Hating make-up isn’t new

It’s old as the hills.

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A85852.0001.001/1:4?rgn=div1;view=fulltext;q1=Beauty%2C+Personal+–++Early+works+to+1800

“A discourse of auxiliary beauty. Or artificiall hansomenesse. In point of conscience between two ladies.”

Here, male authors try to “satirize” the conversation as happening between women.

To cover the fact they just don’t like it, when they don’t need to like it.

Get over it.

Not your woman? Not your problem.

If only the ancients had a term for this specifically, to tell prissy people like this to STFU.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_gustibus_non_est_disputandum

Uh…. yeah, they did.

Women are fussier about looks and presentation than men could ever be, that’s why we do so many things. If we’re allowed to impose preferences, men would never stop complaining about it.

They literally circlejerk the same question for millennia.

Why do women do it?

You answered your own question there, didn’t cha?

It isn’t as if it’s a modern trend or unrelated to health. They never say to stop cleaning your armpits or brushing your teeth or tweezing brows or using skin creams.

Do you think women like scruffy modern rapper lookalike men?

ruffian

The hideous shorts? The obnoxious deodorants and colognes that invade our personal space?

Madam,

I Am not more pleased to see you look so well, beyond what you were wont, than I am jealous (to be free with you) lest a per∣son so esteemed, as you are for modesty and piety, should use some colour or tincture to advance your Complexion; which indeed I take to be no better, than that odious and infamous way of Painting; every where in all ages so much, and so justly spoken a∣gainst both by God, and good men; being a most ungodly practise, though generally (as they say) now used in England (more or less) by persons of quality; who not con∣tent with Natures stock of Beauty, do (not by a fine, but filthy art) adde something to the advantage, as they think, of their Com∣plexions: but I fear, to the deforming of their souls, and defiling of their Consciences.

Men care so much because their visual systems are over-active, it’s nothing to do with women. Blaming us for breathing in your direction isn’t temptation, it’s personal weakness. We should be able to walk around looking feminine safely.

Either that or we dress like men and you still complain.

We can bring back public standards but men dropped the ball earlier and harder. No more PJs in public, no low-hanging jeans, bring back waistcoats and about five layers of stuff to pick up a pint of milk, fine. That’s fine by us.

When was the last time you wore silver collar stays?
Oh, and they have to be silver, you don’t want anyone to think you’ve “let yourself go” (see: America).

There’s no such thing as natural beauty, it’s a marketing con. Humans have pores, wrinkles, oil and sweat. I notice they never complain about deodorant, female menstrual and cleaning products, shampoo and conditioner, perfume or body sprays…. in other words, they’re fussy hypocrites. If they wanted a natural beauty, we’d be covered in so many reeking bodily fluids saturating a LOT of body hair that they would be able to smell us a mile off.

Gross? Yeah. Leave the beauty products alone, it isn’t for the sake of our own noses and eyes. It’s considerate.

Update: the title was too subtle. They hate it because women do it. That is the be-all and end-all on the subject. Anything women and women only do, they have a problem with. I’m sure it’s all a coincidence and they’re very conveniently principled against anything feminine. Methinks the “men” (mostly gay) protest too much?

I’m sure they don’t want women to drop all their feminine habits so they and their T of the LGBT fame can steal it and with it, the straight men they long for, the ultimate catch?

(Pay attention fools).

Ancient Romans wore lipstick, nobody gave a shit. Most pomades and other preparations are good for you (eyeliner was the ancient sunglasses, lead paint was SPF). There are ancient men discovered wearing hair gel. We may or may not personally like it (tastes differ) but we don’t tell you to stop it or stop selling it. That’s called respect for men. If you want to look that way, on your head be it.

Video: American on chav makeup

She doesn’t know that’s what it is, but damn. She burnt it to the ground and she’s dancing in the ashes. The best reviews are actually the black girls because they don’t hold back. They don’t care about your feelings. It’s magnificent.

I spat out my tea.

Do you know how rare that is?

Do you know how expensive this tea is?

If only the likes of Beyonce had half her personality.

