The sexism of circumcision

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/376074/jewish/The-Mark-of-Truth.htm

 

“Circumcision purifies and refines. It forces us to make a sacrifice. Removing the foreskin diminishes the pleasure and enjoyment of intercourse.1 We sacrifice such pleasure and proclaim that, on our scale, Divine instruction is a greater priority than self-gratification.2

 

Males could have been created without the foreskin, yet G‑d wanted us to remove it ourselves. This was to demonstrate that as we complete the physical appearance of our bodies, so can we perfect the contours of our personalities and the shapes of our souls.3″

 

1.

Midrash Tanchumah, Tazriah 5 and Sefer Hachinuch, Mitzvas Milah (The anonymous author, who identifies himself only as “a Levite from Barcelona,” was a student of the Rashba, Rabbi Shlomo ben Aderet, in the thirteenth century). Our sages further taught that circumcision is an offering to G‑d that, like a sacrifice, atones for inherent human weaknesses (Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 29).

 

2.

Classical Jewish thought has long maintained this position. However, contemporary scientific studies on this matter have failed to produce conclusive evidence either way.

Uhuh…..

3.

Maimonides in his Guide for the Perplexed, v. III, ch. 29. See also R. Bachye on Genesis 17:13.

 

Sacrificing your own kids…. but not to Moloch, don’t be silly!

https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/70775/jewish/Likkutei-Sichot-Tazria.htm

This work involves both milah, cutting the thick foreskin, and priyah, ripping open the thin membrane, which on a spiritual plane alludes to the subduing of our material desires.25 Afterwards, one must perform metzitzah (sucking out the blood), thus removing the excitement generated by material things from one’s body as a whole.”

Doesn’t sound Satanic at all…. they totally don’t need that spiritual energy…. but ‘priests’ need to do it, not surgeons or anyone with medical training and pain relief.

I covered previously studies of the medical damage involved, ripping out nerve bundles.

As a consequence, a husband cannot emotionally bond with his wife (Jewish men are oddly notorious for cheating) nor the wife with the husband (see satisfaction studies).

https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/2917521/jewish/The-Circumcision-of-Desire.htm

 

“How we relate to G‑d affects how we relate to other people. That is Hosea’s message – and vice versa: how we relate to other people affects the way we think of G‑d. Israel’s political chaos in the eighth century bce was intimately connected to its religious waywardness. A society built on corruption and exploitation is one where might prevails over right. That is not Judaism but idolatry, Baal-worship.

 

Now we understand why the sign of the covenant is circumcision, a commandment given in Tazria. For faith to be more than the worship of power, it must affect the most intimate relationship between men and women. In a society founded on covenant, male-female relationships are built on something other and gentler than male dominance, masculine power, sexual desire and the drive to own, control and possess. Baal must become ish. The alpha male must become the caring husband. Sex must be sanctified and tempered by mutual respect. The sexual drive must be circumcised and circumscribed so that it no longer seeks to possess and is instead content to love.”

Anti-men rhetoric, you again…. Is that ish like Ishtar?

Whereas Christians see husbands AS alpha males…. as does biology, because the alpha male is part of a monogamous breeding pair with an alpha female. There’s no such thing as a single alpha male.

https://www.chabad.org/kabbalah/article_cdo/aid/379485/jewish/Healing-Swollen-Ego.htm

 

The foreskin of the male reproductive organ effects his experience of marital relations in two ways: it increases his gross sensual pleasure and decreases his sensitivity to his wife by insulating him from her to a certain extent. By removing the foreskin, the experience of marital relations becomes for the man less of a narcissistic indulgence and more of a true spiritual coupling between him and his wife. Once the spiritual dimension of marital relations is allowed into the picture, it enhances the physical dimension as well. The sages of the Talmud therefore state that ideally, at least, it is the Jewish couple that experiences the truest enjoyment in marital relations.”

 

Satisfaction studies have disabused them of this notion.

 

“As originally created, the physiology of woman was such that she did not have a menstrual cycle, and the process of conceiving and giving birth did not involve any bleeding. Nor did she bleed when she first engaged in marital relations. These (as well as other) facets of life were introduced into reality as the result of the primordial sin.”

Myth, that isn’t how hymens work. Some women aren’t even born with one. You might as well appeal to humours in healthcare. Not even wrong. Why is it always a man talking about female anatomy and periods? Sit down, shut up.

It isn’t even the hymen capable of that bleeding, it’s the friction of the vagina (and its heavy blood supply) that is capable of bleeding profusely (in virgins or non-), which must be worse/more likely when the man has no idea how to make her wet in the first place (inexperienced or incompetent lovers) and has no foreskin to reduce friction naturally.

