Mantrums are degenerate

Chris Morgan, ‘Bagel Boss Guy’: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

‘member when men had dignity? Me neither.

Lump this one in with the Speedos guys who insist they’re not gay; with fake tan, waxed chests and a neon budgy smuggler.

At least this height obsession would make sense if he had a lifelong goal like joining the Marines.

“Another video shows Morgan slamming his bagel down on the ground while continuing to have a tantrum, before eventually taking his breakfast order and leaving the store.”

That is one severely hijacked amygdala. Two fuse breaks in five minutes?


Just find a short woman, there’s plenty of ’em. Move to Thailand.

“Bagel Boss told the New York Post that the man didn’t pay for his breakfast — a whole wheat bagel with one egg white and swiss cheese — before leaving the store.”

With the pathetic pettiness we’ve come to expect from triggered Americans. He didn’t even pay and he ordered egg white? There are no nutrients in egg white. Is he gonna blame his hormones next?
This kind of hysteria is unacceptable, from men or women alike.

It’s literally the modern fainting couch, public outbursts of hulk rage over nothing.

“Morgan’s YouTube channel is filled with first-hand accounts, typically filmed from the perspective of Morgan, of other confrontations he has found himself in. In his most recent video posted to his channel, Morgan confronts two 7/11 workers, who he claimed asked him about his height instead of greeting him like a normal customer.”

He claimed? No proof? Funny that. He seems to live for this stuff, which is hardly enviable.
Probably one of those guys who gets high bullying people. DARVO.
His claims meet the empirical criteria, going off on all women in a random shop.

Yes, cry, crybully. You walked into a shop and got ‘offended’.

Science, to the rescue!

https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/defineDARVO.html
“In a 2017 peer-reviewed open-access research study, Perpetrator Responses to Victim Confrontation: DARVO and Victim Self-Blame, Harsey, Zurbriggen, & Freyd reported that: “(1) DARVO was commonly used by individuals who were confronted; (2) women were more likely to be exposed to DARVO than men during confrontations; (3) the three components of DARVO were positively correlated, supporting the theoretical construction of DARVO; and (4) higher levels of exposure to DARVO during a confrontation were associated with increased perceptions of self-blame among the confronters. These results provide evidence for the existence of DARVO as a perpetrator strategy and establish a relationship between DARVO exposure and feelings of self-blame. Exploring DARVO aids in understanding how perpetrators are able to enforce victims’ silence through the mechanism of self-blame.”

“examined whether learning about DARVO could mitigate its effects on individuals’ perceptions of perpetrators and victims. DARVO-educated participants (compared with control) rated the perpetrator as less believable. While much more research is needed, these results suggest that DARVO is an effective strategy to discredit victims but that the power of the strategy can be mitigated by education.”

…like the “anti-racists” accusing everyone of racism while expressly moving to white countries to hate them.

Back to angry bagel man: (I think the term ‘manlet’ is cruel)
“Morgan reveals that he owns a cleaning company and that he is living in his car.”
He’s meeting the nomadic criteria for ASPD, at least.
“If I asked a girl how big her tits are, is that harassment?” Morgan asked the police officer trying to claim the two incidents are the same.’
Similar but not the same. Your height is not a sexualised thing. Height is not objectified. Fallacy of poor analogy.

‘Morgan pleaded with the police officers who arrived on the scene to do something, but the officer said there is nothing he can do over a “comment you don’t like.”’

Sorry, but I had to use that gif. Goes both ways, dunnit?

I’m getting strong SJW vibes from these guys – like fatties who don’t like to be told they’re fat, someone’s height, like their IQ, is numerical.

What he’s asking the officers to ‘enforce’ is Harrison Bergeron socialism, verbally then with impediments (so-called positive discrimination).

Censoring people from admitting biological difference won’t make them disappear.

