Aged, post-Wall men when childless more likely to die young

and their r-select offspring, too, if they have them. Quantity over quality doesn’t work in the long run, see, so don’t worry about immigrants that much. Low fitness cannot win, long-term.
Mother Nature culls bachelors.

Slight repost for SEO. Nature, this year.

Impact of genetic risk score on the association between male childlessness and cardiovascular disease and mortality

Men need purpose of family or wither away. Believe no copes.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97733-2

Childless men are reported to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Information on inherited genetic risk for CVD has improved the predictive models. Presuming that childlessness is a proxy of infertility we aimed to investigate if childless men inherit more often genetic traits for CVD and if combining genetic and parenthood information improves predictive models for CVD morbidity and mortality. Data was sourced from a large prospective population-based cohort where genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated using two sets of either 27 (GRS 27) or 50 (GRS 50) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously found to be associated with CVD. Part of the participants (n = 2572 men) were randomly assigned to a sub-cohort with focus on CVD which served as an exploratory cohort. The obtained statistically significant results were tested in the remaining (confirmatory) part of the cohort (n = 9548 men). GRS distribution did not differ between childless men and fathers (p-values for interaction between 0.29 and 0.76). However, when using fathers with low GRS as reference high GRS was a strong predictor for CVD mortality, the HR (95% CI) increasing from 1.92 (1.10–3.36) for GRS 50 and 1.54 (0.87–2.75) for GRS 27 in fathers to 3.12 (1.39–7.04) for GRS50 and 3.73 (1.75–7.99) for GRS27 in childless men. The confirmatory analysis showed similar trend. Algorithms including paternal information and GRS were more predictive for CVD mortality at 5 and 10 years follow-ups when compared to algorithms including GRS only (AUC 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.92) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.84–0.90), and, AUC 0.81 (95% CI 0.75–0.87) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73–0.82), respectively). Combining information on parental status and GRS for CVD may improve the predictive power of risk algorithms in middle-aged men. Childless men and those with severe infertility problem may be an important target group for prevention of CVD.

The Wall literally kills men. It’s undeniable. The MGTOW types are an anti-natal death cult as much as SJWs, except spinsters live longer, actually.
There is no accounting for this but genetics, as we see in the premature mortality of children if they do have them.

OFFSPRING

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27927843/
Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality

Men who wait until postWall to have kids, tend to have dead kids. It isn’t just paternal age, it’s poor genetic quality or fitness.
Stop lying to men about this, they don’t have immortal sperm. No such thing. Don’t tell them to leave it too late while you hock them playa e-books.
So the kids they do manage to have will die early, this is also seen among the mixed with rare genetic conditions.

What is known already: Semen quality is an established predictor of men’s somatic health. We can gain a better understanding of possible genetic or environmental determinants of the infertility phenotype by exploring familial aggregation of childhood mortality in relatives of men with poor semen quality.

TLDR:

Get rekt, you’re already dead. So are your r-type kids.
This is why r-types evolved to have children as early as humanly possible, and as often. The high quality K strategy is genetically barred from them, no wonder they hate happy families, it’s like fat women hating thin ones. The kids don’t live long enough to act like a K, long-term. This is why fake Ks make me laugh and largely don’t concern me. You can’t cheat your own inferior genetic quality. Go ahead, have expensive medical bills for likely retarded or mentally ill kids, that will die before you get grandkids. See if I care.

The Lord works in mysterious ways. Or maybe you aren’t listening to Him.
The sins of the father…..

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

You say, ‘God stores away a man’s iniquity for his sons.’
Let God repay him so that he may know it.

“Prepare for his sons a place of slaughter
Because of the iniquity of their fathers.
They must not arise and take possession of the earth
And fill the face of the world with cities.”

Sounds like early mortality to me!

There are many studies on weak sperm and premature mortality in men, I’m surprised really. Nature has the gold standard one because I know they’ll try to cherrypick around it.
They never discuss real redpills like this, do they?

If something cut a childless woman’s lifespan in HALF, you’d be sure they’d talk about it.
CONSTANTLY.

Men are, at best, dying of a broken heart in the mid-30s, early-40s because they have no family, and you hear crickets from the con artists who don’t really care about men, only wish to profiteer from them.

It directly contradicts their pure copium that ALL men have magical sexy singleton 30s (as K-type high fitness men might exclusively*), despite going outside, touching some grass and seeing how many let themselves go into grotesque swamp monsters. It isn’t just the women. Speaking to some Americans, I attributed a full decade or two onto their claimed age. I don’t think they were lying. The GMO carbs and booze age them like shit. The diabeetus fairy sprinkles them with powdered sugar.

*but Ks don’t sleep around, so it’s redundant to be hot. Rs want to be Ks so badly but slut genes lose.

CVD is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US as well as in the European Union to a cost of hundreds of billion €, and responsible for 400,000 annual US deaths and 1.8 million EU deaths11,12,13. Therefore, improving CVD risk prediction and prevention is an important public health goal and is embedded in the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases in the WHO European Region for the time period 2016 to 202514.

