The white-fishing becomes more overt

The Guardian caking on white chalk make-up was bad enough, what’s with the recent procession of white minstrels? Do they know how creepy that looks? It wouldn’t pass to an actual white person… It’s like one of those dead masks because of the flat contouring. They’ve just painted on a hotter woman’s face.

They’re not even hiding the racist tinge to it anymore. White men are so fucking weak not to call this out as creepy, they have no problem telling off their own for using ‘too much’ makeup (but also, not enough, whatever that means). It is not a compliment, it’s an insult. They think they can be white, better than white people can. Even Asian men are lightening their skin to improve their chances by tricking white women. White men never used to be so cowed. Did you know in America, non-white women couldn’t lighten their face (nor dye their hair lighter) because it could trick a white man into marrying them? Non-whites who attempted to ‘pass’ were lynched for the deceit. Nowadays they’re so cucked they’d probably thank the foreigner, like a simp. The appropriation is part of the great replacement, you twits. If you want the 50s back so badly, white culture must be preserved too, including beauty culture. I see why Vox laughs at America, celebrating its race-mixing out of existence and magically expecting British culture to remain.

The jooz psyop has worked on the lemmings. Guess which photos are staged versus real.
Clue: mixers are always fug.

This is how a race dies, one fetish at a time. This is why your parents had veto power over your spouse.

With every passing day, I begin to agree with MGTOW that all make-up should be banned.

All of it.

I like make-up but fuck me, this has gone too far.

Your everyday look should not look like a Hollywood SFX department.

Like, The Guardian started this:

The history books will ask WTF to the white minstrel shit, and the controlled ops shall shrug.

note: she isn’t smiling, she’s trying to look pleased

I love how you can see in the eyes of the white party how they regret it eventually. The ‘help me’ look. Cook the rice, pay the price. Burn the coal, pay the toll. The occasional pretty person who’s tricked by propaganda (usually a woman) lives to regret it, priceless grimace. There are times when infanticide is justified and that’s when God would call it an abomination. Imagine ruining your vagina for mystery meat.

This is why sub-fertility among the SJW is a feature, not a bug.

You can see they feel cheated, like, they didn’t expect their kids to actively be uglier than themselves. They didn’t think it was possible. It’s possible. Like that yellow fever woman in the Guardian bitching that her Muslim kids wouldn’t have blue eyes and pale skin for very long. Fucking DUH. I was in a waiting room quite recently and a very young white girl, 7-8, had a mixed black baby. Black eyes, squished face, demonic looking little thing, she had blue eyes, mousy blonde hair. She was ignoring the thing wriggling around being a nuisance for her iPhone. The parents were not present, which made me smile. When other people looked over because the baby got agitated, she rolled her eyes, leant down and pretended to fuss. Watching her from the corner of my eye, she immediately went back to her phone as soon as she thought people weren’t looking. Pretty parents neglect the ugly sprog. It’s cruel to make them. Obviously, the father was MIA. Their kids usually stare at me as one of the most attractive people in the room (not a flex, just a fact, being hot isn’t hard in this country) so I tend to notice the family set-up of the evil little thing that refuses to stop fucking staring. It’s rude. I just try to cover my face or turn away until they get the message. I hate being stared at. Another time a white mother was encouraging her mixed rugrat to stare at me, bouncing him on her knee about a foot away, expecting me to gush at her in PC platitudes about how cute it was. A whole fucking waiting room, totally empty and they sat beside me, so I knew their game. The Eastern Europeans are some of the biggest mudsharks here. She was also preggers with another one and the bloke was sitting next to her, looking smug. I ignored her for my magazine but she kept encouraging the kid to stare, it’s weird. She was almost tilting him into my lap. I am not going to praise anyone’s fucking abomination, you made your bed now lie in it, love.

We feel sorry for the kids, being pawns of their parents like that.

They seem to have done it purely for the validation of other white women, it’s pathetic.

Creepy Asian make-up again and the actual clown origins

So they’re basically painting on a white woman’s face, and this is supposed to be fine?

