the tradlarping ego trip paradox

The women most likely to eschew all men (in postmodern culture) and generally mortal male authority are devout Christian women. I’ve been called a misandrist online for refusing to recognise any mortal man’s moral authority short of Jesus. When you can walk on water dude, I’ll listen. They seem to think muh Bible is a magical thinking excuse to get their own way with any woman or argument when that’s silly.
Meanwhile, the tradwife larping women are using the man to furnish their lifestyle and fame; a male, prideful trait. They’re fake feminine, biding their time until he dies or she leaves him. Nobody discusses how to separate the two.

From experience and of those I know, women just outright rejecting men (because ew, whoredom) are met with confusion at best, ridicule (‘you’re missing out….’ – yeah on your STDs, good?) commonly and called lesbians or, ironically, whores at worst (the latter by misogynists). You see, weak men are only nice to women they might sleep with, that’s pushed a lot of women into thot culture to follow male praise, which in all past times was a moral motive. The power of the world is in the tongue. If men want a pure culture, shame sluts and praise ‘prude’s. Nothing less works. Doing the first half but only if they won’t sleep with you specifically won’t work. The move to male purity in nofap terrorises the Marxists, threatening their mental power over men.

In addition, men get to propose but unions are planned by women, virgins want other virgins and since sperm is always cheap, r-men don’t get to buy their way into a k-select breeding pool. This is why out-breeding libertarian rice cookers couldn’t get a good white woman and had to settle, like mudsharks do. Even Weinstein with all his power and money had to BEG women, and those were actual whores. Reality bites. Men are not the peahens choosing but the peacocks competing to BE chosen. Why fear it? To wish to choose as a male is effeminate. This is why gay men can be pedants e.g. fashion and shrews e.g. parades of activism, cancel culture and ‘representation’. This is why k-women hate players, like a physical visceral disgust. They think like a woman. They played themselves. By becoming hotter to sluts (r-women) they’re closing off the trad life they mistakenly imagine they can retcon back to. Nobody is universally attractive. It’s a cope. K-women embrace the fact slutty men will mock and degrade their choices (ad nauseum, while also denying pure women exist…) but degenerate men are only beginning to experience the same ridicule in K-shift as the tide turns and there’s no born-again virgin, since virginity is medical/biological. Jesus didn’t mention virginity, of the body, but the spirit cleansing, the Holy Spirit. It doesn’t undo what was done, any more than un-severing a limb. Jesus won’t even cause your mutilated foreskin to grow back, what of pair bonding in the brain? Why still seek after flesh like a rutting beast when as a new Christian, bedding women is a lecherous thought? These guys practice occult ritual scarification of the penis (jelqing), which causes ED and other impotence problems in getting it up.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sun-men/9182717/dangerous-jelqing-trend-penis-longer/

Tearing the manhood, how satanic. If tugging worked, teen boys would be dragging it on the ground. Israel is creating customers, I see. Look at Viagra users per country, israel and USA are top, also in circumcision. With the latter waning as parents love their sons, propaganda must be made to make white men self-harm. At least, until refusing to cut the manhood in partial castration to sell the tissue for face filler (fibroblasts) can be spun as anti-Semitic and/or Islamophobic.

In other words, trying to make your functioning penis bigger can result in damaging it so much that it no longer functions as a sexual organ.

It’s thought that around 40 per cent of 40-year-old men have some degree of ED, and that number goes up with age (50 per cent at 50, etc).

But tugging on your member repeatedly also damages those blood vessels – meaning that you could struggle to get or maintain an erection even if you are young and healthy…….

It’s like a plot from Idiocracy. You are the dysgenic threat.

The paper Ks can’t fake their way into the club, God knows your impure heart.

A lot of r-men will leave the gene pool by vasectomy (good), some by self-harm (inc. STD sterilization) but many more by being choosy beggars.

Your penis can actually shrink as the years pass by.

God said to go forth and multiply, not dilly dally wasting your youth. Sperm ages like milk, see paternal age studies.

the low oxygen level causes some muscle cells to lose their flexibility and gradually change into something akin to scar tissue,”

same happens to nuns with age, women should masturbate if they plan to marry and give birth at some point, it’s in gynecology textbooks how the vagina can atrophy

Meanwhile, non-virgin men seeking virgin women have already failed a basic spiritual test, who wants their kids to have slut genes of either sex? Then why wait for that, what’s the point? Why not settle with the richest slutty man, in that case? By their own paradigm, it makes no sense. The pair bonding is already impaired. Shutting your legs later on is closing the door after the horse has bolted. May as well go with an actively slutty man with power, surely? None of their rationalisations are consistent to logic or reality.

The degenerate men are going to be really angry when they find out Hollywood lied to them (fiction, duh?) about what women really prize (not the aged player with the herp and autist sperm) because while there’s two types of women, they match up to two types of men.

Self-improvement special snowflake dudebro cult

A life coach is a priest with none of the insight. Like Oprah, they tell men to be self-involved, self-indulgent Carrie from SATC types. I caught some clips of that show as a kid (where she was ranting about her shit problems and non-life) and I was confused, since here we associate friend group cults (“cliques”) and binge drinking, sleeping around pointlessly with the men, it’s considered a uniquely male weakness. Apparently America was pushing it as feminine, which never worked. Our lad culture goes back many ruined generations.

Anyway, onto the topic at hand. I don’t think men realise what losers some of them have willfully become. The concept of dishonour must come back, whether they’re perma-single or not. Soyboy and pajama boy is trying to paint exceptions for some ruined men based on tradlarp-type signalling…. no? This doesn’t work. Women perceive the sociology naturally. These ‘men’ don’t see how boring they are, like male versions of Cringe Carrie.

Just watch TOWIE to see how it’s all failed men, culturally. Masculinity = Degeneracy.

Generally:

We might be individual, but we’re not special. We’re all human so nobody is special. Individuals are rare because most people have no personality, they’re bland conformists, copycats of the rare individuals. They waffle on and whine about their dull little lives and their mundane baseless “philosophies” as if they’re Kant himself. They have no wit, not even sufficient to see how absurd they are. They are lost boys, stuck in teenage 60s marketing notions of rebellion for the rest of their sad little lives. They drive anyone with half a brain away and all their friends have nothing to talk about to one another. All you hear is a mindless repetition of ‘current events’. Over the years, they grow apart or pick up other vices to have in common. They’re base minds. There’s nothing to make of them, there is no treasure and they keep seeking within but the narcissist is hollow. They’ll die, before they find it. A self is made through struggle and self-awareness, two things the child-mind flees.. Navel-gazing is not the same. They spend money on all the silly bro trends and complain they haven’t any. They’re self-indulgent parenting their inner child. They flee duty of all kinds, even a commitment to ‘beloved’ pets, whom they dump frequently on people or in a shelter (alone, scared) to go on debauched ‘holidays’. This is the peak, this is the best their lives will ever be and they sense it. They know their low ways will ruin them one day, soon and the concept of masculine responsibility they reject as oppression. They do not love, they cannot love. Pair bonding is sneered at, like the autist also. They are shells instead of men. Disloyal dilettantes to any proclaimed cause, complete with bitchy, pointless in-fighting. Do not think you can help the husk, they decorate their bodies like a preening rat in a lab. Otherwise, who would listen?
There’s nothing there, there’s no one in there.
They’re nothing. Walking, talking nothing.
If you see it, they’ll hate you. Secretly, they hate everyone, especially if they’re happy.