This risk was most pronounced in childless men with high genetic risk scores having up to more than three times increased risk of CVD mortality, as compared to fathers with low GRS. Furthermore, we showed that adding information on paternal status to the GRS-based risk algorithm increases the predictive power for CVD mortality during 5- and 10-years follow-up.

Previously, by using data from a prospective cohort of 22,000 men with long follow-up from the same urban population, we were able to show that childlessness can be regarded as an independent risk marker for CVD along with other well-known risk factors2, an association previously reported by other authors4,26,27,28. In the current study we used a similar cohort from the same region of southern Sweden which provided genetic data and was specifically designed to study CVD risk. We were able to show the same effect of paternal status on CVD mortality estimates as previously published2. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study which evaluates the impact of established genetic risk scores for CVD on the association between parental status and the risk of CAD and CVD mortality.

Family size can be directly linked to the male fertility status29 and therefore male infertility is most likely overrepresented among childless men. Similarly, increased mortality and morbidity risk have been associated with impaired semen quality2 suggesting biological factors related to fertility to also play an important role for the risk of adverse health events in those men—association already established for women30.

The hypothesis of shared genetic traits for CVD and male infertility is based on the model proposed by Skakkebaek et al.18. It suggests a common mechanism, involving a combination of prenatal life exposures and adverse genetic factors to affect the future health of male fetuses making them more prone to develop subfertility as well as various diseases in adult life and to have shorter life span16,17,18,19. The mechanism suggests a primary testicular dysfunction including low testosterone—hypogonadism—as a possible mediator for the aforementioned risks31,32. Since up to 15% of the genome is directly involved in the physiology of reproduction16, disruption of non-reproductive, including metabolic, pathways likely impacts reproductive function and vice versa. However, the lack of interaction between parental status and inherited genetic risk for CVD reported by us suggests independent mechanisms when using childlessness as proxy for infertility.

Our study has several strengths but also some limitations. Comprehensive information from Swedish national registries allows for precise information on date and cause of death, emigration, disease diagnosis and represents men from all socioeconomic backgrounds. The meticulous data collection at baseline provides an opportunity to adjust for a large number of well-known risk factors for CVD. Furthermore, the genetic scores used in the analysis were previously verified as a risk factor using data from more than 55,000 individuals15, thus making it a reliable factor in risk estimation.

The robustness of our findings is underlined by confirmation of the findings based on MDC-CVC sub-cohort in the analysis of data from the remaining MDC subjects. In the latter analysis some additional GRS 27 subgroups showed statistically significantly increased CAD HRs, probably due to larger sample size.

therefore the risk of our cohort to reflect voluntary childlessness is low.

TLDR: Genetic r.

Solution? Simple. Compel hot people to breed like military service and ban the ugly.

Deformed sperm sub-fertility ‘baffles’ researchers

I wonder what these guys recently all had in common?
I WONDER. IF ONLY SOMEBODY HAD PREDICTED THIS.

No date on this:

What did I say? Depopulation shots, if I were to design them, would target overall fertility in women, and mutate the sperm in the men.

Nobody was checking the men, I’ve been blowing this whistle all year.

“All participants have never suffered from infertility and have not been treated for it. The semen samples were tested for parameters and immune factors.”

Did they have herp? That causes infertility in men. It’s hugely covered up though.

I’ve posted about it.

These guys were dead, so let’s consider this a win for natural selection. Maybe sub-fertility in general predicts premature mortality for men? (see below, checked) HOWEVER: If disease-ridden manwhores are most likely to die of coof, I’ll personally send a thank you letter to Pfizer.

THE WAGES OF SIN ARE STILL DEATH. Das the real redpill, and white.

Thus, we were able to observe the disruption of sperm production, which can be partially explained by the result of an increased immune response from the testes.

Inflammation? Like from modRNA?

In addition to this, autoimmune inflammation of the testicles occurred in some COVID-19 patients.

Specifically WHAT PERCENTAGE had received a modRNA injection of any variety?

NO data? Seriously? You believe that? If they had pure blood, they’d be screeching told ya so.

from June 25th

Is it the disease or symptoms of a reaction to the jabs?

The current study observed a significant impact on male fertility and pathological changes in male gonads that might impact healthy reproductive well-being in male COVID-19 patients in the long-term. It is connected with impaired spermatogenesis with low sperm count, inflammatory responses in the testes and epididymis, and altered markers of seminal immunity indicating impaired immunity due to COVID-19 disease.

Why not tell us the percentages?

Research funded by China, this is a cover-up.

Impaired human spermatogenesis and delayed sperm maturation may be the result of an immune response in the testes and epididymis of COVID-19 patients, these factors are vital and determinant for healthy male fertility. It requires further care and support of males infected with SARS-CoV-2. It may indicate an increase in male infertility as a consequence.

Or immune response to the clot shots, since it impaired the tubes, which viruses don’t actually do?

“COVID-19 affects men more than women compared to its original form. SARS-CoV-2 can stay in human bodies longer than SARS-CoV. Its clinical characteristics are similar to SARS, but the male reproductive system is seriously affected by it. The male reproductive system is vulnerable to viral infections, and previous viral epidemics had documented varying impacts on male reproductive functions.

Depop by design.

