Divorce RISING in Asia, achtually

TLDR: The manosphere is selling you Titanic tickets.

One of two possible explanations: the low quality males being exported there are causing it and/or degeneracy is global and cannot be blamed on the West or Western women. Pick ONE or BOTH. It cannot be statistically denied unless you a bluepill little bitch.

DO THE RESEARCH.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233709670_Divorce_Trends_in_Asia
Abstract This paper presents and discusses recent trends in divorce for countries in Asia, highlighting both wide variations in divorce patterns and recent changes in divorce trends for countries in the region. Three broad regional patterns are evident: an East Asian pattern characterised by increasing divorce rates, though there are signs of stabilisation in some countries in the last few years; an Islamic Southeast Asian pattern characterised by declining divorce rates until recently; and a South Asian pattern with relatively stable and low divorce rates.

The paper also discusses divorce in international marriages in some East Asian countries and Singapore.

so try to find the PDF for that race-mixing fun! Isn’t there a piratebay for academic papers?…

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Age-specific-divorce-rates-for-women-Singapore-1980-2009_fig3_233709670
Like the West, women under 24 most likely to divorce because their brain hasn’t finished developing yet.
So they outgrow the husband.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Crude-divorce-rates-East-Asia-and-Singapore-1976-2009_fig1_233709670
South Korea rates highest among those in chart.

NO free rides.

JSTOR of paper: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43498086?item_view=read_online

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272506770_Divorce_in_Asia
The only areas that aren’t divorcing as much are Muslim.
Good luck enjoying your sinful way of life when your kids have to put up with rape gangs.

Onto some specific countries:

It’s almost like the r-types are toxic wherever they go… it isn’t the women, it’s THEM. Sexual locust.

However, they can divorce if they’re married to a foreigner. They can also claim asylum or citizenship (green card style) by going to the embassy of the foreign spouse’s country. Does the manosphere talk about this? No. It’s a ponzi of beach, e-books and pussy. Only a few at the top can actually succeed, by profiteering off the latecomers.
Contrary to popular belief in the manosphere (read: delusion) one CAN divorce as Filipino – as long as your spouse is foreign. See:

“The Church’s strong opposition to divorce is probably the main reason why the Philippines is the only country in the world, together with the Vatican, where divorce is not legal. Except for Filipinos who are married to foreigners and seek divorce in another country, and for Muslim Filipinos who are governed by different marriage laws¹, about 95% of Filipinos need to file a nullity of marriage or an annulment² to legally terminate their marriage. However, only a small fraction resort to these remedies because, while the outcome is uncertain, costs are high (usually not less than three months of average labour earnings, and sometimes much more) and the legal procedures are long and complex. Completing a matrimonial dissolution case typically takes between six and eighteen months but the procedure can also extend over several years (Lopez, 2006).”

Sorry I understand data, I guess? My opinions are based in reality.

It’s a technicality, she may not divorce you but she will still leave you.

STARE AT THE CHART. LOOK AT IT. NOT MY OPINION.

cook the rice, pay the price

They ain’t traditional, living in sin just isn’t.
“The increase in union dissolution has been accompanied by a parallel increase in the proportion of Filipinos who live together with their partner without marrying. In the past two decades, the proportion of cohabiting Filipino women of reproductive age almost trebled, from 5.2% in 1993 to 14.5% in 2013 (Abalos 2014; PSA and ICF 2014). As cohabitation has much higher dissolution rates than formal marriage (Figure 3), the rise in cohabitation will likely lead to an increase in the proportion of Filipinos who are separated³. The rise in cohabitation may also be attributable to the country’s “marriage crisis”: cohabitation may be preferable to marriage precisely because it is relatively easier and cheaper to end.”

And over HALF of Filipino women WANT to be able to divorce the weebs:

don’t hate the messenger, hate the data

“While most Filipinos still hold conservative views about marriage and divorce, a growing segment of the population is becoming more receptive to the idea of divorce. Figure 2 shows that over the last decade the proportion of Filipinos who agreed that “Married couples who have already separated and cannot reconcile anymore should be allowed to divorce so that they can legally marry again” increased from 43% in 2005 to 60% in 2014. This growing acceptance of divorce may have contributed to reducing the stigma of being divorced or separated, particularly among women, who were, and still are, expected to make all possible efforts to keep their marriage intact.”
The Bible says to forsake a cold or abusive husband so… dunno where they get that idea.
If women are keeping the marriage together, they are de facto head of the household.

