Video: not an argument

People miss how beautiful that expression is. However, in specific cases, they should be able to break it down precisely why or they themselves have no reply, no argument, simply an assertion.
You have no requirement to answer a non-question, it’s a habit of socializing that we speak upon the completion of a sentence, it doesn’t require that sentence have merit. The Burden of Proof rests on the initial speaker, still.

Yet it can’t be used to outright deny or dismiss without having a specific reason why.


Meanwhile, the only way to effectively deal with r-types, ignore them, however loudly they scream.

See Best Post.


You only protect your own, but they have made it clear they are against you. Don’t lift a finger.
They say strength is bad until they want you to use it on their behalf.

Hey, if they’re so strong without their weapons, if their arguments have the same calibre as a bullet, go right on ahead and let them stand independently, you oppressive shitlord, and die that way if necessary. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

If evil imports evil, what is there to save?

Yourself, is the answer to that question.

Self-interest is rational. Pathological altruism is insanity.
You help those who would help you, the other side of the golden rule. Darwin’s rules. Sacrifice for people who would sacrifice you is patriotism dialed up to the incredible level of a cartoon character.

I swear most of Molly’s job is talking down the autistic from their pedestal of self-righteous stupidity.
If anyone deserves the Rasputin treatment, it’s a terrorist. Thankfully, your taxes go to pay people with guns already. The Parliament attacker guy? Shot, if memory serves, by a white guy with glasses. In a country that stupidly restricted guns. Even we don’t need you, Gun Bro. If the State can’t do the basic thing of shooting the bad guys for us…

I’ve never, ever heard of a liberal defending a conservative from any attack, ever.
Anyone?
They are not like you. They do not like you. Partially because you would defend them, implicitly stating they’re too weak to do it themselves. If you respect them as adults, leave them be. Let them live (and die) free. You are not their precious State, you have no duty to them, you are not getting paid, that is not your job ~z-snap~. You can’t play hero to two villains. They have engineered this setup on purpose. By importing violent left-wingers, they get the distraction to sneak off (reward of cowardice: survival) and the claim to victory (reward of victory). They literally do not lose.

If they don’t value their own safety, why should you?
America is too diverse to be united. You have the Diverse States of America.

He’s wrong about signalling (thinking) as a sign of tribe. Anyone can signal, its value is nil. How many of those diverse callers would help him, if he needed it? The odds are against, aren’t they? There are plenty of r-types signalling K as the idea spreads to new groups and creeps into mainstream awareness. The other day I heard a random cafe-owner say, “I want to protect this country, I’m like a wolf.” R-types invade by signalling. It’s a social invasion, they’re the fifth column, the barbarians sacking Rome from the inside, a swarm of locusts crying out as they hit you. History has taught us the hard way that ideological unity comes from genetic homogeneity.
The culture war is one of ideas. The weapon is a meme. A tiny little piece of information, a snippet of truth.

Signallers are, more often than not, liars.

They signal whatever ‘virtue’ is powerful, hoping for scraps from that table.

They are the begging dogs of society, asking you to hunt for them. It’s like every time Roosh calls for “someone! do something!” and his little internet boyfriends scurry to rescue the damsel and White Knights whatever he asks for. What are you, his wife? At least “think of the children!” defends the helpless. Adults have no business defending other adults. They rise and fall on their own merit, raised or dashed on their own petard.
K-society says: They do it themselves or it doesn’t get done.
R-society? It’s very espionage, ultra deceptive.
They offer you friendship while holding a knife in their other hand. They extend an olive branch first because it’s less effort, not because they like you or believe in the healing power of metaphor. There is a bargain they author, that you never asked for, and if you don’t like it, the carrot, they’ll ‘offer’ the stick. This is called a con. Con artists rely on confidence and trust. Virtue signallers rely on confidence and trust…

They want control over you, that is their power, to wiggle you like a little puppet.

In a victim culture, they are the biggest victims. In a K-shift, they are magically K-leaning.
Occam says: It’s all a lie.

I warned you, years ago. I knew these interlopers would pop up like fleas.
They don’t mind you dancing the right-wing jig as long as it’s to their exact tune.

Guess which is which.

If your friends are your enemies, you’ll never succeed. How to test?