There is substantial recorded evidence that the male reproductive system is vulnerable to viral infections like MUMPS, ZIKA, Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Human papillomavirus (HPV), Herpes, EBOLA.

It’s a bioweapon. Chinese ball bleach. But let them marry into your family, sure.

As such, the manosphere, as primary vectors of birth-rate killing disease, should be banned from any traditional society. Banishment is holy. God did it.
A lot of hebe/pedo guys you’d think are Chads, like Henry Cavill, are mostly infertile (sub-fertile) due to their HPV, herp, etc. Watch that scandal break, the wages of sin…. HC had a John Doe case in Canada for failing to inform a woman prior to sex that he had herp and passing it on, ruining her fertility. Due to the medical damage, she won because they are spreading infertility via their STDs, we didn’t lynch cads without just cause. Patriarchy was right. Soon it’ll be prosecuted as rape by fraud, like a tranny lying to a man. Here here.

re epididymis

The clot shot will target the epithelial cells in it.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4664737/

The mammalian epididymis is a highly specialized region of the male reproductive tract that is lined with a continuous layer of epithelial cells that display a remarkable level of regionalized secretory and absorptive activity. The luminal environment created by this combined secretory and absorptive activity is directly responsible for promoting the functional maturation of spermatozoa and their maintenance in a quiescent and viable state prior to ejaculation. This study was designed to identify the complement of microRNAs (miRNAs) that are expressed within the mouse epididymal epithelial cells and the maturing populations of spermatozoa. Through the use of Next Generation Sequencing technology we have demonstrated that both epididymal epithelial cells and spermatozoa harbour a complex repertoire of miRNAs that have substantially different expression profiles along the length of the tract. These data, deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with the accession numbers GSE70197 and GSE70198, afford valuable insight into the posttranscriptional control of gene expression within the epididymis and provide the first evidence for the dynamic transformation of the miRNA content of maturing sperm cells. Ultimately such information promises to inform our understanding of the aetiology of male infertility. Herein we provide a detailed description of the methodology used to generate these important data.

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/8/1273

It applies to sperm in other mammals too.

Mutant sperm causes miscarriages.

https://www.verywellfamily.com/can-problems-in-sperm-cause-miscarriage-2371837

So the side effect of women miscarrying may not have been THEIR clot shot.

But some research over the past decade suggests that this might not always be the case. Some cases of recurrent miscarriages seem to involve the father having a high incidence of abnormal chromosomes in his sperm.

There aren’t any real estimates for how frequently the sperm is a factor in recurrent miscarriages, and chromosome problems in sperm aren’t believed to be a major cause of repeat losses. It does seem to be a possibility—especially in men whose sperm showed abnormal morphology or other markers of low fertility.

Sperm cannot repair cell damage like other cells in the body and this is a leading cause of male infertility. The damage also affects the DNA structure within the sperm and if it fertilizes an egg, this can potentially lead to miscarriage.

One study compared couples who experienced multiple miscarriages to couples with infertile men and fertile men. The result is that the sperm involved in the miscarriages was more likely to have signs of fragmentation at nearly the same rate as that of the infertile men.

TLDR: Stop blaming the women.

These sorts of results suggest that the correlation between SDF and fertility—both the inability to conceive and miscarriages—can be a factor. However, researchers are cautious to note that SDF alone cannot predict a couple’s risk of miscarriage.

Miscarriage is the woman’s body rejecting him because her mind was too dumb to. Like female weebs.

Unhealthy choices can lead to the many factors that decrease the chances of a successful pregnancy. This includes decreased sperm mobility and vitality, lower sperm counts, and abnormal morphology (the size and shape of sperm). It can also lead to physical damage. Any damage to sperm can cause fertility problems and, if an egg is fertilized, it may also lead to a miscarriage.

Test men early. No reason not to.

Don’t wait until miscarriage number 3.

Some physicians may recommend that men undergo tests for sperm quality when no other cause for recurrent miscarriages is found. The standard test is a sperm analysis, which looks at the shape, mobility, and sperm count in the sample.

Or test them FIRST prior to the trauma that’s 100% preventable by them jizzing in a cup?
The trauma that puts women off trying more?

Childless men more likely to die, as I suspected.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97733-2

Manosphere get rekt.

It’s likely the sperm mutation is also affecting the brain by similar disease vectors like herp, causing childlessness but also early death. Like the rats attracted to cats.

They sense their low quality and hence, don’t bother to invest. Self-selection of genetic suicide. This is why the Spartans had a bachelor tax, it was a tax on the genetic dregs. All healthy men have a paternal instinct.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27927843/

Men who wait until post-Wall to have kids, tend to have dead kids.

Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality

So the kids they do have will die early, this is also seen among the mixed with rare genetic conditions.

What is known already: Semen quality is an established predictor of men’s somatic health. We can gain a better understanding of possible genetic or environmental determinants of the infertility phenotype by exploring familial aggregation of childhood mortality in relatives of men with poor semen quality.

Wider implications of the findings: We are not the first study to show a relationship between fertility and CMs. Children conceived through ART may be at higher risk of birth defects, however it is not known if the relationship is causal or if there is some underlying factor linking infertility and birth outcomes. This study provides further evidence that the increased risk of congenital birth defects may not be due to the ART, but rather genetic or environmental factors that link the two outcomes. We encourage further research in order to confirm a relationship between semen quality and increased risk for CM.

