Do women just hate all men? (serious)

TLDR: Yes but also no. Yes for their actions and endorsements, not for being male. It’s more resentment than hatred. Like the hippy slutty Boomers. 7,000 words.

This is going to answer some questions I believe merit being taken seriously because it ties into biology and our future.

It is brutally honest and true, whatever any woman tells you. I have no reason to lie, remember.

I think even the MGTOW types would largely agree with this assessment because it’s rooted in Darwin. Men have all the power, women are mostly sitting there. Waiting for them.

Are the men of today equal to the WW2 generation? Yes or no?
In terms of genetic fitness, we all know the answer is no.
No, they are not.
And women definitely resent this.
All the ‘vintage’ trends aren’t just longing for the ability to wear twirly dresses and high heels without falling afoul of a rapist immigrant, they subconsciously want the genetic fitness of men back. (although women are dressing androgynous to avoid attack by immigrants too, but men refuse to admit this, instead pretending they all wanted to look asexual simultaneously by fluke)
Naturally, none of them will dare tell you this. Especially the tradgirls, so-called conservathots. Do they seem happy to you? Does a bitterness creep in, much like the sad MGTOWs? They believe they’ve made a compromise out of the measly postmodern pickings. Their husband would not be their first choice, if they could get a WW2 hero type instead. All women know this and that is why modern housewives are mocked for ‘settling’. Settling for inferior quality men, not to settle down. In surveys, such women want to get married, so it’s a quality thing. Women are the gatekeepers of genetic quality in the land, men are the protectors of the land itself, remember that. Men are in denial about the sexual selection at play amongst women. All women value men for is genetic fitness. Nobody cares about bank balance if you’re so old (paternal age) you make an autistic kid. Genetic fitness uber alles. It is the reason for both to live. It is the reason for sexual reproduction. A combination of genetic fitness. So women are effectively in an arms race to claim the best man as their provider. Sperm donor means nothing or the ghetto would be doing great.

Compare current ‘men’ to those in the 1990s, then the hippies of the 1970s, the halcyon 1950s, then the WW2 tough 1940s etc. It gets worse and worse the longer you look. Do you imagine women don’t notice?
I don’t think it’s that women hate men, per se, I think sexual selection is at play and women hate what men have become. That is the fault of men and something to place fairly at their feet. The obesity rate is much discussed but most obese people are men. They have no pregnancy excuse, no Pill, no menopause. They even tried to meme it in a fat acceptance way as Dad Bod. WTF. They’re lazy slobs who love beer and wings more than their wife. Don’t be shocked when she no longer wants to fuck you, dude. If you look like a 10 month pregnant woman, she’d have to be a secret lesbian. Do you imagine women don’t comment on these developments? Women always handle men with kid gloves because a certain proportion are insane and will snap and kill people if spoken to like fellow adults, on any topic that threatens their Hollywood-built ego (masculinity is fragile, in this era, not others). When in the bathroom, complete strangers of women will just rip into other women’s husbands, including whether he looks weak (like the weeb with a waifu that has a stronger manjaw than him, and trails along behind her like a dog) or whether he got fat (liver disease, fatty liver) and predicting how long the marriage will last while her libido is trying to make it work. Women naturally have a larger body fat percentage to be healthy (T&A) so this stigma only really goes one way, especially since men cannot get pregnant. This and many other factors, women are brutal in judging. Add in cultural alcoholism giving them impotence issues (PC term ED) and how overweight men have dick shrinkage (look it up) and higher oestrogen, and there’s much to discuss behind their back because they’re not man enough to acknowledge it themselves.

It’s like how all the ugly men rally around to call one another 7s because they have a job. That isn’t how numbers work. You’re all like 2-3s to even ask that shit, brutally. We need a hot or not for men on the 10-scale, looks-only, no hiding behind income, since they would be SHOCKED. It isn’t that women are harsh in rating men. Women are realistic. Women evolved to be, sexual selection is the women’s duty. Men are answering from sexual desperation with a slutty attiude and rank women too highly, sorry. Female simps exist (called pick-mes) but they’re far rarer than men.

So we have an embittered manchild demographic who thinks they belong on a GQ cover because they aren’t as fat as their slob friends and can tie their shoes (but don’t you draft them!), with perverse tastes refined by hardcore POV fetish porn and an ego constructed by the finest of Hollywood’s Jewish minds. So far, so repulsive. Women are sure missing out on that partay.

Then consider what separates a boy from a man. It isn’t age. It isn’t whether he ‘fucks’ (nb. violent bravado terms for anything sexual are a tell of a low quality male, who is also very, very, very bad in bed*). Hollywood lies to men and tells them women want “players” (and players share this as urban legend, despite dying alone). Women do not. In studies, women want conscientious** men for ‘long-term mate selection’, who don’t have diseases and retain the ability to pair bond. Yes, what women want in husbands, men wants in wives. Imagine that. Almost like they’re made for each other. Women swoon over Mr Darcy, they ogle James Bond***. Women would not wish to marry James Bond. Look but don’t touch. He looks diseased and …sticky.
Who wants to marry a thot?

*to speak like an edgelord 13yo past the age of like, 15.
**emotional intelligence, which correlates to IQ so is very much real
***Women sexually objectify men casually more than non-pathological men sexually objectify women, they don’t just tell them about it (verbal abuse) or act any differently (groping etc). They are just looking. This is why women love to read romances and watch entire plot lines about who is getting married. They imagine the couples. It’s the visualisation, they don’t actually want it.

Thus far? As women judging Western men? (also note how female weebs describe Asian men, reconcile with above)

So we have hypocritical sluts claiming their ‘body count’ (violent term) doesn’t count (???) while they brag about defiling the potential wives of other men or hardcore porn addict wankers – so far, so repulsive. Where is the defending Western values part? Even Christian men are whores nowadays, don’t @ me. Having a girlfriend is living in sin. Women don’t look at what you say because men are the liars of the sex*, women look at actions e.g. marriage plots in a story, not proposals.

*most liars are psychopaths and most psychopaths are men, it’s science

MOVING ON—

What distinguishes men from mere males is moral authority.
To put it bluntly, modern men have zero of it.
Not little, but zero.

Look at the average partner count for men (higher than women, most sluts are men, just with a smaller group of women), look at the race-mixing data (higher in white men than women, by far) and look at the deadbeating (almost always a man abandoning his kids, not the mother). This is maths. It is incontrovertible.Women have higher sexual disgust, when studied, than men. By a very, very long shot. As in, practically speaking, women would be happy to die alone than waste their time and risk their life investing in the genetic line of a perverse degenerate aka a man they cannot (biologically) respect. Run studies specifically, you’ll see. Would they rather die alone or have kids with a man who had 5, 50, 500 sexual partners? Second study, a man who is a ‘sex tourist’ in countries with child age of consent? How do you imagine women would assess it?

The manosphere is not redpill, they are bluepill. They twist statistics to avoid responsibility on themselves. Single mothers didn’t get themselves pregnant, lads. The manosphere is so bluepill they agree with the white genocide, they agree with the immvasion and the race-mixing. They are civnats at best who believe (like postmodernists they are) that culture is a magical spell over the magic dirt of Da West and NOT the exclusive entitled homelands of white people, and when you add in lazy shit to the village well, it’s still fine to drink from! Because they got their Chinese restaurants, herpes-spreading massage parlours and slightly cheaper nanny for their abandoned baby. Magical thinking morons. That is not a Christian society any more (if it ever was). If stripper or hooker is a possible career path in your culture for your teen daughter, it is not Christian, but Satanic. This reaction to Puritanism in America is like a pendulum swing in the process of going back and cancel culture is the transition period. Cancel culture is anti-degenerate but concealed. Soon, it will be openly. Sure, women are so jealous (/sarc) of the tragedy of the commons playing out: morally, demographically, culturally and in terms of disease. Y’all sound like Boomers who moved to Thailand to be open pedos. Multiculturalism is the enemy, not Pleasure fucking Island. If you wanna go on holiday, go. Don’t IMPORT it. If you wanna live with it, move THERE, do not force your fellows and the future of your homeland to suffer your dirty hippy xenophilia. Women see men become asses and who wants to marry an ass or a class clown? Even their married men claiming to be traditional are not putting their friends aside for their families. Marriage is a commitment.Forsaking ALL OTHERS. The biggest problem with America is this homosociality, you replaced the nuclear family for it. You are not homo married to your buddies. So that’s another arrow in the quiver of why women all secretly ‘hate’ men (but not all men) and won’t ever tell them. We have men bitter on forums at 7pm that there’s no wifey making dinner for them when they get back from work, when they’re actually seeking out the company of men online instead, for spousal emotional support. That’s faggoty. Friends are not a replacement spouse, they’re like wine uncles nagging about the Boomer ball and chain anti-nuclear family rhetoric so WTF. Who wants to marry that? It’s a support group of losers, most of the time. Shouldn’t you be with your family? Why are you here writing the same ‘articles’ for decades, blaming women for male failures in gender role instead of teaching your sons not to cuck? Btw blogger is not a job. This shit is not work. You shouldn’t get paid for this. It’s an online diary. The manosphere is functioning as a homosocial cult (excluding women to profiteer from its members, financially exploitative) so naturally women are avoiding them. They don’t functionally want a woman, they want other men. Let that sink in. That’s why Youtube hasn’t removed all sorts of angry anti-white (women) males from the platform. It’s a trap. A demographic trap. A Pied Piper of anti-white men propaganda, anti-white nuclear family, anti-patriotic and pro-foreign, convincing them to castrate themselves (cutely called the snip or in behaviour, becoming child-free meninists by choice*) before the Muslims do it. Yes, let’s sign up to breed with any male dumb enough to fall for castrating himself! Ladies, don’t crowd them! Form an orderly line!

*because nothing is more attractive than a person of EITHER sex bragging about their mental problems and sterility (which is usually actually caused by STDs, so it might be a cover story)

Seriously, as testosterone levels drop thanks to porn ejaculations (yes, production is finite in sperm too) and other bad habits, why would women want them? Do you want manjaw and fat high-T athlete shouldered women? So why are you entitled to be desired by women, despite being more woman-like yourself, including the endless nagging? Women are not responsible for the West, men are. Their gender role is moral authority in a marriage. A man invented the Pill. A male college professor in America was involved in the court case to give it to an unmarried couple. The politicians who wrote the Immigration Act were men. Yet all the manosphere does is nag women, for problems caused by men.

Rape gangs? Men.
Crime rates? Men.
Murder and terrorism? Men.
Nobody getting married and breeding? Men propose — or don’t.
Weak laws? Most judges and police are men.
Stupid hiring practices? The board is run by men.
Dodgy curriculum? Who funds and runs Marxist charities informing said teachers? Even a man founded Femen. Women see this, even if you play ignorant. Men play dumb all the time to their own responsibility, their own contribution to the Fall, the hypoagency is obscene, let alone the gaslighting about it and chickens are finally coming home to roost in a way you can no longer ignore. The manosphere is a broken record and women have long since tuned out. They never want to man up. They have retarded gender development, they have never mentally grown up and it shows. There are men who are like 40-50, grandfather age, still pondering if they’re ‘ready’ to become dad to an autist. They dawdle like women. They wouldn’t even fight off an invading force to save their own lives, so if that’s a man, we deserve whatever we get from China (who is funding the Marxist universities, btw, not da white wimmin). Personally, I hope for meteor strike.

What is the function of men?
Protector. Of his kin. Of his sired family later.

