Video: Non-GPS tracking

One purpose of 5G. It’s like a prison ankle bracelet.

“Oh!” you say, “I’m fine because my phone is 2G/3G/4G!”

Except they’re decommissioning those towers, turning prepper emergency phones into bricks.

(Whether it’s legal to decomm emergency phones? Nobody seems to care).

But sure, Boris, let the Chicoms know where almost every UK citizen is at all times.

U smart Etonian bro.

I’m sure this won’t be used to put political opponents in prison.

They also want to force you cashless or put chips into the cash.

This makes old “hoarded”* cash worthless and they can inflate away your PP while making you pay any additional “taxes” they made up that morning based on whatever you buy, instantly.

The i in iPhone stands for idiot.

Two things I don’t understand the libertarians wanna keep: 1. the religious concept of a “sin tax” and 2. state-funded RE classes (really Multicultural Studies 101).

So they can see where you are, what you’re doing, control what you’re buying and monitor what you think online by viewing stats, what you say through the microphone (no battery release option in newer phones) and say online.

Yeah, China itself is SO bad, right?

We lost a war.

*Under Communism, any ownership is hoarding.

Edginess = bias?

You can tell the people who fed Norman wanted to make him seem ridiculous (deny/disqualify) but it reads like depressive realism, he isn’t psychopathic, he’s depressed.

And as the name suggests, it’s more realistic than the social desirability biased responses of regular AI.

I trust more the AI that isn’t hiding the negative responses.

That suppression is deception.

Stealing intellectual property

Security issues, et tu?

That is an act of war. That is an invasion. Companies too. They’re the machine in war machine.

If you think that’s nothing, consider these things often have military applications.┬áIt doesn’t have to be obvious. Intellectual property is still property and the theft can net a lot of money. It means the R&D costs nothing (to the thief) so the profits are even higher. IP can be worth more than a jewelry heist or bank robbery. Or ten.

Imagine if the West had kept computers and other white technology to ourselves.

Ah, but “diversity is our strength”, isn’t it?

All this multicultural sharing has been so good for us!

We can trust our historic, low IQ bitter enemies because it’s the current year!

War is outlawed!

They have foreign students passing them system details, only way these hacks work.

The Left are the ignorant ones

I’ve never had to explain shadow banning to a right-winger.

It’s always the left wing.

You can explain in five different ways.

They still won’t get it.

“But I posted it, people can see it!”


It’s only up FOR YOU.


To trick you into using a service that won’t serve you.

This means you won’t seek out or make competition.

It’s anti-competition and hence, illegal.



Another point:

Just because they write something in a shitty Terms of Service doesn’t make it legally valid.

It has to end up in court and be maintained, which almost never happens.

Otherwise they could take all your rights away because TOS.

Anyone can write a TOS. You can write a TOS. It means nothing.

So no, instagram don’t own your photos and if they use your copyright for a profit, you can and should sue. You didn’t negotiate terms and they didn’t expressly pay on a photo by photo basis. They can’t deprive you your IP rights as a content creator. Same with YT videos.

They are a hosting service with delusions of ownership.
On the DailyMail, a celebrity’s selfie will have the copyright logo and …”Instagram”.


Challenge that, Trump.
The copyright is created when the photo is made, there is no transfer without a specific contract and exchange of money. No.
They use this data, sell it and things you always own (even after death) like your likeness can be used for deepfakes and AI “research”.┬áInformed consent in experiments means you must know what you’re entered into, study by study, with an option to opt out. They stole the data for research so it isn’t scientific and none of it actually counts.

They are acting as an illegal government, over-ruling the real one.

That’s why their stock price is so high.

Silicon Valley’s social media will go down in history as the biggest attempted intellectual property theft in human history. They don’t own your crappy poetry, your book reviews, NONE OF IT.

Things also turn invisible, disappear entirely from the selected page the FIRST time you load it (because who loads twice) and Twitter decides to unfollow people for you and follow other people on your behalf if you’ve been away from it for a length of time and presumably, won’t notice.

Make an offence for digital gaslighting?

Digital Communism
I jest but only a little.
The system could be compromised. It’s difficult, but not impossible.
It makes me laugh when they claim anything’s foolproof. I think of the propeller guy in Titanic.

nb Government and corporation are now used in the same sentence.
At least in a monarchy, you know exactly what the bastard at the top looks like.
Playing jigsaw with a different kinda bit is open to many points of failure, the omission of a single point only puts off the amateurs. Who owns the most pieces, it’s bloody Monopoly.

Ah, the ambiguity of ‘human error’.


“The operative word is “may”.

Blockchain is nothing more than an accounting system that allows tracking where an entry to the blockchain, once entered, can’t be altered. However, unlike blockchains in cryptocurrencies where the blockchain entry is integral to the spending of the “coin”, blockchain applied to real items relies on the honesty of the people making the entries in the blockchain that is associated with the transfer of the item. In other words, an entry to a blockchain used for tracking a tangible asset can be falsified when created, but once an entry is created, it can’t be altered. In addition, it’s difficult to come up with a system that insures the tangible asset associated with a given blockchain is in fact the correct tangible asset.”

10/10, all the points and you win a cookie, Sir.

Techs trust People because their SQ sucks. Data is the new gospel, it seems.

Why would food need an audit? What happens if the governing body thinks you have too much?

NP? YP. Property will always exist and be consolidated. As advanced as we like to think this 21C hellscape is, it still comes down to who owns the mines, that retain the resources, to literally, physically build these systems.

Click to access v16a6.Kabemba.HD_.pdf

Well, shit. Guess we have to pray for a Godly EMP blast with a curving radius. Better pray to your chosen solar deity.
BTW, they wanna track and record what you eat.
For your own good, obvi.
Cash will still totally work, until there’s sufficient political push that it doesn’t.
This is hardly the first time I’ve mentioned food security as an existential risk and they hardly do either, since there’s a serious, national problem that hi-tech pen-pushing isn’t going to fix.

It looks like it would help though and that’s all they really care about – expensive crap that looks impressive to voters. Rather than prevent fifty people get the shits for a week for being too lazy to cook [see end], maybe we could rein in the impulse to pull a Geldoff and notoriously fail to ‘feed the world’ like an errant deer and just focus on our own doorstep, our own, singular, one little country at a time?

If you can’t do that, are you really qualified to run a student council?

Digital spread-betting won’t plant more crops locally and won’t make them healthier either.

Tea is good but toast is crunchy.

If you want to know what really causes food contamination, look up the hygiene ‘standards’ for the many immigrants working food. They don’t wash, they don’t wipe, some do with their hand. Illegal ones aren’t screened for disease, legal ones rarely are either. They’re cheaper for a reason.

Slavery (wages) will continue in America until the Left decides it wants to forego cheap burritos for human rights.