This article briefly describes Lynn’s view on what makes modern populations rise and fall. It then pro- vides a demographic analysis of what happens to modern sub-fertile high-IQ Western populations when Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (IRDS) combines with External Relaxation (ERDS, in the form of super-fertile low-IQ non-Western immigration) into Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (DRDS). The genotypic IQ decline will ruin the economic and social infrastructure needed for quality education, welfare, democracy and civilization. DRDS is currently unopposed politically, so existing fertility differ- entials may eventually lead to Western submission or civil resistance.
…While there is a lot of starry-eyed prognostication about the replacement of people by machines, fundamentally,
the below average IQ will have nothing to do, it’s a disaster
economics is about trade between humans for their subjective satisfaction. When a culture produces fewer humans, and demands more of those younger humans in the form of taxes to support the older ones, some people need to be imported to make up the deficit.
However, the people that can be imported are not like those that would have reproduced under different conditions. Rather than reproducing the society that existed before, mass immigration instead produces a mutant amalgam that isn’t entirely recognizable to the native stock. The people have different values, different productivity levels, different behavioral propensities, different religions, and different genetics.
….What has happened is, that given the crude egalitarian ideology shared by most of the country, one person is held to be as good as any other, with no differences that can’t be melted away by education and television.
This is not true: a people can’t reproduce itself by importing some other people from some other place. They think that they’re getting reproduction, but are actually getting replacement. Not all of the replacements get along with one another, either — crude racial categories like ‘Hispanic’ can include different strains of humanity that have hated each other for centuries, speak a different dialect, and don’t particularly cooperate well…..
The phrase “community relations” springs to mind, within a nation there should be no division.
The former video’s settings are now private.
“For the future of our children” banner.
Frustrated with the German government, a grand coalition of centrist parties that has engineered an explosion in asylum applications and refused to debate the merits of mass immigration, ordinary German citizens have taken to using the slogans and methods last used by their own dissenting parents in the eastern city.
Slogans such as “we are the people”, and taking massive synchronised ‘evening strolls’ rather than going on protest marches were techniques used by citizen objectors during the dying days of the Communist era in Eastern Germany, as well as other Soviet bloc nations. In Communist Poland thousands would take to the streets for leisurely strolls as the government-controlled evening television news came on during the period of martial-law in the 1980’s. They are now being dusted off again.
The protest marches were started by Lutz Bachmann, who claims to be a non-political patriotic European, after a series of violent street battles between extremist Salafist Muslims and Kurds in October. Breitbart London reported the extraordinary scenes as thousands clashed violently in Berlin, Hamburg, Bremen, Hannover, Dusseldorf, Dortmund, Münster, Frankfurt, and Stuttgart over grievances imported from the Middle East.
Shots were reported to have been fired over the course of the disturbances, and weapons including guns, knives, brass knuckles, iron bars, a machete and even kebab skewers were recovered by police during the riots.
Despite being a non-violent reaction to these events, the PEGIDA movement has been dismissed by left-wing members of the government as “nazis in pinstripes”. The protests in Dresden have been met by counter-demonstrations egged on by the government, indeed calling the march a “disgrace” Justice Minister Heiko Maas called for a “broad counter-movement embracing civil society and all political parties” to oppose them.
The variety of banners and comments by marchers reflect the way the movement has also come to encompass a broader variety of concerns, rather than just massive street violence by “ISIS terrorist Militias” in German cities. The Guardian reports the comment of one ‘middle aged’ woman who said she was walking with PEGIDA because “asylum seekers in Germany have expensive mobile phones, while I cannot afford such luxury and others still cannot afford to eat properly”.
I have heard similar stories in Britain.
Although Germany has been paralysed by it’s past for decades, the PEGIDA movement appears to be sparking debate for the first time on matters such as extremism, religion, and immigration for the first time since the war.
Banners included slogans such as “Against Religious Fanaticism”, “daring to tell truth”, and “Christian Dresden welcomes PEGIDA”. One woman told news crews: “I’m here because I’m worried about my country, I’m worried about my granddaughter. But I’m not xenophobic – refugees are welcome, but I don’t like economic migrants”.
Who wants to break it to her they’re the same thing?
Refugees never want to go anywhere poor.
Although the protests have been criticised by the main German parties, insurgent political force Alternative fur Deutschand (AfD) have expressed sympathy and support. Their leader of the party, which has been compared to the Tea Party or UKIP, Bernd Lucke said: “The greatest part of them are legitimate demands”.
