Is “homemaker” the new welfare queen?

PSA in case they’re trying this bullshit.

Rhetorical question, naturally.

Clarification:

Cook/chef is a job.
Cleaner is a job.
Working from home (for a company, yours or another) is a job.
Motherhood is a job. Fatherhood is a job. Nanny is a job.
Driver is a job.
Housekeeper is a job.

With me so far?

Home-maker …is not a job.

Sitting at home… is not a job.

Existing among four walls …. is not a job.

Stop.

Please, just stop.

We all do that. You are not special and have given nothing of value to the world, you have no insightful conservative thoughts by merely sitting in a house and occasionally tidying. We do that too! Full grown adults!

An “allowance” is a gift, not income. Legally.

There are also legal limits on how much you can get and they’re low.

You know who got an allowance? Playboy whores in the mansion. Were they ‘homemakers’ too?

And the way they normalise their husband’s financial abuse is pure cringe like sorry, he allows you to leave the house? Is this Yemen?

He allows you to drive? Is this Saudi Arabia?

You have curfew? Is this martial law?

He supports you…. doing what, exactly? What’s your job title? (Hint: On your taxes).

Creepy creepy infantilisation of a sexually active adult and we’re supposed to sit here and act like that’s normal.

No, that’s never been normal. Stop trying to make homemaker culture happen.

Video game addicts have more value to society than you. They assist GDP.

I bet they’re secretly camwhores the other 12 hours of the day they’re not cooking.

You replace your hubby’s need to order takeaway and? Walking the dog doesn’t take that long.

The past six months I’ve seen these hoes show up, all with the same routine:

*giggle* “I don’t have to get a part-time job! I’m so lucky!” *humblebrags for attention*

You mean, he won’t allow you? That’s illegal.

No one will be surprised when they eventually snap. Even dogs can’t be confined like that for long periods of time. They will go mental. Otherwise, rich idiot hubby loses the money at some point in the decade-long future and they either leave or she gets a job anyway like a self-sufficient adult.

THE HORROR.

And what if she’s widowed? Like come on, you do need a job or to be able to have a CV of some description, you stupid bitches. The state won’t treat you like the mental child you are.

This is all so disgusting. You know if the husband changed his line of work, they’d leave him too.

If he’s literally paying them to <exist>, of course they’re going to be speaking about husband in glowing terms… not because they like him! Not because they respect him! Not because they believe in marriage! Classic meal ticket!

Having a wet hole is not a job. If you can’t put it on a CV, it isn’t work.

This also goes for kept gay guys. A growing situation too.

They will need to earn a crust eventually.

After all those years (not-so-secretly) looking down on women who earn their own food.

Like a grown-up.

Or who’ll be expected to bail them out? Taxpayers.

Actual housewives don’t brag about living off their husband, they’re too busy contributing to the marriage. These bitches are unfairly yoked.

These people do not represent conservatives, we have correct time preference and plan things.

Who’s targeting who? Is it controlling psychopaths targeting entitled female narcs?

Marriage is NOT a status. It doesn’t make you a superior being. It’s a role.

Reminds me of this:

and this

Being the black section.

That is not traditional marriage, America. Women worked in ancient times, in Proverbs 31, they worked alongside the men up until factories in the 19th century, then they literally did the same work from home or in other factories. They didn’t just sit there 90% of the time.

You would be fired. 

Sitting at home with hundreds of hours of leisure time per month is not an occupation.

You’re a welfare wife. You are a trophy.

I don’t know a single married mother during the 50s who didn’t have part-time minimum paid work at some point. It is necessary. That was the 50s economy!

Bluebearding a woman with something more confining than prison (they can work and walk around outside without being questioned) is bound to end terribly at some point… and the SJWs will seize upon it to smear actual housewives and stay-at-home mothers and fathers.

I can see it coming. A mile off. I have warned you.

It’s a dysfunctional mini-commune model larping as right-wing.

They call it a job but get defensive when you ask if their income was on their tax returns…. like, yes Karen, that’s what job means.

It’s a legal term. Where’s your employment contract? Which tax forms do you file?

[I found this out by accident, inquiring out of genuine interest.]

You can’t just throw around those words or it’s my duty to report you as a domestic slave.

Is your home an LLC? Well, you called it a “business”, Karen. Words have meanings.

Workers also have to fully comply with national occupational laws and have job security.

Your husband or otherwise breadwinner can leave you at any time. That, in Russia, is called an “arrangement”.

Jobs are involved, but it is not a job.

This has been a PSA.

Fuck lazy people. Don’t call it a job. I can report you to the IRS.

Work minus worker’s laws = slavery. Don’t try me, Karens.

This is like a weird new cult thing springing up among conservathots and I want nothing to do with it.

