White rape gangs

Before any spoiled little shit tries to change the subject, when men are raped they can’t get pregnant or endure fatal physical damage (especially virgin females) so yes, it is completely different and shame on you for equating the biology for virtue signalling points.

It’s a false equivalence. The area the sexes hugely differ is the reproductive systems.

At the very least, women have more nerves to damage.

Women and children are permanently vulnerable so no, it isn’t all about men. Stop waving around your man card for five fucking minutes. This is about civilization. There should be an expectation of safety or why bother?

The statistics are very clear and rape shouldn’t exist for anyone, ideally. However, most rapists, regardless of target, are male and this is indisputable. That is your red suppository.

Ah, but the snowflakes who try to refocus any attention on them like a sweet 16 TV star don’t want to admit that women are vulnerable, because then men have to be responsible for their own feels. The Bible is very clear that your own lust is yours to control. Pluck out thine eyes than sin with them. Unless you can seriously claim you’re holier than God, fuck off with your victim blaming and blame the biggest claimed victim, yourself.

What do you really expect? The public space to be a sexual trigger-free safe space like some low IQ shithole? Why not live there? Ah, but it’s about happiness isn’t it? Other people’s natural erotic capital makes you feel insecure. If you can’t be attractive, you’ll ask every attractive person to cover up because Harrison Bergeron was the fucking documentary prequel to Idiocracy. It’s impossible and ridiculous to presume a standard for the West we never needed. Men are turned on by fantasy, how do we ban that? Is staring outlawed? The sadism of restricting normal healthy First World expressions is insane. Where is the line? Kids can’t be topless on beaches too?

Pedophiles exist. Gay men too so men gotta wear niqabs too. For a pervert atheist’s definition of “modesty”, no shoes, no cars, no toasters… people want to fuck all of those. It isn’t about the sexual object, its own feelings don’t matter. It’s all about the long suffering deviant who “can’t help it”, infantilization like that reduces their legal responsibility, somehow (fact: only if you’re retarded). And instead of inventing some etiquette when we’re in dire need of exactly that we’re going to blame the world for stimulating them with photons.

Sure, if I robbed a bank I “can’t help it” because I like money, right? Like that?
I am attracted to money, no word of a lie so I can roll around naked on it like a sexy Godfather. Money swimming because moon bathing is for hippies and witches.

Children get away with things because compared to an adult their growth is retarded. They literally don’t have as much impulse control as an adult but studies show everyone can learn! Even the thick! I bet you’re glad you have no excuse now, huh?

No?

You all argue in bad faith. It isn’t about goodness, it’s about you feeling good about yourself.

The SJWs have fat acceptance, the MGTOW have ugly appreciation. Anyone not naturally ugly must be covered in shame, because beauty isn’t divine or ordained to be enjoyed by god as part of nature! These people don’t believe in beauty (their ego cannot “tolerate” it) but they’ll gnaw your ear off with a false teleology of evolution (I read the book, it isn’t in there) where ugly psychopathic weaklings are the Ubermensch because they’re “man” enough to rape.

Bear in mind, Western culture = Western aesthetic expression.
If you aren’t free to express, culture is dead. Muslims are getting skirts banned in schools. That’s your team. That is your stated side of history. If you look in the real legal history of the West, sumptuary laws never ever worked. Lower hemlines solve nothing. And that was class appropriation. Men loved crossdressing for millennia before women! If women had to dress like men, only men would complain! We like being warm in winter! Men lose out on the opportunity to assess a future spouse’s genetic fitness based on physique. Hope you like a lemon. If every woman must cover up, every woman is tacitly informed to let themselves go, since they can’t display their value for a potential mate or social value among other women. Hence, the fat acceptance win.

Look how many women in niqabs are obese compared to hijabs. Modest, huh?

The corset was a response to Victorian obesity. Shameful fat is modern. The only permanently skinny people in the olden days were the starving poor, everyone else fluctuated because seasons exist and central heating didn’t.

Henry VIII wore the equivalent of a bandage dress on his obesity and not one of you fat-shamers say a thing about it!

People get murdered for no reason. Rape is the same, you don’t have to “do” anything, that’s a Just World fallacy. Predators randomly attack. Unless you want to bring back either castration or hanging to limit that ability, you don’t get to bitch that the victims were “asking for it” but only if female. That is sadistic and vengeful, respectively.

