What the middle class allows will spread to everyone else.
What the middle class allows will spread to everyone else.
Alt title: men rejecting their gender role (then blaming women).
“More nuanced and incisive rebuttals, such as Edward Feser’s The Last Superstition and David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions, somehow never quite achieved the same recognition.”
“The questions and debates engaged in by the new atheists were often reductive, emotionalized and glib, but one does have to grant that they at least tackled the great questions of faith in their way.”
All redditfags do is strawman and pretend to be House on social questions while their own lives are miserable bachelorhoods full of porn and video games. It’s like church ladies self-congratulating.
Yeah, in spite of mathematical certainty, they’re all 130+ and can’t spell or compose a sentence for shit. O.K.
The only way they feel good about themselves is crusaderism, finding a “sinner” and making them feel bad or stressed e.g. Christians.
“Its supporters soon tired of tedious and repetitive debates,
with their navel
and they began to argue with each other about social justice and political correctness.”
And failed, clue.
Nothing they say is original. They’re multicultural monstrosities.
“The answer lies in the grey zone between believers and atheists.
If you want to find the real wolf steering sheep away from the flock, look not to fedora-bedecked atheists, but to your average apatheist.”
No, hedonist. They pay lip service to virtue to continue a life of vice, massive cognitive dissonance.
You are not special, broflakes. This is not a special thing worthy of a snowflake term.
e.g. they will say all men should be married, and refuse to get married. Idiots.
They will say all men do better in the military and call the draft “sexist” (like evolution didn’t happen).
Women are weak but should magically overpower any male attacker with kung fu grip (but hitting a man is sexist).
They will know about atheist sub-fertility and refuse to be religious because they think it’s beneath them, a status signal, and again, they’re avoiding patriarchal standards i.e. no manwhoring, no carousing, no drugs, no lechery, actual standards of historical masculine virtue.
They don’t want to grow up or can’t (emotionally regressed). Peter Pan spent all his time “having fun” and dodging responsibility.
The idea of being a gentleman or “respectable” is something they dismiss out of hand with another mis-label, cuck.
No, a cuck is someone who rejects tradition and history in their own life while verbally going on (and on and on…) about its importance, they’re cuckservatives hoping to freeload off the backs of real men’s hard work. For thee but not for me. They’re worthless humans, if they won’t contribute they should emigrate. They’d actually take a class on Penis Studies (Man Studies) because they’re so mind-numbingly boring (predictable, all on the same diet, same clothes, same haircut, same reading material across borders, like a cult of dull) and lacking in individuality.
They’ll say men should be providers – and refuse to provide even for themselves (a mantrum) and worse, defend deadbeats!
“It’s okay when we do it” hypocrites. They’re socialists who self-loathe in different ways. An abortion clinic on every corner and whore pills in every 13yo girl’s hands would be alright by them! Moral relativists. “Social liberal, economic conservative” cucks. All the gibs, as long as someone else pays.
You can only strike from your gender role if you were competent enough to have ever achieved it.
They reject their gender role, like male SJWs, in favour of materalism, atheistic hedonism (acting like an animal). It’s the exact same thing.
In their own ideal society, they’d be rejects!
Nihilism in the pomo sense of the word is the belief system of losers, it’s their cover for postmodernism while pretending to be oh-so different (special) from the SJWs (narcissism of small differences).
Even this article’s like “this is a new and special thing”.
No? It’s just that we notice because dueling is illegal (otherwise their lip would get them shot by a real man) and they can’t be cannon fodder without an overt war. This is what happens in the dysgenic situation when you let the Low IQ males with delusions of superiority (a self-proclaimed penis pass, if you will, on all sin) run their whining mouth about how, in the most spoiled society ever, they’re still abject failures! Oh, poor baby in your air conditioned palace on welfare! It must be so hard!
Their failure isn’t society’s fault, it’s a character fault and on the contrary, the ones bitching online are exclusively reared in the middle-class (they had advantages).
They have no excuse.
If a meme about a spoiled suburbanite Prince stereotype offends you…. it should.
Shame is GOOD.
Their slide down the social mobility scale is a sign the system works. You aren’t entitled to a better life than your parents unless you work at least as hard (complaining isn’t work).