An announcement by the group this morning stated the next march would take the form of a massive Christmas carol sing-a-long in Dresden’s Theatre Square on Monday. Entitled ‘Christmas With Pegida’, the invitation was extended to over 67,000 Facebook followers.
A German version of this;
2007 article, so probably much higher by now
It is the statistic that dare not speak its name, though eventually it must. It has huge ramifications for the civil and political life of this country, the health of the equity markets and, most immediately, the residential property market. So don’t forget you read it here first: the population of the UK is presently somewhere between 77 and 80 million.
That faint background noise you’re hearing as you read this is the sound of everyone slithering off the record. Why? In political terms, standing behind these figures would be to toss a hand grenade into a vat of gasoline. People would be hounded out of a job for scaremongering.
If the true numbers were revealed, the Little Englanders and xenophobes would come out in force about the evils of immigration. But that’s what made America great in the 19th century, and it’s a driving force of our economy right now. It’s also anti-inflationary.
And when I say “anti-inflationary”, I mean they are getting rotten wages. Dignified by the term “cheap labour”, the hidden hordes will do well for the services sector, among others. People are assets – to maintain and to be maintained – so we are wealthier as a nation.
Only good for the middle class. It deflates the working wages of the poor.
He said that immigration does not have a particularly bad or good impact on the economy, but that people’s objections relate to pressure on public services.
He said: “One argument said we’re a small island, not much room. On the other hand, of course, there’s masses of room. The urbanised part of Britain occupies less than 10% of the surface area. The urbanised part of Surrey occupies less of Surrey than golf courses.
“Since more immigrants mean more housing, more roads, more airports, more incinerators, more of this being required, and since the evidence would suggest that people by and large don’t like these things, especially if they are near them, that’s the key issue about immigration that people may wish to face up to.
Except the people of Surrey own that land, not the people who just turned up and expected freebies.
The Queen is the biggest landowner in the country, when is she selling up?
This is on top of pre-existing language needs of a student.
And as recent figures show that the number of school children using English as a second language has soared by a third over the last five years to 1.1million, some schools are investing in separate classes for non-English speakers, in which they concentrate on developing their spoken and written English to a standard which enables them to join lessons with fluent English speakers.
Despite the measures, there are fears that native English speakers are losing out. One London teacher told the Mail “It has become something of an unwritten rule in many classrooms that non English-speaking immigrant children are the teaching priority.
“Mostly, they are great kids – they’re full of motivation and determination and they’re desperate to succeed in this country. Invariably, once they master the English language, they go on to do really well. [DS: because the teachers show PC favouritism] I have never really felt too concerned about them. Eventually they become a success story. [DS: because all of the funding goes on them.]
“My worry is over the native English-speaking kids who are getting left behind because we do not have much time for them. These days we have no choice but to dumb down the language we use in lessons to accommodate the needs of non-English speakers.
“For immigrant, non English-speaking children this must be the best country in the world to attend school. How sad it is that in many of those schools, pupils who are native English speakers have become a low priority group.”
In THEIR country.
Do you think these kids don’t notice? Do you think they like this?
Last year there were 240 schools at which 90 percent or more of the students did not have English as a first language.
…why is it receiving state funding?
In five schools, not a single pupil was a native English speaker. And there has been a huge influx of pupils from Eastern Europe over the last five years, nearly tripling from 44,000 in 2008 to more than 123,000 by 2013.
The Romanian language recorded the fastest growth, up 527 percent over five years. Latvian followed, up 414 percent. Polish increased by just 136 percent, but recorded the largest number of speakers at 62,275. In total, the number of non-English, Irish or Roma white children hit 313,000 this year, up from 72,000 in 2010.
Professor Alan Smithers, the director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, said: “The teaching of English to pupils from abroad is taking up a large chunk of money at a time when expenditure on education is severely constrained, placing extra stress on our schools.
Don’t those teachers notoriously vote Labour and read The Guardian. Goodie goodie gumdrops.
“This is of great concern to parents. I know of parents who are so concerned about the impact of large numbers of pupils from abroad on the education of their own children that they have taken steps to move them to schools where they can concentrate on their studies without the distraction of non-native speakers.”
aka Good Parenting.
Isn’t this a child’s right? Literal right.
The influx of non-English speaking pupils is also of concern to the teaching unions. A National Association of Head Teachers spokesman said: “Gaining a rapid understanding of English is vital to help those children integrate in the classroom so that they can learn along with their peers.
“Children who do have English as their first language are also well served by this approach because it means that their learning isn’t compromised by classmates who are struggling long-term with the language barrier.”
Bullshit. You’re diverting small finite funds. Away from the natives.
