Aging fathers, ugly kids

That’s one solid explanation for why people are generally uglier nowadays, even the healthy weight.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311035

Paternal age negatively predicts offspring physical attractiveness in two, large, nationally representative datasets

Freeze your sperm at 18 for optimum freshness.

Effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness is investigated in two datasets.

Various covariates are utilized.

Significant negative effects are found in both datasets.

Effects are independent of birth order.

Findings consistent with paternal age as a source of new mutations in offspring.

Abstract

The effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness has recently been investigated. Negative effects are predicted as paternal age is a strong proxy for the numbers of common de novo mutations found in the genomes of offspring. As an indicator of underlying genetic quality or fitness, offspring attractiveness should decrease as paternal age increases, evidencing the fitness-reducing effects of these mutations.

That’s a hard rectal red pill.

I’m sure the manosphere will try its hardest to ignore like the dead and defective babies.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

The problem is, you think you have time.

Thus far results are mixed, with one study finding the predicted effect, and a second smaller study finding the opposite. Here the effect is investigated using two large and representative datasets (Add Health and NCDS),

holy Jesus a sound method

I almost fell off my high horse

both of which contain data on physical attractiveness and paternal age.

Validity! Validity! My queendom for some statistical validity!

The effect is present in both datasets, even after controlling for maternal age at subject’s birth, age of offspring, sex, race, parental and offspring (in the case of Add Health) socio-economic characteristics, parental age at first marriage (in the case of Add Health) and birth order.

The confound control is practically orgasmic, I can’t wait to see how they mansplain this one away.

That is perfect method. But it triggers butthurts and their precious feefees are hurt by the mere implication that degenerate older dads are bad for their kid’s health. Because all those upper crust respectable 1950s dads were like “60 is the new 20 lol!” Who gives a shit if your kids need you past high school? You got more priceless clubbing times you don’t remember, that’s what really matters. Not seeing your grandkids.

Class, race, sex, age at marriage, birth order, maternal age, offspring age – there’s literally nothing else to control for. Nothing. It’s flawless.

THESE. ARE. THE. STUDIES. WE. NEED.

Logically, since women are born with most of their eggs, there wouldn’t be a maternal effect. It isn’t constantly replenishing like the male gamete. Cell division’s a bitch. Male lifestyle for all his years prior

https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/dads-smoking-before-conception-harms-kids/

affects the child at conception (and even which sperm is conceived) far more than the details of pregnancy (minus pollutants it’s pretty much the same as in ancient times, the womb is not a new environment).

Maybe add child health although those studies already exist to cross-reference with attractiveness?

As in, are the girls more womanly as adults in WHR and the boys have more manly frames (broad shoulders, narrow waist, which should be a metric of its own)? Or less gender typical? Even androgynous, or fully gender-atypical?

Do younger or older fathers produce better-looking kids in the gendered sense?

[We can tell by looking at old photos but let’s pretend.]

Give me a time machine, please. The ugly wigger types hurt my eyes.

[I have also noted mannish looking sisters tend to be the older, “ugly” sister of two -coughs Beatrice- and the girly looking brothers tend to be the younger, usually gay one. Cannot unsee.]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682

e.g.

“In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.”

The beard can also be a sign of poor grade genes e.g. savages, wolf man. Overall bone structure uber alles.

Maybe factor in sexual activity of the father prior to conception? Especially partner count and STDs. STDs are known to harm attractiveness in the host [coughs David Beckham, most of Hollywood] so why not the offspring’s?

Back to the top study:

The apparent robustness of the effect to different operationalizations of attractiveness suggests high generalizability, however the results must be interpreted with caution, as controls for parental levels of attractiveness were indirect only in the present study.

aka please don’t sue us but you know it’s true

But you can wait forever because the Jews said so!

Say, who owns all the biotech and IVF companies?

https://www.fertilitybridge.com/blog/2018/4/11/battleforivfmarketwallstreetvsprivatepractice

[chuckles in Israel shekels]

https://hmcisrael.com/specialty/ivf-israel/

“According to statistics, around 20% of couples wishing to conceive are faced with certain obstacles that inhibit a successful pregnancy.

