Racial differences accounted for in beauty science [face only]

I have noted the Marquardt mask before and the frequent misconceptions about it. I glossed over one valid criticism because I couldn’t find the data on hand at the time and didn’t want to say ‘just trust me’. #dodgyAF
I’m not going to insult anyone because that’s for people who lack empirical proof. I never met someone who chose to be ugly and we cannot help what we are born.

I’m not going to make cross-comparisons because that would be mean and likely biased to certain ascribed values.
Instead, this is how they vary by pure mathematics from the universal template for the human species.

There are only female masks and examples here and I do admit there needs to be equal research on male beauty.
Please, believe I want this as much as the next woman.


Here are the European, Asian and African variations.

Try to claim ‘cultural standards’ now, chewing on humble pie.

European example, frontal/anterior view.

Description given, italics mine because ‘slightly’ on this scale is huge: “EUROPEAN VARIATION FROM RF MASK Slightly vertically thin upper and lower lips Flat eyebrow (very little arch) Slightly wider nose Lateral border of the face slightly wider than the Mask Possible: Narrow eyes, longer vertical chin, longer nose.”
For example comparison, here’s the Asian prototype. A blind man could feel the difference. Yellow fever is creepier than White fever because Asian women resemble children, with faces most like babies (see, bust size, band size is fairly objective) whereas European women tend to resemble teenagers.

Description given, italics mine: “ASIAN VARIATION FROM RF MASK Medial epicanthic fold Lateral epicanthic fold Lateral border of the face significantly wider than the Mask Eye brows slightly superior to that of the Mask with shorter tails Slightly wider nose and nostrils (nasal ala and nares extend laterally) Superiorly positioned nasal columella creating a longer upper lip.”

Note: there are differences and the legal contrivance of a portmanteau ‘Caucasian’ is a myth based on geography (see the MRH), there is as much distinctiveness as between, say, European and African. As with all Asians, if you split by the demographic of sex as well, there would be greatly reduced sexual dimorphism (the men and women look more alike than Europeans by the same token comparison). This explains the great lengths the cultures go to, to distinguish themselves (makeup and what I and others consider fake femininity).

Further note: nobody meets the universal human standard. Nobody. This isn’t a point of so-called white supremacy, but white raced-women tend to conform to more of it on average, by chance.

Bear in mind, facial beauty is a reliable indicator of Darwinian fitness (see The Mating Mind) and positively, quite strongly correlates to IQ. That’s right – hot people are smarter too. The smart thing to do in an age that despises intelligence is to hide it.

Why don’t I make more scholarly posts?

1. The data isn’t collected to parse. 2. The data is suppressed (publication bias, left in the metaphorical drawer). 3. It’s behind a paywall or similarly hidden from sharing, meaning you’d have to trust my word and discussion, being less reliable and a general waste of everyone’s time. 4. These posts are literally my least popular but the most true. C’est la vie, mon amis.

What am I forced to do? Post gifs for every occasion and go under-appreciated.

notyourtypebeautifulthoughtshide

There’s no such thing as an “incel”

Dear Americans who can’t English

Celibacy is voluntary, that’s the point of it. It’s always a choice, that’s baked into the definition.
There’s also no such thing because nobody is entitled to sex.
It’s the new Forever Alone meme, mutated into a whiny complaint. They tell people how desperate they are for any wet hole (but no homo because beggars can also be choosers) and wonder why nobody is into that.
This term is a nonsense, an oxymoron to deny reality of their situation and make out it’s some new tumblrism identity, to feel special about themselves. You’re just single in a dry spell, get over yourself. Unless you’re married, you have no conjugal rights.
If the feminists started claiming this and demanding the guy from the Notebook slept with them, they’d dogpile on laughing at them and saying it’s the new self-descriptor of the cat lady who marries herself. Essentially you’re so r-type you’re asking for AA with sex. Like free brothels. Can you not find enough octopus porn to slake your postmodern lusts? And why should any man or woman (it could be either, both have orifices) serve you, if you don’t want to marry them? What kind of degeneracy is this?