“The increasing exposure of Filipinos to the urban environment (42.4% were city dwellers in 2007 and 45.3% in 2010) has probably contributed to this growing liberal attitude towards divorce. Urbanization is commonly associated with non-traditional lifestyles and behaviors, and reduces the influence of the extended family on the decisions of young people, including mate selection. This means that children do not feel obliged (by their parents’ choice) to stay in a marriage when it has become unbearable. This constitutes a break from a still recent past when parents and other family members exerted strong pressure on couples to keep their marriage intact in order to strengthen family bonds and protect the family’s reputation.”
No comment.

Muslims are also more likely to wish to dissolve than Catholics, because legally it’s easier for them.
(see link for chart)
https://www.niussp.org/staging/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Schermata-2017-07-06-alle-15.11.09.png
So it’s nothing special inherent in a religion, it’s the laws and how easy they are.

Predictably, higher IQ (education filter) women have higher rate of divorce. Well, high IQ can see something isn’t going to work, ever. The same is true of high IQ men. I don’t know why the latter isn’t mentioned.
“Figure 3 shows the odds ratio or the relative probability of being divorced and separated among Filipino women, controlling for different factors. Highly educated Filipino women have higher odds of dissolving their union than women with lower levels of education. Higher education in the Philippines improves the economic status of women and is more likely to provide them with financial independence. Indeed, a key factor for Filipino women when they leave their husband is their ability to support themselves and their children. This sense of independence and empowerment also enables women to transcend the social stigma of being divorced or separated.”
The education doesn’t cause that, it’s the IQ filter OF education in many ways.
The ones who move West rely on the white tax welfare state to support leaving, yet another leech. Again, they’re materialistic and see white men as money banks.

“As cohabitation becomes more common and as more Filipinos come to embrace more unconventional views toward marriage and divorce, the increase in union dissolution in the Philippines is unlikely to slow down in the coming years. The continued expansion of educational opportunities for women and the growing mobility of young people to urban areas will also contribute towards the steady increase in union breakdowns among Filipinos. With the recent change in leadership in the Philippines, the political atmosphere has also become more open to laws opposed by the Catholic Church, as evidenced by the strong support for the revival of the death penalty. Despite this, the Catholic Church remains a force to be reckoned with in terms of divorce legislation in the Philippines.”
TLDR: IT WILL BE MADE LEGAL IMMINENTLY AS THE OLD GENS DIE OFF.
ONCE AGAIN, THE MANOSPHERE LIES.

My own country has sensible voiding laws so expect those to expand in Asia too. In the UK, if your spouse hid an STD (including lifelong ones like herpes) from you prior to marriage, it is grounds to have the union voided. It’s also a crime to willingly pass on diseases, aka without prior informed consent, so if they were to go more traditional, the manosphere would be fucked either way.
Especially if they relate it to the death penalty and kill the cads. They claim to want patriarchy, but they really, really don’t.

MALAYSIA
https://www.rage.com.my/divorce-on-the-rise/
“IN 2012, there were 56,760 divorces recorded in Malaysia. That’s one every 10 minutes. It’s no secret – divorce is becoming increasingly common. The numbers have doubled since 2004, and when we did a manual check at the KL Family Court (which oversees non-Muslim divorces), there was an astounding 266 divorce petitions between April 28 and May 30 – and that’s just in Kuala Lumpur!
But those numbers aren’t just made up of jaded old couples. There has been a steep rise in the number of divorce petitions being brought by young couples, according to Goh Siu Lin, a family practitioner and president of the Association of Women Lawyers. Halimatunsa’diah Abu Ahmad, a Syariah lawyer, has also observed a large number of young Muslim couples seeking divorces in court.”

You don’t see the likes of Cappy covering this data, do ya? Just like he says you must kiss the feet of every central banker and a certain religion famed for usury has nothing to do with interest payment. Follow the Pied Pipers!