R-type children, like the fathers, age like shit.

MRAs being traitors again

They claim to believe in evolution, then pull this shit. Leave the country if you hate it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/high-court-asked-to-review-men-only-draft-registration-law/ar-AAKLdpK?ocid=msedgntp

“Mar, who represents the National Coalition For Men”

there it is, hardly an American name is it?

“and two individual men challenging the law”

let’s see names and faces of the gamma bitches who want women to die for them while they sit high and pretty as Secret Kings

draft those three and only those three

NO more male supremacy propaganda if you’re too weak to even sign up for a draft you claim doesn’t matter.

No more muh Patriarchy bullshit. You are males, not men. Men fight for what they believe in, and not just through a keyboard. You are not a real man by living to age 18.

Women don’t have the upper body strength to serve, end of story. Internal organs are different too, from the spine structure to the lung capacity. Women literally do not have military endurance. They also make great POWs, especially for rape, and if nuked, the infertility means winning the war cannot happen. Since the group is genetically dead. No instinct to protect their women > low T. Cowards like this were the reason we kicked boys out of the tribe at puberty, to let nature finish them off if they were yellow little snakes.

DO YOU WANT GENDER ROLES OR NOT?

NO WAH WAH WAH IT’S HARD. DYING IN BATTLE IS LESS PROBABLE THAN MATERNAL MORTALITY IN AMERICA, WHICH HAS GONE WAY WAY UP.

MRAs are just anti-white female, in the same way SJWs are anti-white male. It’s all anti-white and literally most white people are the women, sorry to tell ya.

Yet more genocidal mewling. Cultural Marxism claims everyone is biologically the same. Christianity doesn’t dispute this biological difference used by evolution/chromosomes, but adds God gave us equal yoking in spiritual value. So it’s anti-Christ, too.

Hillary Clinton wanted to pass this. Should tell you.

Starting to think God made women bear children because many men would’ve been too cowardly and opted out, making us go dodo. Men are fonder of abortion in surveys, not wanting to ban it in case god forbid they’re held responsible for once in their lives.

“If the court agrees to hear the case, it wouldn’t be deciding whether women have to register, just whether the current system is constitutional. If it isn’t, then it would then be up to Congress to decide how to respond, either by passing a law requiring everyone to register or deciding registration is no longer necessary.”

So it’s an offshoot of tranny stuff. Great.

“The issue of who has to register for the draft has been to the court before. In 1981, the court voted 6-3 to uphold the men-only registration requirement. At the time, the decision was something of an outlier because the court was regularly invalidating gender-based distinctions in cases about other areas of the law. Many of those cases were brought by the founding director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who became a justice in 1993.”

Unpatriotic scum gonna be unpatriotic. You’re on Ginsburg’s side of history.

Women are the national security, securing its literal biological future.

“The case about the draft is National Coalition For Men v. Selective Service System, 20-928.”

Another case for womb envy.

Even the Vikings are cucked.

Aging fathers, ugly kids

That’s one solid explanation for why people are generally uglier nowadays, even the healthy weight.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311035

Paternal age negatively predicts offspring physical attractiveness in two, large, nationally representative datasets

Freeze your sperm at 18 for optimum freshness.

Effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness is investigated in two datasets.

Various covariates are utilized.

Significant negative effects are found in both datasets.

Effects are independent of birth order.

Findings consistent with paternal age as a source of new mutations in offspring.

Abstract

The effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness has recently been investigated. Negative effects are predicted as paternal age is a strong proxy for the numbers of common de novo mutations found in the genomes of offspring. As an indicator of underlying genetic quality or fitness, offspring attractiveness should decrease as paternal age increases, evidencing the fitness-reducing effects of these mutations.

That’s a hard rectal red pill.

I’m sure the manosphere will try its hardest to ignore like the dead and defective babies.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

The problem is, you think you have time.

Thus far results are mixed, with one study finding the predicted effect, and a second smaller study finding the opposite. Here the effect is investigated using two large and representative datasets (Add Health and NCDS),

holy Jesus a sound method

I almost fell off my high horse

both of which contain data on physical attractiveness and paternal age.

Validity! Validity! My queendom for some statistical validity!

The effect is present in both datasets, even after controlling for maternal age at subject’s birth, age of offspring, sex, race, parental and offspring (in the case of Add Health) socio-economic characteristics, parental age at first marriage (in the case of Add Health) and birth order.

The confound control is practically orgasmic, I can’t wait to see how they mansplain this one away.

That is perfect method. But it triggers butthurts and their precious feefees are hurt by the mere implication that degenerate older dads are bad for their kid’s health. Because all those upper crust respectable 1950s dads were like “60 is the new 20 lol!” Who gives a shit if your kids need you past high school? You got more priceless clubbing times you don’t remember, that’s what really matters. Not seeing your grandkids.

Class, race, sex, age at marriage, birth order, maternal age, offspring age – there’s literally nothing else to control for. Nothing. It’s flawless.

THESE. ARE. THE. STUDIES. WE. NEED.

