Italians are reeling from the revelation that a crime ring, which includes a mayor, doctors and social workers, had been brainwashing children to say their parents abused them, so as to easily sell them on to foster families.
It’s still trafficking, whether or not Jolie’s doing it. Actually, especially then.
Selling a human is slavery.
Better life was the excuse for all slavery ever – no.
and genocide, see e)
So far eighteen people, including the mayor of the town of Bibbiano, near Reggio Emilia in northern Italy, have been arrested.
They were suspected of working together to brainwash the kids, who were taken from disadvantaged families under false pretexts, into believing they’d been abused at home. This was later used as a justification to seize the children and, basically, to sell them to foster parents at a high price.
Stealing from the poor and working class, likely for Satanic orgy rape or something on par with the ‘King’s’ purple baths. Why weren’t the McCanns thrown in prison? Why keep the other kids? They were middle class, hence protected.
The psychologists at the Hansel and Gretel Association in the town of Moncalieri, near Turin, have used a variety of bizarre techniques to achieve their sinister goal.
They relied on persuasion to make their victims believe that their parents hurt and sexually abused them; showed fake, childlike drawings with added sexual details and even enacted plays, dressing up in scary masks to represent their moms and dads as being vile and dangerous…. The people to whom the boys and girls were handed over reportedly included sex shop owners, persons with psychological disorders and parents whose children had committed suicide. It was under this ‘foster care’ that at least two of the victims suffered actual sexual abuse, according to reports.
The criminal organization was busted by police as part of an operation codenamed “Angels and Demons,” which was launched in late summer 2018 after an unnaturally high number of child sex abuse reports were spotted as coming from an area in the Reggio Emilia province. Those arrested, as well as 27 others under investigation, have been charged with mistreatment of minors, violence, abuse of office, fraud and falsifying public records.
Our own Parliament admitted social workers have lied on record, same people who tell sex slave rape victims they were ‘asking for it’ and leave them to sleep outside in the cold on park benches, telling others they were hookers.
When you think about it we live in the most unfree, tyrannical society ever.
Holding a public opinion gets you arrested and thrown into a dangerous, deprived place full of armed disease-ridden savages who want to psychologically torture and kill you for breathing because something something Crusades.
Show me any time period in history that tops that for the average citizen.
Only the genocidal witch trials maybe. MAYBE.
We will be the future’s dystopian historical setting.
If the State enforcers don’t like the parents, they can steal (and sell) children.
That is slavery, literally. Thanks, Blair! (not accidental)
The Lefty McCann parents still have their kids. So who’s getting robbed in the most evil (genocidal) way and their children literally abused in a system that doesn’t care, they have worse life outcomes across the board (there are many many cases if you look)?
Above: we make it worse in every way, let us magically make it better with even more money.
Abuse cases involve physical, sexual and psychological abuse, plus the fundamental isolation (human right to family life) of being kidnapped on top of prison structures (Orwellian “care homes”) inflicted on innocent people (the places have guards, it’s a prison) – so taking them out of those alleged* situations isn’t the real motive, is it? There are druggings (poisonings) and tasers involved if the child resists their effective imprisonment.
But making “bad people” aka bad parents not have kids in the first place is “evil”?
No, only if you wanted to sell them.
Sorry, “financial incentives”.
We live in a world of fat teachers reporting children for obesity. I didn’t realise they were doctors.
Why not arrest the teachers? If the children weigh in (humiliation is illegal but they do) then why not the teachers in front of the kids?
*Implying public servants never lie to justify their job, you kidding? Why are family courts not public as common law dictates yet socially valid? That makes them technically illegal and they will be outed eventually.
Why doesn’t a child have a say in who they’re sold to? (Forced adoption is the PC term for legal human chattel, fridge horror is knowing taxpayers fund their own children being sold from them).
Why conduct social engineering experiments on helpless children they know to cause bad outcomes e.g. two “dads”, single foster parent, mixed religions that mutilate the genitals of children?