Society is about a realistic appraisal of how shitty humans are and shaming it. If shaming rapists makes you feel personally attacked then fine. Get a therapist.

Everybody hates these guys because they do nothing of their own volition; it’s spiteful, reactive, insecure whining when they feel someone, somewhere, might make them question their beliefs or feel bad in empathy for three seconds. That must hurt. They never start charities, host their own platforms and debates, no lobbying, God forbid! Nothing with effort. They use the rape of others as a verbal battering ram to protect their grandiose ego and it’s sickening to anyone with a conscience.

Off-topic: Making a joke about rape isn’t the same as threatening rape and the joke is still in poor taste if you phrase it poorly. Getting offended someone didn’t laugh at your joke is pathetic, finding rape horrific is not.

You want a virtue signal? I was here for years before you and caught shit from feminists for having a male rape tag and also talking about child grooming, kidnapping, rape gangs. I refused to pretend it was just little girls too and have firsthand experience with victims to know, how many of you can say that? People somewhat believed little boys were a possibility but struggle to believe to this day that adults can be taken in too. “Trafficking” is the media term, its real name is Modern Slavery. You believe any anecdote a man writes and disbelieve any female, that’s called misogyny. Even the Muslims aren’t that bad. SJWs do the opposite, believing any woman and mocking any man in pain, they are also evil cunts. It’s hypocritical evil and it’s still evil and you can’t make me say it’s not. Now the MRA assholes stream in to tell me I’m an SJW because I believe virginity is real (they don’t) and only women can get pregnant (they don’t).

I’m neither! Neither of you assholes can label me in the other camp. It’s being normal.

Some of us can see over our identity to the issues!

I’ve been targeted by everyone! They all think I’m the other guy!

It is possible to care about ALL rape victims at the same time, while acknowledging that for medical reasons, there are differences! This is the one crime where you cannot ignore anatomy! Sorry bro??!

Update: I’ll put this here, whatever.

And the #MeToo thing helped open up a national conversation here to the abuse of largely boys in boarding schools, until you morons shut it down by taking the piss (even out of male victims, brave) and now it’s all been covered up again. It might be impossible now to retread that ground, the old ones are dying off. Congratulations, you’ve personally helped defend pedophile rings. They were being exposed and you stopped it for feels. Thanks for spoiling my plan, fuckheads. It’s called the Overton Window.

Now everyone’s gone back to making insulting films about their privilege.
I’d rather not be raped far from home as a child, thanks. Boarding School Syndrome might go aways to explaining all the cucks. The parents to this day don’t want their child blamed for or suspected of seducing the adult, male teacher.
There is your toxic masculinity.

Did I mention there is no legal obligation to report child rape? Even the schools don’t need to tell the State (that will do nothing).
And the age of consent helps this along, to continue to exist? The consent that was Victorian, provisional (intended to rise with biological information we now have to make majority 18, majority was de facto 16 then for the military) and intended to prevent child rape and prostitution?

Dragging pedophiles and rapists into broad daylight shouldn’t frighten you.

Our time period in history will likely be called Pedophile’s Paradise.

They tried to take MeToo and re-shape it because it was working.
It proved they don’t own the internet. It’s the only place to change hearts. Most people don’t have minds.

Or would it make more sense if I titled this with brackets?

Idiots. There was no Plan B and they knew it. For a split second, their media hold was dead. And some of the swarthier among you had to pretend rape doesn’t happen to women…. really? Castrate yourself, you don’t deserve that dick.

The people doing the rape might be white but what about the people protecting them from justice?

Idiots can’t see logically how their actions bring about chaos. They misunderstand the situation and fuck it up for the smart ones who planned it.

Why did Hollywood suddenly go quiet on the Marxist support during that whole thing, no politics? Didn’t you notice? Hope and tacit support. They wanted to see who won before coming out. You shot us. I’m still pissed. The children suffer the most. Thanks, defend the guy with a rape button under his desk! Penis mafia! Traitor.

Spot the difference.

Stick a great big swinging dick on it. That would be honest about your priorities: Muh Dick.

They let you win – for them. You were anti-white, so you won. Who’s the SJW here?

If your workplace forces you to concede orgies are morally okay and you probably secretly wanted to be raped by your boss, anything you say about those people will be used to paint you as crazy or the real rapist here. Unless society’s standards change (denial stops) and all these people are brought to light. A spotlight.

