Sexual coercion still illegal

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/471582-jessica-yaniv-transgender-wax-balls/

If a woman doesn’t wanna touch your balls, no still means no.

They’re so clearly just sex predators waiting for plausible deniability.

Why not get a man to wax you? So entitled.

Due to inexperience or religion, the women denied her requests, to which she declared it was discrimination on the basis of gender identity.

Yeah, it’s also about religion.

it is not a violation for a service provider to not wax a type of genitals they are not trained for, or haven’t consented to wax; a pleasant turn of events for vulnerable women who should never be forced to touch male genitalia. 

Consider that as precedent, if the creep got his way.

Jonathan (his real name), is a con artist who is using gender identity to engage in perverted fantasies.

um, as opposed to?

it’s autogynephilia

and there are psychopathic rapists who just want access to women, like the prison guy

two places women undress – gym and bathroom plus the place they sleep – shelters/prison

More so as men are now using transgenderism as an excuse to invade women’s private spaces.

Men who feel sexually entitled also extend that to other human beings? Huh.

Last year, nine homeless women kicked off a lawsuit against a women’s shelter after they were FORCED to shower with a trans-woman. The shelter requires everyone to shower in groups,

affront to human dignity, this isn’t Nazi Germany

legal right to religious modesty

r-types are funny about open changing rooms and showers, they hate cubicles because they are predatory and like to revoke the right to privacy including the natural modesty of Ks

and the person who self-identified as trans began making sexual remarks and even stared at the others as they bathed. 

Creep is creepy, no shit.

This is why we had asylums.

A lot of rapists used to go to asylums and it was noted they enjoyed dressing up as women.

Even those locked behind bars are not safe, as a trans inmate was given a life sentence after sexually assaulting women in prison. That this man was even in a women’s prison is a horrid oversight by those in charge, as he had previous convictions related to sex crime.

Oversight?

The rich want tax cattle and your children raped*, oppose this bullshit.

*(If your kids have trauma, theirs have a competitive edge in the world. AKA The Left’s MO)

I do not know what the solution is, more so as I myself am trans.

aaaaaah

that explains the “don’t panic” tone of “not all” despite prison studies saying ‘basically characteristic’

But something does need to change. Because today it may be “wax my balls,” but tomorrow it could be a parent-free topless pool party for kids.

Oh wait, Yaniv already tried that too.

Let women carry pepper spray and knives FFS.

comment

He doesnt want surgery. he wants to get at little girls.

comment about the DARVO typical of sexual psychopaths

She calls “himself” a protected group, but ignores the fact that religious liberties are themselves protected. Human garbage. Outright liar, then proceeds to try to not only force other people to lie along with you, but grab your private parts while they do it. That is the epitome of abuse, “he” and others like “him” should be arrested for sexual assault!

It’s the control. Foot in the door with “let me wear a dress” then “let me use the toilet” then “let me near your kids and you’d better call me Ma’am”. The threats come in with psychopaths, mask slip upon showing boundaries and saying NO. Read Hare’s work.

The sexual entitlement of the sadist knows no bounds. They enjoy the FORCING, that’s why finding someone into it never seems possible. They enjoy the humiliation aspect.

Previously it was just tricking people.

comments, refreshingly uncensored

What a thoroughly revolting specimen of a human being this person is.

I always knew guillotines would be back in fashion.

Could solve that problem with a “cigar cutter” (and cheaper)

Is Yaniv a )ew? The root of all evil…

Amazing. Yaniv is a Jewish name. Every. Single. Time.

What people really think of them.

The question is: what is wrong with men?

There’s a ton of ((((pornographic))) brainwashing, that’s for sure. All this entitlement is weird and dehumanising. Even male friends are now believing harassment stories because gay guys are openly doing the same to them (since you can’t arrest them).

Any time a genetic male feels like a woman has to see his junk, touch his junk or be naked in the same vacinity as him i.e changing room , bathrooms ..its sexual harassment . Also, bathrooms have always been a woman safe space as well as changing rooms. The place she goes to when she is being followed by a creeper, or has been assaulted , or is getting harassed. We open that up to the opposite sex…where do women go to feels safe in public places?

