More evidence against hybrid vigour

By definition, two species cannot breed (naturally, don’t @ me with IVF ‘struggles’). It’s been found genetically before that speciation is increasingly occurring between the modern human races. This happens to all races and is how species are formed.
“Far from established fact” it’s literally the Darwinian meaning of the term. If you misuse it, you are just wrong.

Two races? Yes. I’m hardly shocked at the race denialism. The proof is right there, you are wrong.
I’m not shocked the hybrids died out, likely from infertility or childbirth deaths.
It’s been well known there was interbreeding in the edges of Europe.
However, notably, they are the ones who DIED aka the most unfit. Nobody seems to be mentioning they were abnormal. Or we wouldn’t have found them in a mass grave, abandoned. By BOTH sides of kin. (Parents still abandon their ugly children.)

Why do they use black photos, when none of the samples were African?
And when it’s a white person, why always a fug ginger? Why no brunettes or blondes? Too afraid to make em hot?

The cave in question is in the Siberia, Russian area, so this is one of the few places whites could’ve interbred with Asians.
No wonder they died out. Nobody else wanted them. It’s been proven humans prefer averageness aka in-group looks. Only the rejects go for exotics. It isn’t surprising at all they found such a girl, she was likely infertile or abandoned for looking too bizarre, there was no psyop brainwashing to mix in those days. Investing in the wrong mate was the death of your line (still is). The males are more likely fertile (simpler system) but less desirable (both being uncanny valley but the women looking like little girls, there will always be pervs).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altai_Mountains

could’ve formed a vital part of survival
they died before breeding….
you cannot be this stupid….
it’s a black swan against hybrid vigour, which has never been proven
maybe this is why the wages of sin is death, I always wondered about that in context of cultural separation
they must’ve known of such creatures, like tales of giants in the Bible

comment
“The fact that there are different blood types is proof that we are not from the same species”
yes, it proves the modern existence of race, as God willed

“First problem is how they are defining species”
yep

Speciation is why we’re not chimps

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17268178/

also proven in maggots

Genetically differentiated races and speciation-withgene-flow in the sunflower maggot, Strauzia longipennis

who named that?

https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/speciation-the-origin-of-new-species-26230527/

Discussion of most topics within Evolutionary Biology begins with Darwin. Indeed, On The Origin of Species (1859) continues to influence much of modern Evolutionary Biology. Darwin viewed evolution by natural selection as a very gradual mechanism of change within populations, and postulated that new species could be the product of this very same process, but over even longer periods of time. This eventual process of speciation by natural selection is illustrated by a sketch drawn by Darwin in his personal notebook nearly 20 years before the Origin of Species was published (Figure 1). Here, he proposed a model whereby lineages form from their ancestors by evolving different characters over relatively long periods of time. Darwin indicated that species could form by the evolution of one species splitting into two, or via a population diverging from its extant ancestor to the point it was a new species. [DS: what mixing is attempting, in-group replacement*] Darwin’s insights into evolution were brilliant, especially in light of their being made in the absence of genetics. Indeed, ideas about heredity and the introduction of new genetic material via mutation were to come long after Darwin’s founding theories of evolution.

Barriers to reproduction.

Under the commonly used ‘Biological Species Concept’ (Mayr 1942), the formation of new species involves the evolution of reproductive barriers to the production of viable offspring either before (pre-zygotic barriers) or soon after (post-zygotic barriers) mating. [no fertilization or later weak implantation] Thus, new species form when individuals from diverging [process, of outbreeding] populations no longer recognize one another as potential mates, or opportunities for mating become limited by differences in habitat use or reproductive schedules. In some cases, these pre-zygotic isolating mechanisms fail to prevent inter-breeding among individuals from separate populations. In these cases, viable hybrids may form, or the consequences of a successful mating attempt may end in failure, either due to the production of inviable zygotes or sterile, nonreproductive offspring. These diverse pre- and post-zygotic barriers are of great importance to speciation biologists because they determine how reproductively-isolated [read: disgusted] populations are from one another, which indicates how far along the often continuous process of speciation that populations are. For example, reproductive isolation [sexual selection/rejection] is weak in the early stages of speciation, but changes to strong or complete [like the visceral subhuman disgust studies, also aversion found in babies] in later stages of speciation (Figure 2). One or more of the many types of isolating mechanisms [freedom of association] may play a role in the evolution of species along a continuum (Figure 2). But how and why might reproductive barriers to genetic exchange evolve?

barriers > not impossibility

“inviable zygotes” bipolar weeb girl, anyone?

so IVF, if we cared about the good of the species, should literally be illegal – I’m sure medical tech helping morons was a plot point in Idiocracy
Nature is telling you No
People are so selfish. Nobody is entitled to reproduce. Ultimately, God set this order into place from a position of higher wisdom. Playing God does not go well – see their medical ailments, rare genetic conditions and mental problems. That could be another reason cave girl was abandoned by both tribes – insanity, they seek out isolated places. Asylums are generally comforting to the insane. The modern world does us a disservice by covering it up, would you really want to breed with certain people if you saw them off-med? Men should be most offended by this because do you wanna find out you mated with crazy once the kids show up? It’s like how ‘women’ don’t disclose they had plastic surgery. You’ll find out eventually. Is that really consent? We need informed consent re heritage and looks as part of marriage law.