We’re just …..

not meant to say anything? If they’re going to be white supremacist about it and fetishize our features, could they at least admit it? They painted over a look that resembles many North Western European women in particular. It’s eerie. I can see why MGTOW want make-up banned, and as someone with those features naturally I 100% endorse the honesty of banning makeup, but it’s never gonna happen. They’ll never openly walk around with flat faces, African-like nose bridges (because they’re related by MtDNA) and those dead fish vacant middle distance stare eyes. Without make-up, the ones who had double lid surgery look like Downies, due to the squished orbital area of the skull (which cannot be operated on). It’s like women with lip filler HAVE to use matte lipstick, because shiny ones would show up the weird boundary of injection. I also see hints of that VS model who’s Catholic but mostly in the brows. They really are just painting on another face at this point and it should be illegal to marry someone who doesn’t know what you actually look like. England at one point did outlaw make-up as witchcraft and you can see why. We’d also have to ban cosmetic surgery though, worldwide, and good luck getting that done. The make-up tips aren’t even especially good, it’s just ‘how to look like a basic white girl’ and they look uncanny valley when they’re done. How retarded are the weebs for thinking this shit is real just because they didn’t use darker pigments? I agree with the memes, except waterproof make-up exists, so don’t take her swimming on the first date, take a make-up wipe and ‘challenge’ her to use it. If you don’t recognise that side of her face as her, ffs don’t breed with it. Do you see how ugly the half breeds are? Half neckbeard and half fish eyed genes, and for some weird reason most of the kids are obese too. At least if you have kids, let it be with a Jap and not a chink or korean with a fuckton of plastic surgery and a trowel’s worth of make-up. The rest of the world has to observe your mongrels and, as studies show, they’re associated more with lesser animals than human beings. Disgust is innate. You have a duty to prevent the birth of fugly kids. Men are judged heavily by whether their kids are ugly, merely breeding isn’t an accomplishment, the gays have got that one right. The investment must be worth it. I can respect the weebs who 1. move abroad 2. burn their passport and revoke their native citizenship so they can never come back and 3. get the snip because there is definite deceit going on here for project half-white oops baby. Just don’t inflict fug kids on the West years later because you got homesick. Should’ve thought about that before you cooked the rice. I’ve seen a lot of them move back in shame lately, tail between their legs, and everyone fucking despises them. They have the temerity to slag off ‘immigrants’ when they import one as a glorified concubine, who’ll hilariously leave him once the anchor baby has grown up and she gets her green card. Reddit stories are gold for this. Know them by their fruit, and it’s fucking fug. It reminds me of Marge Simpson after the make-up gun, if you couldn’t press a cotton face cloth against her face without another face of pure product appearing by magic, she isn’t even cute, dude. Buy a fleshlight, it’s cheaper than Tiger Moms in divorce court. The reprobate mind is clueless until it’s too late. No wonder the hapa forums hate their fetishist parents. Imagine being descended from the fake omega losers of two races and the host of medical problems that result. It’s an extremely cruel social experiment. I love how these videos always skip over the steps of lid tape and Nazi blue or light contact lenses, like WTF, that’s not Asian, is it? We all know what you’re trying to do. One of the most blatant racial tells is a tip stolen from Lisa Eldridge (most of these are) – only pale white people blush from the outside in. That’s why they apply blush on the cheekbone and blend in, because it’s characteristic to Northern Europeans. Nothing about them is original. Sodding r-types.
SPOT THE THOT, DODGE THE THOT. This has been your tutorial in spotting the thot for this year.
This video series mentions the blush tip she invented for white girls. Specifically the second video 8 minutes in.

QED – Can men please see through the bullshit? Only masculine women need to peacock like that. Peacocking is a male behaviour.

It’s literally circus freak make-up exaggerating white features, I have no problem posting proofs.
For comparison, genetic Asians have notoriously short, stubby, straight-out eyelashes. The full, thick, curved long ones are false. Literally, always fake. They do not have them naturally. It”s another thing they cut to randomly without saying they did it. Like they sprouted 5x the eyelash length and a totally inappropriate shape, racially. I hate jump cuts.