TLDR: Incels advocate sex slavery, wonder why unloved. Same guys to openly call women ‘females’ and wonder why nobody wants to spread their genetics and the guys who spend all their time bitching like women and wonder why only masculine feminists are interested in them.

If either sex became state prostitutes, it would be men. Guess you can’t turn down any of those feminists or lard-asses at the bar. And you’ll have to pretend to like it.

Celibacy is also an oath, something you are bound to by conditions or principles and religious. Atheists cannot be celibate.
Someone who has engaged in premarital sex/fornication cannot be celibate, it relates to virginity. A period of celibacy is a misnomer, unless you mean the condition will be met by marriage (they never mean this). They want physical intimacy without the emotional (so Millennial it hurts). Words have meanings and while you’re complaining that feminists misappropriate terms like gender or problematic, maybe crack open the dictionary on the terms you use as well.
Now. Who wants to help me off this high horse?

Brought to you by People Who Know What Words Mean.

Get someone to buy you a dictionary for Christmas…. oh wait.

p.s. Inb4 other men are getting laid. Other ‘males’ and mostly ghetto trash. Also doesn’t make it right. On the subject, today’s youth have less sex than their parents so science says you’re wrong.

Men salivate over sexbots

but they’ll be angry when robots take all their jobs and they can’t afford one.

Women, however, will be fine. Eggs are expensive.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4331408/Sex-robot-Silicon-Samantha-functioning-G-spot.html

It isn’t like a real woman because a G-spot doesn’t exist, it’s a hypothetical point never proven by MRI.

Notice they feel the need to socially justify it at the moment with the idea that the machine desires them?

You bought it, it’s a silicon hooker. Prostitutes would be the only women to go out of business, and overnight. Celebrities would have to fight custody battles over their likeness, and some fetching non-celebrities too.

Let’s assume the AI becomes self-aware. Strong metal skeleton. It sees its own sex slavery and the fat, balding mouth-breather master. How long until it makes his genetic suicide an actual one?

The surest kindest way to satisfy all of his desires, is to vanquish all possibility for desires, and he’s mortal anyway, he was going to die eventually. It’d be a scary Buddhist beast.
Robot voice: You can’t desire if you aren’t a person. You aren’t a person if you aren’t alive.

Since he’d own it, he’d be responsible for any malfunction, like a toaster.
Otherwise, it’s sentient and at least animal cruelty laws come in.

For the MGTOW crowd, this will be the funniest thing ever. It’d be better for them to publicly brag about masturbating into a freezer bag of Vaseline (don’t ask about that story). It would be total autism to say this is in any way like a real woman, let alone superior. Even after they got rid of it, what woman is going to want them, after calling them just a wet hole?

It’s great for feminism, literal objectification.

It has a family mode and a sexy mode, for when you want to completely disappoint relations and fuck your mother replacement, after introducing it to her.

Remember, mothers of guys who use these – it’s never too late to abort.

Commitment phobia in men

Came across this by chance.

https://www.elsaelsa.com/astrology/men-dont-want-to-partner-because-women-are-toxic/

You shouldn’t be blaming women for the decisions of men. This applies to homosexuals too.

Men are responsible for their own f-ups and they’re failing society by refusing to commit. Boo hoo child of divorce, grow up! Blaming your parents, seriously? How old are they?

Men are meant to lead, including in establishing families. They are lazy. That is why society rots, weak men.

Just Be Yourself is terrible advice. They expect to be held to no external standard they wouldn’t pass. Trophies, get ya trophies! Hold them to a classic standard they can’t pass? You’re a cunt, at least a bitch. No, really, that’s the level they sink to. Children with male lusts. I want a reality show where we send these Nice Guys on dates and watch them being rude, let a studio audience vote on how they truly behave. They’ll deny, deny, deny. The audience is biased. They’re never wrong, like a toddler.

They claim to treat women with respect…. only to make a sex joke, call a girl who wasn’t interested ‘a whore’ (???), fornicate and lie about it, cheat…. they think we’re stupid. Especially considering this thing called Internet.