It feels culty. Stepford Wife culty. Lifestyle ‘blogging’ is not a job.

They’re trying to hide their leftie laziness behind people with honest right-wing positions.

You are not a housekeeper because you open the door or an entrepreneur because you have social media to post the grandiose nothing happening and you stole a once-pure term to be a housebound thot.

Is this the new Pokemon form of gold digger?

Like the man doesn’t MAKE the home possible by funding it? Such shade.

It’s such a pretentious term over housewife. They’re 100% dependent on a man but act like feminists too.

Stay at home, sure but quit fucking gloating about it like you’re doing the world a favour.

Picture 1: my face. In the house.

Picture 2: my face. In the house.

Picture 3: my face. In the house.

Caption: women who use their sexuality are evil! I’m such a /nice girl, be “feminine” and useless to the world like me! teeheehee! 

You have literally accomplished nothing.

Cults of personality reee. Men don’t need to worship you for a magic ring, Galadriel.

You didn’t invent femininity and it doesn’t involve sitting around being a literal useless cunt.
There’s no such thing as an activist for anything, they’re all missionaries. It’s classic Crusaderism.

RUN.

It feels like narcissistic mothers in-training, spare the children!

The whole routine is fake, guys watching. All of it. Just listen closely for passive-aggression, weird statements and screencap the occasional lapse (every 2 mins) in the narc mask.

So much pings as out-of-place. I’ve been sitting on this waiting for these women to contribute.

[I am better looking than these women, by the way, it just pisses me off they’re claiming to represent ALL women the same way, suspiciously, that the SJWs claim to represent ALL women too. Fuck off we can represent ourselves, Saint Jolie 2. Bring the “community” together? Horse-shit. Conservatives don’t believe in multicultural utopia.]

White women just picking up the Asian waifu fake femininity bullshit. Complete with mannerisms.

You’ll note, for the court, that ‘being feminine’ entails doing all the things they wanted to do anyway and none of the things they don’t?

Cultural camwhores with pussywhipped rich idiot husbands. If it’s so fulfilling why are you fucking micro-blogging your every last excruciatingly dull thought? Why that urge?

I don’t post personal life on here because …. the urge never strikes. I don’t tell personal stories. I actually don’t get why they want to share any family business online. Why?

Relevant:

https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm

It also has various verses prohibiting prostitution and pride.

10 For even while we were with you, we gave you this command: “If anyone is unwilling to work, he shall not eat.” 11 Yet we hear that some of you are leading undisciplined lives and accomplishing nothing but being busybodies12 We command and urge such people by our Lord Jesus Christ to begin working quietly to earn their own living

I’m sure these saints with cunts know better than the Bible, right?

“14 Take note of anyone who does not obey the instructions we have given in this letter. Do not associate with him, so that he may be ashamed.”

Living off a man like a tick is so #trad, huh?

Same ones shaming other women for having a better figure? Missed the verse where that was evil, little Mrs Communal Narcissist.

They make all women look bad. Sainthood isn’t handed over as part of the marriage ceremony.

Imagine what they’ll be like in a decade or two. Wow.

There is no Sisterhood. Stop acting like you’re on my side. I see you.

Conservasnatch is still censorship Church missionary ‘feed the world’ bullshit. I see you.

This is just a sighting of the Old Crazy Church Lady before she got old, pretending her feminine wiles are better than sluts’ wiles.

They’re even playing Christian for clicks while reaching out to Muslim women. Go die in a fire, Karen.

Holy fire.

This doesn’t add up. None of it. Calling it out.

CHINOs don’t get to tell every other woman on the planet what makes them a woman.

Fuck off.

Welfare queens do the same thing. Sit at home. Me-me-me social media. Get an allowance.

Not a job.

If they claim it’s a job, report them to the IRS. I am serious. Especially if they’re getting shekels with the online homemaker routine, like that’s any less attention-whoring than a Kardashian with her tits out. Bitch, you ain’t better.

You’re late

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

I was discussing the Signalling Right and fake Ks years ago.

The rightist Swine is a nominally conservative type who is openly promoting traditional values such as God, homeland and family but in reality he’s a treacherous calculated Machiavellian type of low moral virtue, high time preference and low loyalty.

Fake Ks playing both sides. Won’t work.

You can’t “Have it All.”

The same way a leftist activist is constantly talking about the oppressed proletariat and while raising his own political power and enriching himself with other people’s money, the Swine of the Right is constantly talking about the virtue

There’s your problem.
No moral authority.

I’ve said this.

of raising a family, the depth of his faith and the love of his homeland, and at the same time using every possible opportunity to raise his political power and wealth in the most corrupt and criminal way possible, regardless of the consequence to the things he nominally holds dear. The Swine usually has very little manners, and behaves like a brute

Know them by their fruit blah blah blah yada yada.

