Gender roles are good

I’ll bang this drum around both types of sexist controlling pig until I die.

Nobody’s gender role is to oppress anybody else, those people are either insecure and projecting (cough certain religions) or straight up predators. Men and women negotiate and if a man in a couple wants to cook, that’s literally none of my business.

I don’t get the American busybodies judging a marriage they aren’t in – it works, for them, so who cares?

In a couple, they negotiate. That’s it. Don’t like it? Leave. This isn’t hard. It’s the purpose of courtship. MGTOW, MRAs, SJWs make it sound hard because they’re all scared of “getting hurt”. Okay, don’t date. That’s okay. If you shouldn’t be dating, stop.

There is no ‘boss’. It isn’t work. It isn’t a master-slave situation (at least… outside of the bedroom).

Why don’t more Americans get this? Did sitcoms brainwash you that hard? No spouse is on top. They are ONE. Made one flesh. They are a unit. Don’t misquote the Bible at me.

Demur on the topic of other people’s personal lives. I’ve seen ostensibly mens blog after mens forum turn into a huge gossipfest. Huuuuge. Men gossip way more than women now. It’s ugly. It’s also a sin but w/e.

Anybody trying to claim (including virtue signalling of how Their Marriage would be so magically superior) that one Group is superior, by existing, is appealing to Communism. Sorry. Marxists aren’t superior. It’s false consciousness to claim otherwise. This is communistic thinking in the extreme, dissolving your identity into the group (ego death but bad – groupthink, hivemind, the mob) and thereby being proven Worthy and magically Superior, 5eva. You are born and what that is, isn’t an accomplishment. Men aren’t superior. Women aren’t superior. It’s apples and oranges. Nobody is superior. The concept doesn’t apply to human beings, we’re individuals (or organisms). The Gender War construct is Anti-Natal psyops from Cultural Marxism, they openly admitted they wanted to destroy the nuclear family. Considering a man and woman are required, willing it, they triangulated the genders and their willingness to cooperate with their own race (in every race). The entire world is not a tribe, there is no Best Ever Man and Best Ever Woman in the Whole World. Even if there were, they’re still gonna die. Stoicism explained this thousands of years ago. It’s futile, an ego trip. Say you reached this Peak. So what? Or more scary, now what? How lonely would that be? Nietzsche’s concept of Ubermensch is an abstraction, it isn’t an instruction manual. Americans misunderstand a 19th century philosophy book as 20th century, direct self-help (which is Freudian in origin). He was heavily, heavily sarcastic in his writings, a fact many 7/8th grade reading level Americans cannot perceive, due to the age and translation of the text.

http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/10323/ddg#10331

At the fine-grained level, teasing and a kind of snorting sarcasm are among Nietzsche’s most common modes of expression. His writing is riddled with jokes and snarky comments. Unfortunately for readers, understanding the humor — or indeed recognizing when he’s having a laugh — often requires a pretty good familiarity with the history of philosophy, intellectual history, and arts in Europe up to his time. Nietzsche trained as a philologist, or what we would now call a “classicist,” and he assumes his reader is familiar with his classical references….

He was mocking the very guys who follow him dumbly, like Marx.

Poe’s law applies to old text too.

Context for:

‘It is not a lack of love, but a lack of friendship that makes unhappy marriages.’

‘That which does not kill us makes us stronger.’

‘There are two different types of people in the world, those who want to know, and those who want to believe.’

‘Sometimes people don’t want to hear the truth because they don’t want their illusions destroyed.’

‘I was in darkness, but I took three steps and found myself in paradise. The first step was a good thought, the second, a good word; and the third, a good deed.’

true joke joke true true, respectively

The second is very morbid because have you seen some injuries men returning from battle had back then? Lame, crippled, half their face missing.

The last is the Law of Attraction, if you wanna go there. Basic stoic thought control.

‘And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.’

A hopeful skeptic.

‘You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.’

Oh but that one isn’t edgy enough, bro!

‘Enjoy life. This is not a dress rehearsal.’

Don’t die for gains in the gym.

