Sharia” and just how long a region has been Islamic.

According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred:

  • 70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
  • 67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
  • 64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
  • 63% of Sudanese are inbred.
  • 60% of Iraqis are inbred.
  • 54% of Muslims in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
  • 25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
  • In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
  • In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

I love it when others pull up good data.

https://pickeringpost.com/story/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/1316

IQ is a controversial subject, not because there are not loads of evidence pointing to how relevant IQ is. Rather, it is controversial because when you discuss it, you might hurt someone’s feelings. It is estimated that, worldwide, the average IQ for Muslims is 81. Research shows that intelligence can go down 10-16 points, if one’s parents are cousins.

The risk for having an IQ lower than 70, which is what we call in the West “retarded” increases by 400 percent among the offspring of first cousin marriages.

Islam is the fastest growing belief system (some call it a religion) in the world today. It is sweeping through Africa like a wildfire.

Yep.
Look at African demographics. I have done posts.

Remember: London’s Jews imported them by choice.

https://search.proquest.com/openview/0687ad9f04772d67e6df48de2195ff9c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=45619

The most important independent predictors of adolescent aggression were
troublesome and aggressive (difficult to discipline) behavior and lowintelligence
and attainment at ages 8-10.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-5170-2_10

Aggression and Its Correlates over 22 Years

It is apparent from the varied substance of the chapters in this book that aggression is an overdetermined behavior. There are genetic, constitutional, and environmental factors as well as individual learning history and specific situational events which go into determining whether a person will act in an aggressive manner at any specific time. However, the large number of possible determinants does not mean that aggressive behavior cannot be predicted or explained. Research that my colleagues and I have been doing indicates, in fact, that aggressive behavior is consistent over time and across situations despite the fact that a number of factors contribute to the behavior in varying degrees.

intellectual ability was negatively related to aggressive behavior both contemporaneously and over time, and that intellectual competence itself showed a remarkable constancy over time and across measures.

Did I mention there’s a pirate bay for academic papers?

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-15097-001

There’s no hope for them, they cannot be taught.

In a 22-year study, data were collected on aggressiveness and intellectual functioning in more than 600 subjects, their parents, and their children. Both aggression and intellectual functioning are reasonably stable in a subject’s lifetime and perpetuate themselves across generations and within marriage pairs. Aggression in childhood was shown to interfere with the development of intellectual functioning and to be predictive of poorer intellectual achievement as an adult. Early IQ was related to early subject aggression but did not predict changes in aggression after age 8.

Eight, they’re set at eight.

Differences between early IQ and intellectual achievement in middle adulthood were predictable from early aggressive behavior. A dual-process model was offered to explain the relation between intellectual functioning and aggressive behavior. We hypothesized that low intelligence makes the learning of aggressive responses more likely at an early age, and this aggressive behavior makes continued intellectual development more difficult.

Incentives, as in behaviorism, do not operate in the low IQ as in the average. They are designed for regular intellects.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/developmental-medicine-and-child-neurology/article/behavior-and-mental-health-problems-in-children-with-epilepsy-and-low-iq/8F61E81D9364DE7757B91E549420F220

Low IQ here, 56-84. Middle 85-100, we used to call those morons. High 101-130.
If you read the full study, that’s an interesting cutoff. 85 as middle? It’s over 1SD.

Results indicated that children in the Low IQ group had the most behavioral and mental health problems. 

http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/193/3/185

IQ and non-clinical psychotic symptoms in 12-year-olds: results from the ALSPAC birth cohort

 There is a well-established association between pre-morbid low IQ score and schizophrenia. Psychosis-like symptoms in children may also be a risk factor for psychotic disorder but their relationship with IQ is unclear.

Over 6000 children

IQ was assessed at 8 years of age using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd UK edition).

After adjustment for confounding variables, there was a non-linear association between IQ score and psychosis-like symptoms, such that only those with below average IQ score had an increased risk of reporting such symptoms.

High IQ aren’t crazy, only the low.

 An association between low IQ score and the later development of schizophrenia has been established for many years.1116 The risk of schizophrenia increases gradually as IQ score falls, so that individuals with an average IQ score have an increased risk compared with those with the highest IQ scores.13,14,17

Knowing the Left, they’d brag about this for money.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-39082595

https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/types-of-mental-health-problems/schizophrenia/

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/07/the-enigma-of-urban-psychosis/491141/

“The Mystery of Urban Psychosis

Why are paranoia and schizophrenia more common in cities?”

Drugs can trigger it.

https://www.salon.com/2017/11/02/adolescent-pot-smoking-and-psychosis-link-strengthens_partner/

 At the World Psychiatric Association’s World Congress in Berlin on October 9, Hannelore Ehrenreich of the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine presented results of a study of 1,200 people with schizophrenia. The investigation analyzed a wide range of genetic and environmental risk factors for developing the debilitating mental illness. The results — being submitted for publication — show people who had consumed cannabis before age 18 developed schizophrenia approximately 10 years earlier than others. The higher the frequency of use, the data indicated, the earlier the age of schizophrenia onset. In her study neither alcohol use nor genetics predicted an earlier time of inception, but pot did. “Cannabis use during puberty is a major risk factor for schizophrenia,” Ehrenreich says.

