Just enforce the law already?

We’re returning to 50s morality where strangers can’t talk to one another without it being weird.

Here, it’s still pretty weird and not just a London thing, it’s English and cultural.

LEWDNESS IS ALREADY ILLEGAL.

Disturbing the peace and other offences.

Honour culture coming back. We didn’t need to say it plainly to fellow high IQ Europeans with a Christian culture. Criminal White men who tried it on were fought with canes, umbrellas and hat pins. They tried to claim sexist, despite attacking first. We could stop the conflicts any time we like with deportations of rule-breakers. One strike and you’re out, we have the CCTV. But is it worth hurting some poor white girl for existing, for someone who doesn’t have to be here in the first place, should we wait until there’s already a trauma? Women don’t respond to sexual attention in public like men, it’s a negative experience. Singling out a person in public is bullying. When it’s sexual, it’s acting like looking good is a sin (so women dress more like men and they’re still whining). Women don’t need to act like men or the way predators want them to act (gaslighting, “you should take it as a compliment!” – nope, still illegal). It’s humiliating, intentionally, it’s mocking, equivalent to groping a child (also low testosterone). It’s forced sexualization so traditional men are most opposed to harassment, the street isn’t a free-for-all brothel – the assumption is No. We don’t allow one group (children) to be harmed in public (by those who find them sexually attractive) blithely (children can’t help looking cute/what they are either) so no, this isn’t Brave New World, there is no entitlement to the bodies of others. You can’t rob a bakery because you’re hungry, we expect people in the First World to act like a human, dogs can have more control on these matters! Does cake before a hungry man have more rights than a white woman in her homeland? Who do we care about more, ingroup safety or outgroup “honour”? Who is we? Guest right has long expired. Social trust is more important than anyone’s feigned feelings of dishonour, they dishonoured themselves by their criminal actions.

This problem won’t go away. The lower IQ, the weaker self control. Weak-willed people have no excuse. If you don’t like the West, move. You aren’t important.

The subtext is: to prevent harassment/rape, women should look less like women.

This has never been true. It’s a blatant lie, blaming the victim. Covered head to toe, women are attacked and have been historically. It’s like saying a poor man is never robbed. And how can a rich man or an attractive woman stop being, stop existing? Laughable psychopathy on display, to insist the world magically alter its properties because these people don’t want to control their degeneracy. The predator DESERVES to be met with force.

Victims don’t deserve it, that’s a just world fallacy!

Maybe if you’re nice to the tiger/Muslim, it won’t eat/rape you! That isn’t how predation works, cuck.

Should you take it as a compliment that a burglar found your house “nice enough” to rob? You should enjoy the slanderous “attentions” of the SJWs!

The real meaning is “let us”, be completely passive, let us harm you and play along (don’t “snitch” and assert your human rights). We don’t take that aiding and abetting, enabling approach to predators in the civilized world.

A straight male sexual predator will be attracted to women because they’re women, whatever they look like. You cannot help being in that category. It’s genetic, the way you were born and exist. Like a child cannot help being in a pedophile’s predation group. Is it their fault for looking too cute? Should we ban cuteness? Predators are a sheer minority and we mustn’t fall for their tricks or lies in enabling them. They are wrong, not the people they harm. There is no Original Sin of whiteness or attractiveness, unless you’re insane.

But harassment’s always been illegal?

Why should your culture come last? That’s why they are there, to be in your culture.

The hypoagency proclaimed by sexual predators is detestable. Going to a nudist beach shouldn’t “provoke” rape, you piece of shit. Children walk around naked too…. just saying.

We are not America. They allowed in the past century, their laws to slide to speak to and treat one another like shit. Watch how many harassment laws they break on “prank” shows to lube you up for it. That isn’t funny.

https://www.rt.com/news/434993-france-whistling-bill-women/

Meanwhile, not a word on groping, grabbing, rape.

What’s key is … that the laws of the French republic forbid insulting, intimidating, threatening and following women in public spaces,” 

They need these laws now. How long until more etiquette laws are brought in?
The PUA scam pretends to sell non-white men a method for turning any white woman into a free whore. It’s a scam but the “techniques” which legally qualify as harassment will land them in court eventually, including incitement to harass, I tried warning for years. They made their bed. Prison bed.

It’s incitement to harass on a sexual (sex, noun) and race basis too, so like… triple illegal.

If you ask a question more than once, it’s coercion. Goes for sales too. If the first No isn’t respected, why should the 20th? Although wearing someone down is an abuse tactic.

It’s like the French women who had to move but still said diversity was good because, men don’t realize, they might literally be murdered for saying anything less to the press. Diversity takes away your liberty. To know who rules over you…

Cut off the welfare state to the non-French and they’ll leave. It’s the only way to handle an infestation of leeches, cut off supply.

Emma Thompson complains her daughter was grabbed but says nothing about the legal right to self-defense or fear of being stabbed and melted with acid.

When you can’t defend yourself, you’re a slave.

Meanwhile, on the child connection

https://yournewswire.com/french-law-children-consent-sex/

ageism!

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2018/08/03/01016-20180803ARTFIG00271-consentement-sexuel-la-loi-ne-pose-pas-de-limite-d-age.php

Minors cannot consent. Set it to 18/age of majority!

“Women used to be ladies”

The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.

TLDR; read bolded.

It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).

Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.

Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.

“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”

It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.

Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.


Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.


Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?

Especially those in other time periods.

^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.

Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.

In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.

Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.

This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?

Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.

Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.

Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.

The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.

Everything you know is wrong.

Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.

Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!

Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Casual or modest, pick ONE.

I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.

This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!

He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?

The problem is male demand.

Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.

You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.

You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.

Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?

More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.

Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?

Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…

Which fork, Forney?

They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.

Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.

The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.

This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.

These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?

Are you quite sure?

They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.

Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.

Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.

However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.

Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.

You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.

Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.

Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.

I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?

Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.

Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.

Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.

We mock idiots like you.