Satan really is deceiving them.

 

When a man has been circumcised of his gross sensual approach to marital relations, he retains more control over his sexual passion, and is thus less likely to succumb to them. His circumcision thus helps him not engage in forbidden marital relations, including relations with his wife during her period.”

If blood is the issue, he couldn’t screw his wife during normal spotting or pregnancy spotting, nor if she were ‘bleeding’ miniscule amounts (no blood supply) from the hymen as a virgin.

Wrong, again!

Frigidity isn’t possible with women, but the impotence (ED or whatever other term) does occur in mutilated men, as you’d also expect with mutilated women.

https://www.chabad.org/theJewishWoman/article_cdo/aid/2287938/jewish/Why-Women-Dont-Need-Circumcision.htm

They hate their sons, duh.

“Circumcision is a tangible reminder to all men that they are the masters of their bodies, that they are in control of their sexual urges.”

Gaslighting from a mother who hates you but likes her own prepuce where it is. It’s funny their demon is a sexy woman (Lilith) not a part of Christian lore. They are not master of their body, their mother is. Maybe Freud wanted his mother to get his foreskin back.

“Cutting back the foreskin represents tapering the self-centered nature of lust. It’s not only about me, but about another person’s dignity and desires. It’s not all about the pleasure that I want, but about the pleasure that G‑d wants me to have.”

This is written by a woman. Clearly.

“Perhaps this reasoning behind circumcision can account for the Talmud’s statement that women are born naturally circumcised. Generally speaking, a woman’s nature is not to dominate someone whom she desires. Studies show that female sexual predators make up such a small percentage that there is little known about them as a group.1 Although women may have many imperfections, it seems that they are naturally less in danger of violating the dignity of others through their lustful impulses.”

Then why are most rapists circumcised, when it’s measured?

“Both men and women are entrusted to serve G‑d with dignity and consciousness. At the core of this service is the challenge to infuse meaning into the most mundane aspects of our life. To imprint the covenant on our physical body. And perhaps it is in this arena that women are naturally gifted. This gift of “natural circumcision”—the perspective of fluidity between the holy and the mundane—empowers (and obligates) women to become leaders. In the era preceding the global redemption, when the schism between what is worldly and what is G‑dly will vanish, feminine leadership is vital.”

Women also have a prepuce. It evolved in both sexes for biological purposes, including pleasure.

Does she own shares in a lube company?

She basically admits that partially castrating men keeps them in line as husbands (less adultery, in theory*) and makes them less masculine (well, yeah). That isn’t FOR them….

*Since they can’t bond with the wife, they seek other people.

Also, the American divorce rate is tied to circumcised men. As they get older and “need” Viagra (like Israel, how odd!) they start to doubt the wife’s attractiveness, as does she, causing separation.

A guy says about “rupturing the hymen” as women’s circumcision in the comments…. no. Not how it works. In the rare cases a woman has no gaps in hers, it must be surgically perforated to allow menstrual blood out. It goes from an antibacterial barrier for the safety of a baby to ….a more flexible antibacterial barrier. It only disappears from easy sight once a woman has given birth for the first time. Even in virgins (say a nun), it does break down over time, it isn’t just exercise, time itself thins it because, again, no blood supply. 

That’s why surgeons can cut it with a scalpel to release old menstrual blood and the girl won’t bleed to death.

It’s kinda like those extra fingers that naturally drop off.

Women aren’t even born with the same thickness of membrane, it ages uniquely between women, so this discussion is really stupid. Women aren’t all the same, medically!

Well obviously men can be raped

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-49057533

it’s just far less common due to the higher upper body strength of male attackers to females (easier pickings)

but like many rapists, the female (or unstudied, more common male on male) kind will incapacitate the victim if they can (proving intent) with alcohol, other drugs or physical restraints, like the male-to-female counterparts

“Another is that men view all sexual opportunities with women as positive.” more Jewish lies

“In fact, Weare says, “an erection is purely a physiological response to stimulus”.” they get it for no reason during sleep…. more porn lies that physical arousal = mental consent. Women are wet most of the time, it’s just the body keeping everything running, but porn lies.

“Men can obtain and sustain an erection even if they’re scared, angry, terrified etc,” she says. – more likely, especially in children or virgins or someone with a moral reason to object like religion, because fear is physical arousal.

Men own their own bodies, it should be assumed they do not give consent, that’s how the system works. Legally, the assumption is no. Like a bank can’t take your money assuming you consent. The military can’t deploy you assuming you consent to join. Porn has gaslighted white men into thinking their only value is sex toy for cheap women.

