Do women just hate all men? (serious)

TLDR: Yes but also no. Yes for their actions and endorsements, not for being male. It’s more resentment than hatred. Like the hippy slutty Boomers. 7,000 words.

This is going to answer some questions I believe merit being taken seriously because it ties into biology and our future.

It is brutally honest and true, whatever any woman tells you. I have no reason to lie, remember.

I think even the MGTOW types would largely agree with this assessment because it’s rooted in Darwin. Men have all the power, women are mostly sitting there. Waiting for them.

Are the men of today equal to the WW2 generation? Yes or no?
In terms of genetic fitness, we all know the answer is no.
No, they are not.
And women definitely resent this.
All the ‘vintage’ trends aren’t just longing for the ability to wear twirly dresses and high heels without falling afoul of a rapist immigrant, they subconsciously want the genetic fitness of men back. (although women are dressing androgynous to avoid attack by immigrants too, but men refuse to admit this, instead pretending they all wanted to look asexual simultaneously by fluke)
Naturally, none of them will dare tell you this. Especially the tradgirls, so-called conservathots. Do they seem happy to you? Does a bitterness creep in, much like the sad MGTOWs? They believe they’ve made a compromise out of the measly postmodern pickings. Their husband would not be their first choice, if they could get a WW2 hero type instead. All women know this and that is why modern housewives are mocked for ‘settling’. Settling for inferior quality men, not to settle down. In surveys, such women want to get married, so it’s a quality thing. Women are the gatekeepers of genetic quality in the land, men are the protectors of the land itself, remember that. Men are in denial about the sexual selection at play amongst women. All women value men for is genetic fitness. Nobody cares about bank balance if you’re so old (paternal age) you make an autistic kid. Genetic fitness uber alles. It is the reason for both to live. It is the reason for sexual reproduction. A combination of genetic fitness. So women are effectively in an arms race to claim the best man as their provider. Sperm donor means nothing or the ghetto would be doing great.

Compare current ‘men’ to those in the 1990s, then the hippies of the 1970s, the halcyon 1950s, then the WW2 tough 1940s etc. It gets worse and worse the longer you look. Do you imagine women don’t notice?
I don’t think it’s that women hate men, per se, I think sexual selection is at play and women hate what men have become. That is the fault of men and something to place fairly at their feet. The obesity rate is much discussed but most obese people are men. They have no pregnancy excuse, no Pill, no menopause. They even tried to meme it in a fat acceptance way as Dad Bod. WTF. They’re lazy slobs who love beer and wings more than their wife. Don’t be shocked when she no longer wants to fuck you, dude. If you look like a 10 month pregnant woman, she’d have to be a secret lesbian. Do you imagine women don’t comment on these developments? Women always handle men with kid gloves because a certain proportion are insane and will snap and kill people if spoken to like fellow adults, on any topic that threatens their Hollywood-built ego (masculinity is fragile, in this era, not others). When in the bathroom, complete strangers of women will just rip into other women’s husbands, including whether he looks weak (like the weeb with a waifu that has a stronger manjaw than him, and trails along behind her like a dog) or whether he got fat (liver disease, fatty liver) and predicting how long the marriage will last while her libido is trying to make it work. Women naturally have a larger body fat percentage to be healthy (T&A) so this stigma only really goes one way, especially since men cannot get pregnant. This and many other factors, women are brutal in judging. Add in cultural alcoholism giving them impotence issues (PC term ED) and how overweight men have dick shrinkage (look it up) and higher oestrogen, and there’s much to discuss behind their back because they’re not man enough to acknowledge it themselves.

It’s like how all the ugly men rally around to call one another 7s because they have a job. That isn’t how numbers work. You’re all like 2-3s to even ask that shit, brutally. We need a hot or not for men on the 10-scale, looks-only, no hiding behind income, since they would be SHOCKED. It isn’t that women are harsh in rating men. Women are realistic. Women evolved to be, sexual selection is the women’s duty. Men are answering from sexual desperation with a slutty attiude and rank women too highly, sorry. Female simps exist (called pick-mes) but they’re far rarer than men.

So we have an embittered manchild demographic who thinks they belong on a GQ cover because they aren’t as fat as their slob friends and can tie their shoes (but don’t you draft them!), with perverse tastes refined by hardcore POV fetish porn and an ego constructed by the finest of Hollywood’s Jewish minds. So far, so repulsive. Women are sure missing out on that partay.

Then consider what separates a boy from a man. It isn’t age. It isn’t whether he ‘fucks’ (nb. violent bravado terms for anything sexual are a tell of a low quality male, who is also very, very, very bad in bed*). Hollywood lies to men and tells them women want “players” (and players share this as urban legend, despite dying alone). Women do not. In studies, women want conscientious** men for ‘long-term mate selection’, who don’t have diseases and retain the ability to pair bond. Yes, what women want in husbands, men wants in wives. Imagine that. Almost like they’re made for each other. Women swoon over Mr Darcy, they ogle James Bond***. Women would not wish to marry James Bond. Look but don’t touch. He looks diseased and …sticky.
Who wants to marry a thot?

*to speak like an edgelord 13yo past the age of like, 15.
**emotional intelligence, which correlates to IQ so is very much real
***Women sexually objectify men casually more than non-pathological men sexually objectify women, they don’t just tell them about it (verbal abuse) or act any differently (groping etc). They are just looking. This is why women love to read romances and watch entire plot lines about who is getting married. They imagine the couples. It’s the visualisation, they don’t actually want it.

Thus far? As women judging Western men? (also note how female weebs describe Asian men, reconcile with above)

So we have hypocritical sluts claiming their ‘body count’ (violent term) doesn’t count (???) while they brag about defiling the potential wives of other men or hardcore porn addict wankers – so far, so repulsive. Where is the defending Western values part? Even Christian men are whores nowadays, don’t @ me. Having a girlfriend is living in sin. Women don’t look at what you say because men are the liars of the sex*, women look at actions e.g. marriage plots in a story, not proposals.

*most liars are psychopaths and most psychopaths are men, it’s science

MOVING ON—

What distinguishes men from mere males is moral authority.
To put it bluntly, modern men have zero of it.
Not little, but zero.

Look at the average partner count for men (higher than women, most sluts are men, just with a smaller group of women), look at the race-mixing data (higher in white men than women, by far) and look at the deadbeating (almost always a man abandoning his kids, not the mother). This is maths. It is incontrovertible.Women have higher sexual disgust, when studied, than men. By a very, very long shot. As in, practically speaking, women would be happy to die alone than waste their time and risk their life investing in the genetic line of a perverse degenerate aka a man they cannot (biologically) respect. Run studies specifically, you’ll see. Would they rather die alone or have kids with a man who had 5, 50, 500 sexual partners? Second study, a man who is a ‘sex tourist’ in countries with child age of consent? How do you imagine women would assess it?

The manosphere is not redpill, they are bluepill. They twist statistics to avoid responsibility on themselves. Single mothers didn’t get themselves pregnant, lads. The manosphere is so bluepill they agree with the white genocide, they agree with the immvasion and the race-mixing. They are civnats at best who believe (like postmodernists they are) that culture is a magical spell over the magic dirt of Da West and NOT the exclusive entitled homelands of white people, and when you add in lazy shit to the village well, it’s still fine to drink from! Because they got their Chinese restaurants, herpes-spreading massage parlours and slightly cheaper nanny for their abandoned baby. Magical thinking morons. That is not a Christian society any more (if it ever was). If stripper or hooker is a possible career path in your culture for your teen daughter, it is not Christian, but Satanic. This reaction to Puritanism in America is like a pendulum swing in the process of going back and cancel culture is the transition period. Cancel culture is anti-degenerate but concealed. Soon, it will be openly. Sure, women are so jealous (/sarc) of the tragedy of the commons playing out: morally, demographically, culturally and in terms of disease. Y’all sound like Boomers who moved to Thailand to be open pedos. Multiculturalism is the enemy, not Pleasure fucking Island. If you wanna go on holiday, go. Don’t IMPORT it. If you wanna live with it, move THERE, do not force your fellows and the future of your homeland to suffer your dirty hippy xenophilia. Women see men become asses and who wants to marry an ass or a class clown? Even their married men claiming to be traditional are not putting their friends aside for their families. Marriage is a commitment.Forsaking ALL OTHERS. The biggest problem with America is this homosociality, you replaced the nuclear family for it. You are not homo married to your buddies. So that’s another arrow in the quiver of why women all secretly ‘hate’ men (but not all men) and won’t ever tell them. We have men bitter on forums at 7pm that there’s no wifey making dinner for them when they get back from work, when they’re actually seeking out the company of men online instead, for spousal emotional support. That’s faggoty. Friends are not a replacement spouse, they’re like wine uncles nagging about the Boomer ball and chain anti-nuclear family rhetoric so WTF. Who wants to marry that? It’s a support group of losers, most of the time. Shouldn’t you be with your family? Why are you here writing the same ‘articles’ for decades, blaming women for male failures in gender role instead of teaching your sons not to cuck? Btw blogger is not a job. This shit is not work. You shouldn’t get paid for this. It’s an online diary. The manosphere is functioning as a homosocial cult (excluding women to profiteer from its members, financially exploitative) so naturally women are avoiding them. They don’t functionally want a woman, they want other men. Let that sink in. That’s why Youtube hasn’t removed all sorts of angry anti-white (women) males from the platform. It’s a trap. A demographic trap. A Pied Piper of anti-white men propaganda, anti-white nuclear family, anti-patriotic and pro-foreign, convincing them to castrate themselves (cutely called the snip or in behaviour, becoming child-free meninists by choice*) before the Muslims do it. Yes, let’s sign up to breed with any male dumb enough to fall for castrating himself! Ladies, don’t crowd them! Form an orderly line!

