Explains the persecution complex.
Explains the persecution complex.
I’m not even surprised any more.
What are you people on?
And didn’t the cannibal of the Hannibal books end up snagging the detective bird anyway? And making her a cannibal? Did they run away together or am I mis-remembering?
A heartwarming tale of gaslighting, murder and cannibalism indoctrination.
Obviously Hollywood had to adapt the series.
Ed Gein and Gary Heidnik were real. With womb transplants, expect a lot of women to go missing or have organs robbed.
Freudian issues and autogynephilia go hand in hand.
You have to be pretty special to get a mention in American Psycho.
Like the gay propaganda about how happy (not suicidal and diseased) they are, there’s tranny propaganda encouraging women to trust them. Despite crime stories against women.
At best, the normalisation with musical numbers is the sneaky fucker strategy. At worst, they’ll rape you like the female prison psycho or by their forum activity, wanna steal your womb.
We look at them with increasing skepticism, especially as they go after children.
You can fake all the flamboyancy you want, your “femininity with a penis” will never out-weigh the kind of feminine real women have. Interesting to note which is shamed and which celebrated. They actually think they can best women, at being women. The gay guys tried to do it with mannerisms and appearance, rather than butchery of anatomy and nabbing model contracts.
They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.
e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.
Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.
e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.
Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.
r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.
“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.
It’s a perversion of gender role.
A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.
If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.
Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.
He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.
They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.
“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.
An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).
It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.
- He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
- He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
- He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
- On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
- He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
- He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.
If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.
3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.
Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.
Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.
Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.
Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.
Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.
Idiots. Defective brains.
The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.
Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.
“Men with tattoos are likely to provide serious competition for a woman’s attention, at least in the eyes of other guys, but women themselves actually aren’t that impressed. That’s according to research published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences, where 2584 heterosexual men and women from Poland viewed photos of shirtless men, sometimes digitally modified so that their arm was emblazoned with a smallish black tattoo depicting a generic symbol. The 215 men among the participants rated the inked bods as more attractive than tattoo-free comparison models, which presumably reflects in part what they think women are looking for in an ideal male partner. But the female participants didn’t rate the tattooed gentlemen as more attractive; moreover, they considered them worse prospects as partners and parents.”
Men like tattoos, not women.
Men cannot judge what women want….
Unless they’re bisexual. There’s a reason homosexual men love tattoos.
And that was with a small tattoo.
If low IQ men are doing it, don’t!
The cultural conformity is based on Hollywood, hook them up to lie detectors and look at female dating history.
Look at whether they shun such people or deny offers from them.
Do a perception of IQ and personality disorder study.
Otherwise it’s like racial studies, the impulse to be agreeable will cause them to lie about the intensity of their repulsion. Look at what they DO.
“The presence of tattoos on forensic psychiatric inpatients should alert clinicians to a possible diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder, and also about the potential for histories of suicide attempt, substance abuse and sexual abuse, according to research published in Personality and Mental Health.”
Sauce police, take note.
“The prevalence of tattoos is higher among people with mental disorders and those likely to come in contact with mental health services. The motivations for acquiring a tattoo are varied and tattoos can give clues to the presence of particular psychiatric conditions and to the inner world of patients. Psychiatrists need to be aware of the health and safety issues surrounding the tattooing procedure and be able to give appropriate advice to their patients if they wish to acquire a tattoo. The issue of capacity must be considered. This may be particularly relevant for clinicians working with adolescents, the most common age group for acquiring tattoos. Owing to the high proportion of adults who subsequently regret their tattoos and the associated psychological and social distress, clinicians should be aware of methods of tattoo removal.”
Maybe the Nazis should’ve let the mad ones brand themselves?
I’m going through a traumatic time in my life, let’s brand me with a lifelong reminder! That’ll help!
Biased researchers can’t find anything good, such as higher creativity.
“Conclusion: Tattooed students seem to be neither less intelligent nor more creative than other students.”
Didn’t study general pop., students are already filtered by IQ.
Tatted people are not more creative.
They do, however, make an unusual “baaa” sound.
The types of “health” are related, really? Shook over here.
If only there were a physical connection we could see like some kind of fleshy vehicle of testable units, a body of some description. No, we’re floating blobs of consciousness in a cloud of feels, aren’t we?
Mutation (genetic) load is true, at least somewhat but who dares to directly study it? Instead we are left with related variables.
“The lifespan of people with severe mental illness (SMI) is shorter compared to the general population. This excess mortality is mainly due to physical illness. We report prevalence rates of different physical illnesses as well as important individual lifestyle choices, side effects of psychotropic treatment and disparities in health care access, utilization and provision that contribute to these poor physical health outcomes.”
