Psychopaths will brag about anything.
I hope his kids fail too, fail to breed.
Just because he’s white and a man, people trust him with money.
Stop making business decisions on stereotypes, meritocracy is BLIND.
Psychopaths will brag about anything.
I hope his kids fail too, fail to breed.
Just because he’s white and a man, people trust him with money.
Stop making business decisions on stereotypes, meritocracy is BLIND.
Men are just disgusting most of the time now.
And raping a teenager who cannot run away has been let off scot free.
Her attorney Michael David also criticised the sentencing, saying:
We’re outraged. It’s complete injustice what happened today.
You can’t consent when you’re five foot three, 100 pounds and they’re both over six feet and very muscular.
They had her in handcuffs. These cops got a free pass.
If you can’t protect a teenager in handcuffs in a van WTF.
This is the issue with consent culture – it blames the victim however ridiculous the circumstances.
She was handcuffed. There were two of them.
It’s like the Prince Andrew girl, I’ve seen people try to DARVO that too.
“Oh but the real victim here is clearly the guy with all the power”
The assumption legally is that a person doesn’t want anything.
But the rapists know you cannot prove a negative.
That’s why they’re trying to flip it to presumed consent, an impossible model.
This is NOT Brave New World. I belong to me is libertarian, basic human rights. Everybody belongs to everybody is tyranny. It’s gang rape pretending to be consent. The mob insisting in Sodom they be allowed to rape the two angels. Mob consent > Victim. Very Communistic.
So what if a person takes a fancy? Doesn’t matter if it’s cop or prince. Personhood is being eroded for normalised transgressions of personal boundaries. This is a dystopia plot, where cops are legally allowed to rape handcuffed (kidnapped) suspects.
This is so r-selected it’s staggering.
A guy shows up and says property should be abolished, he should be treated like a King though, and women should be forced into marriage with violent adulterers (bigamists) who wanted a ‘legal’ form of Red Army rape because something something ‘love’.
The cage the monstrous leaders’ corpses were kept in is still up in Munster, good riddance.
“Soon Jan Matthys himself arrived, a tall, gaunt man with a long black beard. Matthys, aided by Bockelson, quickly became the virtual dictator of the town. The coercive Anabaptists had at last seized a city. The Great Communist Experiment could now begin.”
“Matthys called therefore for the execution of all remaining Catholics and Lutherans, but Knipperdollinck’s cooler head prevailed, since he warned Matthys that slaughtering all other Christians than themselves might cause the rest of the world to become edgy, and they might all come and crush the New Jerusalem in its cradle.
It was therefore decided to do the next best thing, and on February 27 the Catholic and Lutherans were driven out of the city, in the midst of a horrendous snowstorm.
Ah! The Russian method.
In a deed prefiguring communist Cambodia, all non-Anabaptists, including old people, invalids, babies and pregnant women were driven into the snowstorm,
Socialists do care – about themselves.
The grasshopper should’ve been left to starve in the story.
and all were forced to leave behind all their money, property, food and clothing. The remaining Lutherans and Catholics were compulsorily rebaptized, and all refusing this ministration were put to death.”
I think we’ll have to bring this back, the cage method.
You can see they deserved it.
“With every person drafted for siege work, Jan Matthys launched his totalitarian communist social revolution.
The first step was to confiscate the property of the expelled. All their worldly goods were placed in central depots, and the poor were encouraged to take “according to their needs,” the “needs” to be interpreted by seven appointed “deacons” chosen by Matthys.”
“When a blacksmith protested at these measures imposed by Dutch foreigners, Matthys arrested the courageous smithy. Summoning the entire population of the town, Matthys personally stabbed, shot, and killed the “godless” blacksmith”
Foreigners with a sense of entitlement.
Thank god we learned our lesson.
Multiculturalism is just a slow invasion.
“A key part of the Anabaptist reign of terror in Münster was now unveiled. Unerringly, just as in the case of the Cambodian communists four-and-a-half centuries later, the new ruling elite realized that the abolition of the private ownership of money would reduce the population to total slavish dependence on the men of power. And so Matthys, Rothmann and others launched a propaganda campaign that it was unchristian to own money privately; that all money should be held in “common,” which in practice meant that all money whatsoever must be handed over to Matthys and his ruling clique.”
Banks, we call them banks.
Strangely, they are run by a religion. Must be a coincidence.
“Food was confiscated from private homes, and rationed according to the will of the government deacons. Also, to accommodate the immigrants, all private homes were effectively communized, with everyone permitted to quarter themselves anywhere; it was now illegal to close, let alone lock, doors.
No such thing as burglary.
Communal dining-halls were established, where people ate together to readings from the Old Testament.