*because nothing is more attractive than a person of EITHER sex bragging about their mental problems and sterility (which is usually actually caused by STDs, so it might be a cover story)

Seriously, as testosterone levels drop thanks to porn ejaculations (yes, production is finite in sperm too) and other bad habits, why would women want them? Do you want manjaw and fat high-T athlete shouldered women? So why are you entitled to be desired by women, despite being more woman-like yourself, including the endless nagging? Women are not responsible for the West, men are. Their gender role is moral authority in a marriage. A man invented the Pill. A male college professor in America was involved in the court case to give it to an unmarried couple. The politicians who wrote the Immigration Act were men. Yet all the manosphere does is nag women, for problems caused by men.

Rape gangs? Men.
Crime rates? Men.
Murder and terrorism? Men.
Nobody getting married and breeding? Men propose — or don’t.
Weak laws? Most judges and police are men.
Stupid hiring practices? The board is run by men.
Dodgy curriculum? Who funds and runs Marxist charities informing said teachers? Even a man founded Femen. Women see this, even if you play ignorant. Men play dumb all the time to their own responsibility, their own contribution to the Fall, the hypoagency is obscene, let alone the gaslighting about it and chickens are finally coming home to roost in a way you can no longer ignore. The manosphere is a broken record and women have long since tuned out. They never want to man up. They have retarded gender development, they have never mentally grown up and it shows. There are men who are like 40-50, grandfather age, still pondering if they’re ‘ready’ to become dad to an autist. They dawdle like women. They wouldn’t even fight off an invading force to save their own lives, so if that’s a man, we deserve whatever we get from China (who is funding the Marxist universities, btw, not da white wimmin). Personally, I hope for meteor strike.

What is the function of men?
Protector. Of his kin. Of his sired family later.

No woman can nor should try to bail men out of their gender role. You won’t give birth for us so it’s actually equal. Any man complaining women have it easy? Sign up to have a womb transplanted and give birth. No? Thought not.
Suck it up, buttercup. This is the world of your making. The Mary Whitehouse types warned you this would happen. You still mock them as jealous of you. They were Cassandra. They were correct. Nobody is jealous of degeneracy. It’s an option for everyone. Young people are rejecting it. Biology is real. Government can only coddle so long. The dam threatens to break still. Hot potato is a game only Boomers are old enough to play.

What does this male gender role mean, in practical terms?
Demographic protection.
Now, an awareness of this is present in all women. All of them. Subconsciously, women respond to the facts of white minority (there are studies about a perception of threat) and strangely dressed foreigners far more than men do. Why? Women rely on men to protect them, whether it’s 999 or whatever. The men expect another man to defend THEIR family and this extends nationally and racially. They feel no investment patriotically because the police protect them, cowards, from personal threat – temporarily.

In hindsight, replacing mob justice between families with the police was a mistake. It made men soft.

Immigrant ‘gangs’ are the new ‘police’ brewing, them genociding us. Currently they only pick off the occasional man, so cuck men let it slide. Without police protection, it’d be open season on whites and they’d suddenly care, long after women and children were targeted.

The modern man (or postmodern man) is not a man at all. He is a eunuch. So many wars were fought by his forefathers, so much blood was spilled, over thousands of years, so he could happily import invaders as ‘immigrants’ (PC term) to fill his factories (class traitor) and his bed (race traitor). You aren’t an alpha if your kids look adopted, you were genetically cucked. White genes are recessive. They are less than 50% yours, I had the term on another post ages ago, ask pol. But these are facts. If you cannot get one (1) hot woman to breed with you from your own group, that is not alpha. It’s omega. Omegas will lower their standards as much as necessary (rejected by the in-group, not all groups*) and women definitely perceive this (note the white women race mixing stats). The rest is high on copium. Look at the divorce rates of such males if you don’t believe me. Again, facts. Like their mongrel’s mental illness rates. From pol/:

*so any white woman could mix, it’s always an option, the omega option

They permit immigration, which is biologically invasion so mentally women think of them as cowards. They permit terrorism attacking their sons and rape gangs attacking their daughters, so where’s the main gender role of men? Even the police and army aren’t what they once were. Men have no function any longer. They have replaced themselves. They have cucked themselves for globalism. For the Beige People NWO OWG dream of Open Borders, whether it’s encoded in law or not. Practically, it’s the same Hippy Wet Dream. Men have abandoned their post and obviously, women hate them for this. The low trust society they chose, from fear. Continuous fear. They never correct it, many go along hoping to be killed by the invaders last. They would rather die out than be called insults by their enemies.
Imagine if any of their ancestors packed up because their enemies were trying to psych them out.
The species would’ve died long ago.

Men are the rarest thing now. Even so-called chad types (sluts aren’t the same as desirable mates but k) aren’t reproducing, which is ultimately what women want from men, so from a biological perspective it’s no wonder the birth rate is down because neither party is getting their needs met, men for emotional companionship (distracted by hook-ups) and women for protection and loyalty. Also, do men even like women any more or just want a wet hole? Hook-ups are inhumane, they treat other human beings like a sex toy, like a piece of plastic. There’s nothing to envy. It’s pathetic. Mainly they are just masturbating into these women for the approval of other weak-ego men (homosocial motives). Approval-seeking is weak. Men are supposed to validate themselves and the manosphere denies them this to sell them shitty books and ‘courses’. The slutty men are incapable of making love, whatever their claims, so goes through an endless parade of pussy (called girlfriends) because they cannot satisfy a single one of them with lovemaking, which is newsflash the only thing women want, physically. Have you met a sane woman who wanted to be fucked? Who made them that way? Damage goes both ways, and the book Hooked goes into the brain damage both sexes have from sleeping around (masturbating with other people like a psychopath would). Culture is now psychopathic, so why would women respect men? It’s a culture that hates everything women love – the nuclear family, pair bonding and commitment to one’s family. Psychopaths are statistically most sluts, psychopaths are nomads who never commit and are fond of novelty like xenophilia and they deadbeat their family, if they have one. Low IQ men (misogyny is a trait of them, as previously covered)* have been permitted by morally weak smart ones to set the standard for the mores of the West. How many college educated men used it like a free brothel, instead of finding a good wife? Why did we abolish breach of promise for cads? Society is shit because men made it like this. Women only follow where men morally or immorally lead. When has a woman ever started a moral trend? In all human history? Men establish the sexual mores, women just enforce them. There is nothing to enforce now. Look in the mirror for someone to blame, you all became the 30yo Boomer meme. You wanted a global brothel, you got it. You don’t get to fuck around like a witless farm animal then act all entitled like where da virgins at? You are neither entitled to respeK. Nor to ‘trade up’ – to which crop of pristine women? It’s the r-type dream of an untouched meadow for them to corrupt and destroy like sexual squatters. Where they exist they hide from the likes of you, you beasts who walk on two feet, claiming to be men. Rutting sluts deserve rutting sluts. R-types with r-types. K-types with K-types, you can’t change it because it’s how your brain developed. There’s a cap and you cannot go back. Virgins want other virgins, ask them and reee. Their heads explode when virgins tell them they’re disgusting. They are entitled to their own kind, with zero hypocrisy, not the slobbering gross old men who caught diseases in other countries, out-breeding. Hollywood lied to you. Again, Darcy was a virgin. (So was Jesus). Do women prefer him or the degenerate cad Mr Wickham? Which one do modern women prefer too? History will remember many modern white men as spiteful race-mixing sluts, who felt entitled to a pure, patriotic woman they never earned, after wasting decades on the Club Scene. Tragedy of the commons played out sexually. The statistics will also show this. The monomyth is about earning a woman. It isn’t about slaying a dragon, it’s overcoming your own temptation to lust. Choosing her over other women by y/our personal actions (no Muh Dick excuses). Anyone can pick a favourite dish after gorging on the whole buffet table! That’s a deadly sin. Actions speak louder than words. So many claim to be traditional but we women judge by sexual history, it cannot lie. We judge other women and also men. You risk death for the hand of the fair maiden because the wages of sin is death. Boomer Peterson won’t tell you this. It’s truth.

*they resent women because women reject them for low genetic fitness. See top of this post.

