The return of dignity

A New Generation of Prigs, Prudes, and Squares

At the same time, young adults are having their first sexual experience later, and having less sex in general. While in 1988, 60% of boys had had sex by the time they were 19, in 2010 that number was 42%, and overall, the number of sexually active 9th graders has dropped by almost half since the 1990s.

In iGen, professor of psychology Jean M. Twenge reports that “In fact, more young adults are not having sex at all”:

More than twice as many iGen’ers and late Millennials (those born in the 1990s) in their early twenties (16%) had not had sex at all since age 18 compared to GenX’ers at the same age (6%). A more sophisticated statistical analysis that included all adults and controlled for age and time period confirmed twice as many ‘adult virgins’ among those born in the 1990s than among those born in the 1960s. . . .

You don’t see the women complaining about it, wise enough to know you can’t shame a person for being clean and virtuous.

“Virgin pride” would mess with the postmodernists. That’d be funny.

Even with age controlled, GenX’ers born in the 1970s report having an average of 10.05 sexual partners in their lifetimes, whereas Millennials and iGen’ers born in the 1990s report having sex with 5.29 partners. So Millennials and iGen’ers, the generations known for quick, casual sex, are actually having sex with fewer people—five fewer, on average.

MSM…. lied to us?

For profit???

[There are also fewer white people in the younger generations, so fewer options for white people.]

The phenomenon of this “sex recession” has been found not only in the United States, but in other developed countries as well.

Oh, how terrible, right?

“Demographic transition”, period of high-K coming.

It’s almost like the MGTOW rhetoric of wicked Lilith women/Never Marry is controlled ops to justify SJW controls on expression!

Odds are, their mother is sluttier than the thot they hate.

So Millenials’ and iGen’ers’ frugal, stable, “wholesome,” ways have wrought laudatory behaviors. As the sociologist David Finkelhor argued in an op-ed for The Washington Post, the younger generations are “showing virtues their elders lacked . . . We may look back on today’s youth as relatively virtuous, as the ones who turned the tide on impulsivity and indulgence.”

….and we may look back on you as evil and treasonous?

Anecdotally, she notes, young people seem to be feeling more inhibited about their naked bodies in general, and are even much more likely to change behind closed doors at the gym than older folks. We are surrounded by sex, yet our age feels strangely unsexy; we can explore sex without taboo, but don’t know how to be sensual.

Almost like someone’s trying to use porn as culture to suppress the urge to start a family.

50s women used to wear dresses because they were women, they didn’t want to ‘bone’ you.

Women have the same motive now to be feminine but porn-addled idiots reading into it, ruin it. There is no bait nor hook, our vag is not a Venus Flytrap. But if a Muslim rapes us, we get punished with a lecture about wearing a skirt as surely as if we were in Yemen. Is this The First World? The West is culturally dead by attire. Ghetto/rap/porn culture killed it. The 60s viewed mini-skirts as just …skirts, girlish even! Our crime is being white, the motive – evil, obviously. That’s why women are voting right-wing.

Like, you want girls to wear pearl necklaces, stop making the same dead joke. It isn’t funny. Porn culture puts women off. Don’t speak to normal women explicitly. It’s a rule of etiquette women are taught but no longer men. The same way gross-out female comedians piss you off, that’s the pearl necklace joke. No coincidence it’s conservative clothing they try to trigger disgust with. Like men as ‘hipsters’ for not being on display for gays.

At least in the 80s, men wore suits to clubs, women full dresses (I own some).

As Julian further observes, the fact that young people are having less sex may bespeak not only a decline in physical intimacy, but in the kind of emotional intimacy that leads to relationships of every kind.

Yeah looking at this hurts.

Love has become taboo.

Gen Y women more likely to cheat, slightly

Apparently?

We have a single lying chart, people. A single, lying chart. The Y-axis tops out at 30%.

Why Are Millennial Women Cheating More Than Men?



11% female, 10% male.
Wow, huge. LOL

Nah jk, it’s well within the error rate. Logically, if they’re all straight and fucking one another, it’d have to be.

Let’s pick this apart.

Who do they want to distrust whom?

Demographically, who is that?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/millennials-most-racially-diverse-generation-u-s-history-n46361
“the most racially diverse generation in U.S. history. About 43 percent are non-white”

Yup, that’ll do it. Especially when certain demos like the mixed and Hispanic are pushed to marry by relatives.