Fertility Treatment is one of the most prioritized fields of medicine in Israel.”

Sure, you can wait for decades! Also, cut the kid when they’re born!

We need more future little Viagra users.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/2648044

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7752-female-genital-mutilation-can-cause-infertility/

Does Circumcision Decrease the Fertility of Sperm in the Male?

“However, birth rates are much higher in countries where the men are predominantly uncircumcised.”

There is no question that an uncircumcised man has a cooler penis than a circumcised man in the flaccid state. For some reason, removal of the foreskin is the reason for this. There seems to be some sort of temperature sensor in the foreskin that may control penile temperature. Removing the foreskin gets rid of this sensor.

It only takes a few temperature degrees of difference to damage sperm. As the penis is in close proximity to the testicles, it’s quite likely that a cooler penis would help keep the testicles cooler (Remember that men are more potent in the colder months of the year). Under these condition, if the testicles got too cold, they can always be retracted closer to the body.

Almost like God gave men a prepuce solely for this evolutionary function in reproduction.

…Now consider this: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have the same penis temperature on full erection, as we stated earlier in this article. So, clearly, there is a specific reason why a natural-uncircumcised penis remains at a cooler temperature during the flaccid state. When the penis is erect it is no longer in close proximity with the testicles, so penile temperature should not affect the testicular temperature at this phase (be the penis circumcised or uncircumcised).

Upon orgasm, the penis tends to retract more into the pelvis (at least with my experience). Due to the friction and increased blood flow that occurred during the sexual act, it makes sense that the penis will have an increase in temperature in a flaccid state post-sex than in a flaccid state previous to the sexual act. Could this retraction be another mechanism for the “heated” penis to steer clear of the testicles?

Go there, science.

Circumcision and Male Fertility: Is There a Link?

Scientists have recently concluded that circumcision can help with infertility in males suffering from two very specific diseases.

So… not generalizable.

Some woman perv studies after all that penis talk.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000269

Women’s faces and voices may be cues to their reproductive potential. If so, then individual differences in indices of female fecundity and residual reproductive value, such as hormonal profiles, body composition, and age, should be associated with women’s facial and vocal attractiveness to men. However, previous research on these associations is sparse, has rendered mixed results, and is limited to Western samples. The current study therefore explored relationships between correlates of reproductive capability (testosterone levels, age, and body mass index [BMI]) and facial and vocal attractiveness in women from industrial and foraging societies. Women’s facial and vocal attractiveness was associated with each of these indicators in at least one of the two samples. The patterns of these associations suggest that women’s faces and voices provide cues to both common and unique components of reproductive potential and help explain the evolution of men’s mating preferences.

Lesson: Avoid the manjaw.

Women change their vocal pitch all the time though. European women are taught to make it lower at school (speak up = louder, lower pitch), Asians try to make it higher. The key is how they sound when hysterically upset. That’s their true level. Europeans go up, Asians down.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000475

Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history—number of children and pregnancies—in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not.

So partnered, married women. Not single ones.

Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features—facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.

Menopause is not the face equalizer you think.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816302318

African and European perception of African female attractiveness

Dare you to do the same study with every race judging every other.

Majority of research on attractiveness is restricted to faces of European origin. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across communities due to variations in both facial morphology and local standards of beauty. We investigated the relative contribution of four facial markers of attractiveness based on 101 female facial portraits (standardized, non-manipulated) from Cameroon and Namibia, which were assessed by local male raters and by raters from a distant European population, the Czech Republic. Images from Cameroon include only women of Bantu origin, while Namibians are represented by women of both Bantu (Owambo/Herero) and Nama origin. While controlling for age and BMI, we explored the relationship between female attractiveness and a set of facial traits: fluctuating asymmetry, averageness, shape sexual dimorphism, and skin color (rated and measured in CIELab color space).