Hardcore HD pornography has ruined the West and pair bonding. It goes both ways. Both men and women are lesser quality. It’s just that women have the choice, to invest in the genetics of men or not.
And they are logically concluding not.
Why breed with the weak?
Why waste resources in a low trust, survival society, on cowards? They’d abandon their children, plenty already have (deadbeating) and other men have refused to hold them criminally accountable. Indeed, they blame helpless women and chldren for BEING abandoned, in the ultimate of anti-white victim blaming. It’s like saying why was your 11yo daughter wearing a mini-skirt in London around the Muslim immigrant? Crime is the fault of criminals, this is the First World and we used to have standards. Like don’t cuck for criminals. Anyone who makes excuses for rapists (a crime women consider worse than murder) is worse than serial killer simps. At least those guys are in prison. Meanwhile the manosphere accuses even virgins (child or adult) of making up a false rape accusation, which IS a spin, knowing it’s logically impossible to prove a negative re consent. AKA they hate you. They hate the West. They endorse rape. They write entire articles about rape like pedo-enablers talking about age of consent. They try to nudge the line and talk about ‘what’s rape, really?’ Like ‘what’s a minor, really?’ It’s the same Marxist moral relativism. You wonder why so many are single, or perma-divorced?
Women do not tolerate bullshit. We didn’t have these problems in an all-white (non-genocidal) safe society. The EU has admitted to this replacement agenda on their own website in the past, Hillary Clinton gleefully used the term ‘white genocide’ on TV and the manosphere still, oddly, refuses to address the Genocide Question in all but broadest brushstrokes. No actions for correction suggested. Yet more years of navel-gazing. Controlled opps.The pig pen of bitter men.
However, women are passive, so the men are stupidly taking ages to figure it out.
Women resent men for multiculturalism.
Historically, what happens after victory in every war?
A BABY BOOM.
Controlled by the women.
You cannot expect war victory spoils when you refuse to fight the war.
And invasion means war. Check the definition. It doesn’t need weapons. We’ve been at war since the first boats from Africa coming to London in the 40s (Windrush) and in America, moreso since the Immigration Act in the 60s that basically permitted long-term constant demographic invasion ever since.
You cannot expect a white society, from an increasingly non-white demographic.
You cannot expect the comforts of a high trust society, from a low-trust multiculturalism.
If the great Roman Empire can be felled by immvasion, none of the West is exempt. Where is your Coliseum? The McMansions won’t last a single century. It took Rome longer than that to decline.
So “men” cry out for general, societal respect and the women ask, why?
Because respect is earned.
It’s based on gender role. Something you do.
Men refuse to defend their country, and indeed, side with the enemies to the sons and daughters, then, much like the Marxist Boomers, wonder why they are despised by their own kin.
This has been World Civil War, for decades now. We fought two world wars so we wouldn’t have entire boats of foreigners invading. Immigration IS invasion and invasion is immigration. This is becoming blatant as the NWO types import invaders despite supposed health risks. It’s a lie, it always was. This isn’t for your safety or economy. It’s to destroy you.
Men pretend to be asleep, it’s easier. This has higher stakes than pretending you can’t use the washing machine.
If they had the will, mass deportations would largely fix this. It could be done in a year or two. If they refuse to leave peacefully, which they know they will (even if you cut off welfare, which is cucking for foreign families), then the war would go hot and men… do not care. They’d allow their baby cousin to get bent over by invaders if they could keep the fetish porn and video games.

That’s your side, guys.

When Hillary is on your side, it isn’t patriotic.
https://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/portfolios/clinton-mentions-white-genocide/

Women know this.
Women hate them for it.
Why do you think Marxist women infantilise immigrants?
They KNOW. They know it’s a war and conscious cucking may spare them, it eases cognitive dissonance as crimes rise. Because passivity is a trait of women and gamma men.
The rise in gamma men, not culled by a hot war, is the primary problem.
Subconsciously, those lefty women know the men are threats, they know the immigrant family down the road is stealing their national resources and intending to replace them by reproduction (a form of UN genocide).
They know. But what can the women do about it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It is NOT the female gender role. Powerlessness causes mental suppression. Did they speak of a rape culture pre-immvasion? Feminists blame weak white men for the actions of immigrants they permitted to invade. They’re right about that. The rest is window dressing.
So you get soyboys online complaining, why don’t women care about politics?
It isn’t politics you milquetoast little shits, it’s basic demographics.
Why have 2.2 kids in an area of 222 Chinese? When your taxes are funding all the latter? Check foreign aid, then come back.
Women hate race-mixing, especially white women, and they despise the idea of their children doing it the most. In a low trust society, women shut their legs to reproduction.

THE OVARIES ARE CLOSED.
CLOSED FOR BUSINESS.

Rather than mix, or force their kids to.

Women are waiting for men to man up and holding the race ransom or everyone dies out. It’s very simple. It’s a strike. It isn’t safe to have kids so they won’t. Women are not obliged, even in the Bible, to get married and have a family. That’s the somewhat secular Darwinian imperative. Jesus had no children. The baby cult is rekt.

ALL the evidence points to this hypothesis and NONE against in the entire world (nor historical examples like Rome).

They won’t tell you, men need to figure it out for themselves. It’s a FITNESS TEST.

We know this from the oxytocin and patriotism link. Happy women are more patriotic (so we know for a fact male xenophiles are depressed, whatever they claim, mixing is a mantrum, it’s sexual acting-out, it’s immature). Well, much like men refusing to sign up for a military that’s pozzed, why would women risk THEIR life in childbirth to bear the weaklings of cowards?

The planners know this. The Soros types. They know. If you make the men weak, the women DO NOT MATTER.
But I’m sure the gammas love to blame them. Isn’t it weird they, like trannies, mentally identify with women more than other men? Isn’t that perverse? Kinda deviant? Why not blame other men? Boris is right there. Trying to sign us back into the EU in all but name as a ‘green’ (anti-white, pro-China) trade agreement (EEC was).

In the late stages of Roman decline, do you imagine the wives respected their husbands? You know, the men they were forced to marry or starve? Rome fucked itself by outbreeding with its slaves, with weak genes. Do not breed with those of low genetic fitness, it’s the hard rule of Mother Nature. If you fuck around, she will fuck you up.
Women sensed a culling was in order and have refused, en masse, not to have children. Because babies get you killed in a hot war. We’ve had a cold war of immvasion across the West for decades, how much longer can it last? They say civil unrest, they say community conflict and other polite terms. From a woman’s perspective, what does that look like? It isn’t safe to settle here. Women are only wandering because men are wavering. It’s a game of chicken but either way, women win. Either men clean house and reclaim the West (purging all degeneracy, however much they like it) and everyone wholesome is happy or like Delilah the women ensure the killing blow of genetic weakness ending, in a mercy killing, so subsequent generations of white people don’t need to suffer being the trafficked slaves of the invaders (paging Rotherham, already happening) because their quisling dads were Judas tier scum and left the door open. More women want the death penalty than men – for whom?

Why does the treason continue?

Because the men have some grandiose group delusions, a different form of cultish NPC.
Sure, multiculturalism will magically fix itself! MAGICALLY. And immigrants are your friends.

They’ve all adopted the selfish Boomer attitude of ‘screw you all, I got mine’.
Do you imagine the immigrants will permit you any porn or any video games? Do you imagine they’ll let you even look at ‘their’ women without putting your eyes out?
There is no Magic Dirt. THIS GOES BOTH WAYS.
Immigrants can’t become white by colonising white countries.
And the white homelands cannot remain culturally civilized and high trust while introducing people from low IQ countries (even if the immigrants themselves are white, see Italian slums about a century ago).
Unlike the Boomers, they won’t get away with their ill-gotten gains.
In Revelations, it’s noted the sinners tried to hide from God. Why? Tower of Babel. An entire lesson in the evil and anti-Christ nature of multiculturalism. Why do they beg to be hidden?
They likely played the r-type game ‘let’s you and him fight’, which is all treason really is. It’s getting the out-group to fight your battles for you. Punching down at white women, after all the immigrant rape, and excusing it, enabling it, is about as low as it gets.
Do you expect women to have sympathy for this?

Women are letting the ship go down but you lot blew the holes in the side of the boat. Cause and effect chain of events.
If the captain won’t do his job, what do you expect us to do? Literally what, mate.

What good are men if they don’t protect their women? To paraphrase Putin. Is that a man? Do those genes deserve to continue? Call it FGTOW if you like. Either way, the ovaries are closed.
All women can do is react to the moral choices of men. The choices are immoral and ongoing so we have slim pickings in terms of options. Women endorse men with reproduction, not fucking. Rutting is for the beasts. Hollywood lies. So what does this say about women’s endorsement of the current crop of men?

The birth rate (and successful marriage rate, which causes wedded births) is a function of homogeneity in a society. Deal with it.
As you increase multiculturalism, women feel more stressed in low trust society and the cortisol makes them fat, manly, angry and unwilling to have kids. The genetic, biological cascade is CAUSED by the environment. This is basic Darwin. We adapt to our environment, for survival or thriving. Now women are in survival mode, did you expect it to be pretty? Thinner? Nicer? More nubile?
Women are like other animals with the intuition, sensing impending danger. The nesting instinct is a prepper response.
Men are playing Chicken Little while enabling their own genetic destruction. They won’t be left to sit happily in the corner once outnumbered by invaders.
They are evolutionally, fatally stupid. Women cannot save them, we are not your mother and you’re no longer a little boy.
The invaders (immigrants, whatever term) once they have the numbers, will kill him and take all his stuff.
It happened in caves and it’s already happening on the micro in schools with white minorities now.
If this is how white men die out, God says they deserve it. You’re supposed to honour thy mother and father, you needn’t like them. There is a duty to protect one’s kin and homelands – from invaders. From the Tower of Babel situation, from the multicultural trading posts of Babylon and the whoredom of Sodom.
It’s literally in the book. Solomon was literally said to have a weakness for foreign women that took him AWAY from the Lord.
The good Samaritan parable is misunderstood. You do not permit them to stay. Guest right is for a guest, that is temporary. If the guest started stealing things and leeching off them (thou shalt not steal, welfare for the out-group is anti-Christ) then the reaction would’ve been different. Sell your cloak to buy a sword. Against whom? Your kin or invaders who threaten them? Love your neighbour as yourself has direct genetic implications. Thessalonians says if a man shall not work, he should not eat. Yet do men stop welfare to people with another home? Nope. They cuck. For the dual passport holders ready to bail on us, should we ever actually need them, they cuck. They literally fund the families of the genetic out-group and bleat about it to women.
In the UK, at least, white women tend to vote Conservative. Men vote Labour, see Clause 4. Men vote for Marxism. Maybe out of stupidity that they care about ‘workers’ or a hatred of hard work (no bootstraps required). Academic Agent should do a voting pattern video (since ww2) but won’t.
Men have let down the team.
You see so many expats who can’t keep their trap shut and sounds like old hags, shrewish women. You’ll be sorry doom-monger types. This is a psyop.
Take the Black Pigeon Speaks type, that love the idea fellow white people are suffering, from bombings, from rapes, from trafficking, the gleeful ‘blackpill’ reporting any other era, any other time period would’ve correctly described as treasonous.
Men have bought into multiculturalism. Women still and have always hated one another. Sisterhood is impossible. Brotherhood is temporarily possible for the smart men to replace the dumb ones (or trusting, gullible weak ones) because men are pack hunters and are erroneously viewing the out-group as potential allies, rather than historic, genetic, permanent enemies. If I were in someone’s house at 2am, I’m not there for a kind reason. Same is true at zero hour of a country, poised for a racial pogrom. The dehumanizing stage of white people has already begun. There are no Good Ones, if immigrants hated the West so much they wouldn’t be here. It’s gaslighting and it’s working.
The relational aggression between men hasn’t evolved because air transport is so novel. Men have yet to adapt. Women had to function in large groups of hundreds in primal times so relational aggression is protective of our kin. Men do not have this. Men, especially weak ones, will try to get along. Like small fish trailing a bigger one. You see entire forums where they side with their enemies to drag down their own women. Isn’t that sickening? Oh but why oh why won’t the women risk everything for them?
Why? So they can be deadbeated? So the guy can hand her the cricket bat at 2am? So he can stand idly by and forgive the immigrant who raped his 8yo daughter and the ‘immigrant’ siblings who drove the 16yo brother to suicide with hate crime style school bullying?
Why oh why don’t white women like them?
THAT’S THE IMPORTANT QUESTION HERE. WOMEN ARE SO HUGE ON SOLIPSISM OBVIOUSLY.
Statistically, most narcissists are – nevermind. [men, it’s men]