No woman can nor should try to bail men out of their gender role. You won’t give birth for us so it’s actually equal. Any man complaining women have it easy? Sign up to have a womb transplanted and give birth. No? Thought not.
Suck it up, buttercup. This is the world of your making. The Mary Whitehouse types warned you this would happen. You still mock them as jealous of you. They were Cassandra. They were correct. Nobody is jealous of degeneracy. It’s an option for everyone. Young people are rejecting it. Biology is real. Government can only coddle so long. The dam threatens to break still. Hot potato is a game only Boomers are old enough to play.

What does this male gender role mean, in practical terms?
Demographic protection.
Now, an awareness of this is present in all women. All of them. Subconsciously, women respond to the facts of white minority (there are studies about a perception of threat) and strangely dressed foreigners far more than men do. Why? Women rely on men to protect them, whether it’s 999 or whatever. The men expect another man to defend THEIR family and this extends nationally and racially. They feel no investment patriotically because the police protect them, cowards, from personal threat – temporarily.

In hindsight, replacing mob justice between families with the police was a mistake. It made men soft.

Immigrant ‘gangs’ are the new ‘police’ brewing, them genociding us. Currently they only pick off the occasional man, so cuck men let it slide. Without police protection, it’d be open season on whites and they’d suddenly care, long after women and children were targeted.

The modern man (or postmodern man) is not a man at all. He is a eunuch. So many wars were fought by his forefathers, so much blood was spilled, over thousands of years, so he could happily import invaders as ‘immigrants’ (PC term) to fill his factories (class traitor) and his bed (race traitor). You aren’t an alpha if your kids look adopted, you were genetically cucked. White genes are recessive. They are less than 50% yours, I had the term on another post ages ago, ask pol. But these are facts. If you cannot get one (1) hot woman to breed with you from your own group, that is not alpha. It’s omega. Omegas will lower their standards as much as necessary (rejected by the in-group, not all groups*) and women definitely perceive this (note the white women race mixing stats). The rest is high on copium. Look at the divorce rates of such males if you don’t believe me. Again, facts. Like their mongrel’s mental illness rates. From pol/:

*so any white woman could mix, it’s always an option, the omega option

They permit immigration, which is biologically invasion so mentally women think of them as cowards. They permit terrorism attacking their sons and rape gangs attacking their daughters, so where’s the main gender role of men? Even the police and army aren’t what they once were. Men have no function any longer. They have replaced themselves. They have cucked themselves for globalism. For the Beige People NWO OWG dream of Open Borders, whether it’s encoded in law or not. Practically, it’s the same Hippy Wet Dream. Men have abandoned their post and obviously, women hate them for this. The low trust society they chose, from fear. Continuous fear. They never correct it, many go along hoping to be killed by the invaders last. They would rather die out than be called insults by their enemies.
Imagine if any of their ancestors packed up because their enemies were trying to psych them out.
The species would’ve died long ago.

Men are the rarest thing now. Even so-called chad types (sluts aren’t the same as desirable mates but k) aren’t reproducing, which is ultimately what women want from men, so from a biological perspective it’s no wonder the birth rate is down because neither party is getting their needs met, men for emotional companionship (distracted by hook-ups) and women for protection and loyalty. Also, do men even like women any more or just want a wet hole? Hook-ups are inhumane, they treat other human beings like a sex toy, like a piece of plastic. There’s nothing to envy. It’s pathetic. Mainly they are just masturbating into these women for the approval of other weak-ego men (homosocial motives). Approval-seeking is weak. Men are supposed to validate themselves and the manosphere denies them this to sell them shitty books and ‘courses’. The slutty men are incapable of making love, whatever their claims, so goes through an endless parade of pussy (called girlfriends) because they cannot satisfy a single one of them with lovemaking, which is newsflash the only thing women want, physically. Have you met a sane woman who wanted to be fucked? Who made them that way? Damage goes both ways, and the book Hooked goes into the brain damage both sexes have from sleeping around (masturbating with other people like a psychopath would). Culture is now psychopathic, so why would women respect men? It’s a culture that hates everything women love – the nuclear family, pair bonding and commitment to one’s family. Psychopaths are statistically most sluts, psychopaths are nomads who never commit and are fond of novelty like xenophilia and they deadbeat their family, if they have one. Low IQ men (misogyny is a trait of them, as previously covered)* have been permitted by morally weak smart ones to set the standard for the mores of the West. How many college educated men used it like a free brothel, instead of finding a good wife? Why did we abolish breach of promise for cads? Society is shit because men made it like this. Women only follow where men morally or immorally lead. When has a woman ever started a moral trend? In all human history? Men establish the sexual mores, women just enforce them. There is nothing to enforce now. Look in the mirror for someone to blame, you all became the 30yo Boomer meme. You wanted a global brothel, you got it. You don’t get to fuck around like a witless farm animal then act all entitled like where da virgins at? You are neither entitled to respeK. Nor to ‘trade up’ – to which crop of pristine women? It’s the r-type dream of an untouched meadow for them to corrupt and destroy like sexual squatters. Where they exist they hide from the likes of you, you beasts who walk on two feet, claiming to be men. Rutting sluts deserve rutting sluts. R-types with r-types. K-types with K-types, you can’t change it because it’s how your brain developed. There’s a cap and you cannot go back. Virgins want other virgins, ask them and reee. Their heads explode when virgins tell them they’re disgusting. They are entitled to their own kind, with zero hypocrisy, not the slobbering gross old men who caught diseases in other countries, out-breeding. Hollywood lied to you. Again, Darcy was a virgin. (So was Jesus). Do women prefer him or the degenerate cad Mr Wickham? Which one do modern women prefer too? History will remember many modern white men as spiteful race-mixing sluts, who felt entitled to a pure, patriotic woman they never earned, after wasting decades on the Club Scene. Tragedy of the commons played out sexually. The statistics will also show this. The monomyth is about earning a woman. It isn’t about slaying a dragon, it’s overcoming your own temptation to lust. Choosing her over other women by y/our personal actions (no Muh Dick excuses). Anyone can pick a favourite dish after gorging on the whole buffet table! That’s a deadly sin. Actions speak louder than words. So many claim to be traditional but we women judge by sexual history, it cannot lie. We judge other women and also men. You risk death for the hand of the fair maiden because the wages of sin is death. Boomer Peterson won’t tell you this. It’s truth.

*they resent women because women reject them for low genetic fitness. See top of this post.

Hardcore HD pornography has ruined the West and pair bonding. It goes both ways. Both men and women are lesser quality. It’s just that women have the choice, to invest in the genetics of men or not.
And they are logically concluding not.
Why breed with the weak?
Why waste resources in a low trust, survival society, on cowards? They’d abandon their children, plenty already have (deadbeating) and other men have refused to hold them criminally accountable. Indeed, they blame helpless women and chldren for BEING abandoned, in the ultimate of anti-white victim blaming. It’s like saying why was your 11yo daughter wearing a mini-skirt in London around the Muslim immigrant? Crime is the fault of criminals, this is the First World and we used to have standards. Like don’t cuck for criminals. Anyone who makes excuses for rapists (a crime women consider worse than murder) is worse than serial killer simps. At least those guys are in prison. Meanwhile the manosphere accuses even virgins (child or adult) of making up a false rape accusation, which IS a spin, knowing it’s logically impossible to prove a negative re consent. AKA they hate you. They hate the West. They endorse rape. They write entire articles about rape like pedo-enablers talking about age of consent. They try to nudge the line and talk about ‘what’s rape, really?’ Like ‘what’s a minor, really?’ It’s the same Marxist moral relativism. You wonder why so many are single, or perma-divorced?
Women do not tolerate bullshit. We didn’t have these problems in an all-white (non-genocidal) safe society. The EU has admitted to this replacement agenda on their own website in the past, Hillary Clinton gleefully used the term ‘white genocide’ on TV and the manosphere still, oddly, refuses to address the Genocide Question in all but broadest brushstrokes. No actions for correction suggested. Yet more years of navel-gazing. Controlled opps.The pig pen of bitter men.
However, women are passive, so the men are stupidly taking ages to figure it out.
Women resent men for multiculturalism.
Historically, what happens after victory in every war?
A BABY BOOM.
Controlled by the women.
You cannot expect war victory spoils when you refuse to fight the war.
And invasion means war. Check the definition. It doesn’t need weapons. We’ve been at war since the first boats from Africa coming to London in the 40s (Windrush) and in America, moreso since the Immigration Act in the 60s that basically permitted long-term constant demographic invasion ever since.
You cannot expect a white society, from an increasingly non-white demographic.
You cannot expect the comforts of a high trust society, from a low-trust multiculturalism.
If the great Roman Empire can be felled by immvasion, none of the West is exempt. Where is your Coliseum? The McMansions won’t last a single century. It took Rome longer than that to decline.
So “men” cry out for general, societal respect and the women ask, why?
Because respect is earned.
It’s based on gender role. Something you do.
Men refuse to defend their country, and indeed, side with the enemies to the sons and daughters, then, much like the Marxist Boomers, wonder why they are despised by their own kin.
This has been World Civil War, for decades now. We fought two world wars so we wouldn’t have entire boats of foreigners invading. Immigration IS invasion and invasion is immigration. This is becoming blatant as the NWO types import invaders despite supposed health risks. It’s a lie, it always was. This isn’t for your safety or economy. It’s to destroy you.
Men pretend to be asleep, it’s easier. This has higher stakes than pretending you can’t use the washing machine.
If they had the will, mass deportations would largely fix this. It could be done in a year or two. If they refuse to leave peacefully, which they know they will (even if you cut off welfare, which is cucking for foreign families), then the war would go hot and men… do not care. They’d allow their baby cousin to get bent over by invaders if they could keep the fetish porn and video games.

That’s your side, guys.

When Hillary is on your side, it isn’t patriotic.
https://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/portfolios/clinton-mentions-white-genocide/

Women know this.
Women hate them for it.
Why do you think Marxist women infantilise immigrants?
They KNOW. They know it’s a war and conscious cucking may spare them, it eases cognitive dissonance as crimes rise. Because passivity is a trait of women and gamma men.
The rise in gamma men, not culled by a hot war, is the primary problem.
Subconsciously, those lefty women know the men are threats, they know the immigrant family down the road is stealing their national resources and intending to replace them by reproduction (a form of UN genocide).
They know. But what can the women do about it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It is NOT the female gender role. Powerlessness causes mental suppression. Did they speak of a rape culture pre-immvasion? Feminists blame weak white men for the actions of immigrants they permitted to invade. They’re right about that. The rest is window dressing.
So you get soyboys online complaining, why don’t women care about politics?
It isn’t politics you milquetoast little shits, it’s basic demographics.
Why have 2.2 kids in an area of 222 Chinese? When your taxes are funding all the latter? Check foreign aid, then come back.
Women hate race-mixing, especially white women, and they despise the idea of their children doing it the most. In a low trust society, women shut their legs to reproduction.

THE OVARIES ARE CLOSED.
CLOSED FOR BUSINESS.

Rather than mix, or force their kids to.

Women are waiting for men to man up and holding the race ransom or everyone dies out. It’s very simple. It’s a strike. It isn’t safe to have kids so they won’t. Women are not obliged, even in the Bible, to get married and have a family. That’s the somewhat secular Darwinian imperative. Jesus had no children. The baby cult is rekt.

ALL the evidence points to this hypothesis and NONE against in the entire world (nor historical examples like Rome).

They won’t tell you, men need to figure it out for themselves. It’s a FITNESS TEST.

