Silky French bastard.
I love it.
This man is a scientist, btw.
I don’t know if the full book is available.
Silky French bastard.
I love it.
This man is a scientist, btw.
I don’t know if the full book is available.
It’s like asking an SJW about being a stay-at-home mother, they avoid it and they’re hostile so if you wanna marry with kids do not ask a group of perma-bachelor genetic suicides.
They might be good on other topics, like finance and hobbies, but they project all their failures away on this little one so it’s completely 180 ass-backwards wrong. You get male spinsters in their 30s demanding a 17yo Russian virgin they couldn’t even pull at the male physical peak, 18.
It’s the core topic they go on because they’re secretly obsessed (like the MGTOWs on female websites) about but it reminds me of the men who visit hookers and insist they’re good with women. Maybe because in many cases, that is them. They’re too stupid to know the women they solicit are whores. Do you want advice from that guy?
Consider the common complaints – women ruin everything (cue rattle throw), we have data proving it and state spending favours women.
Well, they ignore all the data they don’t like, do not seek out data which might prove their false faith false and fail to account for the male half of the fucking equation e.g. men don’t marry so women get pregnant out of wedlock, the rise of deadbeats and imagine if we stopped spending on women. Aside from being literally sexist because women pay taxes, no more free birth control. Would this make them happy, or sad?
I don’t think it takes a genius to figure that one out.
No free STD shots for men and no abortions for the consequence dodgers.
Happy or sad?
I think they’d riot, frothing at the mouth, right alongside the ghetto.
And they’re just as bad as the feminists, for producing children and then wishing to murder them rather than spend time and money caring for someone, it’s a damaged human you’re dealing with.
So they don’t really hate single mothers, it’s the narcissism of small differences, many produced them by failing their spouse (if you lead the house, alpha man) and divorcing. They’re just the male equivalent of the angry feminazi who wants more money for themselves and narcissist who wants all other groups to suffer, a bitter shell of a person with a thin sense of esteem and cheap ideas. As you might notice, that selfishness is the root of their problems.
You can’t ask an inferior person about how to be better than average.
Emphasis on You Go Girl?
Emphasis on You Go Galt.
The men need a woman like a fish needs a bicycle!
The free market cost of fucking around is a shotgun wedding, you stupid motherfuckers. Please explain how you plan to dodge in that case.
Would this make them happy, or sad?
If the Government stopped bailing out their dick.
I agree, we should stop bailing everyone out. Starting with men, because their gender role is provider.
I have a game where friends screencap me interesting Youtube comments.
Right click to open image and delete anything after a ? to see full size.
Inspired by a man’s post, sent to me by a man.
~~~slowest of claps~~~
Someone looked for negative evidence! A man of humility/quality!
Manning up refers to a series of useful actions, not text game scripts.
Ruined narcissists are only contented if they ruin those who come after them. They burned out, as player burnout widely attests, it’s a dead-end and so they now crawl like worms after women young enough to be their daughter or grand-daughter? They encourage vulnerable young men to do the same, under the guise of loving them and saving them from their instincts. Like the 70s feminists do with women.
The sexual revolution was for men because sex is all the low quality men wanted. They’re now pajama boys, porn addicts and general wastes of space creating nothing of civilizational value.
If you only associate with the trashy women, 1. you are trash people, you don’t get to use the word degenerate as a pejorative and 2. you have no right to comment on non-trash, which is the majority if you look at say, the stats on US college sluts (only 20-30%). For the same reason you don’t ask a fat person for exercise advice.
The data they hide is the data that shows they lie.
They deserve it. Let them go. The re-sale value on a single parent, especially a shitty deadbeat, makes them more sexually worthless than before. Maybe they can find a nice black single mom, losers need love too!
Once you go black….
cos if you went Asian, clearly it isn’t a race thing….
I mean, at least the black women and Latina look like women, curvy, like adults should. Both can cook real food without bitch-tit producing rice carbs and MSG poisoning you.
You marry a foreigner without knowing what you’re really signing up for and they turn out to be a hooker with totally polar priorities e.g. Asian religions value family, wives don’t have a Christian duty to have sex once the babies are out of them. That tired look in the married businessmen who resort to hookers? Yeah.
The pussy becomes a salt mine.
Ask around among your fellow men, I’m glad the stories are getting out there because just look at divorce rates at least, the grass is not greener! It’s fake grass!