The funniest part is they’re ripping off freak show clown make-up and most guys are so clueless they don’t notice. That’s the REAL reason for using less pigment. It’d be obvious clownface. Using a full face of make-up can’t be called modesty, can it? The eyebrow tip in the Asian ripoff video was also overtly 1920s. Very curved and thin like the villain in Snow White. Proof:

A YT SJW called Mina Le does the same.

it’s a crazy tell

They’re trying to have larger, rounder, whiter looking eyes.

Transracial make-up has got to stop, it’s feature specific whiteface. Whitefishing bishes.

It was all literally devised by Lisa and only used by her at work until she posted tutorials, years later, online; yet naturally, they steal the credit… like they always do. Girls don’t have naturally orange cheeks. It’s more obvious than pink, the Asians just think they can get away with it, despite only some of them having yellow undertones.

The non-Lisa tips they use were stolen from a homosexual Welshman called Wayne Goss, mostly foundation techniques and nose contour. I expect you to check.
There’s also draping with one colour.

It’s French, historically. The matte look is for rank amateurs, like Kylie Jenner – and Asian thots.
This video mentions the lipstick in a blush shade, dabbed on. Like, nothing they do is original. NOTHING!

And this video describes the way white people blush from the outside inward by placement.

Because there’s no pigment blocking it in our temples.

So the Asians are placing it wrong because they’re dumb, it begins on the temples, thots. Not the space beside the ear. You look ill, Maam. They’re ripping off tips half their age.

Posted: 10 years ago.

LITERALLY A DECADE.

It’s okay to like it as a look, just be aware it’s fake.

And don’t gaslight people like me who know it’s fake. We haz receipts. White MUAs did it first.

Asians offended at race-bending thing they do

Stop getting surgery and using skin bleach or STFU.

I don’t see how that deluded girl’s use of make-up and apps is any different than yours.

They’re just jealous that she’s naturally prettier. Die mad about it. You’re not pale with blue eyes and blonde hair and a gracile jaw, suck it.

She’s responding to market forces.

Actors have done this for centuries, you’re not special. Asian minstrels larping as white didn’t exist until you had white people larping on stage to copy off of, it’s like trannies stealing “drag make-up” from the stage.

If the transrace thing is a thing maybe everyone is just not racist enough to self love?

Asians are also hilarious when they try historic, famously white vintage make-up styles. Say, like that tragic cat eye flick.

You don’t look like Marilyn, you look like a cartoon about the opium war.

Who u foolin?

Her pretending Asians don’t wanna look white is funny when they’re literally bleaching their skin*, hair, eyebrows, getting lip surgery, jaw surgery, eye surgery, breast, ass and hip fat implants/injections and then deliberate, daily make-up looks of classic white beauties, all to look white.

Cat-eye flick only looks good with white girl eyes, just accept it and stay in your lane.

It’s like how Africans claim to be blonde because of one island of inbreds. Yeah, no shit they’re recessive?? Anomalies mean nothing. A few Europeans look Asian, it means nothing. Maybe an ancestor had an affair, probably?

*The REAL reason they have to wear tons of high SPF, it’s medical. With the ongoing treatment, their skin is as damaged as a chemo patient. That’s why they wear SPF indoors where there’s no sun. The light through the window would cause burns on the bleached skin. Look it up. It’s known about the “treatment” for things like the patchy thing, vitiligo?

It’s either “racist” or “privileged” – just deflect the criticisms, right? We’re sick of it.

Privilege appeals to white supremacy – to call white people “privileged” on the basis of genetics is literally pushing a white supremacy argument, coupling with shame instead of pride. It’s still the same exact theory. It implies there’s nothing we can do about it and to pity the brown and yellow people for being genetically impoverished.

Shit, sorry make-up techniques designed by us, for us, look better on us?

Funny how that works, and applies to EVERYTHING.

I have seen the funny spectacle of Japanese men who thought they looked white by wearing our suits.

It doesn’t work on them. It wasn’t meant for them.

Sure, this girl looks like Ditto – but she’ll grow out of it and appreciate being hotter than these cunts.