We know this from the oxytocin and patriotism link. Happy women are more patriotic (so we know for a fact male xenophiles are depressed, whatever they claim, mixing is a mantrum, it’s sexual acting-out, it’s immature). Well, much like men refusing to sign up for a military that’s pozzed, why would women risk THEIR life in childbirth to bear the weaklings of cowards?

The planners know this. The Soros types. They know. If you make the men weak, the women DO NOT MATTER.
But I’m sure the gammas love to blame them. Isn’t it weird they, like trannies, mentally identify with women more than other men? Isn’t that perverse? Kinda deviant? Why not blame other men? Boris is right there. Trying to sign us back into the EU in all but name as a ‘green’ (anti-white, pro-China) trade agreement (EEC was).

In the late stages of Roman decline, do you imagine the wives respected their husbands? You know, the men they were forced to marry or starve? Rome fucked itself by outbreeding with its slaves, with weak genes. Do not breed with those of low genetic fitness, it’s the hard rule of Mother Nature. If you fuck around, she will fuck you up.
Women sensed a culling was in order and have refused, en masse, not to have children. Because babies get you killed in a hot war. We’ve had a cold war of immvasion across the West for decades, how much longer can it last? They say civil unrest, they say community conflict and other polite terms. From a woman’s perspective, what does that look like? It isn’t safe to settle here. Women are only wandering because men are wavering. It’s a game of chicken but either way, women win. Either men clean house and reclaim the West (purging all degeneracy, however much they like it) and everyone wholesome is happy or like Delilah the women ensure the killing blow of genetic weakness ending, in a mercy killing, so subsequent generations of white people don’t need to suffer being the trafficked slaves of the invaders (paging Rotherham, already happening) because their quisling dads were Judas tier scum and left the door open. More women want the death penalty than men – for whom?

Why does the treason continue?

Because the men have some grandiose group delusions, a different form of cultish NPC.
Sure, multiculturalism will magically fix itself! MAGICALLY. And immigrants are your friends.

They’ve all adopted the selfish Boomer attitude of ‘screw you all, I got mine’.
Do you imagine the immigrants will permit you any porn or any video games? Do you imagine they’ll let you even look at ‘their’ women without putting your eyes out?
There is no Magic Dirt. THIS GOES BOTH WAYS.
Immigrants can’t become white by colonising white countries.
And the white homelands cannot remain culturally civilized and high trust while introducing people from low IQ countries (even if the immigrants themselves are white, see Italian slums about a century ago).
Unlike the Boomers, they won’t get away with their ill-gotten gains.
In Revelations, it’s noted the sinners tried to hide from God. Why? Tower of Babel. An entire lesson in the evil and anti-Christ nature of multiculturalism. Why do they beg to be hidden?
They likely played the r-type game ‘let’s you and him fight’, which is all treason really is. It’s getting the out-group to fight your battles for you. Punching down at white women, after all the immigrant rape, and excusing it, enabling it, is about as low as it gets.
Do you expect women to have sympathy for this?

Women are letting the ship go down but you lot blew the holes in the side of the boat. Cause and effect chain of events.
If the captain won’t do his job, what do you expect us to do? Literally what, mate.

What good are men if they don’t protect their women? To paraphrase Putin. Is that a man? Do those genes deserve to continue? Call it FGTOW if you like. Either way, the ovaries are closed.
All women can do is react to the moral choices of men. The choices are immoral and ongoing so we have slim pickings in terms of options. Women endorse men with reproduction, not fucking. Rutting is for the beasts. Hollywood lies. So what does this say about women’s endorsement of the current crop of men?

The birth rate (and successful marriage rate, which causes wedded births) is a function of homogeneity in a society. Deal with it.
As you increase multiculturalism, women feel more stressed in low trust society and the cortisol makes them fat, manly, angry and unwilling to have kids. The genetic, biological cascade is CAUSED by the environment. This is basic Darwin. We adapt to our environment, for survival or thriving. Now women are in survival mode, did you expect it to be pretty? Thinner? Nicer? More nubile?
Women are like other animals with the intuition, sensing impending danger. The nesting instinct is a prepper response.
Men are playing Chicken Little while enabling their own genetic destruction. They won’t be left to sit happily in the corner once outnumbered by invaders.
They are evolutionally, fatally stupid. Women cannot save them, we are not your mother and you’re no longer a little boy.
The invaders (immigrants, whatever term) once they have the numbers, will kill him and take all his stuff.
It happened in caves and it’s already happening on the micro in schools with white minorities now.
If this is how white men die out, God says they deserve it. You’re supposed to honour thy mother and father, you needn’t like them. There is a duty to protect one’s kin and homelands – from invaders. From the Tower of Babel situation, from the multicultural trading posts of Babylon and the whoredom of Sodom.
It’s literally in the book. Solomon was literally said to have a weakness for foreign women that took him AWAY from the Lord.
The good Samaritan parable is misunderstood. You do not permit them to stay. Guest right is for a guest, that is temporary. If the guest started stealing things and leeching off them (thou shalt not steal, welfare for the out-group is anti-Christ) then the reaction would’ve been different. Sell your cloak to buy a sword. Against whom? Your kin or invaders who threaten them? Love your neighbour as yourself has direct genetic implications. Thessalonians says if a man shall not work, he should not eat. Yet do men stop welfare to people with another home? Nope. They cuck. For the dual passport holders ready to bail on us, should we ever actually need them, they cuck. They literally fund the families of the genetic out-group and bleat about it to women.
In the UK, at least, white women tend to vote Conservative. Men vote Labour, see Clause 4. Men vote for Marxism. Maybe out of stupidity that they care about ‘workers’ or a hatred of hard work (no bootstraps required). Academic Agent should do a voting pattern video (since ww2) but won’t.
Men have let down the team.
You see so many expats who can’t keep their trap shut and sounds like old hags, shrewish women. You’ll be sorry doom-monger types. This is a psyop.
Take the Black Pigeon Speaks type, that love the idea fellow white people are suffering, from bombings, from rapes, from trafficking, the gleeful ‘blackpill’ reporting any other era, any other time period would’ve correctly described as treasonous.
Men have bought into multiculturalism. Women still and have always hated one another. Sisterhood is impossible. Brotherhood is temporarily possible for the smart men to replace the dumb ones (or trusting, gullible weak ones) because men are pack hunters and are erroneously viewing the out-group as potential allies, rather than historic, genetic, permanent enemies. If I were in someone’s house at 2am, I’m not there for a kind reason. Same is true at zero hour of a country, poised for a racial pogrom. The dehumanizing stage of white people has already begun. There are no Good Ones, if immigrants hated the West so much they wouldn’t be here. It’s gaslighting and it’s working.
The relational aggression between men hasn’t evolved because air transport is so novel. Men have yet to adapt. Women had to function in large groups of hundreds in primal times so relational aggression is protective of our kin. Men do not have this. Men, especially weak ones, will try to get along. Like small fish trailing a bigger one. You see entire forums where they side with their enemies to drag down their own women. Isn’t that sickening? Oh but why oh why won’t the women risk everything for them?
Why? So they can be deadbeated? So the guy can hand her the cricket bat at 2am? So he can stand idly by and forgive the immigrant who raped his 8yo daughter and the ‘immigrant’ siblings who drove the 16yo brother to suicide with hate crime style school bullying?
Why oh why don’t white women like them?
THAT’S THE IMPORTANT QUESTION HERE. WOMEN ARE SO HUGE ON SOLIPSISM OBVIOUSLY.
Statistically, most narcissists are – nevermind. [men, it’s men]

(Blackpill Bingo Game: replace all the actions of immigrants with invader and see which fits better, they even cuck for vikings now, that’s the people who raped virginal nuns if you’ll recall).

Guess we just ‘hate’ men. Not like, foreign men, but just literally all men. That makes sense. Literally every man, regardless of conduct. Regardless of religion. Regardless of moral compass and hypocrisy in deed.
Just muh All Men.
Can’t see any reasons, can you?
No, don’t see anything wrong with their conduct – according to the Marxists. They’re perfect little multicultural cucklings, cheering on their own demographic death. Their quisling anti-white behaviour is impeccable. Indeed, stand and hold open the gates as long as the invaders have an additional hole for you to fuck, while you’re fucking over your country/men financially. Then complain about ‘immigration’, to top off the sheer arrogance of it. (Patriotism is not homoerotic, man on man action, it’s white men liking white women and not foreigners, m/f).
Why not, after all? How many immigrants has Nigel Farage imported as concubines? Why would we expect consistency from men? They’re not thinking with their big head. They’re emotional.
Brotherhood in the manosphere is just a warmed over Open Borders anyway. They are not real men and women sense this. They fail in the primary gender role of men. Their ultimate purpose for their life.
Women have never wanted to open the borders (brainwashed children repeating schoolteachers do not count and anti-fa is mostly male).

So do women hate men?
They fear foreigners because if you don’t get raped, your kids will. Or your sons will have to fight a war you refuse to, at some point.
Native men?
Only the enablers, the xenophiles and the cucks. Those are all the same group, whatever differences they pretend.
Some women may be able to lie to themselves consciously (Guardianistas) but the ovaries don’t lie.
Learn from history or be a page in it.
If the West doesn’t halt the steady stream of sewage, let alone start throwing it out, don’t blame us womenfolk when everything starts to smell like shit.
We don’t hate you, per se, we hate that you’re smelling of shit. Just stop smelling of shit. Just get rid of the shit. It isn’t fucking difficult, you evolved for it. No nagging ‘but that isn’t equal, we expect to be compensated’. Living in a high trust civilization with slender nubile wives is the compensation, you morons. It doesn’t just happen. Being respected by your society is the compensation because you earned it, idiots. And nobody gets ‘compensated’ BEFORE doing the work, socialists. You do the work, THEN compensation. The peacock shows the feathers are big and healthy, THEN he gets the peahen tail. In this game of ovarian chicken, you will lose, it’s a question of whether you kill your own kind in doing so. Will white men let their omegas take them all down, out of spite? Why not voting rights ONLY to any white man married to a white woman? No? Why ever not? That’s the only tradition. This would exclude your sterile omega cucks and CCP spies (to pull a ‘Jeremy Hunt’). Women are not obliged to breed with the weak and the treasonous. There is no other viable option to women currently.
Do women hate all men?
Kinda.
We especially hate it when they import wars they’re too cowardly to openly fight.
And that’s why everyone hates Boomers, who started the spigot of pure shit.
Only to bitch and nag and whine when their grandchildren complain about the stench.

We hate navel-gazers saying women are the problem (really it’s the Asian Question, read the Census and who votes bigger gov) and when they aren’t being openly, spitefully anti-white as your local anti-fa group (they’d fit right in), it’s the futile ‘when’s the war? talk. You’re already in it. They’ve already been turned against Their Women, which is play 1 in the book of war psyops. They refuse to acknowledge this, instead going along with anti-white propaganda, when some of it flatters them. You bitches are not Nikola Tesla, you have accomplished absolutely nothing in the easiest times to be alive ever. You aren’t even drafted, little piggy. Teen boys used to beg to be allowed to serve their country and defend their homeland below proper age. Those teen boys had more honour than you ever will. Successful people don’t insult their forefathers who bravely died for them, they don’t nag about The West (you ARE the West) to suck off the funding foreigners and they don’t degrade their own women (it’s like keying your own car). Wake up and smell the propaganda drop. It smells of invader bullshit. You all lack in masculine character. Blackpill is really just Yellowpill, the Asian supremacy cucking. The NWO plan to replace Western dominance with Eastern. They admit it. Do you imagine such corrupt societies will treat you kindly? They have an excess of men, meaning there’s no use for you. When you find yourself praising the CCP just like CNN, pause to consider whether you might’ve been tricked by anti-white propaganda. Rule one in the war book is to make the enemy hate their own kind and make them hopeless. In WW2 we dropped sexually mocking papers describing how their (enemy) women preferred foreign dick. Turn them against their own culture. It 100% fits. Why do you imagine social media keeps up those twitter accounts? Those Youtube channels? Why doesn’t it take those down? It’s Marxist in method, it’s Marxist in intent and it’s Marxist in result. Use your big brain.