“Morgan Continues His Reign of Confrontation, Filming Videos of Him Confronting Library Workers and People in a Bar”

Confrontation videos are left wing, it’s their victory lap for owning the legal system. Big Brother loves THEM.

“One of the workers insists that Morgan stops videotaping her as she threatens to get the police involved.”

Yeah, he gets off on this. Gamma or something else. Secret king vibes.

“The woman whom Morgan is videotaping claimed that her rights were being violated because she doesn’t want to be videotaped, but ultimately nothing comes of the situation besides another example of why Chris Morgan is the king of confrontation.”

In many places, situations and jurisdictions you can’t film, actually, (the uses of footage are also limited, no profit for instance) and I know that was a sneering reference to gammas, clever.
These guys have zero self-awareness (and possibly less empathy).

“In another video titled, “Fat f*ck at Grizzlies Bar in Bay Shore,” Morgan continues his documentation of height-fueled diatribes as he confronts a larger man in Jets jersey as he hurls obscenities towards the man who Morgan claims did him wrong.
“Ragging on my height all day, you fat f*ck,” Morgan yelled across the bar as the video begins. “All you girls for the big bullies.”

I figured this was just one incident, like a sane person would, until I looked into it but this guy’s obviously a serial bully (they go after both sexes but prefer one) and, from the bagel video, isn’t he rather curvy on the belly himself? He looked second trimester but it could’ve been the camera angle.
People in glass houses….

I wonder if he was this bitter and triggered before the divorce.

Does he think alpha = triggered?

Even a minor case of nagging men would be stressful enough to deal with. Narcissists test everything, though. They have predictable loops of ‘confrontation’ trying to get attention. When you know how they work (see Castalia House’s published works) it’s almost funny if it weren’t abusive to innocent bystanders.

“They don’t have a job, or a job as good as mine. They don’t have a car. They are more overweight… and they are judging ME?”
You can taste the entitlement. If he won’t accept his level, he can’t ignore the consequences of not accepting his level.
And for the millionth time, only gold diggers care about your job.

“he is considering pressing charges against the man who tackled him.” You told him to.

“After his divorce in 2007, Morgan seemed to hold onto a disdain towards women and men who are larger than him.”

So he is bitter about being a bachelor.
Okay, so?

It’s been twelve years. WTF.

Why is that meant to be the world’s problem? Cope. Get a therapist. Hell, get Peterson.

And that’s true clinical misanthropy, not just misogyny. Misanthropy clinically = ASPD.

Get leg lengthening surgery if it’s really height (it isn’t, pure cope for the personality).

“That’s why I have resentment towards women. I find them all to be stupid, gold-digging liars.”

…If they don’t want you when you make more money, how can they possibly be gold diggers?
Narcissists always lie.
And ALL?
ALL?
Like, he can’t find a short woman on the planet.
I dunno, maybe it could be ….personality? Anger management is cheaper than a lawsuit, just sayin.

Angry people get addicted to it, neurochemically.

““I’m not stopping and the world is going to hear me. I want equality for everybody.””

Humans are never equal, we’re a species. There are many objective metrics on which we vary, ….height, for instance…

Atheist angry at God… again.

Is this why satyrs are short and angry at young women? Was it an ancient testimony to rage cope?

Could you imagine if this were a bitter, post-Wall divorced woman angry about being called fat?

It’s just a detail, don’t let it define you, bloody Hell.

180 response from the hypocrites, it would be. Imagine what this guy’s gonna be like when he gets older?

Men rejecting masculinity

Alt title: men rejecting their gender role (then blaming women).
https://www.mercatornet.com/above/view/apatheism-is-more-damaging-to-christianity-than-atheism-and-antitheism/21642

“More nuanced and incisive rebuttals, such as Edward Feser’s The Last Superstition and David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions, somehow never quite achieved the same recognition.”

cabal

“The questions and debates engaged in by the new atheists were often reductive, emotionalized and glib, but one does have to grant that they at least tackled the great questions of faith in their way.”

