Diabetes caused by… make-up??!

While the thots are eating their aluminium like good little morons, there’s a great causative agent of diabetes lurking in all those shitty “highlighters” that do the same thing anyway (compare Dior ingredients to Topshop).

It’s in things everyone consumes like toothpaste.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180620125907.htm
And candy, and food, and paper….

Is somebody trying to poison us?

Obviously.

In the mid-20th century, titanium dioxide pigment replaced highly toxic lead-based pigments. It became the most commonly used white pigment in paints and in foods, medications, toothpaste, cosmetics, plastics and paper. As a result, annual production of titanium dioxide has increased by 4 million tons since the 1960s.

Who bought it beforehand?

Who bought all the titanium before bringing it to market as ‘safer’?

According to the World Health Organization, the number of people with diabetes has quadrupled during the past four decades, affecting approximately 425 million people, with T2D comprising the majority of recorded cases. Although obesity and an aging population are still considered major factors leading to a rise in T2D cases worldwide, Heller’s study suggests that increased use of titanium dioxide may also be linked to the rapid rise in the number of people suffering from the disease.

Huh.

“The increased use of titanium dioxide over the last five decades could be a factor in the Type 2 diabetes epidemic,” Heller said. “The dominant T2D-associated pancreatic particles consist of TiO2 crystals, which are used as a colorant in foods, medications and indoor wall paint, and they are transported to the pancreas in the bloodstream. The study raises the possibility that humanity’s increasing use of TiO2 pigment accounts for part of the global increase in the incidence of T2D.”

Why are Government buildings the same damn white colour?

We know we can breathe that shit in.

Given the wide-reaching implications of his findings, Heller is keen to repeat the study, but this time using a larger sample. “We have already begun a broader study,” he said. “Our work isn’t over yet.””

You heard it here first.

Jawline moving make-up

Since the fake eyelids revelation freaked enough of you out.

Yes. It is real. You cover it with foundation.

Notice how the mandible itself (the true jaw) cannot be compressed at the corner edges, except with surgery.

Why I don’t trust “contour”. It’s old theatre make-up, literally it is, to look like another person.

This is, according to her, “a small face”. As you can see, still square.


In a natural square jaw (see Jolie or Grace Kelly for white ones) the corner of the “square” is lower than in other women.

A higher-set corner, smooth (less bone) and curved jaw sweeping down to the chin is feminine.

 

I’m scientifically, indisputably correct on that point.

 e.g.  

THAT is a gracile jaw.

Finally, the angle of the face is important. She naturally tucks her chin to recess her face’s sides in shadow behind hair but she actually has a recessed chin already. That’s unhealthy, causes double chins but culturally encouraged.

It’s strange how this is suggested once you’ve watched that.

Square-jawed Hollywood women get Botox to reduce the muscular prominence of their jaw.
http://capeaesthetics.co.za/2016/04/12/botox-for-bruxism/

So it isn’t like Asians are the only ones.

And plenty of “White” Jewish girls are still pushing the definition of natural into absurdity.

Very natural, quack quack on, bitch.

A hallmark of that eye surgery is that to appear more doe-eyed, the best the surgeon can do is make the eyes look more distant from one another. This requires more surgery to open them out again, giving them that sexy ET look.

Ew.

Video: Popular Asian make-up

80% paint (the thickness, it isn’t really makeup) and 20% filters is correct.

A sense of humour about it is healthy, the women who do that constantly, they’re like Asian chavs (chavs are known for thick, tacky makeup).

This is the webtoon mentioned in the comments.

https://th.webtoons.com/en/drama/truebeauty/list?title_no=1436&page=1

The similarity to chav makeup is pronounced.

All you need between these styles is more dark muddy colour on the brows and eyes and, instead of fake tan and bronzer, paler makeup with blush.

That’s literally it. All the face shape changing is the same: bigger eyes, thinner nose etc. except chavs naturally have some of this and accentuate it.

The details that look more European are: taping the face to look thinner and with a smoother jaw, the celebrities get liposuction there (yes, you can get lipo on the face), making the eyes larger and the overall head smaller, the whiteface makeup kinda obviously (yes, that is what it’s called) to neutralize the yellow tones, making a fake Euro nasal bridge out of medical wax (syphilitic women used to do that when their nose caved in!), celebrities can get implants for a fake nasal bridge, fake eyelids with surgical tape (that’s what it is), again, celebrities get surgery for permanent fakery, thick liner on the lid seems to increase eye height and eye prominence combined with plastic lashes, usually contacts are added, smaller mouth drawn on (like a doll, a Victorian doll, baby mouth – not sexy!!!).