The only legitimization of consent that worked was the traditional society solution of marriage. But rape by fraud has always been illegal, including where the non-consent (because all consent has conditions, like the person being who they claim, certain contraception being used etc) was known by both parties at the time.

But consent doesn’t hold up outside an honour society, especially when sexual predators are also compulsive liars.

The ignorance about biology is intentional, blame the victim.

“There’s also research that shows women can respond sexually when they are raped (e.g. have an orgasm) because their body is responding physiologically. This is an issue for both male and female victims that is not discussed enough, but there is clear evidence in this area.”

forced orgasm is not pleasant, for either sex, it’s actually a form of pain, physical and mental

(((porn))) lies

this is about as surprising as the knee hammer test causing a reflex kick

for the same reasons, reflex, nerves

even electricity can stimulate men to orgasm, the pain of extreme electricity too

not that it’s common in female cases, they just are physically capable of it because stress tenses muscles

again quelle surprise

the brain cannot shut off the spine, it’s biologically impossible

A number of the participants in Weare’s 2017 study reported FTP experiences after getting extremely drunk or high, and being unable to stop what was happening.

In the first world, people should be able to get drunk without being raped.

Or what’s the first world?

One of those interviewed for the new study describes going home with a woman after a night out clubbing, and blacking out after being given what he suspects was a date rape drug. He says he was then forced to engage in non-consensual sex.

That could’ve turned into an kidney murder story too. Clubbing is really hunting grounds for some r-types. Hold the bars responsible for the drugs. Sometimes the bartender’s in on it.

Although (anti-white) misogynistic murderers/rapists (future serial killers) have a new excuse: “sex games”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/25/fatal-hateful-rise-of-choking-during-sex

while no human can actually ‘consent’ to be murdered, attempted or otherwise

it reminds me of the dysmorphia people who want to be blinded or have their legs chopped off

their consent isn’t valid for self-harm

and the “I was just following orders” excuse has never flown

they say porn has no influence on behaviour but it should clearly be banned, trafficking issues aside

it’s (((their))) way of ruining families and marriages with global mental competition.

The Bible clearly states looking at another with lust is adultery. Porn is un-Christian and clearly Satanic (all the violence kinda hints).

The misogynist murderers like the kink excuse because 1. it’s something to brag about in this sick world and 2. it humiliates the innocent woman. It also implicitly tries to justify what was rape – of them while alive or as a corpse, obviously they’re admitting to necrophilia. And the charges are being REDUCED for that.

All rapists are r-types, sexually aggressive up to cruelty, just write laws that punish r-types and leave the good men and women alone.

I assumed the men being raped also exhibited the researched (and linked here) “freeze” behaviour?

in women, the post-trauma freeze response leaves more semen inside, increasing the probability of pregnancy.

Another describes being coerced into sex while working at a holiday camp one summer, while he was a student. A female co-worker had discovered a letter he had written to a boyfriend, and threatened to out him as gay unless he slept with her.

Coercion vitiates consent, still rape.

As for the fantasy line, lad culture is toxic to young men (funded by magazines pushing holidays on men) and it’s also impossible to have a fantasy (controlled) about something you do not control (an attack). What those ones actually have is a domination fantasy, inaccurately and immorally described as ‘rape’.

The choking thing is a Muslim fantasy, however. Nobody will study that.

The bloodletting extension is Jewish, like that creepy comic writer in America.

Strangulation – fatal and non-fatal – “squeezing”, “neck compression” or, as some call, it “breath-play” – is highly gendered. On average, one woman in the UK is strangled to death by her partner every two weeks, according to Women’s Aid. It is a frequent feature of non-fatal domestic assault, as well as rape and robbery where women are the victims. It is striking how seldom it is seen in crimes against men.

misogynists, as well as being would-be rapists (opportunity or not) also have fantasies of murder they eventually want to act on

it’s been known since Jack the Ripper

Numerous studies have shown that non-fatal strangulation is one of the highest markers for future homicide, which is why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and most US states have developed preventative legislation to strengthen police, prosecutorial and sentencing policies that surround it. In most US states, for example, it is now compulsory for police to charge strangulation assaults as felonies. Yet in the UK, they can fall under battery – the mildest assault possible.

so is a bruise, for comparison

since they love choking so much, bring back hanging

what’s good for the goose is good for the gander

Susan Edwards, a barrister and law professor, has spent decades fighting to make strangulation a stand-alone offence.

21st century.

“In the UK, it’s routinely minimised at every level,” she says. “It’s presented as a momentary loss of control. Attempted strangulations often leave no visible injury and fatal cases too frequently end in light sentences. You hear things such as ‘lover’s tiff’. A cardiac arrest can occur within seconds during strangulation, so there’s also the defence that strangulation wasn’t the cause of death.”

hypoagency in misogynists, imagine my shock

“women are the weaker sex, which is why you need to dominate them with violence”
“I didn’t mean to kill her your Honour! it was only attempted!”

