Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

Link: Why are people so blind?

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/why-are-people-so-blind.html

  1. their religion is hedonism
  2. their understanding of good is false (it never existed)
  3. evil is a joke
  4. “hate the sin, love the sinner” – Satan
  5. punishment seems impossible when there are unprecedented rewards
  6. the odds of things catching up to them seem remote (they aren’t)
  7. having absolute standards (read: any standards) is un-cool
  8. most people are losers and without this sociosexual rebellion, they know they have nothing.

Similarly provocative

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/what-was-it-like-to-be-jesus.html

“he always knew exactly what to do: he knew and did the right thing.”

Prudence – now an insult.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/soulmates-love-and-sex.html

“The right partner in marriage is the best possible experience we can have of our unconscious and unrealised nature.”

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/my-xtmas-wish-for-you-please-please.html

please, Please, PLEASE don’t waste your time in pointing-out the inconsistencies of The Mainstream Left (i.e. our society), or trying to make sense of them…

They want attention, don’t feed the trolls.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/the-red-pill-must-indeed-be-pill.html

“Those who talk most about themselves having-been Red-Pilled are examples of ‘false-awakening’: still asleep but merely dreaming that they have awoken”

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/common-error-regression-to-mean-of.html

“In other words, to the extent that a high IQ individual comes from a genetically-relatively-intelligence-inbreeding caste or class; there is no regression to the mean.”

Galton never wrote it that way, the guy who invented both IQ (originally) and regression as a concept.

It was twisted that way but actually it doesn’t apply to high IQ, only to the slightly above-average IQ, with a standard deviation or two. The fully top-tier have a common cause – low genetic load, which must be inherited by the offspring since 1. it is recessive and 2. both parents have it. There is a similar heritability with true retardation but it isn’t PC to say so. Regression to the mean apply to normative groups, anything that deserves separate categories must be conforming to different assumptions and ‘rules’. e.g. we all live in the population but there is a select sample of us with green eyes, can we assume the global melanin levels (brown) apply to this sample?

Samples are not populations. I repeat, samples are not populations.
False reports of high IQ will regress to the mean, on the other hand. Scientism is full of false reports.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/which-sex-is-more-vulnerable-to-being.html

“The modern world depends on a spiritual-Christian awakening – both men and women are necessary; but it cannot happen without women.”

At the moment, the things he lists are not choices, they are options after men have made the choices (to settle down, marry, reproduce), they are largely male economic decisions e.g. to propose. The men I’ve asked are in the same position as the women, “I would like to, one day, but I can’t afford to (now)”.

We’ve been whipped, all of us, into productivity, and out of re-productivity.
Celebrating bachelors in the Baby Boomer Bond-era was the beginning of the end. How many of those eventually got married (by which I mean, stayed married, faithfully)? The rise of spinsters came after the playboy bachelor celebration, women followed men into anti-natal decisions.

https://albionawakening.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/is-albion-woman.html

Yes.

All male role models have been a let-down (degenerate) or defined by their women (Arthur).
America was healthy in the times its role model was Lady Liberty more than Uncle Sam.
Male role models appear to be the harbinger of Martian decision-making, reckless and stupid, an extreme of hasty but courageous.
The EU has Captain Euro. It’s a trend.
Britain’s glory days were presaged by Elizabeth I and Britannia.
Boats are female, nations are typically female too. It’s probably the rich soil Goddess versus fertile sky God dynamic. War heroes and industrialists are typically male. Beauties and artists skew feminine.
There is a pattern to the successful society, but what few know is that the prototypic female of plenty was Ceres. Sometimes, as in Britannia, the female also has traces of Athene. This is the only model of female power that worked, alongside possibly Merlin (a positive Saturn) or Jupiter. A young male role model or one with a single purpose (destructive, Uncle Sam) leads to disaster.
Role models of family-centred societies must be hearth-like and probably virginal, at least maternal. Classically a female domain, but I wouldn’t object to male variations e.g. like a male nurse, Apollo. Women seem to be more about preserving rights (to this day, but the wrong ‘rights’) whereas men are, as historically expected, the destructive, who charge in and take or destroy good systems rather than repairing them (handiwork, homework).
Alexander the Great was never a role model.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/who-what-is-antichrist-recognise-by.html

“No – what makes Antichrist, and what makes Antichrist detectable, is any kind of Christianity pursued with unChristian motivation.”