It is awkward that some Asians actually look like that, just with a broader flatter nose.

It would be like pretending the Jeremy Kyle people don’t exist.

People are allowed to have a range of features, must we patronise Asians like we pander to blacks now, pretending they’re all cute?

Rhinoplasty essential oil:

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Nose-Up-Heighten-Rhinoplasty-Essential-Oil-30ml-Nasal-Bone-Rmodeling-Pure-Natural-Nose-Care-Thin-Smaller/32792535834.html

It’s annoying as a woman when a moron from another race asks “how you did” something…. with your face. It isn’t make-up. Most people don’t contour their face to oblivion and draw on new eyes. Like, what do you say? It’s a race thing, you can’t say anything! You could literally get arrested for admitting you have an eye shape. Oh, but they can ask offensive questions, and we can’t ask why they try it on with us…. uhuh.

Diabetes caused by… make-up??!

While the thots are eating their aluminium like good little morons, there’s a great causative agent of diabetes lurking in all those shitty “highlighters” that do the same thing anyway (compare Dior ingredients to Topshop).

It’s in things everyone consumes like toothpaste.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180620125907.htm
And candy, and food, and paper….

Is somebody trying to poison us?

Obviously.

In the mid-20th century, titanium dioxide pigment replaced highly toxic lead-based pigments. It became the most commonly used white pigment in paints and in foods, medications, toothpaste, cosmetics, plastics and paper. As a result, annual production of titanium dioxide has increased by 4 million tons since the 1960s.

Who bought it beforehand?

Who bought all the titanium before bringing it to market as ‘safer’?

According to the World Health Organization, the number of people with diabetes has quadrupled during the past four decades, affecting approximately 425 million people, with T2D comprising the majority of recorded cases. Although obesity and an aging population are still considered major factors leading to a rise in T2D cases worldwide, Heller’s study suggests that increased use of titanium dioxide may also be linked to the rapid rise in the number of people suffering from the disease.

Huh.

“The increased use of titanium dioxide over the last five decades could be a factor in the Type 2 diabetes epidemic,” Heller said. “The dominant T2D-associated pancreatic particles consist of TiO2 crystals, which are used as a colorant in foods, medications and indoor wall paint, and they are transported to the pancreas in the bloodstream. The study raises the possibility that humanity’s increasing use of TiO2 pigment accounts for part of the global increase in the incidence of T2D.”

Why are Government buildings the same damn white colour?

We know we can breathe that shit in.

Given the wide-reaching implications of his findings, Heller is keen to repeat the study, but this time using a larger sample. “We have already begun a broader study,” he said. “Our work isn’t over yet.””

You heard it here first.

Eat your aluminium, thots

That’s right, smear on a lipstick full of shimmery bullshit. Including lead (and wonder why girls are depressed). [Literally eating lead.]

The Victorians ate arsenic but this is worse. Arsenic temporarily improved the complexion.

Using the term ‘mica’ for what’s essentially powdered foil suggests women wouldn’t want it if they knew what it was.

It isn’t like there’s a connection between dissected and tested Alzheimer’s plaques and aluminium deposits, is there?

Why are the Boomers raised on cans of this stuff seeing an explosion in Alzheimer’s rates?

As always, at first, go to the ‘officials’. Find out the Party Line.

https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-dementia/risk-factors-and-prevention/metals-and-dementia
Although aluminium has been seen in amyloid plaques”

K.

“there is no solid evidence that aluminium is increased in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease.”
Whew, what cognitive dissonance.
It’s literally forming those plaques that ARE the disease but nbd?

Solid evidence – like a solid chemical analysis of solid plaques in the solid brains of solid dead people with Alzheimer’s?

Look at the hustle to move those goalposts.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070813185007.htm
“Because some people with the disease had aluminum deposits in their brains, it was thought that there was a direct connection…”
Well… yeah.
That’s proof.
There’s no negative evidence possible for that to stop being proof.

It’s literally in their brains.

“However, after many years of study, no conclusive evidence links aluminum to neurodegenerative disease”
Bullshit, 2007.