All redditfags do is strawman and pretend to be House on social questions while their own lives are miserable bachelorhoods full of porn and video games. It’s like church ladies self-congratulating.

Yeah, in spite of mathematical certainty, they’re all 130+ and can’t spell or compose a sentence for shit. O.K.

The only way they feel good about themselves is crusaderism, finding a “sinner” and making them feel bad or stressed e.g. Christians.

“Its supporters soon tired of tedious and repetitive debates,

with their navel

and they began to argue with each other about social justice and political correctness.”

And failed, clue.

Nothing they say is original. They’re multicultural monstrosities.

“The answer lies in the grey zone between believers and atheists.

no?

If you want to find the real wolf steering sheep away from the flock, look not to fedora-bedecked atheists, but to your average apatheist.”

No, hedonist. They pay lip service to virtue to continue a life of vice, massive cognitive dissonance.
You are not special, broflakes. This is not a special thing worthy of a snowflake term.
e.g. they will say all men should be married, and refuse to get married. Idiots.
They will say all men do better in the military and call the draft “sexist” (like evolution didn’t happen).
Women are weak but should magically overpower any male attacker with kung fu grip (but hitting a man is sexist).
They will know about atheist sub-fertility and refuse to be religious because they think it’s beneath them, a status signal, and again, they’re avoiding patriarchal standards i.e. no manwhoring, no carousing, no drugs, no lechery, actual standards of historical masculine virtue.
They don’t want to grow up or can’t (emotionally regressed). Peter Pan spent all his time “having fun” and dodging responsibility.
The idea of being a gentleman or “respectable” is something they dismiss out of hand with another mis-label, cuck.
No, a cuck is someone who rejects tradition and history in their own life while verbally going on (and on and on…) about its importance, they’re cuckservatives hoping to freeload off the backs of real men’s hard work. For thee but not for me. They’re worthless humans, if they won’t contribute they should emigrate. They’d actually take a class on Penis Studies (Man Studies) because they’re so mind-numbingly boring (predictable, all on the same diet, same clothes, same haircut, same reading material across borders, like a cult of dull) and lacking in individuality.

They’ll say men should be providers – and refuse to provide even for themselves (a mantrum) and worse, defend deadbeats!
Cowardly r-types.

“It’s okay when we do it” hypocrites. They’re socialists who self-loathe in different ways. An abortion clinic on every corner and whore pills in every 13yo girl’s hands would be alright by them! Moral relativists. “Social liberal, economic conservative” cucks. All the gibs, as long as someone else pays.

You can only strike from your gender role if you were competent enough to have ever achieved it.

They reject their gender role, like male SJWs, in favour of materalism, atheistic hedonism (acting like an animal). It’s the exact same thing.
In their own ideal society, they’d be rejects!
Nihilism in the pomo sense of the word is the belief system of losers, it’s their cover for postmodernism while pretending to be oh-so different (special) from the SJWs (narcissism of small differences).
Even this article’s like “this is a new and special thing”.
No? It’s just that we notice because dueling is illegal (otherwise their lip would get them shot by a real man) and they can’t be cannon fodder without an overt war. This is what happens in the dysgenic situation when you let the Low IQ males with delusions of superiority (a self-proclaimed penis pass, if you will, on all sin) run their whining mouth about how, in the most spoiled society ever, they’re still abject failures! Oh, poor baby in your air conditioned palace on welfare! It must be so hard!
Their failure isn’t society’s fault, it’s a character fault and on the contrary, the ones bitching online are exclusively reared in the middle-class (they had advantages).

They have no excuse.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/19/middle-class-white-male-memes/

If a meme about a spoiled suburbanite Prince stereotype offends you…. it should.

Shame is GOOD.

Their slide down the social mobility scale is a sign the system works. You aren’t entitled to a better life than your parents unless you work at least as hard (complaining isn’t work).

I’d know.