This compulsory communism and reign of terror was carried out in the name of community and Christian “love.””
White Sharia has already happened. For similar, low IQ reasons, it also failed.
There’s a reason nobody trusts missionaries.
They’re invaders holding a book, that isn’t better.
As you can see, it’s often much worse.
“All this communization was considered the first giant steps toward total egalitarian communism, where, as Rothmann put it, “all things were to be in common, there was to be no private property and nobody was to do any more work, but simply trust in God.” The workless part, of course, somehow never arrived.”
(((Wow))) imagine my shock. And iPhones would rain from the Heavens!
“everything which offends against love – all such things are abolished amongst us by the power of love and community.”
Anyone who tries to sell you on giving them power over you for weasel words like ‘love’ and ‘community’ is a dictator waiting to happen.
Tolerance is a sin, the Bible never tells you to tolerate evil, quite the opposite.
Outlawing “working for money” is intended to increase dependence.
Like unpaid internships and universal basic income today (and the welfare cliff).
Contrary to the God helps those who help themselves logic of the Bible, which didn’t see money as evil, merely love of it and greed at the expense of rights. Making tax-collectors and bankers Satan?
“For the Anabaptists boasted of their lack of education, and claimed that it was the unlearned and the unwashed who would be the elect of the world.”
“Early in May, Bockelson caught the attention of the town by running naked through the streets in a frenzy, falling then into a silent three-day ecstasy.”
Oh, to see that amygdala. Then the other immigrant friend takes over after Jan.
The first sexual revolution / religious rape / free love fest:
“The elders were now given total authority over the life and death, the property and the spirit, of every inhabitant of Münster. A strict system of forced labour was imposed, with all artisans not drafted into the military now public employees, working for the community for no monetary reward. This meant, of course, that the guilds were now abolished.
No work > Forced labour.
The totalitarianism in Münster was now complete. Death was now the punishment for virtually every independent act, good or bad. Capital punishment was decreed for the high crimes of murder, theft, lying, avarice, and quarreling!
Notable exception: rape.
That’s how you spot the rabbit.
Also death was decreed for every conceivable kind of insubordination: the young against their parents, wives against their husbands and, of course, anyone at all against the chosen representatives of God on earth, the totalitarian government of Münster. Bernt Knipperdollinck was appointed high executioner to enforce the decrees.
Interfering with family life? Doesn’t sound like the socialist teachers we know.
The only aspect of life previously left untouched was sex, and this now came under the hammer of Bockelson’s total despotism. The only sexual relation permitted was marriage between two Anabaptists. Sex in any other form, including marriage with one of the “godless,” was a capital crime. But soon Bockelson went beyond this rather old-fashioned credo, and decided to establish compulsory polygamy in Münster.
City-wide Communist immigrant-led gang rape. And it didn’t just happen one New Year’s Eve.
Which the Red Army would also replicate in Germany, centuries later. Except you get creepy guys idolizing Russia to this day and never mentioning that literal rape of Europe.
I’m sure they rationalized polygamy (really rape and adultery) as Christian duty (as if their bodies were property of the state) despite how the Bible expressly tells us not to marry.
Since many of the expellees had left their wives and daughters behind,
Münster now had three times as many marriageable women as men, so that polygamy had become technologically feasible.
Rabbits wait until most good men are war-dead (The Sexual Revolution happened after World Wars) or poor and desperate to make ends meet then make their move to take the women. By force. How omega.
R-types are just rapists waiting for an opening, a weakness in the native Ks. First they say “don’t defend your women” then it’s “your women?” They fail as husbands and fathers (they can’t even satisfy one wife and are permissive parents). Don’t trust so-called polygamists, usually they don’t believe in an age of consent – or, when given power, consent itself…
Bockelson converted the other rather startled preachers by citing polygamy among the patriarchs of Israel, as well as by threatening dissenters with death.
Won’t let us rape your daughter? Guess we’ll have to make her an orphan.
Basic principle of tribal war. All war being tribal.
Compulsory polygamy was a bit too much for many of the Münsterites, who launched a rebellion in protest. The rebellion, however, was quickly crushed and most of the rebels put to death.
Along with their conscience.
Execution was also the fate of any further dissenters. And so by August 1534, polygamy was coercively established in Münster.
He raped the city itself, ironic.
As one might expect, young Bockelson took an instant liking to the new regime, and before long he had a harem of 15 wives, including Divara, the beautiful young widow of Jan Matthys.
Bros before what now?
Typical r loyalty.
Anyone who wants a “harem” is basically announcing to the world they’re a rapist.
If all those women wanted to sleep with them, they already would be, by consent, and they wouldn’t want a harem, that kills their ‘lovers’ for leaving.