Mystery.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/city-teenagers-psychosis-mental-health-country-adolescents-40-per-cent-study-schizophrenia-bulletin-a7750151.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2418996/

The largest study to date has demonstrated a ninefold higher risk of schizophrenia in UK-resident black Caribbeans:

Mystery.

http://www.bmj.com/content/323/7325/1336.short

http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7374/1212.short

The strongest evidence that cannabis use may be a risk factor for later psychosis comes from a Swedish cohort study which found that heavy cannabis use at age 18 increased the risk of later schizophrenia sixfold. 12 This study could not establish whether adolescent cannabis use was a consequence of pre-existing psychotic symptoms rather than a cause. We present the first prospective longitudinal study of adolescent cannabis use as a risk factor for adult schizophreniform disorder, taking into account childhood psychotic symptoms3 antedating cannabis use

http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000120

They won’t be violent, the money-grubbers say.

Schizophrenia and other psychoses are associated with violence and violent offending, particularly homicide. However, most of the excess risk appears to be mediated by substance abuse comorbidity. The risk in these patients with comorbidity is similar to that for substance abuse without psychosis. Public health strategies for violence reduction could consider focusing on the primary and secondary prevention of substance abuse.

Now for genetics.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941049

 the MAOA-uVNTR significantly predicted FSIQ, PIQ and verbal IQ (VIQ) (P = 0.009, 0.019, 0.038);

MAOA is the rage gene. Asian boys, IQ and MAO link, but ADHD confound.

https://selfhacked.com/blog/about-mao-a-and-what-to-do-if-you-have-the-warrior-gene/#Effects_ofLow_MAO-A_Levels

People with the low-activity MAO-A gene (2R, 3R) are overall more prone to violence.

Specifically, when these people feel very provoked or socially isolated their aggression will come out.

People with low MAO-A are more likely to be risk takers.  They are also more likely to take revenge and use greater force if they get screwed over, but not for small screw overs.

Mice with low MAO-A are also more aggressive in general and are more likely to start turf wars.

People and mice with low MAO-A are more impulsive and aggressive.

So the retarded form is bad, the slow kind.

https://thebiologist.rsb.org.uk/biologist-features/158-biologist/features/903-crime-genes

 The MAOA gene is X-linked, and these men and others in successive generations all exhibited problem behaviour including impulsive aggression, arson and rape.

Best preserved by incest marriage, then it’s definitely passed on via the women.

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/maoa-race-and-crime/

If only someone studied MAOA in Pakistan, place of highest incest marriage from Islam.

http://www.jpma.org.pk/full_article_text.php?article_id=7424

Oh wait.

They did.

 The variance was significantly different only for the anger sub-scale (p<0.05).

Does nobody just check anymore?

The X chromosomal location of the MAOA gene allowed us to determine the haplotype in these male individuals without imputation.

Aggression is a complex personality trait that is likely to be associated with the action of several genes involved in brain function.3 This is the first study investigating an association between scores on the self-reporting Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and the candidate gene, MAOA, in male subjects from Pakistan.

Self-report?

In the absence of whole genome sequences from South Asia…

Why is this study so shit?

Questionnaire in this population is an intriguing observation and requires replication in other population groups. It suggests that some humans may have been evolutionarily conditioned to curb their aggressive tendencies, thus enabling them to form social groupings. Such studies will help to unravel the role of candidate genes, epigenetics, gene-environment and gene-gene interactions in the development of aggressive human behaviour.29 Genome-wide association studies or whole genome sequencing of several thousand selected individuals with carefully defined behavioural phenotypes may offer several additional candidates for replication studies and functional analyses.
Our study was under-powered due to limitations in sample size and due to the fact that some samples had to be dropped because they could not be genotyped due to limited amount or poor quality of the DNA available.

Well they tried.

A better write-up.

http://prr.hec.gov.pk/chapters/998s-2.pdf

There is strong evidence that genes play a significant role in antisocial behavior and
aggression (Raine, 2002). A bulk of twin and adoption studies provides clear evidence
that about 50% of the variance in antisocial behavior is attributable to genetic influences
(Moffit, 2005).

MAO –

Additionally it is involved in the metabolism of many
neurochemicals such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin and dopamine, already
linked to antisocial and aggressive behavior (de Almeida et al. 2005).

Most of the common DNA variants associated with complex traits and diseases have
been studied in populations of European origin, and the possibility of altered behavior
due to different gene-gene and gene- environment interactions in the non-European
populations has remained unexplored (Yngvadottir et al, 2009).

Coincidence.

The present study is the first attempt to explore DNA variations associated with aggressive behavior in an Asian population.