“Across Asia, the stigma attached to divorce often was the single biggest barrier to getting one. In this generation, that stigma virtually does not exist.”
“In an article posted on the East Asia Forum in 2013, Professor Gavin Jones of the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore, said “divorce rates throughout East and South-East Asia appear to have been generally on the rise since the 1980s, partly because the stigma attached to divorce appears to have faded.””
“For a lot of young couples today, personal happiness outweighs an unhappy marriage….”
Global narcissism. GLOBAL.
An attempted abuser story:
“His own happiness was so important to him that he wanted out because he couldn’t change his spouse to his liking,” said Halimatun.
This is why courtship is so important. YOU CANNOT CHANGE ANYONE EXCEPT YOURSELF.
And why would a woman change after she got the ring? That’s insane.
“Women now make up 57% of Malaysian graduates — they are educated, financially independent and socially empowered. They no longer have to put up with harmful relationships.
…This means we will be seeing more two-income families, with young women progressively more career-oriented. That’s the good news. The bad news is, archetypal Asian stereotypes and thinking still exist, and the notion that a woman must shoulder the burden of household chores and child care has led to many divorces, said Goh.”

UP and coming economy = destroys family.
You picked this.

“In 1940, the average age of marriage in Malaysia was 18.5, and in 1970, it was 22.3, according to a research paper by Barbara Von Elm and Charles Hirschman titled Age At First Marriage In Peninsular Malaysia. Now, according to a National Population and Family Development Board survey on trends between 2000 to 2007, the average marrying age of Malaysians appears likely to increase to 33 in 2015.”

That’s a K force, good. Fewer unwanted kids. Demographic transition at play.

“But, perhaps just as importantly, getting married later could also greatly reduce your risk of getting a divorce. Sociologist Belinda Hewitt of the University of Queensland told the Sydney Morning Herald in 2012: “Basically, if you marry under the age of 25, you have about a four times increased risk of divorce.” Hewitt’s research also indicated that each additional year’s delay in marriage age reduces the odds of marital breakdown by almost six per cent per year for men, and nine per cent per year for women.”

So women are listening to the data and waiting.

INDONESIA
https://www.ucanews.com/news/indonesia-records-sharp-rise-in-divorce-rate/90725#

“More than 1,100 divorces have been recorded each day across Indonesia in the last three years, triggered by domestic violence and financial problems, a family care association reported.

It means that before 2017 an average of 288,000 divorces were recorded every year but the figure jumped to around 421,200 annually over the past three years, the association said.”

It’s easy to tell which MGTOW are wannabe abusers, claiming domestic abuse must be fake.
“About 80 percent of cases were filed by wives who suffered domestic violence at the hands of their husbands, said Sunarti.”
And for all the damage to children when their parents are divorced, it’s nothing to the trauma of living with an abusive parent or witnessing abuse of a parent. So hush.

And the Asian women are planning on locking down a white beta when Asians reject them.
https://www.economist.com/briefing/2011/08/20/the-flight-from-marriage
“WITH her filmy polka-dot dress, huge sunglasses and career as a psychologist, Yi Zoe Hou of Taiwan might seem likely to be besieged by suitors. Yet, at 35, she is well past Taiwan’s unspoken marriage deadline. “It’s a global village,” she shrugs. “If I can’t find a Taiwanese guy that accepts my age, I can find another man somewhere else.” Maybe—but since she still wants children, Ms Hou is also wondering whether to use a sperm bank or ask a male friend to be a sperm donor. She represents a new world of family life for Asians.”

STEP RIGHT UP STEP RIGHT UP
PLAY CPN SAVE A WHORE ASIAN EDITION

notice the race-mixers are the shit tier of whatever society they’re from?

https://www.economist.com/china/2016/12/03/divorce-is-on-the-rise-in-china
A huge cause is adultery. If only we had a Biblical solution to that. You cannot enforce half the Bible. It’s either sanctity of marriage or sanctity of mistresses. Pick ONE.

According to this, the weebs should be going to South America, but we know they just want a woman who looks like a little kid, so fuck data.
https://www.unifiedlawyers.com.au/blog/global-divorce-rates-statistics/
Marrying a Christian also means nothing, especially if one isn’t strong in the faith oneself. You don’t get a decrease marrying a Christian unless you also have always been a Christian. Recent converts, especially deceptive ones who feel entitled to ‘trade up’ to the church virgin after picking up STDs for years with no remorse, are like trannies in all their red flag glory. It’s the comparable gender equivalent. Sneaky fucker strategy in evolution, same thing. Your divorce risk will always be high if you’ve been to Pleasure Island, because of YOU. They act like female virginity can wash away all their sins, including divorce risk. Nope. If anything, the virgin wife would hold you to higher standards, including no porn or other cheating – causing divorce. I’d like to see that data. Do those waiting for marriage have higher standards to REMAIN married? I’ve seen so. Anyway, virgins want another virgin, not a used up manwhore (or ho). Nobody waits for a slut – who couldn’t wait for you. This PC idea you cannot help falling for someone is bull. Lust is not love.