I detest scientism. Look at these papers and tell me what’s ‘conclusive’.

(Apart from donations of mega-corps to Super PACs to prevent this mega-lawsuit).

“A multi-institutional team of researchers has defined for the first time how metal ions bind to amyloid fibrils in the brain in a way that appears toxic to neurons. Amyloid fibrils are linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Creutzfeldt-Jakob. Although metal ions, most notably copper, can bind to amyloid in several specific ways, the researchers found that only one way appears toxic.”

But how, ‘critics’ argue, could this possibly occur? What’s the mechanism? Nobody has proven a mechanism….?

2011:

“Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: The Integration of the Aluminum and Amyloid Cascade Hypotheses”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056430/

“In particular, the link between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease has been the subject of scientific debate for several decades. However, the complex characteristics of aluminum bioavailability make it difficult to evaluate its toxicity and therefore, the relationship remains to be established.”

Uhuh. Isn’t that your job?

If it’s impossible, why are you getting paid?

“On the contrary, aluminum is a widely recognized neurotoxin that inhibits more than 200 biologically important functions and causes various adverse effects in plants, animals, and humans.”

True.

Mounting evidence has suggested that significance of oligomerization of β-amyloid protein and neurotoxicity in the molecular mechanism of AD pathogenesis. Aluminum may play crucial roles as a cross-linker in β-amyloid oligomerization.

Here, we review the detailed characteristics of aluminum neurotoxicity based on our own studies and the recent literatures. Our aim is to revisit the link between aluminum and AD and to integrate aluminum and amyloid cascade hypotheses in the context of β-amyloid oligomerization and the interactions with other metals.”

But HOW could this POSSIBLY operate? – intellectually dishonest douches.

Note the prestige of journal. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, those hacks.

But on a MOLECULAR level…. – douchecanoes.

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.739
“Quantification of the Aβ peptide in Alzheimer’s plaques by laser dissection microscopy combined with mass spectrometry”

It’s behind a paywall but it’s there. Check the academic pirate bay.

http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/2000/articles/2000-v15n01-p021.shtml
It’s been known for a while.
2000: “Aluminum has been identified as a neurotoxin for over 100 years.”

So stop using it in food, cosmetics, deodorant, cookware and cans?

Their use actually came in well after it was a known neurotoxin. Because that isn’t dodgy.

Reference for that sentence:

Doelken P:Naunynschmiedeberger. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 40: 58-120 cited by Crapper McLachlan DR., Lukiw WJ, Kruck TPA, Aluminum, altered transcription, and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Environ Geochem Health, 1990; 12(1-2): 103-114.

Link for that: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01734059

Opening paragraph.

“The etiology of some, if not all, cases of Alzheimer’s disease is linked to a mutation in the proximal portion of the long arm of chromosome 21∶21q11.2 → 21q22.2. While the functional consequences of the mutation are unknown, we speculate that one consequence of the mutation is loss of the natural barriers and intracellular ligands for aluminum. As a result, aluminum gains access to several brain sites including the nuclear compartment in certain neurons of the central nervous system.”

I know both my shit and my bullshit.

1990. Who owns the aluminium? That’d be a fun tour of genocide.

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ana.410310310
1992 laser study, note prestige of journal.

What the fuck do they know, right, reddit?

“Selective accumulation of aluminum and iron in the neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease: A laser microprobe (LAMMA) study”

“In addition, probe sites directed to neurons identified in snapfrozen cryostat sections from 2 subjects with Alzheimer’s disease revealed similar spectra with prominent aluminum‐related peaks, confirming that our findings are not related to exogenous contamination through fixation, embedding, or other procedures prior to analysis. This study further confirms the association of aluminum and neurofibrillary tangle formation in Alzheimer’s disease.”
1992.

But I guess I’m just scared of non-stick pans, where’s the evidence?

The guys who complain about make-up

are also the ones who’d complain if a woman smells like anything other than floral body lotion.

Like, they’ll criticize women for being fat but also being “high maintenance” i.e. not fat.