They’re solipsists in practice, utterly dead inside.

It’s a generation of lost boys. However, they deserve it. They’re actually hedonists.

They’re slowly all realising they’ll never all be Tony Stark/ Bruce Wayne/ a rapper, whatever. They have a feeble, regressed sense of potential. They think they’re still fifteen. They actually think, as adults, that “one day” they’ll ‘grow up’ and become a superhero. It’s magical thinking, delusions of grandeur. They’re actually crazy.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/03/half-of-millennials-think-theyll-be-rich-data-says-otherwise.html

Millennials are less wealthy than most previous generations were at the same age, the report finds, which doesn’t bode well for their chances of becoming millionaires, especially since many of them are also skittish about investing.

They’re going on their retirement holidays NOW.

This is it, peak degenerate.

Binge-drinking, yoga, “not like the other guys”.

Still, lots of young people remain confident, the TD Ameritrade survey found. Over 70% of millennial men say they will be millionaires at some point, while 38% of millennial women report being similarly optimistic.

They’re delaying their life – marriage, kids, anything, and they’ll just – delay, forever.

The One-day generation. They’ll die having never lived.

Over 70% of those men.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/millennials-are-delusional-about-how-rich-theyre-going-to-be-2018-12-06

And a survey released earlier this year from TD Ameritrade that found that more than half of millennials expect to be millionaires in their lifetimes, with more than four in 10 saying it’ll happen by 50.

NAMALT duh, we know. If you aren’t triggered like a dudebro, I know. Again, self-awareness.

But she explains that millennials in particular “have incredibly powerful new belief systems about not capping how much money can be earned” as “there are so many careers that were nonexistent even 10 years ago” — which may help explain why they think seven figures is possible.

Still, if women had delusions of Fairy Godmother, you would’ve definitely heard about it by now.

Income relies on IQ and most low IQ people are men. They are in for a shock.

Anyone who claims to care about ‘the future of men’ would address this. It’s pleasure island except they’ll just turn into asses. That’s the end.

They don’t love.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larissafaw/2015/07/28/watch-out-ladies-millennial-men-are-gold-diggers/

They are the very gold diggers they complain about. Classic narc projection.

 Two in 10 single adults can be classified as “gold diggers” saying that they would marry somebody for their money, according to DDB’s Life Style Study. And 54% of these gold diggers are men. And young. Whereas gold digger women are more likely to be part of the boomer generation (40% are female vs. 27% male), gold digger males are significantly more likely to be part of the Millennial generation (40% are male vs. 25% female).

Sperm is cheap, guys.

Men are just lazy. Thank God I’m not American. They’re not men, they’re males. Man up?

That phrase alone –

they are so weak, they refuse to call women, women. Broflakes. Useless broflakes.

Hell, just GROW up. Women aren’t going to rescue you, that has never happened in history. Men are not damsels. I dunno, get a sex change?

Thoughts on fence-sitters

https://babylonbee.com/news/famed-archaeology-professor-resigns-after-several-photos-surface-of-him-in-nazi-uniforms

I was thinking. Here’s a fusion of Bible and science. 3800 words. Skip to bold if lazy.

Having no protective instinct for your kin is a woeful excuse for cowardice. I keep seeing it in American men and I’ve no skin in that game so it’s objective. I’ve noticed it’s trendy for men to SIGNAL conservative (a virtue signal to K values) but also throw various in-group under the bus (e.g. white mothers = Karen), usually for existing.

With friends like that….

It’s getting really grim and they deserve their own suffering, as the Bible stipulates.
Who are we to intervene? If we could? (We cannot).

Deut 28:15…

“But it shall come about, if you do not obey the Lord your God, to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes with which I charge you today, that all these curses will come upon you and overtake you: “Cursed shall you be in the city, and cursed shall you be in the country.”

Deut 31:17

Then My anger will be kindled against them in that day, and I will forsake them and hide My face from them, and they will be consumed, and many evils and troubles will come upon them

If you are unholy, you deserve to suffer. Suck it up. Man up.

From Prov 1, God is laughing at you

Because I called and you refused,
I stretched out my hand and no one paid attention;
And you neglected all my counsel
And did not want my reproof;
I will also laugh at your calamity;
I will mock when your dread comes

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reproof

You’re supposed to be criticized.

And men are supposed to police one another, women only chastise (from chaste, a virtue) when men have failed to be men.

1 Samuel 3:13

For I have told him that I am about to judge his house forever for the iniquity which he knew, because his sons brought a curse on themselves and he did not rebuke them.

But they claim to slag off actual Christians (some of which are evil whitey and evil woman*) using a book that expressly condemns them?

Let them alone; they are blind guides of the blind. And if a blind man guides a blind man, both will fall into a pit” – Matthew 15

Leave them alone, God said. Let them suffer. Let them be dumb. Let them fail, it’s God’s will. Don’t go simping for the anti-social.

Matthew 25 “The foolish said to the prudent, ‘Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.’ But the prudent answered, ‘No, there will not be enough for us and you too; go instead to the dealers and buy some for yourselves.’”

They’re parasites.

Isaiah 65:12

I will destine you for the sword,
And all of you will bow down to the slaughter.
Because I called, but you did not answer;
I spoke, but you did not hear.
And you did evil in My sight
And chose that in which I did not delight.

You can’t appeal to the authority of the Bible if you read it? Did they read it?

Stop meddling in others’ morality and check yourself.

Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use?” Rom 9:21

You are responsible for YOUR soul. Derailing to others’ is a weakness.

They’re even pushing Muslim rhetoric about *supposed The Woman Question. How stupid can you get? With no white women (whom they truly reference), the race is dead, numbnuts. That’s what the SJWs openly want, along with certain religions. If you don’t know any good white women, it sounds like you’re the problem? Why don’t they want to be around you? Note how the Muslims trolling on those ‘right wing’ pages, pretending to be white goys, are also pushing them into the very Marxism they claim to oppose e.g. largely cultural, an abortion and STD clinic on every corner. Like no, you’re not edgy, that’s all 100% mainstream, you cannot hate white women and girls more than the people literally rape slaving them under your noses and calling you effeminate cowards for letting it happen. Kin before ‘gender’. If you don’t care about your kin, you’re not conservative. These fake Ks want an excuse to be globalist, why? Just leave the West instead of whining every day for years, who will stop you? We won’t miss you, while you always, coincidentally, side with the oppressors, as true r-strategists. I’m losing patience with them, something might have to be done. They lack in basic literacy and common sense. What did Muslims do historically to men of lands they enslaved? Castrated them. Can’t say they wouldn’t deserve it, for allowing their kin to be raped, Bible is clear about “I will give you over to foreigners if you disobey” proclamations and “love her because she is a woman” rules.