True. They’re a safe harbour.

Well safe spaces do exist the Left just co-opted the term to endanger women.

Schools are safe spaces for kids, obviously. Mixed sex schools should be banned for that reason alone. The left was eager to make more of them in the 60-70s pedo era to reduce the safety of that space. The conservatives don’t care.

Mixed schools also have worse grades, so an automatic advantage to those spared.

Normalising paraphilias typical of predators as ‘fun kink’ is really SJW victim blaming. If it’s fun for one party and degrading to the other, it’s a human rights crime.

Call the freaks what they are. Manginas.

Define “normal”

it’s interesting people are siding with Joker in a clown world of the current year.

Called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/10/why-mockery/

And this stance by Sargon is, therefore, blatantly wrong. People with a conscience are not mentally unhinged for wanting good and justice to prevail, stop accepting their rhetorical subtext. They are locked in here with YOU, we outnumber THEM, we out-skill THEM, you can have FUN with them. YOU have that choice, they can only react.

“For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief.” Ecclesiastes 1:18

Initially, yes. Once it’s absorbed, you can be a whiny broflake like Sargon (somehow ‘surprised’ the people who say they hate white people, actually hate white people!) or be an adult and think “huh, useful”. ADAPT or DIE. I am literally years ahead on this curve.

Soft-pawed little liberals reee.

wah wah poor handsome white man with talent

hahaha no.gif

really?

cursed with awesome?

would you rather be an SJW, Sargon?

quit hiding your power level FFS, at least to yourself

little triggers the SJW hive like agreeing with them

capitalise on the stupidity of PC culture (as he does.… his livelihood relies on strong SJW culture, just sayin’)

you have the advantage, the red pill is actually very financially valuable

THINK

science drink

What would the (Jewish) Jesus do?

A – nothing (Churchian logic) because meek = weak in character now.

B – Jew everyone (atheistkult logic), the guy who rejected Satan’s materialism

C – Jew everyone so hard and in such a way that nobody could Jew anyone ever again…. it would be infamous Jewing. This is the Domino Approach. The pattern is the choice. Punish virtue (them) or punish vice (Christians*, allowing them to heap responsibilities on themselves, waiting for the dam to break).

You can steal tactics and use them better with your legitimately superior IQ is all I’m sayin’.

*”Be wise as serpents” – literally Jesus

dealwithit jesus

You don’t have to help everyone, did he help the moneylenders? Drop the school conditioning. You don’t have to save anyone (cuckservative logic, and you’re not Jesus), they are not being irrational, they actually mean what they say, they are not children.  They are not pure, innocent, gullible or just misunderstanding after years of conversation. Are they good or evil? Do they promote good or evil? You just don’t like the idea of the traitor but hey, Judas.

You fret like menopausal women about the End Times or the SJWs ‘winning’.

Winning what, exactly?

I would dearly like a serious answer on a postcard to that question.

I’m sick of broflakes using it for clickbait. Stop being so hysterically reactive to everything the Left does and man up. Let Gollum** die with the ring, we don’t give a fuck?

**Jewish myth.

It’s almost like these guys tacitly support the evil thing that makes them money. God forbid you might have to get a real job down a coalmine like we know every masculinity blogger secretly claims to want…

What if the SJWs ‘won’ everything, then?

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

We know they cannot maintain First World living, they also are ignorant as to the value of Western Civ. Developing yourself will spite the Marxist, they cannot transfer the skills out of your brain.

“the prince of this world is judged” John 16:11

Stop acting like Atlas trying to play God, when you can’t even graduate to full-time adult. It’s Satanic to be such a control freak you genuinely think you speak for all men, all women or all right-wingers. Focus on your purpose instead.