You know this point. I won’t repeat this point.

despite of his education. In short, The Swine is a swindler and a charlatan who successfully uses right wing rhetoric

Con artist.

Like a tithe for political signalling.

Signal with YOUR LIFE.

Live it or GTFO.

I’m tired of tradlarp men who are like marriage and kids for thee but not for me. Slutting is evil unless I’m doing it. We need strong fighting men but the draft is mean.

Or the worst, fence-sitting: I’m a social liberal, economic conversative. trans. Everyone must like me! Please like me!

That is a cuck. Selfish individualists.

Impossible too. You want a huge national debt then? How else pay for the liberalism? It’s a black hole.

Libertarians who want to shackle others with the free shit they believe should exist. The liberal picking someone else’s pockets and calling it charity.

It isn’t charity with someone else’s money.

Craven pricks.

to expand his wealth and political power. In a way, he is either a communist apparatchik who successfully replaced the hammer and a sickle with the cross or the village brute who finds it very convenient to sit in the first row on a Sunday mass.

They think traditionalism = hating women and using them like slaves.
They are that bestial. And ignorant of history. Like divorce was invented in the 1960s? Like cheating on a spouse is normal or Biblical? Like women are large children instead of ..women? Like they don’t make an effort in the homemaking thing? Like love matches don’t have rules? Like fornication is okay? Like alcoholism is necessary? Like courtship is for suckers? They assume the shallow 20th century lies about how these things worked.

It’s like the porn star pretending to be Born-Again Christian (there is no such thing as Born-Again, anything, that’s prideful) once her career tanks.

You can’t cash out with a clean slate.

God can see.

comment: Conservatives offered realism and a sense of human limits to the Lefts quest for perfection. They misunderstood Tradition – which is about the quest for perfection just as much as Leftism is. Had the Right offered its own version of the quest for perfection, it might have stood a chance.

They think we’ll be so weak as to forgive them like it’s a human thing. Worse, treat them as superior for having the “experience” of deliberate evil. No, Russell Brand. Your status here is worm. Earn your keep quietly for decades before lecturing the faithful. We are not grateful you’re here, we existed before. You can’t fake this.

They’re holier than thou atheists. It’s creepy. We don’t need their input.

They have no character and we can’t treat dishonorable people otherwise.

We refuse to treat the local slut like a monk. Fuck off.

The only light you’ve seen is on an ATM. We won’t corrupt ourselves and shelter you.

Comic: Everything wrong with STEM

I made this.

I’m tired of the lies.

Fight me with your shitty string theories and un-predictive climate models.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

Best is the 9/10 MIT tries to pass off ancient science as ‘radical innovation’.
You, American taxpayer, are paying for their ego trips. Here’s some wi-fi pin art.

https://www.sciencemuseumshop.co.uk/exhibition-ranges/wonderlab-collection/wonderlab-forces/science_museum_pin_art.htm

It’s getting like modern art.
If you disapprove of the misuse of funds, you just don’t understand it because you’re stupid, right?

Creative people know most of what they make e.g. author first drafts, sucks. It completely sucks. You have to embrace the suck. Unless you’re being state subsidized to suck.

No, Peterson, no

I tried watching some basic videos I’d never normally click on as a test.
Topics I knew from reading and speaking to experts.
This was the average level of offender. Little scientism neat stories there.

Raises no eyebrows with the Pitbull IQ host who talks too much.

LISTEN AND BELIEVE.

ANYTHING I LIKE IS EVOLUTION.

What is free will, the law or the naturalistic fallacy?

This is him without prep, he only sounds smart when he’s prepared for the conversations.

Jordan Peterson either thinks he’s smarter than he is (read more) or he’s trolling internet intellectuals for shekels, knowing they won’t look it up because who cares about the truth? I bet 2.

He is not an evobio guy, you’d be better off asking Richard Dawkins!
Someone, on Twitter! Please!

The men wouldn’t have been allowed close enough to GET rejected.
Society invented courting and bachelorhood to keep order, once all males were allowed to survive for labour.

Hypergamy doesn’t even mean what these people think, it’s a marriage construct. Nothing to do with sex, especially sterile sex. Biology of fertility and children (evolution) doesn’t apply to the infertile or sterile. STDs don’t apply to monks for the same reason. Where do they get it???

Marriage construct because marriage is how you access resources? Duh?

We have twice as many female ancestors because 1. they did less stupid things, 2. they were more connected to tribe, 3. no intersexual competition that ends in death, 4. no survival based rite of passage (throwing them out when of age) and 5. no need to display to the opposite sex. Most men would have died beforehand or been killed in the attempt to access them long before social rejection was possible. Tribes were NOT PC. There was NO benefit of the doubt, especially for a stranger trying to access the nubile, do not be dense. Men were known to be rapists and that is why rape developed as a strategy, the losers who wouldn’t be permitted mating opportunities any other way. The contempt for everyone in that. Our disgust is a wholesale rejection of our being.