And now, a new defence has been added to the mix – consent. Fiona Mackenzie, an actuary, set up We Can’t Consent to This following the outcry over the so-called “rough sex killing” of Natalie Connolly, 26, by her millionaire partner John Broadhurst, 40. Despite the victim having 40 separate injuries, including serious internal trauma, a fractured eye socket and bleach on her face, Broadhurst received a sentence of three years, eight months for manslaughter.

Bleach on her face trying to dispose of the body. For those not in the know.

Do not defend a psychopath MO.

“People were talking about this defence as if it was one isolated incident and I knew it wasn’t,” says Mackenzie. Although English law does not recognise consent to choking – or any physical harm – in the context of consensual sex, the Labour MP Harriet Harman has just announced her intention to have this underlined again in the forthcoming domestic violence bill. “It needs more emphasis because defence teams are increasingly offering it up, maybe because rough sex has crept into the mainstream,” says Mackenzie. “I’ve had so many women get in touch to say they have been horrified on Tinder dates by partners who have choked them during sex. If you’re dating, it’s expected of you and if you don’t go along with it, you’re boring.”

not consenting to attempted murder

PUAs are rapists, more proof – because she can’t withdraw consent if she cannot talk.

No really, that’s a given reason. I’ve seen on forums they claim it works because she can’t tell you to stop.

“But the next thing I remember is waking up gasping for breath with him on top of me. I’m not sure how long I passed out for. I booked an Uber at 6.30am to get the hell out of there. The next day, I saw the bruises on my chest. We spoke after this and all he said was that, ‘we both got a bit carried away’.”

You have to go to A&E, brain damage possible with any ‘passing out’.

Blaming her, yep, PUA. It’s incitement to attack women in many cases, including overt advice to choke a woman to display ‘alpha’.

At what point does stupid trip over into evil?

“Both those women were very young, and very drunk, killed by much older men they had met just hours before,” Mackenzie says.

Textbook sexual sadist.

There’s going to be a register, isn’t there?

But, historically, it has been “niche” and an overwhelmingly male pastime.

More diversity imported from the gays. Many killers in old studies were actually homosexual…. coincidence?

Hedonists are never ever satisfied, they’ll keep pushing the boundaries of alleged ‘kink’ until society shoots them or they die.

 eventually led to section 63 of the 2008 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, making it illegal to possess an extreme pornographic image which included acts that threaten a person’s life. However, the cases that have come to court have been ones involving bestiality or child abuse. “It’s not used for scenes of violence, strangulation and rape, which is what was intended,” says Edwards.

A person who wants to murder you does not want sex, they want to murder you. Put the magazines and porn sites up on charges too. That porn is basically a mid-cancelled snuff film.

 The sex game gone wrong was something the police or Crown Prosecution Service came up with, not the defence. “It felt that the police thought she had somehow asked for it,” says Sarah. “The ‘sex game gone wrong’ story was a way of blaming everyone and no one.” The sleeping man was found not guilty. Nothing was ever explained.

will this be the Clinton’s excuse? Andrew’s?

Well done America

New law will force child sex abusers to pay for their own castration before being released from jail

Needs to be surgical, however, and all rapists, considering criminal versatility this would reduce overall crime.

No half-measures.

A new law will force pedophiles whose victims were under 13 to pay for their own castration before they’re released from jail. The HB 379 bill was signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey Wednesday after being introduced by Republican State Representative Steve Hurst. It will see child molesters undergo chemical castration, with drugs used to suppress their sexual urges. Anyone who refuses to do so will be considered in violation of their parole and kept in prison.

They want to let the pedos out, this is an excuse.

And lower age of consent to 13.

Obviously.

Explaining the reasoning behind the controversial proposal, Hurst told CBS42: ‘They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime. ‘I had people call me in the past when I introduced it and said don’t you think this is inhumane?

Forcing rape victims to carry to term is inhumane. The trauma of any rape victim is inhumane.

It’s discrimination based on age, this cannot be lawful.

The rapist clearly cannot be trusted to use their organ in a legal manner.

If there’s a way to do it surgically to female pedos, them too.

Everyone on the rapist’s side should be on some kinda list.

‘I asked them what’s more inhumane than when you take a little infant child, and you sexually molest that infant child when the child cannot defend themselves or get away, and they have to go through all the things they have to go through. ‘If you want to talk about inhumane – that’s inhumane.’

God didn’t say one rape was okay.

Half measures are evil.