Women will never forgive, let alone respect and breed at historic high-trust numbers with their men, until the safety of that high trust society is restored. That is the undeniable fact of the matter.

The ones who deny the ongoing genocide much like the Red Army rapes when it’s happening to women, boys and girls before their very eyes in highly public court cases is a great reason to hate someone. If not for treason, then for what?

You can’t spell treason without reason.

Mary Whitehouse should be patron saint of 4chan, at this point. She was right before Enoch. Nobody else foresaw drag time story hour or child strippers in gay bars dressed in drag. She did. She walked so Enoch could run.
https://www.defendevropa.com/2018/news/enoch-powell-why-they-hate-him/
Politics being downstream of culture. Times are never different, people are still shit. Now men are making the same Marxist ‘mistake’ and being anti-Enochs (for ‘diversity’). There is no blackpill, there is only yellowpill. Cuckpill. Cowardpill. You don’t get to complain about your smell, other people have been able to detect it for a while. J’accuse, Judas.

Have fun being dog dads, you fucking degenerates. [This happened in late Rome too. Ask reddit.]

Reminders of treason for false believers

Treason alongside other unclean-ness can be financial as well as sexual and cultural (xenophilia).

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Seduction

“My son, if sinners entice you, Do not consent.” Prov 1:10

To deliver you from the strange woman, – Prov 2 (synonym: foreign)

But because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. – 1 Cor 7:2-3

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, – 1 Timothy 4:1 anti-natalism is the Satanic principle of their religion.

They are cowards who fear an actual Biblical society for men:
“”If a man seduces a virgin who is not engaged, and lies with her, he must pay a dowry for her to be his wife. “If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the dowry for virgins.” – Exodus, Yes you need to pay the woman, you took something from her. Sex is physical, including rape. It is a theft. To act like sex is nothing (fun is an innocent thing for children, not a synonym for vice) or a mere form of exercise is Satanic. Man is not a rutting beast. Muh dick logic doesn’t fly.

“If there is a girl who is a virgin engaged to a man, and another man finds her in the city and lies with her, then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city and you shall stone them to death; the girl, because she did not cry out in the city, and the man, because he has violated his neighbor’s wife. Thus you shall purge the evil from among you. “But if in the field the man finds the girl who is engaged, and the man forces her and lies with her, then only the man who lies with her shall die” – Deut 22 #MeToo is ironically Biblical. We should hold sexual terrorists accountable.
PUAs strangely silent on this one. God forbid we hold men accountable for what they do with their body. There are no second chances to rape in a Christian patriarchy. As it should be.

Seduction is made plain as evil: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/2-Samuel/13
and still on America’s legal books from a better time.

“11 But as soon as she brought them near him to eat, he overpowered her and told her, “Come here and have sex with me, my sister!”” When refused:

“14 But he refused to listen to her, and because he was stronger than she was, he raped her.”

But sure, blame women. And this causes the weakness in low IQ men called misogyny:

“15 After this, Amnon hated Tamar with such intensity that the hatred he hated her with was greater than the love he had loved her with. “Get out of here!” he said.”

Then we get the gaslighting instead of a trial.

“20 Later, her brother Absalom asked her, “Has Amnon, that brother of yours, raped you? Then keep quiet about your half-brother for now, my sister. Stop taking this so personally.” From that time on, Tamar lived in continuous desolation within her brother Absalom’s house.”

28 Then Absalom instructed his young men, “Please keep watching Amnon until he’s drunk. Then I’ll tell you, “Attack Amnon!’ As soon as I do, kill him and don’t be afraid! You have your orders, so be strong and brave!”

Yet they complain women aren’t held responsible… projection. Fish rot from the head, societies are ruined by weak men.

29 So Absalom’s young men did to Amnon just as Absalom had commanded. Then all the rest of the king’s sons got up, and each fled on his mule.

Men have been dodging holding one another responsible for rape for eons. If you permit rapists to attack your women, God will kill you all off and you’ll deserve it. So you see, the West mostly deserves to die. According to this lesson in the Bible, at least. You should kill them and let God sort them out.

38 After fleeing to Geshur, Absalom remained there for three years.

(David went soft during this time).

What do you expect from an adulterer? This is why the rule of men has failed, none of them punished one another. The Bro code is multicultural hypoagency, overtly anti-God.

16 So the king left, taking his entire household with him except for ten mistresses, who were to keep the palace in order. – 2 Sam 15

21 Ahithophel responded, “Go inside and have sex with your father’s mistresses, whom he left to keep the palace in order. Then everyone in Israel will hear how your father has come to hate you and everyone who has joined you will be emboldened to act.” – 2 Sam 16 that’s called rape actually

Men writing one another blank cheques to be whores is nothing new. That is why women loathe modern men, they earned it. Sexual disgust is based on actions, not chromosomes. What such men merit respect? None. Where is their conscience?

Fornication/rape of ten women because rape of one is also a sin? As Carlin said, fucking for virginity? Men are illogical. This is why humans mostly deserve Hell. The double standards. Nobody is exempt. That’s why it’s a standard.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/2-Samuel/18

or King David could’ve practised the Word of God and just killed the rapist like a real man. You shouldn’t have raised a rapist. You deserve to grieve the rapist you made. This could have all been avoided if your sons weren’t whores.

18:14 “There’s no reason to wait for you!” Joab retorted. Then he took three spears in his hand and stabbed Absalom in the heart while he was still alive, dangling from the branches of the oak tree.

The wages of sin.

Absalom should’ve done his duty and avenged Tamar instead of banishing her and telling her to get over it. But muh bro code got them all killed.

2 Sam 19:4 Meanwhile, the king veiled his face and kept on crying loudly, “My son Absalom! Absalom my son, my son!”

What about Tamar???

You raised two rapists while whoring around yourself. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Solomon, who consorted with demons, also bedded them in possession of foreign women.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/1-Kings/11/1

“Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women,”

The reason the Bible warns of the danger of seductive women.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/Proverbs/7/5

“From the foreigner who flatters with her words.”

God made you what you are, do not trespass those bounds.

https://www.learnreligions.com/woman-at-the-well-700205

“During his encounter with the woman at the well, Jesus broke three Jewish customs. First, he spoke to her despite the fact that she was a woman. Second, she was a Samaritan woman, and the Jews traditionally despised Samaritans. For centuries Jews and Samaritans had rejected each other. And, third, he asked her to get him a drink of water, although using her cup or jar would have made him ceremonially unclean.

…To fully grasp the story of the woman at the well, it’s important to understand who the Samaritans were–a mixed-race people, who had intermarried with the Assyrians centuries before. They were hated by the Jews because of this cultural mixing and because they had their own version of the Bible and their own temple on Mount Gerizim.”

Sixth Commandment is a command to keep God’s designed bloodlines clean. This is also a Jewish principle and explains their success neatly versus mixed, mongrelized populations. Inbreeding < Outbreeding.

https://bible.org/seriespage/3-can-we-believe-immortality

When we approach the Bible on the subject of immortality, it is well to have in mind a few important facts that are basic and necessary to a proper understanding of the subject. Nowhere in the Bible is the expression to be found, “the immortality of the soul.” Nor is there written anything about “the immortal soul.” We are not suggesting for a moment that Scripture teaches anything about the sleep or annihilation of the soul at death. The thought of the soul’s endless being is true enough, but it is not Scriptural language to refer to “the immortality of the soul.” The Word of God assumes the eternal existence of every soul regardless of its destiny. Every man’s soul is immortal and can never be annihilated. Jesus said: “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul; but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell” (Matthew 10:28).

Now those who teach “soul-sleep” would have us believe that their doctrine is Biblical, when actually they have falsified the facts by their misinterpretation of Scripture. Man can kill the body, but that is the worst he can do. God alone can take hold of both body and soul and condemn them.

It is true we read: “The soul that sinneth, it shall die” (Ezekiel 18:4),

but neither here nor elsewhere in Scripture does a reference to the soul dying mean a state of non-existence, or even one of unconsciousness. The Bible teaches that there are three kinds of death and it distinguishes clearly between each. First, there is physical death, or the separation of the soul from the body. This is the death of the body to which reference was made in Hebrews 9:27, “It is appointed unto men once to die.” Second, the Bible teaches that there is a spiritual death. This is the separator of the soul from God, the condition of all unbelievers of whom Paul says they are “dead in trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1), and “alienated* from the life of God” (Ephesians 4:18). Third, there is eternal death or banishment from God. All who suffer eternal death are conscious, but “shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord” (2 Thessalonians 1:9), these “have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death” (Revelation 21:8).

*the Other, the out-group

nb. Adam chose to eat of the tree, despite a direct warning from God. Nobody mentions this.

“In ADAM all die” – 1 Cor 15:22 so the PUA types blaming Eve/women are literally giving you false words, Adding to the Word.
You follow false prophets, anti-natal monsters.
You follow dead men in how to live your barren life. “A man who finds a wife finds a good thing”, “more precious than rubies” and “love her because she is a woman”.

They believe the lies of the mixed population (including certain bloggers), who project their unclean status onto the West and its men and women. Then be gone from us and go back from whence you came. We never wanted you here.

“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Corinthians 15:22).

The evangelical arrogance of Americans is to think proclaiming yourself a Christian makes you so. A corpse identifying as dead is not made living. You will only know if you’re going to Hell when you die. Vanity does nothing. Their belief is easy to question, since they preach against the Bible per se. The door of death will be closed to them. The Afterlife does not exist for all or even most people (the way is narrow). They deny this. They deny God.
Preaching one thing with your words (HYPOCRITE) and another with your actions (endorsing anti-natal, Molechian practice) is not Christian. 1 Peter 4:15 “busybody in other people’s matters” – influencer.
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Minding-Your-Own-Business
There is no rest for the wicked, they must constantly corrupt others and finally destroy themselves.

FI

Humans don’t say ‘you broke my brain’ we say ‘you broke my heart’. The heart stores the soul and its memories. The heart and brain both cannot regenerate in humans. Once damaged, medical science gives you a short timer. So this era is interesting in the biggest COD being heart disease. A reprobate mind/heart?