Logically, since women are born with most of their eggs, there wouldn’t be a maternal effect. It isn’t constantly replenishing like the male gamete. Cell division’s a bitch. Male lifestyle for all his years prior

https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/dads-smoking-before-conception-harms-kids/

affects the child at conception (and even which sperm is conceived) far more than the details of pregnancy (minus pollutants it’s pretty much the same as in ancient times, the womb is not a new environment).

Maybe add child health although those studies already exist to cross-reference with attractiveness?

As in, are the girls more womanly as adults in WHR and the boys have more manly frames (broad shoulders, narrow waist, which should be a metric of its own)? Or less gender typical? Even androgynous, or fully gender-atypical?

Do younger or older fathers produce better-looking kids in the gendered sense?

[We can tell by looking at old photos but let’s pretend.]

Give me a time machine, please. The ugly wigger types hurt my eyes.

[I have also noted mannish looking sisters tend to be the older, “ugly” sister of two -coughs Beatrice- and the girly looking brothers tend to be the younger, usually gay one. Cannot unsee.]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682

e.g.

“In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.”

The beard can also be a sign of poor grade genes e.g. savages, wolf man. Overall bone structure uber alles.

Maybe factor in sexual activity of the father prior to conception? Especially partner count and STDs. STDs are known to harm attractiveness in the host [coughs David Beckham, most of Hollywood] so why not the offspring’s?

Back to the top study:

The apparent robustness of the effect to different operationalizations of attractiveness suggests high generalizability, however the results must be interpreted with caution, as controls for parental levels of attractiveness were indirect only in the present study.

aka please don’t sue us but you know it’s true

But you can wait forever because the Jews said so!

Say, who owns all the biotech and IVF companies?

https://www.fertilitybridge.com/blog/2018/4/11/battleforivfmarketwallstreetvsprivatepractice

[chuckles in Israel shekels]

https://hmcisrael.com/specialty/ivf-israel/

“According to statistics, around 20% of couples wishing to conceive are faced with certain obstacles that inhibit a successful pregnancy.

Fertility Treatment is one of the most prioritized fields of medicine in Israel.”

Sure, you can wait for decades! Also, cut the kid when they’re born!

We need more future little Viagra users.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/2648044

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7752-female-genital-mutilation-can-cause-infertility/

Does Circumcision Decrease the Fertility of Sperm in the Male?

“However, birth rates are much higher in countries where the men are predominantly uncircumcised.”

There is no question that an uncircumcised man has a cooler penis than a circumcised man in the flaccid state. For some reason, removal of the foreskin is the reason for this. There seems to be some sort of temperature sensor in the foreskin that may control penile temperature. Removing the foreskin gets rid of this sensor.

It only takes a few temperature degrees of difference to damage sperm. As the penis is in close proximity to the testicles, it’s quite likely that a cooler penis would help keep the testicles cooler (Remember that men are more potent in the colder months of the year). Under these condition, if the testicles got too cold, they can always be retracted closer to the body.

Almost like God gave men a prepuce solely for this evolutionary function in reproduction.

…Now consider this: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have the same penis temperature on full erection, as we stated earlier in this article. So, clearly, there is a specific reason why a natural-uncircumcised penis remains at a cooler temperature during the flaccid state. When the penis is erect it is no longer in close proximity with the testicles, so penile temperature should not affect the testicular temperature at this phase (be the penis circumcised or uncircumcised).

Upon orgasm, the penis tends to retract more into the pelvis (at least with my experience). Due to the friction and increased blood flow that occurred during the sexual act, it makes sense that the penis will have an increase in temperature in a flaccid state post-sex than in a flaccid state previous to the sexual act. Could this retraction be another mechanism for the “heated” penis to steer clear of the testicles?

Go there, science.

Circumcision and Male Fertility: Is There a Link?

Scientists have recently concluded that circumcision can help with infertility in males suffering from two very specific diseases.

So… not generalizable.

Some woman perv studies after all that penis talk.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000269

Women’s faces and voices may be cues to their reproductive potential. If so, then individual differences in indices of female fecundity and residual reproductive value, such as hormonal profiles, body composition, and age, should be associated with women’s facial and vocal attractiveness to men. However, previous research on these associations is sparse, has rendered mixed results, and is limited to Western samples. The current study therefore explored relationships between correlates of reproductive capability (testosterone levels, age, and body mass index [BMI]) and facial and vocal attractiveness in women from industrial and foraging societies. Women’s facial and vocal attractiveness was associated with each of these indicators in at least one of the two samples. The patterns of these associations suggest that women’s faces and voices provide cues to both common and unique components of reproductive potential and help explain the evolution of men’s mating preferences.

Lesson: Avoid the manjaw.

Women change their vocal pitch all the time though. European women are taught to make it lower at school (speak up = louder, lower pitch), Asians try to make it higher. The key is how they sound when hysterically upset. That’s their true level. Europeans go up, Asians down.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000475

Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history—number of children and pregnancies—in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not.

So partnered, married women. Not single ones.

Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features—facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.

Menopause is not the face equalizer you think.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816302318

African and European perception of African female attractiveness

Dare you to do the same study with every race judging every other.