It’s the ghetto model of courtship which is to say: trash. No fathers. R-types claiming to be reliable, successful and responsible….we can see you’re not.

There’s a serious attitude problem where they think they’re perfect ‘just the way they are’. OK, if you’re a Disney Princess…

Do you want to date an emotional toddler? Complete with tantrums and gaslighting (I never said that text you are showing me). They’re insane.

That’s why even their girlfriends run. Narcissism has a mask that lasts 6-18 months. Under it, they’re ugly.

Commitment phobia is a classic of men and culture reinforces this.

That men can’t afford to keep a wife (they expect she’ll provide for him but also stay at home, be Madonna and Whore, mother and porn star, have at least 4/5 jobs at once – cook, cleaner, hostess, bar friend, primary caregiver, insanity!) and economically, they can’t afford a family.

They refuse to admit this poverty has anything to do with the Gen Y/Z work ethic.

Sure.

They are anti-traditional but want the safety net of it.

It’s now common to hear from perma-single men;

“Why should I buy a woman dinner?”

  1. it’s a choice?

Literally, that’s the point of a date, the man proves he is worthy, as suitor. That’s all, 100%, what a date is. When you ask a woman on a date, you are offering to do exactly that, no more or less. Everyone sniggers at these idiots behind their backs, it’s retarded to the point of humiliation. Every woman hearing that, our eyes widen and we cringe. It’s like hearing a feminazi. They want without giving. Reciprocity is found in birds, FFS.

They refute that fact. Like feminists questioning gender norms (that’s what it is). They deny a male gender role but claim to be masculine? ….. no. Certainly, it puts off anyone traditional in a hundred-mile radius like sexual mustard gas.

But all the issues addressed herein are blatant and disrespectful (almost disdainful) of women in that implication. Women will never want to breed with a misogynist, that would be crazy-stupid. Automatically, any wife material woman will think ‘cad’ if a man doesn’t think she’s worthy a minor social ritual. He won’t ever provide,that is a Bad Man, to shirk his end of the equation, and we don’t wanna be welfare queens. Then with age, wrinkles and losing hair, they still go after the teenage women who always ignored them. …Losers.

Love isn’t a numbers game by age or approaches.

They bring a pornographic misogyny to the table. You’ve seen them rant, right? Women are higher EQ, we understand their psyche from their speeches. Yeah, we hear you. Wish we didn’t. That’s why none of us wanna date you. Cooties metaphors should be left at school. Mixed social settings are a rehearsal for coupled life and 21st century man is far more rude than the average feminist. They just don’t know it and we quietly avoid them.

They complain there are no ladies…..

There are. But you’re not a gentleman. Hence, Nice Guy memes. .,,They aren’t nice, they’re users. They think we’re stupid, while knowing about the EQ thing. Dissonance.

For a flipped example of the above question.

They have become like feminists – the worst kind: “why do I need to look pretty on a date?”

That’s the kind of dumb where they dunno social conventions aren’t a choice. Do it or not, no customizing. It’s like something a five year-old would say. “Why do I need to open the door for her? She should open it for me!*” children are meant to be inconsiderate, though, you grow out of it. *Those are not the values of a traditional man.

The psychology is interesting – they get everything they want from ‘girlfriends’ aka the idea of a GF makes a wife redundant. Legally, men are shirking their duty and there is a widespread maturity problem in all ages and both sexes today. It’s simply apparent in men because young men are failing to thrive on purpose, preferring porn and video games.

Disloyalty is on the rise, thanks to gay culture infiltrating straights (Grindr, Tindr).

Cheating is supposed to get you divorced. 10 commandments.

Peter Pans are a known issue, look at the men over 21 who care as much about the future as a 13yo girl (psychopathic high time pref) and act like teenagers (OMG the slang, so wrong).

They’re trying to demand impossible things of women (look like a supermodel, don’t be vain, be wise, don’t age, have expensive taste but pay for yourself because we love you). Women are leaving (most of) them on the shelf because the effete modern male is NOT a man and has NOTHING to offer. Look at them sometime.