It’s disturbing. I’d like to see an Asian man do this makeup.

When chavs do it, it’s bad enough.

Race-bending? Too cringe.

Why does China encourage this?

Well, taking over the world culturally requires a very specific push: making out like your women are the standard of beauty.

South Koreans usually innovate ways to achieve these deceptions first and that includes surgery.
It puts suggested videos like this into perspective.
Their skin is as real, natural and perfect as her lilac hair.

If you’ll believe that’s how she naturally looks, genetically, you’ll believe anything.

One of the top ways to spot the Asians who got White lid surgery? They look from many angles like Down’s syndrome eyes. I’m not saying it’s bad, I’m just saying it’s similar.

Proof:

See?  And that’s with the makeup. Lower is bare.
Told ya so. It’s the extreme tilt and excess, oddly formed skin including beneath the eye (the eyeball size doesn’t change!). It looks unusual.

To move the upper lid and make the area loose for a new lid, skin is pulled taut from the lower to make room in the skull’s hole. This causes the lower lid to drag and stick on the still Asian, large eyeball.

Personally, I find that a creepy tell because… why do that?

It’s your SKULL.

A sign of jaw “reduction” (it involves bone saws) is the chin looks about twice the volume it should (after reduction itself) because the teeth (look at a skull) are still very developed so vertically the face is trying to be oval but the masculine jutting is still prominent. There is no cherry chin fat (uncommon European trait) or line, typical in Europeans, it’s very flat.

They moved so much, it has to be!

The eyes look too small without makeup because the jaw used to add structure.

I don’t really need to comment on that. She’s considered a famous beauty “idol”.

Note the teeth too.

So instead of oval, the face looks long. Head tilting is a tell.

Chav v. Korean makeup, all that differs is texture and colour.

 

I wonder who one got surgery to look like. It’s like looking at a cartoon.

One has naturally large eyes, the other tries to look like that.

Look at the central third of the face. Moving it would damage the hearing so it looks way too flat because most of its natural shape has been excavated.

When they get even more work done, they look like a blow-up doll. Same model, obvious face-on.

Again, if you believe that’s genetic beauty, I have a range of unicorns to sell you.

Lips are overtly over filled (the border sucks).

Imitating a white nose with surgery, as here, makes it look chunky and blocky like a white man because the rest of the face doesn’t conform (especially the brow bones) as it would in a natural. The nostrils are still large for breathing, usually, so they look vaguely African (finer nasal bridge). Despite high cheekbones (you can get implants or smoothing), you can’t see the same structure in the rest of the face, because it isn’t natural. It never developed from anything genetic. At least contouring is done on the whole face.

I find the sex doll look disgusting so I’m pointing it out. Uncanny Valley.

Make-up is one thing, surgery to look like a sex toy is another.

Does this apply just to makeup and filters?

Hell yes, my friend. Yes, it does.

Chav v. makeup experiment up top, finished result:

I know fake when I see it.

East Asian beauty demands

https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/global-currents/unmasking-east-asias-beauty-ideals

With over 270 million monthly users, Chinese technology company Meitu is in the business of vanity. The company has several apps, but their most famous one is MeituPic – China’s number one photo retouching app. It gives users the ability to alter their appearance with surprising flexibility and specificity.

Yet what is most notable about Meitu Pic is its uniquely Asian features and filters. There are functions to smooth skin, slim the face, add makeup, attach cute stickers, and enlarge one’s eyes.

And change their eye shape, by rounding it out, there’s no other way to do that.

And you thought Snapchat was weird.

I’m starting to think the guys who claimed a lot of makeup was witchcraft might’ve been right. If you’re trying to look like a whole other person… something ain’t right in the head.

Similar to MeituPic, Japan’s Line Camera and South Korea’s Snow also offer facial enhancement features.

catfishing premium

While these selfie apps may differ in terms of functionality, they all help users to beautify themselves in ways that are telling about the markets they serve. They provide an interesting lens on how women in three East Asian countries view beauty ideals – and why certain beauty products succeed in an increasingly influential region…..

look more white has always been their ideal, prior to any contact with white people

paler women have higher oestrogen

thinner faces are more feminine (especially the curve of the jaw) and White women have mathematically thinner faces than Asians

There are studies.

recessed chin there, in case you wanted to know what that was called

nose is similar to African, which has slightly more flared nostrils

European nose is straighter, stronger bridge, pointed, nasal tip can point up

Do they mention this?

Heavens, no!

“Traditionally, East Asian women have been held to a standard of feminine beauty that suggests they should be sweet and gentle. “

Geisha were prostitutes, see other posts.

No.