A k-type invented the expression: actions speak louder than words. Until I see you sacrifice for this tribe, it owes nothing to you. If all you have are words, speak to the birds.

Just because someone is smoke-signalling your tribe doesn’t mean they’re on your side. Indeed, this makes it less likely, a friend doesn’t feel the need to keep reminding you they’re not a foe, not a threat, like they’re anticipating something…

DO NOT TRUST A DODGY SIGNAL.

The incongruence should ping to you. What’s in it for you?

In the super-complex theories of strategy, this is called A Trap. It’s a primitive form of distraction by claiming Ally while wearing the coat of your enemy to cuckold him for whatever reason before attacking when factors are on your side and you can turn your coat back and show your true colours. This is the problem with games like chess, where the colours never change sides because they were bribed or got bored. You never get betrayed in chess because the enemy never falters and it’s all very polite and open, two equal lines fairly opposing one another with Queensberry rules. That was 2nd generation warfare, we’re on four. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the reality that a leopard can’t change its spots. Who knows? I certainly don’t.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/226350.html
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
They don’t fully quote it for some strange reason. The Bible is actually very witty.

Ask – why do they want your trust? Why aren’t they doing literally anything else? What’s their game? 

It’s a great way to buy time when you know you’d lose in a fair fight.

aka cheating

If this was the 15th century, a ship running up your flag is probably pirates.

And they won’t kill you with rum.

Newsflash: BAD GUYS LIE. THEY LIE OR THEY WON’T FOOL YOU LONG ENOUGH TO WIN.

Back to terrorism. All the way back, centuries and centuries and centuries, like the ideas.

Self-proclaimed liberals have a lot in common with the mythological ‘moderate Muslim’; that is to say, they will claim to be loving and giving until they have power and numbers to be the opposite of those things.

The ‘American Indian’ only gave with the expectation of receiving more in future.

A liberal is a dictator waiting to happen. Biding their time until everyone else has disarmed and made nice.
They know exactly what they are doing. That is what guys like these do not get. Everyone else is slowly waking up. We make memes.

comment
“So if I’m understanding Stefan’s argument correctly it is: “While you certainly have the right to defend yourself, you have zero obligation to defend anyone else against a threat.” Is that the argument you are taking issue with? If so, what is your counterargument? If there is an obligation to defend others where does it come from?”
They want all conservatives to rush to protect them, like the police. While we are occupied, they survive and screw over the next batch of rueful idiots. The type who, at the Gates of Saint Peter, would claim the moral victory is more important.
The self-styled ‘liberals’ scoff at loyalty to children, nuclear family and country… until it comes to discussions of noblesse oblige (without class???), pensions, the social contract and human rights (without property rights). Then it’s all about universalism, collectivism and helping those who can’t/won’t help themselves. They are morally relative, liberal with logic ….wrong, in bad faith (100% deliberate). What they say is usually ‘not an argument’ because it comes from a hypocrite (no-proof), a deceiver (valid use, not ad hominem) and they argue it from bad faith, really pushing something else entirely under the radar.

They are loyal to their own body, especially the neck. They don’t want to save the pandas, they want to save their own skin.

In common speech here, they’re ‘trying it on’ i.e. they know they’re lying to get what they want and disappear when their half comes due, but they’re hoping you don’t know that.

All their virtue signals are overt pleas to get, without giving. 

Argument and clause. Devil and detail. Plan and plot.

Essentially it’s;
>HELP THE OUTGROUP! THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOTHING TO THE GROUP! SACRIFICE AT ALL COSTS!
>…STOP DEFINING THE INGROUP! THAT MODEL IS REDUNDANT AND EVIL!
and that, my friends, is why we mock them.
See: Why mockery?

It is also why you shouldn’t trust ambassadors. 300 was right.

That diverse cast of people calling into Molyneux are attempting to appease him while he gains power (they smell a whiff and cannot yet crush him) and then to advise him to his destruction once he has gained it (and after they have gained his trust). That is what high-IQ r-types DO. The toxic friends of the world. The fairweather traitors and degenerate preachers.

Clinically, they have many names. Sociopath tops the list.

Question a normal person: #crickets

Question a sociopath: you are (lie), (lie) and (lie), evil person! Appease me! Account for your sin!

They’ve found a scapegoat to slaughter.