‘To predict the behavior of ordinary people in advance, you only have to assume that they will always try to escape a disagreeable situation with the smallest possible expenditure of intelligence.’

Normies but Victorian. Cuz we’re so smart, with our internet access. Our ancestors didn’t understand shit, man. Where is our Shakespeare? We don’t have one. Carry on.

Relative to the gender role thing:

‘Nobody is more inferior than those who insist on being equal.’

‘No price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.’ Don’t be a lemming, especially chasing after something that can never be real. It seems like a secular attempt at theosis.

Then again:

I have found strength where one does not look for it: in simple, mild, and pleasant people, without the least desire to rule — and, conversely, the desire to rule has often appeared to me a sign of inward weakness: they fear their own slave soul and shroud it in a royal cloak (in the end, they still become the slaves of their followers, their fame, etc.)

Oh, the irony.

Link: Seneca, Shortness of Life

Click to access on-the-shortness-of-life.pdf

Why do we complain of Nature? She has shown herself kindly; life, if you know how to use it, is long. But one man is possessed by greed that is insatiable, another by a toilsome devotion to tasks that are useless; one man is besotted with wine, another is paralyzed by sloth; one man is exhausted by an ambition that always hangs upon the decision of others…..

Character is important.

I’m tagging this with masculinity purely because it’s more important for men.

12 pages

Vices beset us and surround us on every side, and they do not permit us to rise anew and lift up our eyes for the discernment of truth, but they keep us down when once they have overwhelmed us and we are chained to lust.
Their victims are never allowed to return to their true selves; if ever they chance to find some release, like the waters of the deep sea which continue to heave even after the storm is past, they are tossed about, and no rest from their lusts abides. Think you that I am speaking of the wretches whose evils are admitted?

1821 burn

“We are assured, however, that the women of the East prefer the uncircumcised”.

All women do if they aren’t brainwashed, there are satisfaction studies to prove it.

Another thing that destroyed modern masculinity. You could never convince an adult man to slice off a huge piece of his manhood (you measure the area of skin removed once spread out) especially the part that’s most uniquely male and sensitive.

Tapping into female energy

Women need to be told this?

Women need to be told this.
I oppose fakers of masculinity and femininity because the energy is off and it doesn’t work but people mistake it for the real thing. Femininity isn’t just doing nothing, obviously.
It has nothing to do with men though. In a room full of women and all alone, being able to do that is normal. The mind isn’t the enemy, the mind isn’t some anxious blob of neuroticism like modern people assert. Neither is intelligence purely male, to look after a baby that can’t tell you what it needs requires a very real intelligence. In fact, intelligence is neither male nor female, the basic level of it is human. Too many skills overlap to think otherwise but men are quicker with rationalizations to protect their ego. This comes down to less of a work performance mindset and remembering you’re a person first. For men too, it would be useful to remember you are not a gear in a machine and to stop ruminating. A barrage of heavy self-loathing is not “thinking”.
The body’s already male or female so you don’t need to push it hard or try to parody your gender role.

Sincere masculinity?

I think the healer archetype is old as the hills (Matriarchal, but still) but some of you may agree with this.
He’s battle ready, he just isn’t cocky about it.
“Leave his brains”…? The line that made me question if that was a kid’s film.
Contrary to many, he’s too empathetic to be autistic (a low empathy condition by definition). He’s brimming with it like love juice. They like animals for simpler cues but animals may hate them. Because they can miss those cues. Other species have more complex cues in reality (better senses) but from a human perspective, since they cannot talk, they’re dumb. This character doesn’t fall into that.
Anyone who isn’t a beer swilling 90IQ yoohoo is called autistic in films now, especially if they’re calm in a crisis or solve problems creatively. How many autistic people do you know who never freak out about anything or think outside the box? [none, the condition is the opposite, not to mock it but describe it]

They admire it because they aren’t it. Modern people are taught to delude, to conflate identification with identity.

This numbs us to developing or questioning those learning models.

I think he’s a good role model for boys if we saw him on the expensive CGI adventures to actually get those things, like Indiana Jones with dragon eggs.