In the Cameroonian sample, local male raters favored lighter-skinned female faces with morphology closer to average. The attractiveness of Nama women as rated by Nama men positively correlated with lighter complexion, but this did not extend to rating by Cameroonian men. The attractiveness of Namibian Owambo/Herero women was positively associated with facial femininity and lighter complexion when judged by both Cameroonian and Nama male raters. In all samples, the attractiveness as rated by Czech men was predicted by age and BMI, but not by skin color. We found no significant association between attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry in any of the tested samples. When controlling for age, the effect of skin color on attractiveness turned to be non-significant in the Owambo/Herrero and Nama sample, but remained significant in the Cameroonian sample. Variations in skin color thus represent an important factor of African female attractiveness within the African context, but they do not seem to affect judgements made by European raters.

They don’t want any of them.

Sensitivity to some facial markers of female attractiveness thus seems to be restricted to regional populations and/or constrained by shared ethnicity.

Paler women have more oestrogen. So duh.

Women reject old guys who’d give them dead or ugly kids:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816301283

“This finding is consistent with men’s stated preference for young, fertile women in mating and suggests that the typical pattern is generated by women’s limiting role in mating.”

aka their gender role

“older men tend to marry older women, including those who are peri- and post-menopausal”

TIL Korea is so degenerate it has slave markets. Ooof.

So much for the myth that young women have the hots for them. Yeah, I’m sure the Jap schoolgirl came onto you, right perv?

Deadbeats are the end of the West:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816303671

Research in evolutionary psychology, and life history theory in particular, has yielded important insights into the developmental processes that underpin variation in growth, psychological functioning, and behavioral outcomes across individuals. Yet, there are methodological concerns that limit the ability to draw causal inferences about human development and psychological functioning within a life history framework. The current study used a simulation-based modeling approach to estimate the degree of genetic confounding in tests of a well-researched life history hypothesis: that father absence (X) is associated with earlier age at menarche (Y). The results demonstrate that the genetic correlation between X and Y can confound the phenotypic association between the two variables, even if the genetic correlation is small—suggesting that failure to control for the genetic correlation between X and Y could produce a spurious phenotypic correlation. We discuss the implications of these results for research on human life history, and highlight the utility of incorporating genetically sensitive tests into future life history research.

I don’t think debtor’s prisons will come back – but if you breed it, you should feed it. I think the abandoned women that existed since Biblical times will just hire bounty hunters to shoot the first family deserter for a share of his life insurance policy.

Patriarchs everywhere would rejoice at culling the cads. The women get a widow’s pension.

Everyone wins. Hey, you said “until death do us part”. Men used to die by their oaths.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381400052X

I have noticed that immigrant men have a higher pitch than their non-immigrant relatives.

Maybe the act of immigration impairs masculinity?

Low male voice pitch may communicate potential benefits for offspring in the form of heritable health and/or dominance, whereas access to resources may be indicated by correlates of socioeconomic status, such as sociolinguistic features. Here, we examine if voice pitch and social dialect influence women’s perceptions of men’s socioeconomic status and attractiveness. In Study 1, women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices.

A lot of PUAs get shot down for 1. being brown and feeling entitled to a white woman, the lowest miscegenation group also further sickened by repeated forced “refugee” interactions and 2. having a high pitch voice and effete face compared to their national relatives. Compare within the white race, the “Latin lover” in Italy versus Italian immigrants raised and living in London, who sound like cartoon chipmunks by comparison.

Yes, we notice.

No, you can’t change it. We notice.

Same applies to white men who moved South so it appears to be immigration. Either being an immigrant or the act itself makes a man less manly. Most obviously, torso body fat deposition like a woman of their group and the sisters become like the men at home, more athletic.

In Study 2, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness.

It isn’t the money, it’s the genes.

Good genes, good brains, good money. Fixating on the money is what ugly guys do – Muslim prince to Jewish media mogul.

We also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men’s voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status.

Capacity to protect. Not a desk jockey. The middle-class is effeminate. They want army. No cowards.

Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status.

Women know quality, really? Almost like our lives depend on it.

Finally, women’s own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch.

Plenty of men chose to marry down to get a looker out of their genetic league, hypergamy.

