TOLD YA SO
but race is a social construct?
What if I identify as Jewish? Do I get reparations?
TOLD YA SO
but race is a social construct?
What if I identify as Jewish? Do I get reparations?
invasion but mmk
“Zemmour is in London as part of his still undeclared campaign to be the next president of France — to curry favour with and raise money from the many French voters who live in the capital. But the British Establishment has given him a cold reception. Mayor Sadiq Khan said he wasn’t welcome. The Royal Institution cancelled his event. The government ordered Conservatives to call off meetings with him. That could be because Boris Johnson hopes to repair badly damaged relations with Emmanuel Macron, the man Zemmour wants to eject from the Élysée Palace. Or it could just be that Mr Z is considered so right wing as to be toxic.”
Anti-immigration wankers being immigrants themselves.
Maybe THAT is your problem?
Like when Pettibone moved to Germany to complain about immigrants… like herself.
The Bible says we must not be a hypocrite.
Team Zemmour argue that the Tories have missed a trick. A President Zemmour would be far less antagonistic to Brexit Britain than President Macron. Zemmour is officially against ‘Frexit’, yet he is complimentary, even a touch romantic about Britain’s decision to leave the European Union. ‘The conservative elites, at least some of them, are proud to have respected the choice of the British people, unlike the French political elites,’ he says, speaking in French because his English is limited. He compares Brexit with France’s referendum in 2005, when the French said ‘non’ to the European Constitution, only to be ignored. ‘That was disgraceful. I find the behaviour of the British elites much more noble.’
So you still have kings? And we still haven’t left the EU. They won’t let us. The vaxport shit is an excuse for an EU-wide ID.
When the vaxwankers say just following orders, still hang them, but a better question to ask first is WHOSE ORDERS?
Now he’s saying invasion is only ok if you have a “fisherboat” that happens to contain a nice little machine gun (why we didn’t shoot them I do not know, they literally had a gun aimed at our countrymen in our waters and were mocking them). I can’t find the exact story but it was DM.
He’s quick to add that he finds it ‘cruel’ of Britain to have withheld licences from French fisherman over waters they’ve trawled for centuries. ‘I don’t think this “fair”, as you like to say in England,’ he says, amusing himself with the quaint Anglo–Saxonness of the notion. ‘I find it “unfair”.’ He also blames Macron for ‘negotiating very badly’ and throws in a swipe at Michel Barnier, the chief Brexit negotiator and another candidate in the 2022 French presidential election: ‘He showed his limitations there. It’s incredible that he left the issue hanging in the air and did not deal with it.’
This man is not even French. Fake Ks. Told ya.
What’s fair is shooting an invading boat containing a gun threatening our citizens in their own national waters. Those are not your waters. You over-fished your waters selling to the EU instead of your own people and are now screwing ours.
This is why I don’t trust the fake Right.
So many immigrants living here have zero genetic claim, like you’ll see a German with an Asian.
Didn’t we fight WW2 to STOP invasion by those two? This is why race mixing was illegal too, the Bible but also national security. Look at all the Chinese honeypot waifus, like Hunt’s Ting Tong. It’s the fakest sounding meeting story I ever heard, we all know they probably met in a massage parlour and the guy was loudly bitching that his kid was ugly. Well, yeah. He looks like his mother, kids are gonna pick on the fug kid. It isn’t even a race thing.
Marrying someone without seeing photos of them prior to cosmetic surgery should be illegal. But they chose to self-cuck so sucks to be you.
Unless you deport the ones already here (AND the anchor babies used by spies) then don’t bother.
Fishing is one problem; cross-Channel illegal immigration quite another. What would President Zemmour do to stop the growing number of migrant boats from France arriving on Britain’s shores? ‘I’ll tell you what: if I were president, they would not arrive in Calais.’ He says the Le Touquet agreement, through which Britain pays to support French border checkpoints, is ‘disrespectful’ to France. ‘We’re not a third-world country. I don’t understand why French governments accepted this. On the other hand, these people… should not enter France. We should do every-thing possible to dissuade them.
I would expel these people and I would suppress all social aid so that they would not be tempted to come any more…
I saw your Home Secretary say — and she is absolutely right — that France should better control its border.’He’s officially against ‘Frexit’, yet he is a touch romantic about Britain’s decision to leave the European Union
He’s clearly read me.
Actually, pull a California Exit Tax and force them to pay it all back – plus interest. All the schooling, healthcare, housing etc. That’s the only way. Banning inter-continental or inter-religious marriages would also work. Like, you love the foreign so much? Move over THERE, then. They have no right to bring back a Thai proz and infect the home country. Flee sexual immorality.
Just get the Army involved to defend the country from any and all invasion, battleships style. At least the Germans weren’t cowardly enough to take their toddlers to D-Day.
Then there’s camps for the hotel people. The 5 star hotel people. I’ve never stayed in one, why are my taxes paying for them? Literal criminals. Hold them in camps. We have mega prisons, we can do it.
We’re now on to the issue that drives Zemmour’s political mission and fuels his incendiary campaign. ‘Immigration is war,’ he says, hitting his rhetorical stride. ‘They want to invade our European countries. That’s all. It’s nothing else. It’s war.’
Invasions do not require weapons. How’s that for a meme?
The ultimate aim of invasions is NOT war – it is taking money from the nation’s people (welfare and taking jobs, check) and breeding with the natives (willingly or rape, check).
Immigration is a rebrand of invasion, by definition.
Macron, he goes on, is gripped by ‘an individualistic ideology. He thinks every individual is basically the same and can live everywhere. Of course, he will enforce rules here and there, but fundamentally…the existence of peoples to him seems outdated.’
You can see why Darwin was a Christian, describing God’s creation.
God made races, kept them apart. Evolution is accounting for that genetic variance, well or poorly. Multi-Regional Hypothesis points to God, that’s why SJWs hate it and keep tacking on asterisks to the failed Out of Africa model. I’ve written about this here before. Race is a Darwinian classification in biology, even Vox believes in it while denying evolution wholesale like an SJW. The mixed are mongrels, in Origin of the Species. Race is an exclusive term, they don’t have one, they are raceless. This explains modern mental health findings even in rich half-Asians. Read the sodding book already. If it were secular, the SJWs would teach it in schools.
There was a Frenchman who had a book about family structure and how it evolved differently by races. It’s out of print, bring it back? You need to. It needs to be taught in schools. Culture is genetic. This proves it.
The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems
HBD ignores this because many of them advocate adulterating their blood out of reprobate lust.
This book PROVES they will NEVER assimilate (the ghetto in America still exists, centuries later).
“Does he blame the economic liberalism of Thatcher and Reagan for the excessive individualism to which Macron subscribes? ‘I wouldn’t say that,’ he replies. ‘It’s more a deviation from Christian humanism. As Chesterton said: “It’s Christian virtues gone mad.”’
Tolerance has never been a virtue, it’s always been a Christian weakness. Flee immorality.
Tolerance is a Satanic virtue. Live and let live, love is love (even when it’s child abuse). Hate the sin, not the sinner blame-shifting, absolving them of accountability.
I don’t trust this guy, until he cites that book. Immigration is founded on a lie: assimilation.
Zemmour prefers the English word ‘globalisation’ to the French ‘mondialisation’ to describe this process. ‘It’s an alliance of left and right,’ he says. ‘Above all it is cowardice.’ By that he means that European leaders have been weak in refusing to tackle the social and political ills concomitant with globalisation. ‘For 40 years they’ve been afraid to confront the politically correct, afraid of riots in suburbs, afraid of being seen in a bad light by the media, afraid of not obeying the judges.’
Longer, the lynching of the pedo Jew in America and Jack the Ripper outing himself as a Jew and the police covered it up.
Woke is anti-white genocide rhetoric, mentacide/menticide intended to make them cow long enough to import a strong invading force to take over. It’s a temporary tactic, not the whole strategy.
Thought Prison, read it.
“This wokeness, he argues, is a kind of Trojan horse for the Islamification of formerly Christian nations. ‘It is by destroying our cultures, our history, that they make a clean sweep of all that and allow a foreign culture, history and civilisation to come and replace it.’”
Replacement is genocide, call it. UN definition of genocide.
c) is also financial like stopping natives from reproducing because they’re funding out-group families. d) includes housing limits and so on.
I hear the Muslim taking over shit, from Muslims in the manosphere. Their IQ is too low, it’ll never happen. Think about it.
And how will they feed themselves?
Cold countries have stronger selection pressures than hot ones. When all the white people are gone, they’ll starve. They are temporary shock troops to eliminate Whitey. Useful inbred idiots. The rising popularity of Islam across Asia (hey expats, don’t lose your head) PROVES that Asians are not smart. I have seen zero retardation studies on half-Asians from the manosphere yet they claim these kids are fine. Youtube supports manosphere content, that should be a tell. Look at the national IQs, the ones that don’t fake transcripts and speak broken English at MIT. Genetics is destiny, the kids are NOT ok.