The trades are mostly for dunces

I’m tired of the low IQ cope, m-m-muh six figs, it’s almost as if women DON’T CARE about money, if they’d have intellectually disabled kids. Kinda like women evolved to avoid unfit men, in spite of bribes and gaslighting! Your sweet rims aren’t the thing they’d be breeding with, women don’t judge your stuff, they judge you. Almost like women don’t wanna bear some grandiose narcissist’s retard babies, for any price! I mean, it’s not like IQ is mostly genetic, eh? Women would rather have NO kids – than stupid or ugly ones. Look at what they do. One of the most common, valid abortion reasons men seldom mention – eugenics, i.e. aborting the stupid. It’s a waste of resources, sorry. What, would they oppose this? It’s hypocritical. Women should be praised for doing that, for making the tough choices, like the Nordic country where downies are going extinct – that saves taxpaying men a fortune! Their understanding of morality is oversimplified and lachrymose, like the complaints about women preferring to be alone and save for retirement minus kids than shorten your female lifespan by marrying a dead-weight dullard husband. Shaming women about any of this will not work. It’s like telling men to fancy fatties. Their assumptions are ‘equality’ and therefore wrong, because evolution and biology exist. Women are not the sex that wants kids (who still kill us), it’s generally men, as competition with other men. Otherwise all single women would be down the sperm bank getting Chad’s Superspunk. I shuddered typing that. nb. Why do Americans think women want kids? Polish women when surveyed (covered here previously) do not want kids so it isn’t religious. For most of history, that was not a choice for women. Postcards from the Fifties lied. If women could outsource their gender’s primary fatality risk to robo-wombs, that’d be great. Men already did that with drones and draft-dodging. In addition, why would women feel compelled to breed with cowards? What causes post-war baby booms? Considering certain crime waves invading the west, why are the local wombs suddenly closing up shop? This isn’t rocket science, it’s survival and I’m sick of nobody pointing out the obvious. Deportations then birth rates is the only way to fix it. But they’re too chicken. Those whom the gods would destroy….

This graph was adapted from Figure 12 of Hauser, Robert M. 2002. “Meritocracy, cognitive ability, and the sources of occupational success.” CDE Working Paper 98-07 (rev). Center for Demography and Ecology, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. The figure is labelled “Wisconsin Men’s Henmon-Nelson IQ Distributions for 1992-94 Occupation Groups with 30 Cases or More” and is found at http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/cdewp/98-07.pdf

https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/Occupations.aspx

Honestly, if you throw away your life because a manosphere blog told you to, you deserve it. Not one of those guys is happy.

“I made the money, where’s da girls?” It was never the money, it was you – aiming too high. Stay in your league. Looks and IQ correlate, hot girls just play dumb so men aren’t intimidated or leave them alone (or crazies get violent, low IQ causes criminality). Men making money and complaining women don’t want them is like a fat girl complaining men don’t want them in spite of the big tits – they don’t count, it was never about those and they do not count.

We can all anecdote an exception of a high IQ trade person, I have relatives like that, but they did trades on the SIDE, after proving their IQ with harder qualifications, including IT and there’s no doubt in their mind which is harder. You could technically teach a monkey to use a spanner. Imagine you call a plumber and there’s a chimp with a wrench. Sexy? I think not. Alas, I’d pay to see that.

But high IQ people can do your whole job as a side project and we see it terrifies you.

Die mad.

The manosphere pretend they’re all special snowflakes when they’re just normies who hate women. Not even sluts, or they’d hate men too. They aren’t super cool action heroes in their own movie, nobody is jealous of them. They never develop mentally past the teens and it shows.

It’s like how Peterson makes normies feel special by talking about Disney, of all the trash. It’s literally about rescuing women, hardly war and peace, bucko. It is folk memory from a time of tribal war.

I consider the trades a fallback myself, having completed a ‘cake’ course or two at the same place many of them are taught in this country (City & Guilds). I completed those assignments in a single afternoon. That’s how dumb they are. It’s like BTECs and international baccalaureates. The slow students with rich parents think it counts. I was talked out of them – by people who TEACH them – because I could ‘do better’. Yet they lie to keep their job and say baccalaureates in particular are harder, begging the question – for dumb people, everything is harder. Proof: The teachers of IBs do not have IBs – they need real qualifications.

Anything learning by rote is low IQ, sorry, and you WILL be replaced by robots imminently.

It isn’t international because building codes and such vary. Trades are to a NATIONAL standard, have you never checked? I checked when I was like fifteen.

FYI

https://www.quora.com/How-do-the-average-IQs-rank-by-profession-Which-professions-have-the-highest-IQs?share=1

Meanwhile, I’m really into perfumes lately.
Organza, Quatre, Soleil and Roma. For my two female readers.

The bitter bachelors of the manosphere

It is an excuse not to self-improve, while also obsessing about all women and blame-shifting onto the Other. Clarey mentioned fake MGTOW years ago. The actual misogynists who cope with extreme interpretations of the Wall and other concepts, ignoring data about men. Not redpill, fake Ks.

They don’t need a ‘good woman’, they’d only abuse her for not magically fixing them like Fairy Godmother (or is that Pussy Godmother?) but they do need therapy. Many seem to have PDs, the devaluation of NPD, the seductive slutting of HPD and no identity while single of BPD.

Ad hominem doesn’t work. Like Republicans being called deplorables, you’re not gonna change hearts. It’s all huge procrastination to avoid looking at yourself. I can’t remember who said but manosphere should be a pitstop to make the changes and you leave it behind a few years later. The bitter guys need to justify their failures to themselves – being single, no kids, whatever the case may be. I wouldn’t mind except they’re corrupting men who might’ve been happy and functional without hearing their poison.

The biggest threat here? Men corrupting younger men.

There are post-wall men on like marriage number 4 daring to lecture the rest of us on degeneracy. Fuck right off? There are also multiple copes they cannot ignore forever e.g. impaired pair bonding in men they call ‘player burnout’ but c’mon, it’s alpha widowhood. Modern men are aging like milk. Most humans are. Most people have trash DNA anyway, and will age badly. Aging well is unusual in both sexes, and something often seen in families, regardless of sex. It seems like the opposite of stoicism – they deny their mortality and aging process. The entitlement to a young waifu is silly. You bring nothing to the table but bitterness thinly concealing long-buried shame. Some go so far as to justify cheating when their wife gets ‘old’ or ‘busy’ (looking after his kids). Those deserve to be alone. Sexual selection is functioning. Not once has one openly gone through the fire of admitting they regretted being a slut, wasting years being the manwhore Hollywood told them they were, useless without. Until they’re honest with themselves, they’ll never move on from the buried shame. I’ve known men IRL do this, I know it works. They are now happy.

Nobody is entitled to another human being. If you cannot ATTRACT one, the common denominator is YOU.

This epidemic of fake masculinity seems to be coming to a head, much like the ‘level-up’ women faking their femininity by adopting a whole new persona. Both groups are crazy. Like actually insane. I’ve warned of both. A bit of that would be fine but they become delusional with bravado and ego.

and everybody clapped

One time, this Big Red SJW crossed with Trigglypuff showed up at his workplace, and he punched her for talking about pronouns, and everybody clapped. Sure it was just on a forum but it’s 100% true because nobody lies on forums, that’s illegal.

I see where the atheistkult emptied out to. These guys are cancer to any belief system, becoming total laughing stocks with their gamma arrogance i.e. Superior to every woman because Manly Man card, amirite? Because it isn’t like women read more books than men, is it? Nope, it’s a macho manly hobby because THOSE EXIST.*

*The only manly hobby is pissing standing up.

The MLM for men

It’s like the college ponzi of teaching people to become teachers, ad nauseum, plus the dudebro hustle cult of status signalling (I don’t need sleep!) and a cult of personality, all in one.

I guess they got the idea from Shillshare, the website with expensive youtube videos by cucky liberals you’ve never heard of, who are apparently famous in their field. E-celeb cancer mostly. Or originally from the rare people (not celebs) who actually have world tier skills and have a course to save time. Those are rare. Can you use it on your CV? If no, not a real course.

Shillshare is literally a pyramid scheme of signing up to encourage other people to sign up.

The finance guys will definitely get sued. Buy high they’ve been teaching, that’s easy to prove in court. Hundreds of videos in evidence. This pushes up the value of their own investment. Do they mention this? No. Greater fool theory is not acumen.

The only thing worse are the cult forums where they’re like a hivemind of negativity claiming to be blackpill. The SJWs do it, as do MRAs (fake MGTOWs, chasing after random women to harass them*). Some other groups like vegans and eco-warriors have similar gaslighting but not personal life-ruining.

“What did you spend your youth doing anon?”

“Bitching on a forum about men/women/vitamin B/the pandas”.

“….Oh. Worth it?”

“No.”

It’s an excuse to be lazy and narcissistic (ruining the lives of others to soothe their own insecurity). Cluster B men do this.

Look at cult indicators, some forums are getting like that. How DARE you disagree with the charismatic leader! Drink the Kool Aid because you’re not some pussy conformist, are you? We have a monopoly on truth but religion is silly!

Blackpill is temporary pieces of confirmation about who the evil is (NWO), depressing people into sticking around and paying for your shitty courses is 1. mental/emotional abuse and 2. classic con artist.

Men can emotionally abuse other men.

Oddly, the manosphere forbids you from discussing that possibility.

If you really got a better life (rich bachelor or wife/kids, w/e), would they lose money by losing you?

If so, don’t listen to them. It’s a poison apple.

*A 14yo on youtube is not your ex-wife. Verbally abusing other women as a stand-in is classic Cluster B splitting.

Graham Stephan – Aaron Clarey reader/ripoff?

First thing ya gotta know about me. I cannot stand ripoff merchants.

Listen to this ‘explanation’ in full.

I – I – me – me. Credit thief.

Graham (Shekels) Stephan: “I highly recommend everyone do… What I call house hacking-” (12:10-45)

Do you, Graham? DO YOU.

Now read this, after watching that whole part of the video (10:36 on).

All this advice of “his” on his ‘channel’ is eerily similar…
From Bachelor Pad Economics, page number retained.
Check up on me.

“Guys this is all my idea mine mine mine!”

But how dare people now ask him for advice on his advice channel about the economy.
What do you people think he is, an economist?

I knew he had a rat face, I just couldn’t place why. Bad bone structure, lower IQ (but cunning), it’s a pretty solid connection. Credit thieves typically have that weaselly look. Look at the shoulders, a random soy doesn’t stumble across this info.

I could have done a massive post like this cross-referencing all the times I’ve seen over the years that Shekels Stephan has ripped off our favourite actual Jew Clarey but 1. nobody would read it and 2. I abhor formatting.

https://www.audible.com/pd/Poor-Richards-Retirement-Audiobook/B071W9R8L7
“When mastered, house hacking can save you thousands of dollars in monthly expenses, build tens of thousands of dollars in equity each year, and provide the financial means to retire early. In fact, the average house hacker can turn a single-family home or small multifamily property into a cash-flowing investment.”

I’ve never heard a shred of credible financial advice from Graham’s showy corner of the internet, that I didn’t first read many moons ago by Clarey, an actual economist (and former teech-eeeer).
In the screencap was Graham’s whole plan, which he steals full credit for. Funny how a kid would happen to know as much as a man one generation older with a totally different training skillset, including years in banking – when little Graham was still growing pubes.

How does Graham know all the things he ‘knows’? He never says. How convenient.

In these unusual times, he has no advice (see the pinned comment)

A note for everyone: It’s become evident that a lot of you want me to address what’s going on with the markets. I totally get it, I find those topics extremely insightful to talk about, but I don’t want to make that the entire focus of my channel right now. I’ll absolutely make videos on that each week as things progress, but otherwise I believe in the buy and hold philosophy. As bad as things might get in the short term, eventually things will recover.

based on….?

eventually you dead so…?

Stay safe, double down on work, cut back on expenses, and invest long term. And smash the like button.

As you can see, he bizarrely goes dry as a nun’s vagina for advice (or basic OPINIONS) and flees like a coward from the millions asking him economic Qs because without a Clarey script to read from, he has no expertise or knowledge whatsoever.