Day before 13? Evil. Day after? Go ahead. WTF.

Rape victims in general cannot defend themselves, they tend to freeze, it’s been studied.

A total just world fallacy requiring telepathy, precognition and super strength.

Let’s leave him drunk in a bath-house and see if he can ‘get away’.

Sometimes people narrowly avoid it but they’re still traumatized and the predator is still a danger.

Hurst has also claimed that his bill could deter pedophiles from targeting children, and reduce the number of child sex offenses taking place.

Yeah make them target adult women and make rape babies.

What trauma?

A woman only deserves legal protection and sympathy prior to age 13, right?

Also, if they can control who they target, it’s fully intentional, premeditated predation and the cure is a rope.

But Alabama attorney Raymond Johnson is among those who oppose it. He thinks existing punishments are sufficient. Johnson explained: ‘They’re going to challenge it under the 8th Amendment Constitution. ‘They’re going to claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment  for someone who has served their time and for the rest of there life have to be castrated.’

These people are subhuman and cannot be rehabilitated.

God never said such people could be pure, the sentence was death.

Sexual sadists are not fully human, the neuroscience is clear.

Man ‘found with 21 severed vaginas’ in his freezer appears in court

Castrate them – before they do it to you.

Male suicides up because of Netflix

You only figured they hate us after the child porn ‘scandal’? Really?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890856719302886

The release of 13 Reasons Why was associated with a significant increase in monthly suicide rates among U.S. youth aged 10 to 17 years. Caution regarding the exposure of children and adolescents to the series is warranted.

Were they mostly white too?

Caution? Fuck caution, I want arrests. This was incitement.

Since it involves gory scenes of criminal acts, children shouldn’t be anywhere near it.

I don’t think you can accurately claim women as the hysterical over-emotional sex when males commit more self-murder, a crime, as well as other murder. This is clearly irrational self-destruction, in its most literal sense.

So you often see men murder their own children before themselves, because it’s all murder.

From the PDF:

Imitation may have contributed to the increase in the male youth suicide rate after the release of 13 Reasons Why, given a male adolescent character made a serious suicide attempt by firearm at the end of the series. A well-known gender paradox in suicide also exists, with male rates of suicide being higher than female rates and female rates of attempted suicide being higher than male rates across the lifespan.

Across lifespan – so…. duh. Control for that and it vanishes.

Self-murder must be shamed, (possibly mocked*) and legally punished (like France confiscating all of their belongings), romanticizing it and showing examples makes it more probable (Werther effect).

Degeneracy includes cultural or self-indulgence of self-destruction.

This is toxic. This is actively corrupting the young. That is a crime when we call it grooming.

And the idea of kids not being influenced is a blatant lie, fathers doing this should be ashamed too.

“Serious” attempt – all of them? Like, taking the male example, this is the worst example a provider can provide.

It’s the least masculine thing possible, stop trying to sex it up, Hollywood!
[Note: many so-called men who commit ‘suicide’ when others rely on them also refuse the prospect of a draft and won’t join the military, this cowardly fact demonstrates how it’s purely self-indulgent and not plain psychiatric ‘suffering’ because we have medications for that.]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804892/

The current study aimed to examine whether a family history of suicidal acts predicts severity of suicide attempts.

It does.

Of all the examples of a provider, offing yourself in mildly difficult times (globally, historically, economically) is a disgrace.

Let’s not mince words, I don’t when women are at fault either. Snowflakes go home.

Social learning theory holds that we must hold these criminals responsible.

It is a disgrace and the word needs to come back into usage. If you take on a responsibility (spouse, kids) then you’d better damn well not ragequit because you racked up credit card bills on showing off to the neighbours. WTF.

Responsibilities are called commitments for a reason.

A free man with no commitments? Different but no less toxic culturally.

A man who is setting examples and has people who depend on him to survive? Like a stay at home mother who can’t get back into the workforce? Fuck you for saying that’s a ‘choice’. That’s a weak man. Don’t take on what you don’t want to be responsible for. We must hold men accountable as the head of the house if they take on that role. 

No half-arsing, blaming women or complaining it’s ‘hard’ like they’re down a coal mine farting black.

They abuse their gender role by claiming to have all the accountability and then wimping out like a child** (adultery/cucking, divorce, abandoning kids, substance abuse, domestic violence), when it turns out to be harder than glamorous 50s postcard martini sipping after work. Fucking DUH. I’d be interested in a study of father and mother history because I’d assume the father’s suicide to have a larger effect (being the provider).

**We must expect men to be men again. Penis doesn’t qualify. Nobody will respect you on the basis of chromosomes, male of female. This is silly. Those delusional ones appeal to a time that has never existed (Biblical times tested men and failures resulted in death).