OT

but

can we all

take a moment

to appreciate

this expression.

You would never catch a white girl doing this, mad respect.

Video: Arabic vs. Indian Makeup

Responding to the enduring and fatiguing popularity of any makeup post, this is the kind of education I can get behind and really endorse.

Such a sweet woman and a refreshing change from certain other Indian women who denied their heritage and tried to white-out themselves with foundation and blown-out dodgy lighting to the extent they’re lighter than me, a Brit. Love yourself. Hiding what you’ve got defeats the point.

This is how you do looks respectfully. Take notes.

On the topic, there’s really no British look, it’s similar to an older French style because we’ve been borrowing from them since we both had a monarchy. Women used to make their own cosmetics, like powder from flour. We made lip tint from beetroot and blush from rhubarb, by the time companies got involved it wasn’t new. Mascara was literally from pitch or soot over some type of oil or jelly. Makes me laugh when silly (normally US) men say they’re gonna “ban cosmetics”. K, hun. K, sure. Ban food. Ban honey and sugar and oats we use to scrub faces too. Willow charcoal, burnt and ground up brown herbs… you can’t ban nature, babe. Ban soap and tweezers and scissors. Mint tooth products.

Men wore cosmetics, especially in court. Powdered wigs still technically remain, in legal court. Deodorant is male perfume, it’s a cosmetic. Fake tan is a TON of makeup, more than any historical man wore. Even the Greeks. Even the fops.

Scotland I can’t speak for but Irish looks are about the hair and the plumpness, so to speak. They like to look healthy.

Welsh women go really out there with eye definition and it’s hard to say if they affect Scotland, who tend to blend various looks.

English is the classic Rose type and that’s a natural look; warm lipgloss or stain worked into the mouth with clear gloss over the top, blusher is important, no bronzer. NO bronzer and a peachy or cream powder. This is possible because primer isn’t really a traditional thing, like the French we allow moisturiser to sink in. Eye makeup varies, the 40s style covered by glamourdaze is correct that it wasn’t as important as lips. Culturally, women were allowed lipstick in our rations because it kept up morale. Eyeliner was natural-looking, like a more subtle Monroe. Look at Vivien Leigh, doll-like but not heavy. Women could compete to wear as much lipstick as possible in Blitz reds to seem the most patriotic. This is why we had to invent lipliner, basically.

Violet and rose products remain popular. Lavender from the Victorian era on.

Video: Instagram Bitch Look

Very Brit sarcasm.

Now I need a male version with 300-style contoured abs and eight month old gay bar trends they insist they didn’t steal.

This is the warmed-over chav look again, I previously mentioned.

Most Americans don’t even know what a chav is, yet they look like the 2004 version.

Creepy similarity to Helen Flanagan here.

If it isn’t enough these Russian women get Kirk’s alien sex doll surgery, they spend so much on makeup, more than the surgery. Why people think I go easy on whites is beyond me, I mock us most of all.

What cultural appropriation?

That’s so disrespectful.

She was a monarch and she was murdered.

What’s next, Diana?

You gonna open with a slow-mo car crash?

American trash whore bloggers, plugging their shitty products (always the same dozen or so brands) and abusing our history to do it. These girls always trowel it on to hide their hideous real features as well, especially the nose. But they’re too vain to suck it up like the Jewish girls and get a nosejob. Sure, fine, lecture us on ‘real beauty’ from behind 17 layers of silicon….

Meanwhile, here’s what Marie really looked like.

Wear all the makeup in the world, you’ll never be 1% as naturally alluring as this woman.
Kills you, don’t it? If white women are so flawed, why u constantly trying to look like us, dress like us and name your kids like us?

This tart up top isn’t fit to lick the Queen’s boots, this is completely abhorrent to anyone who reads.
Marie and her husband weren’t actually responsible for the French Revolution, it was Louis XV and his debauchery. He was initially called The Beloved but reviled by the time he died, as people found out what a degenerate manwhore he was. Everyone despised him. Among his many crimes against morality was to kidnap nubile daughters, almost always against the parents’ will, have them locked up- and rape them.
http://world4.eu/madame-de-pompadour-political-power-general-influence/

“The foundation of that infamous establishment where Louis XV kept young girls, whom he had in many instances caused to be forcibly taken from their parents…”

You wanna talk about rape culture?
Dissolute monarchs completely deserved the block.
Marie is mentioned at the end. She never wanted to be Queen. Back up, hoe.

