WHO invading UK via Boris – medical martial law

This is treason. Nobody is talking about this – especially controlled ops like Brand.

It’s being suppressed, but talk about how you’re on Johnny Depp’s dick. That’ll help. Simps.

https://www.rebelnews.com/uk_set_to_join_who_pandemic_treaty_to_tackle_the_next_pandemic

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/26/who-pandemic-treaty-threat-to-your-freedom/

MSM are suppressing this so it goes through soon (just over a week) to use for Bill Gates’ monkeypox control grab for Cabal.

No more nation, worse than EU, more One World Gov.

But talk about some circus show set in a court room. Real patriotic. Meanwhile the New World Order rises and Britcoin wants everyone to go cashless with an inescapable social credit system of green taxes thanks to a random Paki married to a billionaire pretending to represent us. They’re waiting until schools start to go out, teens have exams and most people are distracted by summer holidays.

Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

They’ll use this to rope in America too, America would die with us. It’s more than the UK.

2nd link:

The treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere. Not only would the treaty empower the WHO to mandate COVID jabs and vaccine passports globally, it could potentially also expand the WHO’s power to dictate all health care policy worldwide.”

Even Vox Day won’t touch this because the WHO is in the CCP’s pockets, anti-white anti-Christ Marxist money, and he’s their biggest fanboy.

When some EU countries neighbouring Italy push them to mandate it across the EU, maybe he’ll pull his head out of his ass. UKRAINE WANTS IT. i haz receipts

“At the same time, it would cost each member country millions of dollars to participate in this process. As explained by Mohamed, the treaty will need to go through a voting process at the World Health Assembly in 2023. They need a majority for it to pass and, if passed, all member countries will be bound by it.”

Who’s in the World Health Assembly? you ask, sexily.

Most of the UN barring three non-entities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Assembly#Members,_observers_and_rules

The WHA has, currently, 194 member states (all UN members without Liechtenstein, plus the Cook Islands and Niue).[3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_United_Nations#Current_members

Includes Canada, Greece, ITALY (Vox), Japan, Mexico, shithole EE nations the manosphere HILARIOUSLY thinks they’ll escape to, and oh yeah – AMERICA.

So yes NWO rule by UN IS YOUR PROBLEM TOO.

Continue to waste time listening to HOURS of ‘found’ fabricated tapes and riding Depp’s dick.

LAND OF THE FREE? NOT FOR MUCH LONGER YOU BALD EAGLE LOVING BITCHES.

BIG DADDY BRITAIN IS TAKING YOU DOWN WITH US. SIGNAL BOOST. GET HYPE.

I posted how the WHO has funded studies to sterilise you.

Believe me now?

The UN was always a cover for One World Gov.

Another concern raised by Mohamed is that many countries don’t even know about this treaty as of yet, and it’s possible that the WHO might try to push for earlier implementation than 2024 — all without public participation or input. “It is undemocratic, it is unconstitutional and therefore it makes the treaty invalid and unlawful,” she says.

“The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights. It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people.”

“Equally, the WHO failed during the COVID-19 chapter as it encouraged lockdowns, suppressed early preventive treatments, and recommended product interventions that have proven to be neither safe nor effective.”

“The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda, nor enforce biosurveillance. While it receives funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit from WHO decisions and mandates.

For example, the Gates Foundation and the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine promotion alliance, contribute over $1 billion a year.””

Bill Gates as de facto President of America. Let that sink in.

Another concern is the fact that when people are harmed by the WHO’s health policies, there’s no accountability because the WHO has diplomatic immunity. According to Mohamed, “the WHO should not be making ANY decisions about world health in the future.”