Adoption studies show it doesn’t work, they still end up like their birth parents, so “improvement” isn’t a valid excuse anymore (Jayman covered parenthood and adoption facts that go against “common sense”).
Care homes are just children’s prisons worse than 99% of the situations (they appeal to exception) they seek to “rescue” the child from and get this, many are actually privately owned.What’s the first thing a pedophile would buy into?
Their testimony, btw, is not believed, especially if they put drugs in the kid’s food.
A prisoner in for child rape has more rights and public respect for their feelings than a child in a “care home”.
So they’re taken out of a home that’s probably fine but poor (money into the home would help instead of giving it to busybodies who want to control freak a child’s life because they’re childless**) and instead abused in a system of all types then cycle of abuse means they’re likelier to “need” that system in future like a hole in the head.
Where is the logic here?
Dependence, never trust a socialist. You’re better to them weak or dead.
The state grows as the people wither.
** Measure a social worker’s saliva serotonin when they get their (sexual) high off being a control freak and order the kidnapping of children. It would be comparable to SS camp guards in Nazi Poland. Do that study, Peterson, become a legend in psychiatry. I won’t take credit, I swear. It would come under pathological altruism despite being sadistic, deliberately abusive but masquerading as altruistic for a dual boost (covert narcissism).
The McCanns neglected their children obviously, but who’s to say what is neglect and abuse? The SS as they’re aptly known tried to take children off people for political party membership (never a left wing one, it was libertarian UKIP), for being Christian and for teaching them “bad” habits like making gun noises at school during lunch or being unPC, telling the black kid at school they aren’t English and never will be, they’re African (biological fact). That last child was put on a list. Literally.
The SS are the enemy. Any excuse to intrude in your life and threaten to genocide (c, e and usually b) a bloodline they hate, think SJWs with power over innocents. For b, there are plenty of studies that keeping a child from their relatives exerts profound psychological damage, it’s essentially a form of torture.
It’s political war on your very bloodline, that’s worse than murder!
At least the child would survive you! And be raised by family, where the only good scientific outcomes happen!
They called the Rotherham rape victims prostitutes. They still do.
That is not even feminist. That’s gaslighting for terrorists (sexual terrorism), a form of treason.
Abuse of public office? Neglect (irony) of duty of care? Privileging adults over children they are sworn to defend? (They swear oaths in kangaroo court but an oath to do their damn job hasn’t been brought in because….?)
These people brought in Sharia courts in the West. A parallel legal system, also illegal and invalid.
They are the biggest child abusers in the world, by number and horror.
Look up the woman from Italy (white foreigners aren’t safe!) forced to have a C-section (which could’ve killed her!) so they could steal her pre-term (now at-risk) baby before she left the country legally to go home!
This happens every day, ruled in secret courts.
You don’t hear about it because years after the case, the poor parents can’t legally talk about it!
Is that justice? Ah, no reporters that way. Clear motive why it’s “contempt of (illicit) court”.
MRAs need to make family courts public before any otherlegal changes can happen, idiots.
Oh, and they target poor couples who can’t afford to legally defend themselves from the slander of monstering. Vox Day won’t dare mention this mess. A study of children taken by class membership would definitively prove the social injustice and its precise genocide.
No court should be secret in a free society.
It doesn’t protect the children, it protects the slave owners.
Why can’t the child sue the person who bought them?
If you don’t quietly let the State hand them over to pedophiles and abusers in the “care system”, for big slavery bucks, you go to a big building full of them. But that’s old news, now they’re coming after all the other parents.
She made the children over the course of nine months, they belong to her. It was an investment of her literal body and some women die doing it. She did her job, including feed them – again, with her body. She gave them life and kept them alive.
If the former husband is unfit for the job, the successor takes over. That’s what divorce means. He’s still trying to have husband’s rights (over where she lives, the caregiver) without the responsibility. That won’t last.