Biological success is not having kids. It’s having grandkids. This is also seen in plants.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-two-parents-C24-and-Ler-together-with-the-F1-hybrid-and-F2-plants-at-28-d-after_fig1_281141876

their own sentence debunks claims of vigour, which would be heritable by ALL descendants, not just one gen:

“F1 hybrids can outperform their parents in yield and vegetative biomass, features of hybrid vigor that form the basis of the hybrid seed industry.

The yield advantage of the F1 is lost in the F2 and subsequent generations. In Arabidopsis, from F2 plants that have a F1-like phenotype, we have by recurrent [artificial] selection produced pure breeding F5/F6 lines…”

misuse of pure, cutting out the runts by weeding out shows it is not a natural phenomena

*yes, genocidal

The hybrid found in the cave was likely the product of rape, explaining the deadbeating and maternal rejection. Rape is common between races because it over-rides sexual selection…

Stillbirth in black/white mixed couples

1.6 million examples, can’t blame the group size this time?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20235877/

Results: The analysis included approximately 1.6 million live births and 1749 stillbirths. In the unadjusted model, compared with two white parents, black/black and black/white couples had a significantly higher risk of fetal death. When all demographic, social, biological, genetic, congenital, and procedural risk factors except gestational age and birth weight were included, the odds ratios (OR) were all still significant. Black/black couples had the highest level of risk (OR 2.11, CI 1.77-2.51), followed by black mother/white father couples (OR 2.01, CI 1.16-3.48), and white mother/black father couples (OR 1.84, CI 1.33-2.54). Virtually all of the higher risk of fetal death was explainable by higher rates of low birth weight and prematurity.

Conclusions: Mixed race black and white couples face higher odds of prematurity and low birth weight, which appear to contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth. There are likely additional unmeasured factors that influence birth outcomes for mixed race couples.

but wait, there’s more!

https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-014-0404-0

Results

53,293 deliveries occurred during the time period, of which 329 resulted in a stillbirth (6.2 per 1,000 births). Compared to White women, non-White ethnicity was associated with a doubling of the odds of stillbirth (aOR for Black women 2.15, 95% CI 1.56-2.97; and for South Asian women 2.33, 95% CI 1.42-3.83).

Obese women had a trend towards higher odds of stillbirth compared to women of recommended BMI (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.96), though this was not significant (p 0.07). < aka no excuse there

Both higher parity (≥2 compared to para 1) and hypertension were associated with a higher odds of stillbirth (parity ≥2 aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.39; hypertension aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.22-2.78) but there was no evidence that area deprivation or maternal age were independently associated with stillbirth in this population. < aka no excuse there either

There was some evidence of effect modification between ethnicity and obesity (p value for interaction 0.06), with obesity a particularly strong risk factor for stillbirth in South Asian women (aOR 4.64, 95% CI 1.84-11.70).

Conclusions

There was a high prevalence of stillbirth in this multi-ethnic urban population. The increased risk of stillbirth observed in non-White women remains after adjusting for other factors.

Our finding of possible effect modification between ethnicity and obesity suggests that further research should be conducted in order to improve understanding of the interplay between ethnicity, obesity and stillbirth.”

but you just said obesity was non-sig?

And the only reason to do so has now gone.

How is it that minority infants are still unhealthy if their parents are smoking less than White parents? This is probably due to genetics and environment as well. A Dutch study compared the various rates of smoking among different ethnicities/races, “Since maternal smoking during pregnancy is quite equally distributed among the ethnic populations, it does not contribute much to the observed differences in birthweight.”(34) That study compared native Dutch people and immigrants…..”

“….As one can see, the amount of stillbirths was higher for the interracial couples. This was especially true of White father/Black mother relationships, but the White mother/Black father rates were still far worse than the rates of stillbirth for White couples. The outcomes for mulatto infants was at the detriment of the surveyed White population.(10)

What are the specifics to this horrible process? For this, we have to understand that having mixed genetic ancestry through mtDNA and yDNA perpetuates this happening. Let’s look at one of the best studies that has been published on this subject: “Divergent Patterns of Mitochondrial and Nuclear Ancestry Are Associated with the Risk for Preterm Birth.” This study investigated the unusually high rates of preterm birth among African Americans: “Haplogroup-defining polymorphisms are not merely markers of ancestry, and have consequences for mitochondrial function, including the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression.”(20)

Some might be surprised to know that many African Americans have large amounts of European ancestry. The European ancestry that African Americans have was distributed from White males when slavery was still legal.(20) To put it another way, having ancestry from vastly different ancestors contributes to these genetic predispositions. It is necessary to demonstrate this with a principal component analysis. The turquoise dots below represent the African population. As one can see, the African American population is represented by a long cline between European American (CEU) and African (YRI) samples. (24)

(Price, 24)