Awkwardness is the entire point.

You might notice Denial Stops as the mantra of the red pill. Idiots.

The only way to defeat a victim culture is with real victims.

Even the white predators target whites. Those are also not okay.

You wouldn’t get over yourself so you played yourself.

Porn ruins real sex lives

http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/how-internet-porn-is-changing-how-men-and-women-are-having-sex
That’s the point, then you consume more.
And not just porn.
This used to be called corruption of the young. Their brains are plastic. Socrates deserved it.
Porn, as a supernormal stimulus, affects adults too.
To clarify a previous comment, there is no such thing as a boyfriend or girlfriend and the connection is a nonsense claim. It’s friends with benefits, the clue is in the name. Legally it means nothing. It isn’t traditional either, more like a prostitute in an apartment arrangement, where you pay via utilities and groceries. Those are historical and just another form of hooker. The 19th century in London saw many, an invisible kind of prostitution, as people were forced to cram houses anyway.
Hook-up culture has been designed to alienate men with subpar experiences and in turn put off women since the men don’t want them, so you might as well work overtime.
Porn actors are actors, it isn’t real at all. It’s like basing your knowledge of language on the bursting into song part of
musical numbers. People should be embarrassed to watch it as a puppet show because that’s essentially what it is, a fuck-puppet show.
Without masturbation, how many societal ills would disappear?
In the case of women, would menarche and visible sexualisation of puberty occur later, as it always did in the past? Would men evolve past pajama boy phases with the incentive of more testosterone in their system on a daily basis?
Frigidity, which I mentioned before, is simply an attempt to pathologise a natural female disinterest in sex. There is no such thing as female impotence, because a woman’s completion of the response cycle isn’t required for conception. From this study, we are not shocked to find married women (with the most security and emotional connection, female desires) have the best sex life and as known previously, married people have more sex overall, but it’s surprising to some that men don’t like this free-for-all too. The buffet doesn’t satisfy, it feels cheap because they don’t breed, that is the original fulfillment of the process – the fruit of their loins. Sterile sex appears to be disenchanting men with the whole practice and putting them off the investment for other, deeper kinds. Have you seen a Muslim man unhappy with his sex life? How about a Catholic, the real kind with no contraception?
TLDR: pair bonding is necessary for good sex. Like I said before, if you can’t enjoy vanilla, well, you don’t like ice cream.
The boring people are the ones constantly chasing new things like a dog at a car. That isn’t appreciation, novelty-seeking is too shallow, if anything it’s a form of gluttony, that doesn’t sense the things it takes in.
The Pill probably doesn’t help the female psyche either. Pregnant women are too grumpy to appreciate sex.
An all-male study on male appreciation that they can’t fake would be useful. Sexual satisfaction studies already exist but controls are needed. What are you afraid of finding?
The references in this are interesting. Description bar.

e.g. Endocrine response to masturbation-induced orgasm in healthy men following a 3-week sexual abstinence.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788
In the UK, PornHub was the 35th most visited website for children ages 6 to 14 in 2013.
Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report (2014, October) (p. 232). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use- attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf.

We wuz warned.

http://biblehub.com/mark/9-43.htm

jesus lust porn lechery

And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, line 47.

http://biblehub.com/mark/9-50.htm

“Salt is good, but if it loses its saltiness, how can you make it salty again? Have salt among yourselves, and be at peace with each other.”

Ah, men.

Is any of this extreme? No, it used to be common sense. As in, most common book in existence?

http://biblehub.com/matthew/10-34.htm

Can’t stop logic, it always breaks in eventually.

http://biblehub.com/matthew/10-26.htm

Stefan’s right, sunlight is the best disinfectant.

http://biblehub.com/matthew/13-12.htm

For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.

^ also applies to faith, it’s a cycle of being good, receiving good

http://biblehub.com/matthew/12-33.htm

Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad, for the tree is known by its fruit.

You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. [virtue signalling is false piety]

The good person out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil.

I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak,

for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

http://biblehub.com/psalms/58-10.htm

The righteous will rejoice when he sees the vengeance; he will bathe his feet in the blood of the wicked.

Read Candide.
It blew the whistle on moral decay precipitating the decline.
Long before Galt, cultivate your garden, folks.

Aquinas on Mohammed and Islam

Weakness, decadence, high time preference.

https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/resources/forgotten-truths/what-saint-thomas-aquinas-says-about-mohammed-and-islam

It justifies their sins of lust and bloodlust.
It’s successful among them because it gives them an excuse for the differences HBD elucidates.