It’s love thy neighbour as thyself, love your close kin, protect them, respect them, honour them, not throw them under the bus to foreigners with a different religion to signal how ‘independent, fish bicycle’ macho bravado man you are.

https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/1%20Peter%203%3A7

They just want an excuse to be cowards, cucks and traitors. Damn the fence-sitters.

Who’d be dumb enough to believe gib promises from people who come from countries with retarded IQs that can barely feed themselves?

And if it’s “men r so special” – not really, most infant deaths are male because the genome is weaker, Natural Selection culls men (earlier mortality, more accidents from low IQ etc). How are women meant to alter your IQ exactly? I’m all ears.

https://www.medindia.net/news/infant-mortality-rates-higher-among-boys-than-girls-study-34597-1.htm

An analysis of infant mortality in 15 developed countries found that baby boys are 24 percent more likely to die than baby girls.

This is down from a peak of 31 percent in 1970, but double the rate in the days before the development of vaccines and public health measures like improved sanitation dramatically improved infant mortality rates.

Men are the mutants of the species. If women were – no species, we’d go extinct. I get a vibe of hard cope from a sizeable segment of low IQ multicultural r-guys who thought they’d be Brad Pitt one day, a little like our version of India’s angry single men.

“As infant mortality falls to very low levels, infant deaths become increasingly concentrated among those who are born with some weakness.”

Genetically, men are the weaker sex.

The male disadvantage begins in utero…..

it continues

When poor sanitation and nutrition weakened all babies and mothers the male disadvantage was less noticeable: from 1751 until 1870 the gender mortality gap was about 10 to 15 percent.

Medicine has allowed weak men to survive

we all knew already, soyboys were saved by medicine

The gender gap rose steadily as infant mortality rates plummeted and only began to reverse with the increased use caesarean sections and improvements in neonatal care.

by God’s design, they should’ve been dead

“Changes in obstetrical practice and neonatal medicine that saved all but the weakest babies have benefited boys more than girls because boys were more vulnerable across the entire range of birth weights,” the authors concluded.

“In addition to changes in delivery practices, improvements in neonatal intensive care also may have benefited males more than females.”

we owe them nothing

A third times more likely to die from infant syphilis, for instance

60 v. 93 per 100k (f/m)

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-death-rates-by-cause-by-sex?country=~Syphilis

so where do they get the idea of being God’s favourite?

It has no data, they die younger and have lower average IQs, so is it the Bible?

but… God doesn’t actually like men. Genesis:

Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. The Lord was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. The Lord said, “I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land, from man to animals to creeping things and to birds of the sky; for I am sorry that I have made them.”

So if we’re arguing God hates either sex, it’d be the one who was 100% in charge during all the evil, wouldn’t it?

He literally wants to kill those guys.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=proverbs+1%3A27-32&version=NIV

when calamity overtakes you like a storm,
    when disaster sweeps over you like a whirlwind,
    when distress and trouble overwhelm you.

Then they will call to me but I will not answer;
they will look for me but will not find me,
since they hated knowledge
and did not choose to fear the Lord.
Since they would not accept my advice
and spurned my rebuke,
they will eat the fruit of their ways
and be filled with the fruit of their schemes.
For the waywardness of the simple will kill them,
and the complacency of fools will destroy them;

You deserved this. It’s right there. You wanna be a reprobate, this is what happens. What have your fellow mortals, men or women both, got to do with divine justice? Are we supposed to pray for you?

“As for you, do not pray for this people, and do not lift up cry or prayer for them, and do not intercede with Me; for I do not hear you” Jer 7:16

God does reject people, after they reject Him.

Jeremiah 6:30
They call them rejected silver,
Because the Lord has rejected them.

If society sucks, the Bible is abundantly clear that men are responsible. You lost moral authority and God is punishing you, not women. We find it funny Americans say they oppose the Sexual Revolution while encouraging strip clubs and their own daughters to join ‘legal’ brothels. Is that a Christian nation, really?

Women are meant to fear GOD. Not you guys. You’re mortal. You’re not Jesus. Most of you can’t put the porn down for a week. Remove the offending ‘limb’, Jesus said. Respect is earned. What do you do, that makes fellow men and women respect you? Usually crickets ensue after asking.

I get the feeling we’ve been flooded with Cluster B men recently, complete with “splitting” and delusions of revenge fantasy, it feels very Elliot Rodger, dunnit?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)

There’s literally something mentally wrong with them. They’re spiteful mutants who implode any group dumb enough to accept them. They did it with atheistkult. Do we not have standards? Basic moral standards? Not being a literal raging hypocrite? All Cluster B men do is derail with pity parties about how much of a loser they are and Someone Else must fix it or be “punished”. Very just world fallacy crap, male brand hypoagency. I think a fair standard is not blaming others for your own inability to grow up. I expected such entryism (fake Ks). We should reject these guys, they’re worthless to any First World civilization, actively anti-social, they’re just picking on women as the weaker sex for now so the men are weakened (family ties, borderlines love to split them up, attacking women first as the weaker sex).

Splitting is a relatively common defense mechanism for people with borderline personality disorder.[7] One of the DSM IV-TR criteria for this disorder is a description of splitting: “a pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation“.[10][11] In psychoanalytic theory, people with borderline personality disorder are not able to integrate the good and bad images of both self and others, resulting in a bad representation which dominates the good representation.[12]

Those people shouldn’t breed! Nobody is entitled to pass on their genes, yet only r-types feel that way. Sexual Selection is supposed to deny the genetics of entitled borderlines, histrionic personalities etc. Many of the undiagnosed cluster Bs are male, statistically. 

Borderline Personality Disorder in Men: A Common Co-Occurring Disorder

Characterized by pervasive mood instability, difficulty with interpersonal relationships, negative self-image and harmful behavior, borderline personality disorder in men (BPD) is a serious mental illness.

We’re not your shrink, we’re not here for any one guy subjectively but they keep treating discussions of societal issues like a personal therapy session, classic cluster B characteristic. Like STFU so the grown-ups can talk?

Borderline personality disorder is characterized by:

  • Intense bouts of anger, depression or anxiety that last hours to days long
  • Episodes of impulsive aggression, self-injury or drug or alcohol abuse
  • Distorted thoughts and negative sense of self
  • Frequent and impulsive changes in life-altering decisions
  • Highly unstable patterns of social relationships
  • High sensitivity to rejection
  • Impulsive behaviors like excessive spending, risky sex and binge eating

It is common to see borderline personality disorder occur with other psychiatric problems, particularly bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, substance abuse and other personality disorders.

I see no way they could ever impair our optics. /s We shouldn’t pick up defects. We’re not SJWs, we don’t need it. They drag every group down, we’re just the latest.

There’s also a huge persecution and victim complex, with paradoxical claims e.g. women are stupid vs. women are ruling over us – pick ONE, moron.