Its power is already very significant, and the goal to turn the WHO into a global health dictatorship is virtually written into its constitution. Also, remember that the WHO removed the specificity of mass casualties from the definition of a pandemic, so now a pandemic can be just about any disease that occurs in multiple countries. Even obesity could theoretically qualify. So, the WHO could claim power over health care systems in any number of ways, given the chance.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-61435476

Funny that the symptoms of Monkeypox also seem to be those of Covid “vaccine” shedding.
Like a rash and feeling sick.
https://expose-news.com/2022/05/10/study-confidential-covid-vaccine-shedding/

A new study conducted by scientists at the University of Colorado confirms the vast majority of humanity have had absolutely no choice in the matter of whether they wish to get the Covid-19 injection or not because the vaccinated have been transmitting antibodies generated by the injections through aerosols.

The findings should however come as no surprise, because a confidential Pfizer document had already confirmed exposure to the mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been given the Covid-19 jab.

DS: but for how long?

They also unfortunately add weight to the claims made by Dr Phillipe van Welbergen, who demonstrated that graphene, an alleged undisclosed ingredient of the Covid-19 injections, is being transmitted from the vaccinated to the not-vaccinated and destroying red blood cells and causing dangerous blood clots.” see below for more

https://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/health/monkeypox-symptoms-how-you-catch-26911522

https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/05/09/monkeypox-what-we-know-so-far-about-the-smallpox-like-virus-detected-in-the-uk

https://www.thesun.co.uk/health/7237256/monkeypox-symptoms-treatments/

Shedding

The latest study, titled ‘Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity’, and published 1st May 2022, was conducted by the following scientists for the University of Colorado –

  • Ross M. Kedl, Elena Hsieh,
  • Thomas E. Morrison,
  • Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes,
  • Siobhan Flaherty,
  • Conner L. Jackson,
  • Rosemary Rochford.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full-text

The abstract of the study reads as follows –

Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated.

The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.

And here are the study authors main findings –

The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals.

Utilizing a flow cytometry-based Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (Fig 1A and B4,5 and a method previously used to elute antibody from rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS), we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday.

Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals (Fig 1C and D). It was therefore not surprising to detect both IgG and IgA following elution of antibody from face masks (Fig 1C and D).

Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route.

So they might’ve sterilised their kids, but social media liked them for five minutes.

“This means Covid-19 vaccine shedding is perfectly possible when we take into account a study performed on behalf of Pfizer in Japan.

The study observed the distribution of the Covid-19 injection in the bodies of Wister Rats over a period of 48 hours. One of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time. The highest concentration was noted in the liver. But it also accumulates in the salivary glands on the skin.”

bioweapon

Uterus is also quite high.

NOTE; TESTES DATA. WHY? COMPARABLE TO UTERUS.

It is not known if the injection continues to accumulate after 48 hours due to observations being stopped after this amount of time in the study. But these results coupled with the first study above tell us that for a minimum of 48 hours, an unvaccinated person is at risk of being exposed to the Covid-19 injection if they breathe the same air as or touch the skin of a person who has been vaccinated.

Study for six months, the WHO’s sterilant limit.

Pasting in case taken down:

This should however come as no surprise because Pfizer admitted as much in their ‘A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’ document.

The document contains a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity of someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.

In section 8.3.5 of the document it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?

Source

Well Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy. The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having being exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Or if a male family member of healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

Source

In Layman’s terms Pfizer are admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated.

[Fuckboys be like]

All of this makes the findings of Dr. Philippe van Welbergen all the more concerning.

Dr. Philippe van Welbergen (“Dr. Philippe”), Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn the public of the damage being caused to people’s blood by Covid injections by releasing images last year of blood samples under the microscope.

At the beginning of July 2021Dr. Philippe, was interviewed and explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.

Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood. 

Then in February 2022, Dr. Philippe presented images of his latest blood slides and explained what the images show. His slides show that vaccine-free patients have been “infected” with vaccine toxins through shedding, including what is claimed to be graphene.

A full review of his slides can be viewed here. But here’s a short clip of his presentation –

What Dr. Philippe van Welbergen demonstrated is that the graphene being injected into people is organising and growing into larger fibres and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge and the fibres are showing indications of more complex structures with striations.

He also demonstrated that “shards” of graphene are being transmitted from “vaccinated” to vaccine-free or unvaccinated people destroying their red blood cells and causing blood clots in the unvaccinated.