Back to top article:
“Joan says she was raised according to strict gender norms. “I grew up in the Philippines, a super conservative Catholic country, where cheating was a big no-no for women,” she explains. “You’re supposed to just accept your lot in life, but cheating in men is excused and often encouraged.” She can see a marked difference in the views of women her age compared to those her mother’s age. “Millennials are both way more jaded and way more chill than the previous generation,” she muses.”

How to spot anti-natal propaganda, MGTOW bait?

Note the use of white names, when sexual behaviour is best predicted along racial lines and Gen Y is heavily non-white, in America.
Men are meant to set the standards. What men do, women follow.

Whatever they do.

Monkey see, monkey do, morally.

Do I like this? No. Is it true? Yes. Morally, women are total sheep.

Anything men do, a sizeable number of lemmings with tits shall pursue too.

It’s the conscientious conformity.

“Relationships in general are different [in our generation],” Joan continues. “There seems to be more of a spectrum in how people date, which leads to all sorts of gray areas and wiggle room.

Hey, the PUAs wanted that ambiguity, they got it.

“While most of the women I speak to cheated while in ostensibly monogamous relationships — not a particularly noble challenge to institutional monogamy, they admit — some have now moved on to open or poly arrangements.

The Jews of Silicon Valley (Jews are very loose) push polygamy and polyandry follows, especially among non-white women.
You can tell this is true because they haven’t reported the key demographics – race and religion.

They want you to assume American here = white and Christian, because the story is negative.

Among more white age groups, women are in fact more faithful.

“Without fail, women told me that the men they cheated on were disappointing partners who weren’t meeting their relationship needs.”

No such thing as a ‘partner’. That’s PC language.

The need to have a husband and protector. They never ask about this need.
aka Men who won’t marry get no loyalty. You can’t commit adultery (the only actual, real ‘cheating’) on someone who isn’t your spouse. They didn’t say the vows! What they cheatin’ on?! Exactly? Instagram photo sanctity?!!

Nobody mentions this, for narrative. They’re interviewing an unmarried ‘cheat’ for that quote – fuck all to do with this ‘survey’ which I’m sure was conducted out of an urban area, right?

And don’t ask her what this “need” was in this unmarried woman to feel secure.

Ask these questions.

I never felt guilty,” Sophie says firmly. “All of my partners were people I took care of in the ways you always take care of men: emotionally, sometimes financially and dealing with untreated mental illness.”

So she was acting as a support, a wife.

In return, she got nothing. Worse, drained emotionally, financially and psychologically (dealing with crazies is maddening).
No ring to boot, she moved on. That’s sane. Nobody says anything, I’m not American so I don’t feel threatened in the least by honesty.

If he crazy, emotionally immature and exhibits psychopathic parasitism: LEAVE. That isn’t a MAN.

It’s like the unholy trio of hell naw. Those people shouldn’t even be dating (especially the emotional immaturity part).

Why are American men like this now, is a damn better question. They should be taking care of the woman, no wonder they bolt, the gender roles are backwards!

No woman wants to be your adult caretaker Peter Pan, even your own Mommy.

That’s how Psycho happened. These ‘men’ are acting like they’re disabled, WTF.

Literally no woman wants an adult baby. No one respects that.

All women to the manchild:

You cannot raise children without a husband, an actual man.

Laziness ain’t a disability. 

If American men reject their gender role, women abandon theirs. Hardly a choice.

“I didn’t really trust or respect men deeply enough anyway.”

Were you listening?

BOOM. Right there. Trust, then respect. We instinctively cannot trust a man who is inadequate on all cylinders of his gender role. Women are jaded because the men are soft.

What have they earned, by their actions? What masculinity is there to trust, exactly?

Women don’t respect sluts, either.
Women respect patriarchs, married and loyal husbands.
They’re conflating stats of adulterers (married) to the weasel word cheats – on what? They’re unmarried.

The faux confusion of “cheating” with “adultery” is a false equivalence, mind you.

Adultery in this survey hugely the lowest among wives of WW2 soldiers. No connection to the death of masculinity, obviously.

When are we bringing back stoning for adultery? Both guilty parties, full Bible!

An END to cucking!

Bernie supporters ree

The bootstraps approach only works if there aren’t invaders taking up jobs and houses.

Why houses?