Why We Founded Phalanx

Low masculinity, good idea. I’d define it as base.
They aren’t men but animals.
Base women are little better, the funniest outcome of these expectations is that a woman who doesn’t act slutty randomly and with strangers is considered to be acting… “like a man”! That’s how far gone we are, it’s pure Orwell. As if women are supposed to be flirts, camwhores and sluts.

Even literal whores aren’t up for it, those are false airs.
I bet they think the porn stars are actually having an orgasm too.

The Spiritual Survival

Phalanx-bannerThere is a spiritual crisis in the modern world. Yet nowhere does this appear more so than among men. Leaving aside statistics that put men at 90% or above for suicides, imprisonment, and combat deaths, etc., it is clear that less and less often do men have any examples of healthy masculinity by which to measure, and to improve, themselves.

Rarer still do men encounter an authentic initiation into manhood — by which we mean into a life of physical, mental, and spiritual transcendence, overcoming one’s own limitations. Indeed, the words “masculinity,” “manhood,” etc., have become associated with juvenile behavior that is self-destructive and, at the very least, disrespectful to women.

View original post 422 more words

Why do hipsters have beards?

Actually a very good question.

https://aeon.co/opinions/how-beards-put-a-brave-face-on-threatened-masculinity

TLDR: Because they feel emasculated. 

imo…

A beard is a complex social signal: a man feeling powerless, as if he has no future, wishing to signal virility but closed off from proving himself by the hegemonic culture, no rites of passage, it’s a sign of Letting Oneself Go, and from this, rebellion against capitalist norms (cleanliness required to work with machines safely, get hired at an interview being well kempt and not being shabby, self-respect), a sign of testosterone in an age of estrogenic influences, a traditional marker of solidarity in the working class (shaving instruments were expensive and a Good Shave a sign of wealth), mild competition and aesthetic expression regarding type of beard etc etc.

Rich men don’t need beards, at most they’ll have stubble from travelling but be embarrassed of it. They find them too grubby, in my experience (do any of the Royals have one)? It’s viewed, here, as a Middle Class Scourge, because they aren’t imitating anyone in particular. It’s an image. The urban social climbers think it’s authentic and rustic and very Countryfile.

This impression carries over to business. Bearded men are seen as deceitful, note the stereotypes about types of beard and various character flaws. It can obscure or alter identity, make you hard to really see, who can trust that?

They are hiding something: their insecurity. 

Men are being outcompeted by women at school, at university, in academia, in the workplace, in Government and so forth, what’s one visible thing men can do with their appearance, that women cannot take from them (as they, silly, see it)?
With increasing androgyny, this is like, the ONE thing, they’ve got. Same problem with lad culture (really Eurotrash Ibiza club culture from the 90s, spare us), which has mistaken physical maturity (fucking, drinking, drugs,  swearing/being rude to all women as a form of underclass ‘humour’) for social or intellectual maturity (and respect).

A clean-shaven man doesn’t need to look like a furry animal to show dominance and a masculine nature, he has the real-world power and adult behavioural abilities in reserve that requires no display or show of symbols. In fact, counter signalling is their game.
It’s like the guy in credit card debt who buys a sportscar versus the millionaire who buys a secondhand moderately nice car on equity, because who does he need to impress? 

The blokes who say women are attracted to status? Ever notice they don’t have any to speak of?

Video: European men have been too feminized

This is sexual terrorism directed towards women” – perfect tweet.
Rape jihad is terrorism, Islamic State brag about coercing their enemies into submission, their trade in Christian women as sex slaves, the original type of slave (the word comes from Slav and they’re white as snow). They use jihad to target the men for regular violence (unless they’re little boys, equally evil, is it their fault for what they wore too?) in what are openly called ‘terror attacks’ yet dehumanise women into sex objects (acted upon, no volition or humanity, less than animals which at least defend themselves without getting arrested) and blonde whores (they’re all porn addicts), and the t-word is one the media dare not utter. Women hold the democratic power, and as I’ve already covered in the statistics, skew more conservative than men already. Those are the hallmark behaviours of an invasion, the respective punishments to men and women, without mentioning ‘conquest by womb’ as they admitted they’re doing. FYI rape can cause infertility and they get off on taking something belonging to another man (in this case ‘their’ women).