I believe this fellow has been reading me. No particular reason.
Meme is from 2018.
Such talk — echoing as it does ‘the great replacement theory’ of Renaud Camus — causes consternation in progressive circles. Somebody, probably David Aaronovitch, will no doubt accuse The Spectator of giving a platform to nativism or white supremacism merely by speaking to him. Yet Zemmour is utterly unabashed about his views and he’s currently second or third in the presidential election polls.
Nativism is the birthright of the population, yes. Like capitalism is the birthright of the producer. Nativism is inheritance of labour from one’s own blood, exclusively. Anything less is theft and invasion. There is no AA between races.
Thou shalt not steal.
Arguing genocide is ok is actually illegal.
They are complicit and inciting the genocide of the native races.
ACCORDING TO THE UN DEFINITION WRITTEN BECAUSE OF THE NAZIS.
Nationalism against the rules written because of the Nazis is not the same, literally at all.
Do you think English people would’ve been spared in Nazi Germany either? Heil no! They weren’t racially conscious at all. I’d be as dead as the average Yid. Do you think we dunno this?
Might his preoccupations with national characteristics, the greatness of French literature and the collapse of western civilisation have something to do with the fact that he is himself an immigrant child? His parents were Berber Jews from Algeria. His grandfather spoke better Arabic than French. His father drove an ambulance.
This is why you need laws against mixing.
No further comment needed.
‘What my family has done in terms of assimilating French culture should be an example,’ he says, proudly. ‘I am a product of French colonialisation. I am not one of these people who condemn the French coloniser. I say thank you.
While he wishes to rule you and eliminate his own competition.
His final action in office should be to self-deport.
Assimilation is a myth.
He IS the coloniser by definition. What a gaslight.
What the so-called Alt Right refuses to acknowledge is that the Asians invaded first. Hey, they gave us Black Death. We had Chinatown before the Jewish influx and in the Edwardian Era they gave San Fran plague. Literal plague again.
The Pacific Coast race riots of 1907 were a series of riots against both Americans and Canadians of Asian descent that took place within the United States and Canada. The riots, which resulted in violence and destruction of property, were the result of anti-Asian tension caused by white opposition to the increasing Asian population during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Most notable riots that took place were in San Francisco, California; Bellingham, Washington; and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Each city and anti-Asian activist group claimed its own unique reasoning for their specific riots, which were encouraged by the Asiatic Exclusion League.
Even Vox hasn’t mentioned this. History was more based than all of you. If the race traitors went back to those times and claimed to be traditional, they’d be lynched. Remember, mixing was illegal, treason still is. The crimes are related and Biblical. Honour thy family by not mongrelizing.
The Buckland riot was an anti-Chinese race riot that occurred on 4 July 1857, in the goldfields of the Buckland Valley, Victoria, Australia, near present-day Porepunkah. At the time approximately 2000 Chinese and 700 European migrants were living in the Buckland area.
The Chinese are the Jews of Asia, everyone hates them but it’s apparently never their fault.
Yet they keep colonising places (currently Africa) and invite the Jews to follow shortly after. Business buddies. In cahoots. Every time. Undeniable.
The Lambing Flat Riots (1860-1861) were a series of violent anti-Chinese demonstrations that took place in the Burrangong region, in New South Wales, Australia. They occurred on the goldfields at Spring Creek, Stoney Creek, Back Creek, Wombat, Blackguard Gully, Tipperary Gully, and Lambing Flat.
Do you think history will smile on the current cucks?
You know the Chinks are bad if they cause a team-up effort!
19 Chinese immigrants were killed, 15 of whom were later hanged by the mob in the course of the riot, but most of whom had already been shot to death before being hanged. At least one was mutilated, when a member of the mob cut off a finger to obtain the victim’s diamond ring. Those killed represented over 10% of the small Chinese population of Los Angeles at the time, which numbered 172 prior to the massacre. Ten men of the mob were prosecuted and eight were convicted of manslaughter in these deaths. The convictions were overturned on appeal due to technicalities.
This is why the Asians America is importing are turning SJW, they made it. You think Black riots are bad? Wait until you see the Asian ones. Mark my words. Diversity + Proximity has zero exceptions.
Less than 200 in the whole place, was still enough to make people wanna kill them. Begs the Question, what are they doing?
DIVERSITY HIRING POLICIES ARE VICTORIAN!
The Rock Springs massacre, also known as the Rock Springs Riot, occurred on September 2, 1885, in the present-day United States city of Rock Springs in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. The riot, and resulting massacre of immigrant Chinese miners by white immigrant miners, was the result of racial prejudice toward the Chinese miners, who were perceived to be taking jobs from the white miners.
The Union Pacific Coal Department found it economically beneficial to give preference in hiring to Chinese miners, who were willing to work for lower wages than their white counterparts, angering the white miners. When the rioting ended, at least 28 Chinese miners were dead and 15 were injured. Rioters burned 78 Chinese homes, resulting in approximately US$150,000 in property damage (equal to $4.32 million in 2020 terms).
I’m more Trad American than all the PC Americans hating on me for pointing out these people are bad for you, historically, biologically and eternally. It’s a fact. Immigration is treason, it betrays the native worker. Ironically, Marxists should oppose it. Labour used to.
You cannot absorb a billion people, that’s genocide, dipshits.
There were Victorian race riots all the time, like in East London. We aren’t taught them at school. Immigration has never worked, even at less than 1% levels in the most economically stable time periods of our history, high family formation, religion and birth rates.
The problem definitely isn’t us and the correlation to lower living standards as their numbers rise prove the hypothesis.
This organized action became known as the “Tacoma method”, and despite national and international outcry, it was used as an example of how to forcibly remove Chinese residents from cities and towns throughout the American West. The anti-Chinese sentiment in Tacoma and Washington Territory more broadly made it so that those involved did not face repercussions for their actions.
Who owns America? They weren’t deported from the country. Why?
It’s like teacher’s unions shipping around pedos.
Just read it.
Race riots in England date back to 1221. It will never, ever work.
When a rumour spread that Richard had ordered all Jews to be killed, the people of London attacked the Jewish population. Many Jewish homes were destroyed by arsonists, and several Jews were forcibly converted. Some sought sanctuary in the Tower of London, and others managed to escape. Among those killed was Jacob of Orléans, a respected Jewish scholar. Roger of Howden, in his Gesta Regis Ricardi, claimed that the jealous and bigoted citizens started the rioting, and that Richard punished the perpetrators, allowing a forcibly converted Jew to return to his native religion. Baldwin of Forde, Archbishop of Canterbury, reacted by remarking, “If the King is not God’s man, he had better be the devil‘s”.
The will has always been there.
And the Kings hate us. That king was an immigrant himself. Prince William is immigrant blood, including a little Indian. And you wonder why they’re pro-immigration?
Offended that he was not being obeyed and realising that the assaults could destabilise his realm on the eve of his departure on crusade, Richard ordered the execution of those responsible for the most egregious murders and persecutions, including rioters who had accidentally burned down Christian homes. He distributed a royal writ demanding that the Jews be left alone. The edict was only loosely enforced, however, and the following March further violence occurred, including a massacre at York.
Who ruled us? The king was scared of the debtors. A supposedly Christian king killed some of the Christians for completing his orders, then pretended to go off and fight for Christianity. They’re not the same religion and they were following his orders, or so they thought. So was the Jew right and he favoured a foreign religion over his own Christian subjects? Or were they lying about that too? The rhetoric is nearly a millennium old. Are the words like bigot that old? I see no quote.
But the Bible calls for the bigotry of being the only religion. It is a commandment.
Divine right of Kings is Christian, therefore anti-Jew, Muslim, Hindu and anything else!
You convert them or kill them if you’re the agent of the Christian God’s will on Earth. It’s your job.
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning. 3Through Him all things were made, and without Him nothing was made that has been made. 4In Him was life, and that life was the light of men. 5The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcomea it.
Neoreaction was too dumb to pick this up.
A King denying this part of the Bible is no King because he is no Christian.
Nobody goes to the Father except through Jesus, if a King deserves to be our Christian servant of God, he acts on this.
THEREFORE, IMMIGRATION IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN. You cannot be legitimate subjects of a Christian monarchy unless you are a Christian. Race aside, religion alone proves it. They are heathens, and the Bible says to banish them from your KINGDOM, if not kill them. Banish = deport.
Just as the LORD delighted to prosper and increase you, so now the LORD will delight to destroy, exterminate, and banish you from the land that you are about to enter to possess.”