(Blackpill Bingo Game: replace all the actions of immigrants with invader and see which fits better, they even cuck for vikings now, that’s the people who raped virginal nuns if you’ll recall).

Guess we just ‘hate’ men. Not like, foreign men, but just literally all men. That makes sense. Literally every man, regardless of conduct. Regardless of religion. Regardless of moral compass and hypocrisy in deed.
Just muh All Men.
Can’t see any reasons, can you?
No, don’t see anything wrong with their conduct – according to the Marxists. They’re perfect little multicultural cucklings, cheering on their own demographic death. Their quisling anti-white behaviour is impeccable. Indeed, stand and hold open the gates as long as the invaders have an additional hole for you to fuck, while you’re fucking over your country/men financially. Then complain about ‘immigration’, to top off the sheer arrogance of it. (Patriotism is not homoerotic, man on man action, it’s white men liking white women and not foreigners, m/f).
Why not, after all? How many immigrants has Nigel Farage imported as concubines? Why would we expect consistency from men? They’re not thinking with their big head. They’re emotional.
Brotherhood in the manosphere is just a warmed over Open Borders anyway. They are not real men and women sense this. They fail in the primary gender role of men. Their ultimate purpose for their life.
Women have never wanted to open the borders (brainwashed children repeating schoolteachers do not count and anti-fa is mostly male).

So do women hate men?
They fear foreigners because if you don’t get raped, your kids will. Or your sons will have to fight a war you refuse to, at some point.
Native men?
Only the enablers, the xenophiles and the cucks. Those are all the same group, whatever differences they pretend.
Some women may be able to lie to themselves consciously (Guardianistas) but the ovaries don’t lie.
Learn from history or be a page in it.
If the West doesn’t halt the steady stream of sewage, let alone start throwing it out, don’t blame us womenfolk when everything starts to smell like shit.
We don’t hate you, per se, we hate that you’re smelling of shit. Just stop smelling of shit. Just get rid of the shit. It isn’t fucking difficult, you evolved for it. No nagging ‘but that isn’t equal, we expect to be compensated’. Living in a high trust civilization with slender nubile wives is the compensation, you morons. It doesn’t just happen. Being respected by your society is the compensation because you earned it, idiots. And nobody gets ‘compensated’ BEFORE doing the work, socialists. You do the work, THEN compensation. The peacock shows the feathers are big and healthy, THEN he gets the peahen tail. In this game of ovarian chicken, you will lose, it’s a question of whether you kill your own kind in doing so. Will white men let their omegas take them all down, out of spite? Why not voting rights ONLY to any white man married to a white woman? No? Why ever not? That’s the only tradition. This would exclude your sterile omega cucks and CCP spies (to pull a ‘Jeremy Hunt’). Women are not obliged to breed with the weak and the treasonous. There is no other viable option to women currently.
Do women hate all men?
Kinda.
We especially hate it when they import wars they’re too cowardly to openly fight.
And that’s why everyone hates Boomers, who started the spigot of pure shit.
Only to bitch and nag and whine when their grandchildren complain about the stench.

We hate navel-gazers saying women are the problem (really it’s the Asian Question, read the Census and who votes bigger gov) and when they aren’t being openly, spitefully anti-white as your local anti-fa group (they’d fit right in), it’s the futile ‘when’s the war? talk. You’re already in it. They’ve already been turned against Their Women, which is play 1 in the book of war psyops. They refuse to acknowledge this, instead going along with anti-white propaganda, when some of it flatters them. You bitches are not Nikola Tesla, you have accomplished absolutely nothing in the easiest times to be alive ever. You aren’t even drafted, little piggy. Teen boys used to beg to be allowed to serve their country and defend their homeland below proper age. Those teen boys had more honour than you ever will. Successful people don’t insult their forefathers who bravely died for them, they don’t nag about The West (you ARE the West) to suck off the funding foreigners and they don’t degrade their own women (it’s like keying your own car). Wake up and smell the propaganda drop. It smells of invader bullshit. You all lack in masculine character. Blackpill is really just Yellowpill, the Asian supremacy cucking. The NWO plan to replace Western dominance with Eastern. They admit it. Do you imagine such corrupt societies will treat you kindly? They have an excess of men, meaning there’s no use for you. When you find yourself praising the CCP just like CNN, pause to consider whether you might’ve been tricked by anti-white propaganda. Rule one in the war book is to make the enemy hate their own kind and make them hopeless. In WW2 we dropped sexually mocking papers describing how their (enemy) women preferred foreign dick. Turn them against their own culture. It 100% fits. Why do you imagine social media keeps up those twitter accounts? Those Youtube channels? Why doesn’t it take those down? It’s Marxist in method, it’s Marxist in intent and it’s Marxist in result. Use your big brain.

Women will never forgive, let alone respect and breed at historic high-trust numbers with their men, until the safety of that high trust society is restored. That is the undeniable fact of the matter.

The ones who deny the ongoing genocide much like the Red Army rapes when it’s happening to women, boys and girls before their very eyes in highly public court cases is a great reason to hate someone. If not for treason, then for what?

You can’t spell treason without reason.

Mary Whitehouse should be patron saint of 4chan, at this point. She was right before Enoch. Nobody else foresaw drag time story hour or child strippers in gay bars dressed in drag. She did. She walked so Enoch could run.
https://www.defendevropa.com/2018/news/enoch-powell-why-they-hate-him/
Politics being downstream of culture. Times are never different, people are still shit. Now men are making the same Marxist ‘mistake’ and being anti-Enochs (for ‘diversity’). There is no blackpill, there is only yellowpill. Cuckpill. Cowardpill. You don’t get to complain about your smell, other people have been able to detect it for a while. J’accuse, Judas.

Have fun being dog dads, you fucking degenerates. [This happened in late Rome too. Ask reddit.]

The sexism of circumcision

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/376074/jewish/The-Mark-of-Truth.htm

 

“Circumcision purifies and refines. It forces us to make a sacrifice. Removing the foreskin diminishes the pleasure and enjoyment of intercourse.1 We sacrifice such pleasure and proclaim that, on our scale, Divine instruction is a greater priority than self-gratification.2

 

Males could have been created without the foreskin, yet G‑d wanted us to remove it ourselves. This was to demonstrate that as we complete the physical appearance of our bodies, so can we perfect the contours of our personalities and the shapes of our souls.3″

 

1.

Midrash Tanchumah, Tazriah 5 and Sefer Hachinuch, Mitzvas Milah (The anonymous author, who identifies himself only as “a Levite from Barcelona,” was a student of the Rashba, Rabbi Shlomo ben Aderet, in the thirteenth century). Our sages further taught that circumcision is an offering to G‑d that, like a sacrifice, atones for inherent human weaknesses (Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 29).

 

2.

Classical Jewish thought has long maintained this position. However, contemporary scientific studies on this matter have failed to produce conclusive evidence either way.

Uhuh…..

3.

Maimonides in his Guide for the Perplexed, v. III, ch. 29. See also R. Bachye on Genesis 17:13.

 

Sacrificing your own kids…. but not to Moloch, don’t be silly!

https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/70775/jewish/Likkutei-Sichot-Tazria.htm

This work involves both milah, cutting the thick foreskin, and priyah, ripping open the thin membrane, which on a spiritual plane alludes to the subduing of our material desires.25 Afterwards, one must perform metzitzah (sucking out the blood), thus removing the excitement generated by material things from one’s body as a whole.”

Doesn’t sound Satanic at all…. they totally don’t need that spiritual energy…. but ‘priests’ need to do it, not surgeons or anyone with medical training and pain relief.

I covered previously studies of the medical damage involved, ripping out nerve bundles.

As a consequence, a husband cannot emotionally bond with his wife (Jewish men are oddly notorious for cheating) nor the wife with the husband (see satisfaction studies).

https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/2917521/jewish/The-Circumcision-of-Desire.htm

 

“How we relate to G‑d affects how we relate to other people. That is Hosea’s message – and vice versa: how we relate to other people affects the way we think of G‑d. Israel’s political chaos in the eighth century bce was intimately connected to its religious waywardness. A society built on corruption and exploitation is one where might prevails over right. That is not Judaism but idolatry, Baal-worship.