Like logically, if women are property, you can’t be a deadbeat, you’d be lynched. Patriarchy holds men and spoiled sons fully accountable for abandonment, viscerally. There are many things you wimps feel entitled to, thanks to SJW Sexual Revolution BS, that are outright evil e.g. if you ‘get’ a woman pregnant, you feel entitled to demand an abortion. Or they’d charge the father for the starvation of their children, because provider gender role is male. MRAs doublespeak accept and reject this. It isn’t the mother’s responsibility to feed it, they had a duty to stick around. These guys want to be a whore like Hilton with no consequences, but reality burdens other people that way.

Who wants to pay for trash? To take their place in financial ruin?

You only have any rights over a child if you married their mother.

Get out of here with your ghetto logic to the contrary.

That’s what marriage is, you bloody retards. How are you adults who don’t get this?

The MRAs are angry they don’t immediately own another human being, as if that ever happened. Marriage gives you paternal rights, nothing less, and with it, responsibility! You were never yoked, you get NOTHING. You didn’t want her as your wife or she didn’t want you as her husband, you ‘deserve’ NOTHING. You are entitled to NOTHING. You have NO rights over the woman (who belongs to her family) because you stuck your dick in her one time, consensual or not. There is no Biblical basis for that, never has been but there is from killing attempted rapists….?

A spent seed is worthless, a fertile field is valuable. For people who mock SJW’s ignorance of biological difference, sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive? Nine months of extreme endurance on the body is very expensive. Have you looked up how medically damaging pregnancy is? Why aren’t single mothers suing for medical bills?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/9288375/pregnant-women-limit-human-endurance/

And no appreciation? No wonder they’re angry.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10033108/mind-blowing-photo-womans-bones-moving-during-labour/

Don’t blame the sluts for what the deadbeats did. Would they need a ‘stepdad’?

The modern mangina tries to draw from the rights of the husband (patriarch) when he never stepped up to that plate. Can I draw a veteran’s pension, by that logic? Fake patriarchs are just sexually active Peter Pans.

The broflake types are acting in bad faith, literally. Plus the fallacy. They’re acting like they matter, like their opinion is real, like their feels are important and all the hysteria and chicken little is really pissing me off. I was here first. I never fell for the e-celeb cancer. It’s bad optics and drains attention from worthy ends. So what if the “economy” stock market collapses? I don’t live in Asia like a treasonous POS, I don’t give a shit.

Gary Oldman speaks to me on a spiritual level

Actually, I look forward to it. Lie down with dogs, get fleas.

You, God, are my God,
earnestly I seek you;
I thirst for you,
my whole being longs for you,
in a dry and parched land
where there is no water.

Drinking the tears of the anti-white/weeb menace is justice. They jumped ship – onto the Titanic.

lolmaletears

You can’t pretend to care about Muh West while living East, Judas.

Do not listen to trolls, scoffing at muh evil white mother figures.

“Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.” Prov 22:10

In trivial but hilarious news, only recently have people finally stopped telling me to move to China. See why it’s cheap now?

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

Where is this emboldened reaction from the people so desperate to be seen as right-wing?

https://biblereasons.com/fake-christians/

If you die because you followed some bravado blogger’s advice, that’s just natural selection ma fren.

yay happy

Their weak, lily-livered reaction from behind the safety of air con and a Macbook is the sign of our degeneracy. And they actually think they’re icons? They’re philosophers?*** They’re men of the people? People look up to their whining? People respect them? They admire their screeching?

Imagine what your Victorian grandpa would say.

“We need a good war”, I love that speech.

***I am clearly joking. It’s on the about page for God’s sake.

People these days don’t know their arse from their elbow, they dunno they’re born alright.

What is the Real Meaning of the Verse, “Wise as a Serpent and Harmless as a Dove?”

Do-gooders with pathological altruism are doing evil.

I the LORD search the heart and test the mind,
to give every man according to his ways,
according to the fruit of his deeds.

They are judged by their results.

Why worry about them? Are they your child?

oh come on my god why NO kill me now

Stop.

Stop the cucking already.

matrix system

We infantilise our “fellow whites” when freedom means you can choose to be dumb, you have agency to be evil – you cannot choose to force people to help you or believe you were innocent of knowing the fruit of your deeds would occur or bail you/others out of your own reaping when you were gloating about the sowing. Beware of non sequiturs.