It would appear there was never any need to waste an exortionate amount of tax payers money on propaganda to coerce the public into getting the Covid-19 injections. Because the tax payer never had a choice in the matter. All they had to do was breathe.

About the kids, hope you weren’t expecting grandkids.

About the WHO:

“Under the guise of a ‘trust network,’ another initiative called Vaccination Credential Initiative (VCI) is also gaining momentum.

Partnering with big tech companies, big corporations, and big universities, VCI describes itself as ‘a voluntary coalition of public and private organizations committed to empowering individuals with access to verifiable clinical information including a trustworthy and verifiable copy of their vaccination records in digital or paper form using open, interoperable standards.’

VCI’s SMART Health Cards, as reported by Off-Guardian, are already implemented by ‘25 states in America, plus Puerto Rico and DC, and have become the US’s de-facto national passport.’ As explained in the article:

‘The US government, unlike many European countries, has not issued their own official vaccine passport, knowing such a move would rankle with the more Libertarian-leaning US public, not to mention get tangled in the question of state vs federal law.

The SMART cards allow them to sidestep this issue. They are technically only implemented by each state individually via agreements with VCI, which is technically a private entity. However, since the SMART cards are indirectly funded by the US government, their implementation across every state makes them a national standard in all but name.’” https://expose-news.com/2022/04/26/who-pandemic-treaty-threat-to-your-freedom/

Punch a cuck libertarian in the face today. A private company enslaving you is no better.

“Make no mistake, this catchy slogan is part and parcel of the Great Reset plan and cannot be separated from it, no matter how altruistic it may sound. Part of the “building back better” is to shift the financial system over to an all-digital centrally controlled currency system that is tied to a vaccine passport and/or digital identity system.”

Global Communism by first destroying the currencies, then nations and their economies. You’ll be begging to own nothing and be happy. There’ll be fake food GMO made by Bill Gates himself. Real meat farmers are being paid double under the table to cull entire flocks of chickens, I’ve heard reliably. Privatising the food supply is fucking stupid. This is terrorism.

Social Credit, influencers won’t fly due to carbon:

Together, they will form a pervasive system of social control, as desired behaviors can be incentivized and undesired ones discouraged through loss of various “privileges,” including access to your own finances. Digital currency can even be programmed by the issuer so that it can only be used for certain types of purchases or expenses.

While it’s going to be very difficult to stop this runaway train that is The Great Reset, part of our defense is to oppose and prevent the WHO’s pandemic treaty from becoming reality, as we’ll lose our national sovereignty if it does.

BRING OUT YOUR GENOME JUICED

The latest figures published by the UK Health Security Agency show that despite the elderly and vulnerable receiving a booster shot in September and October, and the NHS turning into the National Booster Service ever since, the triple/double vaccinated population still accounted for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 deaths throughout December 2021.

The ‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – 2022 – Week 1’ was published by the UK Health Security Agency (formerly Public Health England) on Thursday 6th January 2022, and it shows that the vast majority of Covid-19 cases between 6th Dec 21 and 2nd Jan 22 were among the fully vaccinated population.

This means the vaccinated population accounted for 75% of Covid-19 deaths between 6th Dec 21 and 2nd Jan 22, whilst the not-vaccinated accounted for just 25%.

With the vaccinated population accounting for 7 in every 10 Covid-19 cases, 6 in every 10 Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 8 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths, is there really any justification for turning the NHS into the National Booster Service and the introduction of vaccine passports in which an unvaccinated person must take a test to be permitted entry but a vaccinated person does not?

The Covid-19 injections do not prevent infection.

The Covid-19 injections do not prevent transmission.

According to the data it does not look like they prevent hospitalisation or death either.

The only thing that the Covid-19 injections currently prevent is the respect of the basic human rights afforded to every person prior to March 2020.

