Link: Liberals, reject your privileged scum or lose

TLDR for ya.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/liberals-can-win-if-they-stop-being-so-annoying-2017-7
h/t https://www.datalounge.com/thread/19290429-liberals-can-win-again-if-they-stop-being-so-annoying-

comment 2
“Liberals can win again when they stop their muslim and tranny ass kissing.”

SOLUTIONS. YIPEE.

5
“I honestly believe we are overly PC and somewhat precious, but more importantly we need to have a simple message.”
It’s the SJWs, they’re popularity poison.

6 might be me, in astral form
“You can choose to face the problems of the world and try to do something about them, or you can stick your head up your ass and pretend everything is hunky dory.
Progressives prefer the former. Deplorables, being the lazy shits that they are, would prefer to chow down on burgers and watch football, as the article states.”

Controversy means nothing nowadays, it’s whiny people getting their knickers twisted about something that will never be any of their business. Goes for the signalling right too. We used to call those people busybody nosy Mrs Grundies. They still are.

“Do you guys understand that people are tired of feeling like an extra on the “The Crucible” and the Puritan morality is becoming slightly boring and frustrating?. It is guilt and condescending guilt at that.
The working Class should be the base of the Democrats. The fact that so many think they are above them makes me feel I am writing an essay on the Anciene she Regime in France pre 1789, rather than a Democratic Party.
You look down on Deplorables. Tell me your plan to win 2020. Let’s be honest here. Tell me me your plan to win 2028. Cause if we continue down this way, that’s the next time we have a real chance.”

Yes, it’s 100% class. Look at the voting metrics by demo.
Democracy coming from demos, for demographic.
I stopped quoting at comment 14 but it’s a superb thread and proof of why I read these things.
They’re actually not all dumb.

The Labour party could learn a thing too.

Link: The liberal case against identity politics

You wanted it, you got it, toots.

https://www.vox.com/2017/8/15/16089286/identity-politics-liberalism-republicans-democrats-trump-clinton

They’re right in that it’s good for the right and bad for the left, since the left is all about diversity and identity unifies and homogenizes. Nature is conservative and red in tooth and claw.

They cannot think their own policies through to its logical consequences and the unintended ones are farcical.

We’re the same!

Wait, no! We’re different!

We’re somewhat the same but totally equal!

Then there’s all the inequalities!

Hail Science! Unless it’s fake!

Praise the Faith of Liberal Creationism!

It’s totally 100% completely genetic!

Unless there’s engineering tech in the works!

We need immigrants!

We hate robots!

We’re futurists!

We love tests! 

Academia is racist!

The Lord made our enemies ridiculous.

Chinese insult ‘white left’ with baizuo

https://www.opendemocracy.net/digitaliberties/chenchen-zhang/curious-rise-of-white-left-as-chinese-internet-insult

Although the emphasis varies, baizuo is used generally to describe those who “only care about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment” and “have no sense of real problems in the real world”; they are hypocritical humanitarians who advocate for peace and equality only to “satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority”; they are “obsessed with political correctness” to the extent that they “tolerate backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism”; they believe in the welfare state that “benefits only the idle and the free riders”; they are the “ignorant and arrogant westerners” who “pity the rest of the world and think they are saviours”

It fits!

h/t AC

http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/china-makes-fun-of-the-white-left/

The Left’s final authoritarianism: Kill them!

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2017/06/leftist-violence-donald-trump-ann-coulter/

The Left always end up authoritarian, tyrannical with dictators eventually. They deny reality, hide, cloak and conceal the facts as their fairytales crumble and that requires breaking the honest.

Eventually they always end up simply starving or imprisoning or shooting dissenters. It’s a rule of history and a fact of their operations. At least the mask of sanity has slipped, I helped set off the ‘so much for the tolerant Left’ meme. I can admit it since it’s penetrated the noosphere fully.

Whether the police come in the day or night changes nothing.

What we’re seeing is the following: Prominent liberals repeatedly tell us, with deadly seriousness, that Trump and his supporters are: “Hitler,” “fascists,” “bigots,” “haters,” “racists,” “terrorists,” “criminals” and “white supremacists,” which is then followed by liberals physically attacking conservatives.