You’d think the tranny-level makeup would tip them off.
When a guy online has an evil bitch ex-wife story, they never mention the race, do they? Ask for a picture. Ask if she was also white. You should always ask because they’ll hide it from you than admit they fucked up. Where was she from?
In the West, you’re a laughing stock. The envy angle is correct, they’re LARPing white like the wiggers do black and with all the attendant mental issues.
They also do the same with black girls. Creepy.
At least a Vegas wife is as spoiled as she’s gonna get.
Look up Asian Princess. It’s like LA women on more crack.
And the signalling, oh my! If you don’t take her to fifteen expensive restaurants a month, you’re over. Who’s showing who off, in that scenario?
They look so emasculated in the family and they don’t even know it. Like a little dog that pays for everything.
Don’t get me started on the beauty studies. You can only accurately discern the beauty or ugliness of someone in your own race. It’s neuroscience, your brain can’t process outsiders as well. So they think they got a 8 because she’s skinny-fat and has no waist (ruler shape) and acts surprised when she blows up on takeaway quality food after the baby arrives? If she was above-average, she wouldn’t be with you.
You don’t get to look down on white women/black men.
Studies show miscegenation couples are lower quality, they can’t fish in their own pond.
Look it up, look around, and think of the kids – health problems at the least.
Speaking of rice, the shit’s poison.
Famine food isn’t real food.
Millennials are so SJW because they think they stand to gain £££££££.
When the promises of the Left prove false, such as home ownership, stable work and retirement….
A sea change wouldn’t describe it, tsunami might.
We’re completely self-indulgent but it’s a secondary effect of generational depression.
Gen X were angry, we’re depressed, Z are apathetic.
“I’m a millennial, metaphorically I feel the moral corruption of my generation, whispering to me that I should just fuck bitchez and leave well enough alone, that I’ll never succed as a tradionalist, that I’ve fucked enough bitchez and can’t possibly marry, it’s hypocritical of me to support traditional marriage or heteronormativity. If I believed in demons, I would say the sexual immorality we were all but taught in school by the boomers is one.
I know that other millennials would be with us if they didn’t have easy access to genz pussy on tinder, and others would be with us if they didn’t see ideas as separate from their personal lives / see the path of redemption as hypocrisy.”
The degeneracy isn’t just killing people individually, it’s killing their futures collectively.
Enabled by people who detest them as Straight, White Males.
Now, what do you offer a Straight White Male to destroy himself, since you can’t do it yourself?
The Sexual Revolution. It ruined men.
Until that problem is addressed and acknowledged and well-known, the exploitation of man’s greatest weakness, then all the crying about universal suffrage is a red herring. There isn’t a single “right-wing” man I’ve seen online that isn’t as “Sex Positive” as the most virulent SJW. That’s why we’ve lost. Bacchus isn’t Jesus, it’s Satanic.
Postmodernism, any modernism, can only be defeated by a return to tradition, but the men are too weak.
They’re all too weak now.
From thinking with their dicks, worse than any case of PMS.
PMS never killed a race.
It isn’t purely men that do this but in a marriage, I’ve never heard of a woman doing it.
Those ‘redpill husbands’ claiming this is prosocial domination are covering for their antisocial, divorce-causing behaviour.
In a 1998 study of 130 newlywed couples designed to explore predictors of divorce or marital stability, marriage researcher and author Dr. John Gottman and colleagues, labeled this observed behavior of husbands — as “bat-em-back” — due to the force with which husbands automatically acted to cut off any attempts of wives to influence. To the researchers, this intentional behavior was likened to that of a baseball player at the plate, ever ready to “bat” a home run.
This and subsequent studies found that a husband’s “refusal to accept influence from his wife” — in effect, gaslighting — is highly predictive of divorce. On the bright side, findings also showed that a husband’s “acceptance of influence from his wife” is even more predictive of a stable and happy marriage.
Essentially he’s depriving her of her role, refusing to allow her to support him.
Well, if you didn’t want support, why aren’t you single?
If you hate the feminine, why legally and spiritually bind yourself to it?
Are the abusers honest about this fact? No.
Never. They’d lose control. You cannot cooperate with someone who wants to destroy you.
They don’t care about the marriage bond and they certainly don’t care about the other spouse.
In Biblical terms, they are letting the team down on the cherish part of the vow.