The majority of mitochondrial haplogroups (mtDNA) that African Americans have are African, since these come from African women originally, “… individuals with L, U6, or U5b1 haplogroup mtDNA and primarily African nuclear ancestry were defined as having low levels of divergent ancestry, whereas individuals with non-African haplogroups and high degrees of African nuclear ancestry had high levels of divergent ancestry.”(20) These researchers looked at any potential confounding variables that would skew results for the African American population. They examined a number socioeconomic variables such as years of school taken, income, etc. According to the researchers, “There was no detected statistical association between divergent ancestry and any of these factors.” (21)”

“But White people aren’t marrying out as much as other ethnic groups. Therefore, in the rare instance that a White person has a non-White partner, it is unlikely that these interracial couples are being treated in a less-preferable way by their families:

“…Whites are somewhat less willing to marry and bear children interracially than to date interracially. These attitudes and behaviors are related to warmth toward racial outgroups, political conservatism, age, gender, education, and regionThird, White women are likely to approve of interracial relationships for others but not themselves, while White men express more willingness to engage in such relationships personally, particularly with Asians.

However, neither White men nor White women are very likely to actually engage in interracial relationships. Thus, positive global attitudes toward interracial relationships do not translate into high rates of actual interracial cohabitation or marriage despite the fact that most White Americans (especially White females) aren’t interested in being in a relationship with a non-White person. (5)

In fact, different races/ethnicities do not experience the same amount of stress while they are in an interracial relationship. And this spans across different age groups, “The negative effects of interracial dating hold similarly for boys and girls and among White and Black youth. Interracial dating less negatively effects the depressive symptomatology of Hispanics, though, and actually appears to ‘protect’ Asian youth from depressive symptoms.”(9) Additionally, White women seem to get extremely stressed from being in a relationship between either Hispanic or Black males. Blacks in those relationships aren’t affected by stress in those relationships:”

“…Furthermore, non-Hispanic whites with non-Hispanic black spouses also fare worse than their interracially married peers with Hispanic spouses. In contrast, the self-reported health of married non-Hispanic blacks shows no significant difference between the interracially and the endogamously married.”(10)”

“Where this stress is coming from is another important aspect to consider: Even if there was a trend of neglect for interracial families/pregnancies, it would only be because of the natural inclination to find these relationships unacceptable, “Bias against interracial romance is correlated with self-reported feelings of disgust”. (12)This phenomenon can be observed via brain scans. There is an intense neural mechanism that is triggered when a person observes interracial couples,“Interracial couples elicit a neural disgust response among observers — as indicated by increased insula activation.”(12)In this case, this psychological disgust could be considered an extension of ethnic nepotism or association; if people are disgusted by these relationships it would imply that being involved with an individual of an out-group is not beneficial to the in-group. Because the effects of race mixing create unhealtheir children, this natural disgust is moral.  And as I have shown above, the most distinctive evidence proves this.”

At a neurological level, they’re viewed as animals, as sub-human, and even babies perceive race and avoid the out-group.

https://www.washington.edu/news/2016/08/17/study-finds-bias-disgust-toward-mixed-race-couples/

“That indicates that viewing images of interracial couples evokes disgust at a neural level,” Skinner said.

Participants were quicker to associate interracial couples with non-human animals and same-race couples with humans. That suggests that interracial couples are more likely to be dehumanized than same-race couples, the researchers write, and previous studies have shown that people tend to exhibit more antisocial behavior and are more likely to use aggression and even violence toward dehumanized targets.”

Nobody is jealous. Are we also jealous of the dirty toilets used in the study? Anyone can trade down. It isn’t hard. Black women trading down to omega white men is still a trade down. Race-mixers are always omegas.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10770563/Babies-show-racial-bias-study-finds.html

It’s biology, white people have nothing to do with your herpetic uterus.

https://www.theroot.com/nearly-half-of-black-women-have-herpes-1790878841

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4911234/How-herpes-cause-stillbirth-explain-Usher-s-saga.html

Yes, it’s relevant.

https://hyphenmagazine.com/blog/2010/05/study-finds-disturbing-std-rates-among-asian-americans

But we found that Asian American young women are at risk of high STDs.  For instance, Asian American women had a higher prevalence of STDs than White women in both 1995 (10.4% vs. 7.7) and 2001 (13.5% vs. 8.3%).  The incidence of STDs (not diagnosed with STDs in 1995, but developed STIs in 2001) among Asian American women was also higher than that of White women.” 

Magic Dirt? Doesn’t work.

Explaining Adultery, parts of the Bible, disease etc.

No one has typed out an explanation of this, to my knowledge. Sure there are linguistic essays but… still.

Here’s the logical explanation of certain things. Ending with collaborating science.

Adultery is a sin because it’s a pollution of bloodlines, that’s why it’s called that but the sexual action or compulsion is already covered under the coveting commandment. Fornication between two singles, while a sin, is not polluting the bloodlines of the marital couple. It doesn’t defile the marital bed, as the Bible puts it (Hebrews 13:4). It’s “and” adulterers, they’re discrete categories. The adultery involving one married party may produce a child with defects (especially with the effect of STDs from sleeping around, which they’d bring back to the marital bed, onto their own children – and might kill them), or the child maritally or the one “extra-maritally” may eventually marry their own part-sibling and then produce defect. All the sexual prohibitions are henceforth founded in an avoidance of bloodline corruption.

They’re not being ‘lame’ and killing your ‘buzz’ man, it’s babymaking. Don’t make broken babies!