Another is “women don’t have enough kids” vs. “I don’t need to have kids”. It takes two. You not having kids means roughly one woman in your group cannot, so it’s an actual loss of TWO or more (just at replacement rate). Maths is hard, huh?

See if this seems familiar.

A series of intense but stormy relationships is often the first thing people notice about a man with BPD. He will fall in love quickly and can fall out of love just as fast.

They don’t feel love, then. In-lust isn’t love.

Similarly, in a friendship or family relationship, when he has been offended, he immediately stops all contact with that person and cuts them out of his life in anger. He is notorious for holding grudges.

Yep.

Part of joining forum cults is avoiding outrage in the echo chamber. They’re dysfunctional.

A man with BPD may harm people and bring excessive emotion and drama to relationships, but deep down he usually doesn’t want to hurt people; he just wants to be loved and is desperate for it. Men with BPD appear needy and manipulative, but they are desperately seeking to feel love they’ve never felt before.

Depends if co-occurs with HPD, NPD, ASPD, etc. And being abusive isn’t excusable, everyone wants love. Borderlines want a secured victim to love them “unconditionally” (even when being abused). That isn’t love. They don’t know what love is. They think abusing someone = love, they SHOULD die alone.

When symptomatic, a man with BPD is walking around in a living hell and perceived as universally hostile. He walks around with incredible inner pain, depression and free-floating anxiety.

“universally hostile” a hell of the reprobate’s own making

Dependent, dramatic and highly manipulative, BPD sufferers have learned to cope in these dysfunctional ways due to the overwhelming fear and emotional pain they endure. The emotional instability coupled with impulsivity places these individuals at risk of drug or alcohol abuse.

There’s also an element of Boomer-like denial of aging (I know not all Boomers). BPD is close to NPD so they have a fragile ego and self-worth, aging suggests they might be abandoned, BPD’s greatest fear.

The guys who claim they’ll get divorced before they even meet their future wife – it’s a BPD sign.

If you knew you were going to abuse your spouse, you’d know you were gonna get divorced before you met them.

Women are diagnosed with BPD at a ratio of 3-to-1 to men. However, in general, population studies, the occurrence rates are evenly distributed. While it is true that statistically more women than men are diagnosed with BPD, there are reasons for the statistics.

For one thing, men, in general, are more averse to seeking professional help for medical or mental problems. And when they do talk to a counselor or doctor, BDP is often misdiagnosed in men.

In fact, the vast majority of men with borderline personality disorder go undiagnosed.

Men are often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed because BPD manifests differently in men than women and is interpreted differently.

It isn’t our fault you have a mental problem. Get professional help.

Fixing the ‘West’ won’t make you happy.

Borderline personality disorder in men is often overlooked and brushed off with a recommendation for an anger management class. Men tend to externalize behaviors like aggression, violent patterns and antisocial traits, including heavier substance use than women.

they’re like the new hippies “it’s the West making me like this, man!”

Then…. move? Forever?

Obvious solution, they never do it. BPDs have abandonment issues. They cannot leave the West because they’d be forced to act alone. They’ll still sit around and complain for years, with total meltdowns and mantrums (like a toddler) because it’s their cry for help, BPD’s way of getting attention. They’ll make up stories of abuse. Nobody has ever suffered in human history like the solid 5 who can’t score a 10 wife, somebody fight this injustice! The Cluster B is an eternal damsel.

You can deal with it, but I won’t. They punish people for trying to help them.

Sometimes these externalized behaviors are misdiagnosed as antisocial personality disorder, anger management problems or something else. Ironically, people with BPD complain of feeling misunderstood and in reality, they are being misunderstood and misdiagnosed.

Maybe the problem really is you, though? Nope, BPD has external locus of control.

Like you’re still responsible for your own choices in life? [they deny this]

If you ask during a tirade on women, they also have more problems with men. The system is against them, all their bosses are Satan, I r so smart fuq IQ tests etc. You cannot help them, they need a shrink. They want you to soothe them but agreeing, saying okay you’re a loser – they’ll try to get revenge on you. Cannot win. I warned you all.

It’s a trap. Engaging with them is a trap.

Familiar?

Here are some ways BPD manifests in men:

  • Sensitive to criticism while responding with aggression
  • Controlling through criticism
  • Holding grudges
  • Fear of rejection played out in jealousy and using sex to alleviate his feelings of rejection
  • Rejecting relationships – when he’s been offended by someone, he hates them; he sees people in good or bad absolutes
  • Jealous or possessive insecurities, but emotionally detached from relationships
  • Using alcohol or drugs to relieve his constant free-floating anxiety

sexual promiscuity too, like the psychopath

I’ll stop quoting there but the rest is good. They never take responsibility for their own actions, beliefs or life either. Classic Cluster B.

Men who are dead inside, incapable of emotional intimacy and empathy. Sure, we need those guys on our side!

Would you want one marrying your sister? Only Q you need ask.

They don’t want a high trust society, they’re still failing in one of the easiest societies in history.

It isn’t our responsibility to fix them.

Generally now.

Why are nasty men more often than not the past-it ones? esp. the never-was-es. Is envy really so spiteful? Just because you’d never have a chance with a woman (entitlement thinking) is no excuse to be verbally abusive, that’ll just put off the women who might’ve been interested? I seldom see women be as ‘spitting-bullets’ as embittered, aged bachelor types. They waste days per year crusading online. Why wouldn’t you be happier, after your decision?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-happy-children-spouse-partner-relationship-unmarried-a8931816.html

The women are? Why wouldn’t bachelors live longer, if it’s so great? Makes no sense.

Boomer bachelors are literally most white suicides right now, they NEVER broach this.

It makes no practical sense so it must be poor emotional control. The one thing an old ugly guy could have on his side is a great personality and they can’t even do THAT right? Why are so many men abject failures on the decency front, must we bring back the military service? Like, what’s missing? The dysfunction would persist even if they lived on an all-male desert island.

We truly bemoan the absence of etiquette.

There seems to be an epidemic of them nagging all and sundry on social media.
You don’t have a time machine to prevent past you from ruining your life and it’s nobody else’s job to ‘fix it’ for you nor soothe you with a long list of ‘demands’ (usually of the Muh Dick variety).
Wastrels always existed historically, you cannot blame Postmodernism for this one.
It seems women are emotionally maturing and just getting on with life faster than men.
You didn’t see staunch Bernie sisters, did you? And now they’re simping for Yang and Biden. They go from one “bro” to another, expecting them to clean up their life’s mess like a Statist Mommy figure. Statist Sugar Babies?
They also seem all too happy to play Judas with no self-awareness while discussing tribal loyalties. Every time someone’s tried to report me for having an Un-PC opinion in public, it was some bitchy little gamma male. They’re huge snitches.

Bring back duelling.