Nah-uh!

By ancient standards, you’re more decadent than a French king.

Think how poofy you’d be.

 

You sleep on fluffy pillows, on stitched mattresses, with plush blankets, having used liquid soap, shampoo, conditioner, toothpaste, deodorant, a comb, an electric razor, central heating/air conditioning, with a glass of cold milk waiting in your refrigerator if you wake up thirsty. You think this is nothing and feel entitled to this and more.

 

Who’s the vain one? When are these guys dispensing with all their vanities?

First up, the smartphone! Ultimate vanity symbol! Don’t need that!

Right….?

Right guys?

No, you won’t give up modern comforts so STFU lecturing everyone else.

Do it yourself first and then you might have something to signal with.

 

Being attractive isn’t a sin! These embittered boys are like SJWs and want everyone else to stop making an effort because they’re too lazy! (Covert narcissism, their ego is triggered because they stand out for not making the effort).
R-types want an equalist playing field, remember? Equal outcomes. They actually believe it’s better we’re all equal in stench and skin ailments (skin cancer exists) than feel insecure some dude next to them on the train is wearing nice jeans and a cool cologne.
Men against make-up, for a third-world society looking and smelling like shit.
It already does, in my opinion, let’s not make it worse. The average person makes less effort with their appearance than at any time period before in all human history.
Fashion history exists, whether you read it or not.
Porn taught you “make-up” (please define make-up, guys who can’t spot eyeliner) is a sexual invite and you’re pissed the fiction is fake. That isn’t the world’s fault. That’s your fault for being dumb. (They also think natural beauty is a sexual invitation because addicts are gullible idiots).
What other people look like and how they groom their body has nothing to do with you. Stop being so shallow and obsessing over it.
Grooming is a basic primate instinct. If you don’t have it, you’re clinically depressed.
They look at a naturally pretty girl and think she’s a bitch for wearing lipstick – who’s sinning here?
Jesus himself went off on one at the person who dared call his oil bath vain. There is a spiritual bond between how we treat ourselves (with respect) and how we act in the world (decently).
How dare any of you Americans (and it’s always Americans) shame people about simple standards of appearance?
I’ve been to your country enough times to know you have Fuck-All to be proud of in the appearance stakes.
Romans 12:1, NKJV. “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service
1 Corinthians 10:31, NKJV. “Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.”
I Corinthians 6:19-20, NKJV. “Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? 20 For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
And there’s nothing sinful about having a woman’s body either, God made that too. To insult a woman’s natural form is to blaspheme God’s design.
Genesis 1:27, NKJV. “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”
Beautification is not a sin, and never has been (there are plenty of Biblical references about good, moral wives looking good too and being the pride of their husbands) it’s about a First World living standard and a longer lifespan, pride is the sin. Like presuming to judge other’s non-silicon appearance and the body/Temple God gave them…
If you look at the history of cosmetics, it’s always been primarily about health because, guess what? Healthy people are more attractive! Cosmeceuticals are not a new thing! Only in the past couple of centuries have they been separated off. Why? Legal reasons. Lower standards for non-medical products to hit the market or that they couldn’t prove the really subjective claims e.g. radiant smile. What’s that? How do you medically prove that?
These would be the “men” who attack other men for wanting to make the best of their appearance.
Leave them alone and join a pro-ugly group, you losers.
Sorry attractive people enjoying their life make you sad, but this isn’t a company’s fault, it’s evolution. [Explain sexual selection without attractiveness, I fucking dare you.]
Since it’s none of your business unless it’s your wife, join a monastery if attractive things frighten you. Do you balk at flowers and smiling babies too?
If everyone went back to smelling like ass and swamp crotch, you’d still be bottom of the barrel and whine about it. Fitness still exists.
Sports are as decadent as Hollywood but the guys claiming models shouldn’t be paid for what nature gave them never ever apply that logic to the genetic freaks known as athletes.
They’d only be happy in the world of Harrison Bergeron because pretty people couldn’t oppress them by comparison. Dya wanna ban Photoshop too? You do, don’t you?
It’s basic etiquette to look good and act good too.
This isn’t an either/or, don’t try to spin a false dichotomy out of this.
Looking like a slob is a sin as much as being it. It’s literally a sin to apply sloth to your personal care habits.
When are you banning mouthwash for making men seem more attractive than their natural oral bacteria (including the likes of Herpes) might suggest?
Jesus never used mouthwash. QED according to you.