How odd that his bounteous wisdom happens to dry up! There is nothing to pull from. If I were Clarey, I’d put out a trivial piece of fake info (or something a clickbait ad revenue thieving moron like Graham would misinterpret from his ignorance) to watch him humiliate himself and prove it conclusively. Maybe a new “recession-proof” plan?

Book Bachelor Pad… was published way before Graham set up his channel, before anybody asks. Years prior.

I can’t stand thieves.

The least he could do is plug Clarey’s retirement book, but maybe he’s planning on releasing his own “book” written all by “himself” (and Ctrl+C).

This explains his random rage video about staying single out of spite, he’s been reading the manosphere for years. The anti-family propaganda sank deep.

He’s been reading, and ripping off its authors. I’d sue. That’s ad revenue from Clarey’s copyright.

The problem with meditation rituals +IQ

Not meditation as in thought, contemplation but the Indian-seeming ritual.

Not yoga, which is a made-up substitute religion sold to Boomers, I already linked about that (it was in the New Yorker too).

Skip to the end at the IQ bit if you don’t care about genetic load and IQ as a related tangent.

New Age meditation is for rich people to pretend they have problems. If they were spiritual at all, they’d quit their vices. They would see how vice harms them and their soul. They connect with nothing real. It’s a hallucination projected on their bubble.
Meditation as it’s sold in the West is an opiate for idiots, they’re already mindless drones of conformity. As a form of prayer, it’s egocentric (muh Higher Self – do you mean Holy Spirit?). As a biological thing, Muh Scientism, it over-develops the parietal lobe (a bad thing, sloth ensues, fine if you’re a mountain man?) at the expense of the frontal lobe (a VERY bad thing, they’re crippling their critical thinking, humans need that rationality). An IQ study in fully developed adults who start meditation would be interesting, but they’d never be able to find a publisher* for the fact, with a good method, IQ would go down. Imagine all the products they couldn’t sell! The horror!

*Why you never hear the downsides of many antisocial practices, but meditation does reduce in-group loyalty, which “they” actually want (less genophilia, less love of your family where it should be, with your KIN). Phrased like that, the “love” rhetoric falls flat. If you cannot love your kin, you don’t love. Anyone.

Can Meditation Increase IQ?

Though no standardized test was developed as a result, the study interestingly demonstrated head size has almost nothing to do with intelligence.

True.

Also, women can have larger heads than men and the men who don’t get this… are morons.

IQ is simply a good method for representing intelligence in an individual, compared to the general population. IQ testing has its limits, but there is a reason for its sustained and wide acceptance in psychology.

You have to act on your IQ. Bitching on reddit how “misunderstood” you are is worse than being average.

Genuine intelligence does seek out truth though, not just info to show off.

The biggest contributors, such as…

  • Genetics
  • Conditions in utero
  • Experiences at a very young age

…were never much under our control.

Yes, an individual’s IQ score can vary mildly throughout life, and more can almost always be learned, but there is simply very little evidence that intelligence itself can be increased over time.

It can’t. Anyone who says otherwise is selling you something. Most of it’s genetic.

Attention gains are often just using the idiot-phone less and avoiding EMF.

Think about it – where do they meditate? Low EMF areas. What don’t they do? Check their phone every five minutes. It isn’t the ritual. Put down the Apple products.

So wherever you are in the distribution, whether or not you’ve even taken an IQ test, is where you’ve been from a young age and where you will stay.

It’s a big pill to swallow.

That’s the main red pill. Most men in particular refute this and become full-blown sociologists (sociologist fallacy) going on and on about nurture-theories. Noooope.

DNA is destiny, dude.

Plus, logically, if your score were already high… you wouldn’t feel a need to increase it?

Hey, I’m just being rational, pretty sure that’s illegal. As a woman.

A study published by Dan Simons and colleagues looked at these brain training games, and only found:

  • Strong evidence of subjects improving in the trained tasks themselves. Meaning, the more they played the game, the better they got at the game.
  • Less evidence that subjects had improved performance at closely-related tasks.
  • Little evidence that the subjects increased performance on distant-related tasks (anything outside the game, in the real world) or enhanced their everyday cognition in general (meaning, no raise in IQ).

Let them profit off idiots. By going for that IQ boost stuff, you’re admitting you’re low IQ already.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1529100616661983

It’s like men who take dating advice from other men, especially bachelors. At least talk to really old, happily married men? But noooooo. Or since the sexes are mentally different, talk to women about how they assess men to become the best competitor (and other men ARE your competition). …And they wonder why they attract angry, manjaw women – because they’re vibing with what another man told them.

Men also tend to give one another terrible advice, consciously or subconsciously to scupper competition. Rarely even trust relatives, same fact sadly holds with women.

Money shot:

Meditation can’t increase intelligence because there is little evidence intelligence can be increased by anything at all.

That’s it, that’s the fact.

ANYTHING. AT ALL.

Stop looking.

However, meditation can help you increase your IQ score by sharpening your mind and maximizing your ability to focus.

No such thing. Marketing gimmick you cannot measure (see study above, no real results, self-report is crap). ADD is also bullshit, it’s the new dyslexia (as Spectator leaked) for describing low IQ offspring to narcissistic parents who also refused to discipline their brain as babies and toddlers (easy to spot, the baby holding an iPad). You cannot have an attention deficit, that would make you a vegetable, in a COMA. It’s an alternative state of consciousness like anesthesia, which literally winds down your attention to a deficit aka below consciousness (it can be measured by EEG). They literally give the kids amphetamines, club drugs, because a key sign of low IQ in kids is low energy, listlessness, ennui (side effect arrogant atheism), later called “failure to thrive” (as spiteful mutants) since the mutation load doesn’t process for energy in the body effectively. Think about it – they’re only slow, compared to the genetically healthy norm of age peers. Again, their genetic inferiority -compared to the norm population of the parents requires them to take SPEED.

What is the Amphetamine Speed?

“The amphetamine speed is actually a “slang” name for the entire class of drugs known as amphetamines. All amphetamines, whether legal or illegal, activate chemical processes throughout the brain and body and so “speed up” most every bodily function.”

They have degenerated that far down. The drug category of speed. Why would energy level drugs “help” unless the root issue is genetic?

esp when the effects inc.

  • Loss of interest in sex
  • Impotence
  • Restlessness
  • Irritability
  • Agitation

Adderall

Impotence and no libido is great for depopulation efforts. But they want the low IQ to be productive workers for the companies.

But isn’t a supposed symptom of ADHD already the last three?

Yeah, don’t expect logic. Low IQ people often self-medicate with drugs anyway. It’s the dirty little secret of drug addicts. They often lack the full frontal lobe function for impulse control. Making it legal makes them worse, it enables them.

How can we tell it’s genetic? Look for a paternal age effect. All fathers biologically contribute is DNA.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aging-dads-more-likely-to-have-kids-with-autism-adhd-schizophrenia-and-more/

ding ding ding

Researchers examined all births that happened in Sweden between 1973 and 2001, and found a child born to a 45-year-old dad was 25 times more likely to have bipolar disorder, 13 times more likely to have ADHD, 3.5 times more likely to have autism, 2.5 times more likely to exhibit suicidal behavior or a substance abuse problem, and twice as likely to have a psychotic disorder like schizophrenia when compared to kids born to a 24-year-old father.

13x more likely past middle age

13, men have a right to be told this stuff in Sex Ed, family planning is important

and yes paternal is a bigger risk:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/older-dads-may-increase-childs-health-risks-more-than-older-moms/

the real QED? missing link:

https://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20090309/older-fathers-lower-iq-in-kids#1

Children born to older fathers don’t perform as well on tests of thinking skills during infancy and early childhood, while those born to older mothers have higher scores on the same tests, a study shows.

Ouch.

It’s like how single parent fathers also have kids with crap outcomes and test scores. The manosphere is in serious, life-ruining denial. Any single parent is a crap-shoot. Men have a right to know this young, to prepare.

The reason for this discrepancy is simple and evolutionary.

In fathers, early breeding (20s) is a sign he can mature faster than peers and lock down a quality woman earlier. He’s just a better man. Sorry.

Society shouldn’t enable dysgenic men to breed at all, especially in the teens. Also, sorry. But social policy matters here.

Women settle earlier, the lazier they are (dysgenic, r-select) from less discernment, the feminine trait. High IQ women complete education first, before assortative mating with a man in their class and general IQ band (eugenic, K). Child IQ maps most onto maternal IQ, as previously linked about if you search. The mother is the one raising it, don’t choose a bimbo. Also, her DNA having a high mutation load in utero will hamper the kid’s IQ regardless of the father. You’ll note in men with more than one wife, the kids with the wife who settled later are smarter, she’s more feminine and discerning. Women prepare for marriage and kids too. You need a woman who isn’t just a breeding sow. A woman who takes kids seriously and wants them, not a meal ticket. Avoid the Meghans.

McGrath’s team analyzed data from a large study called the U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Project, which recruited pregnant women from 12 sites in the U.S. from 1959 to 1965. The data from this ongoing project has been a “treasure trove” for researchers, McGrath says.

His team looked at more than 33,000 children born between 1959 and 1965 and then looked at their results on cognitive tests administered at ages 8 months, 4 years, and 7 years. The tests evaluated the children’s ability to think and reason, measuring such skills as concentration, learning, speaking, reading, arithmetic, memory, and motor skills such as coordination.

Finally, they looked for links with the father’s age, the mother’s age, and in one analysis also adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as family income and parental education.

The average age of the fathers in the study was 28.4 and ranged from 14 to 66. The mother’s average age was 24.8 and ranged from 12 to 48.

same average as the middle ages

In recent years, according to the paper, it has become very common for couples to delay having children until their late 30s.

They’re falsely told it makes the kids smarter, only in the case of good genetics (and so higher natural IQ), solid education before (no Marxism) and only the woman (who can then raise the kid better). Men constantly regenerate gametes so mutate in a compounding way. Their DNA becomes more mutated with age. Eventually it’ll be seen as child abuse to delay on purpose too long (when you already found the right person and have your health). Women are born with most of our eggs for this reason, to maintain the species. What’s eugenic in a woman is dysgenic in a man, the sexes are opposites! This gives men incentives to improve his tribe. Nature doesn’t hate you, it’s a challenge and men are failing by assuming they’re like women.

The older the father, the more likely the child was to score lower on the tests, except for one measure of motor skills.

When they looked at the mother’s age, however, they found that the older the mother, the higher the children scored on the thinking skills tests. (That finding, reported in earlier studies as well, may be due to a more nurturing home environment if the mother is older, but this study suggests children of older fathers don’t reap the same benefit.)

I love how they try to nurture it away. Nope. It’s biological mainly.

However, when the researchers adjusted for such factors as the parents’ socioeconomic status, including income and education, it modified the effect of both parents’ ages on the intelligence tests. For instance, the average score on the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale was nearly 6 points lower for children born to fathers age 50 compared to those born to fathers age 20. But when the socioeconomic factors were taken into account, the difference dropped to 2.2 points.

Incentives for high IQ men. Only low IQ men complain about fitness tests.

While the study findings may suggest the best combination of parents is an older woman with a younger man, McGrath says it’s too early to make any specific recommendations.

Suuuuure, PC liar. Protect those feels at all costs! Baby-killers.

They don’t mean by much, a few years, but modern men commonly lack any maturity to have a commitment in their twenties. I have noticed a trend of older women (5,10 years) settling with younger men, though. They also seem oddly fertile? The birth rate cult must take serious note of this. Older men regret not freezing their sperm but the egg freezing jokes are misplaced. Gametes degrade vastly faster in men. Sorry, you’re not like women?