9/10 they’re actually nagging. But they do nothing themselves. Only nag. We have male shrews! They expect the rest of us will step in like their helicopter parents. You’re an adult, we owe you nothing.
The Boomers are right about the entitled ones. It just happens to be the hippy kids.
Nagging only works if you’re bound i.e. parents, marriage. Nagging society doesn’t wash and given the advantages men have on many levels (that they deny “male privilege is a myth” when they seek to evade responsibility or champion with hyperbole “men are superior biologically” to signal, both when it’s convenient, like we don’t notice), they don’t have an excuse that blames women e.g. when boys lose out on math tests and other schoolwork, it’s because they study less around the time they discover porn. Asians can’t watch that stuff all day, look at their grades, it isn’t “all men”, it’s all degenerate men who make poor lifestyle choices. So they want a meritocratic system – but only when it leads to positive outcomes for themselves (liars).
If someone works harder than you, they deserve to beat you! Add up hours studied and you’ll find female (and male) conscientiousness isn’t bias, they activate with their IQ the traits which help them. The guy or girl “winging it” the night before deserves to fail*. Low IQ don’t have the IQ to know what they’re NOT doing! That isn’t everyone else’s fault! If there are systemic forces against men in some fields, the same must be true of women in other fields because that is how systems work, ya dummies!
Otherwise it’s like saying there’s north without south or taste without those tacky cheese squares at the other end of the spectrum. Logic is consistent! Smart men address the topic of stupid men – until they’re shouted down as “sexist” (???), like smart women.
It just so happens by nature that there are more lazy men! So yeah, they fail! Confound!
You cannot ignore the left half of the bell curve, men overpopulate it!
They’ve simply never survived in these numbers before because responsibility is the new leprosy in a decadent West. It makes a lot of sense actually. No prior society (that didn’t collapse) ever had to tolerate this much stupid and it shows.
If we live in clown world, send in the clowns…
War is like sexual selection, it’s a good thing that keeps the bad genes down. The modern world is like adding shit to the pool so it doesn’t feel excluded.
It turns out you don’t need to sterilize irresponsible people, just give them a free sex doll on condition they never have children (or they’d be aborted). We could solve this in two generations if we stopped listening to their “feelings” (they don’t have feelings, relativists, they only ramble and screech).
Seriously, hand them sexbots on condition of no kids to inflict on the future world (and no sex crimes, because apparently their hand wasn’t as big as their ego). They’re genetic suicides anyway, that or move them (could be cheaper) to a literal Pleasure Island with no internet (no corrupting the outside world) and they can never leave (I figured Westworld was about this, a brothel prison with no victims, would’ve been cooler). They’d OD in about a week without the nanny state. Actually, a literal death camp could work very simply: press lever 1 for food or 2 for heroin. Technically, it’s suicide. Dummies are predictably hedonic.
*They’ve been told it’s important for literally over a decade. You can lead a horse to water. Education is wasted on the lazy and stupid, and they’re the same people. That’s Dunning-Kruger. They’re blind to what they’re missing because they’re missing it!
They cannot see past their ego to anything, including Pascal’s Wager. Again, deny and dismiss, typical cuck.
The destructive person (antisocial to society) telling you you deserve to be destroyed (like an SJW) because society sucks unless it’s sucking them off (but it isn’t their job to fix it?)… boys who weren’t raised with real discipline have no shame (sociopath trait). They’ve been allowed to get away with ruining themselves and remaining psychologically as teenagers.
It’s just the dysgenic men too proud to become blatant SJWs.
Actually worse than SJWs, wow. They’d sell their grandma for a porn star.
You can’t sympathize with people who hate you and your people.
There’s the obvious traitor and the sneaky little shits who under-mine attempts to make things better for everyone because the gap to their own life would become greater. Fifth Column is worse.
This is the champion of the working-class party in the UK, our GE is tomorrow.
The people who hate IQ never want to ban grades, I said naively.
All grades are based on the psychological construct of ‘g’, better known as IQ.
The middle class introduce all these policies on purpose to reduce social mobility in the working class competition, to kick them and keep them down, to preserve their own position, their own privilege.