Hating make-up isn’t new

It’s old as the hills.

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A85852.0001.001/1:4?rgn=div1;view=fulltext;q1=Beauty%2C+Personal+–++Early+works+to+1800

“A discourse of auxiliary beauty. Or artificiall hansomenesse. In point of conscience between two ladies.”

Here, male authors try to “satirize” the conversation as happening between women.

To cover the fact they just don’t like it, when they don’t need to like it.

Get over it.

Not your woman? Not your problem.

If only the ancients had a term for this specifically, to tell prissy people like this to STFU.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_gustibus_non_est_disputandum

Uh…. yeah, they did.

Women are fussier about looks and presentation than men could ever be, that’s why we do so many things. If we’re allowed to impose preferences, men would never stop complaining about it.

They literally circlejerk the same question for millennia.

Why do women do it?

You answered your own question there, didn’t cha?

It isn’t as if it’s a modern trend or unrelated to health. They never say to stop cleaning your armpits or brushing your teeth or tweezing brows or using skin creams.

Do you think women like scruffy modern rapper lookalike men?

ruffian

The hideous shorts? The obnoxious deodorants and colognes that invade our personal space?

Madam,

I Am not more pleased to see you look so well, beyond what you were wont, than I am jealous (to be free with you) lest a per∣son so esteemed, as you are for modesty and piety, should use some colour or tincture to advance your Complexion; which indeed I take to be no better, than that odious and infamous way of Painting; every where in all ages so much, and so justly spoken a∣gainst both by God, and good men; being a most ungodly practise, though generally (as they say) now used in England (more or less) by persons of quality; who not con∣tent with Natures stock of Beauty, do (not by a fine, but filthy art) adde something to the advantage, as they think, of their Com∣plexions: but I fear, to the deforming of their souls, and defiling of their Consciences.

Men care so much because their visual systems are over-active, it’s nothing to do with women. Blaming us for breathing in your direction isn’t temptation, it’s personal weakness. We should be able to walk around looking feminine safely.

Either that or we dress like men and you still complain.

We can bring back public standards but men dropped the ball earlier and harder. No more PJs in public, no low-hanging jeans, bring back waistcoats and about five layers of stuff to pick up a pint of milk, fine. That’s fine by us.

When was the last time you wore silver collar stays?
Oh, and they have to be silver, you don’t want anyone to think you’ve “let yourself go” (see: America).

There’s no such thing as natural beauty, it’s a marketing con. Humans have pores, wrinkles, oil and sweat. I notice they never complain about deodorant, female menstrual and cleaning products, shampoo and conditioner, perfume or body sprays…. in other words, they’re fussy hypocrites. If they wanted a natural beauty, we’d be covered in so many reeking bodily fluids saturating a LOT of body hair that they would be able to smell us a mile off.

Gross? Yeah. Leave the beauty products alone, it isn’t for the sake of our own noses and eyes. It’s considerate.

Update: the title was too subtle. They hate it because women do it. That is the be-all and end-all on the subject. Anything women and women only do, they have a problem with. I’m sure it’s all a coincidence and they’re very conveniently principled against anything feminine. Methinks the “men” (mostly gay) protest too much?

I’m sure they don’t want women to drop all their feminine habits so they and their T of the LGBT fame can steal it and with it, the straight men they long for, the ultimate catch?

(Pay attention fools).

Ancient Romans wore lipstick, nobody gave a shit. Most pomades and other preparations are good for you (eyeliner was the ancient sunglasses, lead paint was SPF). There are ancient men discovered wearing hair gel. We may or may not personally like it (tastes differ) but we don’t tell you to stop it or stop selling it. That’s called respect for men. If you want to look that way, on your head be it.