I’ll bet the number of ‘successful’ suicides among males disproportionately came from the under-diagnosed male borderlines. Put that information out there, not ‘killing yourself as revenge’ propaganda.

I almost think the MRAs like other men offing themselves, they seem giddy to talk about it. Oddly, they never want vulnerable men to obtain diagnosis and treatment before that point so either they logically want to abuse the situation for attention (a borderline trait) or they hate their fellow man so much they perversely see less competition for women as a good thing? It’s twisted but destroying your own sex is still sexism. Corrupting them and filling their head with tall tales about how great suicide is, that’s standard sociopath or borderline fare.

Such males replace the father, who usually wasn’t around.

MRAs would have no following were it not for deadbeats.

The superego forms based on what your parents do and society accepts.

The Suicide Paradox (Rebroadcast)

Even reporting suicide can prime (already weak) people into doing it (so the porn violence thing must occur, among others).

Glamorizing it is blatant incitement, like the pathetic Elliot attention*. Rich entitled kid can’t buy love, news at 11.

or Mixed race guy ask where the white women at? or Idiot tries to demand respect.

So much so-called masculine media glamorizes suicide too (WW1 films, 300) that toxic masculinity, if properly defined, would align closely to degeneracy as it is used to weaken men specifically.

Literally, to degenerate man.

‘Toxic masculinity’ is the Left’s way of referring to male self-destruction. With different ideals, for Marxist, anti-natal purposes. The premise of degeneracy has been true since late-stage Rome. Very Zeus. Terrible father, husband, angry drunkard, bored, vain, foolish rapist.

Just like ‘toxic femininity’ is fake nice, also valuing itself by promiscuous sexual attention and wants to conceive only to murder the baby post-birth. Very Lilith. Same vices, with the genders switched.

Both sexes deserve positive, strong examples. The ancients didn’t respect Zeus because he had a beard and they didn’t respect Lilith for having breasts. They mocked their deities constantly for their human flaws. All Zeus did was sit around waiting to get offended. Original broflake.

Goethe was harsher than I’m being:

And now you want to hold a writer accountable and condemn his work, which, misinterpreted by a few dim-witted souls, may have rid the world of a dozen idiots and ne’er-do-wells who didn’t know any better than to blow out the weak remainder of what little light they had!

Don’t hold others accountable for idiots’ actions.

Count it in the crime stats.

Don’t glamorize male death nor incite it.

It’s almost like humanity NEEDED war as a pressure release valve for the rest of the time.

Ask yourself: are the men who kill themselves in the most peaceful time of human history capable of providing for a family, in any reality? When we mess with natural selection, nature has a funny way of course-correcting, although many suicides are likely preventable.

If society were a meritocracy, some people will lose out. They’re just louder now.

Feminine brain, youthful brain

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/womens-metabolic-brain-age-around-three-years-younger-mens-180971425/

Predictable.

“New research suggests that women’s brains stay energized well into old age, making their brains appear about three years younger than men’s of the same chronological age.”

Given

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/

Linked in first:

https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/01/29/1815917116

Men didn’t evolve to live long, so it isn’t so much remarkable that women live longer with healthier brains but men,  to be competitive with other men in youth and war, age terribly simply because so few would survive there’s no evolutionary pressure.

Some tough choices ahead for the cooties crowd.

Stick to imaginary phantasms of 20th century masculine superiority solely intended to run up credit debt or actually be healthier.

Here comes the academese:

“Researchers remain uncertain why such metabolic differences exist”

EVOLUTION.

“It’s not that women’s brains seem to age slower than men’s,”

Literally is.
Watch the twist.

“Rather, it seems that women’s brains start off at a younger age when they reach adulthood, and they keep that throughout the remainder of their adulthood, basically buying them a few extra years.”

Not how it works. At all.

It’s like saying you start a race at the finish line, words have meanings.

If they’ve reached adulthood, they’ve reached adulthood. You can’t change the meaning to be quantum. Women mature faster (partially from earlier puberty and slower, longer sum development time because of that) and go on to metabolically age better because testosterone is known to burn out the system.

Gradual puberty + lower T = good for long-term brain health.

aka Not women’s fault. Help your fellow men. Maybe that explains why celibates like Tesla (who, let’s face it, probably didn’t masturbate), who kept their T-levels low as a result, lived longer and stayed lucid. Maybe that’s why monks live longer too, staying sharp. Male chastity has observable benefits.

The autobiographies of genius seem to evidence longer average puberty, too. The sensitive kid who’s a later bloomer?