Do a French-inspired look, fine, we don’t give a shit. We can just laugh when you fuck it up because Europeans don’t use a fifth of the makeup of parvenu Nouveau-Americans.
Do not perpetuate lies about good people. Have you Americans lost all respect for the dead?
Looking at the way you treat statues (you might as well dig up dead bodies like we did Cromwell, ‘cept he deserved it) I’m thinking so.

Why do non-whites think it’s OK to rip off our history?

And who in their right mind wants cornrows and tacky patterns anyway?
You have yours, we have ours. That was the deal.

The whole Princess culture is strictly European, other cultures might’ve borrowed it but the closest is the Empress system of Asia or perhaps the geisha (who were prostitutes, the world is laughing at you if you imitate that).

It’s a repetitive thing where they lie with their camera and lighting choice and STILL dial up the contrast until they look white. I was shocked when the camera tracked on her real face, and that’s minus just the thick cack-handed makeup.

Warning: cack-handed makeup is always ugly makeup.

BTW, those white phenotype contacts lenses are always creepy.

Always.

Asian and black girls keep brushing on freckles now too.

Oh, so it’s fine for everyone else to racebend?

WTH.

I have another post I mostly wrote where I go into what’s really wrong with the ‘beauty community’, namely that men are allowed to dictate to women how we should look, what is feminine today: that we should look like men trying to be women.

However, a second and almost equally virulent issue is ripping off various ‘influences’ and acting like it’s okay to cosplay real, dead people. These people would reee if we pointed out Beyonce’s talentless thunder thighs but apparently they can rob the dead for cosmetic tips but there’s no equality.

???

Like, we are (free) to buy fake tan, but not (free) to buy skin lighteners in the West.

They’re allowed to be sold to non-whites though, who don’t actually need them for medical reasons, unlike white people. We’re allowed brighteners, which are close but don’t really work on white skin.

Anyone racebending looks stupid.

Anyone.

You cannot look a different race.

It’s forensic, you cheap-looking slappers.

Update: This girl isn’t even attractive by the standards of her own race/country.

She’s no Nutan.

Yes, Asians fake eyelids

They fake a lot, actually. This is level 1 of Operation Half-White Baby.

Asian cosmetics are plain better than ours, if you bother to look. The intent of it all? Snag a husband.

But the white girls are fake for using concealer, right? Red lipstick?

While the manosphere is discussing the pedomorphic neotony of Asians, with a focus on the eyes and claiming this is superior because it’s more feminine than white women…..

…that’s because it literally isn’t real.

Let’s quote the denizens of Roosh V’s forum, shall we?

There is a reason women put on fake eyelashes, it will make their eyes look a bit more distanced from each other and larger. With the help of makeup they can look more “sweet”

They basically don’t have eyelashes. Short stubby things that grow directly outward.

It’s part of the fake femininity thing. Here we call it a cutesy act.
Remember, most fake geek girls were/are Asian.
As I pointed out before, otherwise their childish looks would freak you out, if they behaved their age.


The fake eyelashes are worse than a Kardashian. How are you not getting this?

More fake lids!


Superior femininity, right guys?

Bigeye widespace girls are quality. Warm, generous, sensitive.

Deep socket girls have intellectual depth, honesty, and conscientiousness.

ANOTHER!


The surgery can be superb though….


You’d never know, would you!
Well, until she gives birth. By then, you’re fucked too!
If natural lids were retained, this would be the result.


It’s called “monolid makeup”, look it up.

Because white women are traps.

Race traps.

Look at the angle of the eyebrows. There is no nurturing quality at all. Combined with her eyes there is a soul-less quality to her stare. I can’t quite tell what it is about the eyebrows but hopefully you guys see it too.