Majority of research on attractiveness is restricted to faces of European origin. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across communities due to variations in both facial morphology and local standards of beauty. We investigated the relative contribution of four facial markers of attractiveness based on 101 female facial portraits (standardized, non-manipulated) from Cameroon and Namibia, which were assessed by local male raters and by raters from a distant European population, the Czech Republic. Images from Cameroon include only women of Bantu origin, while Namibians are represented by women of both Bantu (Owambo/Herero) and Nama origin. While controlling for age and BMI, we explored the relationship between female attractiveness and a set of facial traits: fluctuating asymmetry, averageness, shape sexual dimorphism, and skin color (rated and measured in CIELab color space).

In the Cameroonian sample, local male raters favored lighter-skinned female faces with morphology closer to average. The attractiveness of Nama women as rated by Nama men positively correlated with lighter complexion, but this did not extend to rating by Cameroonian men. The attractiveness of Namibian Owambo/Herero women was positively associated with facial femininity and lighter complexion when judged by both Cameroonian and Nama male raters. In all samples, the attractiveness as rated by Czech men was predicted by age and BMI, but not by skin color. We found no significant association between attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry in any of the tested samples. When controlling for age, the effect of skin color on attractiveness turned to be non-significant in the Owambo/Herrero and Nama sample, but remained significant in the Cameroonian sample. Variations in skin color thus represent an important factor of African female attractiveness within the African context, but they do not seem to affect judgements made by European raters.

They don’t want any of them.

Sensitivity to some facial markers of female attractiveness thus seems to be restricted to regional populations and/or constrained by shared ethnicity.

Paler women have more oestrogen. So duh.

Women reject old guys who’d give them dead or ugly kids:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816301283

“This finding is consistent with men’s stated preference for young, fertile women in mating and suggests that the typical pattern is generated by women’s limiting role in mating.”

aka their gender role

“older men tend to marry older women, including those who are peri- and post-menopausal”

TIL Korea is so degenerate it has slave markets. Ooof.

So much for the myth that young women have the hots for them. Yeah, I’m sure the Jap schoolgirl came onto you, right perv?

Deadbeats are the end of the West:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816303671

Research in evolutionary psychology, and life history theory in particular, has yielded important insights into the developmental processes that underpin variation in growth, psychological functioning, and behavioral outcomes across individuals. Yet, there are methodological concerns that limit the ability to draw causal inferences about human development and psychological functioning within a life history framework. The current study used a simulation-based modeling approach to estimate the degree of genetic confounding in tests of a well-researched life history hypothesis: that father absence (X) is associated with earlier age at menarche (Y). The results demonstrate that the genetic correlation between X and Y can confound the phenotypic association between the two variables, even if the genetic correlation is small—suggesting that failure to control for the genetic correlation between X and Y could produce a spurious phenotypic correlation. We discuss the implications of these results for research on human life history, and highlight the utility of incorporating genetically sensitive tests into future life history research.

I don’t think debtor’s prisons will come back – but if you breed it, you should feed it. I think the abandoned women that existed since Biblical times will just hire bounty hunters to shoot the first family deserter for a share of his life insurance policy.

Patriarchs everywhere would rejoice at culling the cads. The women get a widow’s pension.

Everyone wins. Hey, you said “until death do us part”. Men used to die by their oaths.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381400052X

I have noticed that immigrant men have a higher pitch than their non-immigrant relatives.

Maybe the act of immigration impairs masculinity?

Low male voice pitch may communicate potential benefits for offspring in the form of heritable health and/or dominance, whereas access to resources may be indicated by correlates of socioeconomic status, such as sociolinguistic features. Here, we examine if voice pitch and social dialect influence women’s perceptions of men’s socioeconomic status and attractiveness. In Study 1, women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices.

A lot of PUAs get shot down for 1. being brown and feeling entitled to a white woman, the lowest miscegenation group also further sickened by repeated forced “refugee” interactions and 2. having a high pitch voice and effete face compared to their national relatives. Compare within the white race, the “Latin lover” in Italy versus Italian immigrants raised and living in London, who sound like cartoon chipmunks by comparison.

Yes, we notice.

No, you can’t change it. We notice.

Same applies to white men who moved South so it appears to be immigration. Either being an immigrant or the act itself makes a man less manly. Most obviously, torso body fat deposition like a woman of their group and the sisters become like the men at home, more athletic.

In Study 2, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness.

It isn’t the money, it’s the genes.

Good genes, good brains, good money. Fixating on the money is what ugly guys do – Muslim prince to Jewish media mogul.

We also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men’s voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status.

Capacity to protect. Not a desk jockey. The middle-class is effeminate. They want army. No cowards.

Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status.

Women know quality, really? Almost like our lives depend on it.

Finally, women’s own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch.

Plenty of men chose to marry down to get a looker out of their genetic league, hypergamy.

Erotic capital is worth it, as you can tell by the fertility study above, even post-menopausal they’re better-looking.

Hence, women’s preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women’s preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch.

Women…. making…. mate choices?

mutation load is important?

 

MGTOW roast

The funniest thing is that the standards have never been lower in human history.

If women shave, so can you.