The fertility issues will cause the lynchings and torch-wielding mobs:

People work for family all their lives and nothing less. Even diehard bachelors say “family someday”. You take that dream away, they have nothing to live for anymore. And the men have nothing to stop them going postal on those who did it to them. Women can live vicariously through the children of other women, including cousins or strangers in a nursery. With men it’s a virility thing, you attack his balls and his genetic legacy and it’s personal. It doesn’t get more personal than chemical castration. Rich men building Empires would become extremely dangerous, probably the Mob leaders, arming them.

There’ll be a premium on pureblood eggs and sperm, especially if you have high IQ and passable looks.

https://thecovidworld.com/vaccinated-women-are-now-lying-about-their-vax-status-as-more-men-see-them-as-infertility-risk/

h/t Vox Day

LMAO

If men were smart, they’d enforce fraud laws in terms of medical claim e.g. a woman (or man) must disclose whether she took the modRNA if it’s shown (duh) to impair fertility, much like the UK law about pre-marital disclosure of STDs (because they impair fertility) or it’s grounds to void the union. It’s traditional and would enrage SJWs. Also disclose the entire medical file, including all infections, all medical procedures including cosmetic (must show photos before wedding) and that includes sex-‘change’ ops. This would be needed for informed consent anyway, just formalise it. They have a right to know if they’re marrying a barren wo/man.

From expose article:

“Today, we’re going to cover an even shadier application of vaccines.  That is the use of them to reduce fertility and even cause permanent sterilisation,” Dr. Bailey said.

The World Doctors Alliance, for example, posted a link on Telegram to a scientific paper published in May 2021 in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research (“IJVTPR”).  The paper described in detail the technology underlying Covid injections.  Its authors then reviewed several aspects including the spike protein toxicity and “shedding” – the transmission of the protein from a “vaccinated” to an “unvaccinated” person resulting in symptoms induced in the “unvaccinated” – offering a plausible mechanism of transmission via exosomes.  You can read the paper HERE….

It’s called live shedding. It’s been proven with flu vaccines.

I wonder how the fertility outcomes vary between the mutants and pureblooded but shed upon?
There’s no proven limit on spike shedding. None has been demonstrated.

If it’s lifelong, they’re walking biohazards.

HOWEVER, even sleeping with the mutants is the biggest shedding risk, especially men sleeping with women. Vaginal fluids would be full of the stuff but there are no studies, why not?

Depopulation. You know why.

Spike proteins might be re-classified as an STD. Calling it.

And the men would have grounds to sue the mutant as rape by fraud and fertility damages. Good.

Oct 1st deadline and shedding paper

I would’ve guessed September due to schools and universities.
Then there’s the magic bean branding of Poison AZ is worse than Poison PF. The illusion of choice.

So hypothetically we can sue the companies for damage from spike protein shedding, since we didn’t consent to take it into our body. Like trespassing, biochemically.

So good for you, the military in Australia is apparently using ‘task forces’ with the police to hold people down and inject them (chemical rape). I’ve asked for public videos I can link to about this, yet to see anything but it would make sense why Youtube suddenly suspended Sky News Australia. Why now?

https://www.fda.gov/media/89036/download

Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products
Guidance for Industry

No pretending they didn’t know, this paper is six years old.

I’ve yet to see any proven limit to the shedding. Rumour has it they may stop after 2-4 weeks post each injection but this is unlikely. We know people have been producing spikes some 5 months later, so I’d wager eternal production that tapers off. This could be a straight AIDs.

See sections VI and also page 15.

“Shedding of such products may be intermittent and unpredictable”.

“higher potential for recombination or reversion in the patient, the shedding pattern and/or what is shed may change”

They’re supposed to already know, among other things:

“The duration of shedding, including the first and last day of shedding, and the peak period(s)”

Page 16 notes they need to study:

“• Whether the shed product was determined to be infectious.”

Watch the cop out:

“Because transmission to untreated individuals is an extremely low probability event,”

that is opinion, not fact

the point of science is checking

“monitoring such individuals for transmission is usually not required during the clinical

development of a product. However, if there is a potential for transmission, additional”

like a gain of function spike? That potential?

“data will be needed to assess that possibility; in which case, we recommend that sponsors

consult with OCTGT in connection with developing a monitoring plan.”