Between half and two-thirds of Millennial income goes on rent. Monthly.

They work multiple jobs, more hours than Boomers at that age.

Generation Rent or Generation Serf?

At this point the history books could call it financial terrorism since they’re barraging the young whites from all sides. Happy to help the diseased barbarians at the Cali gates but refuse to help their own kids/grandkids. A nation of perverts, pathological altruism is sick.

Reducing that expense alone would save the economy and native birth rate. This is why Gen Y seems creepily obsessed with ‘getting on the housing ladder’.

They know it’s over-valued but how much is an escape ladder worth when drowning?

The word Bernie refuses to use is Rent Control. That’s how you get ’em to shoot one another. Make the socialists target the things actually indebting them on a monthly basis. The Boomers of the Guardian won’t allow it, exposing both to the truth.

Know thy enemy. Housing value is tied to many things, mostly “crime”.

Boomers are finding properties hard to sell all of a sudden due to foreigners moving in or being moved in.

Their gated communities plan is drowning like an island in a tsunami of third world rat families packed to the rafters.

There are billions of them.

BILLIONS.

Remind Boomer lefties of this and the never-ending flow of African demographics (posted about here) because they donated thousands over the years since the 80s to help those people breed while refusing their own children help to start families.

And they have the nerve to complain they’re not getting grandkids?

All that virtue signalling Third World charity money in a savings account for decades would’ve helped. Calculate it.

It’s the little things, small decisions easy to spot.

Yum foods brand is generally going under because the working class resent their charity efforts to Africa – who don’t need our help (and never deserved it). Yum is actually Asian and so exploiting the Africans to take their own money back – how ‘kind’. Places like KFC have gone downhill too since they’ve been catering to child rapists (along with many candy makers). There’s a boycott of halal, for cruelty reasons too.

Christians refuse to eat religious sacrifice from another religion. The high street brands who used it have been withering, Muslims mostly eat at home. Plus, corporate favoritism of one religion is actively anti-white, having seen demographics.

A halal list of boycott companies passed around atheists and Christians would shit them up suitably. Simply writing to them and asking would get them to fall over themselves to admit it.

The atheists and vegans say nothing about clear religious labelling, because they’re really misotheists and anti-Christian. The state is actively funding religion by enabling this. Schools and prisons force the poor against their religious rights to eat this immoral shit. I don’t even think a Parliament petition would work, though it’s worth a try.

https://www.change.org/p/uk-government-make-it-compulsory-for-supermarkets-stores-to-clearly-label-halal-meat

Like this but Parliament. We have religious freedom as consumers to avoid it.

“Halal and other meat which has been ritually slaughtered in the UK (either by pre-stunning or non-stun) is not clearly labelled in supermarkets and stores across much of the country. This means that without knowing it, British people may have consumed Halal meat. Consumers deserve to know what they’re buying and should be granted the opportunity to make more informed choices.”

They should sue.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions?page=1&q=halal&state=all

Oddly, they keep getting closed.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/242484

There’s a 6 month limit.

Maybe Breitbart London needs to be roped into this, they’ve come good on petitions before.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/233043

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/240715

It is extremely important that we should all have an honest choice, be fully aware of what we are buying, confident that we are informed of ingredients and should be aware if a product is halal certified as many people with other religions besides Islam are forbidden halal certified products.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/235994

Insufficient stunning doesn’t scientifically count.

Food Labelling Regulations 1996 require information to be given on all pre-packed foods, so informed choices can be made. 
It’s strictly forbidden for some Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists & Christians to consume anything associated with Ritual Slaughter [RS] or a Religious Standard [RS]. Please Label ‘RS’

They literally pray over it.

Why isn’t there an additional tax for charities that help other nations? That would make sense, that’s why. Charity begins at home.

The chickens are roosting. Only self-interest (losing their ‘investment’ in a house, their ‘retirement’) will redpill the Boomer Left hard enough to oppose multiculturalism.

There are BILLIONS of them, and one of you (and your nest egg with a door).

The gumball video of immigration is useful here.

Demand is propped up by the artificial eternal flow of boat people (funded by Gov, bribed) and visa workers, plus dopey Chinks who think our worthless real estate has value because Muh Queen.

Yeah, we’re all queuing up to buy a prestigious apartment in Scunthorpe!

I can’t blame the Boomers for the last one since we’ll just buy it back After. With the age-based theft, some evening out is moral.