The sterile view of reproduction is like a Marxist’s view of labour – delusional.

re Deut 23:2 and the mistranslation in later editions:
Legitimacy is based on bloodlines more than marital status but under the parent-approved marriage model the former suitability led to the latter ceremony. They’d have veto power on funding the wedding and allowance of inheriting anything should the child try to brattishly insist on an adulterous match. Banishment (disowning) is the parental right should the child “dishonour” (commandment) their parent’s standards. A bastard didn’t refer to unmarried parents back then but moreso what we’d call politely a hybrid, Darwin a mongrel. Later editions mistranslated the concept of ‘bastard’ for ((reasons)). Logically, unmarried parents could feasibly marry at any point in the next 18 years and 9 months, the insult cannot be based on something so easily remedied. Instead it’s “in the blood”, it’s about the “seed”, it’s genetic. It’s the existence of the kid itself which is the affront, the offense to the holy, and that’s why ‘bastard’ is levied at the child – not the parents! They brought shame on their pre-existing family (bloodline) by virtue of their dishonourable existence, of a blemish. The OT often condemns men who mate with ‘foreign women’, the archetype of demonic seductress. That’s why usually understanding God (who forgives individuals) forbade the child to enter the church, holy ground, sacred temples, unto the 10th generation, because it was a perversion of his creation and divine, famous plan for separation of peoples; its existence was Satanic, a testament to playing God. Its existence was an insult to God, directly, it was an ABOMINATION.
Now we have the medical stats to back this up from the individualist perspective, from mental problems to organ death from child cancer, nobody mentions it…?
Why? Why not? Who’s behind that cultural ignorance?
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Race-Mixing/
The sins of the father onto the child i.e. you produce an unnatural thing, it suffers unnaturally.

Period blood isn’t the only unclean thing: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Semen

So bad marital discernment (selection) relates to the reprobate mind. Selection is the ONE job of men looking for a wife. The Bible gives plenty of advice on men seeking a wife, what to look for.

Cast not ye pearls among swine, neither spill your seed, it’s very simple conceptually. Don’t waste a breeding opportunity with a bad match or selfishness. You want societal shame back? Start with masculine self-control (Lev 22:4) because you’ll be healthier for it. This isn’t just spiritually good but physically too. Like don’t stick your dick in crazy. At least a woman’s period isn’t alive for all the stigma, there’s nothing to kill. God designed women to self-clean the baby oven, there’s no shame in it. Poor analogy to the modern Onans. You have a specific story about sexual continence, sexual hygiene, call it whatever, it’s being a man.
https://www.openbible.info/topics/spilling_your_seed
https://biblereasons.com/evil-women-and-bad-wives/

If you marry badly, that doesn’t absolve you of responsibility for her sins. You’re the man, you’re responsible, be she some Polish whore (they’re mostly marrying Arabs and Japs) or an ABG/LBFM thot (mostly autists).

Prov 22:14  The mouth of an adulterous woman is a deep pit; a man who is under the LORD’s wrath falls into it.

I’m picturing the conceited weebs who start lecturing the rest of us (projection in ego defense of their error) on how white people in the West should become more Asian. You eat the bugs first, bug boy. Such cucking is, as you can see, Biblically predicted as God’s wrath upon the reprobate mind. Insecurity breeds insecurity, misery loves company, fuck-ups want you to copy them.

If everyone fails, the sexual Marxists reason, then nobody fails!

They want no holy (wholesome, pure) group to be able to compare poorly to.

deceit, malice, envy….

https://biblehub.com/romans/1-28.htm

why be envious of people you claim to be doing better than? Why talk about the West at all after you left? Why are you obsessing over it, if it’s inferior culturally? Racial deserters should STFU and stay in their jungle. We don’t want to hear from you, stay gone. There’s a rise in snarky gammas online giving weeb “commentary” that sounds like CCP propaganda. It’s anti-white, sod off. Why should we care what you think? You ran away from the problems, drop them. It’s like a Boomer who retired to France complaining about UK immigration. No Susan. You don’t get to.

Stats show up their forum anecdotes as fantasies. They wanted mixed bloodlines, right, they’ll be happy with the black grandkids I presume (since mixed dates other mixed, statistically).

In Deut 7:3 even the unequal yoking between the races is forbidden, before the prospect of children is mentioned.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%207&version=KJV
Cultures are intended to be sovereign. Interconnection is weakness.
7:4 says how mixed marriages are insults because of cultural cucking i.e. your child will adopt foreign ways.
Learn to tell your kids no, Boomer. JUST SAY NO.

Otherwise, unchecked, they “invent new forms of evil” like the conceited weebs that are becoming the new Fedora Boy.

insolent, arrogant, boastful….

It’s like the Gap Year story that never ends.

NEVER.

And we’re all expected to listen to it.

One word: why?

Do evil, fine, don’t be boastful though. I shouldn’t be socially expected to listen to some woman’s sob story about how she married a Muslim either. Tough tits, bitch. You knew they was a snake. You signed up for shit. It’s like the thots joining Islamic State, I no longer feel loyal to you either. I owe you nothing.

Stop coddling them. They’re grown men rationalizing objectively, scientifically shit marriages.