They can larp online as ‘reasonable’ and ‘traditional’ when, if you ask, they engage in all sorts of degeneracy. Various things “don’t count” according to them, like race-cucking porn WMAF. But white women are “their women”. What? They’re amoral, like psychopaths. For thee, but not me. They are the shameless people the Bible warned us about. There’s no Them in there, it’s a bizarre moral hollowness.
I find it ironic they claim to support white people while being more anti-white than the BBC to the literal majority of the white population (women). Like, aren’t the rape gangs enough? At least the media isn’t advocating for your rape as penance for some historical ill.
They still think throwing all white women to the crocodile will appease it, so throw a huge dose of unwise into there too.

Beware, anyone pitying them, that’s the male BPD’s MO.

They’re treating you all like their stand-in girlfriend

They seem to be unable to regulate their own behavior and actions, yet willing to establish limits and boundaries on others.

they complain for attention

They seem to be thrilled by engaging in risky behaviors and often will do so in the presence of others for the sheer joy of creating a shock factor….  The reaction from others makes them feel alive with admiration.

they say anything shocking to get attention

they don’t mean it

Once established in a relationship, a man with BPD will often seek out opportunities to initiate an argument or fight. Often this is in response to their own beliefs that their partner is not interested in them anymore. They have a need to justify their own reaction to these imagined perceptions and initiating arguments becomes the means to an end.

from

16 Signs Of Borderline Personality Disorder in Men

Men with BPD lack emotional intelligence. They are unable to regulate or express their own emotions and can often misread the emotional feel of others.

Men with BPD often are very controlling, having a desire and need to maintain the upper hand in every situation.

Men with BPD can be possessive, taking their partners life into their hands and demanding to make the decisions for any and every possible option they may have. This can include what type of job they may take, the type of clothing they can wear and even the friends they are allowed to have.

cuckoo

better you than me

They can be overly critical of others, using their criticism as a means of control. However, they cannot accept any form of criticism themselves.

They are known for holding grudges and being hostile over minute arguments or disagreements.

I warned ya.

normalising enslaved sows

Using humans as breeding machines is pure evil.

It’s discussed in the comments, not at the top.

https://www.datalounge.com/thread/26360420-at-what-stage-and-level-will-the-gay-babyboom-in-countries-like-the-usa-and-uk-peak-

a main purpose of trafficking is to steal white DNA, mostly skin, but especially lighter eyes and hair

it’s a primary purpose of slavery

Surrogacy is a women’s rights issue, and not a human rights issue for homosexual men. This view removes women from the centre of the debate, reframing male entitlement to women’s reproductive function as a pitiable cause to elicit sympathy from would-be progressives. 

(((male)))

rumour has it cults like the Mormons are deliberately producing children to be trafficked

as young as babies

and then there’s the Cinderella effect with child abuse, the probability of gay parents abusing “their” kids (as stories are coming out of pedo parents) and the misogynistic entitlement as if Darwin didn’t already select you out of the gene pool

r-strategists’ sense of entitlement never ends

so all the tradlarpers saying they’re okay with gays, like it’s harmless, tell us you’re okay with letting them rape your sister (“natural conception”)

go ahead, go full Swede

because that’s on the table now

but cucking to Muslims is wrong, huh?

But, perhaps to obscure this reality, the language of the CPSA went to great lengths to erase biological sex. A significant number of edits were made by Democratic lawmakers wherein “mother” was crossed out and replaced with “gestational carrier,” or “person who gave birth.” Such terminology explicitly mirrors the way conservative anti-choice advocates view women, referring to women as “host bodies,” for example.

those guys aren’t conservatives, they’re Satanists

https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/1%20Peter%203%3A7

Christian men have a duty to protect women from evil men

Similarly, many instances of the term “woman,” “man,” and “paternity” have been removed and replaced:

know the Satanists by their fruit – abuse girls and women, dehumanise both

and this isn’t white men, if you look into it

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7339133/Jeffrey-Epstein-wanted-impregnate-sex-slave-18-raise-child-Ghislaine-Maxwell.html

https://nypost.com/2019/07/31/jeffrey-epstein-wanted-to-turn-new-mexico-ranch-into-a-baby-making-factory/

farming half-white children

that’s their utopia of white genocide

no white men necessary, so death of their line too, indirectly

In this case, “gestational carrier” is used to refer to the woman whose body is being used to gestate a fertilized embryo that does not carry her DNA, though “handmaid” might be a more appropriate term.

human farming, like “surrogacy” farms in India

they want to legally be able to force women to birth children for them, or something something ‘discrimination’

this flies in the face of the Bible prohibition on rape (Death Penalty), respect for women (god’s children) and sexual selection, whereby women keep many of the crazier genes (spiteful mutants) out of the pool with the ‘creeps’ (real reason IVF m-m ‘couples’ cannot find a willing woman)

it’s anti-Christian

it’s a direct attack on the nuclear family

This is especially troubling given that there are no official records kept regarding how many women die in the surrogacy industry. In January, Michelle Reaves died due to complications from a surrogacy birth. Reaves succumbed to a condition known as an amniotic fluid embolism. According to a statement from the Center for Bioethics and Culture (CBC):

(how) are no records kept

((how))

“Recent studies have shown that surrogate pregnancies are different and are high-risk. Studies show that women pregnant with donor eggs (as in gestational surrogacy) have a more than three-fold risk of developing pregnancy induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia.”

except white women are human (obviously), the future of the extreme global minority race and already huge victims of trafficking for that breeding sow purpose (usually by Arabs), have been for centuries
giving birth kills women every year, it’s on par with major surgery and the bodily changes/birth can be traumatic

this is like sexual pressganging with a side of rape

even egg donation confers risks of developing endometriosis, infertility, or the fatal condition of OHSS.

irony

but women are not fish, you can’t steal our eggs and expect us to be fine

forcing anyone to carry alone would be traumatising, I don’t see men queuing up to get a womb transplanted because it messes with your head, women hate being pregnant and that’s when it’s their husbands’!

the concept of being entitled to reproduce is exclusively heterosexual in the exclusive mutual agreement of a marriage

the document you’re looking for is a marriage certificate, nothing less gives you reproduction rights over another human. Nobody is entitled to have children and the people who disagree are narcissists, who should be legally banned.

I wonder if they’re trying to normalise this human rights abuse before the pedo stuff comes out

I think we’re starting to see why patriarchy both protects its daughters and hates homosexual men.

It’s still little known that most rapists are practically bisexual (“pan” if you believe in that). They tend to go after women because of the physical weakness of women, not a preference. Look at places like Afghanistan where they overpower little boys and goats.

https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/7-4.htm

A wife does not have the right over her own body, but her husband does. In the same way, a husband does not have the right over his own body, but his wife does.