This age is incredibly eugenic because the rapist types are usually sterile/frigid/impotent, pick a term, the kids don’t breed/are aborted or the woman is on the Pill. This is the most eugenic time period in living memory, and in all of human history. It’s a cleansing. Trust Malthus to take out the trash that appears successful in false conditions (socialism). Liberals aren’t even breeding, smart ones!

He’ll never ever talk about that. He would drag his raw balls over broken glass first.

Women would get a say, but more the parents. It wasn’t just the father. Brothers might take the father’s place, say, for a fight, but the mother held sway over the brothers. Experience and blood connection counted.

Mother Nature is a eugenicist. It’s about quality and survival.

Human genocide and rape after war aren’t accounted for either, despite occurring in chimps so he does know, I can assure you. Plenty of men are poor quality, stop stroking their cock Peterson. We aren’t “meant to” evolve for anything, ask JF, a biologist. It’s such a romantic view? What a strawman. Courtly love is recent you dumb fuck? Like I could disprove that with wikipedia, it’s mostly a French thing too, what, did nobody else evolve? Was the memo to the whole species written in Frog?

The sneaky fucker thing is rape because they have to present themselves dishonestly, knowing their poor quality. They want to force acceptance. You’ll always have the stupid ones as exception thinking it’s about body language or some shit like “alpha dominance” *cough* but even they know to hide, it’s instinct and hardly a social thing, they would sneak into the tribe once the real men were away hunting and the females were vulnerable. They rarely interacted with the men. They’d also be deadbeats after any rape, classic r-type. A male just wanting sex and no investment is not viable, in society, to society, to women or in biology.

This is painful to watch.

Mammals are different. Harlow’s monkeys?

Taking a real thing, interesting and twisting it into shit. It’s like modern art with science. I hope you’re not paying this man.

Of course heroes exist but they hardly bred more than average, Genghis Khan was a rapist. This is known. The shitty males weren’t romancing themselves with stories, what are you on, Jordan? What are you smoking?

We tell stories about bad people far more than good ones. Fairy tales? Old ones?

Beta male has three meanings

  1. shit internet one, means nothing. Used here.
  2. Evobio, deference but not sexual, social with sometimes sexual outcomes, it’s seen in the military and chosen, earned. Royalty’s ancestors were at some point battle victors.
  3. Sexual attractiveness, subpar but chosen nonetheless. This is sometimes used to refer to parents, a little inaccurately. Evolutionally, breeders win. All parents are in the running for alpha but it’s based on quality. Beta bux is not true, as I’ve linked to studies before. Parental Investment shows that doting fathers have better odds than the sneaky fuckers who call themselves alpha but are truly deadbeats. You could relate it to masculinity but it isn’t bravado or aggression, those are low class status signals to get attention. Masculinity has always been the Patriarch, the father figure who stays and is a good man. Greece fell because Zeus fucked around, pagans are scrubbers.

Male feminists (SJWs) have many issues, I cannot list them all here.

They hate themselves, it needn’t be about the women, that’s why they often wanna become women. Trying to gain trust based on lies is the act of a sexual predator, which most douchebags viewing this would call alpha “game” (the game is lying) because they believe all the tropes about cavemen in cartoons, when rapists were brained with a rock (yes, I agree, let’s do that again). You are not smarter than them larping Johnny Bravo. Did anyone respect him?

The Left won’t stop hitting itself

Just let it.

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-left-punishes-itselfmercilessly-and.html

Just let it happen.

Stop bailing them out like a doting father does his Princess because they begged for mercy, bleeding heart in hand. These are not your people, they are not your problem. They can go to their own, the politicians and the people who donate less to charity cases in studies, the ‘nice’ people.

Don’t be afraid to laugh at them. Their situation, their stupidity, and the fact narcissists think they can always fool you into paying for their decisions with “I didn’t know”.

This is their greatest thrill, to trick you and get everything free, on you.

The proof positive is how they back down once it’s clear you’re onto the lie: I didn’t know becomes I don’t care, you still owe me.

That isn’t a special appeal for mercy (still a fallacy), an appeal to exception, it’s a threat.

A psychopath is essentially a malignant narcissist, they are interchangeable

Traits here
http://nordic.businessinsider.com/15-signs-your-coworker-is-a-psychopath-2017-11/

The psychopathic tendency to not care about the consequences of their actions, no matter how badly they affect others, can be linked to their “remarkable ability to rationalize their behavior,” according to Hare.

While their friends and family may be physically or emotionally hurt by the psychopath’s actions, he or she will typically just deflect the blame with excuses or flat-out deny it.