If you really care about fixing sub-replacement fertility, look at what the data says is ideal and not your ego.

What’s behind the link between older fathers and lower IQ? “There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the sperm of older dads develop more mutations, that is, spelling mistakes in the DNA code,” McGrath says. His team is researching this idea further in animal studies comparing young mice with older ones.

ding ding ding genetic load

Their train of thought is the same as mine.

They’re avoiding getting this out in case more men take paternity leave they don’t deserve (since men can’t give birth and have nothing to recover from medically). They’ll tiptoe around old guy’s feels about impotence even if it gives their eventual, panic spawn a low IQ and bipolar disorder. Don’t pin your hopes on having grandkids in that case, what a waste.

They don’t wanna get sued, so they won’t tell men how serious this is. Better have no kids than invest in a sickly one and have no grandkids. But Big Pharma doesn’t like that.

We have known about the paternal age effect for many years,” says Harry Fisch, MD, director of the Male Reproductive Center and director of urologic microsurgery at Columbia University Medical Center of New York Presbyterian Hospital. Yet, he says, “We are just starting to scratch the surface.”

Testosterone levels begin to decline slowly at age 30, Fisch says. Ideally, men should father children “sooner rather than later,” he says.

No, supplements aren’t bio-available the way real T is. Your DNA is still being damaged.

“The 20s and early 30s are ideal, but real life intervenes,” he says, making that time frame not feasible due to lack of a partner, difficulty getting pregnant, financial restraints, or a host of other factors.

Fix the economy so high IQ men can settle in their 20s. Stop forcing them to fund the kids of the feckless men.

That’ll sort sub-replacement fertility AND the spiteful mutants won’t bother anyway. People are not genetically equal. Spiteful mutants actually think they can have kids and avoid being a parent. You can’t just hand the kid to the mother 100% and act like a bachelor. Then the kids won’t give you grandkids out of actual spite, as happens to narcissistic parents. Abandonment is abuse, and that includes Don Draper careerism.

In a perspective on the study, published in the same issue of PLoS Medicine, Mary Cannon, MD, of the Royal College of Surgeons in Dublin, Ireland, says it is important to take socioeconomic factors into account when looking at the effect of a father’s age (as well as a mother’s).

IQ predicts SES so no. Shut up, Mary.

Men reap as they sow. They wanted to shirk patriarchy first. The ‘Sexual Revolution’ killed patriarchy in part by making it kill itself. Yes, waste your best sperm jacking it to porn, you’re free. Your sperm will be super potent for autism by the time you figure it out. Wait until they find out all those clubbing STDs make mutations more damaging.

Is it a coincidence the Boomers are the first generational product of ‘free love’? I think not. I have a pet theory the bad type of Boomer’s father picked up STDs during the war from brothels (men were enticed to attend by YKW) and warped their brain development by passing to the mother. The military won’t do that study.

Back to meditation.

The frontal lobe issues “muh concentration, et al.” are low IQ, from their heavy genetic load; the dumbness, the dense quality of them is a symptom of the IQ range. AKA being thick. Attention is filtered by your brain structure and informed by genetics.

from top:

It’s there at that maximum level of focus where you are the smartest you can possibly be. But unfortunately, neither meditation, or anything else, can increase where that limit is.

Denial of humanity is narcissism, denial of human limits. Pure egocentrism, spiritual bypassing for the ritualists.

It’s funny how both groups (New Agers and ADD/ADHD excuse-makers) are often also IQ denialists, while simultaneously wanting to ‘boost’ the thing they claim doesn’t exist? Deny mutation load, bitches. When we can test for it at birth, welcome to Gattaca. IQ tends to predict certain personality traits e.g. laziness, so people would actually be happier. Telling everyone we’re genetically equal makes the stupid miserable. They assume the system is against them, actually their parents.

Many relaxation symptoms of meditation rituals are just coping with a coffee addiction, mostly Starbucks, which they never drop. They love Starbucks more than any God. The breathing exercise kind isn’t meditation. It’s most commonly fighting a histamine, pesticide, GMO and/or mycotoxin response from a bad diet and sleep pattern. It’s suppressing your immune system from healing the damage. Like mega-dosing antioxidants means those free radicals can’t kill the cancer in you – so the cancer kills you. Stop trying to fix your biology, the train is fine.

They never mention that parietal/frontal issue but cranial space is at a premium, when one part grows, another is damaged and atrophies. When a person is stressed, they must address the causes in their life, rather than hoping for some genie to wing it for them. Opening your mind up invites all sorts of trauma and bad karma in, like opening your front door and leaving it unguarded overnight. Guard your heart, your mind and your soul. Cynically, the New Age people probably know what they’re doing, and they’re injuring the competition. Do not assume their sincerity. Most New Agers are deeply intellectually dishonest and they rip one another off all the time. A person who believes in moral absolutes and karma would never! Avoid the communal narcissists who are basically cult leaders. In another time they’d be leading witch trials for a girl who rejected them. If their object is material, that’s an abuse of the spiritual. Look at the vice in their personal life, where it cannot hide. Drink, drug, debauchery problems? They help no one, they are Will O Wisps guiding you to your own destruction. Siren songs are not a myth. They constantly travel, to hide from themselves? They seem weirdly lonely and depressed when not distracted by travel? Don’t take their life advice, they cannot be happy. The particular reasons for them don’t matter. Don’t let it be your problem. Spiteful mutants are nomads. They cannot settle – in a job, in a country, by marriage. They’ll search until they die.

Meditation amplifies your emotion, the way it’s packaged now to rich people will be interesting as they lose their fortunes. Especially Boomers, with no time to recoup or ability to compete in the Brave New Multicultural World they generally voted to import in. Sorry Boomer, you’re too white and male to be manager this time! Here’s your AA boss.

They haven’t tried it from a state of loss and deprivation, but a bubble of delusion and “I deserve this”. Meditating from any bad place, as a ritual, is like the surest way to become suicidal. New Agers know but never talk about this. If you ask around, people know this commonly but the topic gets banned or taken down. It’s ritualised rumination. Rumination is actively bad for your health (unless your health is already bad and you mistake normal for good).

That’s a cult indicator, forbidden bad experience discussion, it puts off new recruits.

They prefer to shame people for bad results, like that’s the first person it ever happened to.

(There’s drug abuse purging from the body years after the fact, a common cause of sudden health problems and ‘depression’ or ‘anxiety’ in celebrities. It takes years for drugs to fully leave all the organs. Who cares?)

Aging fathers, ugly kids

That’s one solid explanation for why people are generally uglier nowadays, even the healthy weight.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311035

Paternal age negatively predicts offspring physical attractiveness in two, large, nationally representative datasets

Freeze your sperm at 18 for optimum freshness.

Effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness is investigated in two datasets.

Various covariates are utilized.

Significant negative effects are found in both datasets.

Effects are independent of birth order.

Findings consistent with paternal age as a source of new mutations in offspring.

Abstract

The effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness has recently been investigated. Negative effects are predicted as paternal age is a strong proxy for the numbers of common de novo mutations found in the genomes of offspring. As an indicator of underlying genetic quality or fitness, offspring attractiveness should decrease as paternal age increases, evidencing the fitness-reducing effects of these mutations.

That’s a hard rectal red pill.

I’m sure the manosphere will try its hardest to ignore like the dead and defective babies.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

The problem is, you think you have time.

Thus far results are mixed, with one study finding the predicted effect, and a second smaller study finding the opposite. Here the effect is investigated using two large and representative datasets (Add Health and NCDS),

holy Jesus a sound method

I almost fell off my high horse

both of which contain data on physical attractiveness and paternal age.

Validity! Validity! My queendom for some statistical validity!

The effect is present in both datasets, even after controlling for maternal age at subject’s birth, age of offspring, sex, race, parental and offspring (in the case of Add Health) socio-economic characteristics, parental age at first marriage (in the case of Add Health) and birth order.

The confound control is practically orgasmic, I can’t wait to see how they mansplain this one away.

That is perfect method. But it triggers butthurts and their precious feefees are hurt by the mere implication that degenerate older dads are bad for their kid’s health. Because all those upper crust respectable 1950s dads were like “60 is the new 20 lol!” Who gives a shit if your kids need you past high school? You got more priceless clubbing times you don’t remember, that’s what really matters. Not seeing your grandkids.

Class, race, sex, age at marriage, birth order, maternal age, offspring age – there’s literally nothing else to control for. Nothing. It’s flawless.

THESE. ARE. THE. STUDIES. WE. NEED.

Logically, since women are born with most of their eggs, there wouldn’t be a maternal effect. It isn’t constantly replenishing like the male gamete. Cell division’s a bitch. Male lifestyle for all his years prior

https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/dads-smoking-before-conception-harms-kids/

affects the child at conception (and even which sperm is conceived) far more than the details of pregnancy (minus pollutants it’s pretty much the same as in ancient times, the womb is not a new environment).

Maybe add child health although those studies already exist to cross-reference with attractiveness?

As in, are the girls more womanly as adults in WHR and the boys have more manly frames (broad shoulders, narrow waist, which should be a metric of its own)? Or less gender typical? Even androgynous, or fully gender-atypical?

Do younger or older fathers produce better-looking kids in the gendered sense?

[We can tell by looking at old photos but let’s pretend.]

Give me a time machine, please. The ugly wigger types hurt my eyes.

[I have also noted mannish looking sisters tend to be the older, “ugly” sister of two -coughs Beatrice- and the girly looking brothers tend to be the younger, usually gay one. Cannot unsee.]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682

e.g.

“In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.”

The beard can also be a sign of poor grade genes e.g. savages, wolf man. Overall bone structure uber alles.

Maybe factor in sexual activity of the father prior to conception? Especially partner count and STDs. STDs are known to harm attractiveness in the host [coughs David Beckham, most of Hollywood] so why not the offspring’s?

Back to the top study:

The apparent robustness of the effect to different operationalizations of attractiveness suggests high generalizability, however the results must be interpreted with caution, as controls for parental levels of attractiveness were indirect only in the present study.

aka please don’t sue us but you know it’s true

But you can wait forever because the Jews said so!

Say, who owns all the biotech and IVF companies?

https://www.fertilitybridge.com/blog/2018/4/11/battleforivfmarketwallstreetvsprivatepractice

[chuckles in Israel shekels]

https://hmcisrael.com/specialty/ivf-israel/

“According to statistics, around 20% of couples wishing to conceive are faced with certain obstacles that inhibit a successful pregnancy.

Fertility Treatment is one of the most prioritized fields of medicine in Israel.”

Sure, you can wait for decades! Also, cut the kid when they’re born!

We need more future little Viagra users.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/2648044

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7752-female-genital-mutilation-can-cause-infertility/

Does Circumcision Decrease the Fertility of Sperm in the Male?

“However, birth rates are much higher in countries where the men are predominantly uncircumcised.”

There is no question that an uncircumcised man has a cooler penis than a circumcised man in the flaccid state. For some reason, removal of the foreskin is the reason for this. There seems to be some sort of temperature sensor in the foreskin that may control penile temperature. Removing the foreskin gets rid of this sensor.

It only takes a few temperature degrees of difference to damage sperm. As the penis is in close proximity to the testicles, it’s quite likely that a cooler penis would help keep the testicles cooler (Remember that men are more potent in the colder months of the year). Under these condition, if the testicles got too cold, they can always be retracted closer to the body.

Almost like God gave men a prepuce solely for this evolutionary function in reproduction.