Monitoring. Not stopping. That’s it. And it’s probably why some of them were given placebo and saline. The shedding group?

First autopsy of a jabbed corpse

Almost every organ had high levels, almost. Almost total infestation. Almost like someone injected it!

Boosters push and more explained at bottom.

“The first-ever postmortem study of a patient vaccinated against COVID-19 has revealed that viral RNA was found in every organ of the patient’s body, meaning that the vaccine is either ineffective or the coronavirus actually spreads faster in vaccinated individuals.”

Both. But more Latter. And more fatal. I already covered the jabbed dead versus normal. Jabbed are literally more likely to die from it. MSM is hiding this and going on about symptoms. Dead people have reduced symptoms, can confirm.

paper here

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/

“A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited. Acute bronchopneumonia and tubular failure were assigned as the cause of death at autopsy;

however, we did not observe any characteristic morphological features of COVID-19.

Postmortem molecular mapping by real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed relevant SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb. These results might suggest that the first vaccination induces immunogenicity but not sterile immunity.”

So to save 86 year-olds, for like, six months, we need to damage all young adults and children? Fucking locusts. Are the Bad Boomers in power pushing this a Biblical plague? Maybe the jab itself is more Boomer Doomer than the wild virus.

It makes sense the liver would be clear because the liver’s function is clearing that shit but finding it in the heart? Goner. Dead man walking. Kidney? Suggests liver moved it there. Cerebrum? Yep, zombie.

Maybe the liver pushed it out of the liver, and back into the bloodstream, infecting the brain?
Old people and some heavily disease-burdened (like STDs) have thin blood brain barrier.

Definition:

The cerebrum or telencephalon is the largest part of the brain containing the cerebral cortex, as well as several subcortical structures, including the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and olfactory bulb. In the human brain, the cerebrum is the uppermost region of the central nervous system.Wikipedia

Brain damage.

All we need is psychosis and they’re literal zombies. Maybe the psychotic break happens later, once it’s really stewed in the brain juices for a while. It’s written off as dementia in old people so may already be happening. Maybe they get a form of terminal agitation in addition. I do actually know my stuff. When it’s in the basal ganglia you are absolutely screwed. That’s motor control. It’s in the hippocampus possibly explaining the terminally stupid decision to get a second one. It’s damaging memory then, which suggests senility symptoms oncoming. I wonder if it’s more likely to kill small or large amygdala people faster. Likely smaller.

What is the overall effect of this death stick? Advanced cellular senescence? Meaning the average age of death would be those with least lifespan left, presently seen, but that will just keep getting younger and younger and younger. Logan’s Run modRNA mod? So a basic model we assume their remainder lifespan is cut in half.
Does this help pension plans and national debt?
Well assuming 80 is lifespan (slightly shorter in men, who are dying faster from this…)
then a 60yo would die at 70,
a 50yo would die at 65,
a 40yo at 60,
a 30yo at 55,
a 25yo at ~50.
a 20yo at <50,
a 10yo at 45
a 5yo at 40 … etc. Down to school age.

Nobody would die before 35 except anomalies. Do we see this? Why try to deny those unless pattern?

Anomalous deaths would be acute advanced senescence. Intention may be largely chronic.
They can blame global warming.

So, yes. That’s very neat. A lot of younger fertile people getting it would die around menopause/manopause. Hence, perfect economic efficiency is achieved. The aging (genetic void) population dies off as soon as reproduction is achieved. We’d need at least ten years to see if average lifespan has gone down (80 to 70). Assuming this simple model. Younger Boomers and Gen Xers are the ones to watch. A reversal of lifespan is unprecedented. This is the slowest kill model and explains the push until 2023*. We’ll begin to notice by then en masse. This is why new techs need a decade PLUS of human trials. They look at lifespan.

*MPs love the book Nudge.
Has the NHS guaranteed treatment for genomic ‘vaccine’ damage? No. Nobody is talking about this.
Experimental subjects are considered consenting adults, so may not be eligible for NHS treatment.

Add in a sterilising effect especially in men, STD transmission, and the guidestones would be about right.