Schools are already struggling thanks to the rising birth rate, fuelled
in part[ENTIRELY] by high birth rates within immigrant families. Romanian women living in the UK have on average 2.93 children, whereas their British counterparts have 1.84 children on average. Official estimates place the number of new school places required over the next decade at one million, and the government has pledged £5bn by 2015 to provide more school places.
Earlier this month, during a radio interview, the Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith said that the character of schools was being altered by the influx. New arrivals in communities are “‘literally change the schooling because so many people arrive not speaking English,” he said.
For those PC pricks who say the native children never suffer from multiculturalism and mass third-world immigration, I want to drag out a pristine piano and play them a thrilling rendition of It Ain’t Necessarily So.
And what will you be, when you grow up?
Muhammad has become the most popular name for baby boys in the UK, the website BabyCentre has revealed. While Arabic names are on the rise, TV shows such as Game Of Thrones have also inspired names for the next generation.
The list of the top 100 baby names of 2014 showed Muhammad has risen 27 places from last year to claim the number one spot for boys.
There is a surge in Arabic names generally, with Nur a new entry in the girls’ top 100, jumping straight to number 29, and Maryam rising 59 places to number 35. Omar, Ali, and Ibrahim are new to the boys’ top 100.
Sophia was the top name for baby girls, mirroring its popularity in BabyCentre’s charts in the US, Brazil, Spain and Russia last year.
But the biggest riser within the girls’ top 100 was Maryam, while the highest new entries were Nur, Emilia and Gracie.
For baby boys, Teddy was the biggest climber within the top 100. The highest new entries were Kian and Jonathan.
Sarah Redshaw, managing editor for BabyCentre, said: “With the increase of Arabic names plus Aarav, an Indian boys’ name, the top 100 shows the ever-increasing diversity of the UK today.”
The royal relegation continued with George falling a further five places. The name slipped out of the top 10 to number 13 shortly after the future king’s birth last year. Other royal names, such as Harry and William, also fell in popularity this year.
Redshaw said: “Parents have also been influenced by celebrity name choices. The Beckhams and Simon Cowell have been big influences this year. Eric, the name Simon Cowell chose for his son, increased by 314%.”
The names of David and Victoria Beckham’s offspring have also prompted a trend among parents. Harper is a new entry in the top 100 this year, while Romeo is up 67% and Cruz is up 400%.
Ariana entered the top 100 girls’ names for the first time, with singer Ariana Grande topping the charts this year.
From Game Of Thrones, the name Emilia was a new entry at number 53, with parents also registering the names Daenerys and Tyrion this year. The name Piper was up 267%, thanks to popular TV series Orange Is The New Black.
Breaking Bad also continued to influence, as Skyler, Jesse and Walter all increased in popularity.
But Ms Redshaw added: “Parents are wary of names associated with celebrities who exhibit bad behaviour, the pop singer Miley Cyrus being a prime example.”
The name Miley has fallen, as have Amy and Nick, following the release of the mystery thriller book and movie Gone Girl.
Popular names from the 1970s seem to be making a comeback, with the Emma, Sarah and Maria up 10, 32 and 12 places respectively. Angela, Joanne, Claire and Karen have also all increased in popularity and John has made it into the top 100.
Choosing an unusual baby name is also on the rise. This year’s more creative baby names for girls included Wren, London, Phoenix, Logan, Indigo, Genisis and Blue – inspired by Beyoncé’s daughter, Blue Ivy.
Among the more inventive names for boys were Prince, King, Junior, Hendrix, Braxton and Apollo – the name of Gwen Stefani’s son.
The baby names chart ranks the names chosen by 56,157 BabyCentre.co.uk members who gave birth in 2014.
The top 10 girls’ names:
The top 10 boys’ names:
As for deportation, no time like the present, but might I make a second punt for before they rape or kill anyone?
What if the melting pot of multiculturalism was never supposed to combine? As oil and water?
Marxism is an academic artifact. They despise the native working class who never rose up, but the unskilled immigrant class might.
It represents a concerted effort by Marxist-spectrum supremacists to destabilize and generate class conflict where it hadn’t existed before by proxy of fomenting natural racial strife through immigration itself.
Taking the civilized out of Western civilization.
Why would they need to destroy the white races when all they need to do is slowly remove the greatness within the societies that protect them?
This explains barbaric excuses for modern culture.
Even the left-wing comedians are pointing it out;
A better explanation, I think, using racial divides to stir up the ultimate class war.
Some of those white first world genes could be useful to keep society actually running. Like a weakened slave class or something…