How many lefties are domestic abusers?

The end of that interview slays me. Knowing he knocked her about. Well, race-mixers usually do knock them about, there are studies.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/11/27/mixed-race-divorce-and-domestic-abuse/

He’s right in one sense – pop culture tries to control white women but that’s the Jewish man, white men are hands-off about guidance unless it’s their child.

“makes them paint their face and dance” is a refrain – that’s Hollywood

that a woman who doesn’t make herself an available whore is lesser, but that’s Jewish propaganda

white men simply accepted it

it’s a 20th century invention

Gender dynamics got worse in that century up to now – silly women burning food in adverts, silly women only good for raising bratty kids, no higher concerns or humanity. Conservative women used to be praised and considered virtuous. How many white men praise our virtues now? They verbally abuse the very women they biologically need (faint praise, disclaimers of open, blanket distrust aka misogyny etc) then they’re confused how those insulted women don’t want them anymore. Shocker. White men have been turned from their own women. The Left won. They 100% won in this regard and it’s getting worse.

There is programmed disgust toward the very women they consciously claim to want.

A lot of women are basically giving up, not even FGTOW just focusing on career to put food on the table because men don’t know what they really want, don’t want to be provider anymore but expect all the power of their gender role, can’t be trusted to act in accordance with their stated beliefs (character) and give trad women nothing to hope for. All they bring is a dick to a marriage, wow, your ancestors would be proud, you exist. You exist! It isn’t like husbands need training or anything. We’ve all seen it, where the husband wastes his energy on impressing tarts. If they’re nicer to some slapper waitress than their wife at dinner, what’s the point?

Then they wonder why the women want out. The vow said cherish.

It is not an option, women need it. That song hits a nerve because men mock their wife, the exact opposite. They bully her for wearing a dress or not, wearing make-up or not, caring about trends or not. You cannot win. It’s toxic.

Women see this sexual humiliation (and it is) and think, well, he doesn’t love her. So she leaves, eventually. Love is a verb.

Public humiliation of wives is now considered normal. Good husbands are insulted for being happy, in ghetto it’s ‘whipped’. The ghetto is a crab bucket culture.

It’s getting worse online too. Men are unconsciously repelling valid breeding partners, maybe consciously telling themselves the Jewish lie – treat them mean, to keep them keen. White men have killed themselves with their open contempt for their women. It’s about as racist as you can get, hating the people who’d bear your race’s future.

There’s no excuse for it and no civil disagreement allowed either. No talking around or reasoning.

Notice SJWs hate white women in practice more than men? But so called right-wing men are acting just like them.

Nowadays, a woman disagreeing with a man politically is dehumanised by him and also called, effectively, retarded. Gee, why aren’t right women open about it? Why don’t women care about politics around men? The broflakes insult us with ad hominem for disagreeing with them! Our own men hate us and are encouraged to see us as subhuman by white larpers online (and Jewish porn propaganda) if we’re not lefty harlots willing to nod, agree to our destruction and spread legs. They’re nice to those women, hoping to be promiscuous. Does a man of principles really exist anymore? Culturally, it does not. There is no slut shaming patriarchal male, he is dead and replaced by a hypocritical man-slut. Who would respect that, in their right mind? Women respond to incentives. If you’re nice to aborting sluts, treat them as the good women, the birth rate’s gonna go down. Who you are warm towards isn’t trivial.

How do you kill a slut? Ignore them and reject them. That’s it. That’s all they need to do. They don’t.

They chose death.

One generation earlier;

Tolerant left wants to censor private conversations

The Left always become tyrannical oppressors over time, who end up mass slaughtering the people who won’t tolerate it. Lefty bigots.

Trump, when is he banning companies from getting involved in politics?

This is anti-democratic.

I told you not to talk to them. They have nobody to attack any more, nothing to fight – this makes them impotent. If you don’t cut the head off the Hydra, it can’t grow more! Avoid the control freaks (isolate them like they want – safe space?) or they will get you arrested. You can’t fix the stupid. And you’re making them stronger with your eyeballs on their twitter etc. They feed from attention and they’re starving.

She wants to ban jokes.
Seriously. Why not make it the Meme Banning Bill?

State sponsored sense of humour! When do we get a list of requirements!

Vice police of the mind!

This is anti-safe space, does tumblr know?

All the fandoms that would die?

Most fandoms are millions of people in groups online.

Hey, they arrested people for making public opinions known so people hid in DM and PMs and the like, how is this surprising? But how will they ban any forum? (members 500+)

YOU CAN’T KILL AN IDEA, LABOURITE.

They want to break up large groups so they can pick off each group and the others aren’t warned about this or tactics in good time to respond. A group of minds is essentially a supercomputer and trained on political info (e.g. Q) can uncover many things.