Narcissistic divorcees refuse to let their former relatives be happy.
(That would include where the female happens to be one).
This isn’t a victory for “men”, or deadbeat* “husbands”, either. The State is over-ruling everyone, pay attention. No freedom of movement, like a slaughterhouse. It also rides roughshod over the new husband, whose rights are being denied.
The National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW), for example, argued that transracial adoption was, in essence, a form of race and cultural genocide (i.e., children will not develop proper skills to survive in a racist society), and the NABSW passed a resolution in 1972 calling for an end to the transracial adoption of African American children. Native American opposition to the Indian Adoption Project on similar grounds led to its eventual dissolution with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978 (Simon & Altstein, 2000). Social service agencies and organizations, including the CWLA, responded quickly by revising their standards for adoption to a preference for same-race families. The policy change led to a sharp decrease in the number of Black-White adoptions from 2,574 in 1971 to an estimated 1,400 in 1987 (Bachrach, Adams, Sambrano, & London, 1990; Simon & Altstein, 2000). There are no reliable past or present estimates for the number of domestic transracial adoptions that are not Black-White.
You may have heard a while back about the Italian woman knocked out, given a C-section and having had her child kidnapped.
Italians were rightly outraged. This is part of a process called a forced adoption.
It seems this is a much bigger problem than I’d thought. The people who allowed Rotherham among many other unreported cases to happen, and since MW is covering Rotherham abuses of power extensively, I decided to look into their operations. It is chilling and disturbing viewing.
Secret courts. That’s how this happens.
Watch the whole thing, listen to the teenage boy assert his human rights and be pinned down painfully by adult men, handcuffed despite committing no crime and screaming. Tell me there’s nothing wrong with the system.
The targets exist, brought in under Blair, yet I have seen them deny this elsewhere despite evidence. Who sets them and why doesn’t matter, fact is they get paid to traffic children and this acts as incentive for corruption.
Notice the way the social worker (they’re all SJWs and simply get pushed to another council when caught out) smiles when she says about the extreme of taking children for no good reason.
Here, in the first minute of secret filming, they admit to leaving children homeless out in the cold to sleep on a park bench.
A judge himself admits people could be forgiven for thinking the family courts (secret courts) are “neither compassionate nor humane”.
“Maggie Mellon who is the Deputy Chair of the British Association of Social Workers said:
“The policy imperative towards more and quicker forced adoption means we may well look back at this period in horror as we do now to the forcible removal of thousands of children to Australia in the 1930s, forties and fifties without their parents’ knowledge and consent. That was done because it was felt it was the right thing but now we think how on earth could we possibly have done that?””
Already covering themselves as the victims under We Didn’t Know! As they write the reports to make it happen.
Note: The entryism and punishment for critical thought for the honest people who try to take up the career. They are routinely denied promotion or fired for refusing to acquiescence to their superior’s demands, regardless of the child’s best interests. “Risk of harm” is as reliable as a horoscope, guesswork wide open to deception, there is a risk of harm to anyone walking in a public street, day or night. Must we adults be locked up for our own safety? The Court of Protection even confines the elderly, by calling them a danger to themselves (strangely, they get control of the elder’s finances, which I’m sure presents no motive). http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/05/27/social-worker-suspended-register-undermining-child-protection-order-application/
No less evidence presented than to Parliament itself, those in charge are fully aware of this and do nothing.
“I have several judgements showing the building of fake evidence at a ridiculous level without even any care for making this fake evidence looking true. It is brutal to say this but social workers perjury, administration cover-up and mock trials are dominating family courts. No wonder why they don’t want the press to see this. In COA I have seen a judge who is now in the House of Lords justifying to a father the removal of his son that way : You show that you could probably be a good father but you will raise your son in the dislike of the professionals (social workers) involved in your life.”
How can the failure to act be explained?
Well, there are plenty of allegations of elite pedophile rings in the UK and this would make powerful people easy to blackmail and control.