Fake Christians are weak

https://pjmedia.com/faith/josh-harris-kisses-christianity-goodbye/

Slut abandons faith, shocker.

Born-agains are liars.

Trust no slut.

Jeremiah 13:23

But there is little hope for you ever doing good, you who are so accustomed to doing evil. Can an Ethiopian change the color of his skin? Can a leopard remove its spots?
Can a fake K-type un-atrophy his amygdala and un-STD his peen?

We don’t kill apostates but isolation and mockery is worse for a narcissist.

They ruin any marriage they’re in, even with a Saint they’d be trying to change them (usually sexually).

It’s like these low IQ manwhores are applying magic dirt to morality and the fruits of a holy life.

Standing in a stable don’t make you a horse.

Standing in a Church won’t give you the good life, you cannot have it all.

Wolf in sheep’s clothing, if you’re there for selfish reasons, God sees your heart and you shall FAIL.

Knowing the irony of these things, probably via the divorce you avoided marrying a fellow slut for. Pretty sure divorce risk goes up higher with more divorced sexual attitudes (sodomy etc) than it would go down for marrying a Christian like they’re your cuckoo egg cover. Marrying one doesn’t expunge your own sins. Why do Americans engage in these non sequiturs? If you wrong a Christian spouse (say by coercing them into sodomy, opposing their very existence and oppressing the reason you married them for), they’ll be more likely to divorce you, if anything. I’m sure sexual depravity is a major reason Christian women divorce. If a husband doesn’t serve God, he serves Satan. It becomes imperative to divorce such a monster.

There is no debt forgiveness for the wages of sin.

I want a divorce rate study on male and female Born-Again CHINOs.

We already know most divorces are from re-marriages.

And cuck Christians won’t attract any woman worth her salt.

Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

There’s no such thing as a tease

It’s a porn lie. They’re selling you the idea of sexually forward women.

Or Hollywood Lolita pedo bullshit.

A ‘tease’ is what creeps say to attractive women who existed in their vicinity.

You are not entitled to sex. There’s no coy, they’re just not interested. In studies, these types of men have been proven to assume sexual interest from women where there was none, deluding themselves. Nobody is leading them on, but you have to humour the crazy to get away. Picture it like a hoodie approaching you asking for something. Be nice and get away.
They are being civilized, women are conditioned to smile, it’s polite.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/az1w3j/do_you_hate_it_when_women_on_the_streets_smile_at/

They’re such cowards they’ll literally body slam a woman, the weaker sex.
Literal assault.
You’re angry with men? Pick on your own sex.
But if they continue to physically assault women walking in public, they’ll get plenty of ‘sex’ in prison.

Things that make women evil, according to incels:

being female
(being male, too)
being male and looking female
being ambiguously male or female
looking at them
not looking at them
smiling at them
not smiling at them
being fat
being thin
being tall
being short
being smart
being dumb
being scientific
not being scientific
being soldiers
not being soldiers
being mothers
not being mothers
being wives
being single
being Christian
being atheist
having sex
not having sex
make-up
no make-up
fake nails
natural nails
expensive hairdo
crap hairdo
dressing feminine
not dressing feminine
curves
no curves
caring what men think
not caring what men think
having opinions
not having opinions
working hard
being lazy
voting
not voting
paying taxes
not paying taxes
having a job
being on welfare
being a boss
being married to a boss
paying for their own meal
not paying for their own meal
attention-whoring
avoiding them
oppressing them with relationships
not oppressing them with relationships
having kids, with anyone
having no kids, with anyone
race-mixing
not race-mixing
showing skin
wearing long skirts
posting bikini shots
not posting bikini shots
flirting randomly
not flirting
being clingy
being a cold-hearted bitch
getting emotional
having none of the feels

Need I go on? Clearly, women are not the problem.

Near the end of that long, long list:

killing your kids
making them pay child support
reporting rape
not reporting rape
being murdered
being alive

Maybe they just have anger issues? They are the most triggered people ALIVE.
Offended by literally anything.

But it isn’t misogyny!