However, I will leave some of these wicked people alive and banish them to other places. But wherever these people who survive may go, they will wish they had died rather than lived,” says the Lord who rules over all.
God supports deportation.
The Lord said, “This is how the Israelites will eat their bread—ceremonially unclean—among the nations where I will banish them.”
EZEKIEL IS A JEWISH HOLY BOOK. THEY KNOW DEPORTATION IS HOLY.
(unless they’re faking being Jewish and Synagogue of Satan)
God has no evil in Him, all things He does are right, just, good and HOLY.
Therefore, deportation from a Christian Kingdom is HOLY.
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Non-Christians are all going to Hell. All of them. It’s right there. Unless the cucks know Christianity better than Christ! Cease adding to the Word.
You can’t spell patriotism without riot, kids.
….They’re gonna rip that off, aren’t they?
What a meme.
ONE FOR THE MEME DREAM TEAM
There was also a riot for men’s suffrage so if the manosphere could shut up like women were the first, or they’d be given any ‘rights’ in their wet dream version of multicultural Brotherhood history, that’d be great, thanks!
Sincerely, people who actually read.
p.s. If women couldn’t vote, the Left would eternally win, so you’d have to man up and defend the country and could no longer blame us. We still win. You couldn’t tax us either, threaten me with a good time.
So this fake French guy is pretending it was a problem in our lifetime. Er, literally how?
He doesn’t mention that Western culture is Christian culture, so I’m saying controlled ops.
The mixers and colonisers will never recover from what they’ve wrought.
Evil will slay the wicked; the foes of the righteous will be condemned.
NO further comment.
The core strategy paper China and the Jewish People: Old Civilizations in a New Era was published back in 2004.
1000+ years of Sino-Jewish relations
It’s always the weebs. Look at Zuck. Look long and hard.
They always turn on their own. You fed the crocodile.
9:20 they used my meme.
That’s hilarious. Next time address this one
They couldn’t keep the lid on the “Jewish” connection, huh?
While eventually anyone of high IQ was targeted for having weird books and there was a tragic genocide of innocent people based on IQ weirdness or plain envy, I have no doubt there were actual Satanists also hanged for abusing, corrupting or attempting to steal children, which obviously goes unmentioned here. Witches are Pagan, Satanists are monotheist, worshipping Satan as their One god. A woman who likes her herbal tea isn’t a problem, they provided our medicine for millennia. The evil use and concept of witch only arrived in medieval Europe with so-called Jews… Lilith in the Jewish theology (NOT Christian because it violates Genesis) was said to steal children (to eat them) and blood libel has been suspected in many cases of Jewish serial killers, from that recent creepy comic book guy who kosher slaughtered his ‘girlfriend’ to drain her blood (it’s a ritual sacrifice) back to Jack the Ripper and the first immigrant case covered up (wall erasure) to prevent riots by the PC.
Canaanites are not real Jews in my opinion but I could be wrong, Revelations is vague. The witch trials sought Canaanites (what we’d now call pedophiles), NOT people minding their own business (although con artists did accuse innocent people, inc. men).
The hats are 1. phallic 2. sinister 3. connected to a religion that mutilates babies 4. similar to obelisk, an occult symbol relating to Masons 5. wizards were said to hide things, like Mary Poppins’ bag. This is why magicians pull things out of hats and a reason top hats fell out of favour, suggesting Satanism due to use by Satanists like Houdini (it’s in the eyes).
In the will of A. A. Springs was the list of his property. it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included his children. Mr. Christopher, and others, were looking to find what railroads and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son, Leroy Springs. He didn’t find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century. On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father, A. A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher and the others with him couldn’t believe what they were seeing, but there it was the name of the son and it was “ABRAHAM LINCOLN!”
“In the late spring of the year of 1808 Nancy Hanks, who was of the family lineage of the McAdden family was visiting some of her family in the community of Lincolnton, North Carolina. While on her stay with family in the Carolina’, she visited with many of the neighboring families that she had known for many years; one such visit was the Springs family. The sordid details had been omitted but obviously the young Nancy Hanks had found herself in a compromised position and was forced to succumb to the lust of A.A. Springs. She became pregnant as a result. There were no details of a love affair or an act of violence on a helpless female. Abraham Lincoln was the result of that act, which leads one to wonder if the name ‘Lincoln’ was real or a fabricated name for the are of conception was ‘Lincolnton.’ Was there really a Thomas Lincoln? Since the ‘Spring’ were of the race that called themselves Jewish, that made Lincoln part Jewish and as part of the Springs family, he also became a relative of the Rothschild family by blood.”
Explains the gay (circumcised men prefer unnatural sex) and so the syphilis (which his wife went mad from). Another reason they had to off him. Syphilitics talk. Look how much Henry VIII rebelled after getting it from Anne Boleyn’s sister (at least he got his own back by murdering the sister, a tad unfair but there you go). No wonder Elizabeth wanted nothing to do with the diseased, literally mad men.
No excuse to throw her in a loony bin after catching it from an adulterous husband. Great revenge against a degenerate father pathologically obsessed with descendants (the fruit of his loins, no coincidence). He probably couldn’t conceive a healthy son because of the STDs, ironically. You think they didn’t know this? It also messes with impulse control like say…. over-eating. Exercise encourages its progression.
Amazing how many Presidents are actually related. And you don’t have a monarchy, huh? Why is everything so shit?
Yeah, the evil English must be oppressing you, your fellow white rulers are fine.
Things are so much better demographically since you abandoned the motherland.
If you’re a Jew.
Explains the persecution complex.
“Circumcision purifies and refines. It forces us to make a sacrifice. Removing the foreskin diminishes the pleasure and enjoyment of intercourse.1 We sacrifice such pleasure and proclaim that, on our scale, Divine instruction is a greater priority than self-gratification.2
Males could have been created without the foreskin, yet G‑d wanted us to remove it ourselves. This was to demonstrate that as we complete the physical appearance of our bodies, so can we perfect the contours of our personalities and the shapes of our souls.3″
Midrash Tanchumah, Tazriah 5 and Sefer Hachinuch, Mitzvas Milah (The anonymous author, who identifies himself only as “a Levite from Barcelona,” was a student of the Rashba, Rabbi Shlomo ben Aderet, in the thirteenth century). Our sages further taught that circumcision is an offering to G‑d that, like a sacrifice, atones for inherent human weaknesses (Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 29).
Classical Jewish thought has long maintained this position. However, contemporary scientific studies on this matter have failed to produce conclusive evidence either way.
Maimonides in his Guide for the Perplexed, v. III, ch. 29. See also R. Bachye on Genesis 17:13.
Sacrificing your own kids…. but not to Moloch, don’t be silly!
“This work involves both milah, cutting the thick foreskin, and priyah, ripping open the thin membrane, which on a spiritual plane alludes to the subduing of our material desires.25 Afterwards, one must perform metzitzah (sucking out the blood), thus removing the excitement generated by material things from one’s body as a whole.”
Doesn’t sound Satanic at all…. they totally don’t need that spiritual energy…. but ‘priests’ need to do it, not surgeons or anyone with medical training and pain relief.
I covered previously studies of the medical damage involved, ripping out nerve bundles.
As a consequence, a husband cannot emotionally bond with his wife (Jewish men are oddly notorious for cheating) nor the wife with the husband (see satisfaction studies).
“How we relate to G‑d affects how we relate to other people. That is Hosea’s message – and vice versa: how we relate to other people affects the way we think of G‑d. Israel’s political chaos in the eighth century bce was intimately connected to its religious waywardness. A society built on corruption and exploitation is one where might prevails over right. That is not Judaism but idolatry, Baal-worship.
Now we understand why the sign of the covenant is circumcision, a commandment given in Tazria. For faith to be more than the worship of power, it must affect the most intimate relationship between men and women. In a society founded on covenant, male-female relationships are built on something other and gentler than male dominance, masculine power, sexual desire and the drive to own, control and possess. Baal must become ish. The alpha male must become the caring husband. Sex must be sanctified and tempered by mutual respect. The sexual drive must be circumcised and circumscribed so that it no longer seeks to possess and is instead content to love.”
Anti-men rhetoric, you again…. Is that ish like Ishtar?
Whereas Christians see husbands AS alpha males…. as does biology, because the alpha male is part of a monogamous breeding pair with an alpha female. There’s no such thing as a single alpha male.
“The foreskin of the male reproductive organ effects his experience of marital relations in two ways: it increases his gross sensual pleasure and decreases his sensitivity to his wife by insulating him from her to a certain extent. By removing the foreskin, the experience of marital relations becomes for the man less of a narcissistic indulgence and more of a true spiritual coupling between him and his wife. Once the spiritual dimension of marital relations is allowed into the picture, it enhances the physical dimension as well. The sages of the Talmud therefore state that ideally, at least, it is the Jewish couple that experiences the truest enjoyment in marital relations.”