Naturally, the problem here is not male partners, rather the social conditioning that trains men to anxiously feel they have to prove masculinity on the basis of how different they are from women — and in general that means avoiding the “soft” stuff their female partners want, such as romance, nonsexual touch, doing things she wants or likes (without feeling emasculated), etc.
Anyone who does that whipped sound, you can tell they’re bad with women.
Love is a verb. Do or do not do.
Culturally speaking, we don’t trust that a baby boy will grow to become a man in the same way that an acorn becomes an oak tree. We expect men to be on guard throughout their lives to prove they are the “real” thing, and not “sissies” or “gay” and the like. And men’s fears are real; everyone is “watching,” male and female, ready to shame them to get back on track. (This shaming has intensified in last two decades.)
As Ali notes, gaslighting is a result of social conditioning rooted in a set of beliefs regarding gender roles and masculinity, such as that:
Women’s opinions don’t hold as much weight.
Women’s wants should not be treated as legitimate.
Men should never express regret when their actions have caused pain.
Who doesn’t want to live with a psycho?
Geez, no wonder they divorce the bastard.
If they really believed any of those false beliefs, they would never, ever marry.
They’d rather die on the end of a shotgun.
I don’t think the men who do this realize – if we brought back fault-divorce, men would lose because dissolution is normally their fault. It’s a failure of EQ on their part. That’s also why they refuse therapy, they don’t want to change, like a toddler. They’d rather hurt/weaken or lose the spouse.
“Hamstering” explained as bullshit;
Because women are conditioned to collaborate and empathize, this tactic can send a woman’s brain into an exhaustive wheel-spinning mode of explaining, complaining, crying, begging, pleading, etc. (and women’s socialization leaves them more susceptible …), and deceive a man’s brain into making several false, misleading (and unfortunate) conclusions.
Victim blaming, hilarious. Note that they’re fine around normal people though. It’s mere proximity to the loser who feels the need to throw around diagnoses like a Munchausen by Proxy (Woe is me because of them) that’s the real issue.
For one, they interpret the effectiveness of this thought control tactic to silence their partner’s voice as “proof” of men’s superiority, rightful dominance, strength and intelligence compared women’s, etc., and thus get tricked into relying on a tactic that harms their relationship, and gradually pushes their partner away.
They crave attention, spew bullshit, get what they wanted – but it’s the woman’s fault?
Amazing magic trick.
The dumbass doesn’t know he’s conditioning women not to provide him affection.
That’s a level of retard I’ve never seen.
In truth, gaslighting is a major obstacle to forming a healthy, vibrant couple relationship — emotional intimacy. For most female partners, for example, a failure to build emotional intimacy often means a gradual loss of interest in sex.
Literally the manosphere.
Women don’t want me – how is this their fault?
But while discussing their relationships, you can never, ever talk about them.
Guess the common factor.
Guess the problem.
They’re the type of kid at school who just lied lied lied lied lied and expected everyone would just go along with it.
In a little kid, it’s passable. In men over the age of 21, it’s a mental illness.
I’d bet a lot of them are male borderlines, considering their neurosis over wife abandonment. They get hostile if you question it, there is such a thing as a happy marriage, just not one that involves them. They are the problem.
They don’t mention most of the worst divorce stories are actually inter-racial, white husband and Asian wife.
You’re not supposed to ask, it triggers their narcissistic rage when you question their brain. There isn’t much in there.
It actually came from the manosphere, not the Alt Right. They bled over here and want to bring their dindu Muh Dick ways with them. They think this is mature and manly, as opposed to the shameful self-control of a bonobo.
The woman question? Is that the best name they can come up with? That sounds like a pathetic attempt to draw focus.
Oh, what would that look like?
Like, most rapists are women?
Most murderers are women?
Most deadbeat parents are mothers?
Er… yeah, it isn’t a *woman* problem, is it?
It comes down to – women won’t be my free whore, the problem is women, the whores.
They want to control the return to traditionalism because they’re too scared of women to be nice to them and perhaps maybe marry and pass on their shit(skin) genes.
Look up the Iceland strike. They’d die without female cooperation. They deserve to, by Parental Investment Theory. Humans need both parents or they’re messed up. A lot of these guys love/hate their mother, especially if their father cheated on her. To this day, they blame her for his fuck-ups, literally.