Remember, Genghis Khan was a very successful rapist.
So-called “conquerors” are the most anti-male icons going, that was some other man’s daughter, sister, wife, mother. Sex traitors.
The rest of the male population also began to take to the new decree as ducks to water. Many of the women did not take as kindly to the new dispensation, and so the elders passed a law ordering compulsory marriage for every women under (and presumably also over) a certain age, which usually meant being a compulsory third or fourth wife.
Rape gangs writing the law.
Thank god we know better now.
Moreover, since marriage among the godless was not only invalid but also illegal, the wives of the expellees now became fair game, and were forced to “marry” good Anabaptists.
This is why you shoot deserters. If they’d betray their country and flee, what right do they have to come back to this?
Refusal to comply with the new law was punishable, of course, by death, and a number of women were actually executed as a result. Those “old” wives who resented the new wives coming into their household were also suppressed, and their quarreling was made a capital crime. Many women were executed for quarreling.
Anyone trying to shut up women is going to censor men too.
But the long arm of the state could reach only just so far and, in their first internal setback, Bockelson and his men had to relent, and permit divorce.
Polygamists are always for easy divorce and multiple re-marriage.
Actually re-marriage is the way they’re hoping to lube society up for it.
Because it isn’t a meaningful, loving commitment unless you can get out of it. And into it. And out. And shake it all about.
Indeed, the ceremony of marriage was now outlawed totally,
and divorce made very easy. As a result, Münster now fell under a regime of what amounted to compulsory free love. And so, within the space of only a few months, a rigid puritanism had been transmuted into a regime of compulsory promiscuity.”
This is what happens if you leave r-selected men in charge.
Chaos. Degenerate chaos. Learn from this lesson of history.
When the SJWs complain about male rule being violent, unfair and incompetent, they refer to r-men. The narcissism of small differences.
“Jan Bockelson seized this opportunity to carry his “egalitarian” communist revolution one step further: he had himself named king and Messiah of the Last Days.”
The Old and New Testaments were specifically written so we’d know to kill these little-dicked despots.
“It often happens with “egalitarians” that a hole, a special escape hatch from the drab uniformity of life, is created – for themselves.”
Communism for all! Except Party members – luxuries for them.
Rule by rapists.
“As soon as he proclaimed the monarchy, the prophet Dusentschur announced a new divine revelation: all who persisted in disagreeing with or disobeying King Bockelson would be put to death, and their very memory blotted out. They would be extirpated forever. Some of the main victims to be executed were women: women who were killed for denying their husbands their marital rights,
rapists, not husbands
for insulting a preacher, or for daring to practice bigamy – polygamy, of course, being solely a male privilege.”
Ah, the insecure double standards of the r-male. You can tell a polygamist is bad in bed when he won’t let his wife sleep with anyone else. But monogamy cannot exist one-way, morons, it’s a single bond between two. There’s no such thing as half loyal to your military either.
Male privilege, huh? The real thing, finally!
As we can see, some males belong on the bottom of the ladder, with no heirs, they’d destroy civilization otherwise.
We are not like bonobos, trust no one who says we were, more like a biological cross between gorilla and chimp.
“So that the king and his nobles might live in high luxury, rigorous austerity was imposed on everyone else in Münster. The subject population had already been robbed of their houses and much of their food; now all superfluous luxury among the masses was outlawed. Clothing and bedding were severely rationed, and all “surplus” turned over to King Bockelson under pain of death. Every house was searched thoroughly and 83 wagonloads of “surplus” clothing collected.
Anytime they tax actual food, you’re entering dystopia.
It is not surprising that the deluded masses of Münster began to grumble at being forced to live in abject poverty while the king and his courtiers lived in extreme luxury on the proceeds of their confiscated belongings. And so Bockelson had to beam them some propaganda to explain the new system. The explanation was this: it was all right for Bockelson to live in pomp and luxury because he was already completely dead to the world and the flesh. Since he was dead to the world, in a deep sense his luxury didn’t count. In the style of every guru who has ever lived in luxury among his credulous followers, he explained that for him material objects had no value. How such “logic” can ever fool anyone passes understanding.
Celebrities claiming they’re just like you but shouldn’t be taxed like you (nor their films).
Claiming diversity is good and making expensive efforts to avoid it.
I can see how the pseudologic would work.
More important, Bockelson assured his subjects that he and his court were only the advance guard of the new order; soon, they too would be living in the same millennial luxury.
All talk, like Elon “I’m gonna move to Mars” Musk.
Who happens to be a socialist, coincidentally.
And promises the journey to his new kingdom will be “fun” (creep code for orgies). Don’t get on the ship, folks, if you value your holes.