Satisfaction studies have disabused them of this notion.
“As originally created, the physiology of woman was such that she did not have a menstrual cycle, and the process of conceiving and giving birth did not involve any bleeding. Nor did she bleed when she first engaged in marital relations. These (as well as other) facets of life were introduced into reality as the result of the primordial sin.”
Myth, that isn’t how hymens work. Some women aren’t even born with one. You might as well appeal to humours in healthcare. Not even wrong. Why is it always a man talking about female anatomy and periods? Sit down, shut up.
It isn’t even the hymen capable of that bleeding, it’s the friction of the vagina (and its heavy blood supply) that is capable of bleeding profusely (in virgins or non-), which must be worse/more likely when the man has no idea how to make her wet in the first place (inexperienced or incompetent lovers) and has no foreskin to reduce friction naturally.
Satan really is deceiving them.
“When a man has been circumcised of his gross sensual approach to marital relations, he retains more control over his sexual passion, and is thus less likely to succumb to them. His circumcision thus helps him not engage in forbidden marital relations, including relations with his wife during her period.”
If blood is the issue, he couldn’t screw his wife during normal spotting or pregnancy spotting, nor if she were ‘bleeding’ miniscule amounts (no blood supply) from the hymen as a virgin.
Frigidity isn’t possible with women, but the impotence (ED or whatever other term) does occur in mutilated men, as you’d also expect with mutilated women.
They hate their sons, duh.
“Circumcision is a tangible reminder to all men that they are the masters of their bodies, that they are in control of their sexual urges.”
Gaslighting from a mother who hates you but likes her own prepuce where it is. It’s funny their demon is a sexy woman (Lilith) not a part of Christian lore. They are not master of their body, their mother is. Maybe Freud wanted his mother to get his foreskin back.
“Cutting back the foreskin represents tapering the self-centered nature of lust. It’s not only about me, but about another person’s dignity and desires. It’s not all about the pleasure that I want, but about the pleasure that G‑d wants me to have.”
This is written by a woman. Clearly.
“Perhaps this reasoning behind circumcision can account for the Talmud’s statement that women are born naturally circumcised. Generally speaking, a woman’s nature is not to dominate someone whom she desires. Studies show that female sexual predators make up such a small percentage that there is little known about them as a group.1 Although women may have many imperfections, it seems that they are naturally less in danger of violating the dignity of others through their lustful impulses.”
Then why are most rapists circumcised, when it’s measured?
“Both men and women are entrusted to serve G‑d with dignity and consciousness. At the core of this service is the challenge to infuse meaning into the most mundane aspects of our life. To imprint the covenant on our physical body. And perhaps it is in this arena that women are naturally gifted. This gift of “natural circumcision”—the perspective of fluidity between the holy and the mundane—empowers (and obligates) women to become leaders. In the era preceding the global redemption, when the schism between what is worldly and what is G‑dly will vanish, feminine leadership is vital.”
Women also have a prepuce. It evolved in both sexes for biological purposes, including pleasure.
Does she own shares in a lube company?
She basically admits that partially castrating men keeps them in line as husbands (less adultery, in theory*) and makes them less masculine (well, yeah). That isn’t FOR them….
*Since they can’t bond with the wife, they seek other people.
Also, the American divorce rate is tied to circumcised men. As they get older and “need” Viagra (like Israel, how odd!) they start to doubt the wife’s attractiveness, as does she, causing separation.
A guy says about “rupturing the hymen” as women’s circumcision in the comments…. no. Not how it works. In the rare cases a woman has no gaps in hers, it must be surgically perforated to allow menstrual blood out. It goes from an antibacterial barrier for the safety of a baby to ….a more flexible antibacterial barrier. It only disappears from easy sight once a woman has given birth for the first time. Even in virgins (say a nun), it does break down over time, it isn’t just exercise, time itself thins it because, again, no blood supply.
That’s why surgeons can cut it with a scalpel to release old menstrual blood and the girl won’t bleed to death.
It’s kinda like those extra fingers that naturally drop off.
Women aren’t even born with the same thickness of membrane, it ages uniquely between women, so this discussion is really stupid. Women aren’t all the same, medically!
Bear in mind, Jung bitterly referred to Freud’s work as “Jewish Psychology” after he left, because Freud generalised the problems of Jews (or normalised their pathologies) to all of humanity, falsely.
He was fundamentally intellectually dishonest, that is why a surgeon claimed to be the first psychiatrist.
Like, the aggression/low IQ link is somewhat known, but the circumcision/violent crime (especially rape) connection is almost unheard of….
What do the groups otherwise have in common?
This reads like something about Muslim slavers (sex slavery).
“the dismal history of how far too many of those cases have been assiduously concealed both from the public and from the police: how influential rabbis and community leaders have sided with the alleged abusers against their victims; how victims and witnesses of sexual abuse have been pressured, even threatened, not to turn to secular law enforcement for help; how autonomous Jewish ‘patrols,’ displacing the role of official police in some large and heavily religious Jewish neighbourhoods, have played an inglorious part in the history of cover-ups; … how some Jewish communities have even succeeded in manipulating law enforcement officials to protect suspected abusers.”
The likes of Kinsey were also frauds, previously covered and connected to sadistic pedophilia.
S&M used to be a pathology (as per Psychopathia Sexualis) but their ilk normalised it with postmodernism as an eccentric paraphilia. That isn’t strictly true, a paraphilia refers to objects and enjoying pain of others doesn’t meet the standard. They’ve also blocked “sexual sadist” and “sadistic personality” from entering the DSM (which would make it legally actionable) despite how Marquis de Sade types (read about his crimes) prevail in the modern day and forensic jurisprudence is powerless to label them.
The story has been told by Jeffrey Masson in The Assault on Truth: Freud’s Suppression of the Seduction Theory (1984). In 1895 and 1896, Freud, listening to his neurotic and hysterical patients, became convinced that most of them had suffered from traumatic sexual abuse in their childhood. The traumatic origin of “hysteria” (an overused diagnosis in those days) had already been discussed by neurologists, including Jean-Martin Charcot, whose conferences Freud had attended in Paris, and Hermann Oppenheim, who published in Berlin in 1889 a treatise on traumatic neuroses. Yet psychological traumas of sexual nature were rarely discussed openly. On the other hand, there were medical publications, known to Freud, documenting the frequency of violence on children, including sexual assaults, but they focused on the physical consequences. In April 1896, confident to have made a major breakthrough in psychiatry, Freud presented his findings to the Society for Psychiatry and Neurology in Vienna, his first major public address to his peers. His lecture met with total silence. According to Masson, Freud was urged never to publish it, lest his reputation be damaged beyond repair. He found himself isolated, but nevertheless published his paper, “The Aetiology of hysteria.”
Of course he did.
Freud wasn’t even the father of psychology, as is often claimed, it was the gentile Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt, a brilliant man.
He was conducting laboratory experiments into behavioural science (empirical) while Freud was a child.
Explain that, small hats.
Jewish “doctors” also told white women of the time they were oppressed by their husbands (especially since some men in those days were circumcised by concerned “doctors” and thus, dissatisfying to their wives – see below) and further, they were told they were too ‘frigid’ to be adulterers or fornicating whores and must remedy this aversion to promiscuity for their very sanity. That rhetoric continues to this day.
The Freemason and con artist quack salesman Holloway built a women’s college for the procurement of fresh meat and also an asylum for women who talked about all the Satanic abuse they suffered at the hands of powerful men, because that isn’t weird at all… then his wife suddenly died under suspicious circumstances and the building has known tunnels to places unknown… as well as a roof nobody is allowed to see on the tour. I’m sure they do nothing dodgy... but there’s a lot of Freemason symbology on the FRENCH styled castle if you go on the tour.
But the 1960s were seeded about half a century before, have no doubt.
If we take hysteria as a legitimate amygdala response to trauma, it cannot be definitively female, since plenty of boys are targeted by pedophiles (most pedos are male seeking male victims). Still, they toy with our language.
Some of Freud’s work is interesting e.g. inversion (cycle of abuse, projection) but don’t think for one minute he lacked motives.
It’s funny to watch Frasier and spot all the jokes in two categories: anti-white and childhood trauma.
It’s 90% of the show.
They’re really touchy if you point out no woman wants a man with a mutilated manhood:
“While some of the respondents commented that they thought the differences were in the men, not the type of penis, the consistency with which women felt more intimate with their unaltered partners is striking. Some respondents reported that the foreskin improved their sexual satisfaction, which improved the quality of the relationship. In addition to the observations of Maimonides in the 12th century, one survey found that marital longevity was increased when the male had a foreskin . Why the presence of the foreskin enhances intimacy needs further exploration.”