9/10 they’re actually nagging. But they do nothing themselves. Only nag. We have male shrews! They expect the rest of us will step in like their helicopter parents. You’re an adult, we owe you nothing.

The Boomers are right about the entitled ones. It just happens to be the hippy kids.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-anti-spanking-initiative-is-r-selected/

Nagging only works if you’re bound i.e. parents, marriage. Nagging society doesn’t wash and given the advantages men have on many levels (that they deny “male privilege is a myth” when they seek to evade responsibility or champion with hyperbole “men are superior biologically” to signal, both when it’s convenient, like we don’t notice), they don’t have an excuse that blames women e.g. when boys lose out on math tests and other schoolwork, it’s because they study less around the time they discover porn. Asians can’t watch that stuff all day, look at their grades, it isn’t “all men”, it’s all degenerate men who make poor lifestyle choices. So they want a meritocratic system – but only when it leads to positive outcomes for themselves (liars).

If someone works harder than you, they deserve to beat you! Add up hours studied and you’ll find female (and male) conscientiousness isn’t bias, they activate with their IQ the traits which help them. The guy or girl “winging it” the night before deserves to fail*. Low IQ don’t have the IQ to know what they’re NOT doing! That isn’t everyone else’s fault! If there are systemic forces against men in some fields, the same must be true of women in other fields because that is how systems work, ya dummies!

Otherwise it’s like saying there’s north without south or taste without those tacky cheese squares at the other end of the spectrum. Logic is consistent! Smart men address the topic of stupid men – until they’re shouted down as “sexist” (???), like smart women.

It just so happens by nature that there are more lazy men! So yeah, they fail! Confound!

You cannot ignore the left half of the bell curve, men overpopulate it!

They’ve simply never survived in these numbers before because responsibility is the new leprosy in a decadent West. It makes a lot of sense actually. No prior society (that didn’t collapse) ever had to tolerate this much stupid and it shows.

If we live in clown world, send in the clowns…

War is like sexual selection, it’s a good thing that keeps the bad genes down. The modern world is like adding shit to the pool so it doesn’t feel excluded.
It turns out you don’t need to sterilize irresponsible people, just give them a free sex doll on condition they never have children (or they’d be aborted). We could solve this in two generations if we stopped listening to their “feelings” (they don’t have feelings, relativists, they only ramble and screech).

Seriously, hand them sexbots on condition of no kids to inflict on the future world (and no sex crimes, because apparently their hand wasn’t as big as their ego). They’re genetic suicides anyway, that or move them (could be cheaper) to a literal Pleasure Island with no internet (no corrupting the outside world) and they can never leave (I figured Westworld was about this, a brothel prison with no victims, would’ve been cooler). They’d OD in about a week without the nanny state. Actually, a literal death camp could work very simply: press lever 1 for food or 2 for heroin. Technically, it’s suicide. Dummies are predictably hedonic.

*They’ve been told it’s important for literally over a decade. You can lead a horse to water. Education is wasted on the lazy and stupid, and they’re the same people. That’s Dunning-Kruger. They’re blind to what they’re missing because they’re missing it!

They cannot see past their ego to anything, including Pascal’s Wager. Again, deny and dismiss, typical cuck.
The destructive person (antisocial to society) telling you you deserve to be destroyed (like an SJW) because society sucks unless it’s sucking them off (but it isn’t their job to fix it?)… boys who weren’t raised with real discipline have no shame (sociopath trait). They’ve been allowed to get away with ruining themselves and remaining psychologically as teenagers.

It’s just the dysgenic men too proud to become blatant SJWs. 

Actually worse than SJWs, wow. They’d sell their grandma for a porn star.

You can’t sympathize with people who hate you and your people.
There’s the obvious traitor and the sneaky little shits who under-mine attempts to make things better for everyone because the gap to their own life would become greater. Fifth Column is worse.

Why are Asians against Yellow Fever?

As a token, common example.