The Victorians called masturbation self-abuse because the compulsion/addiction would tend to be co-morbid with other mental problems, including depression. How many porn addicts are depressed?

And what do they do to self-soothe because (someone) tells them it’s unanimously ‘good for you’?

Even nuns tend to live longer which does point to lower testosterone being a pre-requisite for a long life, neatly explaining why male levels gradually lower. It isn’t like evolution is picking on men. Aggressive animals have shorter lifespans across species. This is the price of being the protector/provider sex.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/men-too-much-testosterone-linked-to-shorter-lifespan-112213

“Overall, men with circulating testosterone levels between 9.8 to 15.8 nmol/L range tended to live the longest.”

Men are entitled to know what their healthy levels should be, study them!

Men age faster cognitively, he’s like a magician trying to switch your attention onto women when there’s a medical problem with men.
Assuming they want to live long and prosper.

Like, sorry, if that’s a sexist assumption.

“Previous studies have found that aging women often exhibit stronger reasoning, memory and problem-solving skills than males of the same age. But it’s unclear whether this trend is related specifically to metabolism or to a different aspect of brain function.”

Hormonal interaction.

“This might mean women are a little bit more resilient to certain aspects of brain aging in general, but it could also introduce certain vulnerabilities,”

Lying liar. Not even one example? How can you try to spin a youthful brain as a bad thing?

Women aren’t so much MORE resilient (although oestrogen helps) but men are MORE fragile.

HELP THEM.

“Having a younger brain for longer could make the brain more vulnerable to certain things as well.”

Still no mention of men? This isn’t a woman’s issue, there’s nothing new here as stated, women already perform better as a known overall finding*, he totally ignores what men need because it involves admitting they aren’t the best at something….

These arrogant men are sex traitors. Their ego won’t let them admit men need help. So have fun with higher neurodegeneration risk because one guy won’t admit he’s not #1 at everything.

Men are not the control group, it’s the mean between both groups.

Basic category error and erroneous maths.

Hubris is a deadly sin. Treating male ill-health like it’s normal will literally kill men.

OT but relevant:

If we took men as the control, the shorter male lifespan is not only normal but hinted at being desirable, you don’t want to change the norm, with women being unusually longer-lived (greater distance from norm). Actually, the average is between the groups, again. The difference from the norm is smaller, easier to broach and bring those below it up to speed.

*Because unlike IQ studies, they can’t conveniently ‘exclude’ the left-side of the male bell curve to skew their findings dishonestly. This happens after they sample from middle-class academia pupils largely from suburban populations, a huge bias/filter itself.

Sure, throw other men under the bus and blame women for biology. Sexism both ways!

Reminder:

Bitch lit

If Roosh V were a woman, he’d have written this book.

Best page screencap to illustrate my point:

amazon.com/Nice-Just-Place-France-Everything/dp/1451687761

Nice is Just a Place in France: How to Win at Basically Everything by The Betches

I don’t know whether I love or hate this book because parts of it are either spot-on or dead wrong.

If you want to know where much degenerate propaganda is aimed at women – getting a husband books.

That’s the reward. Unfortunately, they seem to be correct, men do marry the sluts generally.

This book opens (you can read it online) by slagging off virtuous women as losers.

“Nicegirls”.

That isn’t the wrong end of the stick, it’s two sticks that look alike.

Being a doormat isn’t a virtue but good people do have generally better lives (conscientiousness studies).

If you ignore the degenerate sections it’s pretty funny.

I think the MRAs would love this book to justify their misogyny, that alone is worth the price.

Because their brand of sexism is vindicated by …another.

To avoid the bitches or stop them stealing your husband, you must know how they think.

Either buy bitch lit or befriend them. I know my choice.

Video: The 9 traits of the borderline personality

Male or female.

The instability (emotional) is the BIG one.

Much like a psychopath, they cannot hold down a (healthy) relationship. Bonds between a couple must be stable.

However, like a codependent, they feel they’re nothing without someone, ANYONE.

Stop and start. Stop and start. Lots of small connections, one night stands.

The typical one night stand (m/f) has a far higher chance of being borderline.

Lashing out at anyone rejecting them, however trivial.

Yep, the angry phone number guys. The occasional woman who gets angry if a random man doesn’t want to fuck her. The entitlement.

Borderlines DO NOT DO rejection. It’s a main trigger.

They have no self to fall back on. Obsessed with self-improvement, no identity though. Constantly trying new things that never seem to work out (think Madonna’s looks). Lots of “bad luck” with the opposite sex. Tendency to idolize others, have idols, especially online. They gain a sense of self via this Other. The stans who can delude themselves into stalking, harassing or raping their idol, dangerous people. A courtship disorder is possible or simple limerence at a distance. Feeling a sense of ownership, viewing other humans as objects or property.