They were hookers. Not just strippers, there is plenty of art depicting them rolling around with men, penis out.

If they weren’t hookers, nobody would have paid that much for tea. Why did men never learn such a respectable ceremony, hm? Nor would they be depicted with their genitals exposed, like a hooker.

Asian men are broader too, it’s a racial thing before you go there.

Oh, did you think these studies didn’t exist? Yeah, MSM never mentions them huh?
There is categorically less sexual dimorphism in Asians i.e. the men look more feminine, technically, and the women more masculine, since their range is closer in both cases to the androgynous mean.

Eyebrows also vary by race, Asians have that garish Audrey brow but naturally, softer. Flat as a ruler and pointing upward in surprise. Asian women do a lot to change this about their brows (normally by cropping the Shock Tail) because otherwise their eye shape looks more extreme (and alien to Western eyes).

Is this right? That isn’t the point, they do it.

This is the female mask, most beautiful of all races.

Which sex does that resemble to you? Now, which race?

Neither hips nor mathematics lie.

Koreans do though.

https://www.koreaboo.com/buzz/scientists-generated-perfect-faceand-looks-like-kim-tae-hee-irene/

You can’t use plastic surgery women in a study of natural (genetic) beauty. Don’t be absurd.

Europe used to be full of those women. This is a Louis Vuitton advert.

It was the ideal of beauty for millennia.

You don’t get to claim that because someone got creative with a scalpel.

Asians don’t have eyes like that. Stop embarrassing yourselves.

I find it suspicious that whenever Asians study beauty, the result is always pedomorphic. There is never any sexual maturity (sexual dimorphism + maturity) in the features, which must be a deliberate, false omission of: high cheekbones, but gracile jawline (rare combination), cherry chin (strong teeth), larger philtrum than men (see Marilyn), smooth but not baby nose, full but not huge mouth, soft brows, higher forehead than men.

They erase all the masculinized features of their own women, it’s unfair. That’s an unrealistic standard.

The method is completely wrong, the aim of the studies is to search for an adult model, a real model. It’s disturbing many of their supposed results could be in primary school.

Compare with similar high contrast (pale, dark hair) but sexually mature.

Please tell me you can see a difference. Only the sexual opinion of (non-pedophilic) normal men (within a race) counts for these types of study into NATURAL, ADULT FEMALE BEAUTY (not popularity, classic beauty). It’s been proven you can only really perceive accurately your own race best. Nudging it into other categories is…morally dubious. Is it right to expect an Asian woman to look European? Is it right to expect every Italian woman to resemble Monica?

Yet I know sexually who men would SELECT – and that’s the problem, Asian variations of this study are prone to emphasize surgery and popularity. It isn’t historical or evolutionary (therefore instantly wrong, you cannot study it without this context). This is Darwin, accept it or don’t pretend to study it.

Some Western studies make the same mistake, fixating on Hollywood (celebrity, popularity) like they’re the best looking people you’ll ever meet (they are not, travel, they are actually subpar even within their own races historically).

Back to Asians.

They choose the Asian-specific features and say that’s the ideal, of all times and periods. …No? It reminds me of fat acceptance. If that were true, they wouldn’t be getting quite so much surgery to resemble a mulatto, at best (philtrum reduction). Both women listed in the Korean article have entirely the wrong bone structure, it is impossible to change the eyes and they are the root of the face. Bad nose jobs aside (like Paris Hilton’s and many stupid women, they got them done too small) their faces are too broad to fit (a racial trait), their mouth is ghoulish (too broad, too wide and fat lipped, Asians shouldn’t get injections it makes their eyes look tiny) and the face is too flat looking since it’s difficult to add (structure) where there’s nothing there.

For comparison, since I’m not denying Asian women can get very good quality surgery, power to them for hoodwinking the stupid marks with a fetish, here is a woman who resembles their template better.

Wang Fei Fei, but she is Chinese so they instantly discount her. Asians hate other Asians.

The stellar example of surgical improvement I have ever seen is this woman.

Im Ji Hye

but she made it obvious with cleavage work so despite being Korean… they immediately discount her.

Again, who is beautiful in the sexual selection sense, little Miss Nine Year Old or Tits McGee?

Their children won’t look like this and it isn’t hard to guess who they’re trying to look like.

Here’s a morph of Asian celebrities (mostly actresses).

Not that they’re getting surgery at all, no. I’m sure Scarlett Johansson’s nose is untouched, like Angelina Jolie’s….

so this isn’t a racial thing but a natural beauty point. None of these bitches have it.

They must wear contacts, for example, to hide the dead-eyed stare. Like a serial killer.