…Now consider this: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have the same penis temperature on full erection, as we stated earlier in this article. So, clearly, there is a specific reason why a natural-uncircumcised penis remains at a cooler temperature during the flaccid state. When the penis is erect it is no longer in close proximity with the testicles, so penile temperature should not affect the testicular temperature at this phase (be the penis circumcised or uncircumcised).

Upon orgasm, the penis tends to retract more into the pelvis (at least with my experience). Due to the friction and increased blood flow that occurred during the sexual act, it makes sense that the penis will have an increase in temperature in a flaccid state post-sex than in a flaccid state previous to the sexual act. Could this retraction be another mechanism for the “heated” penis to steer clear of the testicles?

Go there, science.

Circumcision and Male Fertility: Is There a Link?

Scientists have recently concluded that circumcision can help with infertility in males suffering from two very specific diseases.

So… not generalizable.

Some woman perv studies after all that penis talk.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000269

Women’s faces and voices may be cues to their reproductive potential. If so, then individual differences in indices of female fecundity and residual reproductive value, such as hormonal profiles, body composition, and age, should be associated with women’s facial and vocal attractiveness to men. However, previous research on these associations is sparse, has rendered mixed results, and is limited to Western samples. The current study therefore explored relationships between correlates of reproductive capability (testosterone levels, age, and body mass index [BMI]) and facial and vocal attractiveness in women from industrial and foraging societies. Women’s facial and vocal attractiveness was associated with each of these indicators in at least one of the two samples. The patterns of these associations suggest that women’s faces and voices provide cues to both common and unique components of reproductive potential and help explain the evolution of men’s mating preferences.

Lesson: Avoid the manjaw.

Women change their vocal pitch all the time though. European women are taught to make it lower at school (speak up = louder, lower pitch), Asians try to make it higher. The key is how they sound when hysterically upset. That’s their true level. Europeans go up, Asians down.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000475

Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history—number of children and pregnancies—in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not.

So partnered, married women. Not single ones.

Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features—facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.

Menopause is not the face equalizer you think.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816302318

African and European perception of African female attractiveness

Dare you to do the same study with every race judging every other.

Majority of research on attractiveness is restricted to faces of European origin. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across communities due to variations in both facial morphology and local standards of beauty. We investigated the relative contribution of four facial markers of attractiveness based on 101 female facial portraits (standardized, non-manipulated) from Cameroon and Namibia, which were assessed by local male raters and by raters from a distant European population, the Czech Republic. Images from Cameroon include only women of Bantu origin, while Namibians are represented by women of both Bantu (Owambo/Herero) and Nama origin. While controlling for age and BMI, we explored the relationship between female attractiveness and a set of facial traits: fluctuating asymmetry, averageness, shape sexual dimorphism, and skin color (rated and measured in CIELab color space).

In the Cameroonian sample, local male raters favored lighter-skinned female faces with morphology closer to average. The attractiveness of Nama women as rated by Nama men positively correlated with lighter complexion, but this did not extend to rating by Cameroonian men. The attractiveness of Namibian Owambo/Herero women was positively associated with facial femininity and lighter complexion when judged by both Cameroonian and Nama male raters. In all samples, the attractiveness as rated by Czech men was predicted by age and BMI, but not by skin color. We found no significant association between attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry in any of the tested samples. When controlling for age, the effect of skin color on attractiveness turned to be non-significant in the Owambo/Herrero and Nama sample, but remained significant in the Cameroonian sample. Variations in skin color thus represent an important factor of African female attractiveness within the African context, but they do not seem to affect judgements made by European raters.

They don’t want any of them.

Sensitivity to some facial markers of female attractiveness thus seems to be restricted to regional populations and/or constrained by shared ethnicity.

Paler women have more oestrogen. So duh.

Women reject old guys who’d give them dead or ugly kids:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816301283

“This finding is consistent with men’s stated preference for young, fertile women in mating and suggests that the typical pattern is generated by women’s limiting role in mating.”

aka their gender role

“older men tend to marry older women, including those who are peri- and post-menopausal”

TIL Korea is so degenerate it has slave markets. Ooof.

So much for the myth that young women have the hots for them. Yeah, I’m sure the Jap schoolgirl came onto you, right perv?

Deadbeats are the end of the West:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816303671

Research in evolutionary psychology, and life history theory in particular, has yielded important insights into the developmental processes that underpin variation in growth, psychological functioning, and behavioral outcomes across individuals. Yet, there are methodological concerns that limit the ability to draw causal inferences about human development and psychological functioning within a life history framework. The current study used a simulation-based modeling approach to estimate the degree of genetic confounding in tests of a well-researched life history hypothesis: that father absence (X) is associated with earlier age at menarche (Y). The results demonstrate that the genetic correlation between X and Y can confound the phenotypic association between the two variables, even if the genetic correlation is small—suggesting that failure to control for the genetic correlation between X and Y could produce a spurious phenotypic correlation. We discuss the implications of these results for research on human life history, and highlight the utility of incorporating genetically sensitive tests into future life history research.

I don’t think debtor’s prisons will come back – but if you breed it, you should feed it. I think the abandoned women that existed since Biblical times will just hire bounty hunters to shoot the first family deserter for a share of his life insurance policy.

Patriarchs everywhere would rejoice at culling the cads. The women get a widow’s pension.

Everyone wins. Hey, you said “until death do us part”. Men used to die by their oaths.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381400052X

I have noticed that immigrant men have a higher pitch than their non-immigrant relatives.

Maybe the act of immigration impairs masculinity?

Low male voice pitch may communicate potential benefits for offspring in the form of heritable health and/or dominance, whereas access to resources may be indicated by correlates of socioeconomic status, such as sociolinguistic features. Here, we examine if voice pitch and social dialect influence women’s perceptions of men’s socioeconomic status and attractiveness. In Study 1, women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices.

A lot of PUAs get shot down for 1. being brown and feeling entitled to a white woman, the lowest miscegenation group also further sickened by repeated forced “refugee” interactions and 2. having a high pitch voice and effete face compared to their national relatives. Compare within the white race, the “Latin lover” in Italy versus Italian immigrants raised and living in London, who sound like cartoon chipmunks by comparison.

Yes, we notice.

No, you can’t change it. We notice.

Same applies to white men who moved South so it appears to be immigration. Either being an immigrant or the act itself makes a man less manly. Most obviously, torso body fat deposition like a woman of their group and the sisters become like the men at home, more athletic.

In Study 2, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness.

It isn’t the money, it’s the genes.

Good genes, good brains, good money. Fixating on the money is what ugly guys do – Muslim prince to Jewish media mogul.

We also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men’s voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status.

Capacity to protect. Not a desk jockey. The middle-class is effeminate. They want army. No cowards.

Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status.

Women know quality, really? Almost like our lives depend on it.

Finally, women’s own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch.

Plenty of men chose to marry down to get a looker out of their genetic league, hypergamy.

Erotic capital is worth it, as you can tell by the fertility study above, even post-menopausal they’re better-looking.

Hence, women’s preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women’s preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch.

Women…. making…. mate choices?

mutation load is important?

 

Brain size of males by race

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/brain-size-race-and-iq/

includes this

The third piece of evidence is that the racial gaps have existed for a long time. In fact, based on the data from the tables above, the White/Black brain size gap doesn’t seem to have gotten any smaller during the 20th century.

Long before your 60s immigration acts.

The first thing to note is that brain size in the general population has a heritability of 87%. Thus, almost all the differences between individuals in brain size are caused by genes.

Secondly, we should note that racial brain size differences are present at, and even before, birth.

Keep blaming women though, that’ll help.

We need more direct studies like this. Gestation length and other variables must be accounted.

Menarche and other variables like WHR vary by race in the women too. More studies! MORE!

The manosphere is based on a myth of equalism, it was destined to fail.

Fourthly, racial brain size differences have been found all around the world. For instance, the Beals and Smith data set previously referred to features skulls from over 100 populations world wide. Many of the autopsy studies previously cited were done in East Asia, as were two of the MRI studies. This makes any gene independent cultural explanation less likely.

Fifthly, several studies have shown that mulattoes have an average brain size in between that of Blacks and Whites (Pearl, 1934Bean, 1906). This finding has been established on multiple occasions and is what a hereditarian hypothesis would predict since mulattoes are half White and half Black genetically speaking.

Do studies for other mixes.

Sixth, many traits which tend to co-evolve with larger brains also differ racially in a way that mirrors the body size adjusted brain size patternRushton and Rushton (2003) looked at 37 anatomical features which 3 textbooks on human evolution identified as tending to co-evolve in the hominid line with larger brains. For instance, larger pelvic size tends to co-evolve with brain size so that mothers can give birth to larger brained infants.  Rushton then utilized 5 forensic anthropology textbooks to look at racial differences in these traits. These traits followed the East Asian>White>Black pattern in 25 out of 31 cases. The probability of this happening at random is .000000001.

WHR is important.

Follow the tag, there are racial differences in studies.

And East-Asian isn’t a race, at best it’s a sub-group, do more studies. Properly.
Asians fail more often on IVF, also posted about that.

Similarly, Rushton (2004) showed that, across 234 mammalian species, brain size correlates with longevity, gestation time, birth weight, litter size, age of first mating, body weight, and body length. Various studies have shown that each of these variables also differ between the races in a way that, based on what we find across the animal kingdom, would predict the body size corrected brain size differences we observe (Rushton, 1995Templer 2006Rushton and Templer, 2009;).

Longevity – must look at averages e.g. not Danes for all whites nor Japs for all Asians.
Gestation – we know this varies.
Weight – control confounds.
Litter size – look at natural rate of twinning.
Virginity loss is r-select, do not want.
Body weight – vague.
Length – we already know racial height. Still, add to the rest, I guess.

Thus, we have six lines of evidence all of which would be predicted by a hereditarian view on racial differences in brain size. While each line of evidence on its own may not be compelling, the combination of all six seems to strongly imply that racial brain size gaps are partly heritable.

It is worth noting that the racial brain size gaps are probably not entirely attributable to genes. Some authors, including Richard Nisbett, have plausibly argued that nutrition also plays a role. However, there explanations are not mutually exclusive, no environmental variables has been shown to account for the majority of the gap, and,  as we have seen, there are many separate lines of evidence indicating that genes also play a role

A confound, in weight.

I suggest seafood consumption.

There is good evidence that the races evolved different brain sizes in response to climate. Specifically, various studies have found that a population’s brain size correlates with climate related variables. For instance, Pearce and Dunbar (2011) ‘s data set produces a correlation of .74 between a population’s brain size and its latitude. Similarly, Ash and Gallup (2007) found a correlation of .48 between the size of 109 fossilized human skulls and the latitude at which they were found. Further still, Bailey and Geary (2009) analyzed 175 skulls ranging in age from 10,000 years old to 1.9 million years old and found a correlation of -.41 between brain size and winter temperature and -.61 between size and latitude (larger brains were found in areas more distant from the equator).

How dare you use science.

The weebs might reee!

Lynn (2015) used Smith and Beals data set of 20,000 skulls from 122 populations to estimate that roughly 30% of the African-European IQ gap can be statistically accounted for by brain size differences. By contrast, brain size differences would actually predict an Asian-European IQ gap 35% larger than the one that actually exists. Thus, brain size is probably one of many factors, both biological and environmental, which account for racial intelligence differences.

Can ya rig the test?

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/intelligence-and-corruption/

Easy, who’s the most innovative?

Especially before colonialism spreading info. Right?

You can rig IQ tests and college transcripts, not more advanced farming equipment when the other group invented it centuries prior.