Erotic capital is worth it, as you can tell by the fertility study above, even post-menopausal they’re better-looking.

Hence, women’s preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women’s preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch.

Women…. making…. mate choices?

mutation load is important?

 

Brain size of males by race

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/brain-size-race-and-iq/

includes this

The third piece of evidence is that the racial gaps have existed for a long time. In fact, based on the data from the tables above, the White/Black brain size gap doesn’t seem to have gotten any smaller during the 20th century.

Long before your 60s immigration acts.

The first thing to note is that brain size in the general population has a heritability of 87%. Thus, almost all the differences between individuals in brain size are caused by genes.

Secondly, we should note that racial brain size differences are present at, and even before, birth.

Keep blaming women though, that’ll help.

We need more direct studies like this. Gestation length and other variables must be accounted.

Menarche and other variables like WHR vary by race in the women too. More studies! MORE!

The manosphere is based on a myth of equalism, it was destined to fail.

Fourthly, racial brain size differences have been found all around the world. For instance, the Beals and Smith data set previously referred to features skulls from over 100 populations world wide. Many of the autopsy studies previously cited were done in East Asia, as were two of the MRI studies. This makes any gene independent cultural explanation less likely.

Fifthly, several studies have shown that mulattoes have an average brain size in between that of Blacks and Whites (Pearl, 1934Bean, 1906). This finding has been established on multiple occasions and is what a hereditarian hypothesis would predict since mulattoes are half White and half Black genetically speaking.

Do studies for other mixes.

Sixth, many traits which tend to co-evolve with larger brains also differ racially in a way that mirrors the body size adjusted brain size patternRushton and Rushton (2003) looked at 37 anatomical features which 3 textbooks on human evolution identified as tending to co-evolve in the hominid line with larger brains. For instance, larger pelvic size tends to co-evolve with brain size so that mothers can give birth to larger brained infants.  Rushton then utilized 5 forensic anthropology textbooks to look at racial differences in these traits. These traits followed the East Asian>White>Black pattern in 25 out of 31 cases. The probability of this happening at random is .000000001.

WHR is important.

Follow the tag, there are racial differences in studies.

And East-Asian isn’t a race, at best it’s a sub-group, do more studies. Properly.
Asians fail more often on IVF, also posted about that.

Similarly, Rushton (2004) showed that, across 234 mammalian species, brain size correlates with longevity, gestation time, birth weight, litter size, age of first mating, body weight, and body length. Various studies have shown that each of these variables also differ between the races in a way that, based on what we find across the animal kingdom, would predict the body size corrected brain size differences we observe (Rushton, 1995Templer 2006Rushton and Templer, 2009;).

Longevity – must look at averages e.g. not Danes for all whites nor Japs for all Asians.
Gestation – we know this varies.
Weight – control confounds.
Litter size – look at natural rate of twinning.
Virginity loss is r-select, do not want.
Body weight – vague.
Length – we already know racial height. Still, add to the rest, I guess.

Thus, we have six lines of evidence all of which would be predicted by a hereditarian view on racial differences in brain size. While each line of evidence on its own may not be compelling, the combination of all six seems to strongly imply that racial brain size gaps are partly heritable.

It is worth noting that the racial brain size gaps are probably not entirely attributable to genes. Some authors, including Richard Nisbett, have plausibly argued that nutrition also plays a role. However, there explanations are not mutually exclusive, no environmental variables has been shown to account for the majority of the gap, and,  as we have seen, there are many separate lines of evidence indicating that genes also play a role

A confound, in weight.

I suggest seafood consumption.

There is good evidence that the races evolved different brain sizes in response to climate. Specifically, various studies have found that a population’s brain size correlates with climate related variables. For instance, Pearce and Dunbar (2011) ‘s data set produces a correlation of .74 between a population’s brain size and its latitude. Similarly, Ash and Gallup (2007) found a correlation of .48 between the size of 109 fossilized human skulls and the latitude at which they were found. Further still, Bailey and Geary (2009) analyzed 175 skulls ranging in age from 10,000 years old to 1.9 million years old and found a correlation of -.41 between brain size and winter temperature and -.61 between size and latitude (larger brains were found in areas more distant from the equator).