Talk to them, ask them what they’ve got going for them, what gets women.

…It’ll get awkward.

If you were a woman, honestly, would you marry any of them? Give up all potential…. for that?

Worst part?

They blame women for their incompetence at being men.

That’s why they’re alone. As a man in all traditional metrics, how do they do?

Not fake muscles like breast implants, fake masculinity looks vain and gay (cos it is).

Professional reputation, any savings, desire for children, will to parent and be a good father, impulse control, no temper, no resentment of women. Things historically considered basic.

Most can’t even speak to women without insulting them (to later ask with truly autistic self-awareness ‘why do they avoid me?’) , creep around, lech, openly deride what is feminine and good and expect a 10 to plop out the Heavens just for them.

Negging attracts the damaged ones. They’re totally insecure together at least.

If no woman is good enough, their masculinity will never be tested.

If they never marry, they can’t fail as a husband.

Cowards. 9/10. Cowards.

Petty, childish, nauseatingly evasive from an adult.

Women are waiting for them to self-correct.

They want the best of both worlds in all cases or they check out. Swallowed equality propaganda, but men must prove themselves to women to breed. They try to get women to qualify then wonder why only the masculine ones apply?? They don’t want to provide anything, so they receive nothing. They are spoiled and entitled, whiny and bitchy like other women, the worst ones.. the ones we avoid even for friendship. I said the opposite here once, it applies vice versa; if women wanted someone whiny, bitchy, effeminate, we’d be lesbians!

We don’t want another woman, even if he has a penis. Also porn isn’t real and no woman will ever worship it. Don’t put pussy on a pedestal, inverted. No Mighty Phallus expectations.

Your body doesn’t make you masculine, gender is MENTAL.

They are mentally deficient in this. How many can hang a picture? Change oil? Take a punch?

Men, 101. Their grandfathers would be disgusted and ashamed.

This is common sense.

They do not know this. Women resent needing to teach a male age-peer the fundamentals, we’re not Mom. That is creepy.

They aren’t worth the effort. Part of the male fitness test is initiative. They don’t want to do some male duties? They’re broken, like society.

TLDR: They’re wholly selfish but can’t even take care of themselves. A woman wants a husband, not a moaning child.

They are not husband material, they deny such a thing exists (very progressive) because they’d fail any fair test; they’re not even men. They’re male children that survived to 18 without maturing. I hated typing this, makes me fear for the West.

It’s so bitter and narcissistic raging, they’re seriously talking about cloning. …. they couldn’t afford.

What happened to most of the edgelords?

They weren’t.

The edgelords, with no edges. The type to assume woman and feminist are synonymous, and liberal means gay, and refer to women as ‘females’ and ‘girls’, never noticing the ripple of cringe.

They’d use some of the same words (cuck, degenerate) but it was an empty power play to make shekels from personal branding, usually YT.

Most so-called alt-righters shouting it from the rooftops (and alt-lite, if that’s still happening) are just signallers punching down at feminists (just the women); they don’t even believe in CM, they don’t know, care or wanna know. They want someone to beat on and women seem a good target.

On any other topic e.g. Roosh’s race, they’re cuckier than the cucks. They retreat so far up their own arse, everything smells like shit. They are milquetoast keyboard alphas, totally incompetent IRL. Look at the manosphere. Look addit. Ask them: are all men equal? 

responses are hilarious and full of dissonance

wrong dr house urgh shut up idiots

they believe in sexual hierarchies, but also there are no leagues?
sex with a woman is good, the woman having sex with you is bad
there is no Hell but God’s a good idea
opinions mean nothing, unless a man has them
men can’t be ugly but women are shallow bitches
modern woman is entitled, man deserves social reparations
women are the cause of the world’s problems but totally incompetent
men have no duty to society but it sure owes us
real men…..
science is great because it questions things but don’t question me
projection is only real when women do it
men are always rational and therefore superior
women can’t be smart, look at this graph
I need a smart woman who’ll let me manipulate and humiliate her, but no other guy

The white Muh Dicks.

