Guardian, the mouthpiece for the State

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/06/22/guar-j22.html

The Guardian’s direct collusion with media censorship by secret services exposed

Minutes of Ministry of Defence (MoD) meetings have confirmed the role of Britain’s Guardian newspaper as a mouthpiece for the intelligence agencies.

Last week, independent journalist Matt Kennard revealed that the paper’s deputy editor, Paul Johnson, was personally thanked by the Defence and Security Media Advisory Notice (or D-Notice) committee for integrating the Guardian into the operations of the security services.

Minutes of a meeting in 2018 read: “The Chairman thanked Paul Johnson for his service to the Committee. Paul had joined the Committee in the wake of the Snowden affair and had been instrumental in re-establishing links with the Guardian.”

D-Notices are used by the British state to veto the publication of news damaging to its interests. The slavish collusion of the mainstream media ensures that such notices function as gag orders.

Fuq da CNN

I am curious, how do they intend to sue foreigners beyond their legal jurisdiction? Should the anonymous meme maker in question happen to be statistically probable to reside in parts distant?

What are they gonna do, exactly?

And haven’t they studied EU law? Parodies are legal, chums.

Punch and Judy is our intangible cultural heritage.

Right-wing activism that never was

There are two ways to win when the People are downtrod: voting and violence.
Thankfully voting has been winning.

Right-wing activism is a myth. A fable. A story. A narrative. A spin. Look at PEGIDA, what happened? Walking protests, banned by the State. All of them.

http://www.socialmatter.net/2016/04/05/right-wing-activism-always-fails/

I suppose you could write a political fairytale about this.

mashable.com/2016/11/08/benedict-cumberbatch-election-fairytale/

Aw, shucks.

As long as I can remember, the media has been claiming that there are Nazis, fascists, and religious right-wing theocrats hiding in every closet and under every bed, just waiting for somebody to express an opinion that was in vogue 30 years ago but horribly unfashionable now, at which point all these Nazis, fascists and religious right-wing theocrats would jump out and reveal themselves, impose a totalitarian government, and kill just about everybody. This would be horribly offensive to women and minorities, and therefore unacceptable. I would not recommend potential right-wing activists take the media’s word for it, however.

The media’s business model depends on printing comfortable and popular lies, and it is therefore full of society’s best liars. The media does not stop lying when it claims there are brownshirts under your bed just waiting to suddenly return and attempt a Fourth Reich. In reality, there are no powerful right-wing institutions, few if any powerful people who are openly right-wing, and no powerful right-wing political parties on the cusp of seizing power. But if the ordinary person realized and internalized that fact, there would be no need for the radically left-wing parties masquerading as level-headed moderates that rule Western countries nowadays.

The Left needs to justify its presence after getting everything they want(ed), so they make up constant barrages of new shit. They keep swimming left, dragging the Overton window with them and further reinforcing their power. This leaves moderate conservatism cast into the expanding shadow of Extreme, its prospects dwindling without serious measures and a will that simply doesn’t exist while bread and circuses continue.

If the Left are truly the underdogs, why is it trendy to support them in the Establishment?
Why does the Government fund far left groups like anti-fa? Who get arrested every time they ‘peacefully protest’? Including at other people’s protests?
Why did the conservatives open a Centre for Social Justice?
Why is the hate speech law not applied to certain groups, all clustered in the Leftist political interest?

These are the questions you aren’t allowed to ask.

But sure, you don’t have censorship, only there’s a list list of people you can’t disagree with.
Free speech is dead in the West, but arguably, it never lived.