The delusion decoupled from reality is spread by social contagion (fear of non-conforming) and later via mass psychosis and state enforcement (gulag without the building). Asch’s lines and Moscovici’s blue/green study have proven insanity can be verbally transmitted.
“I’m just as British as you are, fellow white.”
“I’m just as womanly as you are, pregnant lady.”
Magical thinking is psychology’s polite term for insanity.
The cases THEMSELVES are propaganda. To make an example of.
If everyone ignored the tranny shit for ONE YEAR, they’d go ape shit. It’s an outcrop of narcissism, cross-dressers and eunuchs existed during the time of Rome.
Autogynephilia is the fetish of a man forcing you to see him dressed as a woman, then later call him one… and later sleep with him. AA for freaks.
More broadly, they either want access to unavailable (in their mind virginal) unwilling women (rapist, sneaky fucker strategy) or they’re gay and want to trap a straight man (the Queen book was linked here years ago) to take his resources without putting in the female side, because they literally can’t (sneaky fucker, r-select theft).
They wanted the rules, they set the rules.
Meanwhile Vox Day continues to enjoy a temporary Quantum Whiteness, depending on his rhetoric.
Like how he claims to be European now, and still Native American. But Magic Dirt is BS.
He’s playing the Plural Pronoun Game.
Who is We?
You claim to be non-White, it’s a category error to speak on behalf of White people and what we ought to do.
You moved from your stated homeland to settle among us, while telling us to kick out the invaders.
He doesn’t want the Universal Suffrage of the West, like many ignoramuses who refuse to study our laws, but chooses to live here.
Doesn’t stop him talking about women either, as if he knows us.
Better than we know ourselves. <creepy gaslighting music plays>
As a <>
(All) <> are
Please stop, if you’re half the IQ you claim.
I refuse to explain the irrationality of sweeping statements. Especially when it involves at least three billion people. The sexes are more alike than the races e.g. siblings versus neighbours. This is common sense.
This is interesting.
You aren’t friends with Whites until you can rib them.
True, but we mustn’t confuse that with genuine insults, backed by malice.
Say from non-whites who constantly start on whites while living under our fluffy safe yoke and insulting our women like we’re American porn stars. For example.
You whine and cry about Christian societies, and yet you kept invading them and trying to live in them despite the fact that you were invading them illegally.
Projection? No… perish the thought.
There is nothing American about them but their paperwork.
What does your paperwork say?
All these people claim to be, like, 150-170 in IQ score.
Does the evidence suggest this?
Linkspam incoming. More rabbits than Watership Down.
Everybody is racist, rejoice! The SJWs have nothing to hang over us right? (Although this explains their rhetorical bizarrely-secular Original Sin argument). Social justice is secular holiness.
Excellent, we can all stop using the word since it means nothing.
“My friend and I didn’t challenge his ‘facts’, but once he left, we reflected that racism could strike even in the most seemingly liberal of spaces.”
Holding all brown people to no human standard compared with whites and expecting them to act like animals; thieving, raping and murdering, isn’t racist? In light of later evidence in this very article, it’s hilarious to pretend he could challenge the facts.
“The researchers measured increased ACC activity in the brains of those viewing painful expressions on the faces
belonging to their own race, but decreased ACC activity when viewing pain in another race, uncovering a racially biased difference in empathetic response to pain in the brain.”
Biology is racist? Wouldn’t that make it… evolved? Biological paradigm, I know, it hurts the head of liberal arts major, but what was the subtitle of Origin of the Species again?
“These results were disturbing [DS: what a scientist], but were they truly due to race alone? Isn’t race just another group that people tend to rally around?”
Nope, dope. Ask forensic anthropologists. They could tell what race you were hundreds of thousands of years from now, dumbo.
“This study suggests that being on a team of people who share your beliefs doesn’t trump the effect of racial bias, at least as measured in the brain by fMRI.”
All the evidence points one way but they continue to swim the opposite. These people are not scientists. Who follow the evidence.
“we bury it deep in the subconscious in layers of denial to protect our social reputation. We might explicitly deny our internal reactions, but implicitly we follow their whispered mandates right down the line.”
Why do they keep using this possession metaphor? With racism as the Devil?
It’s like the witch trials, denial as proof. These people are deranged. Where’s the null hypothesis?
Social suppression is a byproduct of political suppression. People don’t want to ruin their lives over having the wrong
opinion for their time and place, because the so-called liberals don’t really follow Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, that says freedom of opinion is a right. An actual right, not a free stuff goody bag of positive claims.
“At least in this study, black people seem to be more equitable in their evaluation of others’ pain, acting in a more race-neutral manner when unconsciously primed.”