I can still be a Christian and fuck around doing XYZ people.

Sure. It doesn’t count, to you. I can be a vegan and eat eggs on weekends.
See points up-top.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/q-are-psychological-biological-group.html

“So, from this experience, I learned the futility of arguing about evidence when it comes to matters of fundamental assumptions – of metaphysics. If you assume that group differences are plausible – there is ample, high quality of evidence consistent with such assumptions. But if you assume that there are no such differences – then it is an easy matter to explain-away any and every piece of apparent evidence, and to dismiss the arguments of those who oppose you.”

Science v. Scientism.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/the-disaster-of-increased-funding-new.html

“The New Left cannot be ‘fought’, nor organised-against – rather we must opt-out from it.”

Anything you can do to decrease their funding.

The French Disease, the C of E and modern history

inspired by
http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/britains-prince-charles-sees-return-to-dark-days-of-thirties#comment-313855

I decided I need to explain more fully. I’ll be brief and short on proof because you can literally just Google-fu most of it, seriously. It’s literally history. This is about connections. Credit me, biches.

thinking-cap

 

Manwhoring as it’s now known might’ve decided the course of modern history. Fornication is forbidden by the Bible, but nobody asks the punishment for unmarried men?

Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.

First of all, art history. No, really. Seriously, look.

Who is this?

Who is this?

Jesus, right? White Jesus. Regardless of your opinions on the genetics and hue of the region at the time, there is a typical Renaissance image associated with Jesus from this period. It’s oddly youthful and mercurial.

Except that isn’t Jesus. The White Jesus iconography is based on one of the most despicable men in history, the basis for Machiavelli’s Prince. It was based on the bastard son of the Pope, Cesare Borgia.

This Spanish, incestuous piece of shit. Read around about it, he’s worse than Hitler. He deserves to have his name spat on the way people do about Hitler now.
Instead, we continue to depict his likeness as The Christ.

http://macquirelatory.com/False%20Images%20of%20Christ.htm

Who did this portrayal? Leonardo da Vinci. Paid by the Catholic Church, headed by… a Borgia. His father.

…Jesus Christ…

There’s vanity and then there’s demanding someone paint your son as the Son of God, Saviour of Man.

It’s some Alexander-level egotism. Alexander the Great claimed to be a demi-god too.

Before people could read widely, they read paintings, symbolically.

But that which is made with hands is cursed, as well it, as he that made it: he, because he made it; and it, because, being corruptible, it was called god.

I don’t trust Catholic statues for this reason.
They’re creepy. Paintings, fine, but a statue? An idol? No. No, thank you.
I’m pretty sure there was a story about that.

There’s an interesting story that this mystery ‘model’ might be Judas too, twisted by time and sin.
http://www.cjpwisdomandlife.com/davinci-last-supper-judas-jesus/

Ugliness, the wages of sin. They do appear similar, perhaps a reference to Cesare’s public and private face?

http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince17.htm
also http://www.bartleby.com/36/1/17.html

Cesare is mentioned by name preceding its most famous and misquoted passage.

Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with.

The full passage is eye-opening indeed.

fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.

Speaking of the mask of celebrity.

http://ianchadwick.com/machiavelli/chapters-15-21/chapter-15-looking-good-acting-bad/
OT: Machiavelli and Leonardo da Vinci were friends, Assassin’s Creed was truthful.
They tried to collaborate on a river project, what a mash-up.
Why wouldn’t they discuss Cesare, both involved in the constant war of the time?