Most common reasons include incompatibility (why did you date them?), infidelity (sue), addiction (sue) and abuse (again, sue them too).
“To get a divorce in the UK, you need to be married at least a year and prove to the court that your marriage has broken down due to one of the following reasons:”
True but you can void it if they had an STD and didn’t openly (i.e. not jokingly) disclose it before the signature.
https://www.gov.uk/how-to-annul-marriage
“the other person had a sexually transmitted disease (STD) when you got married”
just ONE

that’s the real reason the PUAs hate England
it’s legally tricky to be a slut here, from street harassment laws to passing on STD laws

CCP panic
https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Caixin/How-Chinese-fell-out-of-love-with-marriage
“Then there is the age factor. Chinese are increasingly getting married later. The largest age group of people getting married in China is now 25-29, compared with 20-24 in the past, while the number of people over the age of 40 registering for marriage has risen sharply.”
W-w-who will pay for the Boomers?
Themselves. BOOTSTRAPS.
“Most parts of China have witnessed a declining marriage rate since 2013. Generally, there is a negative correlation between a region’s growth in gross domestic product and marriage rates.”
The (((economists))) don’t say that.
“China’s housing prices have been rising sharply since 1998, stressing newlyweds and their parents. Between 2004 and 2018, the outstanding value of individual housing loans increased sixteenfold from 1.6 trillion yuan to 25.8 trillion yuan. In 2018, these mortgages accounted for 54% of residents’ total loans.”
Boomer housing bubble strikes again!
Kinda like Marxism doesn’t work? Nah, get banks to dole out eternal loans.
“In 1982, there were 107.6 boys born for every 100 girls. The figure rose to 110 in 1990, and to118 in 2000. It has since exceeded 120.”
When I say they will eventually ban race-mixing, I am not kidding. And where China goes, the rest of Asia soon follows. They will protect their men and their women from foreign conquest. And they’ll be righteous in doing so. Sexual predation is wrong. Poaching from foreign races is degenerate. Mark my words, they WILL bring in laws to retain their women.
“There is a growing trend of people getting married and having children later in life, which has created to growing senior-care burden that could become a serious drag on the country’s economy.”
K-selection, meet Marxism.
The Boomers could always… get a job?
“China should take measures to help people who cannot afford to get married and raise children. The government should introduce a comprehensive package of pro-family measures, covering housing, education and health care.”
OH YES, THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY A MARXIST GOVERNMENT… CAN BE SOLVED, WITH MORE MARXIST GOVERNMENT!
BRILLIANT JENKINS!

and Asian Millennials are divorcing like Boomers.

Due to economic boom.

The Boomer housing bubble MUST pop. This is not a purely Western problem.

Monoculture goals

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/06/04/national/tackling-signs-japan-youre-not-welcome/#.Ws18s4jwbIU

There’s freedom of association in action.


I want churches to start banning atheists again.
Picture r/atheism.
“We didn’t want to go there anyway but I have rights!”
No, you don’t. You’d think libertarians would know this.

Japan, a matriarchy

http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/286/women-in-ancient-japan-from-matriarchal-antiquity-to-acquiescent-confinement

It was all going well until the Chinese invaded.

Nobody wants to talk about it because they’re still doing it.

Now you have two races of “Japanese” women.

Guess which is real.

https://www.japan-talk.com/jt/new/okozukai

It still is women-led, but the men just pretend.

Men get allowances from their wives.

I wonder if the weebs will change their position on Japanese supremacy now?

In a race with low sexual dimorphism, I don’t think the matriarchy/patriarchy distinction can be made.

And it varies.

e.g. White Italian – matriarchy

White Greek – patriarchy in places, historically, modernity is a matriarchy.

Those are also very traditional areas.

This is not a coincidence, men in charge seek novelty and progressivism.