 

Now we understand why the sign of the covenant is circumcision, a commandment given in Tazria. For faith to be more than the worship of power, it must affect the most intimate relationship between men and women. In a society founded on covenant, male-female relationships are built on something other and gentler than male dominance, masculine power, sexual desire and the drive to own, control and possess. Baal must become ish. The alpha male must become the caring husband. Sex must be sanctified and tempered by mutual respect. The sexual drive must be circumcised and circumscribed so that it no longer seeks to possess and is instead content to love.”

Anti-men rhetoric, you again…. Is that ish like Ishtar?

Whereas Christians see husbands AS alpha males…. as does biology, because the alpha male is part of a monogamous breeding pair with an alpha female. There’s no such thing as a single alpha male.

https://www.chabad.org/kabbalah/article_cdo/aid/379485/jewish/Healing-Swollen-Ego.htm

 

The foreskin of the male reproductive organ effects his experience of marital relations in two ways: it increases his gross sensual pleasure and decreases his sensitivity to his wife by insulating him from her to a certain extent. By removing the foreskin, the experience of marital relations becomes for the man less of a narcissistic indulgence and more of a true spiritual coupling between him and his wife. Once the spiritual dimension of marital relations is allowed into the picture, it enhances the physical dimension as well. The sages of the Talmud therefore state that ideally, at least, it is the Jewish couple that experiences the truest enjoyment in marital relations.”

 

Satisfaction studies have disabused them of this notion.

 

“As originally created, the physiology of woman was such that she did not have a menstrual cycle, and the process of conceiving and giving birth did not involve any bleeding. Nor did she bleed when she first engaged in marital relations. These (as well as other) facets of life were introduced into reality as the result of the primordial sin.”

Myth, that isn’t how hymens work. Some women aren’t even born with one. You might as well appeal to humours in healthcare. Not even wrong. Why is it always a man talking about female anatomy and periods? Sit down, shut up.

It isn’t even the hymen capable of that bleeding, it’s the friction of the vagina (and its heavy blood supply) that is capable of bleeding profusely (in virgins or non-), which must be worse/more likely when the man has no idea how to make her wet in the first place (inexperienced or incompetent lovers) and has no foreskin to reduce friction naturally.

Satan really is deceiving them.

 

When a man has been circumcised of his gross sensual approach to marital relations, he retains more control over his sexual passion, and is thus less likely to succumb to them. His circumcision thus helps him not engage in forbidden marital relations, including relations with his wife during her period.”

If blood is the issue, he couldn’t screw his wife during normal spotting or pregnancy spotting, nor if she were ‘bleeding’ miniscule amounts (no blood supply) from the hymen as a virgin.

Wrong, again!

Frigidity isn’t possible with women, but the impotence (ED or whatever other term) does occur in mutilated men, as you’d also expect with mutilated women.

https://www.chabad.org/theJewishWoman/article_cdo/aid/2287938/jewish/Why-Women-Dont-Need-Circumcision.htm

They hate their sons, duh.

“Circumcision is a tangible reminder to all men that they are the masters of their bodies, that they are in control of their sexual urges.”

Gaslighting from a mother who hates you but likes her own prepuce where it is. It’s funny their demon is a sexy woman (Lilith) not a part of Christian lore. They are not master of their body, their mother is. Maybe Freud wanted his mother to get his foreskin back.

“Cutting back the foreskin represents tapering the self-centered nature of lust. It’s not only about me, but about another person’s dignity and desires. It’s not all about the pleasure that I want, but about the pleasure that G‑d wants me to have.”

This is written by a woman. Clearly.

“Perhaps this reasoning behind circumcision can account for the Talmud’s statement that women are born naturally circumcised. Generally speaking, a woman’s nature is not to dominate someone whom she desires. Studies show that female sexual predators make up such a small percentage that there is little known about them as a group.1 Although women may have many imperfections, it seems that they are naturally less in danger of violating the dignity of others through their lustful impulses.”

Then why are most rapists circumcised, when it’s measured?

“Both men and women are entrusted to serve G‑d with dignity and consciousness. At the core of this service is the challenge to infuse meaning into the most mundane aspects of our life. To imprint the covenant on our physical body. And perhaps it is in this arena that women are naturally gifted. This gift of “natural circumcision”—the perspective of fluidity between the holy and the mundane—empowers (and obligates) women to become leaders. In the era preceding the global redemption, when the schism between what is worldly and what is G‑dly will vanish, feminine leadership is vital.”

Women also have a prepuce. It evolved in both sexes for biological purposes, including pleasure.

Does she own shares in a lube company?

She basically admits that partially castrating men keeps them in line as husbands (less adultery, in theory*) and makes them less masculine (well, yeah). That isn’t FOR them….

*Since they can’t bond with the wife, they seek other people.

Also, the American divorce rate is tied to circumcised men. As they get older and “need” Viagra (like Israel, how odd!) they start to doubt the wife’s attractiveness, as does she, causing separation.

A guy says about “rupturing the hymen” as women’s circumcision in the comments…. no. Not how it works. In the rare cases a woman has no gaps in hers, it must be surgically perforated to allow menstrual blood out. It goes from an antibacterial barrier for the safety of a baby to ….a more flexible antibacterial barrier. It only disappears from easy sight once a woman has given birth for the first time. Even in virgins (say a nun), it does break down over time, it isn’t just exercise, time itself thins it because, again, no blood supply. 

That’s why surgeons can cut it with a scalpel to release old menstrual blood and the girl won’t bleed to death.

It’s kinda like those extra fingers that naturally drop off.

Women aren’t even born with the same thickness of membrane, it ages uniquely between women, so this discussion is really stupid. Women aren’t all the same, medically!

Well obviously men can be raped

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-49057533

it’s just far less common due to the higher upper body strength of male attackers to females (easier pickings)

but like many rapists, the female (or unstudied, more common male on male) kind will incapacitate the victim if they can (proving intent) with alcohol, other drugs or physical restraints, like the male-to-female counterparts

“Another is that men view all sexual opportunities with women as positive.” more Jewish lies

“In fact, Weare says, “an erection is purely a physiological response to stimulus”.” they get it for no reason during sleep…. more porn lies that physical arousal = mental consent. Women are wet most of the time, it’s just the body keeping everything running, but porn lies.

“Men can obtain and sustain an erection even if they’re scared, angry, terrified etc,” she says. – more likely, especially in children or virgins or someone with a moral reason to object like religion, because fear is physical arousal.

Men own their own bodies, it should be assumed they do not give consent, that’s how the system works. Legally, the assumption is no. Like a bank can’t take your money assuming you consent. The military can’t deploy you assuming you consent to join. Porn has gaslighted white men into thinking their only value is sex toy for cheap women.

The only legitimization of consent that worked was the traditional society solution of marriage. But rape by fraud has always been illegal, including where the non-consent (because all consent has conditions, like the person being who they claim, certain contraception being used etc) was known by both parties at the time.

But consent doesn’t hold up outside an honour society, especially when sexual predators are also compulsive liars.

The ignorance about biology is intentional, blame the victim.

“There’s also research that shows women can respond sexually when they are raped (e.g. have an orgasm) because their body is responding physiologically. This is an issue for both male and female victims that is not discussed enough, but there is clear evidence in this area.”

forced orgasm is not pleasant, for either sex, it’s actually a form of pain, physical and mental

(((porn))) lies

this is about as surprising as the knee hammer test causing a reflex kick

for the same reasons, reflex, nerves

even electricity can stimulate men to orgasm, the pain of extreme electricity too

not that it’s common in female cases, they just are physically capable of it because stress tenses muscles

again quelle surprise

the brain cannot shut off the spine, it’s biologically impossible

A number of the participants in Weare’s 2017 study reported FTP experiences after getting extremely drunk or high, and being unable to stop what was happening.

In the first world, people should be able to get drunk without being raped.

Or what’s the first world?

One of those interviewed for the new study describes going home with a woman after a night out clubbing, and blacking out after being given what he suspects was a date rape drug. He says he was then forced to engage in non-consensual sex.

That could’ve turned into an kidney murder story too. Clubbing is really hunting grounds for some r-types. Hold the bars responsible for the drugs. Sometimes the bartender’s in on it.

Although (anti-white) misogynistic murderers/rapists (future serial killers) have a new excuse: “sex games”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/25/fatal-hateful-rise-of-choking-during-sex

while no human can actually ‘consent’ to be murdered, attempted or otherwise

it reminds me of the dysmorphia people who want to be blinded or have their legs chopped off

their consent isn’t valid for self-harm

and the “I was just following orders” excuse has never flown

they say porn has no influence on behaviour but it should clearly be banned, trafficking issues aside

it’s (((their))) way of ruining families and marriages with global mental competition.

The Bible clearly states looking at another with lust is adultery. Porn is un-Christian and clearly Satanic (all the violence kinda hints).

The misogynist murderers like the kink excuse because 1. it’s something to brag about in this sick world and 2. it humiliates the innocent woman. It also implicitly tries to justify what was rape – of them while alive or as a corpse, obviously they’re admitting to necrophilia. And the charges are being REDUCED for that.

All rapists are r-types, sexually aggressive up to cruelty, just write laws that punish r-types and leave the good men and women alone.

I assumed the men being raped also exhibited the researched (and linked here) “freeze” behaviour?

in women, the post-trauma freeze response leaves more semen inside, increasing the probability of pregnancy.