The sluts have the most to fear from this, because if they ban private conversations, all your flirting online will have to be public. All the girls will see all the tactics you try on the others.

This ruins freedom of association, including intimate (emotionally intimate) conversations. They’re trying to call everyone else a cult… the New Church Ladies.

It isn’t about women, that’s a straw man. They don’t like being questioned, especially journalists, anyone with bias. There shouldn’t be “protected groups”, we must be equal under the law? They’re allowed to judge us, we aren’t allowed to judge them (r-types fear The Mob).

She should fuck off and take her menopause meds instead of taking it out on us that she isn’t getting enough follows on twitter. Yeah, you can’t force people to like your message, Mz Hitler! All their signals are turning against them, because their mask is slipping….

And by banning all others rhetoric, that’s what they’re trying to do, they think they can force people back asleep.

She could start a blog but people have to be dedicated to read those and you can’t really shame people for seeking out ideas, a liberal principle. It’s freedom of speech. One reason I don’t advertise or shill. I’m not harming a fly over here so…. where’s the grounds?

Logically, she’d have to ban large social gatherings, including pubs. In London, the largest social gatherings happen in mosques….. so…. nothing will happen. Khan won’t let it.

She’s carping about online harassment, when that’s an SJW-pushed thing. Well, wouldn’t this then apply to all the SJWs who go around monstering random, normal people? Trying to ruin their lives? One rule for plebs, is it?

And you wondered why nobody wanted to vote for “I’ll make upsetting Muslims illegal!” Miliband? We know that ends in a very literal test of the phrase “sticks and stones…” or a gay club shooting. Let them all have their bloody diversity, don’t lift a finger.

She implicitly admitted she starts arguments with people then gets all triggered when they argue back? Like people? Maybe don’t get angry at everything?

You can’t win without having the debate first, you dumb cow.

You people have been politically retarded since the Blair era, they haven’t adapted for the times whatsoever and expect the rest of us to slow our roll.

You don’t have to have a twitter account. You don’t have to use the internet. Go home, old hag, you clearly hate what the internet is about. Nobody gives a shit if you’re an MP if your points suck donkey balls. Those people disagreeing were trying to help you! Become more relevant!

The internet is not for people like her, she isn’t tall enough for this ride.

Young people aren’t buying papers these days, let alone The Guardian (its readership is dead/dying, look up the data). If they had a paywall, their traffic count couldn’t justify all those journalists – and you know they wouldn’t fire all the white ones! The Guardian’s white journalists rake in the majority of their traffic because the Boomers reading it only want to read them (e.g. Toynbee).

This is Old Media (dying media) protectionism.

If politics is a “science”, they can hide data behind paywalls far, far away from the voting plebs!

#LovingLiberals

Because the Left cannot convince people with results, they always eventually end up wishing to line up all “opponents” against a wall for Socialist Firing Squads.

This is “stop hitting yourself” level, God doesn’t punish the righteous.

If they shot you, they could steal your stuff even easier. Such people have nothing to lose. Society never doles out their consequences because freedom of association died with race relations acts.

SJWs are witch-hunting liberals

control freaks don’t stop

they go after everyone eventually

told ya so

listen to this

That email is the mask drop of personality disorders. I’m surprised they didn’t tell him to kill himself, that’s what these losers usually do.

Being a professional = Being a “Nazi”.

Wow. A clear example of the PC Code.

Useful idiots love to dehumanize, because dehumanizing is evil and you should be punched for being a “Nazi” because you triggered our Hulk RAGE.

if they could line up all the people they hate against a wall and shoot them, well, eventually the Left does this

historically, hence

“Liberals get the bullet first” – Marxists

That’s why the Nazis were Left. First thing the socialists did was lock up the Communists, they knew.

The purpose of the “warning” email is clear: if you won’t toe the Party Line, you deserve whatever we do to you, you have no human rights. It’s gaslighting, like the domestic abuser who says “you deserved it, you made me angry”. They don’t expect you to believe it, but their defense will be moralistic and oppressive (because they believe they invent good and evil, it’s narcissism).

I’m pretty sure a lot of these men/women/neither have a full suite of mental problems and use it as an excuse to crusade. It’s Crusaderism. There’s the sadism of crushing anyone who displeases you.

Because badfeels should be outlawed?

No, you are responsible for your own feelings, snowflake.

Gay men can be homophobic, according to an SJW.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/08/20/the-crime-of-sjw-lies/

Sure, it’s political, it definitely isn’t a religion!

It definitely isn’t a weapon to crush people they hate, obviously not!