“Nutritional and metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, viral diseases, respiratory tract diseases, musculoskeletal diseases, sexual dysfunction, pregnancy complications, stomatognathic diseases, and possibly obesity-related cancers are, compared to the general population, more prevalent among people with SMI.”
People with mental problems can’t take care of themselves, really?
Not to be harsh but, is this news?
I searched, not one mention of fitness.
Ability to reproduce (here it would be impotence for age in the male) and carry (childbearing without issue for age, the female) is a significant component of it (organism fitness, for the nerds at home).
“struggle for existence”, he repeated in description
the vindicated theme for this post
“Besides modifiable lifestyle factors and side effects of psychotropic medications, access to and quality of health care remains to be improved for individuals with SMI.”
Enough of that for now.
And they’re exponentially more expensive.
I dislike this fact but…. the information is out there. We can’t help by lying.
There isn’t just one thing causing the “mental” disease and another separate thing causing the “bodily” disease.
It’s all genetic! At least, moderately genetic.
And remember I said exponential risk of suck?
“Charlson Comorbidity Measure: The Charlson model predicts the risk of one-year mortality for patients with a range of comorbid illnesses. Based on administrative data, the model uses the presence/absence of 17 comorbidity definitions and assigns patients a score from one to 20, with 20 being the more complex patients with multiple comorbid conditions. It is effective for predicting future poor outcomes. This method is explained in further detail below”
You cannot fight math. You will lose.
poor outcomes = death, more or less
This is tough to read like the IQ link. I wouldn’t blame you skipping all this. You cannot unsee it.
“One thing all of these models have in common is that they are based, in some degree, on comorbidity. Understanding comorbid conditions is a critical aspect of population health management because comorbidities are known to significantly increase risk and cost. In fact, a study from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports that care for patients with comorbid chronic conditions costs up to seven times as much as care for those with only one chronic condition.”
Twice the condition can be seven times the cost. I’ll leave you to think about that.
Is this systemic injustice?
The body is complex, various conditions interact with one another. Not killing the patient by accident due to Condition B to treat Condition A needs time and more research and more money!
“Expenditures and gaps in health care delivery are not evenly distributed across the population, however. To improve health care quality and reduce costs, policy-makers must focus on particular subgroups who are at greatest risk. Persons with mental health and medical comorbidities represent just such a population.”
“The pathways causing comorbidity of mental and medical disorders are complex and bidirectional.
What I said.
Medical disorders may lead to mental disorders, mental conditions may place a person at risk for certain medical disorders, and mental and medical disorders may share risk factors“
It’s all healthcare, people!
ALL OF IT.
For instance, low IQ can also ’cause’ someone to more likely get heart disease.
Here’s a clunker of a line.
“When mental and medical conditions co-occur, the combination is associated with elevated symptom burden, functional impairment, decreased length and quality of life, and increased health care costs.”
This upsets me. Just world is a fallacy.
Bear in mind the IQ/depression link in the last post:
“At the same time, major depression is a risk factor for developing chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease.”
If the economy is making people of a certain IQ band effectively useless, they’re going to be depressed.
Especially if “their” jobs owed by their home country are outsourced to visa people.
“Exposure to adverse childhood experiences such as trauma, abuse, and chronic stress are all associated with both mental and medical disorders, and responsible for much of the high rates of comorbidity, burden of illness, and premature death associated with chronic illness.”
It’s sad. It’s sad to read about. That is a harrowing existence.
But stress shouldn’t be lumped in with trauma and abuse.
“Many of the most common treatments for diseases may actually worsen the comorbid condition.”
You tell me where the solution is because I don’t see it.
A society of hospital patients (don’t forget aging demographics).
Over to Oz.
“Mental disorders were more common among people with chronic physical conditions (28.0%) when compared to people who did not have a chronic physical condition (17.6%).”
The data is usually out there. Tough to find but present.
“This article briefly reviews the associations
among alcohol dependence, major depressive disorder, and
posttraumatic stress disorder. Dysregulation of the brain’s and
body’s stress system (i.e., the limbic–hypothalamic–
pituitary–adrenal axis) might serve as a common mechanistic
link to explain some of the relationships among these
frequently comorbid conditions. Finally, the article examines
the role of sex differences in stress circuitry. These differences
may explain why men and women differ in their risk for
developing comorbid alcoholism and stress related disorders.”
Addictions play into it too, because of course they do.
And you can’t really blame sexism for an individual’s brain circuitry.
Let’s look at one more substance and how it alters development (i.e. when children/teens/young adults use it).