Priming the imports for the civil war.

What, you think people scared to throw a punch would do it themselves?

To talk about “both sides” being guilty of provocative rhetoric is like talking about “both genders” being guilty of rape.

Poor analogy from otherwise sensible woman.

 If Trump is Hitler and his supporters Nazis, then the rational course of action for any civilized person is to kill them.

/s

That’s not just a theory, it’s the result.

Where’s the hate speech prosecutions? What about all those incitement laws?

Last month, the anti-jihad scholar Robert Spencer was poisoned in Iceland by a Social Justice Warrior pretending to be a fan, sending Spencer to the hospital.

See from above? Men can be victims but it’s uncommon.

It is silly to act like women can be effective predators though, especially from those harping on about biology.

Liberals know damn well that their audience includes a not-insignificant portion of foaming-at-the-mouth lunatics, prepared, at the slightest provocation, to smash windows, burn down neighborhoods, physically attack and even murder conservatives. But instead of toning down the rhetoric, the respectable left keeps throwing matches on the bone-dry tinder, and then indignantly asks, “Are you saying conservatives don’t do it, too?”

No, actually. We don’t.

They’re actually paying for the people attacking them.
Why?

The promise of social contract – work hard, retire.
That second part won’t happen. There’s no social contract once you’ve lost the homogeneous society (that agrees on things like the social contract).
See The Lion for further details on how that will go.

The Left have been saying the white deserve genocide for daring to be more historically successful, then for not paying enough money, then for various wars whites didn’t want to start and finally for not rolling over fast enough.

It’s all a con.

The politics of envy will always end up with murder, it’s Darwinian. They want to kill the competition, we call those K-selected but whatever way you slice it, they can’t be top of the pile with superiors sitting there. All they can do is swarm, mob rule by identity politics.

I envy the blacks in a way, because they have the N-word. Where’s our equivalent of the n-word to describe the traitors to our interests in our midst? This is the use I describe.

You must name the beast, label the enemy to address it. We’re not allowed, SJW is close, Cultural Marxist closer. But what about ethnic Europeans who hate Europe and other ethnic Europeans being happy?

Hollywood communists and lessons to learn

Virtue signalling is for idiots.

People who want to abolish ‘wealth’ approach the rich… and they didn’t ping to any danger?

http://clickamericana.com/media/movies-motion-pictures/exposing-hollywoods-red-menace-1940

“Here’s how it was worked.
Wherever possible, Communists got converts and sympathizers in the film colony to sign pledges. They saw to it that the pledges were kept. Out of the salaries of the unlucky ones, came a certain, set, agreed-upon percentage for the party. Not all the agreements were so bald that the dupe knew his money was going directly into Communist channels. Sometimes the deductions were earmarked for this of that “anti” league, or some patriotic sounding unit with a professed fight against Fascism or Nazism. Whatever the name, the deductions went almost invariably to aid the Communist cause or into the pockets of the solicitors.”

Like those petitions, Government ‘calls’ and pledges.

Black man Holocaust mashup

I wonder if the black one knows about black genocide and the wealth inequality of the Jews that continue to this day. He probably does but I’d have mentioned it.

I don’t know what to say about this otherwise. It’s also difficult to hear anything.
“You was oppressin’ the German, you was oppressin’ him!”
I think the guy in glasses got a very hard reality check there about the unity of diversity.
You know he’d want the black man arrested if he could. That way he’d win the argument, in his mind.

“I’ve seen it! I’ve seen it!” I doubt he saw that Holocaust documentary by the Jewish guy who interviewed the Auschwitz people that admitted, on camera, the ‘chambers’ were built after the war.

You could point to a common kitchen knife and claim Jack the Ripper used it, doesn’t make it so. Burden of Proof.

This type of thing is often what happens when factions of identikit Leftism meet.
One party shouts, the other cries, then they swap. Like a hissy fit from adults.

They’re trying to outsignal and rentseek so I think the black guy wins.

Who is the victim here?

Check today’s Prog-Stack.