Pic or it didn’t creep me out:

 

Same huge-breasted woman as above. Instant loss of two points imho once she stops appropriating white women’s eye colours (phenotype range is important to classification). I would be scared to encounter that in an alley, she reminds me of a sexbot. Her neutral there looks murderous. On the contrary, as you can see, getting fuckdoll surgery makes a woman look far less innocent.

The entire purpose in all those cases to purposefully get surgery is sexual enticement (one husband or lots of boyfriends, doesn’t matter).

The breast work just makes it obvious to foreigners.

The so-called perfect Asian face is based on a genetic lie (surgery).

Let’s look at method

One Korean researcher decided to apply Asian features through computer graphics on top of the mask layout, giving the results of the “perfect Asian face”.

No. That isn’t how the mask works, the data is already infused INTO the mask, which can be separated by RACE and SEX. He has essentially scribbled over the truth with only the positive features of surgical, trendy women he wants to fuck. Is that science?

When I say scribbled

I mean scribbled. And with the exclusions (so the whole thing is a sham), it fits white women better.

englishblonde

Yes, very Asian…..

The “perfect face” has an egg-shaped head, big bright eyes, a narrow and sharp nose, and medium-sized lips.

englishblonde2

Because the sampled women were all trying to look like THAT.

You can even see through the mask to the way it discounts Asian female features.

The Asian mouth is broader than the mask (mouth corners upturned, width remains constant), the Asian nostrils and nose are bigger than the mask, the Asian face size is bigger than the sketch and should be horizontally broader, the mask brows are lower and curved than the (cropped) Asian ones, the nasal tip and chin of the mask are more defined than the Asian girl, it’s all right there!

I hate noticing things, really. It’s such a burden.

Look at this horse-shit.

“Chinese herbalists have concocted special tinctures, tonics and elixirs for over 5,000 years to specifically address individual skin concerns. This knowledge has passed down from generation to generation and is what we use today to formulate many of our beauty concoctions,” Brian explains.

No, you’ve been giving them plastic surgery, developed in the West, not rubbing their face with tiger’s nuts. Next you’ll claim you invented pearls (Scotland’s had a roaring trade in them too before China stole cultivation methods in the last century).

http://blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscripts/2017/04/an-illustrated-old-english-herbal.html

Anglo-Saxons had herbalism too, you didn’t invent shit (you can’t take credit for inventing a fucking PLANT) but Cheryl Cole’s face is still pumped full of plastic shit. As it is, Europe has better biodiversity of plants and more (most) useful ones for skincare e.g. rosehip, lavender, orange blossom…

why lie?

As for Fan Bing Bing (what kinda name…) any woman who relies on eye makeup to get her eyes to look that beautiful way…, isn’t actually beautiful?

White example

Asian example

The problem with so much deep, structural surgery is that with less makeup, it looks Uncanny Valley.

If you’re going to go to such great lengths to look like us, be decent enough to admit it?

Artist’s “Asian” inspiration, now VS. Victorian Valentine, typical face.

Update: let’s throw this in, why not? re the philtrum and smaller mouth

http://buism.com/facebody.htm

 When it comes to the face there’s just one shape-shifter and that’s the entire mouth area (i.e. upper lip, lips, and chin). The mouth area is capable of articulating many, many distinct sounds. Just like frequently using the hands, frequently using the mouth results in a slender, lean, and petite mouth, including the upper lip and chin. Also like the hands, disusing the mouth produces a loose, flabby, and enlarged mouth area.

speaking better, being classier = more feminine mouth (small range possible, muscular on top of genetic)

The main muscle involved here is the one surrounding the lips, the orbicularis oris. If you’re trying to achieve a feminine face, I suggest speaking speak with great frequency and articulation. Not all languages are equal though—some neglect the orbicularis oris while others heavily rely on it. French, for example, seems to have a lot of words with the “oo” sound, like “beaucoup.”

dialect too

Many more muscles that attach to the orbicularis oris (mouth) and I believe they are all gender-neutral, or slightly favored by males. This is my conclusion after observing many faces and seeing little to no sexual dimorphism in this area. This is much like limbs, between the chest and fingers or between the butt and toes. They are not nearly as sexually-dimorphic as breasts are to a male chest, but the muscles seem to be slightly favored by males. So the updated picture now shows the orbicularis oculi and masseter muscles in opaque blue to denote that they are greatly favored by men.

but cheekbones are bone structure, literally

zygomatic arch

The final archetypal male and female faces.