Meanwhile, Christianity isn’t soft.
https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/resources/forgotten-truths/charity-does-not-justify-compromise-1
“holy indignation” nice

Link: The Western Way of love

https://aeon.co/essays/russia-against-the-western-way-of-love

It’s lust or limerence. There is very little love in the West.

They consider people as interchangeable, nobody is special. Decisions are rationalized, they aren’t rational. Having a rotation of people isn’t a choice, it’s an addiction to the thrill of a new prospect. Narcissus going speed dating to get that high of being admired for the first time again and again and again. Using the other person AS a mirror.

This observation from Mann’s novella Death in Venice (1912) encapsulates a great cultural leap that occurred somewhere close to the beginning of the 20th century. Somehow, the Lover pushed the Beloved from the centre of attention.

Atomised units in a swirling cosmos.

The divine, unknowable and unreachable Other is no longer the subject of our love stories. Instead, we are interested in the Self, with all its childhood traumas, erotic dreams and idiosyncrasies. Examining and protecting this fragile Self [DS: ???] by teaching it to pick its affections properly is the main project of the Regime of Choice – a project brought to fruition using a popularised version of psychotherapeutic knowledge.

Navel-gazing bullshit.

Rieff describes him as ‘anti-heroic, shrewd, carefully counting his satisfactions and dissatisfactions, studying unprofitable commitments as the sins most to be avoided’.

That isn’t love, that’s work. Hedonic profit. You can’t be a Scrooge with real love.

The psychological man is a romantic technocrat who believes that the application of the right tools at the right time can straighten out the tangled nature of our emotions.

Men have never been the romantic sex. Their revulsion for courtly love, their open contempt for romance alone (no sex), demonstrates this better than their appeal to their own vanity as if it’s something possessive (henceforth the best Romantic heroes were written by women and popularized by them). To this day, romance is still considered a Female Genre!

Video: R-type philandering scum

The initial tweet about women was true. Men don’t respect a woman’s right to say No. They respect the right of another man (the boyfriend) to say No. And punch them. This illustrates why pick-up is gaining a substantial backlash. We’re sick of it. You wouldn’t solicit hookers in the street the way they do regular women.

Consent is considered the only sexual morality in the postmodern times. Y/N?

No disgust foreseeable.

We can say No. We can say I don’t want to. These scum persist. We can tell them to fuck off, and then they try and gaslight us for causing that response. They don’t see women as fully human. At least with less agency than a man.

The worst part is when they try to call themselves ‘philosophers’ when they’re actually desperate losers pumped full of contempt and rationalizations. Morons fall for it.

This is how they think. They have no standards, there is no quality about them. They are not men, manboys at best, fuckboys and douchebags. Snivelling little cowards who stand for nothing. They are the manwhores and deadbeat dads.

They aren’t even loyal to their fellow men, let alone women. This is why Patriarchs and Patriarchy hate them. This is why cads are driven out of such societies and murdered. Men think it’s men vs. women. It isn’t. It’s r/K.

Listen closely for such honesty and you hear it pop up everywhere,

feminism and the manosphere have made us falsely believe the sexes are opposed, it’s a false flag to cover their sexual strategy of promiscuity

because when conservative men and conservative women aligned, they were unstoppable.

The moral vacuums self-identify;

“R-type scum” lol @ alpha male shaming

As MW says;

I was not shaming alpha males; you have completely re-framed this for your own benefit. If your idea of an “alpha male” is a guy who fucks other men’s women, you belong in the jungle.

oh damn wow ah

Alpha males get and keep the best women.

Except a woman has a right to own herself, surely? A right to turn down any man for any reason, including none (as does a man)? If they respect our ability to say Yes, to consent, as valid, then logically that requires respect of consent to say No. Yet they hold one up and deny the other. Like a brat with a begging bowl following their mother around going please please please until she gives in. It’s pathetic. Being horny isn’t something to be proud of, cut the porn and get a hobby.

‘Notches’ count for nothing in a society of free sex. They are not masculine. They are not even virile. The only reason people used to look up to Zeus sexually, was that he produced a child with every woman he did. Most fertility gods were women. By the same logic, women should sleep around and be hailed for it. Historically, this happened rather often.