Another describes being coerced into sex while working at a holiday camp one summer, while he was a student. A female co-worker had discovered a letter he had written to a boyfriend, and threatened to out him as gay unless he slept with her.

Coercion vitiates consent, still rape.

As for the fantasy line, lad culture is toxic to young men (funded by magazines pushing holidays on men) and it’s also impossible to have a fantasy (controlled) about something you do not control (an attack). What those ones actually have is a domination fantasy, inaccurately and immorally described as ‘rape’.

The choking thing is a Muslim fantasy, however. Nobody will study that.

The bloodletting extension is Jewish, like that creepy comic writer in America.

Strangulation – fatal and non-fatal – “squeezing”, “neck compression” or, as some call, it “breath-play” – is highly gendered. On average, one woman in the UK is strangled to death by her partner every two weeks, according to Women’s Aid. It is a frequent feature of non-fatal domestic assault, as well as rape and robbery where women are the victims. It is striking how seldom it is seen in crimes against men.

misogynists, as well as being would-be rapists (opportunity or not) also have fantasies of murder they eventually want to act on

it’s been known since Jack the Ripper

Numerous studies have shown that non-fatal strangulation is one of the highest markers for future homicide, which is why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and most US states have developed preventative legislation to strengthen police, prosecutorial and sentencing policies that surround it. In most US states, for example, it is now compulsory for police to charge strangulation assaults as felonies. Yet in the UK, they can fall under battery – the mildest assault possible.

so is a bruise, for comparison

since they love choking so much, bring back hanging

what’s good for the goose is good for the gander

Susan Edwards, a barrister and law professor, has spent decades fighting to make strangulation a stand-alone offence.

21st century.

“In the UK, it’s routinely minimised at every level,” she says. “It’s presented as a momentary loss of control. Attempted strangulations often leave no visible injury and fatal cases too frequently end in light sentences. You hear things such as ‘lover’s tiff’. A cardiac arrest can occur within seconds during strangulation, so there’s also the defence that strangulation wasn’t the cause of death.”

hypoagency in misogynists, imagine my shock

“women are the weaker sex, which is why you need to dominate them with violence”
“I didn’t mean to kill her your Honour! it was only attempted!”

And now, a new defence has been added to the mix – consent. Fiona Mackenzie, an actuary, set up We Can’t Consent to This following the outcry over the so-called “rough sex killing” of Natalie Connolly, 26, by her millionaire partner John Broadhurst, 40. Despite the victim having 40 separate injuries, including serious internal trauma, a fractured eye socket and bleach on her face, Broadhurst received a sentence of three years, eight months for manslaughter.

Bleach on her face trying to dispose of the body. For those not in the know.

Do not defend a psychopath MO.

“People were talking about this defence as if it was one isolated incident and I knew it wasn’t,” says Mackenzie. Although English law does not recognise consent to choking – or any physical harm – in the context of consensual sex, the Labour MP Harriet Harman has just announced her intention to have this underlined again in the forthcoming domestic violence bill. “It needs more emphasis because defence teams are increasingly offering it up, maybe because rough sex has crept into the mainstream,” says Mackenzie. “I’ve had so many women get in touch to say they have been horrified on Tinder dates by partners who have choked them during sex. If you’re dating, it’s expected of you and if you don’t go along with it, you’re boring.”

not consenting to attempted murder

PUAs are rapists, more proof – because she can’t withdraw consent if she cannot talk.

No really, that’s a given reason. I’ve seen on forums they claim it works because she can’t tell you to stop.

“But the next thing I remember is waking up gasping for breath with him on top of me. I’m not sure how long I passed out for. I booked an Uber at 6.30am to get the hell out of there. The next day, I saw the bruises on my chest. We spoke after this and all he said was that, ‘we both got a bit carried away’.”

You have to go to A&E, brain damage possible with any ‘passing out’.

Blaming her, yep, PUA. It’s incitement to attack women in many cases, including overt advice to choke a woman to display ‘alpha’.

At what point does stupid trip over into evil?

“Both those women were very young, and very drunk, killed by much older men they had met just hours before,” Mackenzie says.

Textbook sexual sadist.

There’s going to be a register, isn’t there?

But, historically, it has been “niche” and an overwhelmingly male pastime.

More diversity imported from the gays. Many killers in old studies were actually homosexual…. coincidence?

Hedonists are never ever satisfied, they’ll keep pushing the boundaries of alleged ‘kink’ until society shoots them or they die.

 eventually led to section 63 of the 2008 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, making it illegal to possess an extreme pornographic image which included acts that threaten a person’s life. However, the cases that have come to court have been ones involving bestiality or child abuse. “It’s not used for scenes of violence, strangulation and rape, which is what was intended,” says Edwards.

A person who wants to murder you does not want sex, they want to murder you. Put the magazines and porn sites up on charges too. That porn is basically a mid-cancelled snuff film.

 The sex game gone wrong was something the police or Crown Prosecution Service came up with, not the defence. “It felt that the police thought she had somehow asked for it,” says Sarah. “The ‘sex game gone wrong’ story was a way of blaming everyone and no one.” The sleeping man was found not guilty. Nothing was ever explained.

will this be the Clinton’s excuse? Andrew’s?

Well done America

New law will force child sex abusers to pay for their own castration before being released from jail

Needs to be surgical, however, and all rapists, considering criminal versatility this would reduce overall crime.

No half-measures.

A new law will force pedophiles whose victims were under 13 to pay for their own castration before they’re released from jail. The HB 379 bill was signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey Wednesday after being introduced by Republican State Representative Steve Hurst. It will see child molesters undergo chemical castration, with drugs used to suppress their sexual urges. Anyone who refuses to do so will be considered in violation of their parole and kept in prison.

They want to let the pedos out, this is an excuse.

And lower age of consent to 13.

Obviously.

Explaining the reasoning behind the controversial proposal, Hurst told CBS42: ‘They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime. ‘I had people call me in the past when I introduced it and said don’t you think this is inhumane?

Forcing rape victims to carry to term is inhumane. The trauma of any rape victim is inhumane.

It’s discrimination based on age, this cannot be lawful.

The rapist clearly cannot be trusted to use their organ in a legal manner.

If there’s a way to do it surgically to female pedos, them too.

Everyone on the rapist’s side should be on some kinda list.

‘I asked them what’s more inhumane than when you take a little infant child, and you sexually molest that infant child when the child cannot defend themselves or get away, and they have to go through all the things they have to go through. ‘If you want to talk about inhumane – that’s inhumane.’

God didn’t say one rape was okay.

Half measures are evil.

Day before 13? Evil. Day after? Go ahead. WTF.

Rape victims in general cannot defend themselves, they tend to freeze, it’s been studied.

A total just world fallacy requiring telepathy, precognition and super strength.

Let’s leave him drunk in a bath-house and see if he can ‘get away’.

Sometimes people narrowly avoid it but they’re still traumatized and the predator is still a danger.

Hurst has also claimed that his bill could deter pedophiles from targeting children, and reduce the number of child sex offenses taking place.

Yeah make them target adult women and make rape babies.

What trauma?

A woman only deserves legal protection and sympathy prior to age 13, right?

Also, if they can control who they target, it’s fully intentional, premeditated predation and the cure is a rope.

But Alabama attorney Raymond Johnson is among those who oppose it. He thinks existing punishments are sufficient. Johnson explained: ‘They’re going to challenge it under the 8th Amendment Constitution. ‘They’re going to claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment  for someone who has served their time and for the rest of there life have to be castrated.’

These people are subhuman and cannot be rehabilitated.

God never said such people could be pure, the sentence was death.

Sexual sadists are not fully human, the neuroscience is clear.

Man ‘found with 21 severed vaginas’ in his freezer appears in court

Castrate them – before they do it to you.

Male suicides up because of Netflix

You only figured they hate us after the child porn ‘scandal’? Really?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890856719302886

The release of 13 Reasons Why was associated with a significant increase in monthly suicide rates among U.S. youth aged 10 to 17 years. Caution regarding the exposure of children and adolescents to the series is warranted.

Were they mostly white too?

Caution? Fuck caution, I want arrests. This was incitement.

Since it involves gory scenes of criminal acts, children shouldn’t be anywhere near it.

I don’t think you can accurately claim women as the hysterical over-emotional sex when males commit more self-murder, a crime, as well as other murder. This is clearly irrational self-destruction, in its most literal sense.

So you often see men murder their own children before themselves, because it’s all murder.

From the PDF:

Imitation may have contributed to the increase in the male youth suicide rate after the release of 13 Reasons Why, given a male adolescent character made a serious suicide attempt by firearm at the end of the series. A well-known gender paradox in suicide also exists, with male rates of suicide being higher than female rates and female rates of attempted suicide being higher than male rates across the lifespan.

Across lifespan – so…. duh. Control for that and it vanishes.

Self-murder must be shamed, (possibly mocked*) and legally punished (like France confiscating all of their belongings), romanticizing it and showing examples makes it more probable (Werther effect).

Degeneracy includes cultural or self-indulgence of self-destruction.

This is toxic. This is actively corrupting the young. That is a crime when we call it grooming.

And the idea of kids not being influenced is a blatant lie, fathers doing this should be ashamed too.

“Serious” attempt – all of them? Like, taking the male example, this is the worst example a provider can provide.

It’s the least masculine thing possible, stop trying to sex it up, Hollywood!
[Note: many so-called men who commit ‘suicide’ when others rely on them also refuse the prospect of a draft and won’t join the military, this cowardly fact demonstrates how it’s purely self-indulgent and not plain psychiatric ‘suffering’ because we have medications for that.]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804892/

The current study aimed to examine whether a family history of suicidal acts predicts severity of suicide attempts.