Logically, the greatest good for all would be letting his staff form a union…
Under their new order, the people of Münster would forge outward, armed with God’s will, and conquer the entire world, exterminating the unrighteous, after which Jesus would return and they would all live in luxury and perfection. Equal communism with great luxury for all would then be achieved.”
I’m reminded of Richard Spencer.
Magically prosperous (but anti-merit) ethnostate.
Or Mars. Space Eden. For people too smart to believe in a Savior.
The stars are a nice touch.
“Despite his continual preaching about marching forth to conquer the world, King Bockelson was not crazy enough to attempt that feat, especially since the bishop’s army was again besieging the town.”
Ah, the cowardice! Predictable as a Tottenham match.
“Finally, Bockelson, long fascinated with the theatre, ordered his starving subjects to engage in three days of dancing and athletics. Dramatic performances were held, as well as a Black Mass. Starvation, however, was now becoming all-pervasive.”
“To guard against such a threat, Bockelson stepped up his reign of terror still further. In early May, he divided the town into 12 sections, and placed a “duke” over each one with an armed force of 24 men. The dukes were foreigners like himself; as Dutch immigrants they were likely to be loyal to Bockelson.”
This is why your ancestors never trusted foreigners with promises.
Reminds me of EU “member states” and the region planning.
Why do they want a full army?
“Bockelson would undoubtedly have let the entire population starve to death rather than surrender”
Anyone who has to tell you they’re caring, isn’t.
“As for ex-King Bockelson, he was led about on a chain, and the following January, along with Knipperdollinck, was publicly tortured to death, and their bodies suspended in cages from a church tower.”
They’re still there, the cages.
If only they were women, they’d have instantly been clocked as witches. The vices gave them away as Satanic.
This is why men should distrust other men, especially socialists.
Their luxury comes from your labour.
Today it’s called the Labour party.
This is really about men, he doesn’t really mean white women.
All he does is call white guys oppressed.
Middle-class American white males.
That is literally all he does.
The men who live like Kings compared to world history.
Men need useful role models, not shrinks! Give me a soldier, a sailor, a candle-stick maker! All more useful than him! The Elon Musk fandom is less obnoxious.
They bring up COAL MINERS. Yes, that is totally valid to 99.99% of the modern male population, you poor little pussy.
Shrinks see people as defective. Obviously he doesn’t believe his paying customers have privilege, or they wouldn’t want him to fix them!
It might as well be: Horse-drawn carriage salesman debunks automobiles!
If they feel genuinely good about themselves, it’s game over for him. He needs you DEPENDENT.
He doesn’t even acknowledge that men are privileged in many respects, biologically.
No, I don’t mean IQ because the variance is too high and if you don’t exclude poor men, like academia does (studying themselves), they’re slightly below women.
They have greater lung capacity, handy for endurance.
Greater upper body strength, better for self-defense.
Their brain can focus better but modern habits pollute this.
They’re more likely to get hired or considered competent at work, even if they dress up.
They attract fewer stalkers and are less likely to be drugged at a bar.
If they’re friendly, it’s less likely seen as flirty.
They don’t listen to that of course. After all, it never happened to them. Because they’ve never been a woman.
Bitch Shield is just “please don’t think I’m flirting” mode.
Ugly men get away with a lot more socially than ugly women. Ugly men are not told to alter their expectations at all and this gives them license to behave badly. Many don’t even know they’re ugly.
They’re taken more seriously in their opinions (another invisible one). I go anonymous online all the time so yes it’s very much a thing, start a fake female account (just the name like Gigi) and post the same opinions (avoid one topic: not about the sexes) and random ‘actually’ men will suddenly start nitpicking what is literally common sense compared to if you’re called something uniquely male like Greg, when they’ll be friendly. Calling a woman stupid is not attractive to us but they do not get this. Be prepared to be called “bitch” and “cunt” a lot too, in lieu of rebuttal. They’ll do this while admitting women are more sensitive and should be treated delicately (idiots). It’s called ‘dick move’ for this reason. They can be civil and logical – they just don’t want to. It’s male PMS.
Sizes are typically based on men and fit male waists.
Clinical trials are almost entirely men and medications are designed to work well for them (lower risk of dying).
Anatomy diagrams are typically male and models too. It’s obvious when you look at the torso, rib cage and heart size especially.
Should they feel bad about these differences when not explicitly chosen? NO.
And that’s the difference. We just want to be treated fairly on many counts (like perceived competence for the same work). We want to be on their level, the higher level.
White privilege exists too, I’d choose to be born with that cultural birthright because it’s amazing.
The difference is you don’t self-loathe based on something you were born.