An interesting story from around this time is when Severus’ wife, Julia Domna, criticised the sexual morals of the Caledonian women, the wife of Caledonian chief Argentocoxos replied: “We fulfill the demands of nature in a much better way than do you Roman women; for we consort openly with the best men, whereas you let yourselves be debauched in secret by the vilest”

They are trying to use an evolutionary frame to excuse their lack of self control. Chimps have sexual self control. That argument doesn’t work. If you have the legal right to consent, you have the legal ability to decline. As do women. They expect everyone is horny and desperate as they, they are ‘normal’, and that’s how rape happens, with the constant defense “she wanted it”. Does the word No cease to have meaning? They want to sleep with women who tell them No. That makes them scum.

Moral cowardice. A defect of the masculine. They are not men. They are amoral sociopaths, using people. They are complicit and they are responsible for their choices. Bring on the collapse.

They argue from ignorance, if you don’t know the evil details it’s okay!, the sex acts themselves can’t be wrong to them, no sex isn’t a conceivable option to them. Shutting their legs is unthinkable. This is how you discover an r-type. No restraint. No prudence. No consequences. 

It comes down to this —

They have no honour.

They deserve no respect.

They must be shunned or punished.

Why are the traditionalists rejecting Roosh V as a disgusting degenerate?

He wanted to become the MSM face of PUA and he managed it. He doesn’t seem to like what that means – personal criticisms when you make your personal life public business.

Note: I was neutral on the guy until I researched this, because I limited myself to reading his cultural critiques. Now I want to throw up. I have a strong stomach and I feel nauseous typing this up for you all. You have been warned.

Welcome Jury, to the public trial of one Daryush Valizadeh, better known as Roosh V.

Take a good, long look at the defendant.

roosh v Daryush Valizadeh

Drink it in. International playboy. Did he seriously get a nosejob?

He slags off female appearance for a living despite giving no advice in this area to men (as if looks don’t matter – only for men, conveniently!) while simultaneously calling all women superficial and having no advice to give, clearly.

Recently, he’s tried to hop the fence between degenerate r-type and respectable K. Except those pesky K-types won’t let him. He likes to think he would have got away with it too, if it hadn’t been for those darn feminists! Let’s take a look at why he is barred from every group of genuinely traditional people and so must make his own using words he obviously doesn’t understand, from entries he wrote on his public blog (mostly titles, for time) that you may you look up at your leisure and pause to consider what would happen to this male in the Patriarchy he craves.

rooshrespectsnothing

If you’re like us, your reaction to that hard-won proof (I suffered for you, like Jesus) will be a hard redpilling of this Roosh’s true nature, whatever words he calls himself as this farce continues.

In the Patriarchy he desperately desires, he’d be strung up from a lamp-post for defiling somebody’s virgin daughter.

I think of this whenever I see a mob baying for blood online

As people with a conscience, soul and sense of decency, we may only hope the Patriarchy returns and he gets what he wished for. K-shift is coming, degenerates.

One day genetic engineering will prove us victors

Link: Porn is causing the male thirst epidemic

http://www.rooshv.com/the-male-thirst-epidemic-is-primarily-caused-by-porn

When you watch pornography, you are being programmed to strongly desire sex with promiscuous women (i.e. sluts). The hundreds of hours of video porn you have watched in your life has molded your mind to expect fast and easy sex from women who serve no real purpose outside of sex, and has actually primed you to look down on virginal women since they can’t provide you with immediate sexual excitement. This has happened to you without any conscious thought. The repetition of so many hours of watching sluts get fucked in all manner of possibilities has created expectations and beliefs about how sex should be. The fact that you’ve certainly tried a sex move you’ve seen in porn shows that you are learning certain behaviors and beliefs without deliberately using porn as a learning guide.

The more you watch porn, the more it creates the artificial desire to sleep with a trashy and low quality woman, the same type of woman you see in porn.

It’s quite brave to point this out.
The addicts always come out of the woodwork, visible as they are predictable.

Lust is comparable to a fire for good reason – if you keep stocking it with wood (sorry), the flame will rise ever higher.
Testosterone begats testosterone.

I believe it’s also the culprit behind genuine misogyny (all women are whores ~ always a porn addict) and the total loss of etiquette between the sexes (it isn’t just the feminists, catcalling from the imported masses has become incredibly explicit and drags down what’s acceptable because they believe all Western women are the whores they see in porn).