                Unlike muscles of the body, some facial muscles aren’t attached to bone at all; some muscles are attached to other muscles. This means that tighter, more-developed muscles can pull on weaker muscles and facial organs. Tight midface muscles (in translucent blue) can enlarge the mouth area—including the base/wing of the nose—if the mouth muscles are weak. The average male partially uses some of the midface muscles and disuses/underuses the mouth muscles. Thus, the average male develops a wider mouth and nose than the average female.

well hold on the jaw is broader, larger and the lips thicken

The average female underuses the midface muscles and fully uses mouth muscles, which results in a pull towards the mouth. This produces a narrow nose, defined philtrum, small mouth, and narrow chin.

smooth nose (defined structure from bridge to tip), higher (length) or more well-shaped philtrum, rosebud lips and cherry chin

but philtrum especially is genetic in pronouncement and an indicator of fertility (men are under-studied)

The entire mouth area is large and loose for men and compact and tight for women.

This is not my opinion as you can see but plainly observable fact. Women have a longer philtrum and smaller mouth by breadth than men. Ah, some troll demands, wouldn’t we observe this in Marquardt’s masks?

We would.

That is the most feminine face humanly possible.

Hating make-up isn’t new

It’s old as the hills.

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A85852.0001.001/1:4?rgn=div1;view=fulltext;q1=Beauty%2C+Personal+–++Early+works+to+1800

“A discourse of auxiliary beauty. Or artificiall hansomenesse. In point of conscience between two ladies.”

Here, male authors try to “satirize” the conversation as happening between women.

To cover the fact they just don’t like it, when they don’t need to like it.

Get over it.

Not your woman? Not your problem.

If only the ancients had a term for this specifically, to tell prissy people like this to STFU.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_gustibus_non_est_disputandum

Uh…. yeah, they did.

Women are fussier about looks and presentation than men could ever be, that’s why we do so many things. If we’re allowed to impose preferences, men would never stop complaining about it.

They literally circlejerk the same question for millennia.

Why do women do it?

You answered your own question there, didn’t cha?

It isn’t as if it’s a modern trend or unrelated to health. They never say to stop cleaning your armpits or brushing your teeth or tweezing brows or using skin creams.

Do you think women like scruffy modern rapper lookalike men?

ruffian

The hideous shorts? The obnoxious deodorants and colognes that invade our personal space?

Madam,

I Am not more pleased to see you look so well, beyond what you were wont, than I am jealous (to be free with you) lest a per∣son so esteemed, as you are for modesty and piety, should use some colour or tincture to advance your Complexion; which indeed I take to be no better, than that odious and infamous way of Painting; every where in all ages so much, and so justly spoken a∣gainst both by God, and good men; being a most ungodly practise, though generally (as they say) now used in England (more or less) by persons of quality; who not con∣tent with Natures stock of Beauty, do (not by a fine, but filthy art) adde something to the advantage, as they think, of their Com∣plexions: but I fear, to the deforming of their souls, and defiling of their Consciences.

Men care so much because their visual systems are over-active, it’s nothing to do with women. Blaming us for breathing in your direction isn’t temptation, it’s personal weakness. We should be able to walk around looking feminine safely.

Either that or we dress like men and you still complain.

We can bring back public standards but men dropped the ball earlier and harder. No more PJs in public, no low-hanging jeans, bring back waistcoats and about five layers of stuff to pick up a pint of milk, fine. That’s fine by us.

When was the last time you wore silver collar stays?
Oh, and they have to be silver, you don’t want anyone to think you’ve “let yourself go” (see: America).

There’s no such thing as natural beauty, it’s a marketing con. Humans have pores, wrinkles, oil and sweat. I notice they never complain about deodorant, female menstrual and cleaning products, shampoo and conditioner, perfume or body sprays…. in other words, they’re fussy hypocrites. If they wanted a natural beauty, we’d be covered in so many reeking bodily fluids saturating a LOT of body hair that they would be able to smell us a mile off.

Gross? Yeah. Leave the beauty products alone, it isn’t for the sake of our own noses and eyes. It’s considerate.

Update: the title was too subtle. They hate it because women do it. That is the be-all and end-all on the subject. Anything women and women only do, they have a problem with. I’m sure it’s all a coincidence and they’re very conveniently principled against anything feminine. Methinks the “men” (mostly gay) protest too much?

I’m sure they don’t want women to drop all their feminine habits so they and their T of the LGBT fame can steal it and with it, the straight men they long for, the ultimate catch?

(Pay attention fools).

Ancient Romans wore lipstick, nobody gave a shit. Most pomades and other preparations are good for you (eyeliner was the ancient sunglasses, lead paint was SPF). There are ancient men discovered wearing hair gel. We may or may not personally like it (tastes differ) but we don’t tell you to stop it or stop selling it. That’s called respect for men. If you want to look that way, on your head be it.