An interaction of marijuana and low IQ they won’t study so here’s something odd.
“Psychotic patients who used cannabis frequently before illness onset have higher genetic predisposition to schizophrenia than those who did not”
“Our study supports an association between high SZ-PGRS and frequent cannabis use before illness onset
in psychosis continuum disorders.”
Before someone points to this classic arse-covering exercise,
I linked because you wanted info on school shooters and pot use is a major factor.
Naturally the drug use wouldn’t change IQ because the IQ is the causative factor in having a childhood addiction problem.
However the study compares ongoing users to abstaining, not ongoing addicts to a twin who never did the stuff, there is no control group, making this link pointless so don’t try to send me it. I’ve seen it.
When the brain is developing, there is a permanent loss of functioning.
And abnormal function. Like with any drug to any developing organ.
For the ‘self-medication’ lie:
“The use of marijuana did not correct the brain function deficits of depression, and in some regions made them worse.”
“Of additional interest, those participants who used marijuana from a young age had highly abnormal brain function in areas related to visuo-spatial processing, memory, self-referential activity and reward processing.”
No, they cannot perceive themselves accurately.
This whole drug study in children (<25) thing is like breaking someone’s kneecaps with a baseball bat and wondering why they can’t sprint. You wouldn’t give them alcohol and tobacco, why give them anything else that’s an addictive drug and think it’s fine? Why not nice and “natural” opioids next?
[ I googled this as a joke and fuck you, America.
druggy parent trash pushing it on the kids? That’s low. ]
Why not the ankles too? Why not?
I firmly believe some of these kids have the misfortune that their parents are their worst enemy in life.
“The study found that early marijuana use was also associated with lower IQ scores.”
Associated. Which first? The lower IQ or child drug abuse?
“With past research suggesting a genetic role between marijuana use and depression, Dr. Osuch and her collaborators at Western University’s Robarts Research Institute also conducted genetic testing on participants. They discovered that a certain genetic variation of the gene that produces Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) was found in greater proportion in youth who used marijuana from an early age. BDNF is involved in brain development and memory, among other processes.“
Could be a race-based finding, unclear.
“This is a novel finding that suggests this genetic variation may predispose youth to early marijuana use,” said Dr. Osuch.”
So how many of you heard about it in the MSM?
Funny how they trust none of the political news but all the scientism rationalizing living like a CA Democrat member.
It doesn’t have to be good universally for you to do it, like smoking tobacco, just admit it can be bad for society and move on. Denial of biology makes it more annoying and a full ban more likely. Shaming normal people for being “squares” is what all druggies do including alcoholics.
Why link that here?
What would drug use increase, in the organism? Mutation rate. The genetic load (whatever it was) becomes heavier. So to do that before reproducing, knowing the adverse effects, the child/ren will be worse off as well. So much for “doing no harm” and “victimless crime”. Eventually parents will be sued by their children for bad lifestyle habits that damaged their personal genome (and their children’s genome etc). It’s coming.
I warned you, cannot unsee it.
Read it and fucking weep.
If you understand it, you’ll want to.
Researchers have hypothesized that people with lower IQs may have a higher risk of adult mental disorders,
less ability to thrive in the world leads to depression, really?
but few studies have looked at the relationship between low childhood IQ and psychiatric disorders later in life. In a new, long-term study covering more than three decades, researchers at Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
sorry is three decades by Harvard not good enough for some of you?
while you’re playing the Devil’s fiddle of appeal to authority?
“Well, this wasn’t in the Guardian” YEAH.
No prizes for guessing why.
found that children with lower IQs showed an increased risk of developing psychiatric disorders as adults, including schizophrenia, depression and generalized anxiety disorder.
but not limited to
Lower IQ was also associated with psychiatric disorders that were more persistent and an increased risk of having two or more diagnoses at age 32.
Wow the asylum special? Next post about that, regular hospitals are fast becoming the new asylum.
Because “stigma” is a great excuse to endanger regular populations.
The study will be published online December 1, 2008 and in the January print issue of The American Journal of Psychiatry.
The study participants were members of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a cohort of children born in 1972-1973 in Dunedin, New Zealand. At the initial assessment at age 3, the study had 1,037 children. The participants were also interviewed and tested on their overall health and behavior at ages 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 21, 26 and at age 32, when 96% of the original cohort participated. IQs were assessed at ages 7, 9 and 11. Psychiatric disorders were assessed at ages 18 through 32 in interviews by clinicians who had no knowledge of the subjects’ IQ or psychiatric history.