I can explain that. Outsider status. Lower social status. They feel more intensely negative affect. She must know this, but she’s clearly trying to skew it as if black people are superior? Das racism.
“As a black woman…”
Oh here we go. Why am I not surprised she hasn’t seen any of this from a neutral standpoint?
“These stereotypes can be so pervasive that even black people can be affected, showing less empathy for each other that they do for white people.”
Logic has gone on vacation because these people are insufferable idiots.
“The effects can be so pervasive they aren’t limited to adults, and not even to the brain.”
THEN IT ISN’T NURTURE. IS IT.
Sociologist’s fallacy from people who aren’t even sociologists. If you can’t measure it, that doesn’t make it environmental. It makes it measurement error.
Already they want to go in with the brainwashing/social engineering because teachers know better than evolution, right? What could possibly go wrong? It isn’t as if Education majors have practically retarded IQs compared to peers.
“it’s important for us when we think about ways to increase empathy”
See the way they try to rally group support, based on a personal opinion? A baseless one at that? Why should you change it? What arrogance to think you must tamper with evolutionary constructs, how can you know better? Empathy is earned from a sincere connection.
It’s almost as if these people don’t feel true empathy, but an intellectual sympathy compared to the self, like a narcissist. That would explain the socialist cheating in studies, they feel entitled to get one over on the group while mouthing platitudes about unity. Behaviour>Stated Beliefs
‘mortality salience’ points to a selection pressure and natural selection aversion in avoiding death for the insane sake of being nice. Who cares what they think of you, if you’re dead? (And your whole tribe, they forget that. Even chimps are racist -to the outgroup tribes- and commit violent genocide with war, good luck pinning this on ‘culture’.)
How many nice apex predators do you see on the planet…? Might as well search for the Dodo. These people are ill-adapted for any culture not as easy as our present one.
The final paragraph slays me.
“All this means that the average police officer has quite a lot to deal with in terms of preventing racially biased
actions.” No. Their job is law enforcement. Nothing else matters. They are not state entities enforcing state mind control. Nobody has that job. Teachers need to teach the objective curriculum and pass tests, not control their pupil’s opinions and home life (that they have a right to, privacy, according to Article 8). Quit overstepping. Jobsworths like this are tyrants in waiting. Communists called them useful idiots, because they always believed that eventually, they’d be trusted with the reins of power if only they kissed up enough.
As you’d expect from someone with such a low IQ (she can’t use basic logic and fallacies elude her notice), her advice is insipid and irrational. She said earlier that making friends with other races has no effect on the brain’s response set and also self-awareness would kill the evil ghost of racism, when the only conscious control was top-down suppression and overcompensation – that isn’t a natural reaction and cannot replace the instinct for self-preservation. Little known fact: instincts always re-surge, and violently, if we believe history. If the West is so terrible to black people, it’s a wonder all the African Americans (really just Africans, Magic Dirt only works on Dracula) haven’t moved back to their homeland… Ironically, in making out White People to be the problem, even in places they don’t exist or live, they are engaged in their own form of scientific racism, purporting that whites are somehow inferior (culturally, socially, morally).
Obviously. They made it, they own it. Cultural appropriation is one of those rare things SJWs got completely correct. Make your own, cultural welfare (symbolic theft) is wrong.
While it is technically cultural apartheid, there is flagrant disrespect in taking and using symbols and objects and
ideas (non-scientific) that are not one’s own, especially without careful handling and when such things are mocked or perverted (an insult in need of reply).
“Instead of decolonising museums, the new practices echo and reinforce a racial discourse. [DS: whose fault is that?] They present an idea of culture as fixed and immutable – something people own by virtue of biological ancestry. This racial view of the world should trouble us.”
That’s literally the only reason we have a diversity of cultures TO display. These people are never happy.
“It also follows, according to the logic of identity museum practice, that those outside the culture cannot truly understand it because they’ve never experienced it. It’s an approach that creates barriers between people. And also between people and artefacts. It advances the idea that cultures are separate and irreconcilable.”
A special kind of stupid.
“But handing over the right to narrate history to those with the approved ethnicity is not the way that knowledge works.”
Cultural symbols, subjective, not knowledge. They belong to those who created them and imbued them with meaning, like a sigil.
“There must be universal access. [DS; citation? reason?] That is how questions can be explored, and old forms of authority challenged.”
SJW Entryism at its finest. Let them in. Let them destroy you from the inside. We tried to warn you. Cultural Marxism doesn’t care. It is a prion disease – self-perpetuating to destruction by way of madness.
“It creates an idealised version of the past – one that never accounts for itself, because it cannot be questioned.”