If that basic of the most basic models is correct, then the kids currently injected will die shortly after their feckless parentals.
Remember, saving the NHS also means fewer old people burdening it like lampreys. They could come out later and thank you for your willing participation, since you did technically save the NHS – by dying younger.
Experiments are permitted to legally deceive you, so long as they debrief you. In 2023.

By accelerating aging population, that’s very eugenic technically but deeply wrong re family. Surplus of orphans. Pedo paradise. Adult IQ would be higher (and GDP shoot up) since the morons would’ve happily skipped along for the euthanasia, children in tow.

The average age is 80-something now because they have no remainder, so it becomes weeks, not years. It fits.

And there’s no known time limit on shedding those synthetic SPs, secondhand smoke-like. At a certain uptake, society may be fumigating itself. Birth rates already have tanked. We may need a leper colony. They could be lifelong biohazards. They could easily test their exhalation at different points post-experimental injections. PE majors have a tube you breathe into, they could easily do it. The fact they don’t means they know the result would make them hated. Could be like the Island 2005 film.

Meanwhile

The basal ganglia are a group of subcortical nuclei, meaning groups of neurons that lie below the cerebral cortex. The basal ganglia is comprised of the striatum, which consists of the caudate nucleus and the putamen, the globus pallidus, the subthalamic nucleus, and the substantia nigra The basal ganglia are primarily associated with motor control, since motor disorders, such as Parkinson’s or Huntington’s diseases stem from dysfunction of neurons within the basal ganglia. For voluntary motor behavior, the basal ganglia are involved in the initiation or suppression of behavior and can regulate movement through modulating activity in the thalamus and cortex. In addition to motor control, the basal ganglia also communicate with non-motor regions of the cerebral cortex and play a role in other behaviors such as emotional and cognitive processing.

If it retarded them, I doubt any of us would notice.

An earlier coronavirus vaccine paper: why boosters and well, all of this really

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14676007/

Vaccines against infectious bronchitis of chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) have arguably been the most successful, and certainly the most widely used, of vaccines for diseases caused by coronaviruses, the others being against bovine, canine, feline and porcine coronaviruses. Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), together with the genetically related coronaviruses of turkey (Meleagris gallopovo) and ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), is a group 3 coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus being tentatively in group 4, the other known mammalian coronaviruses being in groups 1 and 2. IBV replicates not only in respiratory tissues (including the nose, trachea, lungs and airsacs, causing respiratory disease), but also in the kidney (associated with minor or major nephritis), oviduct, and in many parts of the alimentary tract–the oesophagus, proventriculus, duodenum, jejunum, bursa of Fabricius, caecal tonsils (near the distal end of the tract), rectum and cloaca (the common opening for release of eggs and faeces), usually without clinical effects. The virus can persist, being re-excreted at the onset of egg laying (4 to 5 months of age), believed to be a consequence of the stress of coming into lay. Genetic lines of chickens differ in the extent to which IBV causes mortality in chicks, and in respect of clearance of the virus after the acute phase. Live attenuated (by passage in chicken embryonated eggs) IBV strains were introduced as vaccines in the 1950s, followed a couple of decades later by inactivated vaccines for boosting protection in egg-laying birds. Live vaccines are usually applied to meat-type chickens at 1 day of age. In experimental situations this can result in sterile immunity when challenged by virulent homologous virus. Although 100% of chickens may be protected (against clinical signs and loss of ciliary activity in trachea), sometimes 10% of vaccinated chicks do not respond with a protective immune response. Protection is short lived, the start of the decline being apparent 9 weeks after vaccination with vaccines based on highly attenuated strains. IBV exists as scores of serotypes (defined by the neutralization test), cross-protection often being poor. Consequently, chickens may be re-vaccinated, with the same or another serotype, two or three weeks later. Single applications of inactivated virus has generally led to protection of <50% of chickens. Two applications have led to 90 to 100% protection in some reports, but remaining below 50% in others. In practice in the field, inactivated vaccines are used in laying birds that have previously been primed with two or three live attenuated virus vaccinations. This increases protection of the laying birds against egg production losses and induces a sustained level of serum antibody, which is passed to progeny. The large spike glycoprotein (S) comprises a carboxy-terminal S2 subunit (approximately 625 amino acid residues), which anchors S in the virus envelope, and an amino-terminal S1 subunit (approximately 520 residues), believed to largely form the distal bulbous part of S. The S1 subunit (purified from IBV virus, expressed using baculovirus or expressed in birds from a fowlpoxvirus vector) induced virus neutralizing antibody. Although protective immune responses were induced, multiple inoculations were required and the percentage of protected chickens was too low (<50%) for commercial application. Remarkably, expression of S1 in birds using a non-pathogenic fowl adenovirus vector induced protection in 90% and 100% of chickens in two experiments. Differences of as little as 5% between the S1 sequences can result in poor cross-protection. Differences in S1 of 2 to 3% (10 to 15 amino acids) can change serotype, suggesting that a small number of epitopes are immunodominant with respect to neutralizing antibody. Initial studies of the role of the IBV nucleocapsid protein (N) in immunity suggested that immunization with bacterially expressed N, while not inducing protection directly, improved the induction of protection by a subsequent inoculation with inactivated IBV. In another study, two intramuscular immunizations of a plasmid expressing N induced protective immunity. The basis of immunity to IBV is not well understood.