“The lower rates of fellatio, masturbation and anal sex among unaltered men  suggests that unaltered men may find coitus more satisfying .”
“”Clearly, the anatomically complete penis offers a more rewarding experience for the female partner during coitus…. Because these findings are of interest, the negative effect of circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner needs to be part of any discussions providing ‘informed consent’ before circumcision.”
They’ve been trying to destroy Christian marriages the same way their mothers destroyed theirs.
Circumcised men (partial castrati, technically) are impotent, the data’s in the link.
From top link:
Among other remarks, he suggests that children who aggress sexually other children do so as a result of having been sexually abused themselves: “children cannot find their way to acts of sexual aggression unless they have been seduced previously.”
True observation but…. how did he know?
Using Hollywood to spin seduction from predatory to complimentary lead to the pedophilia of various “rock stars” and actors. You can’t prove a negative. It blames the victim, gentile or child.
From the standpoint of Freud’s earlier theory—which he euphemistically called the “seduction theory”—his new theory of spontaneous infantile sexual fantasies can be seen as a projection, not unlike sex offenders’ tendency to blame their victims: the patients themselves are now accused of both sexual passion and murderous fantasies toward their parents. By repressing these self-generated impulses, says Freudian orthodoxy, they have created their own neuroses which may, in hysterics, take the forms of false memories of abuse.
“look what you made me do, sexy person” …savages
Sandor Ferenczi wrote in his diary in July 1932 that the Oedipus complex could well be “the result of real acts on the part of adults, namely violent passions directed toward the child, who then develops a fixation, not from desire [as Freud maintained], but from fear. ‘
Passion is a bad thing, whatever the publicity for the word. Read the Bible for more.
The First World has always rejected the excuse of “feels” for being bestial in sexual conduct. Jesus himself blames the lecher, lechery is a sin – existing in the vicinity of one is not.
Recently, a mother was shamed for not putting a bikini top on her child. …Why? What if a pedophile pinned her down, that’s still on the predator! Even if we did cordone off all attractive women and girls, the creeps would seek them out still. The r-solution is always protecting themselves from the responsibility for their own feels and acts.
His paper contains a number of important ideas confirmed by later research, such as the victims’ psychological “identification with the aggressor,” or “introjection”: “the aggressor disappears as external reality and becomes intrapsychic instead of extrapsychic,” so that even the guilt feelings of the aggressor are introjected. Ferenczi hypothesized that helplessness causes the victim to empathize with the aggressor, a process today known as “Stockholm syndrome”.
Why pedophiles claim their victims ‘love’ them.
Like serial killers who claim multiple women “made them” angry because they’re too weak to impulse control, so too is the sexual deviant and serial rapist (most acts of rape are re-offences by the same parties, SJWs dread mentioning this fact for fear we might not infantilise the predator and might not want them out in society after ‘rehab’, their deviant form of buying forgiveness from the church).
“Extreme adversity, especially fear of death,” may also trigger a premature development, for which Ferenczi uses the metaphor of “a fruit that ripens or becomes sweet prematurely when injured by the beak of a bird, or of the premature ripening of wormy fruit. Shock can cause a part of the person to mature suddenly, not only emotionally but intellectually as well.”
R-selection, deliberately depriving their future competition.
Creeps breed by predation, the young are just the softest prey. Most naive.
They actually never complete mental maturation, when the body skips ahead. Hinted here:
Such traumatic maturation happens at the expense of psychological integration, and Ferenczi brings in the notion of a personality split: “there can be no shock, no fright, without traces of a personality split.” In his personal diary, reflecting on a patient who cannot remember having been raped, but dreams of it ceaselessly, Ferenczi writes:
“I know from other analyses that a part of our being can ‘die’ and while the remaining part of our self may survive the trauma, it awakens with a gap in its memory. Actually it is a gap in the personality, because not only is the memory of the struggle-to-the-death effaced, but all other associatively linked memories disappear… perhaps forever.”
multiplicity, occurs in all people, rarely pathological
also why psychopaths are “nice” and oddly blank, like Bundy – to fit in better
still no excuse to commit offences, it doesn’t absolve the predator of criminal responsibility (the purpose of infantilisation)
actually, isn’t it funny offences went from rape and murder to saying certain words or ideas?
Pathological dissociation is a little different but various drugs pushed by the postmodern academics (most notably weed) produce dissociation on purpose then wonder why schizophrenia and brain retardation in development occurs during the critical windows.
….Secondly, and more importantly, why was Freud’s theory so successful, despite being long proven scientifically flawed, and its therapeutic value baseless?
They have an unspoken rule:
If it enables pedophiles, they keep it.
I’ve heard them discuss how we “cannot marginalise these groups” by “conforming to archaic notions of stigma”.
So stigma seems to be a keyword.
As if child abuse victims suffer no injury.
Well, the same sniff test passed with whores via the libertarian shitstains ignoring drug abuse, mental illness and suicide rates, so why wouldn’t they try it on?
They go after women first, then girls and boys, then finally the men too weak to stand up any of the other times. This is their MO, again and again.
First it’s “let your daughter strip”, then “let your grand-daughter ‘date’ age 12, by the way she’s on the Pill” and then “let your son be a drag dancer” and finally “by the way, we won’t let your grandson hit puberty because he glanced at a Barbie once”. The men who allow all those moral violations along the way and enable evil because they like the idea of brothels and porn are a pox on decency.
They don’t deserve to live in a First World society.
Most SJWs would cease to exist if men stood up to the moral rot at the ‘stripper’ stage. A lot of them secretly crave the old bans back on obscenity too, haven’t you noticed? They have a false moral consciousness. Hence their constant hand-flailing appeal for white men to “do something”.
We all know what.
Additional insight has been supplied by two books published almost simultaneously (1979), one in French and one in German, both translated in English in 1982: Marie Balmary, Freud and the Hidden Fault of the Father, and Marianne Krüll, Freud and His Father. Both draw extensively from Freud’s letters to Fliess, which document how Freud was led to his theoretical about-face by his introspective self-analysis. Balmary and Krüll point out that Freud undertook this self-analysis just after the death of his father Jacob. On November 2, 1896, ten days after his father’s death, Freud wrote to Fliess about a dream he had the night before the funeral, in which appeared a sign saying, “You are requested to close the eyes,” which he interpreted as referring to “one’s duty to the dead.” Yet on February 11, 1897, after mentioning that forced oral sex on children can result in neurotic symptoms, he adds: “Unfortunately, my own father was one of these perverts and is responsible for the hysteria of my brother (all of whose symptoms are identifications) and those of several younger sisters. The frequency of this circumstance often makes me wonder.” The following summer, he went through a depressive episode, and wrote on July 7: “I still do not know what has been happening to me. Something from the deepest depths of my own neurosis set itself against any advance in the understanding of the neuroses, and you have somehow been involved in it.” Soon after, September 21, he announced to his friend: “I want to confide in you immediately the great secret that has been slowly dawning on me in the last few months. I no longer believe in my neurotica [his seduction theory].” He gave as one explanation, “the surprise that in all cases, the father, not excluding my own, had to be accused of being perverse.” In the next letter, October 3, he wrote confidently that in the case of his own neurosis, “the old man plays no active part.” Finally, October 15, he referred to the Oedipus story:
“A single idea of general value dawned on me. I have found, in my own case too, [the phenomenon of] being in love with my mother and jealous of my father, and I now consider it a universal event in early childhood.”
Narcissists assume everyone is like them, nobody may experience life differently (key to critical theory) and the Jewish temperament never ceases to amaze with its grandiosity.
As always, it starts with a deadbeat.
Balmary and Krüll bring in the equation a recent biographical discovery of Jacob Freud’s less than perfect behavior; a forgotten second wife named Rebecca, who mysteriously disappears, possibly by suicide, at the time of Jacob’s marriage with his third wife, the beautiful Amelia Nathansohn, half his age and already pregnant of Sigmund (a fact Jacob tried to conceal by falsifying Sigmund’s date of birth). In light of post-Freudian developments in transgenerational depth-psychology, it is possible that Freud had from early age an intuitive sense of a “hidden fault of the father” linked to his own identity, which may have combined with memories of his father’s sexual abuse on himself and his brother and sisters.
The only true pansexual is, like the rapist god Pan, a pedophile.
During his self-analysis at the age of 40, the whole thing came knocking at the door of his consciousness, but he finally surrendered to the subconscious imperative to “close the eyes.” To cover-up the menacing truth of his father’s faults, Freud invented the Oedipus complex, charging children themselves of “polymorphous perversion.”
“What was the girl in Rotherham wearing?”
Classic predator behaviour.
Chastise people in the First World for being free, especially if white.