Sociopaths especially detest those who describe their tactics to the masses for protection.

You can’t defame the truth, though, can you?

NRx v AR

It's a fantasy of social power above sexual power

Apparently this needs to be explained. Howdy.

Trump was partially elected because all the SJW CMists could do was evoke a ‘parade of horribles‘. ‘Literally Hitler’ ad hominem is that fallacy in reality. The enemy promised he’d be effective. They miscalculated that normal, sane people wanted the things they threatened.

View story at Medium.com

“It has been argued that neoreaction is just an elite salon that has no obligation to interface with the public.”

Ebony Tower?

2SD minimum barrier for entry is right though, hence normie-reaching memes.

NRx is the dialectic to the AR rhetoric.
It is the accurate, scientific foundation to your shitposting. The truthful basis is the edge the enemy cannot match.
The HBD IQ data behind the immigration memes.
The hierarchy behind the failings of democracy.
The religion behind the anti-degeneracy.
The history behind the memes.
The leadership opposing the cucks.
The enlightenment behinds the lolz.

“Personally, I think neoreaction does have a future, and will continue to. It serves as an indispensable bridge for intellectuals from outside of the reactionary world. If it were not for neoreaction, many of today’s younger Reactionaries probably would not be very reactionary at all. What other role models do they have? Andrew Anglin? Milo Yiannopoulos? Mike Cernovich? No.”

Study them for a change lol see how they like it

The model white societies found all over European history, that has not a Jew in sight. History shows what we can achieve and Yarvin points this out. The dark part is understanding we are in the real Dark Ages – of degeneracy.

“Neoreaction is more of a way of thinking than a coherent movement, a way of thinking distinctly different than the alt right but valuable in its own way.”

First, Trump got the Republican ticket because of the Zodiac theory, and don’t you forget it, or we’d all be sucking on Hillary right about now. People who didn’t know who Cruz was, knew that meme.

The formula for victory is simple.

1. don’t do what they want you to, always ask yourself the question
2. don’t fit their stereotype, ‘protest’ doesn’t work*
3. don’t be a degenerate when you’re criticizing their degeneracy (a lot of supposed* right-wingers, are not)
4. live the good life, be the happy model as much as possible
5. patience and indoor voices, the SJWs want to trigger you, be the voice of reason and let third parties decide
6. they hold the swing votes to bring in the people with the power over the CM academia to actually Do SomethingTM

We have memes and a dream. That’s all we need, baby.

jessica stam wink sexy

*use the enemies’ tactics against them
fight fire with fire
protest is a victory lap, the mind is the terrain

http://www.socialmatter.net/2016/04/05/right-wing-activism-always-fails/

*signalling subversives, liars, turncoats and hypocrites

Vice doesn’t understand kids nowadays

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/get-to-know-the-memes-of-the-alt-right-and-never-miss-a-dog-whistle-again

This is impressively bad.

whatsjwsimagine

This isn’t even wrong.

i don't even whatever

Like, is this black ops?

What if the perception is true or proven? huh?

They are literally trying to explain humour to the humourless.

What goes round comes around like a choo choo of bad decisions

So many words, so few thoughts.

I do posts of varying lengths and tag extensively. Choose what you like.

Needs more GIFs, frankly. To be frank. In all frankness.

What happens to people who suddenly land a windfall

You don’t get to, like, define us.
You’re culturally irrelevant, GTFO.

Additionally, the movement is in and of itself a semi-self-aware meme that seems to only exist within the safe, anonymous spaces of the internet.

public, also private

K.

What to do when the "intellectuals" hit reality like a brick wall? Laugh, I guess

They found the memes, guys. We should be scared.
They may, possibly, disapprove. SHUT IT DOWN.

Just as memes tend to be cringey and ineffective when taken offline, one of the alt-right’s most publicized IRL events, the “DeploraBall” was widely regarded as a colossal shit-show due to the physical and ideological infighting.

#notmyballs

That wasn’t us. Those were people cosplaying us.
Why would we court MSM attention when you’re irrelevant?

alternativemediamontypythonarmygag

To say nothing of the libel and life-ruining, thanks to SJW monster mobs.

