Totally normal and biological. Evolution is amazing.
(Oxytocin also promotes patriotism, for those paying attention).
Totally normal and biological. Evolution is amazing.
(Oxytocin also promotes patriotism, for those paying attention).
Why the low IQ and useless disrespect the high IQ (and useful) as “lazy”.
They cannot imagine what they can’t see.
It’s called work for a reason.
There is genuine corruption but they don’t produce, but steal.
This isn’t the meme you want but it’s the meme you deserve.
Narcissists and atheists always lie (about the Bible).
So I screencapped, provided a link and enough context either side that the meaning is plain.
For more real Christian quotes (from the Bible) to trigger liars:
I wrote a post ages back on the old laws that protected marriage.
“Protection from adultery is the crucial means of safeguarding marriage for future generations.”
Protection from cheats is one.
Marriage is a contract. Yes, you should be held to your oath of monogamy.
Holding the seducer responsible doesn’t divide the house.
Also counts under criminal conversation. “Open marriage” cucking is effectively already illegal.
Way more expensive than a hooker.
If Vikings think providing is the manly thing to do, what’s a modern soyboy’s excuse?
They also had divorce and actually, a very very lawful society. Turns out you can’t conquer other peoples if you fight unfairly with your own kin.
Call it chivalry if you want but fathers who invest in their kin group have better fitness.
And women don’t cheat because they’re ovulating, idiots.
We don’t have a naturalistic fallacy excuse either!
You can’t have a patriarchy without fathers who take responsibility.
I don’t like it when SJWs lie about sexuality and pretend men could be the biggest sluts they wanted, forever, without consequence.
I don’t like it when men lie about their historic sexual habits either. There’s no excuse.
I was going to quote but screencaps deter liars. This was the common opinion and backed by the doctors of the time. They just can’t stand the idea their ancestors would be ashamed of them and think of them as just as slutty as the women they insult.
I guess their red pill got stuck?
Continence (sexual control) and sexual hygiene were the rule throughout history, we hear about exceptions because they were exceptions.
(And rich, usually rich and insane, it’s still fun to read about those).
Act like a savage, think like one. Pretty straightforward. Lust isn’t a virtue for men either. Giving in to any desire is a huge display of weakness.
The energy is meant to go to your development. Wasting it elsewhere stunts growth permanently. Degenerate is quite a physical phenomena. If you took identical twins, one would be taller, better-looking and healthier for abstaining compared to a profligate twin.
It does stunt the growth, they’re right. Neuroscience is finding (supernormal) stimulation is really, really bad for you, especially if you’re still developing – the development time is cut prematurely short because the energy gets burnt up. You have a finite supply. Puberty is meant to take many years. Telling men to masturbate, that it’s good for them, might be the first nail in the masculine coffin (same applies for women).
A retardation of your mature sex’s qualities. It’s horrendous.
The best-looking and sounding men I’ve ever seen simply had no desire to masturbate as teenagers (they were busy doing other things). They turned out really well, the so-called “late bloomer” just used to be… normal. By comparison, we all know plenty of people who peaked physically age fifteen then weirdly aged at speed.
Guess what they have in common.
It’s also no coincidence the best geniuses are virgins.
To this day, the life outcomes of those with impulse control are superior, including general health.
Suck on that.
If you want a biological mechanism for this, look into how caloric restriction works. Your body has finite life processing power. Don’t waste it.
Most self-help books for men came in the form of morality lessons.
Because they needed it.
No man is beyond reproach.
Gold mine, this interview.
We are losing the means of production to more ruthless countries in the Far East, and we are running out of natural resources. Unrest in far away countries have started cramping our wanderlust—quick now, 2017 might be your last chance to see the Louvre, the Pyramids and the beaches of Pattaya! And speaking of Pattaya, sexually transmitted diseases are quickly becoming immune to treatment, thus limiting us even in our choices of partners, and in their numbers, automatically unwinding the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s.
He gets it.
Mark Stein said “The future belongs to those who show up,” and as Evola noted, what we have to do now is to hold out, to “ride the tiger,” to “remain standing in the ruins,” to (as Rod Dreher posited) take the Benedict Option and become neo-monastics. And have children, of course. Lots and lots of children.
We need real intellectuals to replace the Cultural Marxists, once the ivory tower falls.
So there may be a good evolutionary reason for r-type behaviours.
They do tend to have more children the earlier they hit puberty, BUT this isn’t good for the individual girl.
This paper examines the relationship between age at menarche and fertility from two perspectives. Age at menarche is regarded as a crude indicator of the timing of fecundity that may affect the timing of conception among those sexually active; and age at menarche is regarded as a crude indicator of the timing of sexual maturation that may influence the timing of socio‐sexual behavior, namely dating and sexual intercourse. The data are drawn from a survey of New York City women who recently had their first child. The findings suggest that age at menarche as an indicator of fecundity is not a good predictor of the timing of the first birth, when controlling for age at first sexual intercourse. Looking only at initial noncontraceptors, however, we find the relationship is stronger. Age at menarche, viewed as an indicator of the timing of sexual maturation, does seem to have some influence on the timing of dating, but only for Blacks. For both races, age at first date is related to age at first sexual intercourse.