They don’t HATE women, they just want single wives who are whorish virgins with all and no sexual XP, fertile but not too much, exactly the religious they are, a domestic slave that doesn’t need to be paid or sleep or work or clean or tend to babies while homesteading and living in the city because of the bars, with magical gravity defying tiddies despite breastfeeding at least 12 babies, all vaginal deliveries with no complications, tearing or stretch marks.

See? Totally reasonable.

She also never has periods (but fertile) and manages to keep a perfect figure, even throughout pregnancy and lactation.

It isn’t women they hate, just women who don’t live up to their standard, which totally existed in the ambiguous Past in the vague Culture they keep talking about [citation needed].

Because beggars can indeed be choosers and they choose the best.

Women are obviously entitled snowflakes who project because men are flawless and never wrong, that’s why their death rate is high, drug abuse is high, crime is high, mental problems are high and IQs are globally tanked.

The politics of all these wonderful male politicians has given us such a peaceful, logical society.

Women: exist
Incels: …bitch

Women are so IRRATIONAL, AREN’T THEY?

Yet another exciting round of ‘why everything is women’s fault even though men are statistically in charge’.

It’s like atheists with Christians but sex-specific, which isn’t even a choice.

What kind of Satanism is this? They must be operating from a spiritual void, but which one?

Don’t tread on me means don’t tell me to fucking smile, it’s weird. Nobody finds a man that insecure about a stranger’s facial expression charming.

Women are striking, you just don’t see it.

No future? Fine, no bother.

If men don’t wanna get married, the motivation for women giving a single shit what they “think” flutters out the window, drops and dies on the pavement.

If that were true, women would be having less sex than older generations at the same age. Check.

Women would be less likely to report as feminists? Check.

Women would be voting Brexit and Trump. Check.

Women would be focusing on career since men won’t be the provider? Check.

Women would be insulting men who refuse their gender role. Check.

Women wouldn’t sleep around because there’s nothing in it. Check.

All the damn checks. And you know the worst part?

They’re briefed on terrorists

Motive doesn’t matter. Public attacks matter.

https://www.rt.com/usa/462475-incels-threat-air-force-briefing/

They know something.

Wide scale plans online?

Whether the excuse was sex-based or not, incitement to attack random civilians is totally their purview.

So-called incels are not actually virgins and most virgins are happy about their lot. Incels aren’t getting as much sex (or rape) as they feel entitled to. You don’t have to be a virgin to be “incel”, stop.

comment

It shows you how soft people have become to blame others for their own mental illness.

Misogynists project their shadow onto women then try to destroy women. Doesn’t work. They screech like banshees and wonder why all men avoid them too. There’s no AA for sex, as uncabob said, try being attractive. Firstly, don’t be an abuser. These low IQ degenerates existed since the time of Bluebeard.

Their language is infantile aversion. Female? Female what? Smurf?

Scared of the mere word woman, bloody snowflakes.

If you keep threatening to kill the majority of a white population, a powerpoint is warranted.

comment

It’s all the woman’s fault. They have no respect for men. They destroy what they allegedly love. Sad, actually. Sad for men.

You don’t deserve respect for having a dick. You earn it.

We don’t love you, lazybones. Women are not your mother.

reply

No jobs, no prospects and then they blame women for not wanting to go out with them. Why don’t the Incels get mad at the economy instead?

That would require responsibility.

Growing up.

It’s sexist to ask Peter Pan to act his age.

Your death bed can’t hear excuses.

reply by a gamma

Men and women are not equal, they differ by a chromosome. Plus the argument that men should empathize with women because they are also human beings is rubbish.

Men are mutant women, have lower IQ and more criminals.

If we’re going red pill to oppress anyone, really wanna go there?

Thinks women aren’t human, wonders why they don’t love him.

You couldn’t make it up.

This is the fruit of child centred parenting.

The rotten, rotten fruit.

They’re so busy swallowing their own bullshit you’d think they were doing porn.

[citation needed] for every sweeping statement you can’t call them on

Like, female brain types exhibit cognitive benefits, they’re not even wrong.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/

Men have so many neurological pathologies precisely because of their mutant brain.

gamma 2

Thereby admitting that women are after our money?

