I assume you know r/K, here is a paper direct from the source on the latter.
You’re smart enough to draw the connection here.
Promiscuity is bad for males.
GTFO, haters. Either swallow the redpill data or quit pretending to care about the truth.
Also, evobio arguments about fertilization don’t apply to sterile sex.
For the same reason a man’s opinion on periods is baseless, they aren’t really having it.
DAT Table 7.1
This was used as a harsh incentive back home for rationing. I doubt this would work nowadays, what with obesity and the expectation of super portions.
However, holding aloft the old war dead is no excuse for the effete Modern Man to sneer at Modern Women. You haven’t done your bit either. That’s the point of propaganda, an antidote to laziness.
I know few men who’d even give up bacon for their freedom.
Once a cheat, always a cheat = If someone makes that choice once, they’ll make it again.
Behavioural genetics is confirming what the traditionalists already knew.
As for the neurochemistry of vasopressin, low levels of any count as pathological (see depression, OCD etc).
If the K-types wanted a surer mating game in future, a simple genetics test to distinguish the short allele (K-selected, monogamous) types from the deceptive hedons with a long-form allele (r-selected, high infidelity risk) would cut the latter off at the heels. It isn’t an excuse, but again, if they make that choice once, they’re tainted and should be divorced.
Imagine short-listing the prospects for your daughter’s hand, and your grandchildren’s genetics, based on this, oh the wonders of technology! Simply cutting them out from social circles would be a genetic death. Why do you think slutty people congregate in urban areas, where nobody knows them and they’d have to be dismal to build a reputation among their own? Why do you think we collect alcoholism, drug and sexual information as a bundle?
This isn’t just a marital issue, it covers social deception, this is just one sexual application of it i.e. K-selected males would be unwise to accept an r-male into their group, because he’ll screw you over metaphorically. And you shouldn’t leave him with a free house (some stay-at-home fathers) because he’ll invite over your wife too.
Most sperm are destroyed by white blood cells. However, here’s a horrifying fact about where it can escape;
“Once sperm cells reach the end of the oviducts they are free to swim out of the end of the tube and into the body cavity, where they are eventually destroyed. So many women walking around today will have sperm cells swimming around the interstitial fluid that surrounds their body organs. The female reproductive tract does not finish in a dead end.”
Let alone a happy one.
And they expect the rest of us to convince them to leap in the gene pool?
Who wants them there? They’re like a vegan at a steakhouse.
They’re like the new vegans. Rant rant rant rant rant – to the omnivores. They bore one another so must seek out the rest of us. I’ve even heard them try to argue against the Bible, because it tells you to marry repeatedly, but with God…
“Perfect love casteth out all fear.”—1 John 4:18
As I noted briefly in Who do these guys think they are? there has been a new trend to start randomly pontificating at women on traditional matters by wholly modern men with no moral authority. An egregious example of this are the basement-dwelling losers with MGTOW somewhere in their screen-name who go on female issue websites and start bitching about us, to us, for attention. They aren’t even trolling, they’re probably retarded.
It’s quite literally mansplaining, quite by accident. A genetic suicide has no valid opinions on childrearing, male or female. Imagine if I kept blogging about how great it is to be a man, that isn’t even an opinion, it’s a delusion. A vegan has no valid opinions on the preparation of Thanksgiving turkey. It isn’t that they don’t have the right to an opinion, theoretically, but the basic conditions of merely having an opinion do not hold. They have no skin in the game. I don’t mind if they go off to their precious male-only spaces, please do go. But this new barrage of intrusion to the exact group (traditional women) you’re whining doesn’t exist? It makes all men look bad.
Nobody is going to tell people so actively hostile to a stable base to have kids. Even people on the fence with that stuff shouldn’t have kids. It’s the biggest of responsibilities. You can’t half-arse it. You need to go in expecting to do half the work, because there’ll be a lot more than you could ever expect, that’s called ‘parental investment’. Nobody is oppressing you, it’s the hardest job and has been for all time, whatever your sex. You’re never off the clock once you become a parent. It’s a 20 year to life investment, like a prison term, but these guys would balk at signing a two year employment contract. They are literally afraid of commitment, whatever the context. If you aren’t mature enough for that, fine, at least be mature enough not to brag about how childish you still are.
Here’s the inner monologue of everyone who hears these people;
You don’t want kids? Why should I care?