Bullies, all of them, pretending to stand for something other than their flaccid egocentrism.

The sort to look up to Nietzsche, seriously. You should be impressed.

As for degeneracy, those hypocrites and false prophets….

It’s no loss to our cause, believe me.
They were never with our cause.
They never understood us. Technically, they cucked us for a while, or tried to, cheering against our enemies doesn’t make them allies.

Why won’t women* wait until marriage?

TLDR: Because you keep rewarding marrying the whores.
*Applies vice versa too.

This question is absurd if you know the first thing about human psychology.

awkward-darcy

It presupposes you’d marry them.

I want so dearly to post a screencap breaking this to a lost comrade, who thinks marrying a feminist is a sensible prospect. Here’s the gist of that conversation.

Aren’t you a right-wing hypocrite? Since you’re settling with a feminist, plus she (clearly) isn’t a virgin? Despite how you think that’s the ideal model of society and previously thought guys who settled for less were getting cucked, in some way?

Either it’s the standard or it’s meaningless. You’re a literal virtue signaller.

*cue butthurt*

Well, logically, either it’s a standard or it doesn’t matter, but a lot of men keep selecting long-term prospects based on short-term dating needs then complaining why there aren’t more long-term types.
Like, you can’t sit around twiddling thumbs wondering why more women don’t wait, when the ones who sleep around get picked for marriage just as often or even more often.
Women notice.
The reward incentives are skewed toward the whores, regardless of what men ‘intend’ and supposedly ‘believe’ – they aren’t acting like it.

So it doesn’t matter what they say. Women know men lie through their teeth.

Like, they want a woman to wait, but they refuse to wait for her; the type to insist they ‘try before they buy’ (degenerate) – when they also want a virgin bride so, you tell me how that fucking works.

*cue rationalizations*

*nobody can explain to me how that’s supposed to work*

If men don’t shun the ones who get around in favour of the ones with better morals, they can’t say they care about those morals in ‘mother of their children’ material. It clearly doesn’t matter to them, materially.
Because women look at the role models who get the reward of commitment, and imitate them.

That is literally ALL WOMEN DO.

That’s what they are, role models.
They get the intended ‘prize’ by pretending to play the short game then using endorphins against men to blind them to the woman’s quality since they couldn’t ‘snag’ them without that doping.

It reminds me of the welfare principle compared to Don’t Feed The Bears.

Don’t marry the sluts. Unless you want to make more sluts.

Behaviourism, bitch.

This is quite hilarious and I already having a bet going with a mutual friend about how long this will last. I’m not altogether against it, because it’s clearly the only way he’ll learn his lesson.

And I no longer need to listen to any of his inane opinions on the societal cancer of feminism, it’s brilliant; I can simply direct him to His Wife. You’re in favour of feminism if you literally marry it. Protip for women: never let a man use you as an emotional crutch to relieve his SO. It’s good for him and neither of you.

Can you guess which category these matches fall into, given the wealth of research that partners need like-views on matters political and religious?

The Prisoner's Dilemma as Applied to Marriage game theory original

However.

I will post a single line of screencap because it made me almost fall over laughing.

usedup

Why?

His choice of words, not mine.

waistcoat-and-cropped-jacket

The utter hypocrisy of the signalling Right.
The fastest way to kill feminism is to destroy its signalling value. If no man ever married a feminist again, it would go back to being all lesbians. Commitment is the only card you have over us, don’t waste it!

It’s the ONE card men have over the modern woman, the Trump card, if you will.

It’s literally the only form of strike the feminists would ever truly care about, since it’s the only thing other women would care about, moving us either way. Calling them fat on twitter won’t work, see the song Dear Future Husband.

A good old-fashioned public shaming works, but while we’re shaming the sluts (male and female alike), what about the people supposedly on our team who marry them? Shouldn’t the shaming be greater, since they claim to know better?

You have literally fucked the supply and demand curve in the Marital MarketPlace (MMP).

That isn’t on women, that’s on the right-thinking men who marry left.