One reason we hate multiculturalism is that non-whites tend to oppress us for being white in our homelands and we have no homeland to be privileged in anymore. It’s like living in a foreign colony of Europe instead of the real thing. They have theirs, it’s still there and they can return to it, we just want ours. It’s the defining (social capital) quality of homeland as a legal right that we enjoy in-group privilege on it as natives. So they try to shame you about that same thing.
And it doesn’t mean the non-whites are owed anything or can (ironically) use it as excuse to dehumanize you.
I see so often with Peterson disciples this cognitive dissonance
“Men don’t have any privilege because (anecdote or twisted irrelevant detail)”
(note: no biology)
“Well, men are just better, it’s science” (and they mean biology, despite it not working like that)
Even within men, their biological differences vary.
Regular soldier? More muscle, the better.
Sniper, someone who needs stealth? That’ll harm you.
It’s like they formulated this guy’s bit in the lab.
“But what about men?” like that’s a new line, come now
the constant implications of “…They’re so oppressed.” Well they’re hardly in death camps, are they? It’s so shrill. It’s the most spoiled incarnation of oppression I’ve ever seen. Like poor people or white people in general don’t suffer more, it’s obscene in its obliviousness. Are they being trafficked into sex slavery?
Okay, hypothetically let’s say they were, but then if that’s inherent (because it’s implied nothing can be done to fully remedy this) then that’s calling an entire sex inferior and again, not how biology works. Humans are dimorphic because we need both qualities, it’s apples and oranges.
Still, we’re stuck on fallacies of irrelevance (actually, men are more likely to get sole custody when they request it than women, MRAs lie about their data all the time and get butthurt if you point it out) and category errors (men and women aren’t meant to be the same).
If you’re gonna be a broken record on a topic, actually say something.
Don’t just complain or dismiss. Put forth new material.
He never does this, he absorbs other people’s points like a black hole.
He’s a debate Hydra. If the journalists asked him neutral questions, he’d have nothing to spin.
Replace girls with guys and same applies here.
Seeming smarter than stupid journalists is NOT intelligence, is it?
They don’t give a damn about poor men and use them like a rhetorical shiv while they sit all comfy behind their keyboards sipping shitty Starbucks coffee. Sex traitors, classist bastards.
If Peterson were so oppressed, he’d be fired. Most billionaires would be women. Most politicians would be women. Sanitary products wouldn’t be considered a luxury. Female comedians would joke about raping men and tell them to get over it, like that crime is a guaranteed laughriot. The list goes on. Research if your point is simple to debunk before making a fool of yourself because men (as a group) have many advantages and some of them are biological.
That is what privilege means.
The SJW twists this by making it into a paradigm of shame like original sin but usually it has nothing to do with women (more biology side) and Peterson is using the SJW paradigm of white guilt. This is notable.
He encourages your laziness. White men aren’t great, are they? You could say they ain’t shit.
Don’t bother being proud of your forefathers or civilization.
Don’t take action, healthy message. Especially in the West today. Don’t improve things for your people, like all the great white people of history, you aren’t privileged but you really don’t need to be, he implies. Because he believes in the experiment of multiculturalism – the slowest civil war.
Grasping at relevance, huh?
I’m not gonna link since that’d be throwing money at it.
Here’s the comment I made, which sums it up nicely.
Actually women have been the sex voting more rightward in Europe and recent trends in voting have made women swing conservative in general (over men) but Roosh has never let facts intrude on a piece of ‘satire’. Just look at recent elections and referenda, and still he …blames women, a majority of the population with enough numbers to swing it. American women are not typical of the world’s supply and Europeans are sick of reading that particular lie. Essentially, he’s arguing to strip low-commitment, low-loyalty r-types of the right to vote, without naming the r-type (because he is one). We used to do that with property requirements, since r-types are nomadic and property taxes were the only taxes (so you vote for where your money goes or don’t vote). That was not equal, but fair. Also, it wasn’t ‘women’s suffrage’ but universal, women’s suffrage is a feminist myth. Learning history is hard when male power-trip fantasy is so much more alluring than looking at the demographics data of recent elections.
I forgot to mention Millennial women are more conservative than their living predecessors.
And Gen Z are heavily conservative too.
Facts are hard when you’re a degenerate liar.
From here on out it’s an explanation of the r-psychology, with Roosh as Exhibit Gay. [this definition] It’s bitchy to match their level since, if you’re going to attack people randomly, expect them to get defensive.
A little on Europe.