I came across this,

https://nextshark.com/asian-dating-website-creepy/


Fake femininity, told ya so. It’s fake as Bella Hadid’s plastic face.

They drop it when you put a ring on it – or stop making so much money.
They also drop it around other women, especially white and/or blonde women (seen as competition), which is how I know from plenty of experience. They do have a bitch side, every woman does, and if you’ve never seen it, it must be BAD.

Vaguely controlling in a distinctly abusing manner, behind a veneer of sweetness.
Read around, the worst kind of abuse happens with a smile. They do it knowing it’s hard to say no. Feminine wiles? Toxic ones.

To be fair, in some ways they have to be behaviourally conditioned as female and kittenish, girlish, to get a date, it’s a social pressure. If they behaved like mature and serious adults, the disconnect to their pedomorphic features would creep even a fetishist out.

They’re the biggest SJWs too but, sure, white women are the only gold-diggers in existence (???).
If the poor woman being hit on and harassed by these guys doesn’t go along with it, they chalk it up to a demure culture rather than being a bitch. Because all white women are sluts, right?

They say they’re attracted to Asians…
Until she refuses to dress, talk and act the way they want.
Usually like a teenager.
Nothing creepy about this at all. Controlling? Men? Domestic abuse rates?
Don’t look at this pesky things! That’s misandrist!
As she points out, it is …what is it they call it? Positive racism?
They still have their ‘white privilege’ even if they breed out. You don’t lose the racist card to SJWs.
The fetishists are still all about the women-pleasing and putting random women on pedestals, only they took a love of anime too far.
I feel sorry for the women fetishized who didn’t want any part in this, like the women that tool grabbed by the neck in Japan.
WTF is wrong with these borderlines and narcissists? The former is difficult to spot in men but they fear abandonment and therefore seek control in relationships, the guys going on and on about how a white woman would 100% divorce them but an Asian never would (I should look up those stats) are pinging.
Why does she show her guns, you might wonder?
Well, the lower dimorphism in Asians means the women are more masculine (by androgyny) than the average white. So they aren’t even more feminine, the culture has to enforce this!
That is precisely why the biggest SJWs are now Asian. They’re opposing the culture that tells them to fake femininity to get men interested. The future of social justice is yellow, with black back-up.

Peruse
http://creepywhiteguyspart2.tumblr.com/
at your pleasure
They don’t even like these women, and these women know it.
I’m on the side of the gold-digging Asian at this point, these bastards deserve it.

They think Asians are ‘tame’ and will hereby put up with any rudeness, up to and including abuse (including the lesser-known sexual sadism, ropes and choking and such).

http://iamwizz.tumblr.com/post/153009511824
“You shouldn’t have needed it, but if you did need proof to the “you can date a POC and still be extremely racist?” HERE IT FUCKING IS.”

They’re still called racist because if anything they’re more racist than whites who only date other whites.
They’re seeing the person, not the complexion. For signalling points?
Nobody deserves to be spoken to like this. No human.
Grade A proof of the Mantrum too. It’s literally nothing to do with him. They’re emotionally unstable but have no period to blame.
Thankfully the non-white women are onto the fact that there are crazy white men with personality disorders who think ‘dating down’ gives them an excuse to be abusive.

“Where are the real men?” Where are the ‘good’ men? Dead, mostly

This has applications for men but it’s mostly women I’m reaching here. Quick n dirty explanation.

The most common complaint from redpill women is about the lack of real men. Even in movies, they’re rare. Now, SMV-wise, women have more to complain about in this century than men, because women aren’t the leading sex in general, we rely on men to lead the way and we support them in this. If they can’t lead, they won’t lead and everyone is aimless. I believe this is the other reason real women can’t stand whining MGTOWers – they still don’t get it, they still don’t step up to the plate (even exclusively, selfishly for themselves) and expect women to act like Mommy with the apron strings and do his bloody laundry or something. To a woman, a man is either a lover or a son. We have a natural disgust, visceral disgust, for men who act like boys. Evobio could fill in the blanks on that one. Genetic fitness, parental investment and just being straight up pathetic etc.