If you add what these guys spend on their hobbies, it’s roughly equivalent to what self-improvement costs, and women pay more for it.

If you have to tell a guy to wear a deodorant (a proper one) then is he really an adult?

Comic: the illusion of choice

You don’t have to hate the opposite sex to be an adult. Just be a grown-up without blaming half of your society, like everyone else manages to do.

The family you make is only bad if you made it bad with poor selection, you anti-natal nitwits.

21st Century Psychology: A Reference Handbook

High IQ people who reject parenthood are incredibly spiteful, actually. I admire it.

“You don’t deserve my genes”, sneer the Newtons and the Teslas.

Video: A critique of more PUA bitch fights

More drama?

MORE?

Is drama how they make money at this point?

[They are painfully middle-class. God forbid we turn a child of divorce down!]

“The world is a complicated place”.

Looking at the world but never actually at themselves, just surface level stuff.

He’s spot on.

“They depend on this degenerate society”.

They lie about rape law blatantly, I’ve compared their claims to it.

Accusations are presumed true when there was sexual contact. Having sex is something adults do, if you’re not mature enough for consequences, don’t.

It’s ghetto romance for non-blacks. It’s ultimately high time preference and thus, destructive in the long run.

They have their own SATC Have It All mythos including somehow not disgusting a virgin enough to marry her.

They’re not against birth control…”

That tells you all you need to know. It’s the trad test.

Unmarried people shouldn’t get contraception, why do you need it?

[Medical conditions are uncommon].

Also, assuming all women are on the Pill is stupid, no wonder they get women pregnant that way. Would they talk to a girl if they knew she wasn’t on it? Doubtful.

You can’t reduce the abortion rate while the Pill is used as the sole contraceptive for those women, it fails all the time statistically.

The “player” burnout and rising drug-resistant ST disease alone show it’s bad for the individual men. Live a lifelong orgy like a gay man, get all the same medical issues. Wages of sin. They also visit hookers (encourage it!) but don’t think of HIV risk nor STD-caused birth defects if they do conceive a child. For the vain, they aren’t told STDs ruin your looks.

Like your gravestone will include a notch count and future generations (hell, Gen Z) won’t be repulsed. I like to think men are worth more than their depth of depravity. They encourage men to take porn-star level risks with their health by having bareback anal. Yep, can you tell there’s a gay influence? But gay sex preference doesn’t make them gay, apparently….

They seem to many just competitive sex addicts or compulsive liars who need to feel a sense of online belonging to deal with childhood-rooted emotional abandonment issues.

Generally, they’re exploiting their own sex (they believe in muh 4 hour work week*, come on!) while complaining when other men and women do the same. Surely it’s don’t hate the player, hate the game? The SJWs are working in the same society they have a ‘blogging’ job in.

However, many PUAs as clients or readers are non-whites trying to use and abuse white women, this sexual terrorism angle makes a lot more sense.

Including why it doesn’t work.

They actually don’t believe in leagues.

The guys calling themselves alpha – not a league, apparently!

*The guy had rich parents and went to a brat school. He’s not average.

Sexual Jedi larping. When they can multiple orgasm as dudes, they might be worth listening to.

comment

If PUA’s put as much effort into improving their lives as they do improving their notch counts, they would be rich and happy men.

Bold to assume they don’t have mental issues.

Have you read their rape fantasies? (Obviously such a person could never be a rapist).

America’s stop hitting yourself

The logic seems to be: Women can’t oppress me, if I oppress them first. How is that going away? The lampreys on MGTOW have utterly ruined it. Who actually supports rapists and murderers without mental issues themselves?

The characteristic of revenge fantasies is that they never actually work.

Logically, if they did keep all 100% of women under male control, all women would be able to renounce all forms of legal responsibility to the man in charge of them. It used to be that way in some places that if women ran up massive credit debt, her husband would be automatically expected to pay. If a woman broke the law, her husband would be expected to provide her alibi or, sometimes, be blamed for forcing her to do it – and be punished in her place. You really want total responsibilities over all those idiotic messes? REALLY. Even SJWs don’t want to be held accountable for what men do. They also want women controlled for life but believe women have expiry dates… need I mention how impractical that is? You can’t drop a responsibility. This is like the people who take a commitment (e.g. marriage) then complain it’s limiting…. The men against marriage would be forcing themselves into a de facto marriage of statistically older (longer lifespan) women. They also wouldn’t be getting sex either, consent still exists. Plus they’d have a recession economy, since half the workforce is gone and never has to work again (sounds nice).

Many of their economic woes are caused by globalization.

They blame the West instead of the East. That is irrational. The propaganda is about the West because it isn’t the West, we were doing well until the rise of Asia stealing our production and student places (most women in top Western universities are Asian, in on forged transcripts, they never mention this).

Mostly, it’s immigration.

If you showed the happy 50s husband the MGTOW posts online they’d probably tell you it was a mental problem. It does share similarities with borderline personality (assuming all people hate you, insecurity, flashy purchases, assuming all people will take things from you and abandon you eventually, feeling out of place).

Hating women (okay, distrusting is visible) so much they deny their own gender role (and thus, power).

from their own files


Do they cut off their nose to spite their face, or their dick to spite SJWs?