Let your kids ‘date’, don’t act shocked when there are STDs and teenage pregnancies. If they’re so ‘mature’ they can live alone before doing that stuff. Paying for their own stuff.
While overall age of menarche doesn’t impact fertility or menopause, it can affect cancer or heart disease risk profiles, too premature or late, respectively.
In the mid-19th Century, the average age of menarche in the U.S. was around 17 years old (though given that slavery wasn’t outlawed until 1865, that data was not likely entirely representative). By 2002, it had dropped to 12.6 years old, according to the CDC, and by 2010, to 12.5 years old.
Telling little girls to masturbate in Sex Ed class (yes, they do) to ‘explore their bodies’ (orgasm) is probably triggering puberty in that system and menarche earlier, since the body assumes you’re having sex, also giving them a higher breast cancer risk. Thanks, feminism. You’re giving people cancer.
Androgens are triggered and depending on individual sensitivity, this can trigger premature puberty.
Telling little kids to masturbate is grooming in my opinion, and should be illegal.
In fact, pedophiles tell kids to do that, the rest is just context.
The worst behaviours of the worst r-types make total sense when you realize they don’t have morals, they want to access the children of Ks and turn them into their own kind.
The people all about sociology are suddenly blaming genetics when it comes to menarche? Anybody else find that odd?
As it is, women shouldn’t be having children before 20, it isn’t physically or psychologically good for us.
It is recommended that even if early marriages are preferred and adopted as cultural norms, they be discouraged to bear child before the age of 20 years.
But that’s actually good for women (and bad for r-types running Sexual ‘Health’ classes) so don’t expect to hear it.
Recommendations include encouragement of girls’ education, which has manyadvantages including the prospects of a better marriage, improved child-rearing, correctedrole of women in the community, financial rewards and improved standard of living for thefamily as well as delay of child bearing.
These data quite clearly highlight the need for effective measures for increasing the waiting time for motherhood after attaining puberty among females and these effective strategies should be implemented in the context of their socio-economic, cultural and demographic backgrounds.
Yes, like water has a role in osmosis.
“And a new study has begun the task of identifying which genes are most likely involved in ASPD, with significant success.”
Please start on borderlines and histrionics and narcissists. We can clear Parliament. We can do it.
Suck on your socialization hypothesis.
“This seems to be the first time researchers have made this leap with a personality disorder.
But just as interesting are the concerns the researchers express about how their research might be misused. “
Here we go. The guilt-trip.
The findings stand by themselves, it is a choice how we use them.
…In the past, claims about specific genes and violence have been — in the researchers’ words — “misused” by prosecutors as evidence that defendants are violent. And as more studies like this one link specific genes to the potential for violence, that danger only grows.
It revokes neither legal agency (you chose to act on it) nor commits crime (the act) on its own grounds (that would be like arresting redheads). Being born isn’t a crime, they’re being misleading.
This is about racial profiling, among others. Prediction is the trigger word. They can’t say it shouldn’t be studied but they want to.
Some people have the brain structure of psychopaths – they are not psychopaths.
Some people have a blue-eye allele – they do not have blue eyes.
This is simply a filter for early on in the process that might save lives, like estimating their height from a footprint.
Also, the amused expression on this woman typifies the K-type reaction to violence.
She wants the party to start already. I don’t post about Ks enough but they rarely make the news.
As the populace go more K, the cuckservative Tories go r.
Point: Prisoners are getting iPads, hardworking white schoolgirls do not.
The politician’s response?
“It’s a fair point, there has to be equality in the system.”
Notice the demo, WWC?
(trans. White Working-Class)
The most under-served by multiculturalism and Left wing spending policies.
No coincidence, that.
This state of amygdala irritation is simply the beginning.
The accurate answer is Human Rights Legal Funding.
Without this, they’d be breaking rocks. Rightly so, in many cases.
The modern UK prison is better than a 4-star hotel.
She’s right, the people breaking the law are being rewarded. We’ve noticed this for a few years now but are recently speaking up. This isn’t a work of Orwell, the criminals are not the victims.
Those working hard are being actively punished, if you look at the funding. Follow the money.
By the time they’re in prison, it’s too late to be a good citizen.
You’re supposed to punish those people to fix them, that worked.
The final straw being the end of a rope, that worked.
Recidivism rates show soft rehab doesn’t work. HBD y’all.
Make them break rocks for a few years and maybe.
but there is a ‘discussion’ (gossip that might become a thing) that since the elite struck capital punishment off the books without a vote or really public approval, it might come down to the referendum in the coming years.
There are even polls checking sentiment.
How do you think these girls would vote?
Same goes for disarmament.
These speculations are from the same source as I heard about the Brexit referendum in about …2010. Shall we say these votes might occur in 2022-24?