The first definitive evidence of MAOA gene involvement with aggression was
reported in a large Dutch kindred with a new form of X-linked, nondysmorphic, mild
mental retardation described as Brunner Syndrome (Brunner et al. 1993). The affected
males of this family showed abnormal behavior such as aggression, arson, attempted rape
and exhibitionism.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24326626

http://theunsilencedscience.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/scientists-rediscover-violence-gene.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105117/

 In order to account for any potential issues arising from the ethnic stratification of the sample, the analyses were then repeated omitting the 47 cohort members of Maori, Pacific Island and Asian ethnicity.

Coincidence.

Why are you studying Whites instead of Asians, we’ve done this. Decades now.

Grounds for Difference by Rogers Brubaker.

Collectivism, my old friend…

https://academic.oup.com/scan/article-pdf/5/2-3/203/4679439/nsq059.pdf

Is there a genetic contribution to cultural
differences? Collectivism, individualism and
genetic markers of social sensitivity

Monoamine oxidase A and social rejection

That’s the section they can justify politically how the crimes of non-whitey are all the fault of whitey.

this polymorphism influencing sensitivity to social input in general

Are Muslims outraged by everything? Impossible, I know.

Particularly for the sensitivity alleles of the
A118G and MAOA polymorphisms, it appears that the experience
of being excluded from the social interactions of
others can be particularly aversive

Given that there is a higher prevalence of these putative
social sensitivity alleles in East Asian populations than in
Caucasian populations, there may be a relationship between
the relative proportion of these alleles and the predominant
cultural forms in a population. In collectivistic cultures, relationships
are enduring due to social ties that are reified by
mutual obligations between members of the family, clan, or
religion. These relationships are so salient that the self is
defined by them. Thus, the implicit construction of the self
in members of these cultures is inherently relational (Fiske
et al., 1998)

So casual.

I think you can begin to see why there isn’t much research on this topic.

It would be expensive and embarrassing when trade deals are on the table.

The “Independent”

jigsawpiecestogether.jpeg

It used to be half-decent, I’m old enough to remember. Now it’s trying to out-Guardian the Guardian.

At least there wouldn’t be any more cringe corporate Gay Pride stories or Hollywood Jews to do the rape.
We could get some lovely Asians to do the jobs they don’t want to do because they’re too busy pulling a Superman.
Sharia doesn’t allow female testimony, which solves the issue of scandal nicely.

Everyone gets raped under Islam, even little boys. How equal.

Why don’t we have Muzzi version of echoes?

e.g.

The <<<Independent>>>

Video: Islamic inventions

Check out Islamophilia.

The virus is so two-faced and patronising. Well, infantilizing is the literal term.
>”I invented everything!”
>”Of course you did, baby!”

It’s trendy to pick on Afrocentrism.
But to be truly on the edge, Islamocentrism.
Because stealing Greek manuscripts is the same as writing them.

Even IF.

IF.

That were true.

What the fuck happened?

Why is Islamic Dark Ages a term? Not during the European Middle ages, I mean the cultural shift to ignorance way beforehand.

Why do you resist reformation and basic science, like the earth revolving around the sun?

What have all your geniuses been doing for centuries (when you didn’t murder them on record) for over a millennium?

Why did white people have to invent the Scientific Method? NW Europeans, not even all white people!

Where were you?

Why do you still have Third World problems? Couldn’t your people have fixed these?

Why did you lose when we finally fought back against conquest in the Crusades?

Why did so many empires fall?

Why do you rely on the evil West for primitive 101 things like water supply?

Bestiality? At the very least, less incest. Not eradication, look at our Queen marrying her cousin, just less.

What’s the deal with the very current phenomena of child rape? Even little boys?

Where’s the self control in your young men?

 

You can’t take a culture that values lying and expect it to be intellectually honest.

A scientific society isn’t just something you can claim. It shows.

Where is the IQ data?

Do the Royals still like refugees?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/25/buckingham-palace-lockdown-man-sword-attacks-officer/

They’re trying to keep this quiet.

So it must be BAD.

You import the low IQ and violent, the mentally deranged who’d never pass a simple flight check given their previous… and from countries where the way to be Boss is to kill the old one?

What did you expect?

After Parliament, this was an obvious target. It’s a symbol of the nation.

There’s a pattern.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/convicted-killer-who-tried-meet-10453958

“Ghodratollah Barani strangled homeless man after voices told him he’d become monarch if he did it – before he broke into palace to meet the Queen”

They don’t want to be like that infamous swan.

(Swans are sacred here.)

UK changes rules for Muslims again

https://mic.com/articles/183344/muslim-beauty-queen-in-the-uk-makes-history-after-choosing-to-wear-a-kaftan-instead-of-a-bikini
“I wouldn’t wear a bikini to the beach, so I’m not going to wear one in a competition to score points,”
Then you don’t qualify for the competition.

Like if I turned up for a BBQ-eating competition and said

“I’m not going to eat anything but sweetcorn because I’m a vegetarian.”

When will the madness end?

Meanwhile, they’d stone her for showing off her ankles and wearing makeup.

Muslims don’t wear makeup.

And most makeup includes animal products, especially pork glycerin.

Look it up!