Thus, in the complete myth, Oedipus’ predestination to kill his father and marry his mother is not determined by his own impulses, but by the fault of his father. For Balmary, Freud’s ignorance of this part of the myth reveals and symbolizes his own blind spot, his failure to discover the secret guilt of the father—both his own father and, by consequence, the fathers of his neurotic and hysterical patients.
Neither Masson not Balmary deal with the Jewish aspect of the issue. Marianne Krüll hints that the father’s mandate to “close the eyes” was a question of “filial piety on which, ultimately, the entire Jewish tradition is based” (Krüll, p. 178), but, although Jewish herself, she does not insist on that aspect.
An aspect of all shitty societies – Chinese oppression, Muslim abuse, Jewish abuse….
How about don’t be a shithead to your kids? How about that?
In other words, comments Cuddihy, Freud “proposes a theory to explain the play’s power over him and to make ‘intelligible’ why he should identify so deeply with its hero, Oedipus. It is in the course of that effort that the core of the theory of psychoanalysis is born.”
Rationalization. Absolute bullshit dressed up in fancy words.
Americans continue this tradition to this day and your replication suffers because of it.
bears an uncanny resemblance with another story that had made a lasting impression on Freud a few years earlier, as he explained in The Interpretation of Dreams. This is a story that his father, a shtetl Jew from Moravia—where Sigmund was born—, had told him when he was ten or twelve years old,
“to show how much better things were now than they had been in his days. ‘When I was a young man,’ he said, ‘I went for a walk one Saturday in the streets of your birthplace; I was well dressed, and had a new cap on my head. A Christian came up to me and with a single blow knocked off my cap into the mud and shouted: ‘Jew! get off the pavement!’ ‘And what did you do?’ I asked. ‘I went into the roadway and picked up my cap,’ was his quiet reply. This struck me as unheroic conduct on the part of the big, strong man who was holding the little boy by the hand.
Bluffing is huge.
Glibness of a psychopath, call it what you will.
“Freud presumably experienced not only this rage and shame, but guilt about the rage and shame. He quickly ‘censored’ these unacceptable feelings, unacceptable to a dutiful son ostensibly proud of his father; he ‘repressed’ them. Years later he encounters Sophocles’ tragedy and it lays a spell on him.”
According to Cuddihy, the supposedly universal “Oedipus Complex” that Freud thought he discovered was in reality the veil of a characteristically Jewish complex of his time.
..we can appreciate how Cuddihy draws attention to the fact that Freud’s father—the father whom he felt compelled to exculpate, but toward whom he nevertheless experienced a murder wish—was a Jewish father recently immigrated from Yiddishland into the heart of European civilization.
And so the gamma self-destruction takes down the locals.
Most “psychoanalysis” is just bitchy stuff a gamma would come up with.
Literally “your mom” tier. Gaslighting a whole society.
Pathologizing the enemy like Communism did later….
In the preface for the Hebrew translation of Totem and Taboo, for example, asking himself rhetorically what is Jewish in his work, Freud answered: “a very great deal, and probably its very essence.” In a speech prepared for delivery at the B’nai B’rith Lodge in Vienna in 1926, Freud explained his motivation for joining thirty years earlier (1897):
“Whenever I have experienced feelings of national exaltation, I have tried to suppress them as disastrous and unfair, frightened by the warning example of those nations among which we Jews live.
integration is a myth yo
it’s fake news
But there remained enough to make the attraction of Judaism and the Jews irresistible, many dark emotional powers all the stronger the less they could be expressed in words, as well as the clear consciousness of an inner identity, the familiarity of the same psychological structure. … So I became one of you.”
birds of a feather
This statement is an excellent illustration of what Cuddihy calls “the ordeal of civility,” the struggle of every Jew who wishes to assimilate yet feels unable to overcome the “dark emotional powers” of his ancestral Jewishness, with its implicit imperative not to assimilate. Jewishness has much to do with what Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy calls those “invisible loyalties” that can bind a person to his ancestors, by an irresistible system of values, obligations and debts. The question is to what extent Freud’s psychoanalytical theory is the result of Freud’s surrender to those “dark emotional powers.”
We must take Freud seriously when he tells us, in The Interpretation of Dreams, that his own Jewishness took the form of an identification with Hannibal, and the fantasy of “taking vengeance on the Romans.” He went on to say:
“I myself had walked in Hannibal’s footsteps … Hannibal, with whom I had achieved this point of similarity, had been my favourite hero during my years at the Gymnasium; … Moreover, when I finally came to realize the consequences of belonging to an alien race, and was forced by the anti-Semitic feeling among my classmates to take a definite stand, the figure of the Semitic commander assumed still greater proportions in my imagination. Hannibal and Rome symbolized, in my youthful eyes, the struggle between the tenacity of the Jews and the organization of the Catholic Church. The significance for our emotional life which the anti-Semitic movement has since assumed helped to fix the thoughts and impressions of those earlier days. Thus the desire to go to Rome has in my dream-life become the mask and symbol for a number of warmly cherished wishes, for whose realization one had to work with the tenacity and single-mindedness of the Punic general, though their fulfillment at times seemed as remote as Hannibal’s life-long wish to enter Rome.”
The significance of this public confession, printed in 1899 for all the world to read, cannot be overestimated. Here Freud names as the driving force in his life the fantasy of entering Rome (the Christian world) and destroying it to avenge the Phoenicians (the Jews).
Wait, weren’t the Phoenicians practicing Satanic orgies, child rape and cannibalism?
It was a Babylon mystery cult, wasn’t it? There were so many it’s hard to keep up.
God destroys it over and over for a reason!
If Freud was deeply influenced by his Jewish background, so were the other founding members of the psychoanalytical movement. Dennis Klein writes in Jewish Origins of the Psychoanalytic Movement:
“From its beginning in 1902 to 1906, all 17 members were Jewish. The full significance of this number lies again in the way their viewed themselves, for the analysts were aware of their Jewishness and frequently maintained a sense of Jewish purpose and solidarity. … this feeling of positive Jewish pride formed the matrix of the movement in the psychoanalytic circle: As a spur to renewed independence, it tightened the bond among the members and powered their self-image of a redemptive elite.”
The exception is Carl Jung, whom Freud named president of the International Psychoanalytical Association in 1910 precisely to deflect the reproach that psychoanalysis was a “Jewish science.” Interestingly, Jung is the only member who never subscribed to Freud’s theory of infantile sexuality. In response to a letter by Karl Abraham, who complained that “Jung seems to be reverting to his former spiritualistic inclinations,” Freud explained : “it is really easier for you than it is for Jung to follow my ideas, for … you stand nearer to my intellectual constitution because of racial kinship (Rassenverwandtschaft).” Freud asked Abraham not to antagonize Jung because “it was only by his appearance on the scene that psychoanalysis escaped the danger of becoming a Jewish national affair.”
In contrast to Jung, Abraham was the most zealot supporter of Freud’s theory of infantile sexuality. In The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement, 1919, Freud wrote that, “The last word in the question of traumatic etiology was later on said by Abraham, when he drew attention to the fact that just the peculiar nature of the child’s sexual constitution enables it to provoke sexual experiences of a peculiar kind, that is to say, traumas” (self-inflicted traumas, so to speak). Freud was referring to a 1907 paper by Abraham, “The Experiencing of Sexual Trauma as a Form of Sexual Activity.” It is perhaps significant that Abraham, son of an Orthodox rabbi, was also the most ethnocentric of Freud’s disciples. He wrote in 1913 an essay “On Neurotic Exogamy,” diagnosing Jewish men who say they “could never marry a Jewess” with a neurosis resulting from “disappointed incestuous love.”
In the 1890s, Freud’s clientele was drawn exclusively from the Jewish middle class. Imagine if Freud’s seduction theory had earned him the recognition he craved for: although he disguised the identity of his patients in his case studies, it would not have been long before his work was attacked, not just as “Jewish science,” but as evidence of the depravity of Jewish mores.
But then Hollywood/porn/brothels proved everybody wrong!
. Anything contradicting this superiority creates a cognitive dissonance which is overcome by denial.
superiority complex, like the guys who go on and on and on about how ‘stupid’ women are… but not so stupid as to be tricked into going out with them, interestingly…
Denial means projection: to protect the dirty secret of child abuse in Jewish families—including his own—, Freud projected an imaginary repressed infantile perversion on all mankind. Projection, in turn, means inversion: Freud’s close disciple Otto Rank claimed that Jews had a more primitive, and therefore more healthy sexuality than Gentiles (Rank, “The Essence of Judaism,” 1905). Freudians and Freudo-Marxists have systematically denounced Christian civilization as suffering from sexual repression.
Women who don’t want to be sluts and love their husband are “frigid”, a type of sexual insanity according to Jews.
It just so happens those therapists wanted to bone them.