How dare you use science.

The weebs might reee!

Lynn (2015) used Smith and Beals data set of 20,000 skulls from 122 populations to estimate that roughly 30% of the African-European IQ gap can be statistically accounted for by brain size differences. By contrast, brain size differences would actually predict an Asian-European IQ gap 35% larger than the one that actually exists. Thus, brain size is probably one of many factors, both biological and environmental, which account for racial intelligence differences.

Can ya rig the test?

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/intelligence-and-corruption/

Easy, who’s the most innovative?

Especially before colonialism spreading info. Right?

You can rig IQ tests and college transcripts, not more advanced farming equipment when the other group invented it centuries prior.

Male beauty predicts sperm quality

Note how the cucks and sluts of the manosphere ignore/d this finding because it hurts their feelings.

Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar

Duuuuuh?


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513803000138

It’s called fitness, smarter people are also naturally more attractive.
Who we’re told is (((smart))) in the modern world is just educated, a different variable, natural IQ correlates to beauty. It’s an established, permanent correlation. Appealing to exception doesn’t work.

Facial attractiveness has been related to health in both men and women. Certain psychological, physiological, and secondary sex characteristics have been used as accurate markers of hormonal and developmental health. The main objective of this study was to investigate the capacity of women to select males of high reproductive quality based on their facial attractiveness. A total of 66 males were included in the study. Each of them provides a semen sample, and frontal and lateral photographs were taken. Semen analysis was made according to standard WHO (1999) guidelines for morphology, motility, and concentration. Moreover, a Sperm Index (SI) was calculated as the principal…

View original post 123 more words

White rape gangs

Before any spoiled little shit tries to change the subject, when men are raped they can’t get pregnant or endure fatal physical damage (especially virgin females) so yes, it is completely different and shame on you for equating the biology for virtue signalling points.

It’s a false equivalence. The area the sexes hugely differ is the reproductive systems.

At the very least, women have more nerves to damage.

Women and children are permanently vulnerable so no, it isn’t all about men. Stop waving around your man card for five fucking minutes. This is about civilization. There should be an expectation of safety or why bother?

The statistics are very clear and rape shouldn’t exist for anyone, ideally. However, most rapists, regardless of target, are male and this is indisputable. That is your red suppository.

Ah, but the snowflakes who try to refocus any attention on them like a sweet 16 TV star don’t want to admit that women are vulnerable, because then men have to be responsible for their own feels. The Bible is very clear that your own lust is yours to control. Pluck out thine eyes than sin with them. Unless you can seriously claim you’re holier than God, fuck off with your victim blaming and blame the biggest claimed victim, yourself.

What do you really expect? The public space to be a sexual trigger-free safe space like some low IQ shithole? Why not live there? Ah, but it’s about happiness isn’t it? Other people’s natural erotic capital makes you feel insecure. If you can’t be attractive, you’ll ask every attractive person to cover up because Harrison Bergeron was the fucking documentary prequel to Idiocracy. It’s impossible and ridiculous to presume a standard for the West we never needed. Men are turned on by fantasy, how do we ban that? Is staring outlawed? The sadism of restricting normal healthy First World expressions is insane. Where is the line? Kids can’t be topless on beaches too?

Pedophiles exist. Gay men too so men gotta wear niqabs too. For a pervert atheist’s definition of “modesty”, no shoes, no cars, no toasters… people want to fuck all of those. It isn’t about the sexual object, its own feelings don’t matter. It’s all about the long suffering deviant who “can’t help it”, infantilization like that reduces their legal responsibility, somehow (fact: only if you’re retarded). And instead of inventing some etiquette when we’re in dire need of exactly that we’re going to blame the world for stimulating them with photons.

Sure, if I robbed a bank I “can’t help it” because I like money, right? Like that?
I am attracted to money, no word of a lie so I can roll around naked on it like a sexy Godfather. Money swimming because moon bathing is for hippies and witches.

