Alienation of affections

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/28/jilted-husband-awarded-8-8m-after-suing-wifes-lover.html

I wrote a post ages back on the old laws that protected marriage.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/which-laws-kept-marriages-intact/
“Protection from adultery is the crucial means of safeguarding marriage for future generations.”

Protection from cheats is one.

Marriage is a contract. Yes, you should be held to your oath of monogamy.

Holding the seducer responsible doesn’t divide the house.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/30/std-free-blood-tests-before-marriage-kept-it-good/

Also counts under criminal conversation. “Open marriage” cucking is effectively already illegal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conversation

Way more expensive than a hooker.

Viking welfare system including child support

http://www.academia.edu/161539/A_Medieval_Welfare_State_Welfare_Provision_in_a_Twelfth-Century_Icelandic_Law_Code

If Vikings think providing is the manly thing to do, what’s a modern soyboy’s excuse?
They also had divorce and actually, a very very lawful society. Turns out you can’t conquer other peoples if you fight unfairly with your own kin.

Call it chivalry if you want but fathers who invest in their kin group have better fitness.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/rk-and-trivers-parental-investment-theory/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/07/04/r-types-polyandric-and-k-types-monoandric/

And women don’t cheat because they’re ovulating, idiots.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/02/09/female-fertility-doesnt-encourage-cheating/

We don’t have a naturalistic fallacy excuse either!

You can’t have a patriarchy without fathers who take responsibility.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/02/14/interpersonal-deprivation-from-single-fathers/

Extra credit:

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/link-feminism-as-the-death-of-self-respect/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/women-notice-how-you-treat-the-rest-of-us/

The legal serfs

https://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com/content/legal-fiction-how-they-control-us

“The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.”

“We, the British people have right to govern ourselves, we have a natural instinct to want to preserve our sovereignty and our independence… but we have been lulled into thinking that we need the permission of a powerful elite to secure it… we do not.”

When did British morality die?

The recent interest in the Eisenstadt v. Baird case

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/405/438/case.html

might make it look like I’m picking on the Yanks. OK, I was, but I can also pinpoint a moment we were morally doomed too.

1977.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/45

Subsection (1) above shall not affect the offence of conspiracy at common law if and in so far as it may be committed by entering into an agreement to engage in conduct which—

(a)tends to corrupt public morals or outrages public decency; but

(b)would not amount to or involve the commission of an offence if carried out by a single person otherwise than in pursuance of an agreement.

Anything “consensual” goes, quite a powerful label.

We could technically make online porn illegal over night, since it’s cinematographic and children frequently view it, which is not only grooming but corrupting.

(3)In section 2 of that Act after subsection (4) there shall be inserted the following subsection:—

(4A)Without prejudice to subsection (4) above, a person shall not be proceeded against for an offence at common law—

(a)in respect of a cinematograph exhibition or anything said or done in the course of a cinematograph exhibition, where it is of the essence of the common law offence that the exhibition or, as the case may be, what was said or done was obscene, indecent, offensive, disgusting or injurious to morality; or

(b)in respect of an agreement to give a cinematograph exhibition or to cause anything to be said or done in the course of such an exhibition where the common law offence consists of conspiring to corrupt public morals or to do any act contrary to public morals or decency.

(4)At the end of section 2 of that Act there shall be added the following subsection:—

(7)In this section ” cinematograph exhibition ” means an exhibition of moving pictures produced on a screen by means which include the projection of light.

(5)In section 3 of that Act (which among other things makes provision for the forfeiture of obscene articles kept for publication for gain) at the beginning of subsection (3) there shall be inserted the words

Subject to subsection (3A) of this sectionand at the end of that subsection there shall be inserted the following subsection:—

(3A)Without prejudice to the duty of a court to make an order for the forfeiture of an article where section 1(4) of the Obscene Publications Act 1964 applies (orders made on conviction), in a case where by virtue of subsection (3A) of section 2 of this Act proceedings under the said section 2 for having an article for publication for gain could not be instituted except by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions, no order for the forfeiture of the article shall be made under this section unless the warrant under which the article was seized was issued on an information laid by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Wonder why nobody wants to see plays anymore?