Sharia only works on the low IQ, it’s designed to keep them from killing each other. The high IQ have meritocracy and cooperation and that’s why we’re civilized. The Ice Age improved our genome past that point, see A Troublesome Inheritance.
The history they claim has never existed, they believe in the mommy-wife apron Fantasyland that only existed in 50s vacuum cleaner adverts. And if women are homemakers, men must be soldiers. You don’t get to sit on your ass in the unions or be a paid-up party man.
They are totally ignorant of ancient and European history but spout off about white people. The keyboard alphas there are 9/10 non-white, it’s the dirty secret of PUA – brown man seeks white harem.
Let’s take a few of the rationalisations;
“Women’s sexual desires, almost universally, are straightforward and one-dimensional; they desire the physically strong and dominant man.”
Biology says that’s men with simple lust, quit projecting. You can’t even get a woman to orgasm, don’t pretend you know how we work. In long-term mate selection studies, women choose the ‘Dad’ model and reject the ‘Cad’, you are literally 180-degrees wrong.
“Therefore, race is not a romantic factor for women. They simply want the strongest.”
White women miscegenate the least in all dating website studies. On theapricity forum, for example, many of the ‘white people preservation’ men, are dating Asians.
“And white men are pussies, which is why white women increasingly prefer non-white men.”
Would a white man write that? Who planted that idea? Disciple of Roosh?
Who told you who they prefer?
Where’s your data? Your opinion is not valid, at all.
Why all the assaults and harassment and rape gangs if the white women actually wanted them?
“Anglin attempts to pound his readers into submission by aggressively insisting his claims are settled science—this is a common tactic people use to try to cover for the fact that they’re full of crap. You’ll notice, for instance, that nowhere in the article does he link to a single scientific study. (Although he does provide links for his readers to purchase steroids.)”
Oh, steroid brain. It reduces your humanity.
If it’s settled, you must have a list of studies with cracking methodology.
…..They never do.
But they’re definitely projecting because as this genius links
They have Yellow Fever and want to pretend the white women didn’t want them first.
Instead of attacking White Fever, they attack women.
Almost as if the men writing it….have it?
divide and conquer, cleave the white man from women, and the women are defenseless…
Their greatest enemy is chivalry, which is actually human decency.
Chivalry also applied to other gentlemen, like, they don’t even bother knowing what words mean, the illiterate brown bastards. It existed in the upper classes because they lugged around the big weapons…like cops carrying guns now. They follow a code, right? What do you think that is?
“The only consistent messages from the data is that the majority of women want a man who (1) is taller than them and (2) is not a fat slob.”
where they fail us
they think they can raise an incest baby grown in a fake womb
but they lack the time out of their busy schedule of bile to lose the chub
Women are sexist if they don’t want a short, balding, lazy fatass.
– they’re literally fat acceptance feminists with the sexes inverted
They don’t know how repulsive they are. It’s the entitlement. They think Patriarchy would entitle them to a wife. Like, what, fathers care so little they hand out coupons?
And I bet Mr 3.5 thinks he would get a cute, 17yo white 8.
You prove financial stability, the woman provides her fertility, idiot.
Women do provide – life. You can’t print life at the bank.
In Biblical times, men had rites of passage. You didn’t pass? You didn’t pass on your genes. Stop crying, baby.
They don’t actually study how patriarchies worked, especially with white people.
You’d get strung up for defiling someone’s daughter – for some reason they aren’t too keen on listening to rape victims…. acting like the rapist is the Real Victim Here.
They use fake screen names and no photo because you’d see the racial composition here, and the lower average IQ of those groups.
“Are you beginning to see just how far the ideology of the neo-patriarchic Alt Right is disconnected from reality?”
the word is ‘psychotic’, Gerry
“Just try to think about the real world for ten seconds. Which of these statements do you honestly think is closer to the truth: (A) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the most attractive 5% of men. (B.) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the toughest 5% of men. Of course, there is some overlap between these two categories of men, but clearly (A) is the right answer. If you’re an adult and haven’t noticed this by now, you’re either dumb as a rock or have very eccentric tastes in women.”
They are too dumb to believe in Darwin. Roosh actually reviewed a book of philosophy by a modern writer and thought he disproved evolution. You see, Darwin would mean women are right to have standards – the peacock displays, not the peahen.
They don’t believe in male beauty or more literally, the manosphere refuses to believe in their own ugliness.
They can’t rub testosterone cream over their mug and look like Brad Pitt.