It does.

Of all the examples of a provider, offing yourself in mildly difficult times (globally, historically, economically) is a disgrace.

Let’s not mince words, I don’t when women are at fault either. Snowflakes go home.

Social learning theory holds that we must hold these criminals responsible.

It is a disgrace and the word needs to come back into usage. If you take on a responsibility (spouse, kids) then you’d better damn well not ragequit because you racked up credit card bills on showing off to the neighbours. WTF.

Responsibilities are called commitments for a reason.

A free man with no commitments? Different but no less toxic culturally.

A man who is setting examples and has people who depend on him to survive? Like a stay at home mother who can’t get back into the workforce? Fuck you for saying that’s a ‘choice’. That’s a weak man. Don’t take on what you don’t want to be responsible for. We must hold men accountable as the head of the house if they take on that role. 

No half-arsing, blaming women or complaining it’s ‘hard’ like they’re down a coal mine farting black.

They abuse their gender role by claiming to have all the accountability and then wimping out like a child** (adultery/cucking, divorce, abandoning kids, substance abuse, domestic violence), when it turns out to be harder than glamorous 50s postcard martini sipping after work. Fucking DUH. I’d be interested in a study of father and mother history because I’d assume the father’s suicide to have a larger effect (being the provider).

**We must expect men to be men again. Penis doesn’t qualify. Nobody will respect you on the basis of chromosomes, male of female. This is silly. Those delusional ones appeal to a time that has never existed (Biblical times tested men and failures resulted in death).

I’ll bet the number of ‘successful’ suicides among males disproportionately came from the under-diagnosed male borderlines. Put that information out there, not ‘killing yourself as revenge’ propaganda.

I almost think the MRAs like other men offing themselves, they seem giddy to talk about it. Oddly, they never want vulnerable men to obtain diagnosis and treatment before that point so either they logically want to abuse the situation for attention (a borderline trait) or they hate their fellow man so much they perversely see less competition for women as a good thing? It’s twisted but destroying your own sex is still sexism. Corrupting them and filling their head with tall tales about how great suicide is, that’s standard sociopath or borderline fare.

Such males replace the father, who usually wasn’t around.

MRAs would have no following were it not for deadbeats.

The superego forms based on what your parents do and society accepts.

The Suicide Paradox (Rebroadcast)

Even reporting suicide can prime (already weak) people into doing it (so the porn violence thing must occur, among others).

Glamorizing it is blatant incitement, like the pathetic Elliot attention*. Rich entitled kid can’t buy love, news at 11.

or Mixed race guy ask where the white women at? or Idiot tries to demand respect.

So much so-called masculine media glamorizes suicide too (WW1 films, 300) that toxic masculinity, if properly defined, would align closely to degeneracy as it is used to weaken men specifically.

Literally, to degenerate man.

‘Toxic masculinity’ is the Left’s way of referring to male self-destruction. With different ideals, for Marxist, anti-natal purposes. The premise of degeneracy has been true since late-stage Rome. Very Zeus. Terrible father, husband, angry drunkard, bored, vain, foolish rapist.

Just like ‘toxic femininity’ is fake nice, also valuing itself by promiscuous sexual attention and wants to conceive only to murder the baby post-birth. Very Lilith. Same vices, with the genders switched.

Both sexes deserve positive, strong examples. The ancients didn’t respect Zeus because he had a beard and they didn’t respect Lilith for having breasts. They mocked their deities constantly for their human flaws. All Zeus did was sit around waiting to get offended. Original broflake.

Goethe was harsher than I’m being:

And now you want to hold a writer accountable and condemn his work, which, misinterpreted by a few dim-witted souls, may have rid the world of a dozen idiots and ne’er-do-wells who didn’t know any better than to blow out the weak remainder of what little light they had!

Don’t hold others accountable for idiots’ actions.

Count it in the crime stats.

Don’t glamorize male death nor incite it.

It’s almost like humanity NEEDED war as a pressure release valve for the rest of the time.

Ask yourself: are the men who kill themselves in the most peaceful time of human history capable of providing for a family, in any reality? When we mess with natural selection, nature has a funny way of course-correcting, although many suicides are likely preventable.

If society were a meritocracy, some people will lose out. They’re just louder now.

Feminine brain, youthful brain

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/womens-metabolic-brain-age-around-three-years-younger-mens-180971425/

Predictable.

“New research suggests that women’s brains stay energized well into old age, making their brains appear about three years younger than men’s of the same chronological age.”

Given

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/

Linked in first:

https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/01/29/1815917116

Men didn’t evolve to live long, so it isn’t so much remarkable that women live longer with healthier brains but men,  to be competitive with other men in youth and war, age terribly simply because so few would survive there’s no evolutionary pressure.

Some tough choices ahead for the cooties crowd.

Stick to imaginary phantasms of 20th century masculine superiority solely intended to run up credit debt or actually be healthier.

Here comes the academese:

“Researchers remain uncertain why such metabolic differences exist”

EVOLUTION.

“It’s not that women’s brains seem to age slower than men’s,”

Literally is.
Watch the twist.

“Rather, it seems that women’s brains start off at a younger age when they reach adulthood, and they keep that throughout the remainder of their adulthood, basically buying them a few extra years.”

Not how it works. At all.

It’s like saying you start a race at the finish line, words have meanings.

If they’ve reached adulthood, they’ve reached adulthood. You can’t change the meaning to be quantum. Women mature faster (partially from earlier puberty and slower, longer sum development time because of that) and go on to metabolically age better because testosterone is known to burn out the system.

Gradual puberty + lower T = good for long-term brain health.

aka Not women’s fault. Help your fellow men. Maybe that explains why celibates like Tesla (who, let’s face it, probably didn’t masturbate), who kept their T-levels low as a result, lived longer and stayed lucid. Maybe that’s why monks live longer too, staying sharp. Male chastity has observable benefits.

The autobiographies of genius seem to evidence longer average puberty, too. The sensitive kid who’s a later bloomer?

The Victorians called masturbation self-abuse because the compulsion/addiction would tend to be co-morbid with other mental problems, including depression. How many porn addicts are depressed?

And what do they do to self-soothe because (someone) tells them it’s unanimously ‘good for you’?

Even nuns tend to live longer which does point to lower testosterone being a pre-requisite for a long life, neatly explaining why male levels gradually lower. It isn’t like evolution is picking on men. Aggressive animals have shorter lifespans across species. This is the price of being the protector/provider sex.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/men-too-much-testosterone-linked-to-shorter-lifespan-112213

“Overall, men with circulating testosterone levels between 9.8 to 15.8 nmol/L range tended to live the longest.”

Men are entitled to know what their healthy levels should be, study them!

Men age faster cognitively, he’s like a magician trying to switch your attention onto women when there’s a medical problem with men.
Assuming they want to live long and prosper.

Like, sorry, if that’s a sexist assumption.

“Previous studies have found that aging women often exhibit stronger reasoning, memory and problem-solving skills than males of the same age. But it’s unclear whether this trend is related specifically to metabolism or to a different aspect of brain function.”

Hormonal interaction.

“This might mean women are a little bit more resilient to certain aspects of brain aging in general, but it could also introduce certain vulnerabilities,”

Lying liar. Not even one example? How can you try to spin a youthful brain as a bad thing?

Women aren’t so much MORE resilient (although oestrogen helps) but men are MORE fragile.

HELP THEM.

“Having a younger brain for longer could make the brain more vulnerable to certain things as well.”

Still no mention of men? This isn’t a woman’s issue, there’s nothing new here as stated, women already perform better as a known overall finding*, he totally ignores what men need because it involves admitting they aren’t the best at something….

These arrogant men are sex traitors. Their ego won’t let them admit men need help. So have fun with higher neurodegeneration risk because one guy won’t admit he’s not #1 at everything.

Men are not the control group, it’s the mean between both groups.

Basic category error and erroneous maths.

Hubris is a deadly sin. Treating male ill-health like it’s normal will literally kill men.

OT but relevant:

If we took men as the control, the shorter male lifespan is not only normal but hinted at being desirable, you don’t want to change the norm, with women being unusually longer-lived (greater distance from norm). Actually, the average is between the groups, again. The difference from the norm is smaller, easier to broach and bring those below it up to speed.

*Because unlike IQ studies, they can’t conveniently ‘exclude’ the left-side of the male bell curve to skew their findings dishonestly. This happens after they sample from middle-class academia pupils largely from suburban populations, a huge bias/filter itself.

Sure, throw other men under the bus and blame women for biology. Sexism both ways!

Reminder:

Bitch lit

If Roosh V were a woman, he’d have written this book.

Best page screencap to illustrate my point:

amazon.com/Nice-Just-Place-France-Everything/dp/1451687761

Nice is Just a Place in France: How to Win at Basically Everything by The Betches

I don’t know whether I love or hate this book because parts of it are either spot-on or dead wrong.

If you want to know where much degenerate propaganda is aimed at women – getting a husband books.

That’s the reward. Unfortunately, they seem to be correct, men do marry the sluts generally.

This book opens (you can read it online) by slagging off virtuous women as losers.

“Nicegirls”.

That isn’t the wrong end of the stick, it’s two sticks that look alike.

Being a doormat isn’t a virtue but good people do have generally better lives (conscientiousness studies).

If you ignore the degenerate sections it’s pretty funny.

I think the MRAs would love this book to justify their misogyny, that alone is worth the price.

Because their brand of sexism is vindicated by …another.

To avoid the bitches or stop them stealing your husband, you must know how they think.

Either buy bitch lit or befriend them. I know my choice.