I am entirely neutral on this piece of information.
You’re never having kids? Thank God.
The two main groups, the no-life teenage losers and on the shelf Boomers, feed one another in their hatred like a human centipede of misogynist shit (you know they think men are blameless innocent little victims on a pedestal for every count) and they wonder why they put off any sane women, to the extent they say there are no good women – sound familiar?
Bitterness is never attractive. The system isn’t against them, they could theoretically have a nuclear family. They don’t want to put in any work. They dream that a Patriarchy would just hand them a wife with no effort, like a slave driver. Since they cannot get a woman by persuasion. It’s Affirmative Action for boys who refuse to become men. Never in human history has marriage worked like that, the family unit cannot excel while one party is a user, what all abusers have in common. It’s an r-type scam, they cannot compete reproductively, so they’re trying to convince other men to simply give up. They’re jealous of Patriarchs. The future belongs to those who show up for it and that requires…?
All this complaining is convincing themselves that they don’t need to put in the work, because their dream is impossible.
Imagine a scrawny pajama boy bitching on a weightlifting forum about how weightlifting doesn’t work. You’d wanna wring the little bitch’s neck too.
A couple of choice examples I have read.
“Give a benefit of marriage/ traditionalism that I don’t have already then I will consider it”
This isn’t a business transaction. There aren’t spreadsheets to look over. Aspies are already at high odds of dying alone because they seem to think it’s a contract for their soul. There isn’t any guarantee in human relationships, in ties to people. Why are we wasting time listening to these losers when they can’t keep a girlfriend more than a matter of months? Why do you think women ask how long your longest relationship was? It’s to see if your pair bonding ability is broken.
“MGTOW is the new way.”
Cult alert. Cult alert. Cult alert.
If you go into a marriage cold, you deserve to get divorced.
If you think it’s you vs. them, it’s over. It’s dead. It was never a true bond. Monogamy is pair bonding. If you can’t pair bond, you are incapable of being monogamous. If you can’t pair bond with your chosen spouse, you are incapable of a marriage with them.
They don’t even like the idea of being loyal within a marriage, as if that isn’t the entire point. Their imaginary Ideal isn’t even good enough not to cheat on…
If you can’t trust the person you’re marrying, or trust any member of the opposite sex, you are barred from marriage. Oh, you might have the paperwork, for a wedding, but you don’t have a marriage. That takes work and dedication. If you’re busy thinking of the end before you have a beginning, if you go in without the love, the fault lies with you.
If you allow the failures of your sex to turn you bitter and cynical and jaded, you are no better than the lowliest feminist.
If you spend all your time telling people how much you don’t care about something, you may as well be a goth. At least they’re honest about it.
If you give up on women, that means you give up on talking to women online or discussing women’s issues online.
After all, it isn’t your problem, is it?
I think we have a decent test for fake MGTOW in that.
There is no reason that this psychological urge to import dangerous foreigners could be advantageous in a state of nature, unless there is a second act in which the r-strategist’s competition pays some price that the r-strategist can avoid. That price comes in the civil war this will eventually produce, which the r-strategist will hide from. Marines, soldiers, cops, and K-strategist citizens will all be killed by the thousands. Imagine you are an alien observing Woody Allen as he imports these foreigners pre 9/11, and then watches as the firefighters and cops run into the Twin Towers. Woody Allen is navel lint compared to a firefighter or cop, but all of a sudden all the firefighters and cops are dead, Woody Allen is all that is left, and his genes move forward – and he doesn’t even need to marry a stepdaughter.
This is instinctual, treasonous, and evil, all wrapped into one. It is amazing to me that in the throes of r-selection, our kind is almost totally blind to the rabbits executing this plan right under our noses. How many good men need to die, before we recognize this for what it is?
I’ve been saying this for a while, I’m flattered he agrees.
It’s treason, they are inviting local terrorism and death. Here in the UK, Tony Blair revoked the death penalty for treason – right before going to war with Iraq. They know exactly what they’re doing, so when this happens.
There will definitely be a backlash. The question is will the rabbits switch to the K-side, and claim to have learned their lesson.
When the time comes, focus on the cause (who made this happen), over the symptom (obvious red herring) if there is a choice.
Ask: Who did this to you?
Our response to the various excuses should be apathy.