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/54

Abolition of censorship of the theatre

1Abolition of censorship of the theatre.

(1)The M1Theatres Act 1843 is hereby repealed; and none of the powers which were exercisable thereunder by the Lord Chamberlain of Her Majesty’s Household shall be exercisable by or on behalf of Her Majesty by virtue of Her royal prerogative.

(2)[F1In granting, renewing or transferring any licence under this Act for the use of any premises for the public performance of plays or in varying any of the terms, conditions or restrictions on or subject to which any such licence is held, the licensing authority shall not have power to impose any term, condition or restriction as to the nature of the plays which may be performed under the licence or as to the manner of performing plays thereunder:

Provided that nothing in this subsection shall prevent a licensing authority from imposing any term, condition or restriction which they consider necessary in the interests of physical safety or health or any condition regulating or prohibiting the giving of an exhibition, demonstration or performance of hypnotism within the meaning of the M2Hypnotism Act 1952.]

Health and Safety overtook the concern for public morality.
That’s why actors can get naked and perform sexual acts in a play.

There’s our own Race Relations statute (we never used to need one….) and hate speech was only written in once the original protection of the natives, White Christians, was written out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Immigration_Act_2008#Blasphemy

That is the year we officially became second class citizens in our own country.
It just so happens to be around the time left-wing batshittery became intolerable.

No such thing as common law marriage

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42134722

NEWSFLASH: You want the benefits of marriage, you have to actually get married.

There is only living in sin.

Stupid is as stupid does.
You don’t have tenancy rights without signing a tenancy agreement.
Neither do you have employee rights without signing an employment contract.

You lost everything, years of your life, because not once did you think to fucking Google it? I searched this years ago and the Government did their job, it’s the top of the first page. You don’t just get to assume you have rights by the power of wishful thinking. Nah, I don’t buy it, you deserve to be miserable. You know who doesn’t? Any children, tiny tot ATMs.

That’s the real secret. Married couples have less rights to benefits than “cohabiting”.

The kids are still gonna be screwed up, the same as single parents.
Children need the security of marriage.

Room mates don’t have rights. It’s like claiming the town bike is cheating. Nope! They owe you nothing! A girlfriend or boyfriend owes no fidelity.

Marriage is literally a vow of monogamy. No legal right to the latter without the former.
Engagement is the fringe case with a verbal contract. Cohabiting means jack shit.

How many people even know engagements have a time limit? After a couple of years, specifics vary, the proposing partner can claim you never intended to get married, because you delayed and the verbal contract was rescinded. ASK A LAWYER.

Why do women take up more government resources?
Which sex is left holding the baby? Blame deadbeats, they ain’t paying for their little splunk junket. We are. Everyone else.

Bringing in bullshit laws would make modern marriage even more useless.
People need incentives. And price controls for wedding basics would help.
I was planning a wedding recently and OMFG. They’re just flowers. Stick bridal before something and the price goes up 50x.

For the scaredy boys?
Single male friends don’t want you to get married for the same reason single female women don’t want their friends to get married to quality either: less attention, less time. They are replaced as a primary social obligation in your life.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/the-5-reasons-marriage-scares-men-arent-what-you-think/
Married men are happier than bachelors, some are frenemies trying to put you off the Best Woman For You, like you’ll get a second chance. If she’s the best option, the prospect of fucking her repeatedly isn’t a trial.
Re-marrying? Having seen the stats? OK, don’t bother. If you couldn’t make it once, you can’t do it again.

It’s easier to write a sitcom doofus fucking up if there’s no wife to help him.

Society is homogeneous

Source: Fascist goy for tolerance and understanding: reloaded

Related modern scientific terms:

Kinship, ingroup preference, genophilia.

Multiculturalism is divide and rule. Begin with colonialism and once the wedge is driven, crack it open.

Inb4 women shouldn’t inherit, “feminism did this” – you give them too much credit.

Where women are excluded from inheritance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salic_law#Some_tenets_of_the_law

bachelors aren’t human.

Consider carefully.

Individual rights apply to men and women, or nobody.
That’s literally how they work.

nb Those saying Down with Western Civ?

Can’t grow their own food.