Vengeful, rage tantrums, can attempt to justify abuse with some imagined or minor slight.

You provoked me” or “you made me hurt you” or “why can’t you behave”?

That would be the classic “bunny boiler” or “disturbed young man” type.

It’s common to hear, “I own you” …. they actually think this.

Both are big on gaslighting so can be confused with a narcissist, which actually isn’t (usually) as bad.

It’s the men who ask to an abused woman “what did you do to make him hit you”?

Classic BPD, sick bastards. They never man up, nothing is ever their personal fault, even the actions of their own body don’t feel like they belong to them. When they picture themselves as the man (issues with empathy for the opposite sex), they assume the man was never at fault, even if he threatened murder.

They will FIND an excuse to hurt.

“I’m the real victim here”, as the other party is bleeding and traumatized in the corner.

They can seem glib like the psychopath or narcissist and can be at times grandiose with narc features. However, it’s an act, usually in response to attention. It’s fake. Their come-down is when this reality hits them again, which can look bipolar. They claim to be depressed when they don’t want to do something, a lot of small compulsive lies.

A rollercoaster of emotional bullshit. Like psychopaths, they deny their own condition but ALSO spread outright lies about it (we’re nice really, we’re the real victim, we suffer,  pity us, you can fix us etc).

The logical reply is “wait, if you don’t have it, how do you know so much about it?”

This makes them angry. You wouldn’t like them when they’re angry (they can intimidate by threatening this “loss” of temper, which is a deliberate choice to abuse). Adults don’t lose their temper, toddlers do, because toddlers are still developing the brain areas to control it.

Anger isn’t really an emotion, it’s an impulse. They have issues, emotion is quite healthy but being angry all the time is bad for your body. The Bobo dolls study and others show feeding anger makes it stronger and more frequent. “Let it all out” applies to tears, not physical abuse. Angry people get an endorphin rush, abusers enjoy abusing.

Like the psychopath, they study a lot online of how normal people think. They can quote forum posts to act normal or pass for intelligent, to lure in victims. It’s vapid trivia masquerading as knowledge.

A dichotomous view of life that is too shallow to withstand scrutiny.

e.g. all men are rapists/assholes v. all women are whores/crazy.

The common denominator there….

See, they find it helpful to define themselves in terms of what they’re not.

They deny their Shadow Self and project it, it’s stereotypical they claim they’re incapable of that Evil Terrible Terrible Thing. But the Enemy is FULL of it, to bursting! It’s so obvious!

Race they belong to generally but self-loathing can present if encouraged.

Sexism is far more common because of parental issues.

So it’s the misogynist who says

“I’m not sexist, I just don’t trust or believe or respect women.

OR

For balance, the misandrist who says

“I’m not sexist, I just don’t like or rely on or hang around men.”

It can present in so many ways but they’re blind to it, having projected it far, far away from what they believe is physically possible.

Anyone who thinks it’s impossible to be sexist personally, ever, at any point, is living in a bubble. Prejudices exist in all humans.

Being suspicious of all women is dodgy, being suspicious of a seductive woman, taking a sudden, keen interest in you, as warned in the Bible, is common sense.

Being distrustful of all men is off, being distrustful of a man who is insincere and keeps pushing boundaries is survival instinct.

Sexists are just lazy. Within a race, there are too many personal similarities to claim a broad genetic danger.

The psychotic thing is obvious.

“The world hates women” and “The world hates men”.

Obvious bullshit, there’s moderate but clear evidence on both sides (balance) so neither sweeping statement is true. It’s another excuse. Not to try, to abuse the “enemy” group, to get perceived revenge yada yada.

It’s actually:

The world hates (substitute for Self) so I am morally allowed to (do terrible, evil thing).

Like the #KillAllMen or Elliot murder spree fans.

It’s a selfish Crusaderism. If they clashed with that group, say SJW women to anti-SJW women, they’d hate that supposed group they claim to care about, the most of all. Thatcher gets the most hatred of any dead politician because she was a woman. In a sickening display, they got the radio to play “ding dong the witch is dead” on news of her demise. The working class loved her so the Left despise her. Great men and geniuses are envied most by omegas, they plot to literally kill people, other men are just last. It’s like Marx leeching off of Engels, a man who owned means of production. Marx lived off the blood of the worker happily.

These people are dangerous and abusive.
You love the sinner and punish the saint, you are evil. Defending deviants, rapists (of m/f), whatever it is specifically. This is not First World culture. This is childish and bitter. This is anti-justice.

“We’ll show them” they plot.

The world was right to reject them, really. That’s all they showed.