Machiavelli wrote the Prince to curry Cesare’s favour by praising his decisions.
Medici money had its limits, unlike the Papacy. Gold thrones, y’all.
Truly, it should be known as Cesarism, not Machiavellianism.

Anyway, the rampant sexuality of the Cardinals, up to and including the Borgia Pope himself, have given it a reputation that continues to this day with paedophilia scandals (women were banned from most of the Vatican).
“At present, Vatican City is the only country where men but not women have voting rights.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Alexander_VI

Therefore his Italianized Valencian surname, Borgia, became a byword for libertinism and nepotism, which are traditionally considered as characterizing his pontificate.

I mean, there are books about this stuff. Do I need to keep linking fact or can we crack on?

TLDRBooks: Cesare caught syphilis in 1497. It might’ve made him more evil, a feat supposedly possible.

To avoid going into hiding like possibly, literally Hitler, he wore “a leather mask covering half his face (disfigured possibly by syphilis during his late years).”

If only men weren’t crazy about pussy, eh? Far more evidence they’re the hysterical ones, isn’t there?

Maybe that’s why we call it his-story? It’s the story of STDs, r-selected men being the primary carriers.

Fast forward to Henry VIII. He had the ‘French Disease’, syphilis. Nobody knows quite how, he got around. Is it a hint if I hyperlink?
To escape France and it’s pimp hand, The Pope, Henry formed the Church of England (colloquially C of E), which doesn’t hate women, allowed him to marry a prettier one, allows the book of Common Prayer in a common tongue and doesn’t take all your beer money overseas to keep the sexual deviant who gave you The French Disease in silken socks.

Allegedly.

This would explain why Elizabeth wanted to keep her wits about her and remain a Virgin Queen.

The nobles shared prostitutes and wives, they were pretty much all infected with something.
That’s why their babies kept dying. On top of everything.

Who worked for this French deviant? Why, Leonardo!
Who might Anne Boleyn have met at the French court? Leonardo, again.

Where does syphilis spread fastest? Well, much like HIV, homosexuality in men, again.
We do know a direct descendant was of that persuasion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_III_of_France#Sexuality
And we all know the French court was decadent, almost manic, grandiose and well, a bit loopy.

Symptoms of the French Disease.

Mad King Georgey had some type of ailment but nobody can pinpoint what exactly.
Seemed a little bipolar, mouth watering,, difficulty seeing, bit loopy…
Syphilis is also known as the ‘great imitator’, looking like many diseases to the untrained eye.
It’s a matter of psychiatry in the latter stages. This didn’t exist.

Where did this dread disease come from? Why did it suddenly get through Europe?

Well, the French disease, isn’t French. It was actually brought back by Columbus’ crew from America.

Why can’t men keep it in their pants, seriously? That’s much worse than measles, smallpox and flu.
It’s the Renaissance HIV, it might’ve ended the Renaissance as we know it.

However, it took up permanent root in the French court swiftly (homosexuality marks out the French, free lovers) and might’ve been the hidden cause of the decadence that led the French people to guillotine them.

http://thisisversaillesmadame.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/sickness-of-shame-syphilis.html
Some of those symptoms may be familiar.

The court in which Louis XIV grew up in definitely saw syphilis as a sign of god’s wrath for a misspent life.

By 1736 the problem had become so imminent that Jean Astruc, royal physician to Louis XV, wrote one of his greater works on the disease.

It can be passed onto children if the pregnant mother catches it from the father.

Fast-forward again to the modern day.

It’s returning because middle-aged men can’t keep it in their pants. AGAIN.

It has come back to Europe, like TB, with mass immigration and promiscuity of former debauched eras.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233310/Syphilis-scourge-kings-dictators-old-surging-back.html

We are the age of super-gonorrhea. I’d suggest either of these as candidates for Gay Germ theory.

Thanks, Sexual Revolution!

The feminists lost the plot when they denied the unique female power of maternity. Men kill men, women kill their babies. Men kill their future babies and drive their women hysterical with STDs (see Lincoln’s wife).