Serum antibody levels do not correlate with protection, although local antibody is believed to play a role.

Adoptive transfer of IBV-infection-induced alphabeta T cells bearing CD8 antigen protected chicks from challenge infection. In conclusion, live attenuated IBV vaccines induce good, although shortlived, protection against homologous challenge, although a minority of individuals may respond poorly. Inactivated IBV vaccines are insufficiently efficacious when applied only once and in the absence of priming by live vaccine. Two applications of inactivated IBV are much more efficacious, although this is not a commercially viable proposition in the poultry industry.

However, the cost and logistics of multiple application of a SARS inactivated vaccine would be more acceptable for the protection of human populations, especially if limited to targeted groups (e.g. health care workers and high-risk contacts). Application of a SARS vaccine is perhaps best limited to a minimal number of targeted individuals who can be monitored, as some vaccinated persons might, if infected by SARS coronavirus, become asymptomatic excretors of virus, thereby posing a risk to non-vaccinated people.

Looking further into the future, the high efficacy of the fowl adenovirus vector expressing the IBV S1 subunit provides optimism for a live SARS vaccine, if that were deemed to be necessary, with the possibility of including the N protein gene.

Flu vaccinated shed 6.3x more flu breathing – CDC study

CDC Funded Study Shows the Vaccinated Shed 6.3 Times More Flu Virus, Just by Breathing

Relevant.

https://www.pnas.org/content/115/5/1081

Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.

“The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”

Doc:

“Prior immunity” promotes lung inflammation… Now I wanted to explain this part so that people wouldn’t be misled. Immunity and vaccination are not synonymous, in fact, this study provides the very evidence to prove that vaccinations like the influenza vaccine don’t provide immunity,

herd immunity is also a myth (search bar it)

hence the vaccinated being infected and spread it more. The correct wording should have read that “prior VACCINATIONS promote lung inflammation” as this fact has been shown in animal studies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24033080

This means that when you receive a flu vaccine, elucidated by this study and animal studies, the lungs are damaged. Hence the scientific term/phrase “vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease” which in animal studies

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879807

has shown that flu vaccinations damage lung tissue of the vaccinated and distort or weaken the natural immunity of the host, person or animal. Could this be just one more reason more people are developing severe lung diseases like COPD or why the rates of asthma in America are increasing in the vaccinated?

The short and simple: The research shows…

  1. The vaccine doesn’t protect one from infection. 
  2. That the vaccinated are “shedding”/spreading more virus simply by breathing.
  3. That prior vaccination has weakened the immune systems of those who got the shot.
  4. Individuals who receive the flu vaccine are placing others around them at greater risk than the unvaccinated.

read his whole post

Fully vaccinated CAN live shed and start outbreak

From the memoryhole, never let them forget.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/04/measles-outbreak-traced-fully-vaccinated-patient-first-time

I believe that’s called a precedent?