Children get away with things because compared to an adult their growth is retarded. They literally don’t have as much impulse control as an adult but studies show everyone can learn! Even the thick! I bet you’re glad you have no excuse now, huh?

No?

You all argue in bad faith. It isn’t about goodness, it’s about you feeling good about yourself.

The SJWs have fat acceptance, the MGTOW have ugly appreciation. Anyone not naturally ugly must be covered in shame, because beauty isn’t divine or ordained to be enjoyed by god as part of nature! These people don’t believe in beauty (their ego cannot “tolerate” it) but they’ll gnaw your ear off with a false teleology of evolution (I read the book, it isn’t in there) where ugly psychopathic weaklings are the Ubermensch because they’re “man” enough to rape.

Bear in mind, Western culture = Western aesthetic expression.
If you aren’t free to express, culture is dead. Muslims are getting skirts banned in schools. That’s your team. That is your stated side of history. If you look in the real legal history of the West, sumptuary laws never ever worked. Lower hemlines solve nothing. And that was class appropriation. Men loved crossdressing for millennia before women! If women had to dress like men, only men would complain! We like being warm in winter! Men lose out on the opportunity to assess a future spouse’s genetic fitness based on physique. Hope you like a lemon. If every woman must cover up, every woman is tacitly informed to let themselves go, since they can’t display their value for a potential mate or social value among other women. Hence, the fat acceptance win.

Look how many women in niqabs are obese compared to hijabs. Modest, huh?

The corset was a response to Victorian obesity. Shameful fat is modern. The only permanently skinny people in the olden days were the starving poor, everyone else fluctuated because seasons exist and central heating didn’t.

Henry VIII wore the equivalent of a bandage dress on his obesity and not one of you fat-shamers say a thing about it!

People get murdered for no reason. Rape is the same, you don’t have to “do” anything, that’s a Just World fallacy. Predators randomly attack. Unless you want to bring back either castration or hanging to limit that ability, you don’t get to bitch that the victims were “asking for it” but only if female. That is sadistic and vengeful, respectively.

Society is about a realistic appraisal of how shitty humans are and shaming it. If shaming rapists makes you feel personally attacked then fine. Get a therapist.

Everybody hates these guys because they do nothing of their own volition; it’s spiteful, reactive, insecure whining when they feel someone, somewhere, might make them question their beliefs or feel bad in empathy for three seconds. That must hurt. They never start charities, host their own platforms and debates, no lobbying, God forbid! Nothing with effort. They use the rape of others as a verbal battering ram to protect their grandiose ego and it’s sickening to anyone with a conscience.

Off-topic: Making a joke about rape isn’t the same as threatening rape and the joke is still in poor taste if you phrase it poorly. Getting offended someone didn’t laugh at your joke is pathetic, finding rape horrific is not.

You want a virtue signal? I was here for years before you and caught shit from feminists for having a male rape tag and also talking about child grooming, kidnapping, rape gangs. I refused to pretend it was just little girls too and have firsthand experience with victims to know, how many of you can say that? People somewhat believed little boys were a possibility but struggle to believe to this day that adults can be taken in too. “Trafficking” is the media term, its real name is Modern Slavery. You believe any anecdote a man writes and disbelieve any female, that’s called misogyny. Even the Muslims aren’t that bad. SJWs do the opposite, believing any woman and mocking any man in pain, they are also evil cunts. It’s hypocritical evil and it’s still evil and you can’t make me say it’s not. Now the MRA assholes stream in to tell me I’m an SJW because I believe virginity is real (they don’t) and only women can get pregnant (they don’t).

I’m neither! Neither of you assholes can label me in the other camp. It’s being normal.

Some of us can see over our identity to the issues!

I’ve been targeted by everyone! They all think I’m the other guy!

It is possible to care about ALL rape victims at the same time, while acknowledging that for medical reasons, there are differences! This is the one crime where you cannot ignore anatomy! Sorry bro??!

Update: I’ll put this here, whatever.