Trying to ruin someone’s reputation and livelihood is illegal. It’s social and financial murder. Go after the witch mobs in court. It’s the ONLY way the control freaks will stop – if they lose control. These laws exist because reputation is important, it must be honest. The malice of the SJW will destroy themselves (but who cares?) although it’ll take civilization down with it.

Witch hunters exist. Enforce the law.

Scruton, frauds of the University elite

Starts around 14m

Book mentioned:

Making things up so nobody can falsify it. Gibberish.

We used to put deluded psychotics in asylums?

Taking power from the right then lowering standards until it’s run into the ground.
We won’t step in and save it (at least, I hope nobody cucks).

Difference of power but no biological differences? Haven’t read Darwin, huh?

It is impossible, they do write fairytales and get angry with the common man, his privilege of living in real reality with objective results compared to their unreality of how things “should be” according to their religion, where Governments are God and NGOs don’t exist.

National debt triggers them because it shows their God isn’t omnipotent.
Their Satan figure isn’t who they think: it’s fractional reserve banking.

They genuinely believe (snort) that a dollar in their hand (snort) is actually worth (snort) one dollar!

Should’ve mentioned the classism, hegemony is too civil.

Hegemony from whom?

Here, the White Working Class. It is exclusive, but where it used to be race or sex, it’s now class and whites.

Unis might as well have signs up saying No Whites No Poors No Hotties

all forms of “privilege” as cited justification for human rights abuses.

The indigenous people who pay their taxes and maybe pensions. The foreign students won’t bail them out, they’ll be long gone. Not their debt though.

Later it’ll be “I was just following orders”… nope!

If they care about the poor, why not outsource MOOCs for intro level courses, age-restriction free? (since ageism is wrong)…

They don’t want to teach you, they want to own you.

It’s a debt Ponzi with a veneer of prestigious “education”.

However, the curriculum is totally different than when they stole the institutions with that prestige and now their status is tanking, it’s deserved.

The purpose of Marx, for example, isn’t to help the poor. He aims to use the poor like a tool. Capitalism has helped more poor people if you actually look. The purpose of Marx is to justify theft (including rape, if you think about it, to take anything “needed”*, entitlement to any resource from a blood bond**) and because humans rebel against rights violations for continued survival, eventually mass murder (since only the many can provide for the few in the Party***, like a large field is quickly overtaken with a very small number of locust). The appetites of man vary and some are insatiable, whether they call them needs or urges.

*This explains all the lefty rape scandals, including the SWP.

** Technically, you can’t get more racist than Communism. They deem humans a race and then try to rob you to death for belonging to that race (including robbing you of the right to flee or disagree, for example). Heads I am entitled, tails you owe me. It’s a death cult.

***Anyone who wants to become a politician, in a logical society, should get shot instantly. It’s akin to saying “I’m a psychopath, let me in your kitchen with all the knives!” It should be a minimum wage, secondary job with no prestige whatsoever.

Nobody has profiled the true basis of modern thought. They are consumerist but more sensory, purely hedonism than owning things to look at it (abstain from destruction). If they can’t eat it or show off with it or fuck it, the left wing doesn’t want it. It’s the most consumerist position available because they want to make it a part of themselves or remove it from the world.
I can’t be bothered to detail why or how I came to know this so I’ll throw it here for others to look.

The core of Marx’s works and all who came after.

Look into the Marquis de Sade.

“Nature, who for the perfect maintenance of the laws of her general equilibrium, has sometimes need of vices and sometimes of virtues, inspires now this impulse, now that one, in accordance with what she requires”

If I attributed that to Marx, you would’ve believed me. The original moral relativist, he hired a maid and tortured her.

Her rights were relatively unimportant to him. A rope would be relatively applied to his neck if he weren’t rich.

Anyone who deserves the death penalty is a “relativist”, ever notice that?
They aren’t balanced and passive as you’d expect from the theory (that’s Buddhism and has many absolutes) but actively destructive and immoral for the thrill and novelty (r). How can they “explore” a line, as they often intellectualize, if the line does not exist?

He was a monster who should’ve been hanged and we are living in his philosophy, gone mainstream.
There is the source of your degeneracy.

Man has always been consumed by his appetites individually but never so encouraged, socially, never bailed out consequentially, never forgiven publicly (only by the MSM, look at the DM’s attitude to adultery or any use of “romp”) and never so indulged financially at the expense of others.

We don’t let the losers lose. We treat every degenerate like a prince of old, coddled into a mess of chaos that consumes us with them. Pathological altruism. Russell Brand should be mocked a la Harlot’s Progress.

Do the SJWs ever bring up de Sade? This would be telling, he’s the poster boy of male privilege.

Nope, or they call him a “libertine” hero.

Pedophile. Hero. Seriously.