And encouraging the same multicultural evil to other men, that’s gender treason. You shouldn’t enable it.

There were 10 basic rules. Multicultural tradlarpers moved, so please stop talking to us like you’re a Westerner. You’re an outsider now, ree.

https://biblehub.com/romans/1-32.htm

Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death,they not only continue to do these things,but also approve of those who practice them.

Worthy of death, how would God manifest that in case of adulterous children?

Suicidal temperament, perhaps?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

Cancer risks?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25792752/

Our results confirm that there are ethnic and racial differences in the incidence of childhood leukaemia. These differences indicate that some genetic and/or environmental/cultural factors are involved in aetiology of childhood leukaemia.

American diet means you should compare to European whites for accuracy. Twinkies are thots, not food groups.

The highest risk of ALL was observed for children with a combination of Hispanic ethnicity and White race compared with non-Hispanic whites (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.44).

They actually leave out mixed of most studies e.g. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14559954/

unless they can rig the numbers from the small group because it’s so bad in outcome. It’s impossible to find prevalence data, why?

It’s true in other species scientifically, outbreeding depression is unholy, it defiles the wholesome in God’s eye. That invites wrath.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10762398/

https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/96/2/114/2187513

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12144669/

Mixing stunts growth, even in plants. Sure, you might have kids but great-grandkids won’t happen.

So what was the point?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15487997/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14983018/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15807418/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9375532/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4066391/

Deny the lies of the spiteful mutants, anti-natalists aren’t so toxic to the zero sum of Darwinian competition. To actively encourage our genocide is evil.

Funny that the cuckservatives slagging off the Boomers want a free pass to act just like them despite decades of data now. That didn’t exist for them. You’re living in the experiment.
And yes, the Boomers should’ve been disowned by their parents for marrying wrong or too often.

They’ll deport, sorry “return” tortoises for their own good – but not humans.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19426071.300-galapagos-tortoises-untangling-the-evolutionary-threads.html

The spiteful mutants of the Boomer gen became worse in the spiteful mutants of Gen Y and Z – but nobody is condemning them.

Science and Bible agree, how much do you need?

I heard a theory the trash segment of Boomers should’ve been picked off by war like Vietnam and the draft dodging is the main cause of our dysgenics. Possible and funny.

So how to know the weeb boys abroad are lying?

Weeb offspring and mental problems:

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc–baa081108.php

A new study of Chinese-Caucasian, Filipino-Caucasian, Japanese-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals concludes that biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.

A+ parenting.

Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.

1/3. Over a THIRD of them are literally mentally diseased at the intensity to diagnose.

The study included information from 125 biracial Asian Americans from across the U.S., including 55 Filipino-Caucasians, 33 Chinese-Caucasians, 23 Japanese-Caucasians and 14 Vietnamese-Caucasians.

Stop listening to spiteful mutants.

Nobody’s jealous, they’re clinically evil. Shun the reprobate mind.

High diversity, low trust society: https://web.archive.org/web/20061013041712/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340.html

deport the whores

nb. The edgy anti-natal rhetoric worked on the Boomers first, ask the dead half of Gen X. However, there’s more than one way to skin a cat and clearly more than one way to commit genetic suicide.

The womb is a very sophisticated form of printer. It prints people. That’s why women hate being conflated for one, it’s an appliance. Don’t defile the womb of your people, that’s treason. Do not corrupt the seed.

Plato’s natural slaves, do not follow. Degenerates are compulsive liars e.g.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203037/

https://sti.bmj.com/content/87/Suppl_2/ii14

Syphilis infection in sex workers ranges from 8.8–9.5% in the Yunnan province to 8% in Guangdong to 3.5% in Beijing (Chen XS, personal communication, 2010).

https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/24/4/431/503360

High levels of infection in these groups are found in most sub-Saharan African and South-East Asian countries. There is a high rate of concurrent infection for HIV and other well known STDs in patients. Rates as high as 70% of HIV infection are found in African patients with STD, whereas the rates are reaching 15–20% in patients with STD in Thailand [9,10].

Ting Tong has HIV. 1 in 5, roll the die to die. Is it really cheaper to live there with pozz med bills?

If you wanna larp as a gay guy, at least do fun things with your prostate.

If you get her a green card?

https://hyphenmagazine.com/blog/2010/05/study-finds-disturbing-std-rates-among-asian-americans

Over the course the study, Hahm unmasked some myths common about Asian Americans. She said, “There’s a perception that Asian Americans in particular aren’t practicing sexually risky behaviors.  But we found that Asian American young women are at risk of high STDs.  For instance, Asian American women had a higher prevalence of STDs than White women in both 1995 (10.4% vs. 7.7) and 2001 (13.5% vs. 8.3%).  The incidence of STDs (not diagnosed with STDs in 1995, but developed STIs in 2001) among Asian American women was also higher than that of White women.” Moreover, the power dynamic between genders became immediately clear.   Asian American women were four times more likely to have a STD than their male counterparts. “This was shocking,” said Hahm, “It was so much higher than the males.” Accounting for the gender disparity, Hahm suggested that…“Asian and Pacific Islander women also have broader interracial dating patterns than Asian American men. This might explain why these women are exposed to higher rates of STDs.”

when you mix, expect an itch

I think these findings definitely go against some prior conceptions about Asian Americans and sexually transmitted diseases. The 4:1 ratio of STDs among Asian American women to men is astounding. To see what this means, I looked up some global data of STD rates around the world, broken down by gender. In East Asia, and on every other continent, women have slightly higher STD rates than men, however nothing comes remotely close to the 4:1 ratio among Asian Americans.