Let’s get this out of the way: age group. Let’s assume young for sperm quality but adults. Immediately, a minority of men in an aging population. Basic education, more still. Can support themselves, getting slimmer. Not damaged/perverts/crazy, tiny group. Of this group, some will be gay, others will be already married or unavailable.

No! Some of you say reading this, There are more men than ever before!

And you’re right. It’s all about demographics. 

I am at one with the Miranda.

Go to any major city and it seems like there are more men than women. This is accurate. The crybabies are responding to a simple fact: the sexual marketplace is elastic. We know this from social disasters like easy contraception and abortion (about a quarter of UK deaths recently). The average woman has a bigger bargaining chip for what She Wants, than the average man. We can get jobs. We don’t need male support to have a basic living. This is new. So when you walk up to Ms Average, she probably isn’t being arrogant, she simply knows her value (which you hate) and your chip isn’t high value enough (because another man’s IS). You’re competing with the Invisible Man, who is at least her social equal. Women are social beings. She’s looking for a net contributor to her life. It’s the socio-sexual hierarchy. You need to be worth the effort, since women give up more (youth, fertility, beauty) by choosing to swim in the SMV. PUAs try to lie about their value which is no long term strategy and means you have to keep leaving like a con artist skipping town. Pretend you’re Miss Average. Let’s assume you’re a 5, nice, basic education, support yourself. Middle of the road on everything. When a man approaches you, why is he doing it? He doesn’t move in your social circle. Why not? He’s lower class. He’s even lower on the scale than you. This is literally the only way he can meet women. How should you respond? (Pity leads to clingers and stalkers). What if he’s fake, cocky and half-sneering at you, clearly thinking you’re beneath him, despite how you’re average, know you are, and he is no oil painting himself to need to be doing this?

Oh God I made eye contact with the social fuckwit losers.

This response.
It’s trying to avoid the mantrum of insults when you reject the fucker.

Note: mantrum = male tantrum, usually when you say no to anything he wants. It’s entitled, it’s like a little boy (see above disgust) and it’s inappropriate behaviour for an adult. Boundaries are normal and healthy and nobody owes you anything.

The demographics skew toward Asian men (globally and in cities like London), so white men are at a premium and have automatically higher value. Genophilia and human nature means the white women want white men. Nobody should be more pissed off about multiculturalism than the manosphere, specifically the EU ‘refugee’ migrant Crisis. Let’s ignore the violent possibilities. You see all those military age men? Millions of them? Which women do you think they’re gonna go after? What will happen to the SMV of Europe now, where all the white women at?

sex with actual women mgtow infight

Pro: Our value will skyrocket. Con: As will rape rates.

There are lots of socio-sexual issues of our time, I’m not downplaying that. One of them is delusions of grandeur from men raised on supermodels and porn who actually think they have a chance playing pro out of their league (forever, on a consistent basis, despite the rarity of those women IRL for similar reasons to marriageable men above). Yes, there are leagues. In Europe, we call those classes. It isn’t based on money or your passport, stop embarrassing yourselves bragging about being American or something like it’s exotic.

How many beautiful women are there in your country? How rare are they? How rare are you? The difference is the odds you have of getting one.

Women are suddenly responding to market demands in our favour for the first time ever. However, intersexual competition is ferocious, because the worthiest men are like 0.0001% or another ridiculous number. It’s like chasing a unicorn (at least men don’t have it as bad because they’re the sex that can make offers, imagine if you had to wait for that model to ask you out).

However, most women don’t want SMV. We want MMV. You don’t wanna be that dumb bitch who wasted her best decade ‘waiting’ for her ‘boyfriend’ to propose, she bought a lemon, it’s a sunk cost. It used to be that MMV skewed male (see video Economics of Sex), because men were rare, thanks to all those pesky things called wars culling the populations. Wars used to be eugenic. Let’s take a closer look.