According to Wilhelm Reich, anti-Semitism is itself a symptom of sexual frustration, and could be cured by sexual liberation (The Mass Psychology of Fascism, 1934)—an improvement from Leo Pinsker’s theory that Judeophobia was a “hereditary” and “incurable” “disease transmitted for two thousand years.”
“We’re all equal but you can’t question us”.
Pull the other one.
In order to understand the psychological background of this Reichian messianic mission to cure the Christian West, and in order to see more clearly the projective nature of the psychoanalytical theory of repression, it is helpful to know the personal story of Wilhelm Reich, which reads as a caricature of Freud’s: At ten years old, when he realized that his mother was having an affair with his tutor, the young Wilhelm thought of blackmailing his mother into having sex with him. Eventually, he confided in his father about his mother’s adultery. In 1910, after a period of beatings from his father, his mother committed suicide, for which Reich blamed himself.
Well… yeah. You can see why they hate Darwin to this day and all theories that extend from it, including Trivers parental investment (a purely K-theory).
Faithful fathers are biologically more successful, mathematically. It’s been proven.
The “spread your wild oats” bullshit is Jewish, similar to the ‘frigid’ rhetoric, as is the “quantity over quality” fallacy applied to men who deadbeat their children (note the Jews themselves do not do this?). It’s been debunked.
Child psychology has also shown since the outcomes of abandoned children to be poorer across the board (physically, mentally, financially) so anyone pushing that “men are supposed to be slutty” bullshit is either stupid or certainly thinks you are.
It’s literally bullshit peddled by Victorian Jews to seduce Christian wives.
And naturally, they cannot appeal to Darwin on the subject of sterile sex, it’s a false equivalence, they’re not having real sex (reproductive) and manwhores are functionally homosexual.
Nobody tells them this but it’s known. Well accepted.
They have the same disease risks, fertility issues, impotence performance, porn addiction and everything.
Well, the circumcision link goes into some of it.
“Adult circumcision appears to result in worsened erectile function”
They can’t even really get it up, perform and keep it up to satisfy women. They don’t even like adult, round breasts, small waists proportionately (not athletic or anorexic), with broad hips and pubic hair that make nubile women, nubile. Secondary sexual characteristics dictate sexuality, and with it fertility.
The r-select category is not hetero-specific, they’re on that half of the spectrum. It’s a series of acts and vices, including a preference for only sterile sex. Arguably, such men are functionally virgins. They’ve never engaged in the reproductive act with a fertile female human. Only chemical crones. Which they expect all women to be, or become repulsed by those women. Functionally homosexual.
The Jewish and Muslim obsession with anal is explained:
The remaining prepuce and any remaining portions of the frenulum can be preferentially stimulated by masturbation and oral sex, whereas the sensation of deep pressure dominates during hetero- sexual coitus. The imbalance from not having the input from the missing fine touch receptors may make the experience less satisfying, causing a man with an incomplete penis to supplement his sexual experiences with other forms of stimulation.
And who in society has the tightest arsehole?
Evil people have reasons.
Ancient societies only celebrated a figure like Zeus because all his coitus was fruitful. That’s what made it divine instead of a sin.
Notice nobody dared boff Hera?
And nobody just did oral (or ANY oral) with him, he practiced ‘anal’ on nobody. Those were considered immoral by the king of the pantheon of PAGAN gods, yet how many fake pagans push those things as pagan? How many creepy gay rapists in particular?
The things we’re desensitized to now, post-WW2, would’ve horrified actual pagans.
His responsibility was to reproduce, it had F-all to do with orgasm. The psychiatrists lie.
It wasn’t even about him and neither the ‘sex’ (so sometimes rape) but about being the Patriarch, the Father, the genetic legacy.
Hence the expression “the embrace of a God is always fruitful”.
’embrace’ meant carnal knowledge
and why Aphrodite was considered a virgin goddess, since she had zero children
how could the inspiration of the concept lust act upon herself?
she can’t embrace herself, and everyone else was fruitful
that was her sacrifice, having no children of her own but inspiring others in a time when few humans were around
within Jewish thinking, saving the nations and destroying them are not two sides of the same coin, but one and the same, because what nations are supposed to be cured of is their very identity (their gods, in biblical terms). According to Andrew Heinze, author of Jews and the American Soul, Jews have shaped “American ideas about the mind and soul” with the preoccupation “to purge the evils they associated with Christian civilization.” It really started with Freud. In September 1909, invited to give a series of lectures in New England, Freud jokingly asked his companions, Sandor Ferenczi and Carl Jung: “Don‘t they know we’re bringing them the plague?” An extraordinary statement for a medical doctor pretending to have found a “cure” for neurosis. And a prophetic one: Freudism became a justification for a sexual “liberation” that can be seen in retrospect as a massive sexual abuse of the youth.
Kinsey picked it up.
That man is possessed.
You cannot convince me otherwise.
By a stunning coincidence, Freud was initiated into the recently founded B’nai B’rith in September 1897, precisely the time of his conversion to the dogma of infantile sexuality.
..He recruited at least three members and in 1901 was a founding father of a second lodge in Vienna, the Harmony Lodge. The same year, he gave a talk on “Goals and Purposes of the B’nai B’rith Societies.” Freud often presented his work to the B’nai B’rith before publishing it. In this respect, writes Klein, the Viennese B’nai B’rith lodge “was a precursor of the movement of psychoanalysis.” “After his death in 1939, the B’nai B’rith of Vienna continued, relentlessly, the support granted during his lifetime to the famous ‘brother.’”
To what extent were the B’nai B’rith masonic meetings influential in Freud’s swing from the seduction theory to the Oedipus theory? No one can say. However, we can hold as fairly certain that Freud’s membership in the B’nai B’rith was influential in his becoming one of the major intellectual stars and gurus of modernity.
It could easily be argued that, in matters of psychology, every sensible thing that Freud said had been said before him, and that almost everything he said that hadn’t been said before has been proven wrong.
A Jewish plagiarist, why repeat yourself?
So why did Freud become so famous? The long answer is that Freud benefitted from the same kind of communication networking that produced many other Jewish intellectual “geniuses”, and made French novelist André Gide comment in 1914 (in his diary) about “this tendency to constantly emphasize the Jew, … this predisposition to recognizing in him talent, even genius” The shorter answer to the question above is: B’nai B’rith. I will not suggest that the B’nai B’rith supported Freud’s Oedipus theory because they saw its potential for the moral corruption of the West. Nor do I suggest that the B’nai B’rith and Freud conspired to ruin Western civilization with the pestilential idea of infantile sexuality. But I do suggest that, had Freud maintained his earlier conviction in the reality of the abuses suffered by his Jewish patients, he would not have received as much support.
Muh superior IQ, just don’t remove the verbal section we added and never ever control for class and education!
In 1913, the B’nai B’rith created the Anti-Defamation League to save the life and the reputation of Leo Frank, the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, who was convicted of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, a thirteen-year-old girl working in his pencil factory. The evidence for Frank’s guilt was overwhelming, but tremendous financial resources were deployed for his legal defense—including false testimonies—and an intense publicity was orchestrated in the news media, with the New York Times devoting enormous coverage to the case. I quote from Ron Unz’s article:
“For almost two years, the nearly limitless funds deployed by Frank’s supporters covered the costs of thirteen separate appeals on the state and federal levels, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, while the national media was used to endlessly vilify Georgia’s system of justice in the harshest possible terms. Naturally, this soon generated a local reaction, and during this period outraged Georgians began denouncing the wealthy Jews who were spending such enormous sums to subvert the local criminal justice system. … All appeals were ultimately rejected and Frank’s execution date for the rape and murder of the young girl finally drew near. But just days before he was scheduled to leave office, Georgia’s outgoing governor commuted Frank’s sentence, provoking an enormous storm of popular protest, especially since he was the legal partner of Frank’s chief defense lawyer, an obvious conflict of interest. … A few weeks later, a group of Georgia citizens stormed Frank’s prison farm, abducting and hanging him, with Frank becoming the first and only Jew lynched in American history.”
Lynch mobs don’t form for nothing.
If the courts are corrupt, mob justice prevails.
Thanks to the mobilization of the Jewish power elite—“as one man”—, Leo Frank has been turned from a convicted pedophile and child murderer into a martyr of anti-Semitism. We don’t know what Freud thought of the case, but there is an obvious resonance between his “assault on truth” and the B’nai B’rith’s. If young Mary Phagan had visited a Freudian psychoanalyst before her atrocious death, and complained of her boss’ sexual overtures, she probably would have been told about her own “penis envy”; had she protested, she would have been told that her protest proved her sexual repression—exactly as happened to Freud’s patient Dora, Ida Bauer by her real name, an eighteen-year-old girl suffering from hysterical symptoms.
“She really wanted it” – Jewish creeps from Freud to Weinstein.