And a man’s reproduction choices are the jurisdiction of his wife, not him. It isn’t one way, it’s equal yoking.

r-types never stop sinking to new lows, including the tranny parent pushers

they believe they own their children and ruthlessly control their life, even going so far as to buy them by force (madwomen like Jolie do this too, it would be false to assume her adoptions were all legal)

Girlhood, Interrupted: Angelina Jolie Forcing Shiloh Into Tomboyhood, Overall Deviance

there was another CDAN blind about Jolie forcing her kids to write sexual fantasies in a journal and give it back to her everyday

these people are insane

insanity looks fine until you talk to it

like the guy who says he’s proud to be gay but feels entitled to rape your niece’s teen womb

rapists are evolutionally after reproduction so it’s rape in multiple senses of the word

A few years ago there were a couple separate cases of couples, one gay and one hetero suing ivf clinics because the kids came out a different race and so was obviously not related to them. I’ve often wondered how common these mix ups are. I bet a lot of times they remain undiscovered because the kid has the same ethnicity as the bio parent so no one guesses.

no that’s deliberate

genocide, only white couples get “mixed up”

who owns the IVF companies (Israel)

Sexual coercion still illegal

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/471582-jessica-yaniv-transgender-wax-balls/

If a woman doesn’t wanna touch your balls, no still means no.

They’re so clearly just sex predators waiting for plausible deniability.

Why not get a man to wax you? So entitled.

Due to inexperience or religion, the women denied her requests, to which she declared it was discrimination on the basis of gender identity.

Yeah, it’s also about religion.

it is not a violation for a service provider to not wax a type of genitals they are not trained for, or haven’t consented to wax; a pleasant turn of events for vulnerable women who should never be forced to touch male genitalia. 

Consider that as precedent, if the creep got his way.

Jonathan (his real name), is a con artist who is using gender identity to engage in perverted fantasies.

um, as opposed to?

it’s autogynephilia

and there are psychopathic rapists who just want access to women, like the prison guy

two places women undress – gym and bathroom plus the place they sleep – shelters/prison

More so as men are now using transgenderism as an excuse to invade women’s private spaces.

Men who feel sexually entitled also extend that to other human beings? Huh.

Last year, nine homeless women kicked off a lawsuit against a women’s shelter after they were FORCED to shower with a trans-woman. The shelter requires everyone to shower in groups,

affront to human dignity, this isn’t Nazi Germany

legal right to religious modesty

r-types are funny about open changing rooms and showers, they hate cubicles because they are predatory and like to revoke the right to privacy including the natural modesty of Ks

and the person who self-identified as trans began making sexual remarks and even stared at the others as they bathed. 

Creep is creepy, no shit.

This is why we had asylums.

A lot of rapists used to go to asylums and it was noted they enjoyed dressing up as women.

Even those locked behind bars are not safe, as a trans inmate was given a life sentence after sexually assaulting women in prison. That this man was even in a women’s prison is a horrid oversight by those in charge, as he had previous convictions related to sex crime.

Oversight?

The rich want tax cattle and your children raped*, oppose this bullshit.

*(If your kids have trauma, theirs have a competitive edge in the world. AKA The Left’s MO)

I do not know what the solution is, more so as I myself am trans.

aaaaaah

that explains the “don’t panic” tone of “not all” despite prison studies saying ‘basically characteristic’

But something does need to change. Because today it may be “wax my balls,” but tomorrow it could be a parent-free topless pool party for kids.

Oh wait, Yaniv already tried that too.

Let women carry pepper spray and knives FFS.

comment

He doesnt want surgery. he wants to get at little girls.

comment about the DARVO typical of sexual psychopaths

She calls “himself” a protected group, but ignores the fact that religious liberties are themselves protected. Human garbage. Outright liar, then proceeds to try to not only force other people to lie along with you, but grab your private parts while they do it. That is the epitome of abuse, “he” and others like “him” should be arrested for sexual assault!

It’s the control. Foot in the door with “let me wear a dress” then “let me use the toilet” then “let me near your kids and you’d better call me Ma’am”. The threats come in with psychopaths, mask slip upon showing boundaries and saying NO. Read Hare’s work.

The sexual entitlement of the sadist knows no bounds. They enjoy the FORCING, that’s why finding someone into it never seems possible. They enjoy the humiliation aspect.

Previously it was just tricking people.

comments, refreshingly uncensored

What a thoroughly revolting specimen of a human being this person is.

I always knew guillotines would be back in fashion.

Could solve that problem with a “cigar cutter” (and cheaper)

Is Yaniv a )ew? The root of all evil…

Amazing. Yaniv is a Jewish name. Every. Single. Time.

What people really think of them.

The question is: what is wrong with men?

There’s a ton of ((((pornographic))) brainwashing, that’s for sure. All this entitlement is weird and dehumanising. Even male friends are now believing harassment stories because gay guys are openly doing the same to them (since you can’t arrest them).

Any time a genetic male feels like a woman has to see his junk, touch his junk or be naked in the same vacinity as him i.e changing room , bathrooms ..its sexual harassment . Also, bathrooms have always been a woman safe space as well as changing rooms. The place she goes to when she is being followed by a creeper, or has been assaulted , or is getting harassed. We open that up to the opposite sex…where do women go to feels safe in public places?

True. They’re a safe harbour.

Well safe spaces do exist the Left just co-opted the term to endanger women.

Schools are safe spaces for kids, obviously. Mixed sex schools should be banned for that reason alone. The left was eager to make more of them in the 60-70s pedo era to reduce the safety of that space. The conservatives don’t care.

Mixed schools also have worse grades, so an automatic advantage to those spared.

Normalising paraphilias typical of predators as ‘fun kink’ is really SJW victim blaming. If it’s fun for one party and degrading to the other, it’s a human rights crime.

Call the freaks what they are. Manginas.

Define “normal”

it’s interesting people are siding with Joker in a clown world of the current year.

Called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/10/why-mockery/

And this stance by Sargon is, therefore, blatantly wrong. People with a conscience are not mentally unhinged for wanting good and justice to prevail, stop accepting their rhetorical subtext. They are locked in here with YOU, we outnumber THEM, we out-skill THEM, you can have FUN with them. YOU have that choice, they can only react.

“For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief.” Ecclesiastes 1:18

Initially, yes. Once it’s absorbed, you can be a whiny broflake like Sargon (somehow ‘surprised’ the people who say they hate white people, actually hate white people!) or be an adult and think “huh, useful”. ADAPT or DIE. I am literally years ahead on this curve.

Soft-pawed little liberals reee.

wah wah poor handsome white man with talent

hahaha no.gif

really?

cursed with awesome?

would you rather be an SJW, Sargon?

quit hiding your power level FFS, at least to yourself

little triggers the SJW hive like agreeing with them

capitalise on the stupidity of PC culture (as he does.… his livelihood relies on strong SJW culture, just sayin’)

you have the advantage, the red pill is actually very financially valuable

THINK

science drink

What would the (Jewish) Jesus do?

A – nothing (Churchian logic) because meek = weak in character now.

B – Jew everyone (atheistkult logic), the guy who rejected Satan’s materialism

C – Jew everyone so hard and in such a way that nobody could Jew anyone ever again…. it would be infamous Jewing. This is the Domino Approach. The pattern is the choice. Punish virtue (them) or punish vice (Christians*, allowing them to heap responsibilities on themselves, waiting for the dam to break).

You can steal tactics and use them better with your legitimately superior IQ is all I’m sayin’.