Even Hillary admitted there is a Christian genocide ongoing in MENA. Does anyone in power help? No. The rape of outgroup women is also genocide, because it prevents them from reproducing with their own.

The ‘men’ in power are weak and will be shortly removed.

Yes, they were raised by Boomers under cotton wool tactics but the pendulum is swinging back now. Replace Merkel with this woman.

If you look at all the Left wing demos over the past 6 years, there are increasingly fewer showing up and their fervour is dying. Look at the pictures, look at the numbers. I have seen this with my own eyes. The Open Borders protesters are actually the same people being coached into France or England as needed. It’s the same 50-100 people, over and over again as if to seem like there is wide support, as I covered in a Calais support post on their activities.

Every left-winger I know is shifting rightward on some positions.
The former gammas are still gamma, but quieter and they’re beginning to signal edgier positions.

The moderates are becoming conservatives. We’re battening down the hatches like a war.

Fewer men than ever are aligning with feminism, seeing it as a waste, and increasingly identifying with patriotic sentiments. (This doesn’t work for Americans because you pride your identity on a melting pot aka you’re doomed). Other identity politics still divides and conquers us, we are beginning to see national pride as the single point of legitimate, lasting pride. A house divided cannot stand and whether it’s male/female, white/tan, these divisive tactics are failing. The male/female Sex War is something the feminists want to rentseek and reduce the fertility of more attractive prospects. It is anti-society and Millennials are beginning to live up to our hero generation status, aligning with conservative family and economic values. There will be much screeching – because identity politics is dying. That’s the sound of the Left eating itself.

People are paying attention to the news, but not in the way foreigners think.
We’re using it as a starting point to research online and swap stories. We’re watching the videos and listening for names and drawing connections. We’re gathering intel in the calm before a very big storm. This is not mere passivity. We’re making history. The EU is supranationalist, we’re scaling it back down. The experiment is over, the gears are barely turning but the rest of you are yet to see it.

Why do modern women act more like men?

Pressure (caused by a failure of men).
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/200908/why-modern-women-behave-more-men

This argument was advanced most explicitly by Anthropologist Elizabeth Cashdan of the University of Utah in a recent paper (link is external) in Current Anthropology that is ostensibly concerned with changing female body shape. Cashdan believes that the optimal female body shape is not the hourglass figure of a Marilyn Munroe or a Scarlett Johansson with narrow waist and large breasts. In most societies, women actually have wider waists and such figures are more attractive to men in subsistence societies, such as the Zulu (pictured) where food is scarce and also in countries like Denmark and Britain where there is greater equality between men and women.

Youth (less developed breasts) and oestrogen (broader pelvis, disproportionately). The hourglass’ sole advantage is seeing that a woman probably isn’t pregnant, it’s her relative lower risk of fertility to a pelvic-heavy pear shape.

In societies where women are under pressure to provide for their children, increased testosterone production increases their stamina, strength, and competitiveness. However, along with stress hormones, testosterone also increases the amount of fat stored about the waist, thereby reducing stereotypical femininity of the figure.

Cortisol fat. It’s called cortisol fat.

… When they compete with each other for jobs, they are more interested in seeming competent than in looking sexy….

The only reason women act like men, is because men dropped the ball. Men failed us. We’re picking up the slack, even in the economy (who wants to be a wage slave, seriously?).

Such a neat match between body and behavior (or phenotype) and what is required for competitive success is really an adaptation.

It’s a circular process. Men become more feminine (xeno-estrogens?) and women respond, which allows men to fall further and further, lower and lower until we get to Pajama Boy.

One thing is certain, if/when women go back to our former ways, the guys don’t get to complain when we act like women either (aka not drinking or sleeping around with them). Expecting us to act like men whatsoever in the first place was ridiculous.