“She secretly wanted it” – Jewish psychoanalysis and rapists everywhere.
I’ve never met a woman who’d part with her clitoris for any sum of money, but I’ve met plenty of men who expressed envy of them and their nerve density, who’d happily trade their penis. Especially if they know about the possibility of multiple orgasms… the mind boggles at such a castrating obsession.
There’s also the repulsive womb envy of men literally so effeminate they want to birth their own children as its sole parent in pods like a pozzed transsexual. They want to birth their own child outside the mother (spiting the child its birthright to a mother, evil) but are too chickenshit to go through the agony personally.
Why oh WHY can’t they find any woman who wants to breed with them? A mystery, truly.
But the fact that Freud’s Jewish disciples all discovered the same impulse, and that Freudism became so widely accepted by Jews, suggests that Freud’s generalization was not without merit. It only suffered from the tendency of Jewish intellectuals to project Jewish issues on all humankind. The child’s repressed wish to kill his father is not universally human, but may be characteristically Jewish. For the Jewish father is the guardian of Jewishness and the representative of the Jewish god. And every Jew aspires in the depth of his soul to free himself from Yahweh, the archetypal abusive and castrating Father.
And so the secret wish to murder the Jewish father is also a secret wish for the death of the Jewish god.
You had ten rules to follow.
Ten rules and you fucked it up.
It is therefore identical with the so-called “Jewish self-hatred” that Theodor Lessing saw as affecting every Jew without exception: “There is not a single man of Jewish blood in whom cannot be detected at least the beginning of Jewish self-hatred.”
the whiny self-pity and projection of blame to anyone who listens
By choosing a Greek myth as a metaphor for his theory, Freud was projecting on Gentiles a Jewish problem. Had he recognized the Jewish overtone of the complex,
he might have called it the “Isaac complex,” since Isaac is the son that Abraham was willing to slaughter.
The expression “Isaac complex” has actually been used by French heterodox psychoanalystJean-Pierre Fresco,
…Kafka describes the devastating effect on his personality of a father whose means of education were “abuse, threats, irony, spiteful laughter, and—oddly enough—self-pity.”
Maybe some BPD, a lot of Jewish men are borderline symptomatic. The identity issues, compulsive lying and adultery are characteristic.
…After the death of Gregor appears his sister Grete, his double in the other sex, the homosexualized son….
Also introduces kafkatrapping. If you accept or deny you are oppressed/repressed/abused, you were because of that! Gaslight.
The paternal prohibition of emancipation through marriage is linked to an incestuous domination that becomes clear when Georg submissively proposes to the father to exchange beds.
Marrying evil women is bad goyim, love your father who hates you…. forever….
They also claim sex is about power, so by putting white men off marriage and becoming Patriarchs, who gains in power? Who loses?
Rape isn’t about power either, sadists literally enjoy pain and humiliation.
You can’t fake humiliation.
….this uncomprehensible and omnipotent slanderer-accuser-judge is “the palimpsest of an archaic Abrahamic father unconsciously introjected as an archaic and sadistic superego, and turned into an inner persecutor.”
Whiny Jews make for shitty literature.
The victim mentality is absurd.
Who’d read that?
…..while his Jewish literary critics consider him quintessentially Jewish. “By common consent,” said Harold Bloom, “Kafka is not only the strongest modern Jewish writer, but the Jewish writer.”(Hence Israel’s decade-long legal battle to secure his autograph manuscripts as national treasure.) Who is right, of Kafka and his critics? Does his genius come from his being Jewish, or from his having a psychopathic father? Obviously, it is impossible to distinguish the two factors, because the psychopathic father happens to be Jewish; he is, in Fresco’s terms, the typical “Abrahamic father.” But are not all Jewish fathers Abrahamic in the measure of their Jewishness? Is not the Jewish god a psychopathic father—and the psychopathic father a Jewish god?
This might be why God punishes you, this bullshit.
Divine punishment happens because you broke the rules, you know them.
Thou shalt not adulterate, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not worship idols like money…
There’s a psychopathic inability to learn from ‘mistakes’, typical of the low IQ.
The key lock, poor analogy is pure psychopath. They see all humans as objects to be broken.
Their emotional circumcision is showing.
Had Freud preserved his original insight into the psychological damage of sexual abuse on children, he might have eventually reflected on the impact of neonatal circumcision. But he has been rather discreet on the subject—though he didn’t have his own sons circumcised.
He actually loved them?
In New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, he speculated that “during the human family’s primeval period, castration used to be carried out by a jealous and cruel father upon growing boys,” and that “circumcision, which so frequently plays a part in puberty rites among primitive people, is a clearly recognizable relic of it.” Freud went further in Moses and Monotheism:
“Circumcision is a symbolical substitute of castration,
not symbolic, surgical and the modern kind takes far more than ancient, which might’ve (probably) just been a small notch into the foreskin, removing nothing (and explaining survival rates)
a punishment which the primeval father dealt his sons long ago out of the awfulness of his power, and whosoever accepted this symbol showed by so doing that he was ready to submit to his father’s will, although it was at the cost of a painful sacrifice.”
and the trauma of a pain only recently studied
Interestingly, Freud originally got that idea from Sandor Ferenczi, who had written in an article that greatly impressed Freud, that circumcision is “a means of inspiring terror, a symbol of castration by the father.”
A psychopath’s envy of their same-sex child, envy of their youth.
and cult indicator of obedience, obvi
Given the Jewish undercurrent in Freud’s intellectual biography, it is reasonable to assume that his inability to deal with the issue of Jewish neonatal circumcision is connected to his refusal to face the devastating reality of child abuse. Isn’t the first abuse suffered by every Jewish male from the part of his parents and kins, circumcision on the eighth day? It physically impresses on every Jew, and on all Jews collectively, the traumatic domination of Yahweh and his Covenant.
implying removing body parts (male prepuce) was indicated in Genesis, which it was not
The psychological impact of neonatal circumcision, performed without anesthesia and causing unbearable pain, has been studied by Professor Ronald Goldman, author of Circumcision, the Hidden Trauma. His research shows a disturbance in the mother-child bonding process after the ritual.
Notice these women never want their own prepuce removed as adults? Nor their precious daughters.
No wonder Jews are such famed misogynists.
“I don’t feel I can recover from it. […] We had this beautiful baby boy and seven beautiful days and this beautiful rhythm starting, and it was like something had been shattered! … When he was first born there was a tie with my young one, my newborn. And when the circumcision happened, in order to allow it I had to cut off the bond. I had to cut off my natural instincts, and in doing so I cut off a lot of feelings towards Jesse. I cut it off to repress the pain and to repress the natural instinct to stop the circumcision.”
That isn’t holy, that’s Moloch. A woman-hating fake deity would want to break up the family bonding.
It’s like all the politicians suspiciously into ‘golf’ at courses with tunnels. Duh?
The unnatural incestuous wish that Freud and his Jewish male disciples discovered in their repressed unconscious could perhaps be explained as a result of the inhibition in mother-child bonding caused by the trauma of neonatal circumcision.
R-type blame shift.
A trauma caused at this age has little chance to ever be brought back into consciousness and be healed.
But infant pain is considered a great occult tool by Satanists, even to grant wishes (second is orgy rape). It’s also a portal for possession of the infant by sinful spirits.
Hey, I didn’t make their rules. I’m the messenger.
It’s like rapists going for easy prey in drunk women (alcohol is the most common rape drug) because the wolf will go for the hobbling sheep first.
More research is perhaps needed on the possible link between Jewish circumcision and the fact, according to the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, that “the Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell.”
Research done by sociologist Leo Srole in 1962 showed that the rate of neuroses and character disorders among Jews was about three times as high as among Catholics and Protestants.
In The Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud describes “religion”—meaning essentially Christianity—as a “universal obsessional neurosis” which has for believers the merit that “their acceptance of the universal neurosis spares them the task of constructing a personal one.”
If you hadn’t figured it out yet. Nihilism is Jewish.
Living isn’t something most people hate, Freud.
With a similar approach, Judaism can be described as a “collective sociopathy.” This does not mean that “the Jews” are sociopaths, but rather that, in proportion to the degree of their identification as Jews, they are victims of a sociopathic mindset patterned from the Tanakh, “marked in their flesh” (impressed traumatically in their subconscious) by circumcision, and fuel by their elites with the paranoia of anti-Semitism. The difference between collective sociopathy and individual sociopathy is the same as between collective neurosis and individual neurosis according to Freud: participation in a collective sociopathic mentality allows members of the community to channel sociopathic tendencies toward the outside of the community, and to maintain inside a high degree of sociability.
We’re their punching bag. That’s why they move to white areas.
White people are the Jewish scapegoat.
The moron has no bitchute mirror linked so…