Video: The 9 traits of the borderline personality

Male or female.

The instability (emotional) is the BIG one.

Much like a psychopath, they cannot hold down a (healthy) relationship. Bonds between a couple must be stable.

However, like a codependent, they feel they’re nothing without someone, ANYONE.

Stop and start. Stop and start. Lots of small connections, one night stands.

The typical one night stand (m/f) has a far higher chance of being borderline.

Lashing out at anyone rejecting them, however trivial.

Yep, the angry phone number guys. The occasional woman who gets angry if a random man doesn’t want to fuck her. The entitlement.

Borderlines DO NOT DO rejection. It’s a main trigger.

They have no self to fall back on. Obsessed with self-improvement, no identity though. Constantly trying new things that never seem to work out (think Madonna’s looks). Lots of “bad luck” with the opposite sex. Tendency to idolize others, have idols, especially online. They gain a sense of self via this Other. The stans who can delude themselves into stalking, harassing or raping their idol, dangerous people. A courtship disorder is possible or simple limerence at a distance. Feeling a sense of ownership, viewing other humans as objects or property.

Vengeful, rage tantrums, can attempt to justify abuse with some imagined or minor slight.

You provoked me” or “you made me hurt you” or “why can’t you behave”?

That would be the classic “bunny boiler” or “disturbed young man” type.

It’s common to hear, “I own you” …. they actually think this.

Both are big on gaslighting so can be confused with a narcissist, which actually isn’t (usually) as bad.

It’s the men who ask to an abused woman “what did you do to make him hit you”?

Classic BPD, sick bastards. They never man up, nothing is ever their personal fault, even the actions of their own body don’t feel like they belong to them. When they picture themselves as the man (issues with empathy for the opposite sex), they assume the man was never at fault, even if he threatened murder.

They will FIND an excuse to hurt.

“I’m the real victim here”, as the other party is bleeding and traumatized in the corner.

They can seem glib like the psychopath or narcissist and can be at times grandiose with narc features. However, it’s an act, usually in response to attention. It’s fake. Their come-down is when this reality hits them again, which can look bipolar. They claim to be depressed when they don’t want to do something, a lot of small compulsive lies.

A rollercoaster of emotional bullshit. Like psychopaths, they deny their own condition but ALSO spread outright lies about it (we’re nice really, we’re the real victim, we suffer,  pity us, you can fix us etc).

The logical reply is “wait, if you don’t have it, how do you know so much about it?”

This makes them angry. You wouldn’t like them when they’re angry (they can intimidate by threatening this “loss” of temper, which is a deliberate choice to abuse). Adults don’t lose their temper, toddlers do, because toddlers are still developing the brain areas to control it.

Anger isn’t really an emotion, it’s an impulse. They have issues, emotion is quite healthy but being angry all the time is bad for your body. The Bobo dolls study and others show feeding anger makes it stronger and more frequent. “Let it all out” applies to tears, not physical abuse. Angry people get an endorphin rush, abusers enjoy abusing.

Like the psychopath, they study a lot online of how normal people think. They can quote forum posts to act normal or pass for intelligent, to lure in victims. It’s vapid trivia masquerading as knowledge.

A dichotomous view of life that is too shallow to withstand scrutiny.

e.g. all men are rapists/assholes v. all women are whores/crazy.

The common denominator there….

See, they find it helpful to define themselves in terms of what they’re not.

They deny their Shadow Self and project it, it’s stereotypical they claim they’re incapable of that Evil Terrible Terrible Thing. But the Enemy is FULL of it, to bursting! It’s so obvious!

Race they belong to generally but self-loathing can present if encouraged.

Sexism is far more common because of parental issues.

So it’s the misogynist who says

“I’m not sexist, I just don’t trust or believe or respect women.

OR

For balance, the misandrist who says

“I’m not sexist, I just don’t like or rely on or hang around men.”

It can present in so many ways but they’re blind to it, having projected it far, far away from what they believe is physically possible.

Anyone who thinks it’s impossible to be sexist personally, ever, at any point, is living in a bubble. Prejudices exist in all humans.

Being suspicious of all women is dodgy, being suspicious of a seductive woman, taking a sudden, keen interest in you, as warned in the Bible, is common sense.

Being distrustful of all men is off, being distrustful of a man who is insincere and keeps pushing boundaries is survival instinct.

Sexists are just lazy. Within a race, there are too many personal similarities to claim a broad genetic danger.

The psychotic thing is obvious.

“The world hates women” and “The world hates men”.

Obvious bullshit, there’s moderate but clear evidence on both sides (balance) so neither sweeping statement is true. It’s another excuse. Not to try, to abuse the “enemy” group, to get perceived revenge yada yada.

It’s actually:

The world hates (substitute for Self) so I am morally allowed to (do terrible, evil thing).

Like the #KillAllMen or Elliot murder spree fans.

It’s a selfish Crusaderism. If they clashed with that group, say SJW women to anti-SJW women, they’d hate that supposed group they claim to care about, the most of all. Thatcher gets the most hatred of any dead politician because she was a woman. In a sickening display, they got the radio to play “ding dong the witch is dead” on news of her demise. The working class loved her so the Left despise her. Great men and geniuses are envied most by omegas, they plot to literally kill people, other men are just last. It’s like Marx leeching off of Engels, a man who owned means of production. Marx lived off the blood of the worker happily.

These people are dangerous and abusive.
You love the sinner and punish the saint, you are evil. Defending deviants, rapists (of m/f), whatever it is specifically. This is not First World culture. This is childish and bitter. This is anti-justice.

“We’ll show them” they plot.

The world was right to reject them, really. That’s all they showed.

Men/women, nothing to fix!

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/how-do-we-fix-relations-between-men-and.html

Anyone who claims to know how to fix, or even significantly to improve, the relationships between men and women by changing The System is in fact on the side of the enemy.

Male, female, claiming to be progressive, claiming to be traditional.

It reminds me of a quote from that cuck John Green

‘Some tourists think Amsterdam is a city of sin, but in truth it is a city of freedom. And in freedom, most people find sin.’

Sure, the “freedom” in slavishly following your impulses….

Reminds me of

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/crisis-actor-useful-concept.html

Professional activists always want the gravy train to keep chugging.

You can’t trust any of them. Yes, even the ones you like are capable of lies.

An e-celeb is not your friend.

Don’t listen to the manosphere on women

It’s like asking an SJW about being a stay-at-home mother, they avoid it and they’re hostile so if you wanna marry with kids do not ask a group of perma-bachelor genetic suicides.
They might be good on other topics, like finance and hobbies, but they project all their failures away on this little one so it’s completely 180 ass-backwards wrong. You get male spinsters in their 30s demanding a 17yo Russian virgin they couldn’t even pull at the male physical peak, 18.
It’s the core topic they go on because they’re secretly obsessed (like the MGTOWs on female websites) about but it reminds me of the men who visit hookers and insist they’re good with women. Maybe because in many cases, that is them. They’re too stupid to know the women they solicit are whores. Do you want advice from that guy?
Consider the common complaints – women ruin everything (cue rattle throw), we have data proving it and state spending favours women.
Why?
Well, they ignore all the data they don’t like, do not seek out data which might prove their false faith false and fail to account for the male half of the fucking equation e.g. men don’t marry so women get pregnant out of wedlock, the rise of deadbeats and imagine if we stopped spending on women. Aside from being literally sexist because women pay taxes, no more free birth control. Would this make them happy, or sad?
I don’t think it takes a genius to figure that one out.
No free STD shots for men and no abortions for the consequence dodgers.
Happy or sad?
I think they’d riot, frothing at the mouth, right alongside the ghetto.
And they’re just as bad as the feminists, for producing children and then wishing to murder them rather than spend time and money caring for someone, it’s a damaged human you’re dealing with.
So they don’t really hate single mothers, it’s the narcissism of small differences, many produced them by failing their spouse (if you lead the house, alpha man) and divorcing. They’re just the male equivalent of the angry feminazi who wants more money for themselves and narcissist who wants all other groups to suffer, a bitter shell of a person with a thin sense of esteem and cheap ideas. As you might notice, that selfishness is the root of their problems.

You can’t ask an inferior person about how to be better than average.
Emphasis on You Go Girl?
Emphasis on You Go Galt.
~It fits!
The men need a woman like a fish needs a bicycle!
The free market cost of fucking around is a shotgun wedding, you stupid motherfuckers. Please explain how you plan to dodge in that case.


Would this make them happy, or sad?
If the Government stopped bailing out their dick.
I agree, we should stop bailing everyone out. Starting with men, because their gender role is provider.
I have a game where friends screencap me interesting Youtube comments.
Right click to open image and delete anything after a ? to see full size.
Inspired by a man’s post, sent to me by a man.

~~~slowest of claps~~~

Someone looked for negative evidence! A man of humility/quality!

Manning up refers to a series of useful actions, not text game scripts.

Ruined narcissists are only contented if they ruin those who come after them. They burned out, as player burnout widely attests, it’s a dead-end and so they now crawl like worms after women young enough to be their daughter or grand-daughter? They encourage vulnerable young men to do the same, under the guise of loving them and saving them from their instincts. Like the 70s feminists do with women.

The sexual revolution was for men because sex is all the low quality men wanted. They’re now pajama boys, porn addicts and general wastes of space creating nothing of civilizational value. 

If you only associate with the trashy women, 1. you are trash people, you don’t get to use the word degenerate as a pejorative and 2. you have no right to comment on non-trash, which is the majority if you look at say, the stats on US college sluts (only 20-30%). For the same reason you don’t ask a fat person for exercise advice.
The data they hide is the data that shows they lie.