So it’s imported voters shipped in to vote traitor (they’re given UBI from white taxes, have been for decades – via the artificial hyperinflated valuation of local councils on their place) and the foreign renters with rich parents in Spain, France, Greece etc. letting them larp over London at a busywork shitty job like “Marketing” or “Tourism”.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/16/footballer-carjacking-attempt-reveals-threat-to-londons-super-rich

In areas like Hampstead Garden Suburb, home to high net worth individuals and a cohort of footballers including Özil, the security gates are getting higher and private security firms busier amid heightened security concerns, fuelled by a spate of sometimes violent home invasions and vehicle-enabled ram raids. Wealthy visitors to the city are also taking measures.

Both equally straining the system. Including one another. 

“What tends to happen is that a home might be demolished and when it gets rebuilt again there might be a large security gate. It obviously looks different from the older homes,” he added, gesturing to one side at an older, open-fronted, red-brick home and then to the other side, where major construction works were shrouded by metal hoarding.

Homogeneous high trust culture v multiculturalism low trust, in a meme.

it hasn’t stopped thieves in other locations from using four-wheel drives to knock down gates

the low IQ have Looney Tunes logic

why are security guards allowed to be armed but not property owners?

and break into homes, often in the full knowledge that they may be occupied.”

Ram-raided by diversity, couldn’t happen to nicer con artists.

Like the Kool Aid mascot, here comes your enrichment!

Muh but move somewhere cheaper!

Like Venezuela?

Or by cheaper, do you mean browner? Such a male privilege thing to say! 😛 How much would you pay per month not to get raped? That’s over half the millennial demographic’s problem and we all know it. “Safe” is the code for it.

It’s a systemic problem. If you move out to the Styx, there are no jobs because the bootstrap people moved them to Asia.

Betrayal. You have to understand the maths of the socialists and how their heads are turned to distractions with false premises – like the tax muh rich but not jews contradiction. Hitler stripped the rich jews of their shit before calling for them to leave. They had a place to go – Judea. They refused.

Similar setup now.

Re-read Kipling’s poem, you don’t get to order around the natives. Superior in body or number doesn’t matter, they’ll win. If the Jews scared of Muslims in London were really scared, they wouldn’t have created all the conditions to import them and 2. rip up their stashed dual passport with Israel.

If you want London sorted out, outlaw dual passports, there’s no other way and anyway, because there’s no legal reason for them. A house divided. This is the only investment that matters. If they can’t run, things will get shaped up sharpish. The enemy of my enemy can be bloody useful.

Match their tactics to destroy us with a Christian V Muslim war, simply by salvaging the capital.

I don’t have to morally or technically agree with the Hitler comparison to understand these facts.

Accept it or get nowhere. Keep headbutting the brick wall of reality.

A petition about dual passports could also clarify their legal purpose as documents of military draft options.

A lot of men would be very interested to know this. Surprised MGTOW haven’t already done it. At least a freedom of information request on what the passport entitles the military to do with the holder.

sample questions, written up formally:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/hm_passport_office

  1. Are passports a military document?
  2. Does the signee enter a covenant with the sovereign military?
  3. Is the military entitled to any rights over the passport holder?
  4. Does the holding of a passport pertain to any hypothetical draft rights of the nation dispensing?
  5. If so, how?
  6. What then, is the military purpose of a passport, if any?
  7. Further, why were they introduced for abroad travel during wartime?

Nothing.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/hm_passport_office?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=draft+military&request_date_after=&request_date_before=&commit=Search

C O I N C I D E N C E

Guys, one of you please put these questions to them.

About halal:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/229231

“considering” consumer rights?

“considering”

There are no domestic or European Regulations that require the labelling of Halal or Kosher meat, but where any information of this nature is provided, it must be accurate and must not be misleading to the consumer.

What a coincidence.

The Government is aware that there is public concern about meat from animals being slaughtered in accordance with religious beliefs being sold to consumers who do not require their meat to be prepared in this way and that there are calls for such meat to be labelled. The Government is considering labelling in the context of the UK leaving the EU.

to avoid issues with consent, duh

one lawsuit would settle this, one

get a Sikh or Buddhist

EU exit can bring opportunities for food labelling to improve transparency for consumers and the world-wide reputation of UK food. We are ambitious in wanting what is best for UK consumers and for UK businesses, both selling on the UK market and on important EU and wider markets worldwide.

translation: we think they can give us more tax money, you have no liberty to avoid this

reality: no, they have 24/7 home cooking, they’re not eating out enough to justify the abuse of human rights (freedom of religion) financially

Winning at life

We need more Millennial success stories for people to emulate.