Shit-posting for keks

Yes. Yes, that’s exactly it. Start on WOW. It’s all them.

darker machinations often lay beneath the group’s claims of simply wanting to troll SJWs.

an anonymous disparate group with public, stated united goals?

K.

Pictured: our literal motivation. We’re the punks of the internet.

Gary Oldman speaks to me on a spiritual level

You can’t kill bored apathy.
We’re making burgers of your sacred cow.

We’ve put together a field guide of some phrases and memes white supremacists share with one another so that, if you happen across one in the wild, you’ll be able tell whether your old college friend, Gary, is simply a fan of 11th-century history or secretly wishes to eradicate all non-whites.

Think of it like a gameshow where anyone too stupid to wise up to redpill will die a financial death and it becomes tolerable.

All the Mean Girls GIFs.

obsessed with me mean girls regina george

Let them keep punching paper tigers.
This is gonna be funny.

I haz plans, ma mans.

Meme War 2016

memewar

Credit: GSOGM

…Started it.

Who’d believe me, right? Being female. I’m hardly the only one by far but… I mean, it’s an internet principle old as Anonymous to hide who or what you are to accomplish a task, to lose your identity for a cause, but its tricky to explain in this case because it relies on a happenstance interaction of parts of the internet which simply didn’t talk to each other, and rarely knew of each other’s existence or principles beyond propaganda.

Short v?

It was neoreaction, ripped off by the manosphere and empowered in tactics by Gamergate. This is the secret recipe to the Alt Right.

A spicy splinter of rhetorical shivs based on the past century’s failures of Leftism.

First there were bitchy but logical comments. That didn’t work. (Gen X)
Then there were poignant GIFs. That didn’t work. (Gen Y)
Then there was shitty MS Paint meme. How did that work? (????)

It still boggles me.

All this time, society needed smart people to shitpost?

Memes contain a message, the medium is the message. We simply based ours on reality and people cried out for it, hungry and eager for the truth after decades of media misinformation.

We were pointing out their stupidity and mocking their hypocrisy.

The false piety, social signalling pathological altruism set never have a sense of humour either.
There were layers. Like an onion.

Fun fact: the first widespread meme of ours was TFW.

Fun fact: the first widespread meme of ours to hit normies like a boulder was TFW, parodying the SJW Tumblrina notion of ‘feels’ with white, hetero male issues.

Similarly, Pepe was brought out of the shoe box. I like frogs* and Fight Club, so what?

Blame the 90s (90s kid memes, also us) and the Muppets. It’s no coincidence he’s sipping tea disapprovingly. They love reading into pop culture so we gave them shit to work with.

Remind you of anyone? Very English, si?

Literally me.

Drink of monarchy and colonies.

Everyone knows memes don’t have a source, like ancient ideas.
They arise magically and anonymously. Their purpose is sharing. It’s very Marx, really.
Cultural transmission…. of Marx.

Sippy sippy.

Why do this?
Why be alternative?

alternativemediamontypythonarmygag

I remember when we’d put Impact on cats and consider the job done. Ah, 2009.

It’s a good, old-fashioned British wind-up, m8.

The response?

MSM pages of writing. That doesn’t work, even when it’s true. It’s old media.
The GIF offensive. That doesn’t work, it’s non-nonsensical. There’s no message to meme, it’s a VERB.

We’ve seen them fake craptacular memes and false flag them from us. One problem. There’s no truth. Incidentally, they’re not funny. It rings false. Reverse search, bitches. You might have trouble with technology and fumble with a kidd-i-phone but your target readers don’t. They can tell when fake news comes out of bought organisations. The authority of a name is only as trusted as the journalists working under it. Citizen journalism has come to politics.

Still, this explains the monarchy/tradition/democracy digs, from Neoreaction, frustrated at false conservatism of broken liberal 20th century values. Brexit is obviously a pro-monarchist stance of sovereignty. It explains the bitchiness of the manosphere and the splinter anti-feminists, a single cause solution to which Trump was the answer and begins the long arduous task of moving back the Overton window to the true, social middle. Gamergate roped in outraged libertarians who just wanted to game in peace and allowed a trial of never-before-seen Lefty tactics armed against them from technically their own, the classic liberal, like shooting them with their own cannon.
The Alt Right is really a variation of the Dark Enlightenment, just read. This explains the focus on what builds a good society, the computer metaphors (tech nerds) and HBD forbidden sciences, like hiding alchemy. The redpill with less blue balls caused by the Cathedral, now Swamp’s Cultural Marxism. I think that’s it, really. In summary.