Practically, none of this will ever happen.
How are you gonna get these women from their fathers? Is that not pedophilia? How can you marry someone without consent? Won’t they just throw themselves down the stairs if you rape them pregnant?
The lookism guys are much smarter and genuinely self-improving. The PUAs hate those guys, because they get results.
They know deep down it’s about them and their deep ugliness but this makes them bitter. They have to cheat, like an Asian chick getting tit implants to get a white boy interested. For the first time in history, the low SES have a voice online.
“This Manosphere/neo-patriarchy stuff isn’t just embarrassing because it’s so thoroughly wrong, it also comes off as really pathetic. The Alt Right is supposed to be a serious ideological movement, not a self-help seminar. For a movement that spends so much time worrying about trying to appear as the “cool kids” (way too much time), you’d think people around here would be sensitive to how “beta” this looks to most people. You live in a country where women consider white men to be most attractive, so if you’re having a hard time out there, I’m sorry brother, but that’s on you. Don’t taint the ethnonationalist cause by associating it with your sexual frustrations.”
They are not Alt Right.
They are MGTOW who reject K-selected unions and never want to marry.
They are genetic suicides who don’t want children unless they can abandon them to a nanny.
There is nothing traditional in them. They think it will oppress or upset women, that’s their motive, to hurt women in revenge. [cough Elliot Rodger cough]
Since when has a good husband and motherhood upset a K-woman????
These losers call themselves redpill but ignore any data that isn’t cherry-picked to cater to their feelings.
Oh, but women are special snowflakes because …periods?
What’s their excuse, broflakes? They’re like Trigglypuff if you mention the world doesn’t revolve around their micropenis.
They can’t attract women because they hate women. Duh.
“Since ideological truth is subjective, you can base your ideology on anything, but just because you can, doesn’t mean that you should. One thing the neo-patriarchists should do though, is man-up and admit they were wrong.”
They’re Peter Pan fuckboys, they’re trash. They’re so passive aggressive they’ve sabotaged their own lives, let them go and destroy themselves. They have the right.
The strangest thing about these discussions?
They deny HBD (on race) but then try to mouth off on HBD topics…. with no awareness of how HBD findings are compiled or any real, good data.
They’re sub-100 IQs trying to pass themselves off as mathematically literate.
Milo started this with one (literally one) article on an IQ finding.
He didn’t want to be scientific and get a psychometrician in, just punch down (as he sees it). It’s like a 13yo’s view of strength, the bully model.
Their role models are a Jewish homo and Roosh, who supposedly has both Jewish and Muslim blood…. that explains the nose job, frankly…
yeah, these guys wanna bring in Christian patriarchy, we can trust them!
Bonus: the sad autism of notch counters.
The phenomenon pointed up here with our lad is that of the “notch count.” In his case, the notches are for amusingly inconsequential things: hugging his cousin, having an internet “girlfriend” for a week or so, etc. Our lad exults in his “success” with the ladies, when in truth his supposed achievements have been minimal to non-existent. But to chortle at his embarrassingly unearned exultation misses the broader critique implied here. Even if that which counts for legitimate “notches” in our lad’s estimation doesn’t amount to much in our perception, his degradation doesn’t consist in his absence of “legitimate” action; rather, it lies in the fact that he, like many men, base their feeling of masculine self-worth on the number of “notches” they have obtained.
They’re trying to be the popular girl…. by being sluts.
Manwhores have the dignity of jailbait. Look how much of a fake they can be, to get women to laugh!
It’s counterphobic, they hate/fear women so spend all their spare time… literally fucking women over.
The bad women couldn’t control men without sex. Feminists told men that being sluts was something to brag about….. figure it out. I hate to see adult males demean themselves.
They fake a lot, actually. This is level 1 of Operation Half-White Baby.
Asian cosmetics are plain better than ours, if you bother to look. The intent of it all? Snag a husband.
But the white girls are fake for using concealer, right? Red lipstick?
While the manosphere is discussing the pedomorphic neotony of Asians, with a focus on the eyes and claiming this is superior because it’s more feminine than white women…..
…that’s because it literally isn’t real.
Let’s quote the denizens of Roosh V’s forum, shall we?
There is a reason women put on fake eyelashes, it will make their eyes look a bit more distanced from each other and larger. With the help of makeup they can look more “sweet”
They basically don’t have eyelashes. Short stubby things that grow directly outward.