The true sexual revolution were the libertines, extreme hedons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertine

They only came about after the introduction and spread of syphilis into Europe.

Wait, does Britain have a Mad King in modernity?

There is a rumour about Charlie’s adultery. A certain infection Camilla might’ve picked up at school that ravished her looks early… God’s wrath indeed.
https://www.occams-razor.info/2005/04/a_salute_to_rea.html
“There was also the obvious concern that the king or queen would not contract sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis, which was quite common through much of human history.”

I’ve written before on the fact STDs were considered evil because they were passed from whores to mothers, and on to babies, who they tend to murder. It’s like the male form of abortion. Lincoln’s children might’ve died because of his disease.

http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/camilla-parker-bowles-openly-mocks-princess-diana-prince-charles-condones-it-prince-william-prince-harry-would-be-mortified/

It’s almost impossible to keep any references to this online for long, but it’s spoken of quite openly in London.

“It wouldn’t surprise me.”

Syphilis produces many of its third-stage neurosyphilitic symptoms with physical degeneration. It is found by autopsy, physically.
One symptom is weakened impulse control e.g. Ivan the Terrible murdering his own son in a manic fit of rage (mixed episode, clinically). This is also called hypofrontality. Porn addiction can cause it too.

http://www.yourbrainonporn.com/garys-research-hypofrontality

Hypofrontality may be a temporary boon to creativity, a side effect of schizophrenia-like bursts of erratic mental energy, explaining the slutty artist who later loses it and tops himself.

https://subtleyoga.com/2015/02/19/neuroscience-hoga-yoga-helps-mental-health-part-6-transient-hypofrontality/

How many lefties love meditation and yoga?

The ‘mindless’ trend? Brainlessness, celebrated by these people?

Transient hypofrontality is an (obviously) technical term meaning large portions of your prefrontal cortex have deactivated and brain activity is now dancing around various circuits.

THAT IS NOT A GOOD THING.

No Noooooo are you kidding me wtf are you testing me satan

Frontal lobe is known to generally code for common sense, self-control, logic and reason.
Hypofrontality is heavily r-type, as a mode of cognition.

They don’t have anxiety, they likely have brain damage, by self-report.

I’ve leave you to these dark thoughts and hidden facts.

Throughout modern history, what if the women weren’t crazy? This idea only really came about during the Renaissance, when men became the lascivious ones.
What if they had an STD thanks to slutty hubby?
What if their own reasoning was twisted by the same?
What if this was passed through the seed?
What would be a great way to punish prideful man, that doesn’t keep monogamy or respect purity?

Drive his wife to madness and kill his babies.

I’m slightly ripping off Carlin here but he thought it was AIDs.
“maybe it could be spread sexually, making them a little reluctant to engage in the act of reproduction” source

We had syphilis originally, then HIV and now Ebola. All deadly STDs.
Who would be empty-headed enough to sleep around, despite these?

http://www.charismamag.com/life/women/27015-6-reasons-this-popular-meditation-trend-is-dangerous-for-christians

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Sins-of-the-Father/

Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation].

What could do that?

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

A microbe? A pathogen, maybe?
Between generations, biologically, that would mean sexually.

drinking tired of this shit michael fassbender

What would be a divine sign, if there were to be a plague on man?

The evolution of the natural world beyond the mastery of man.

Antibiotic resistance.

#mic drop#

Video: Jesus: The Revenge

“Do homage to the Son, that He not become angry, and you perish in the way, For His wrath may soon be kindled How blessed are all who take refuge in Him!”

Not a stylish sandal-wearing baby-faced hippy pacifist.

Best comment;

JESUS IS BACK AND HE’S NOT CRUCIFUCKIN AROUND

It’s a wonder there isn’t a video game along these lines with all the adult stuff only and making all the rest heavily sarcastic, with a hidden level like you have to secretly stop them making Christians into candles and sneak in Assassin’s Creed style by headbutting a Centurion and bitchslapping a lion. Someone call Mel Gibson!