It’s unclear what the study means by “power dynamic,” whether it means sexual power/demand, or power within the culture. One can speculate on a wide variety of reasons for why the STD rates are the way they are. I’ll refrain from doing so, but nevertheless I thought it was noteworthy to bring up, as a point of discussion. How does this strike you?

it means they culturally celebrate and enable whores – like the childbearing geisha

Trust no thot nor weeb.

Link: Outbreeding Depression

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/genetic_structure_and_outbreeding_depression

This phenomenon can occur in two ways. One way is by the “swamping” of locally adapted genes in a wild population by straying from, for example, a hatchery population. In this case, adaptive gene complexes in wild populations are simply being displaced by the immigration of genes that are adapted to the hatchery environment or to some other locality. For example, selection in one population might produce a large body size, whereas in another population small body size might be more advantageous. Gene flow between these populations may lead to individuals with intermediate body sizes, which may not be adaptive in either population. A second way outbreeding depression can occur is by the breakdown of biochemical or physiological compatibilities between genes in the different populations. Within local, isolated populations, alleles are selected for their positive, overall effects on the local genetic background.

Due to nonadditive gene action, the same genes may have rather different average effects in different genetic backgrounds—hence, the potential evolution of locally coadapted gene complexes. Offspring between parents from two different populations may have phenotypes that are not good for any environment. It is important to keep in mind that these two mechanisms of outbreeding depression can be operating at the same time. However, determining which mechanism is more important in a particular population is very difficult.

beige people, blandifying selection traits

In other words, genetic structure, aka, genetic correlation structure is more than additional ethnic genetic interest—it can be function, hence loss of that structure results in loss of function resulting in outbreeding depression.

….

Evidence for outbreeding depression is much less extensive than evidence for inbreeding depression, but outbreeding depression is nevertheless a general genetic phenomenon. One problem in studying outbreeding depression is the number of generations that may occur before outbreeding depression reveals itself. The effects of outbreeding enhancement due to the masking of deleterious alleles and outbreeding depression due to hybrid breakdown may cancel each other in the first generation after crossing individuals from two populations. So the effects of outbreeding depression may not be apparent for a few generations.

They just know that inbreeding is more of a problem than outbreeding—and that’s why they’re “justified” in imposing outbreeding on populations with government force and technologically amplified panmixia.

Quotes and sarcasm, deserved.

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/kinship_and_fertility

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5864/813

This paper demonstrates that, in an analysis of Icelandic couples born between 1800 and 1965, there is a “significant positive association” between kinship and fertility; maximal reproductive success was observed for couples with kinship relatedness at the level of third or fourth cousins.

The authors conclude that these differences in reproductive success (i.e. fitness*) have a “biological basis” – that is, a genetic basis.

Strikingly, however, our results show that couples related at the degree of third to fourth cousins exhibited the greatest reproductive success.

In order to maximize fitness, therefore, one doesn’t have to move that far from the endogamous extreme.  Just a few rungs upward on the kinship distance ladder produces benefits superior to that of both extremes.  It’s totally irresponsible and mendacious to use the fitness costs of obvious incest to argue for reckless hybridization (**) with the most genetically distant organisms with which individuals are cross-fertile.

“It could be argued that in human populations there is a point of balance between the disadvantages associated with inbreeding versus those with outbreeding,” said Alan Bittles, director of the Center for Human Genetics at Edith Cowan University in Western Australia.

Therefore, not only is it unlikely – as has been asserted on this blog previously – that any putative “hybrid vigor” can compensate for lost parental kinship, but it’s also highly unlikely that “hybrid vigor” exists to any significant extent for most human populations past the “second cousin” level.  Defining fitness in the proper biological sense, the recent deCODE findings suggest that increased hybridity past an optimal point may in fact reduce reproductive fitness above and beyond the real losses in genetic interests due to foregone parental kinship.

From the Udry study discussed by J. Richards in a previous blog post, to the lack of any evidence of enhanced reproductive success of mixed couples and their offspring, to these latest deCODE findings that reproductive success may be maximized by closer kinship, it would seem that when in doubt, one should err on the side of increased endogamy (to the level of “third cousins” only, of course).

Duh.

When even deCODE – which decided to sift through James Watson’s ancestry and make public their dubious findings because of a politically correct distaste at what they perceived as Watson’s (presumably “racist”) comments on African intelligence levels – publishes findings that show a biologically based enhanced fitness for mating at high levels of kinship relatedness, then one must wonder how any scientifically objective individual could possibly still peddle the idea that cross-racial mating is somehow a biologically preferable choice.

Fetishes.

An important point: it’s really not so important that high kinship actually enhances reproductive fitness, or the mechanisms whereby that occurs.  More important is the lack of evidence for the contrary view: that increasing levels of exogamy leads to “hybrid vigor” and enhanced fitness.  The findings from this study constitute yet more evidence that “hybrid vigor” is not an important force – if it is one at all – for humans.