What money? You’re an overgrown baby.

These guys needed to be bullied as a child. Severely. You can only beat out that level of stupidity.

reply by the sane

Sure they are. How else are you going to support the 4 children that you are all planning to have? This is all about your genes making it into the next generation – do you expect women to pay for you?

Their gender role, exactly.

This is not about survival, let’s be serious. It’s about luxury.

Not wanting to starve with a loser’s baby is a luxury!

This is why most men in history weren’t allowed to breed.

sane person

Well, even the male bird has to build the nest for the female bird to get interested in mating with him. That is what babies require.

No, but Incels want a family of their own with little chilblains.

Men are not entitled to female fertility, only rapists think so. They could adopt or hire a surrogate but they don’t want to spend any time with their own child raising it, let alone the “easy” work of being a full-time single parent on a huuuuuge welfare check. Narcissists shouldn’t breed.

What woman wouldn’t want them. In their life. Forever.

You are a woman I see. It is women like you that cause men distress.

Snowflakes.

Men built the world you live in, wimmin contributled eff all

Wrong and note, they themselves, also men, are useless eaters on other men (and women).

Women contributed children and so, everything men did.

Alexander the Great was only great because of his mother, read a book.

lucid commentator

Maybe weak men with weak psyche’s…

Men weak in character blame all but themselves. Since they can never be women, that’s the easy target.

The old term is wastrel.

Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

Video: A critique of more PUA bitch fights

More drama?

MORE?

Is drama how they make money at this point?

[They are painfully middle-class. God forbid we turn a child of divorce down!]

“The world is a complicated place”.

Looking at the world but never actually at themselves, just surface level stuff.

He’s spot on.

“They depend on this degenerate society”.

They lie about rape law blatantly, I’ve compared their claims to it.

Accusations are presumed true when there was sexual contact. Having sex is something adults do, if you’re not mature enough for consequences, don’t.

It’s ghetto romance for non-blacks. It’s ultimately high time preference and thus, destructive in the long run.

They have their own SATC Have It All mythos including somehow not disgusting a virgin enough to marry her.

They’re not against birth control…”

That tells you all you need to know. It’s the trad test.

Unmarried people shouldn’t get contraception, why do you need it?

[Medical conditions are uncommon].

Also, assuming all women are on the Pill is stupid, no wonder they get women pregnant that way. Would they talk to a girl if they knew she wasn’t on it? Doubtful.

You can’t reduce the abortion rate while the Pill is used as the sole contraceptive for those women, it fails all the time statistically.

The “player” burnout and rising drug-resistant ST disease alone show it’s bad for the individual men. Live a lifelong orgy like a gay man, get all the same medical issues. Wages of sin. They also visit hookers (encourage it!) but don’t think of HIV risk nor STD-caused birth defects if they do conceive a child. For the vain, they aren’t told STDs ruin your looks.

Like your gravestone will include a notch count and future generations (hell, Gen Z) won’t be repulsed. I like to think men are worth more than their depth of depravity. They encourage men to take porn-star level risks with their health by having bareback anal. Yep, can you tell there’s a gay influence? But gay sex preference doesn’t make them gay, apparently….

They seem to many just competitive sex addicts or compulsive liars who need to feel a sense of online belonging to deal with childhood-rooted emotional abandonment issues.

Generally, they’re exploiting their own sex (they believe in muh 4 hour work week*, come on!) while complaining when other men and women do the same. Surely it’s don’t hate the player, hate the game? The SJWs are working in the same society they have a ‘blogging’ job in.

However, many PUAs as clients or readers are non-whites trying to use and abuse white women, this sexual terrorism angle makes a lot more sense.

Including why it doesn’t work.

They actually don’t believe in leagues.

The guys calling themselves alpha – not a league, apparently!

*The guy had rich parents and went to a brat school. He’s not average.

Sexual Jedi larping. When they can multiple orgasm as dudes, they might be worth listening to.

comment

If PUA’s put as much effort into improving their lives as they do improving their notch counts, they would be rich and happy men.

Bold to assume they don’t have mental issues.

Have you read their rape fantasies? (Obviously such a person could never be a rapist).