It’s sad but some people have wasted lives. Some Marxists today would’ve been the past century’s sacrificial war heroes.

One month of reasonably, calmly mocking the wolves in sheep’s clothing (see recent islam meme for a start) would be glorious. Nobody wants to do it. Get one Owen Jones and his MO is kaput. No such person playing anti-white messiah could attempt his career path in future. You kill the hydra, not one head.

This is not only sanctioned but ordered. It isn’t my success, it’s all God.

Serve Him or Satan, easy choice.
I don’t want idolatry, I don’t want fame, I want good to win. That’s faith.

That’s why people connect to the new Joker too. It’s spiritual.

He’s a broken spirit.

John 17:15:

“I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil”.

are you not entertained

Do you know how easy it is to destroy these people with simple Bible quotes?

Nothing beats it as rhetoric or dialectic.

Ancient wisdom – appeal to authority and tradition. If they argue back, they validate. Critical theory requires they validate with argumentation.

would you rather be big fish in little pond or little fish in big pond?

Joker hits on Ecc 4:14 The youth may have come from prison to the kingship, or he may have been born in poverty within his kingdom.

stoicism isn’t nihilism, satanism, hedonism, apathy, despair

it’s remembering you can treat emotions as reasons without letting them rule you

the SJW is our chew toy and I wouldn’t have it any other way

computer.gif

they wanted this reality, they wanted to play This Game, the kid gloves are off, be careful what you wish for, these people are essentially self-destructive but how this happens can serve our thede interests long-term and culturally for better or for worse

1 cor 3:17 If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person; for God’s temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.

they wanted to play replace me! complete with bloody signposts.. so we do

refugeesracism

what kind of meritocracy honouring birth rights do we replace them with?

that is the only question that matters

The Great Replacement will happen whether you like it or not.

they killed internet bloodsports for beginning to discuss that pro-socially, logically and calmly!

 

I’d mention white slaves, including little girls across England…. but okay.

genocide

Social Services are actually paid to steal children here, per child. I believe Blair brought it in. That’s how it happens that trafficking for rape is written up as ‘gangs’ instead of white slavery, and active ongoing genocide by all markers especially point e.

Paying for children is slavery but everyone’s too scared to meme it. It puts off women from having kids…

paying per child = slave trade, right now, taxpayer-sponsored

That’s something to really shriek about.

the SJW is most scared of white people when they’re laughing at the anti-white plans

sarcy clapping

think about it

because they have a better one

Fake Christians are weak

https://pjmedia.com/faith/josh-harris-kisses-christianity-goodbye/

Slut abandons faith, shocker.

Born-agains are liars.

Trust no slut.

Jeremiah 13:23

But there is little hope for you ever doing good, you who are so accustomed to doing evil. Can an Ethiopian change the color of his skin? Can a leopard remove its spots?
Can a fake K-type un-atrophy his amygdala and un-STD his peen?

We don’t kill apostates but isolation and mockery is worse for a narcissist.

They ruin any marriage they’re in, even with a Saint they’d be trying to change them (usually sexually).

It’s like these low IQ manwhores are applying magic dirt to morality and the fruits of a holy life.

Standing in a stable don’t make you a horse.

Standing in a Church won’t give you the good life, you cannot have it all.

Wolf in sheep’s clothing, if you’re there for selfish reasons, God sees your heart and you shall FAIL.

Knowing the irony of these things, probably via the divorce you avoided marrying a fellow slut for. Pretty sure divorce risk goes up higher with more divorced sexual attitudes (sodomy etc) than it would go down for marrying a Christian like they’re your cuckoo egg cover. Marrying one doesn’t expunge your own sins. Why do Americans engage in these non sequiturs? If you wrong a Christian spouse (say by coercing them into sodomy, opposing their very existence and oppressing the reason you married them for), they’ll be more likely to divorce you, if anything. I’m sure sexual depravity is a major reason Christian women divorce. If a husband doesn’t serve God, he serves Satan. It becomes imperative to divorce such a monster.