The authors used IQ as a marker of a concept called cognitive reserve, which refers to variation between people in their brain’s resilience to neuropathological damage.
Darwin just called it fitness but okay. Ignore evolution.
Or it could be the inverse genetic measure genetic load, where less is best.
The results showed that lower childhood IQ predicted an increased risk of a variety of adult mental disorders.
Imagine my shock.
“Lower childhood IQ predicted increased risk of schizophrenia, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. Individuals with lower childhood IQ also had more persistent depression and anxiety and were more likely to be diagnosed with two or more disorders in adulthood,” said lead author Karestan Koenen, assistant professor of society, human development, and health at HSPH.
Next post will focus on comorbids.
It’s ironically depressing reading.
No association was found between lower childhood IQ and substance dependence disorders, simple phobia, panic disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Sounds dodgy but okay.
The mechanism through which lower childhood IQ might lead to increased risk of adult anxiety disorders is not known,
that is a lie
the world doesn’t need low IQ labor anymore, especially in the First World
but the authors suggest some possible explanations.
Step 1. give them more money?
They write that lower childhood IQ might reveal a difference in brain health that makes an individual more vulnerable to certain mental disorders. Another possible mechanism is stress–individuals with lower childhood IQs are less equipped to deal with complex challenges of modern daily life, which may make them more vulnerable to developing mental disorders.
I won’t even.
The findings may be helpful in treating individuals with mental health disorders.
Hang on, if it’s implicitly caused by low IQ, it cannot be fixed.
It’s their parents’ fault (median IQ of the genetic parents, all else equal).
Why blame the kid?
“Lower childhood IQ was associated with greater severity of mental disorders including persistence over time and having two or more diagnoses at age 32,” said Koenen.
32 is young, they haven’t even hit middle-age yet when conditions skyrocket.
“Since individuals with persistent and multiple mental disorders are more likely to seek services, cognitive ability may be an important factor for clinicians to consider in treatment planning.
This is why IQ denialism is toxic. It isn’t everything but hey, it’s something!
When you’re planning about people, plural, it’s important!
For example, individuals with lower cognitive ability may find it harder to follow instructions and comply with treatment regimens.
How low are we talking?
By taking clients’ cognitive ability into account, clinicians may improve treatment outcome,” she said.
The results may also be helpful in prevention planning. “Educators and pediatricians should be aware that children with lower cognitive ability may be at greater risk of developing psychiatric disorders. Early detection and intervention aimed at ameliorating mental health problems in these children may prevent these problems from carrying over into adulthood,” said Koenen.
No no no, no no no and…. no.
I’m ragequitting this post and writing the next, I tried.
Credit where it’s due, I do feel sorry for the kids. You can’t choose your parents.
“http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/ – 84% more likely compared to “single-race” individuals (of all races). This other one claims 3.5x times, although their source is a YouTube video, so I’m sceptical lol. Wouldn’t surprise me if it was 3.5x higher if you compared to monoracial whites though, as opposed to the “single-race” stats in the first study which includes monoracial minorities.
Sad though. Hopefully there ain’t anyone here who’s ever considered suicide, although I suspect there might be some.
Of course, Wilkes McDermid is the obvious one who comes to mind, who listed wm/af as the cause of his death – apparently he counted 100 separate groups of 100 sets of Asian/white IR couples in London – the “best” result for Asian men being 6:94, the worst being 0:100 – if that ain’t getting fucked-over, I don’t know what is. In fact, other than the Asian tourists, I can’t remember ever seeing an Asian woman with an Asian man in London – christ, I barely even remember seeing an Asian man for that matter – makes me wonder if they simply refuse to go outside with the situation as bad as it is or get the fuck out of that city ASAP…
Also heard a relative of Vietnamese guy in London in his 20s also committed suicide, who I think was wm/af hapa. Doesn’t surprise me and I’d almost certainly guarentee he’d list all the reasons here as examples.
