Hiding in plain sight

You could wave that one at a lefty protest and nobody would even notice.

Also, 13 stars.

I’m sure the owl (psychopomp) was also a coincidence?

For all the “it’s just a shape, bro!”

think like a nerd

It’s actually Rephan or Moloch, not Saturn.

A planet isn’t eating kids. Don’t be silly. That’s a false flag detail, like the Morning-star / Venus.

Buddhism is just Satanism that’s kidding itself. Worship of the Self. Sitting around navel-gazing, what a wasted life. No moral standards or dignity whatsoever.

Selfish, obsessed with seeming piety (pride) and taking money.

If you incarnated here for a reason, it wasn’t to avoid a real job, karmically.

Meditation is just demonology channeling, look it up.

It’s Satanic prayer.

Their ‘spirit guides’ are demons, masquerading as angels or dead loved ones.

The Bible said to test them but the likes of Buddhists weirdly refuse? Why do they fear Jesus’ name then? That’d be a bizarre thing for Great Aunt Mabel to fear in the spirit world.

It’s a variation of prayer (Satanists subvert instead of create) that tries to contact spirits instead of God. Guess which type.

They also tend to have weird possession symptoms after taking up the habit, over time. Studies don’t mention that stuff. It opens you up to possession over time and they latch on, legion. Drugs make it worse, what do they get sudden impulses to do? Know them by their fruit.

I am shocked. And they all see this, they all know? Wow. Just wow.

Can confirm:

"The  owl  is also the symbol of  Moloch,  whom the Greeks 
   compared to  Cronos on accont of Moloch's rites using human
   sacrifice,  especially children and first-born infants.  The 
   Old  Testament makes reference to  the  Valley of Hinom  as 
   the area where  fires were lit beneath the idol or image of
   Moloch,  into which the unfortunate sacrifical victims were
   thrown.  The precise location of these sacrifices is  known
   as Topheth, which originates from the Hebrew toph,  meaning 
   'drum'--drums  were ostensibly used to cover up the screams
   of the victims."    (Toyne Newton,  "The Occult's Quest for
   World Domination", page 165)    This information is crucial
   and relevant if true, because the Molech-like ritual that's 
   performed at Bohemian Grove by the global elite uses a huge
   statue of an owl it its  ritual.   "Goodly Tyre",  which is 
   mentioned several times in the "Cremation of Care" rite was
   a center of  Goddess worship  at the time when king Soloman
   was building the great temple.]
Michael Howard, author of "The  Occult Conspiracy", asserts
   that the owl was also used by the  Summerians to  represent 
   the  great goddess, who was called Lilith, but was known to
   the Greeks later as  Hecate.

Maybe a lot of the Hollywood lot we think have no kids are just too traumatized from sacrificing them to have more.

Btw, why does FEMA have no child size coffins? What does it plan to do with the kids?

That’s a nice summary, aight imma head out:

This is interesting further reading, especially given Prince William’s famous Algol placement. He had to go and call his son Louis.


Masons don’t really allow women because women are appalled by the rape of little girls and murder of babies.

Algol aka Satan’s Head. Hillary has it prominent too. aka Demon Star.

As does Trump, oddly.

Algol Star – The Blinking Demon

[So do I. Also prominent Lilith. By all accounts, I should work for Planned Parenthood.]

Or castrate rapists?

After all, that is the cultural punishment here and doesn’t kill them.


Trivial measures won’t change a thing.

Especially while the media is taking tax revenue to oppose you.
And other forces opposed to your life increase national debt.

The leeches become ever more bloated, but I guess don’t look at them?

And circumcision has always been barbaric. The prepuce has an evolved function, in both sexes, where is Dawkins when you need him?

Especially barbaric in light of the 60s, impairing a future adult’s pleasure should be a sue-able offense. The religions admit this is the reason for it. The purpose is to reduce sexual function. If they did that with any other organ, they’d be arrested.

And sexual satisfaction studies are very clearly that both men and women prefer the body the way Nature intended.

Sexual activity can be good for the body, that doesn’t justify rape.

The inept American lover, blindly and angrily “banging” things, is globally mocked due to lack of sensitivity.
Yes, you are less of a man, literally. Anonymous women and gay men don’t lie about this.

Could it be a major cause of American divorce?

Could you track patriotism and circumcision rates? Stranger connections exist.

I’ve never had any complaints” say the worst lovers. Nobody bothers! They just don’t want you long-term. They throw him back into the single pond. These men have no idea how women actually work.

Women manage to keep everything clean.

Soap is cheaper than impotence, ED and paraphilias. Paraphilias in particular can be very costly, why, you can even break out in handcuffs.