Patriarchal areas died out as men socially allowed themselves various self-destructive things, that ruined their societies (and no, they didn’t care) e.g. clubs their daughters would waitress in and strip clubs. Most modern societies are like this, being high-tech and based off America, which seemed initially matriarchal during ideas of a nation as a female (Columbia) extending to mother earth and Britannia while still in the Empire. This, until times of war led to gruelling taxes on some men. To justify this, the cartoon Uncle Sam was over-used for every shake-down and now all the men are in debt (national debt). Hey, at least you got a male-looking representative!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_(name)

Why did GBP (Sterling) lose its eminence?

Another scintillating round of explaining things that are obvious to me but nobody else, supposedly.

I don’t want to do many Forex posts but I should fully explain myself.

Click to access Schenk_CNEH.pdf

Lessons for Americans.

TLDR: Stupid spending habits including war. Bleeding hearts lead to bleeding wallets.

Prediction:
” I think it’ll be down to crypto and Sterling (not biased, based on structural factors) plus USD if it gets its own structure in order (I live in hope with a bagful of monies) and maybe Germany’s DM once the EU goes tits up.”

Simply look at this chart.

France is screwed because Islamic immigration has turned Paris, its cultural and economic hub, into a gigantic mosque. They committed cultural suicide. They keep voting in more gibs (a French tradition) and their debt/GDP is 96%. They’re done, it’s over. There’ll have to be a civil war.

Japan’s debt/GDP will make your eyes water but the worst of it is the marriage rate. Their IQ means nothing, they’re dead. The cult of collectivist elderly worship means they won’t make the vital spending cuts to save the young and productive. 250.4% as of 2016.
https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/government-debt-to-gdp

The genuine forces of European might are Germany for pure productivity as you can see and Britain, in part for military might. Historically, we were the reserve currency. We exported language, culture and a sense of suicidal white guilt with a heady Savior Complex. Protestant work ethic isn’t a moral obligation.

Crypto is coming whether the People want it or not. I can’t really explain why, I think it’s stupid.
Never let it be said they passed up an opportunity for control or money.

USD is the wildcard. You could fix it, technically but there’s little incentive.
Most of the voting public don’t understand it isn’t just Russia breathing down your neck but the fatal ship of RussiaxChina, which I will dub Ruina. 

It fits, what can I say?

Raw resources are good but with a shit-tier populace, it doesn’t matter.
Look at all the resources in Africa untouched for millennia. The best capital is intellectual capital and national IQ correlates strongest to GDP.

Two demographic components hardly mentioned are critical, imho.

Population density of K-selected labour – hard-working, patriotic and local-buying. High IQ could be thrown in, plausibly, based on the fact they have high impulse control (grit, low time pref.). From an economic standpoint, kinda important…?

Racial corruption. Nobody wants to talk about that one so I’ll leave it to your imagination. Expected honesty, by contrast, with WEIRD nations and WASP types. You can’t trust a currency controlled by corrupt governments, especially supposedly Marxist ones – Marx was not a fan of wealth and capitalism, to capitalize on investments. You can’t trade with liars and frauds, the wobbly product quality at the very least will ruin your margins. Look up Asian export scandals, there are so, so many. Hey, if you like poison in your baby’s formula, you do you.

You have a better theory, go ahead, hit me with it.

We can make money, we’re in this together. I care when it buys me shoes.

Art that proves geisha weren’t prostitutes

Totally not, perish the thought.

Links are NSFW, in case you didn’t guess. Perverts:

http://www.dreamideamachine.com/en/?p=2838

I mean… you’d have to be so crass and uncultured to know about this stuff.

They needed to live next to the red-light districts because rents were cheap!
OB-viously.

http://onestoparts.com/review-shunga-japanese-art-british-museum-london

What is more, genitals are magnified and extremely detailed, with the almost shocking presence of realistic body hair. 

You’d have to be crazy to assume that’s erotic, right?
We can’t assume porn and prostitution were the aim here.

 Depictions of ancient legend and folklore are also common topics, with one of the most unorthodox prints on display by Katasushika Kyosai illustrating a woman being pleasured by an octopus.

The translation of the accompanying text would make even the most hardened viewer blush, once again showing the British Museum’s commitment to a non-censorship policy.

Since we (((all))) know only white women can be whores, huh?

Love hotels totally aren’t an Asian thing.
LBFMs? Never heard of ’em.