Fuck, all I know was I was horrified to see the situation in London at 18 – if I was like 8 years old and saw that? Wow, I’d have probably been traumatised for life and gone into deep-depression. Thing is, an Asian woman would NEVER go up, grab a child and shout “you’re worthless, you’re ugly, you’re unwanted, you’re inferior, you’re a small-dicked loser, you’re doomed to die alone” (etc etc), but yet that is EXACTLY the message they are sending out – someone tell me, how is a child growing up in that environment going to come to ANY other conclusion? Brutal doesn’t even come close to describing the situation Asian women have created for their own kids…
And sure, suicide, like the ER-types, are the ultimate extremes – thing is though, whereas some Asian women will say “oh, Elliot Rodgers was only a one-off…you always have some crazies out there”, the reality is, that for every 1 ER, there are 100,000 other kids out there who feel EXACTLY the same, yet just simmer away in silence. Sure, that study claims 34% of hapas have suffered from mental illness, though I’d imagine that is heavily skewed towards: wm/af children, as opposed to am/wf ones; males as opposed to females; kids living in low-Asian areas, as opposed to high-Asian areas. Christ, if you were an am/wf son living in an Asian enclave, I think your chance of depression would be effectively 0% – for a wm/af son in bumfuck, Ohio, I’d imagine the risk of depression could be upwards of 90%. In fact, it doesn’t amaze me that they might end up depressed, it would amaze me if somehow they didn’t…”
It really is about being trendy and falling for SJW propaganda.
“And yeah, what I found absolutely amazing was that when I was at Heathrow airport in London, I saw probably 30 wm/af couples per hour, with white guys mass-importing their Thai/Filipino/East Asian brides (mail-order whores, let’s be honest lol) – you know the weirdest thing though? 2 hours later, when the plane stopped-off in Paris, I noticed the same thing…white guys mass-importing 3rd world women who were their 3-in-1 prostitute/maid/cook, but you know what was amazing, rather than these 30 couples being wm/af…the women were BLACK and NOT Asian – effectively just proving that wm/af isn’t a genuine relationship, it is simply a social trend –
Spot the cuckface.
you know, afterall, if white guys keep seeing wm/af, if they’re bombarded with Filipina/Thai/Asian dating adverts online, if they are aware of the stereotypes associated with Asian women (easy, submissive, ‘know their place’ etc etc), then more white guys will think “hmm, I’ll go an get an Asian woman”, hence causing other white guys to see more wm/af and the trend continuing.
That’s an in-person IQ test for brainwashing.
Just like fashion trends really – if people see a lot of others wearing the ‘in’ brand, then they themselves will want to buy that same brand too. Seeing the contrast though, between the London/Paris airports was just truly amazing though…like a completely different world lol! Of course, ultimately it largely stems from the fact the French colonies, other than Vietnam, were generally in Africa, whereas the British colonies often tended to be in Asia…”
The question becomes suicide or genetic suicide.
Wouldn’t it be better to have no kids at all than ones with terrible lives and dating odds? Assuming White Europe will accept them when you couldn’t accept a white woman yourself is insane.
is one I already linked. Their conversation about it is interesting.
They have every right to be upset about something they didn’t choose.
Imagine if your parents chose your job! Less invasive to life quality than race.
Then there’s the sad truth of the matter.
Other study still up:
What are the odds the girls will turn SJW?
Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.
They tried to hide it and only made it stronger. Solid finding.
The study included information from 125 biracial Asian Americans from across the U.S., including 55 Filipino-Caucasians, 33 Chinese-Caucasians, 23 Japanese-Caucasians and 14 Vietnamese-Caucasians.
Weebs are always wrong.
Update: they didn’t mention this study but it belongs here:
Rates and patterns of substance use and violent behaviors among multiracial adolescents were examined and compared with 3 monoracial groups, European, African, and Asian Americans. The relationships between ethnic identity and the subjective experience of racial discrimination, substance use, and violent behavior were also examined. The authors found multiracial adolescents reporting higher rates of problem behaviors. Several significant relationships between ethnic identity and racial discrimination were found with these problem behaviors.
Wait, there’s more! I rarely paper binge these days.
“A Clearer Picture of Multiracial Substance Use: Rates and Correlates of Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Multiracial Adolescents and Adults”
U.S. NHPI, AIAN, and multiracial adolescents are disproportionately burdened by illicit substance use, depressed mood, and suicidality. Current alcohol and cigarette use may predispose these adolescents toward suicidality, offering potential pathways to alleviate suicide risk.”
“This article explores the relationship between a heightened awareness of race as a social construct and comfort in interracial relationships across varying levels of intimacy among multiracial and monoracial individuals. Study 1 finds that multiracial individuals express higher levels of comfort in intimate interracial relationships than monoracial White and minority individuals. Study 2 finds that belief in race as a social construction mediates the differences between monoracial and multiracial individuals in their comfort in intimate interracial relationships. Implications of these findings for interracial relationships are discussed.”
Eurasian kids, Eurasian-African grandkids.
You cannot say you were not warned.
When outbreeding depression becomes genetic suicide. If only we were warned in a timeless book somehow.
“A common stressor is when multiracial people are not allowed to self-identify as multiracial. Denying multiracial people the right to identify themselves as multiracial can be detrimental.”
Good luck raising the kid to call himself white.