You don’t want to pay income tax but want women to pay it?

You don’t want to pay child support but expect mothers to live off air?

You don’t want to fund schools if you don’t have children (that one is fair).

You don’t want men to protect women but refuse the death penalty for the worst criminals? How else do we get rid of them?

You want socialism (the Pill, abortions, STD shots) without the pricetag, seriously? Why not crawl back into your mother’s womb at this point? You don’t want to be an adult. If disabled people can be responsible and productive, what’s your excuse?

Apparently being our gender role oppressed them first. Somehow. Women oppressed them by needing to be provided for, due to the choice to be the baby-carrying and physically weaker sex. Because we choose those, we choose our sex apparently and fuck Darwin, “man up” is apparently hate speech.

Asking an adult male to act like a responsible man is now “sexism”, according to these guys.

(Why do you think a man cannot be a responsible adult without being married ? HMMM?)

Are your parents pushing you to get married? Diddums, you think that doesn’t happen to women?

Are your parents pushing you to have kids? That one REALLY happens more to women. By an order of magnitude.

Is nobody allowed to criticize baby, for fearing he feel SHAME?

Why can’t we shame men who deserve it? They shame women all the time. Shame is good. It makes people question immorality.

If you’re so immoral that shame works, that’s called a conscience and you should listen to it.

Because funding the mother of your children is evil but foisting them on an expensive nanny is good parenting. Studies be damned.

Can I point out the obvious?

If men don’t want to be men – that might explain why women don’t want them.

If we wanted girly men, we’d be lesbians?

A man is not his car or cologne, that would be sexist and dehumanizing. Replacing dignity and masculinity with material possessions and arrogant bragging just puts women off. The good women. Brands are telling you you need to buy stuff to impress women. Is money all they have to offer as a person? How did that work before credit cards?

Oh yeah, men gave the one thing women couldn’t provide for themselves. Men were manly.

If you want to be a metrosexual man, fine. You can’t change biology to make women get the hots for it. This is like fat acceptance but for pajama boys.

“Why can’t the woman pay me paternity leave?”

Because you didn’t give birth. If you gave birth, one day, we’d support you 100%. However, in reality, men cannot give birth, whatever the BBC says. Maternity leave happens after the birth to medically recover from the worst of it (really it takes about a year biologically).

“Why are women congratulated for conceiving?”

Because it’s a medical phenomena that happens inside their body. 

Are they really this dumb? [yes]

They continue to grow and support life itself, that’s impressive. They’ll also have to give birth, which you won’t.

Most of their complaints can be answered with: well, you don’t have to.

Women who choose not to have children still see pregnancy test adverts. They aren’t bitching about it.

Spinsters see marriage programmes on TV. Where is their forum bitching?

Society doesn’t stop because of Princess.

They sound transgender, with all this talk about the ‘evils’ of gender roles and being fluid in their societal duties.

You’re either a man or you’re not. This isn’t hard.

Don’t they get this? I think many of them just have such a low IQ they think the basics of adult living are a huge accomplishment. Women should scatter rose petals at their feet for… not having a criminal record and other things that are… normal.

They want to be spoiled but they aren’t even gay.

Men do the spoiling. Get a boyfriend, let him spoil you. Why do you think men get a sex change? They want a sugar daddy, they need to look female.

Women do provide for men but not the maternal succour they try to demand. Women are maternal to children, not adults and especially not sexual partners. It’s creepy. To be that needy as an adult, just go get it from your actual mother. You will never find a sexy mother replacement. It’s irreconcilable. Women respect (and are attracted to) adults.

(They also won’t find a new one every decade as they age. They think they don’t age.)

Yeah, demanding things from women they cannot biologically (are not evolved to) provide is a recipe for failure.

You can’t blame that on women, broflake.

I deserve this and this and this…” is bullshit in entitled women and men!

You deserve nothing and respect has to be earned. They don’t even respect themselves.

If I hated American men and wanted their legacy to die out, I’d convince them women are like the Jewish Lilith and never to marry or have kids (both of which extend male lifespan and joy).

Males commit more suicide because most of those suicides are bachelors.

Being single (bachelor) is the biggest suicide risk factor for men.
https://psychcentral.com/news/2013/06/11/mens-suicide-rate-is-3-times-that-of-women/55897.html
Almost like they evolved to have a spouse?

ding ding we have a winning study, they’ll never look into it

admitting their lifestyle is medically bad for them would require self-critique

(single women by contrast live longer, especially nuns or the celibate women)

asking happily married men how they did it would require change

Men are also at risk once they are hit by the reality of aging in the 50s. Men young enough to be their children outcompete them.
I’m sure that’s a coincidence. It can’t be regret, right players? There’s no such thing as player burnout, is there?

Men can have children any time they like, sperm doesn’t accumulate mutations year on year, does it? [does]

 

Don’t get me started on the narcissists who feel entitled to sex with women ….without the women part. Well, if you encounter any human socially, you’re bound to expect problems from that. The original MGTOW was quite brilliant in forsaking women and even dating them altogether. Fucking women causes 99% of women “problems”, you signed up for it. Nobody feels sorry for somebody that stupid.