It is still indisputable that these pieces are works of art, and the second section “Masterpieces of Shunga 1765-1850” goes on to reveal even more elaborate works. Hand-scroll for the Four Seasonsby Tsukioka Setti is a mesmerising piece of work painted on silk, celebrating the different phases of a woman’s sexuality. The use of gold leaf and even iridescent inks to enhance the presence of bodily fluids is something that seems so alien to traditional European viewings of art that it is both shocking and liberating.

Madonna/Whore also plays into Yellow Fever versus non-Yellow.

Did the children they bear come into being by magic?

https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2003/04/28/are-geisha-pros.html

Glorify mistresses all you want, there is sex exchanged on one side for money on the other. Okay she’s literate, but so were courtesans. They provide literally the exact same role as European courtesans, and your cultural chinoiserie won’t change that.

Asia was always more degenerate than us, just look at the art. Worse on torture techniques too, than the Medieval Europe era. Men can get tea and conversation from other men. There’s only one thing they’d pay a beautiful woman for in excess…. it isn’t simpering.

And if you think the art had no influence either way on actual behaviour… nothing can cure your stupidity. Europe had chamber art, same function.

https://chaari.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/did-geisha-engage-in-acts-of-prostitution/

“Ukiyo-e expert Gina Collia-Suzuki, in a recent brief but strong blog entry, attacks this notion, asserting that geisha of the Edo period absolutely *did* engage in acts of prostitution, though it should not be confused for being a part of their primary profession.”

Same with courtesans, male ones were primarily entertainers too.
But are entertainers paid that much, to exclusively socialize with only the richest?
Wouldn’t sexual exclusivity make a little more sense..?

“Collia-Suzuki also claims that Mineko Iwasaki, the geisha whose life, revealed through interviews, was the basis of Arthur Golden’s novel, was essentially lying when she denied that the mizuage ceremony involved the selling of a geisha’s virginity for money.”

It’s embarrassing we pedestal anyone like this.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/19556

I’m not disrespecting anyone, I’m being accurate.
I don’t want to post all of these because that isn’t my type of blog but…

So respectful!

They’re just wrestling, right? Totally innocent.

JUST KISSING – what any sane person would conclude.

Her legs need to be open because all that silk is hot and she’s just… ventilating… yeah… sexy ventilating…

 But in actuality, the centuries of shunga speak for themselves, offering a joyous and sensational viewing experience.

I AGREE.

They speak louder than any weeaboo on the subject.

There are so many more links on this topic but honestly, this is so obvious that I’m embarrassed I have to post about it. Are you new to the internet?

Link: Is the Japanese IQ advantage based on diet?

http://roguehealthandfitness.com/is-the-japanese-iq-advantage-due-to-nutrition/

It would be Omega 3, not 6.

I vaguely recollect reading about a study I can’t find, that said when children have higher omega 3, their IQ is boosted but if the ratio is tilted to higher omega 6, it depresses IQ. I think it was a study on breast milk?

One of the many reasons maternal IQ is so important.

A father’s health is important prior to and at conception.

I’d like a follow-up study on white diets because ours is almost wholly omega 6.

Omega 3 is naturally found in breast milk. More important than saving for college.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/surety-bond-breast-feeding/
I understand that some mothers can’t breastfeed but they should try.
Breastfeeding and Other Early Influencers on Children’s IQ
I believe the study was about one of these?
“Was it the breast milk? Some studies are starting to focus on the nutrients, such as the fatty acids docosahexaenoicacid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA), present in breast milk, but there’s no solid evidence that these are responsible for enhancing neural connections or promoting development of cognitive regions of the brain.”

There’s no solid evidence that smoking one cigarette causes lung cancer, either.

When you push whites too far

Someone’s seen this classic.

What’s the opposite of white guilt? Whatever it is, America had it, once.

They literally invent new forms of war every time you fuck with them.
European Civil War is a hobby. WW3 will just be World Civil War. It’s 4th generation.
There’s a definite strain of rage, whether it’s MAO genes or something else.

Nobody talks about Napalm and I think that’s a shame.

Who could look at OJ and think Imma murder the fuck outta someone with this.

Madmen, that’s who.
It’s strange to watch non-whites poke the polar bear with a massive military budget.

Even Saints have a limit on their patience.