They want to rewrite the past, trust these people…
“all kinds of information about past indigenous people, particularly religion, is now deemed ‘culturally sensitive’ and unsuitable for public discussion in these museums”
– because they’ll be disgraced as ‘racist’ and have funding withdrawn for going into the gory details of savagery and
depravity of raping babies to cure disease and eating them because they’re too dumb to grow crops and live in the desert knowing crops can’t grow but expecting them to, magically. Hell, Brit Druids used to sacrifice people for a good harvest, everyone has skeletons. Who wants to hear their ancestor was a monster?
Yet more genocide. Ask: Do these people really have the child’s best interests at heart? Knowing the Romanian Orphanage Studies, etc? Knowing the psychiatric problems caused by separation and proven conclusively? Rabbits thrive when their competition suffers, remember that.
“Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”
As covered here: http://wp.me/p10lxG-1nI
Incitement to this (and other) genocide is a crime, per se. Round ’em up, boys. Round. ‘Em. Up.
- “Third, the superficial connection between colour and culture would be severed. Racism would be wiped out. Racial ghettos would disappear; children of all races would live in all neighbourhoods.”
The delusion is strong. ….Based on WHAT? Sky fairies? Wood nymphs? WHAT.
This term again.
I feel it will be popping up a lot as HBD findings hit the MSM. The truth is bigoted, you know. Science is the tool of the Patriarchy because it exposes professional liars. Like, say, how distant twins have similar life outcomes and parenting has hardly any positive effect on the child (although there can be harm, obviously)? How identical twins raised by different parents (adopted by strangers) embody the phrase: blood will out, because genetics triumphs over local pressures? The Cinderella Effect, no? Nothing? No admission or twinge of guilt?
nb. Hence my coverage on the human rights violation and a slavery of our time: politely referred to as ‘forced adoption’. There are plenty of cases of care homes (child, special, elderly) abusing their charges coming out and more to come, I’m sure.
Btw, anyone interested by these topics:
I’ve heard good things about that course, it isn’t all saccharine ego stroking.
Onto a global topic.
Saving the world doesn’t work.
For those considering the genocide in MENA among others.
“Nearly 200 states signed on. Many scholars, activists and NGOs are guided by the ‘responsibility to protect’ doctrine. They point to the 2005 UN endorsement as evidence that it has become a norm that is global and enforceable.
Unfortunately, these lofty claims have no basis in reality. To begin with, R2P cannot be enforced.”
nb. Agenda 21 amusingly refers to native populations and the duty to protect them, pity it isn’t applied equally.
Postmodern law. Where genocide is good? You can’t outrun a gun.
It’s a con, like those Get Rich By Blogging people. It’s a diary. They’re adult men who keep an online diary.
Inattention and immorality
It’s about respect for elders and traditions, except present elder are Boomers, who have no traditions to pass on. That might be the problem.
‘an epidemic erosion of attention is a sure sign of an impending dark age’
The teachers don’t want to do their job and instill values like concentration (parents neither, but teachers are supposed to be trained and get paid for this).
You see this in our current official explanations for the social issues arising from race differences. “Institutional racism,” “stereotype threat,” “white privilege“: If you look closely at these concepts you see that they are essentially magical—mysterious emanations or vapors, invisible and unquantifiable, known only by their results, like the messages sent from the spirit world to a ouija board.
They point to data. That’s called measurement error.
They deliberately refrain from controlling their studies appropriately.
In the past couple of decades we’ve seen the rise of one particular explanatory strategy. That strategy recently acquired a name—or possibly it’s had the name for a while and I only just recently noticed. Whatever, I really like the name: Magic Dirt.
The core idea is that one’s physical surroundings—the bricks and mortar of the building you’re in, or the actual dirt you are standing on—emit invisible vapors that can change your personality, behavior, and intelligence.
About as logical as expecting you can school a tall kid into a short one.
Because according to the Left: nations don’t exist, borders are imaginary, but crossing into another will change your personality.
This was intended to go in another drafted post but it ended up longer than the original draft topic. As a tangent this is worth detailed excavation. It operates on no logical, genetic, moral level.
Reminder: The most ‘mixed’ Europeans (with other Europeans) are pure as driven snow:
The Beige People are promoted, and there is much mainstream media extolling of their imagined virtues, contrary to… evidence.
There are people who salivate over this prospect: ” “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.” Sickeningly racist.
This also flies in the face of recent genetic evolution, that clearly shows a divergence: “Human races are evolving away from each other,” Harpending says. “Genes are evolving fast in Europe, Asia and Africa, but almost all of these are unique to their continent of origin. We are getting less alike, not merging into a single, mixed humanity.” Further, “We show that humans are changing relatively rapidly on a scale of centuries to millennia, and that these changes are different in different continental groups.”