Why is Labour dead with the WWC?
The middle class cunts like this.
“The Inadequate Personality Disorder description in DSM-II included ineffectual responses to any physical, intellectual, social, or emotional demands placed on the individual. Despite the lack of any real physical or intellectual deficits, these patients appear poorly adapted to their environment, are inept, have poor judgment, are socially unstable, lack physical and emotional stamina, and chronically cannot cope with everyday stress and strain. Detailed, behaviorally specific criteria were not provided for any of the disorders in DSM-II.”
Meanwhile, I still have to explain the acronym of the very people they claim to represent and support.
THERE ARE WHITE PAPERS ON THIS. THEY HAVEN’T READ A SINGLE ONE.
Snobs can’t judge the content of character to a person, so they must rest on the superficial, the signalled.
All status signallers are snobs.
Snobs are phony intellectuals.
They can’t discern quality, they lack those traits. They judge wealth, and other trappings of reward. They trust a third party opinion (judges, experts, authorities) more than their own and model like a child, from these. It’s mainstream, it’s safe, it’s very Goldilocks to have someone to look down on and someone else to suck up to.
They cannot discriminate quality, so they sneer at ‘discrimination’.
The Middle Class, who think good blood doesn’t matter, because they have none. The new snob, a rejection of blood and acceptance of any identity pretense, however flimsy. They cannot step out from their herd, they cannot be individual and they cannot be creative. They live in permanent fear of rejection. They seek to compete by spotting the creative, but this descended into shock-value politics, an artistic game of chicken. They are the Emperor of no clothes and have nothing. Most are in debt to look rich. They bought no opportunities and a heap of depression and anxieties. If their inheritance legally relied upon legitimacy, they’d quickly care about blood all of a sudden.
The Ikea caste.
The guy drawing attention to his Rolex and bragging about its mechanism doesn’t deserve to be wearing one. He doesn’t realize his target is the people who already know.
The cucks are jeering at us.
Really you’re paying them for a service. They don’t feel guilty about white people. They say the domestic poor deserve it.
inb4 butthurt, he is literally a journalist for The Guardian
Actually a very good question.
TLDR: Because they feel emasculated.
A beard is a complex social signal: a man feeling powerless, as if he has no future, wishing to signal virility but closed off from proving himself by the hegemonic culture, no rites of passage, it’s a sign of Letting Oneself Go, and from this, rebellion against capitalist norms (cleanliness required to work with machines safely, get hired at an interview being well kempt and not being shabby, self-respect), a sign of testosterone in an age of estrogenic influences, a traditional marker of solidarity in the working class (shaving instruments were expensive and a Good Shave a sign of wealth), mild competition and aesthetic expression regarding type of beard etc etc.
Rich men don’t need beards, at most they’ll have stubble from travelling but be embarrassed of it. They find them too grubby, in my experience (do any of the Royals have one)? It’s viewed, here, as a Middle Class Scourge, because they aren’t imitating anyone in particular. It’s an image. The urban social climbers think it’s authentic and rustic and very Countryfile.
This impression carries over to business. Bearded men are seen as deceitful, note the stereotypes about types of beard and various character flaws. It can obscure or alter identity, make you hard to really see, who can trust that?
They are hiding something: their insecurity.
Men are being outcompeted by women at school, at university, in academia, in the workplace, in Government and so forth, what’s one visible thing men can do with their appearance, that women cannot take from them (as they, silly, see it)?
With increasing androgyny, this is like, the ONE thing, they’ve got. Same problem with lad culture (really Eurotrash Ibiza club culture from the 90s, spare us), which has mistaken physical maturity (fucking, drinking, drugs, swearing/being rude to all women as a form of underclass ‘humour’) for social or intellectual maturity (and respect).
A clean-shaven man doesn’t need to look like a furry animal to show dominance and a masculine nature, he has the real-world power and adult behavioural abilities in reserve that requires no display or show of symbols. In fact, counter signalling is their game.
It’s like the guy in credit card debt who buys a sportscar versus the millionaire who buys a secondhand moderately nice car on equity, because who does he need to impress?
The blokes who say women are attracted to status? Ever notice they don’t have any to speak of?