It doesn’t exist in humans, we’re not racehorses.

Prized, rare (or unique) traits like genius, maybe, but that’s kin-related, subrace max.

In the absence of such “hybrid vigor,” parental kinship takes “center stage.”  The possibility that endogamy may actually raise fitness per se, as suggested by deCODE, is just “icing on the cake,” hammering home the point that mating “between the lines” of genetically distant groups is not required for enhanced fitness.

*Reproductive success and the maintenance/expansion of distinctive genetic information are the reasonable measures of biological fitness, not whether “Tiger Woods smells better on the golf course,” or any other inane commentaries that spew forth from the addled “minds” of certain hysterical proponents of objectively maladaptive inter-racial couplings.
An example of maladaptive inter-racial hybridization is found here.  Again, that’s not even considering reproductive fitness or parental kinship, but merely negative health consequences of introducing one race’s genes into another race’s genome.

**Responsible researchers and conservationists are beginning to understand the consequences of reckless hybridization and outbreeding depression.  Some quotes, and my comments:

the available data suggest that risks of outbreeding, particularly in the second generation, are on par with the risks of inbreeding.

If there’s no advantage for hybridization in the long run, then what’s the point?  Note that this paper is talking about decisions to “intentionally hybridize” animals – we are not concerned with parental kinship when considering animals, only the relative “quality” of the resultant phenotypes.  Even with that, hybridization is questionable.  However, we are humans, and as such, have concerns above and beyond these considerations – such as kinship issues.  So, everything said about hybridization in animals holds true for humans, but, for humans, the underlying cost of hybridization – foregone parental kinship – is something additional that concerns us in dealing with mating choices.

Meanwhile, managers can minimize the risks of both inbreeding and outbreeding by using intentional hybridization only for populations clearly suffering from inbreeding depression…

Yes.  This is the conservative approach.  While Ashkenazi Jews can be said to “clearly suffer” from “inbreeding depression” the same cannot be said of European ethnic groups, or Europeans as a whole (or, for that matter, Africans, Asians, etc.).

The low IQs of Eastern Europeans are inbreeding depression.

Again – and this cannot be stressed enough – that’s not even considering parental kinship (or genetic interests in general).  The Ashkenazim may have preservationist considerations that may lead them to reject hybridization independent of whatever “benefits” genetic mixing may bring, and the cost/benefit ratio may very well favor that rejection.  However, given that Europeans are not “clearly suffering” from “inbreeding depression” there is no reason to follow Ziv’s advice and destroy our genetic interests for non-existent “benefits” to “solve” a non-existent “problem.”

Destroy yourself now because you might, at some point, destroy yourself!

….nah

….maximizing the genetic and adaptive similarity between populations…

In other words, if, for some reason, hybridization is decided upon, one should pick for the hybridization a population as genetically similar to the original population as possible.  One does not pick the most genetically distant populations possible!

…and testing the effects of hybridization for at least two generations whenever possible.

to ensure fertility, not the liger issue

Yes – instead of promoting widespread human panmixia based upon how Tiger Woods might smell on the golf course.  Of course, one may look at highly admixed populations throughout the world and use those for “testing the effects.”  Even leaving kinship concerns out of the picture, the results with respect to positive traits have not been encouraging.

While the data on outbreeding depression are dwarfed by those on inbreeding depression, the few studies that exist suggest that concerns over outbreeding should be taken seriously, as the effects can in some cases be as damaging as severe inbreeding.

Yes, taken seriously, instead of making juvenile comments about which male celebrity may be better able to “induce orgasm” in which female celebrity.  Again, given the costs for humans of foregone kinship, where are the “benefits?”

As a start, managers should strive to do no harm.

What should we think of those who, seemingly, wish to maximize harm?

That is, we should intentionally hybridize populations only when there is hard evidence that a population is suffering from inbreeding depression.

Speculation about how Tiger Woods might smell after a round of golf does not constitute said “hard evidence.”  There is no “hard evidence” that European populations (or Africans, Asians, etc.) are “suffering” from inbreeding depression.  Other small populations may be “suffering;” in that case, let those groups decide to balance the costs and benefits of hybridization – and a “pro” choice hardly means choosing the most distant groups possible as mates.

…low levels of gene flow are predicted to have disastrous effects on populations vulnerable to outbreeding (Edmands & Timmerman 2003).

Yes.

As a final postscript, readers may be interested in an alternative viewpoint with respect to the function of sexual reproduction – which stresses species and chromosomal stability over “increased genetic diversity.”

By diversity they mean the healthy range.

Unhealthy is culled by natural selection.

Also:

“Well, South Asians are the product of mixing between several Caucasoid and Asiatic people, and problems with their racial classification notwithstanding, the fact remains that European Caucasoids and East Asians clearly belong to different races.  In a classic example offered by Arthur Jensen, different bands of a rainbow blend into each other, yet this does not mean that a rainbow doesn’t contain different color bands that are easily distinguished from each other, except at the boundaries. ” marriage post (so not really gene heavy)

Genetic distance studies. Forensic skull analysis. Actually, you can clearly see group and case boundaries.