There is no debt forgiveness for the wages of sin.

I want a divorce rate study on male and female Born-Again CHINOs.

We already know most divorces are from re-marriages.

And cuck Christians won’t attract any woman worth her salt.

Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

There’s no such thing as a tease

It’s a porn lie. They’re selling you the idea of sexually forward women.

Or Hollywood Lolita pedo bullshit.

A ‘tease’ is what creeps say to attractive women who existed in their vicinity.

You are not entitled to sex. There’s no coy, they’re just not interested. In studies, these types of men have been proven to assume sexual interest from women where there was none, deluding themselves. Nobody is leading them on, but you have to humour the crazy to get away. Picture it like a hoodie approaching you asking for something. Be nice and get away.
They are being civilized, women are conditioned to smile, it’s polite.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/az1w3j/do_you_hate_it_when_women_on_the_streets_smile_at/

They’re such cowards they’ll literally body slam a woman, the weaker sex.
Literal assault.
You’re angry with men? Pick on your own sex.
But if they continue to physically assault women walking in public, they’ll get plenty of ‘sex’ in prison.

Things that make women evil, according to incels:

being female
(being male, too)
being male and looking female
being ambiguously male or female
looking at them
not looking at them
smiling at them
not smiling at them
being fat
being thin
being tall
being short
being smart
being dumb
being scientific
not being scientific
being soldiers
not being soldiers
being mothers
not being mothers
being wives
being single
being Christian
being atheist
having sex
not having sex
make-up
no make-up
fake nails
natural nails
expensive hairdo
crap hairdo
dressing feminine
not dressing feminine
curves
no curves
caring what men think
not caring what men think
having opinions
not having opinions
working hard
being lazy
voting
not voting
paying taxes
not paying taxes
having a job
being on welfare
being a boss
being married to a boss
paying for their own meal
not paying for their own meal
attention-whoring
avoiding them
oppressing them with relationships
not oppressing them with relationships
having kids, with anyone
having no kids, with anyone
race-mixing
not race-mixing
showing skin
wearing long skirts
posting bikini shots
not posting bikini shots
flirting randomly
not flirting
being clingy
being a cold-hearted bitch
getting emotional
having none of the feels

Need I go on? Clearly, women are not the problem.

Near the end of that long, long list:

killing your kids
making them pay child support
reporting rape
not reporting rape
being murdered
being alive

Maybe they just have anger issues? They are the most triggered people ALIVE.
Offended by literally anything.

But it isn’t misogyny!

They don’t HATE women, they just want single wives who are whorish virgins with all and no sexual XP, fertile but not too much, exactly the religious they are, a domestic slave that doesn’t need to be paid or sleep or work or clean or tend to babies while homesteading and living in the city because of the bars, with magical gravity defying tiddies despite breastfeeding at least 12 babies, all vaginal deliveries with no complications, tearing or stretch marks.

See? Totally reasonable.

She also never has periods (but fertile) and manages to keep a perfect figure, even throughout pregnancy and lactation.

It isn’t women they hate, just women who don’t live up to their standard, which totally existed in the ambiguous Past in the vague Culture they keep talking about [citation needed].

Because beggars can indeed be choosers and they choose the best.

Women are obviously entitled snowflakes who project because men are flawless and never wrong, that’s why their death rate is high, drug abuse is high, crime is high, mental problems are high and IQs are globally tanked.

The politics of all these wonderful male politicians has given us such a peaceful, logical society.

Women: exist
Incels: …bitch

Women are so IRRATIONAL, AREN’T THEY?

Yet another exciting round of ‘why everything is women’s fault even though men are statistically in charge’.

It’s like atheists with Christians but sex-specific, which isn’t even a choice.

What kind of Satanism is this? They must be operating from a spiritual void, but which one?

Don’t tread on me means don’t tell me to fucking smile, it’s weird. Nobody finds a man that insecure about a stranger’s facial expression charming.

Women are striking, you just don’t see it.

No future? Fine, no bother.