And the #MeToo thing helped open up a national conversation here to the abuse of largely boys in boarding schools, until you morons shut it down by taking the piss (even out of male victims, brave) and now it’s all been covered up again. It might be impossible now to retread that ground, the old ones are dying off. Congratulations, you’ve personally helped defend pedophile rings. They were being exposed and you stopped it for feels. Thanks for spoiling my plan, fuckheads. It’s called the Overton Window.

Now everyone’s gone back to making insulting films about their privilege.
I’d rather not be raped far from home as a child, thanks. Boarding School Syndrome might go aways to explaining all the cucks. The parents to this day don’t want their child blamed for or suspected of seducing the adult, male teacher.
There is your toxic masculinity.

Did I mention there is no legal obligation to report child rape? Even the schools don’t need to tell the State (that will do nothing).
And the age of consent helps this along, to continue to exist? The consent that was Victorian, provisional (intended to rise with biological information we now have to make majority 18, majority was de facto 16 then for the military) and intended to prevent child rape and prostitution?

Dragging pedophiles and rapists into broad daylight shouldn’t frighten you.

Our time period in history will likely be called Pedophile’s Paradise.

They tried to take MeToo and re-shape it because it was working.
It proved they don’t own the internet. It’s the only place to change hearts. Most people don’t have minds.

Or would it make more sense if I titled this with brackets?

Idiots. There was no Plan B and they knew it. For a split second, their media hold was dead. And some of the swarthier among you had to pretend rape doesn’t happen to women…. really? Castrate yourself, you don’t deserve that dick.

The people doing the rape might be white but what about the people protecting them from justice?

Idiots can’t see logically how their actions bring about chaos. They misunderstand the situation and fuck it up for the smart ones who planned it.

Why did Hollywood suddenly go quiet on the Marxist support during that whole thing, no politics? Didn’t you notice? Hope and tacit support. They wanted to see who won before coming out. You shot us. I’m still pissed. The children suffer the most. Thanks, defend the guy with a rape button under his desk! Penis mafia! Traitor.

Spot the difference.

Stick a great big swinging dick on it. That would be honest about your priorities: Muh Dick.

They let you win – for them. You were anti-white, so you won. Who’s the SJW here?

If your workplace forces you to concede orgies are morally okay and you probably secretly wanted to be raped by your boss, anything you say about those people will be used to paint you as crazy or the real rapist here. Unless society’s standards change (denial stops) and all these people are brought to light. A spotlight.

Awkwardness is the entire point.

You might notice Denial Stops as the mantra of the red pill. Idiots.

The only way to defeat a victim culture is with real victims.

Even the white predators target whites. Those are also not okay.

You wouldn’t get over yourself so you played yourself.

Peterson, poor man’s Jung

http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/11/tragic-folly-of-jordan-peterson/

False prophet, will ruin a good life.
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/06/mailvox-by-their-fruits.html
“I have no idea who it was who first introduced me to Jordan Peterson”
You know who.
“And, too, the marital problems and selfish, sinful decisions I had made incentivized me to look for an escape from God’s judgment. Sin always looks to justify itself, and sinners are no different. I wanted to justify my sin, justify myself, and avoid the consequences. All of it together brewed into a perfect storm, which subsequently broke. I told my wife I didn’t know if God existed, that I doubted, and that I hated Him for imposing restrictions on my life. It was hardly coherent. She was understandably shocked and appalled.”
Making men fail.
She’s right to abandon a man who refuses to do his duty as the spiritual head of the household. That isn’t a man let alone husband, or the man she swore to serve. He failed to serve her.
See, they want a head shot. Instant kill of the family unit.
“I never doubted God’s existence prior to Jordan Peterson. Peterson’s philosophy shook my belief and deepened my despair and destructive spiral.”
Know them by their fruit. A good tree produces good fruit. A bad tree produces bad fruit. A bad tree must be cut down and burned.
He isn’t even right-wing. Don’t listen to any profane sentiments on the sacred. They’re making it up. It’s a game to them.
Narcissists enjoy destroying the happiness of others.
Don’t marry, don’t breed, don’t be happy. – not your friends
Your instincts to survive and thrive are natural and holy.
He infantilizes you like the SJWs do everyone.
Whatever, you’ll figure it out eventually.