It’s part of the fake femininity thing. Here we call it a cutesy act.
Remember, most fake geek girls were/are Asian.
As I pointed out before, otherwise their childish looks would freak you out, if they behaved their age.
The fake eyelashes are worse than a Kardashian. How are you not getting this?
More fake lids!
Superior femininity, right guys?
Bigeye widespace girls are quality. Warm, generous, sensitive.
Deep socket girls have intellectual depth, honesty, and conscientiousness.
The surgery can be superb though….
You’d never know, would you!
Well, until she gives birth. By then, you’re fucked too!
If natural lids were retained, this would be the result.
It’s called “monolid makeup”, look it up.
Because white women are traps.
Look at the angle of the eyebrows. There is no nurturing quality at all. Combined with her eyes there is a soul-less quality to her stare. I can’t quite tell what it is about the eyebrows but hopefully you guys see it too.
I may be going insane but I’ve picked up on certain facial characteristics that tend to be common with bitchy and non-nurturing females.
The biggest one is the manjaw of course.
Also, small beady eyes that are close together.
While on the subject of Edenic anthropology, Asian women can have manjaws.
That chick is not widespace, but she is definitely bigjaw and wideface. The latter two are testosterone indicators, so I would expect more aggression, abrasiveness, higher sex drive – pretty much how Roissy describes his lawyer chicks. Her eyes are not very large, either, so reduced sensitivity.
Most of them do, actually.
You just aren’t looking.
The hate-on for whites is too strong.
This graphic is from a facial study.
Label of graphic is:
Back-up here for convenience’s sake:
Look at that manjaw. Look at that thing! You can grate cheese on it. It is a sign of high testosterone.
In other words, if you have two equally cute girls, go with the one with the higher pitched voice, the more feminine waist to hip ratio, and the smaller jawline.
WHR? Asian women are definitely out.
More Roosh forum quotes! Always more!
Masculine facial traits include:
Robust brow region; small eyes
Marked mandibular breadth (wide jaw)
High, pronounced nose bridge and/or greater nasal width
Perhaps if I use their own words, it’ll sink in.
Feminine facial traits are neontenous traits, signals of youth (i.e. traits that children/babies have), basically the opposite of above:
Gracile features, flatter faces
Reduced brow region; large eyes
Low, subdued nose bridge, with lesser nasal width
In context, this part is hilarious.
This is why East Asian girls and white girls are so popular among men. East Asian girls have the most gracile facial morphology; white girls “cheat” with large eyes.
It’s like they can’t see over their erection.
Studies? No? No studies?
Like, one group is literally faking its eyelids and not one of them has the slightest idea.
But they’re 100% accurate judges of women, yes Siree!
not one had the intellectual curiosity to look it up
A little more, I have plenty of salt spare to rub in this ax wound
You could build a boat with a jaw that broad, their long hair is meant to conceal it.
And if you compare the races…
Update backup photo:
White women are gracile in bone structure. According to the plastic surgeons.
Maths, I hear you cry?!
Asians are literally broader as a race.
Here’s something to trigger you, if you’re naive to China.
“Either way, the world’s most common face is, and will continue to be, fully Asian, whether Eastern or Southern, well into the distant future.
The concept of “Asian” cosmetic surgery as a limited subspecialty of plastic surgery is already disappearing as this evolving discipline now encompasses the largest patient base on the planet.
Celebrities and models glorified in the West (and East) as today’s “beautiful” are already old news, really just tomorrow’s “fixer-uppers,” even if they don’t yet know it.
Can we get Heartiste’s take on that?
Sounds fake but OK.
Like none of those bitches would look like Amber Heard, given half a chance.
What does this mean for cosmetic surgery? Look for a “new” phase in Asian plastic surgery where the primary goal will be to look better rather than mainly different or “Westernized.” Operations like double eyelid surgery, epicanthoplasty, cheek and jaw reductions, calf nerve ablations, and so on will degrade into obscure footnotes in old textbooks on outdated plastic surgery.
“Ethnic” plastic surgery will come to refer to surgery on the European or Western population seeking “Easternization.” A whole new group of operations will be developed in response to new demands.
When will all of this happen? In a hundred years? In fifty years? With the present rate of change, give it a good ten years.”
Don’t let mathematical fact get in the way of your fetish.
They’ve been trying to replace white women this whole time.
This whole time, anime was war.