The First World is the only place its values exist in the universe, we developed these with major wars, some civil wars and major historical reformations and enlightenments. We earned this way of life. These people, historical enemies, stepped into our house (without invitations) and took all the goodies paid for with our ancestor’s blood. They expect to get more than they give and skip the country whenever they like, owing us nothing. They’re already on thin ice with their treatment of our too-kind Christian hospitality (from pathological altruism, still finite ). Anyone questions these fundamentals and we come down on them like a ton of bricks. This is OURS, get bent. They totally deserve that rejection for rejecting what makes us, Us, and therefore worthy of their pillaging, because if they want to sample Non-First World living, go ahead. Good riddance. Except those people are narcissists and can’t stand to think of the First World being happy. They’re toxic civilization-breakers. Fifth columnists, saboteurs and snitches.
Like we’re all too dumb to notice the past and present runnings of our native countries. All hundreds of millions of us in civilized Europe. And yes, we need the advice of foreign mystery meat! Because white men in Europe are incompetent, right Roosh?
Everything about Europe was shit until you got here!! For millennia we have struggled! Thank the gods you’ve finally arrived! You’ve been so good for the people of every nation you’ve ‘banged’!
Common sense would argue:
If some people are unworthy of First World rights, simply deport them to where they belong.
Not all countries or its genetic Volk can uphold the glories of First World liberty. OK. Not everyone can be smart enough or capable enough to run things to the highest known standard.
Everyone will be better off! Everyone will be happier! We’ll stop trying to turn a cat into a dog by putting a leash on it and truly embrace cultural diversity! …except the narcissists. Who are only happy when this applies: misery loves company. Basically, never take a narcissist’s advice on the Good Thing To Do. They lack the empathy. Relational narcissism is a thing.
Which country is the Sodom of our times? The one we should take as a negative case study? The one who started this Melting Pot shit? The one obsessed with materialism, gangster culture and money?
America is the paragon of patriarchal virtues! Let’s all listen to those guys!
You don’t get a pat on the head for doing your adult duties.
Seriously, the US must have all its statute up online like the Parliament website.
I’ve seen various congressional and state ruling paperwork, but they never go over it and examine their priors.
I would myself but then I’ll be accused of bias for being both foreign and female.
I have however broken down election data on my own country, various demographic data by race, sex and age. The biggest predictor? AGE. Increasing the voting age or bringing in military service for everyone adult prior to voting (not ageist) would work better. But damn, they might have to stop valiantly defending the West from their keyboard for five minutes and pick up a gun.
Why be masculine when you can make a career out of talking about it?
These people brag about having multiple passports but they aren’t traitors, no!
They complain about terrorism and demand government Do Something. Well traditionally, they’d form an army out of you….
They expect a White Saviour (like Trump)… but hate on white nationalism, in white-spawned countries.
So he contents himself to crawl around waiting for approval by mimicking Vox Day (that won’t work, VD is a respected author).
They could earn some passing respect by actually looking at the damn data.
-they don’t know how. Idiots
-they don’t care. Liars
There’s a distinct 3rd possibility.
They did, didn’t find the answer they wanted, and due to publication bias, left it in the drawer.
If he sets foot on most European soil after that article, he could easily be up on human rights charges.
Satire doesn’t mean what you think it means. Calling FIRE in a theatre is still illegal. Mumbling the adult equivalent of ‘just kidding’ will make the judges angry. The male judges.
Well, he’s questioning the legal structure of foreign governments and suggesting an oppression – because oppression doesn’t exist. On incitement or sedition grounds alone, he could just disappear. That would be 100% his fault. It’s like stepping into a tiger enclosure and expecting not to get eaten. You do not bully the bigger guy, even if he seems tame. Ignorance of the ECJ law or EU law in general won’t be an excuse if the feminists (rightfully, for once) in this case, get you arrested for being a misogynist (stripping women of rights is A-grade proof in court, practically a working definition for the prosecution and he has not met the Burden of Proof for a ‘debate’ aside from hand-waving and emotional appeal, which does quite add to the misogyny thing). It cannot be simultaneously all A Joke and All A Serious Debate, depending which lawn looks safer today. Serious clowns do not exist. The fact it’s about running The West, to which he does not truly belong, means the American Free Speech shit does not apply.
Rights belong to citizens. Citizens are loyal and dutiful and don’t oppress their peers, their legal equals. Oddly he is legally arguing that women have their citizenship rights revoked, the only way to restrict liberties, but in other materials, borders are just an idea (HBD says no). R-types always lie, even if they tell a truth it’s in bad faith to manipulate a 3rd party. It’s easy to spot by who says you’re too dumb to handle the data yourself…
It’s like he doesn’t know who Britain’s favourite person is. Nor how much power the monarchy have in Europe, let alone their common sex.
If they can murder their Muslim-breeding daughter-in-law, they can murder you.