There is no such thing as an “uncircumcised man” either, America, there is a normal, natural man.

The linguistic benchmark is the control group. We don’t reference tooth decay with unfillinged person!

Mutilated men are often (read, sarcasm: always) dry, too deep (cervix slammers) and “need” lubricant to account for their disability. The lack of natural slip actually increases infection rates on ALL counts, contrary to propaganda. Imagine fucking sandpaper.

Castration would also prevent the “spread of HIV” better than circumcision, if you want to be pedantic.

Arguments aren’t one-way streets. One disease is not any more or less important than the rest or overall health. First, HARM NONE.

What’s one percentage of flesh to another? Loki’s Wager.

The foreskin is a component of the structure called penis, so to remove the whole thing is no more evil.

If you allowed circumcision done on condition the adult child could sue their parents, that would be fine.

If any other adult harmed them, they could sue. Why are parents exempt?

Circumcision is correlated with plenty of mental issues later on and this was known way back in the Victorian era (Freud was sex-obsessed for a reason). The 20th century has taken a physical approach to what is psychologically scarring.

And totally ignored issues of consent, the right to physical integrity and sexual pleasure, not to mention a child’s freedom FROM religious imposition. The fact it matches their parents shouldn’t matter. It cannot be undone once they’re 18.

Christians don’t do it for a reason. It scars you for life. Literally.

What’s next, branding?

Ironically, (anecdotal, I know), Jewish men are so neurotic about their perceived impotence, they are almost always prolific adulterers, to feel better psychologically. The stoning punishment was also Biblical but eerily, they don’t want to enforce that… Naturally, they’d want to impose this limit on ALL men to 1. feel better personally and 2. make the prospect of another option impossible.

You see the same thing in ugly women trying to kill anything good, beautiful or pure in other women.

Judaism expressly warns the men not to allow their women anywhere near the intact. The stuff’s that good. Irresistible.

For those who objected to the title –

Is castration more barbaric than rape?

We already pay for castration on the NHS. I didn’t see any opposition with the procedure.

The worst rapists make their way to an area of easy pickings.

The European system essentially pays them to rape.

The purpose of welfare was a bribe to stop all crime.

Please, hold your sides.

They are in violation of their terms and hence, it should be stopped too.

What is the incentive?

There are two components – 1. welfare from a system none of their ancestors died for (you didn’t build that) and 2. no deterrent from the worst of crimes. This is better than the systems of their home countries (death). It’s a sound compromise. If they don’t like it, they are free to go somewhere else, we have a stringent culture of penal codes that made Vlad Tepes look like a kiddy with a bundle of twigs. We have a right to that strict culture (it’s our culture!) for defending those who harm the innocent. It’s the essence of liberalism.

Removing the eyelids would entail many of the same medical risks as these and we’re horrified by that.

Could another Holocaust start up from multiculturalism?

Takes the Hitler thing from historical perspective.


The Jewish people now face a greater threat not just in Europe but worldwide than they ever did under the Holocaust. This threat comes from the Left who, being far more populist and popular than the right, mask their opinions under moralism and then use that to — much as in the Civil War or WWII — justify destruction of those who disagree. The Left has turned the Palestinians into the new denizens of Auschwitz and will gladly do everything it can to deny the Jewish people in Israel any recourse. The UN, the media, academia and most NGOs have now turned on Israel and by extension, the Jewish people, who by wanting to exist as a people seem to exhibit the kind of nationalist sentiment that enrages liberals about Israel. This dovetails with a general process of assimilation by Jews in their host countries through outbreeding, secularization and most of all, a lack of belief in culture itself as leftism takes over and makes ideology, not culture and social order, the basis of society.

boom boom boom blackadder

You vote for collectivism and ingroup erasure, don’t act all shocked when you get it.

head desk blackadder give up

When people vote in favour of other people who want to kill them, I rest my head on the desk for a while. Leave me here. Everybody is stupid except us.

“Death to Arabs!” chant Jewish Defense League


h/t RoQ 

Other tidbits;



Hamas didn’t kill those three Israeli teens


What a fucking shocker.

Typical Leftist reaction.

Pictured: Typical Leftist reaction confronted with reality.

 When the bodies of three Israeli teenagers, kidnapped in the West Bank, were found late last month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not mince words. “Hamas is responsible, and Hamas will pay,” he said, initiating a campaign that eventually escalated into the present conflict in the region.

But now, officials admit the kidnappings were not Hamas’s handiwork after all.

He lied. He was caught out in a lie.
Modern Nuremberg trials, anyone?