Prior to World War, there were no exemptions. If you were young, you didn’t stay home. They threw you out there. Sink or swim. Then exemptions crept in with rich cowards, liars and people faking injuries. I heard that the bravest men who ever lived died on the battlefield, blown to bits by grenades or gored on barbwire and this is true, we’ve all heard the stories, their family got the accolades and Victoria crosses to prove it. What does that mean genetically? What happened to their line? What happened to the line of the men who stayed home while the others cats were away, surrounded by lonely wives? I’m guessing a lot of cuckoldry for the brave men who did make it home. It’s like the people who ask Where did the British Empire go? The men who made it died protecting it. When they died, nobody wanted to fight anymore by default, so it failed. It just stopped.

It’s faster for me to quote myself for a moment;

He’s right that the quality of men dropped before the quality of women. I feel the manosphere forgets there is another half to the equation. Post-WW, the few surviving men lived it up. Then the Sexual Revolution just happened on by shortly thereafter because women felt left out and wanted some of the attention. Men lost their motivation because sex is practically all they want from women and…. yup, that’s pretty much it.

Men gave up first. They gave up on the white picket fence for a few easy lays. They made their bed. They ruined women (and themselves) for marriage. They continue to ruin women’s MMV. If you contribute to the problems caused by sleeping around, by sleeping around, you don’t get to complain about the karmic consequences that affect you later. You ate the cake. Cake is gone.

The manosphere mocks women for saying “Where have all the good men gone“? Answer: They’re Peter Pans at home playing video games and watching porn, the Lost Boys, which hardly reflects well on men as they think it does, while all the time most of their discussions feature “Where have all the good women gone“? without a trace of self-awareness.

Either Husband Material doesn’t exist (statistically unlikely) like a unicorn or he does exist, he’s incredibly rare but he expects his social equal at minimum. In socioeconomic terms, the assortative mating of Upper Class to Upper Class.

These whiners who acknowledge their value in their troubles never have a high value. They can’t swim in those waters. Can you imagine them at a formal dinner? For an hour? They’d probably get drunk and ask how much the host makes. They have no class. They think James Bond is made by the cut of his suit or his bloody watch. You could put James Bond in sackcloth and he’d work it into social graces (with men too). How many of these losers could, while going on about insane confidence? How popular are they with other men?

What women are bemoaning is the number of decent men on their social level. They know the competition is too fierce for the few clustered around the top that remain. They pine for the Olden Days when there were a larger pool of decent men, likelier for them to snag one, who actually made an effort and men for whom their private life was not also their public life. They had class.

It’s all about class.

You watch a romcom and look at the most popular. What is their class level? By apartment? By income? By lifestyle (not debt)? They’re always beautiful people (high SMV already), youngish (fertile), educated (not stupid), who are well-travelled and well-spoken. It screams good taste. It’s lifestyle porn. The romance is just the plot. How many of those films would succeed if the guy was a dropout doing drugs and playing video games? Do you think she’d be swooning to a swell of orchestral music then? Really? 

Likely, he’s already hit the Wall. Bitching about the drop-off in attention – to younger men. What have they got? Hustle? Women value class over experience. Especially when that experience is self-destructive binge-drinking and game marathons. Who wants to marry that? Can you imagine them as a patriarch? 

The Disney Princesses don’t marry the manservant, do they? The clownish side kick, does he get respect? All these manboys are discussing their Princess, which is sweet in a clueless way, failing to realize that even if she exists, even if they met her, she would be well within her rights to reject him, because he ain’t no Prince Charming. 

Hell, he can’t even manage the charming part.

p.s. Charming is a trait that applies to all. If you are a man who cannot charm your fellow man, you cannot be charming. It’s grace, it’s etiquette and breeding. It has nothing to do with being nice or a pushover. Their social prowess alone is intimidating.