*”Be wise as serpents” – literally Jesus

dealwithit jesus

You don’t have to help everyone, did he help the moneylenders? Drop the school conditioning. You don’t have to save anyone (cuckservative logic, and you’re not Jesus), they are not being irrational, they actually mean what they say, they are not children.  They are not pure, innocent, gullible or just misunderstanding after years of conversation. Are they good or evil? Do they promote good or evil? You just don’t like the idea of the traitor but hey, Judas.

You fret like menopausal women about the End Times or the SJWs ‘winning’.

Winning what, exactly?

I would dearly like a serious answer on a postcard to that question.

I’m sick of broflakes using it for clickbait. Stop being so hysterically reactive to everything the Left does and man up. Let Gollum** die with the ring, we don’t give a fuck?

**Jewish myth.

It’s almost like these guys tacitly support the evil thing that makes them money. God forbid you might have to get a real job down a coalmine like we know every masculinity blogger secretly claims to want…

What if the SJWs ‘won’ everything, then?

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

We know they cannot maintain First World living, they also are ignorant as to the value of Western Civ. Developing yourself will spite the Marxist, they cannot transfer the skills out of your brain.

“the prince of this world is judged” John 16:11

Stop acting like Atlas trying to play God, when you can’t even graduate to full-time adult. It’s Satanic to be such a control freak you genuinely think you speak for all men, all women or all right-wingers. Focus on your purpose instead.

Like logically, if women are property, you can’t be a deadbeat, you’d be lynched. Patriarchy holds men and spoiled sons fully accountable for abandonment, viscerally. There are many things you wimps feel entitled to, thanks to SJW Sexual Revolution BS, that are outright evil e.g. if you ‘get’ a woman pregnant, you feel entitled to demand an abortion. Or they’d charge the father for the starvation of their children, because provider gender role is male. MRAs doublespeak accept and reject this. It isn’t the mother’s responsibility to feed it, they had a duty to stick around. These guys want to be a whore like Hilton with no consequences, but reality burdens other people that way.

Who wants to pay for trash? To take their place in financial ruin?

You only have any rights over a child if you married their mother.

Get out of here with your ghetto logic to the contrary.

That’s what marriage is, you bloody retards. How are you adults who don’t get this?

The MRAs are angry they don’t immediately own another human being, as if that ever happened. Marriage gives you paternal rights, nothing less, and with it, responsibility! You were never yoked, you get NOTHING. You didn’t want her as your wife or she didn’t want you as her husband, you ‘deserve’ NOTHING. You are entitled to NOTHING. You have NO rights over the woman (who belongs to her family) because you stuck your dick in her one time, consensual or not. There is no Biblical basis for that, never has been but there is from killing attempted rapists….?

A spent seed is worthless, a fertile field is valuable. For people who mock SJW’s ignorance of biological difference, sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive? Nine months of extreme endurance on the body is very expensive. Have you looked up how medically damaging pregnancy is? Why aren’t single mothers suing for medical bills?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/9288375/pregnant-women-limit-human-endurance/

And no appreciation? No wonder they’re angry.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10033108/mind-blowing-photo-womans-bones-moving-during-labour/

Don’t blame the sluts for what the deadbeats did. Would they need a ‘stepdad’?

The modern mangina tries to draw from the rights of the husband (patriarch) when he never stepped up to that plate. Can I draw a veteran’s pension, by that logic? Fake patriarchs are just sexually active Peter Pans.

The broflake types are acting in bad faith, literally. Plus the fallacy. They’re acting like they matter, like their opinion is real, like their feels are important and all the hysteria and chicken little is really pissing me off. I was here first. I never fell for the e-celeb cancer. It’s bad optics and drains attention from worthy ends. So what if the “economy” stock market collapses? I don’t live in Asia like a treasonous POS, I don’t give a shit.

Gary Oldman speaks to me on a spiritual level

Actually, I look forward to it. Lie down with dogs, get fleas.

You, God, are my God,
earnestly I seek you;
I thirst for you,
my whole being longs for you,
in a dry and parched land
where there is no water.

Drinking the tears of the anti-white/weeb menace is justice. They jumped ship – onto the Titanic.

lolmaletears

You can’t pretend to care about Muh West while living East, Judas.

Do not listen to trolls, scoffing at muh evil white mother figures.

“Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.” Prov 22:10

In trivial but hilarious news, only recently have people finally stopped telling me to move to China. See why it’s cheap now?

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

Where is this emboldened reaction from the people so desperate to be seen as right-wing?

https://biblereasons.com/fake-christians/

If you die because you followed some bravado blogger’s advice, that’s just natural selection ma fren.

yay happy

Their weak, lily-livered reaction from behind the safety of air con and a Macbook is the sign of our degeneracy. And they actually think they’re icons? They’re philosophers?*** They’re men of the people? People look up to their whining? People respect them? They admire their screeching?

Imagine what your Victorian grandpa would say.

“We need a good war”, I love that speech.

***I am clearly joking. It’s on the about page for God’s sake.

People these days don’t know their arse from their elbow, they dunno they’re born alright.

What is the Real Meaning of the Verse, “Wise as a Serpent and Harmless as a Dove?”

Do-gooders with pathological altruism are doing evil.

I the LORD search the heart and test the mind,
to give every man according to his ways,
according to the fruit of his deeds.

They are judged by their results.

Why worry about them? Are they your child?

oh come on my god why NO kill me now

Stop.

Stop the cucking already.

matrix system

We infantilise our “fellow whites” when freedom means you can choose to be dumb, you have agency to be evil – you cannot choose to force people to help you or believe you were innocent of knowing the fruit of your deeds would occur or bail you/others out of your own reaping when you were gloating about the sowing. Beware of non sequiturs.

It’s sad but some people have wasted lives. Some Marxists today would’ve been the past century’s sacrificial war heroes.

One month of reasonably, calmly mocking the wolves in sheep’s clothing (see recent islam meme for a start) would be glorious. Nobody wants to do it. Get one Owen Jones and his MO is kaput. No such person playing anti-white messiah could attempt his career path in future. You kill the hydra, not one head.

This is not only sanctioned but ordered. It isn’t my success, it’s all God.

Serve Him or Satan, easy choice.
I don’t want idolatry, I don’t want fame, I want good to win. That’s faith.

That’s why people connect to the new Joker too. It’s spiritual.

He’s a broken spirit.

John 17:15:

“I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil”.

are you not entertained

Do you know how easy it is to destroy these people with simple Bible quotes?

Nothing beats it as rhetoric or dialectic.

Ancient wisdom – appeal to authority and tradition. If they argue back, they validate. Critical theory requires they validate with argumentation.

would you rather be big fish in little pond or little fish in big pond?