European men don’t spend most of their free time bitching about the opposite sex, including those who live in America. We still remember the sexes need to get along for the race or species to survive. The culture clash is making even the redpill male friends of mine cringe away from these ‘losers’ explaining away their undesirability and start siding with the feminists, ‘in theory’.
He’s also clearly creeping to sex slavery of all women by revoking First World liberties aka AA with sex for ‘incel’ males (incels do not exist).
Is that the Muslim genes or the Jewish ones coming out? A harem system like Asia leads to war and over time fewer women anyway since they’re murdered post-birth. And the guys running a harem are military. And rich. Aka none of the things these bitches could be. They’re also atheists so all appeals to Muh Bible fall flat.
The misogynist-pointers at Biblical verse are actually quoting Judaism or referencing a blend of its pantheon with Eve (that is blasphemy), based on the Jewish character of Lilith.
AKA nothing to do with Christians.
It’s as trite as the MGTOW cry of White men! Abandon your women! Never reproduce!* They want the brown ones anyway! We’ll gladly take them off your hands brother! They’re whores anyway, that’s why rape doesn’t exist!
*That’s how you can tell they’re ideologically aligned with SJWs.
Sex positive? Check.
They really haven’t looked up Iceland, have they?
‘The next year, “Iceland’s parliament passed a law guaranteeing equal rights for women and men.”
This was over something MINOR.
Fathers do not work as many hours as mothers, you can look it up but none of you will breed so thankfully it doesn’t matter to you. Childrearing and housekeeping are not fun, they are laborious or men would be lining up to do it and get paid.
You disrespect the valuable work women do, they strike. Which sex does the survival of the species rely on? Which sex is the primary caregiver? Which hand rocks the cradle? This is DARWIN. Kipling said ‘the female of the species is deadlier than the male’…. why do you think that is, Kemosabe?
If men are in fact superior, hypothetically…(the literal misogynist’s unscientific position to dehumanize women and strip us of agency/liberty, when they/we are merely sexually dimorphic) then logically at least most of what the feminists say must be true, since in nature the stronger dominates the weaker. This would necessitate the weaker to rightfully defend themselves. Choose your own ending, moron.
If you haven’t read the Bible, you may want to mull over why it’s women in the verse ‘Hell hath no fury…’
Consider very carefully if you wish to fuck with a strong majority of the globe, r-type scum.
It’s the Pandora’s Box of civilization. Because if the men all rally together, that obscures other topics like race, religion, age bracket, even partisanship! Convenient for self-aware r-types trying to get in with the Ks for protecting before the fighting starts (a kind of warfare cuckoldry, hiding safely behind the lines and letting the Real Men fight for you like a dusky damsel). And choosing as your opponents the one group that can’t match you in physical strength…. brave. They wouldn’t dare punch another man, but they’re happy to start on women, assuming we’ll never fight back. Yeah, they’re idyllic defenders of The West…. hiding behind other men. Usually white men. Brave and strong and independent little rebels.
The feminists want a ‘Gender War’ – because men are going to lose.
World War G.
Men don’t even play well with one another. An all-male island would be a bloodbath. There’s no historical example of it. Sparta punished bachelors with a special tax. Roosh just wants to hide away until white men have taken white women’s rights away (temporarily) to increase his mating chances, especially if those men (superior competition) die in the process. Typical r-strategy, shout, run and hide. They have literally nothing to lose.
The r-type calls for things and asks you to do them for it.
Sorry, are you all his wife suddenly? He can’t even find one woman to agree to legally bind herself to him and his money, obviously he’s defective. He cannot run a single household and he has no child investments, he has no idea how to run a society (especially one of the outgroup, racially). Ghetto trash has more family values than Roosh V.
Let’s you and him fight – the cowardly r-type strategy of triangulation, to befriend the victor and free up resources (here, women). Let’s you and her fight – a level of scumbag that isn’t human(e). If men win, befriend men and take credit as Idea Guy for rewards (given women like goats). If women win, most men are dead, take excess supply of women – whether they want to be or not (smells like rape o’clock). You can move the rape genes to civilization but you can’t civilize rape genes.
Men, seriously. Anyone calling for a fight who isn’t willing to lead it is trying to kill you.
Western men are too soft to survive. HE KNOWS THIS.
He wants to kill your genes and your culture.
Traitor in our midst.
Eggs = expensive. Sperm = cheap. Foreva….
Finally, in fantasy land of Xenu Warrior Princes.
What happens if men ‘win’ but no woman will reproduce with them?
Unless you’re a happy genetic suicide like Roosh V, who can’t buy a wife with all his shekels, don’t listen to it?
He’s goading you to attack your future. This is all painfully obvious to women thanks to EQ. We know a conniving traitorous bitch when we see one. However, it’s unfair to call someone a traitor per se, when they were never one of us. Look up his background.