If men don’t wanna get married, the motivation for women giving a single shit what they “think” flutters out the window, drops and dies on the pavement.

If that were true, women would be having less sex than older generations at the same age. Check.

Women would be less likely to report as feminists? Check.

Women would be voting Brexit and Trump. Check.

Women would be focusing on career since men won’t be the provider? Check.

Women would be insulting men who refuse their gender role. Check.

Women wouldn’t sleep around because there’s nothing in it. Check.

All the damn checks. And you know the worst part?

They’re briefed on terrorists

Motive doesn’t matter. Public attacks matter.

https://www.rt.com/usa/462475-incels-threat-air-force-briefing/

They know something.

Wide scale plans online?

Whether the excuse was sex-based or not, incitement to attack random civilians is totally their purview.

So-called incels are not actually virgins and most virgins are happy about their lot. Incels aren’t getting as much sex (or rape) as they feel entitled to. You don’t have to be a virgin to be “incel”, stop.

comment

It shows you how soft people have become to blame others for their own mental illness.

Misogynists project their shadow onto women then try to destroy women. Doesn’t work. They screech like banshees and wonder why all men avoid them too. There’s no AA for sex, as uncabob said, try being attractive. Firstly, don’t be an abuser. These low IQ degenerates existed since the time of Bluebeard.

Their language is infantile aversion. Female? Female what? Smurf?

Scared of the mere word woman, bloody snowflakes.

If you keep threatening to kill the majority of a white population, a powerpoint is warranted.

comment

It’s all the woman’s fault. They have no respect for men. They destroy what they allegedly love. Sad, actually. Sad for men.

You don’t deserve respect for having a dick. You earn it.

We don’t love you, lazybones. Women are not your mother.

reply

No jobs, no prospects and then they blame women for not wanting to go out with them. Why don’t the Incels get mad at the economy instead?

That would require responsibility.

Growing up.

It’s sexist to ask Peter Pan to act his age.

Your death bed can’t hear excuses.

reply by a gamma

Men and women are not equal, they differ by a chromosome. Plus the argument that men should empathize with women because they are also human beings is rubbish.

Men are mutant women, have lower IQ and more criminals.

If we’re going red pill to oppress anyone, really wanna go there?

Thinks women aren’t human, wonders why they don’t love him.

You couldn’t make it up.

This is the fruit of child centred parenting.

The rotten, rotten fruit.

They’re so busy swallowing their own bullshit you’d think they were doing porn.

[citation needed] for every sweeping statement you can’t call them on

Like, female brain types exhibit cognitive benefits, they’re not even wrong.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/

Men have so many neurological pathologies precisely because of their mutant brain.

gamma 2

Thereby admitting that women are after our money?

What money? You’re an overgrown baby.

These guys needed to be bullied as a child. Severely. You can only beat out that level of stupidity.

reply by the sane

Sure they are. How else are you going to support the 4 children that you are all planning to have? This is all about your genes making it into the next generation – do you expect women to pay for you?

Their gender role, exactly.

This is not about survival, let’s be serious. It’s about luxury.

Not wanting to starve with a loser’s baby is a luxury!

This is why most men in history weren’t allowed to breed.

sane person

Well, even the male bird has to build the nest for the female bird to get interested in mating with him. That is what babies require.

No, but Incels want a family of their own with little chilblains.

Men are not entitled to female fertility, only rapists think so. They could adopt or hire a surrogate but they don’t want to spend any time with their own child raising it, let alone the “easy” work of being a full-time single parent on a huuuuuge welfare check. Narcissists shouldn’t breed.

What woman wouldn’t want them. In their life. Forever.

You are a woman I see. It is women like you that cause men distress.

Snowflakes.

Men built the world you live in, wimmin contributled eff all

Wrong and note, they themselves, also men, are useless eaters on other men (and women).

Women contributed children and so, everything men did.

Alexander the Great was only great because of his mother, read a book.

lucid commentator

Maybe weak men with weak psyche’s…

Men weak in character blame all but themselves. Since they can never be women, that’s the easy target.

The old term is wastrel.