A classic manipulation technique is to distract you with mundane life e.g. chores, to keep a good brain distracted from purpose and higher calling.

What does Peterson’s ideal culture look like? ….Nobody can answer this.

They all have different answers. He’s an inkblot for gullible idiots. The “fuck you, Dad!” philosopher.

Losers want you to sit around being miserable and useful idiots for their ends.

The manosphere is one big excuse to let white men cuck for non-whites.

The gator will bite you.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/06/17/this-wont-end-well-idiots/

Remember, they aren’t “your women”, you sexist pig, even if it’s your wife/mother/daughter.

Those African men are real manly alpha, they have a right to your homeland. As they chase those little girls down, don’t worry, they wanted it! All white women are whores and want to be raped, right?

They can’t be raped if their ideology (cult) thinks all women are whores. Result: no obligation to defend anything. How convenient, and principled!

It’s a great way for white men to be cowards but portray it as strength (fucking gammas).

Because obviously, if there’s a Taharrush game near you, that’s just their masculine culture and you should side with the men 110% of the time, even as they’re raping those “little sluts” that said No like feminists.

What happens when the white men say no? They act like non-whites don’t ever rape white men or boys.

First they came for the white children.

I did not speak out because I am not a child.

Next they came for the white women.

I did not speak out because I am a man.

Finally, they came for the white man.

Everyone said he deserved it.

Link: Manosphere sour grapes

As other people mature and move on with their lives, there will always be people thinking they’re perma-18.

They are the creepers.

Manosphere sour grapes

I wondered why so many of those otherwise rational types* were single.

*Not the majority online.

Then I saw a video titled “Never date a girl older than 25”.

Like they have a choice?

Like those “girls” want them?

They think the world is a Lynx advert.

It’s about control, at least be honest. They’re impressed you have a car and went backpacking. You wanna be the cool one. They’ll put up with games because they’re still practically a child (brain).

What about when they hit 25? Ugh, r-types.

YOU CANNOT SIGNAL A STATUS YOU DO NOT HAVE.

IT DOES NOT WORK.

PSA.

Like all of women’s evolved circuits can be over-ridden by a well-written Tindr profile.

If you have to lie about your life, stop lying and fix it before surrounding yourself with more lies.

The big thing that attracts women is stability? Too beta? OK, be happy to die alone.

Or, don’t be shocked when you only attract the same quality level you are.

If you want to be too fussy to date a chubby, when those are the only women in your US area and level, then be fine with being alone. No gripes, it’s your choice. That is the red pill reality.

If you don’t need women, this shouldn’t matter.

They complain about reality e.g. she cares about my looks as much as I care about hers! while also claiming they want more, harsher realities.

Son, you can’t survive NOW.

The easiest society in HUMAN HISTORY. They fail at life.

It’s like how the chubby kid with a cheap katana begging for a zombie apocalypse wouldn’t last 15 minutes of running. Women can see this. Delusion is creepy. It’s also creepy in dumpy ghetto trash who thinks she can get a famous rapper. Men ignore them too. Class is the thing Americans never discuss.

The world won’t re-arrange itself to help you, this isn’t the Secret.

If they managed to luck into gaining a classy date, they’d find fault (avoidant attachment) or screw it up (cheating, abandonment). They’re just fuck-ups.

They do it in career too.

Most who go there and stay for years and years are jerks and become self-sabotaging jerks. Karma. The same life plan won’t work years later. You need to evolve.

Consider their percentage of a population, <0.1%. There’s just something wrong with a lot of them, statistically. They’re the dregs who would’ve died in a war. Since we have no war, it’s like the Indian men acting up.

They won’t go to a therapist so they don’t actually care about their own happiness.

Why should we?

Other men manage it. Other men can be happy. Stop taking marriage advice from men who hate women and hate marriage, for starters? #commonsense

Another thing, a man who never wants to marry, is useless to a woman who does. And wants to have kids and do the whole thing. Useless. Another big reason they’re rejected. Maybe a phobia, maybe something else.