Joker hits on Ecc 4:14 The youth may have come from prison to the kingship, or he may have been born in poverty within his kingdom.

stoicism isn’t nihilism, satanism, hedonism, apathy, despair

it’s remembering you can treat emotions as reasons without letting them rule you

the SJW is our chew toy and I wouldn’t have it any other way

computer.gif

they wanted this reality, they wanted to play This Game, the kid gloves are off, be careful what you wish for, these people are essentially self-destructive but how this happens can serve our thede interests long-term and culturally for better or for worse

1 cor 3:17 If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person; for God’s temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.

they wanted to play replace me! complete with bloody signposts.. so we do

refugeesracism

what kind of meritocracy honouring birth rights do we replace them with?

that is the only question that matters

The Great Replacement will happen whether you like it or not.

they killed internet bloodsports for beginning to discuss that pro-socially, logically and calmly!

 

I’d mention white slaves, including little girls across England…. but okay.

genocide

Social Services are actually paid to steal children here, per child. I believe Blair brought it in. That’s how it happens that trafficking for rape is written up as ‘gangs’ instead of white slavery, and active ongoing genocide by all markers especially point e.

Paying for children is slavery but everyone’s too scared to meme it. It puts off women from having kids…

paying per child = slave trade, right now, taxpayer-sponsored

That’s something to really shriek about.

the SJW is most scared of white people when they’re laughing at the anti-white plans

sarcy clapping

think about it

because they have a better one

Fake Christians are weak

https://pjmedia.com/faith/josh-harris-kisses-christianity-goodbye/

Slut abandons faith, shocker.

Born-agains are liars.

Trust no slut.

Jeremiah 13:23

But there is little hope for you ever doing good, you who are so accustomed to doing evil. Can an Ethiopian change the color of his skin? Can a leopard remove its spots?
Can a fake K-type un-atrophy his amygdala and un-STD his peen?

We don’t kill apostates but isolation and mockery is worse for a narcissist.

They ruin any marriage they’re in, even with a Saint they’d be trying to change them (usually sexually).

It’s like these low IQ manwhores are applying magic dirt to morality and the fruits of a holy life.

Standing in a stable don’t make you a horse.

Standing in a Church won’t give you the good life, you cannot have it all.

Wolf in sheep’s clothing, if you’re there for selfish reasons, God sees your heart and you shall FAIL.

Knowing the irony of these things, probably via the divorce you avoided marrying a fellow slut for. Pretty sure divorce risk goes up higher with more divorced sexual attitudes (sodomy etc) than it would go down for marrying a Christian like they’re your cuckoo egg cover. Marrying one doesn’t expunge your own sins. Why do Americans engage in these non sequiturs? If you wrong a Christian spouse (say by coercing them into sodomy, opposing their very existence and oppressing the reason you married them for), they’ll be more likely to divorce you, if anything. I’m sure sexual depravity is a major reason Christian women divorce. If a husband doesn’t serve God, he serves Satan. It becomes imperative to divorce such a monster.

There is no debt forgiveness for the wages of sin.

I want a divorce rate study on male and female Born-Again CHINOs.

We already know most divorces are from re-marriages.

And cuck Christians won’t attract any woman worth her salt.

Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

There’s no such thing as a tease

It’s a porn lie. They’re selling you the idea of sexually forward women.

Or Hollywood Lolita pedo bullshit.

A ‘tease’ is what creeps say to attractive women who existed in their vicinity.

You are not entitled to sex. There’s no coy, they’re just not interested. In studies, these types of men have been proven to assume sexual interest from women where there was none, deluding themselves. Nobody is leading them on, but you have to humour the crazy to get away. Picture it like a hoodie approaching you asking for something. Be nice and get away.
They are being civilized, women are conditioned to smile, it’s polite.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/az1w3j/do_you_hate_it_when_women_on_the_streets_smile_at/

They’re such cowards they’ll literally body slam a woman, the weaker sex.
Literal assault.
You’re angry with men? Pick on your own sex.
But if they continue to physically assault women walking in public, they’ll get plenty of ‘sex’ in prison.

Things that make women evil, according to incels:

being female
(being male, too)
being male and looking female
being ambiguously male or female
looking at them
not looking at them
smiling at them
not smiling at them
being fat
being thin
being tall
being short
being smart
being dumb
being scientific
not being scientific
being soldiers
not being soldiers
being mothers
not being mothers
being wives
being single
being Christian
being atheist
having sex
not having sex
make-up
no make-up
fake nails
natural nails
expensive hairdo
crap hairdo
dressing feminine
not dressing feminine
curves
no curves
caring what men think
not caring what men think
having opinions
not having opinions
working hard
being lazy
voting
not voting
paying taxes
not paying taxes
having a job
being on welfare
being a boss
being married to a boss
paying for their own meal
not paying for their own meal
attention-whoring
avoiding them
oppressing them with relationships
not oppressing them with relationships
having kids, with anyone
having no kids, with anyone
race-mixing
not race-mixing
showing skin
wearing long skirts
posting bikini shots
not posting bikini shots
flirting randomly
not flirting
being clingy
being a cold-hearted bitch
getting emotional
having none of the feels

Need I go on? Clearly, women are not the problem.

Near the end of that long, long list:

killing your kids
making them pay child support
reporting rape
not reporting rape
being murdered
being alive

Maybe they just have anger issues? They are the most triggered people ALIVE.
Offended by literally anything.

But it isn’t misogyny!

They don’t HATE women, they just want single wives who are whorish virgins with all and no sexual XP, fertile but not too much, exactly the religious they are, a domestic slave that doesn’t need to be paid or sleep or work or clean or tend to babies while homesteading and living in the city because of the bars, with magical gravity defying tiddies despite breastfeeding at least 12 babies, all vaginal deliveries with no complications, tearing or stretch marks.

See? Totally reasonable.

She also never has periods (but fertile) and manages to keep a perfect figure, even throughout pregnancy and lactation.

It isn’t women they hate, just women who don’t live up to their standard, which totally existed in the ambiguous Past in the vague Culture they keep talking about [citation needed].

Because beggars can indeed be choosers and they choose the best.

Women are obviously entitled snowflakes who project because men are flawless and never wrong, that’s why their death rate is high, drug abuse is high, crime is high, mental problems are high and IQs are globally tanked.

The politics of all these wonderful male politicians has given us such a peaceful, logical society.

Women: exist
Incels: …bitch

Women are so IRRATIONAL, AREN’T THEY?

Yet another exciting round of ‘why everything is women’s fault even though men are statistically in charge’.

It’s like atheists with Christians but sex-specific, which isn’t even a choice.

What kind of Satanism is this? They must be operating from a spiritual void, but which one?

Don’t tread on me means don’t tell me to fucking smile, it’s weird. Nobody finds a man that insecure about a stranger’s facial expression charming.

Women are striking, you just don’t see it.

No future? Fine, no bother.

If men don’t wanna get married, the motivation for women giving a single shit what they “think” flutters out the window, drops and dies on the pavement.

If that were true, women would be having less sex than older generations at the same age. Check.

Women would be less likely to report as feminists? Check.

Women would be voting Brexit and Trump. Check.

Women would be focusing on career since men won’t be the provider? Check.

Women would be insulting men who refuse their gender role. Check.

Women wouldn’t sleep around because there’s nothing in it. Check.

All the damn checks. And you know the worst part?