[not that property is a sure thing, I emphasize]

I do worry these people might be targets for the socialists in future though.

Like, UK self employment used to be a good idea (I heard, before I entered the workforce) but now it costs far more money than waged work because on top of extra expenses personally and for their work and facilities, there’s also a bunch of new taxes at every stage. Naturally this is terrible for locals, the local economy but great for big corporations, their true masters.

They also force ‘diversity’ hires that tank a business with harassment lawsuits and overall incompetence.

Rich coming from him, innit?

Socialists hate workers. When they try to seize the MOP with self employment, the Marxists put their taxes up then wonder why the self-employed fail, tax revenue goes down and we have major stagflation.

Possibly leading into a recession/depression/collapse, delete as apropos.

Marxists:

Champagne socialists lying about socialism part

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48213333
As I predicted.

Some millennials have unrealistic expectations of inheritance and how it may unlock the door to buying a first home, a survey suggests.

They’re planning money they don’t have on something they don’t need?

Pfft.

They don’t want kids? Do you really need to own the white box packed with Ikea furniture?

One in seven young adults expect to inherit money before they are 35, although in reality the typical inheritance age is between 55 and 64.

If your parents aren’t Boomers with party animal health.

The survey, by wealth manager Charles Stanley, suggested that young people expected to receive nearly £130,000.

That’ll buy you a cupboard, Harry.

However, the median average amount handed down was only £11,000.

Minus Sharia tax.

Immigrants themselves will have to divvy between all twelve close family and thirty distant.

Fiver each if they count cousins. You never know how many cousins you have until there’s a funeral.

Advisers said that relying on an inheritance to pay a deposit for a first home was often misguided, even if older family members intended to pass on money when they died.

“People are living longer than ever, so relying on an inheritance to get on the housing ladder is a risky strategy as you may get less, and much later than planned,” said John Porteous, from Charles Stanley.

Trans. : Fuck-all.

“In reality, most people save and invest to get on the housing ladder. Starting early and planning ahead is essential to achieving the deposit you need.”

Your lazy credit-munching ways are genetic, really?

If only we had a digit metric of this!

Did your tutors call you smart? Did you go to forest fun camp? Were you told you were better than other kids and had so much ‘potential’?

They tell that to all the kids.

“Lie to children.”

The research suggested that 22% of millennials expected to receive inheritance to use as a deposit, although official statistics suggest only 7% actually did so.

By the time they get it they’ll afford a drawer.

The Russians have infinity money to bid.

Root out corruption in the shell game of foreign property ownership.

The average expectation of when that inheritance would be received was the age of 50, yet figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that they would have to wait for at least another five years.

Even when that money arrived, ONS data showed that inheritance was much less lucrative than many asked in the survey expected.

I can understand if you want money to live but if you want festival gibs and a picket fence, nah fam.

This isn’t the 1950s you hate on.

Others in the industry have argued that the UK public is “largely ignoring” financial planning for death.

Dan Garrett, founder of will writing service Farewill, said that 30 million people in the UK had not written a will, partly because it had dropped down the household “to do” list.

He also called on the government to clarify its plans for probate fees.

The government is planning to substantially increase the cost to bereaved families of settling the estates of deceased relatives.

The changes were expected to start last month but have been delayed.

Loan forgiveness or demographic death

Fraudulent products aren’t valid anyway. Just sue the schools for mis-sold goods.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/01/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/

If you could vote away your future to benefit elderly lazy rich assholes who hate you while keeping their trust fund brats in coke or dissolve the academic institutions’ fraud that’s ruined your once prosperous society’s life and possibility to reproduce, which would you pick?

(((Who))) owns these young plantation workers? Who bought their debt?

Where are the names?

Stopping them from having savings, being minimalists etc etc.?

Answer d.

Look at your chains.

Credit: Master Brew

Do you want your people to be indentured servants to con artists who practiced decades-long trickery?

Why turn a blind eye to this socialism? Do you really think the product has gained hundreds of percent in value?

Free whitey.