If you want to be at least two years ahead, go to Gromar and co.
http://neoreactionarymap.blogspot.co.uk/

You will notice I am not there, but pretty much my ideas are cited everywhere.
I cross-post and cross-fertilize like a bisexual guy.
I’m not formal enough to fit in anywhere…

How also to avoid Entryism, post GG.
http://www.henrydampier.com/2014/02/libertarian-hiv/
heehee me-me
http://www.henrydampier.com/2016/08/debut-column-daily-caller-pepe-really/

The manosphere was cynically riding a trend wave and borrowing the way we used certain ideas to sell their personal brand and get internet celebrity or hedonism. We disliked that and spurned them from trying to claim to be one of us, since they aren’t in any way, shape or form. Their personal lives expose they’re anything but traditional, they’re SJWs with a little more Machiavellian logic, it’s a fairweather association on their side for shekels. They’re happy to try and slander the real people, including me. It’s rather funny because they haven’t the reputation for their accusations to be believed, if anything it improves their opponent’s profile.

Many have pointed to GG in the MSM but that wasn’t really it. GG was a consumer rally cum conspiracy theory. The ideological basis is firmed grounded in NRx, vast and lengthy treatise written by fine people and I’m still listed around the place and cited as one of those sites. We’ve expanded to approach the common man as audience, instead of staying in our academic dry bubbles and finally, the conservatives are fighting to reinstate and preserve things.

The SJWs cannot leave their bubble. Reality is hostile to thee.

The victories of 2016 were laid into the fertile soil at least two years ago with the crystallization of NRx.

A couple of years ago around late 2013/early 2014 when NRx became a Thing, we were discussing the need to reach a wider, more normal and probably less autistic audience. NRx has a barrier to entry by IQ, certain conceptual ideas are out of reach for common people (academia background of many of us, I admit it) although we did pilfer some rationalists from LW before it went under with entryism. There are thousands of pages of NRx, it’s more commitment than a religion and very self-referenced, so while applicable to society’s needs and good per se, we agreed it would be better to use more real names and identities without falling for the siren lure of MSM-appeasing celebrity like the manosphere/PUA manwhores. [1] More indexing sites by specific subject and academia-neutral or journalistic places were set up during this time. I came back in to do this and help with this, including spreading the word in person, in secret (STEM, mostly). This reached influential people, eventually. It was a social experiment, we had no idea what would be.

I’m not the only one to know this or notice the curious correlations between ideas of supposedly distinct internet tribal peoples. (Though I am one of the half dozen who moves easily between these parties).

example

http://atavisionary.com/trumps-neoreaction-connection/

Merry Christmas.

2016, year of the cultural crusade.

It doesn’t end there.

sarcasm scott I'm fine okay good great lol happy

You think I didn’t have advanced plans? Really?

Christmas came twice for me, I got everything I wanted this year.
The globalists can’t target the faceless, they can’t attack the abstract.
Ideas are bulletproof but people are not. Ideas can be forgotten… or remembered.

membersj

The time has come.

[1] For the time being the ‘manosphere’ (truthfully dead for a long time thanks to dead weight) cheer-lead some of our muted, watered-down ideas, signalling their ‘neomasculinity’ (what a rip, I wonder what they reference there) but generally they censor aspects of reality they don’t like, worse than SJWs because they’re doing this knowingly, like border laws for their sex tourism, ignoring human rights in Europe because they apply to feminazis too. They want to be edgy and they want money. They will never do this for free like NRx, GG or the real AR. They are whores of Patreon plugged into the system we despise, they’re false opposition that will defend it when the time comes. Just look at the way they treat women, when Patriarchy would string them up. They’re mostly either in the shady world of supplement sales or con artists promising The Secret, with more dicks. The manosphere will claim anything for attention so generally we ignore them and side-eye the fact a pro-white society movement (50s America) is happily led by kebab.

*Yes, that was the reason. https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/09/03/feminists-angry-at-a-puppet/
They’re forced to cover our memes, the pure raw idea, to deny it. A meme is a trojan horse of ideology.