Okay, that is pretty accurate. There are more I can think of but I won’t derail.
I am surprised. I did not expect things that have been quantified e.g. interruptions in speaking studies, although men do speak as much by volume as women.
I think I can condense it down to two things.
First, they are usually treated as individuals rather than representatives of their sex.
Secondly, their comfort level is usually a default, so they don’t even notice it e.g. usually it’s a man in charge, so odds are he’ll also be heterosexual and therefore not creepily hit on you because you need his help. They don’t notice these things because, being men, they aren’t placed in those situations. It isn’t their fault when they’re naive to these things, as we’re naive to some of their insights. Fish in water problem. I wouldn’t call those privileges except for where they directly benefit at the expense of women for no other reason than birth (anti-meritocratic, sexual nepotism). However, to ignore that fact that Bad Things Happen in the world isn’t an excuse, and to deny them on any grounds inhumane. We founded society for the continual betterment of its inhabitants, that requires listening as much as we talk.
The ones about children irritate me because they’re based on received wisdom aka wrong but antique BS. Children require a nuclear family, minimum, to thrive best. An extended family is ideal but impractical. Both parents need to be involved and co-parenting isn’t feminist (that would be arguing children only need their mothers, against the evidence). It’s common sense that both sexes bring different traits to the table their child needs to benefit from, to say nothing of the two sexes OF child and the range of bonding required between the same-sex parent and the opposite sex through the stages of development. How can we build stable families in the West if we don’t work together? First, this requires communication, and that is two-thirds listening and one-third e-prime (not blaming, based on perceptions) e.g. I feel you are, You seem to be etc. Conflict resolution rather than escalation. Plenty of people nowadays cannot debate, certainly, but they cannot argue in their personal lives either. If you’re still angry, pick a violent hobby. Boxing is always popular.
Can I make the easy joke that the man was the better feminist?
I don’t see why a study of human differences has to be considered ‘feminist’ when really it’s actually a subject called BIOLOGY. If you want to be precise, much of this would come under social psychology and forensics.
It’s weird to see men, who usually go around spouting off on how different the sexes are, suddenly deny it whenever the feminists rarely admit it. Guys. They are by definition different.
These may not be sex differences a la HBD but that makes them no less valid. Social phenomena are important, from crime all the way to how people treat one another in a professional (supposedly non-personal) setting.
Fathers used to have a tendency to goof off in the upper class because they hired a retinue of staff to take their place. Not just women but also various men to teach and train their children, the tutor being the classic example. And no, the TV doesn’t count. If you can’t be there you shouldn’t have them, this goes for both parents although there is such a thing as too much Mummy, flexitime is the future, economically and socially. It’s no surprise that raising kids in a vacuum will screw them up, that isn’t one sexes fault, all of society is at fault (that means both).
In Victorian times, men began abandoning their families for drink in more urban pubs and bars, ‘throwing themselves away’ on it, and the modern vision of single parenthood emerged because the father was unconscious or …elsewhere. Addictions were common in men and excused for abandoning them on the regular because children were not considered full people, in part to deal with their mortality rate. Sometimes the women would die in childbirth, which is hardly their fault. Rarely one spouse would run away, often to America.
It is true that if men want the social power of the Master of the House, they need to be held to the highest moral standard. No affairs, no abuse, no addictions, the obvious. If they cared about their children above an egoistic promotion, they would spend their free time with them rather than playing the bachelor life (do you think the kids don’t notice?) I love the money excuse, when you can lose more with a promotion by moving into a higher tax bracket and in getting paid less per hour for the longer hours you’re expected to work. That isn’t an excuse and it misses the point deliberately. The studies have shown time and time again that children will always value time above money assuming a lower-middle class level of comfort. It’s an odd example of men trying to Have It All, or seem to, by having Work he hates, Wife he tolerates, Children he abandons and a debauched social life he pretends is good for his family, let alone himself.
How often do you hear parenting tips for mothers? All of parenting books and TV shows and so on, tend to lecture to women. It isn’t pandering, it’s telling us we’re faulty and need ‘experts’ plugging a book to tell us how to do the most basic human functions, it’s like eating! They lecture us, it’s trashy anyway.
How often do you hear lectures on fatherhood, and purposefully, what a good father is?
Almost like modern society is against happy families, because they fill that emotional void with credit-purchased crap on Black Friday.
But that’s none of my business America.
And no, telling men not to abandon their kids after willingly reproducing is not advice. For all the mean stereotypes, the black family model used to be quite stable with the Church before the men went out for mistresses a la the faux Bachelor Life. I’m sure on their death beds, they’ll regret going to less strip-clubs and paying for less drinks at a bar.