I may be going insane but I’ve picked up on certain facial characteristics that tend to be common with bitchy and non-nurturing females.
The biggest one is the manjaw of course.
Also, small beady eyes that are close together.

While on the subject of Edenic anthropology, Asian women can have manjaws.

That chick is not widespace, but she is definitely bigjaw and wideface. The latter two are testosterone indicators, so I would expect more aggression, abrasiveness, higher sex drive – pretty much how Roissy describes his lawyer chicks. Her eyes are not very large, either, so reduced sensitivity.

Most of them do, actually.

You just aren’t looking.
The hate-on for whites is too strong.
This graphic is from a facial study.
Label of graphic is:
Fig-1-Frontal-views-of-different-ethnic-face-types-From-left-to-right-white-Asian
Back-up here for convenience’s sake:

Fig-1-Frontal-views-of-different-ethnic-face-types-From-left-to-right-white-Asian

Look at that manjaw. Look at that thing! You can grate cheese on it. It is a sign of high testosterone.
In other words, if you have two equally cute girls, go with the one with the higher pitched voice, the more feminine waist to hip ratio, and the smaller jawline.

WHR? Asian women are definitely out.
More Roosh forum quotes! Always more!

Masculine facial traits include:

Pronounced chin
Robust brow region; small eyes
Marked mandibular breadth (wide jaw)
Strong chin
High, pronounced nose bridge and/or greater nasal width

Perhaps if I use their own words, it’ll sink in.

Feminine facial traits are neontenous traits, signals of youth (i.e. traits that children/babies have), basically the opposite of above:

Gracile features, flatter faces
Reduced chin
Reduced brow region; large eyes
Weak chin
Low, subdued nose bridge, with lesser nasal width

In context, this part is hilarious.

This is why East Asian girls and white girls are so popular among men. East Asian girls have the most gracile facial morphology; white girls “cheat” with large eyes. 

It’s like they can’t see over their erection.

Studies? No? No studies?

Like, one group is literally faking its eyelids and not one of them has the slightest idea.
But they’re 100% accurate judges of women, yes Siree!

not one had the intellectual curiosity to look it up

A little more, I have plenty of salt spare to rub in this ax wound


You could build a boat with a jaw that broad, their long hair is meant to conceal it.

And if you compare the races…


Source: http://www.asianplasticsurgeryguide.com/overview/asianeuropeanface.html

Update backup photo:

White women are gracile in bone structure. According to the plastic surgeons.

Maths, I hear you cry?!

Asians are literally broader as a race.

http://www.asianplasticsurgeryguide.com/overview/westernization.html
http://www.asianplasticsurgeryguide.com/news11-1/031104_han-chinese-most-typical.html

Here’s something to trigger you, if you’re naive to China.

“Either way, the world’s most common face is, and will continue to be, fully Asian, whether Eastern or Southern, well into the distant future.
The concept of “Asian” cosmetic surgery as a limited subspecialty of plastic surgery is already disappearing as this evolving discipline now encompasses the largest patient base on the planet.
Celebrities and models glorified in the West (and East) as today’s “beautiful” are already old news, really just tomorrow’s “fixer-uppers,” even if they don’t yet know it.


Can we get Heartiste’s take on that?
Sounds fake but OK.
Like none of those bitches would look like Amber Heard, given half a chance.

What does this mean for cosmetic surgery? Look for a “new” phase in Asian plastic surgery where the primary goal will be to look better rather than mainly different or “Westernized.” Operations like double eyelid surgery, epicanthoplasty, cheek and jaw reductions, calf nerve ablations, and so on will degrade into obscure footnotes in old textbooks on outdated plastic surgery.

“Ethnic” plastic surgery will come to refer to surgery on the European or Western population seeking “Easternization.” A whole new group of operations will be developed in response to new demands.
When will all of this happen? In a hundred years? In fifty years? With the present rate of change, give it a good ten years.”

Don’t let mathematical fact get in the way of your fetish.

They’ve been trying to replace white women this whole time.
This whole time, anime was war.