Get the measles vaccine, and you won’t get the measles—or give it to anyone else. Right? Well, not always. A person fully vaccinated against measles has contracted the disease and passed it on to others. The startling case study contradicts received wisdom about the vaccine and suggests that a recent swell of measles outbreaks in developed nations could mean more illnesses even among the vaccinated.

more illnesses even among the vaccinated.

if ‘wisdom’ means marketing lies

When it comes to the measles vaccine, two shots are better than one. Most people in the United States are initially vaccinated against the virus shortly after their first birthday and return for a booster shot as a toddler. Less than 1% of people who get both shots will contract the potentially lethal skin and respiratory infection.

A cold is potentially lethal.

Water is potentially lethal.

Oxygen is potentially lethal.

And even if a fully vaccinated person does become infected—a rare situation known as “vaccine failure”—they weren’t thought to be contagious.

Rare? No?

y lie

That’s why a fully vaccinated 22-year-old theater employee in New York City who developed the measles in 2011 was released without hospitalization or quarantine. But like Typhoid Mary, this patient turned out to be unwittingly contagious. Ultimately, she transmitted the measles to four other people, according to a recent report in Clinical Infectious Diseases that tracked symptoms in the 88 people with whom “Measles Mary” interacted while she was sick. Surprisingly, two of the secondary patients had been fully vaccinated. And although the other two had no record of receiving the vaccine, they both showed signs of previous measles exposure that should have conferred immunity.

“should”

paper here

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105

if only we could sue the companies, right?

A closer look at the blood samples taken during her treatment revealed how the immune defenses of Measles Mary broke down.

victim blaming

As a first line of defense against the measles and other microbes, humans rely on a natural buttress of IgM antibodies. Like a wooden shield, they offer some protection from microbial assaults but aren’t impenetrable. The vaccine (or a case of the measles) prompts the body to supplement this primary buffer with a stronger armor of IgG antibodies, some of which are able to neutralize the measles virus so it can’t invade cells or spread to other patients. This secondary immune response was presumed to last for decades.

Also a lie.

By analyzing her blood, the researchers found that Measles Mary mounted an IgM defense, as if she had never been vaccinated. Her blood also contained a potent arsenal of IgG antibodies, but a closer look revealed that none of these IgG antibodies were actually capable of neutralizing the measles virus. It seemed that her vaccine-given immunity had waned.

so…, antibody impotence?

assuming she ever had immunity

you just said “vaccine failure”, which means she was NEVER immune, despite being exposed to the vaccine

Although public health officials have assumed that measles immunity lasts forever, the case of Measles Mary highlights the reality that “the actual duration [of immunity] following infection or vaccination is unclear,” says Jennifer Rosen, who led the investigation as director of epidemiology and surveillance at the New York City Bureau of Immunization. The possibility of waning immunity is particularly worrisome as the virus surfaces in major U.S. hubs like BostonSeattle, New York, and the Los Angeles area. Rosen doesn’t believe this single case merits a change in vaccination strategy—for example, giving adults booster shots—but she says that more regular surveillance to assess the strength of people’s measles immunity is warranted.

there are millions of diseases

no

If it turns out that vaccinated people lose their immunity as they get older, that could leave them vulnerable to measles outbreaks seeded by unvaccinated people

but this case literally proves a fully “protected” person can CAUSE it

and if you ask about most outbreaks, “which % of that case group were already vaccinated for it?” they get angry and defensive and usually refuse to answer you

and the MSM doesn’t report it either… huh

which are increasingly common in the United States and other developed countries. Even a vaccine failure rate of 3% to 5% could devastate a high school with a few thousand students, says Robert Jacobson, director of clinical studies for the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group in Rochester, Minnesota, who wasn’t involved with the study. Still, he says, “The most important ‘vaccine failure’ with measles happens when people refuse the vaccine in the first place.”