The myth of so-called hybrid vigour flies in the face of the most probable causes of desirable characteristics such as intelligence, for example low genetic load. Exactly what it sounds like. If you divide rocks between barrels, you’re still carrying rocks, the same load of rocks and this is why the latest developments in healthcare are refining treatments based on the common ailments of the patient’s demographic (race). Paying attention to this stuff is literally saving lives.
Hybrid vigour has been given the PC name ‘heterosis’ but its origins lie in the racism of claiming slaves are hardier when bred like prize animals. It is quite literally Scientific Racism to claim we must breed out the evolved diversity of innate differences of humans as if we’re cattle. Most people have a confirmed tendency toward genophilia and prefer to date and reproduce within their own race, what if this majority refuse? As we all know from LGBT+ campaigning, who you are sexually attracted to (and not to) can never be a choice.
“We intend to create in Europe a mixed race of Asiatic and Negroid people” source
However, The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study found Whites scored the highest at IQ106 and the mixed race IQ99, slightly below average. At best, the studies in this area have shown the mixed child averages between their parents, much like the inherited finding for height. The ‘magic dirt’ hypothesis of immigration is groundless and fell prey to the Sociologist’s Fallacy: “The evolutionary theory does however predict that when different races occupy approximately similar environments, such as for instance in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands, the intelligence differences will remain. This prediction has been examined in twenty three societies worldwide in Lynn (2008) and has been confirmed in every case.” – Lynn in 2010.
This bodes well for a global high IQ future.
Which leads to a healthy, growing economy.
There is no other way to do this but encourage WEIRD IQ levels.
Which are inherited.
The Flynn Effect has tailed off since nutrition has been resolved for children, the factor is finished and the formula/data tinkered with to follow its projections for publication (sounds familiar) but in all likelihood it is a demonstration of measurement error writ large, as modern supposedly more intelligent people struggle even with the language of previous generations, let alone their testing standards. This should not be possible [black swan/negative evidence]
Mixed studies are rarely done and beg the question – a mix of whom? A mixed children of European races, further subdivided into Northern/South territories could present IQ gains as the nations are high IQ, high technology societies already. A parent from these combined with a parent from a low IQ undeveloped nation could not. Furthermore, it is remiss to ignore the validity of genetic ties to native homeland, bound up in human rights. Globally, White people are a strict minority and such experimentation would clearly violate the UN conditions for genocide. Moreover, the recessive genomic nature of White traits, compared to and unlike all other races, mark it as unsuitable for such experiments intending to knowingly dominate and replace such natives with outgroup gene sequences, and would make it a form of institutional ethnic cleansing. Legally, these recessive races should deserve protections from such interference in much the same way as we protect endangered species. Or is a bird’s life worth more than that of a human? Reservations now or reservations later.
Altogether, mixed race children have poorer environmental outcomes (such as higher homicide rates) and it would be unethical to encourage this. One-drop theory refers to the dominance of certain racial sequences down the centuries, where unexpected baby skin coloration might arise for example. Considering Dawkin’s work, we do not truly own our genes to make this irresponsible choice, our responsibility as a carrier for them as meme will be to pass on as many of them as purely as possible into the future and this cannot be done by becoming the Mendelian cuckoldry party. Forensic anthropology have proven racial taxonomy goes down to the bone, whatever you call it. Ignoring the differences won’t stop Asia from researching them, it’s coming out eventually. You can be there or you can be on the wrong side of history. We can view these differences under a microscope, they are not imaginary. We have a duty to protect this natural diversity of Homo Sapiens into the future. Every race has a right to exist, live in their homeland and self-determine.
Hybrid vigour is a dangerous myth. There are strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, within every single race and genetic diaspora. These are not a bad thing. They are natural. All of them. Evolution has formed them as adaptive. We cannot understand the full relevance of these varied profiles and we are ethically bound to leave them alone before meddling in the very blueprint of life.
Finally, we already know the genetic sweet spot for health when it comes to Inbreeding and Outbreeding. We would know this evolutionary boon by its natural super-fertility.
It’s third-cousins that provide the perfect blend.
In a paper published today deCODE scientists establish a substantial and consistent positive correlation between the kinship of couples and the number of children and grandchildren they have. The study, which analyzes more than 200 years of deCODE’s comprehensive genalogical data on the population of Iceland, shows that couples related at the level of third cousins have the greatest number of offspring….
The findings hold for every 25-year interval studied, beginning with those born in the year 1800 up to the present day. Because of the strength and consistency of the association, even between couples with very subtle differences in kinship, the authors conclude that the effect very likely has a biological basis, one which has yet to be elucidated.
Unless you can come up with stronger findings (you can’t) –