Averages matter

No moving the goalposts.

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/eurasians_more_attractive_than_ugly_caucasians_not_average_caucasians_a_rep/

“blending pictures of Caucasians and Asians to form a hypothetical Eurasian composite”

not how miscegenation works

The authors wrote:

The disadvantage of computer-generated mixed-race composites is that they may not precisely capture the appearance of mixed-race individuals.

Damn right!  However, the major problem is not one of precision but of accuracy.  Caucasoid/Mongoloid hybrids generally look more Mongoloid than Caucasoid because: 1) Mongoloids have retained more ancestral traits such as robust cheekbonesrobust mandibles, and various primitive (ancestral) indices of facial flatness [American Journal of Physical Anthropology 111:105-134; year 2000]; 2) some trait variation is due to dominant and epistatic genes; and 3) the genes associated with primitive features likely comprise of an excess of dominant genes with respect to the newer mutations behind the more-recently-originating facial features disproportionately found among Caucasoids.

One quibble: Broad cheekbones are robust but not attractive.

They’re flat. Very very flat.

“However, in contrast to the first two experiments, the hypothetical Eurasian composite was not rated as more attractive than the Caucasian composite, a result that has been previously reported in a different study.”

When you didn’t skew your method enough to be PC.

“Therefore, the individuals that went into the average female Caucasian likely disproportionately included ugly, obese white women (possibly of mostly Irish ancestry).  In this case, the blending appears to have improved the attractiveness rating from ugly to unattractive.”

Yeah, that’s a fair test.

Figures 5 and 6 below show the pictures used in the third experiment.  One reason behind the attractiveness of the actual Eurasian composites (EurasianAV) in Figures 5 and 6 is the narrower face due to less prominent cheekbones, narrower than even the Caucasian!  The Eurasian facial breadth should be in between the European (narrow) and the Asian (broad).

They do that on purpose to rig the finding.

Supposed Cauc75 looks Celtic, ancient Briton type.

Fuck-all to do with even Eastern Europe!

Their upper fake average is noticably more white than the actual lower pic average.

Again, fellow Brits have more good looking people by volume than other European countries.

So-called Cauc75 looks like my relatives, so I know it’s full of shit to call that a mix.

Genetic isolation from the invasions of European landmass preserved our features.

That’s why so many models are from our isles over Denmark/France/Germany/Poland etc, same reason applies to Asians with Japanese models, more sought after (by genes) and have a higher volume of Lookers than Asia mainland.

They also rig what data they release, omitting profile data.

Notice that Gillian Rhodes has not addressed the attractiveness of facial profile (side view).  I’d be damned if Caucasians consider facial flattening resulting from Mongoloid admixture as more attractive than the attractive Caucasoid norm.  Additionally, how can the following traits resulting from Mongoloid admixture among Caucasians be considered more attractive than the norm among Caucasians: reduced height, less muscularity in males, slanted eyes, flatter buttocks, smaller breasts in females, relatively shorter limbs, relatively longer trunk, and a smaller penis?

How dare you know statistics.

How DARE you.

Flatter faces in whites are considered by neonate doctors a sign of genetic disease. If they spot it in a newborn white, they do other tests for specific things, most of which are linked to retardation of the mind too.

Nasal bridge low, flat midface, short nose – Eurasian traits.

Williams Syndrome nose:

Our gut reaction as white people against mongrelization (in this case, Eurasian mixing) is an aversion to severe genetic disorder.

It could be a coincidence or not, who knows? What does it matter, since an aversion is there?

And has every right to be.

As for the eyes….

Look up downies, harsh but true.

Similar eye shape, tilt angle and placement on face to the Asians without monolids too.

So… there’s that.

Whites don’t find flat faces or stretched, narrowed eyes attractive.

even in fellow whites like Cumberbatch (for the eyes).

Technically, it isn’t about race but avoiding deformed offspring (or deformed looking, who’ll meet the same sexual selection ‘success’).

Caucasoid v Mongoloid skull

Health of mixed race discussed here:

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_health_consequences_of_race_mixing

The authors controlled for age, sex, verbal IQ, grade point average, family structure (living with one or both parents), and family education

On the other hand, there exist several examples in the animal literature where matings between more genetically distant individuals within the same species/different races result in offspring that are less healthy than the parents, on average, [30-37]  and this cannot be blamed upon struggle with identity formation.  There also exist examples of hybrid vigor, but nothing remotely close to hybrid vigor is seen in Udry’s data. 

Udry’s data are compatible with the likelihood of race mixing improving one or more parental traits in some mixed-race offspring, who may be better off than both parents on multiple counts, provided that a greater number of mixed-race offspring are overall worse off than both parents.  The former possibility is surely not implausible given that the tremendous racial and species diversity out there implies that nature does not rule out equally-well functioning/better functioning novel genetic correlation structures, which could be brought about by race mixing, though the chances of improvement would typically be slim if more distant races are involved.

it’s selfish

the parents improve their own DNA at the expense of the child

It is seen in Table 2 that those identifying as mixed race have worse health than even populations known to be highly admixed (American black, Native American, Hispanic).  This could be accounted for if one assumes that first-generation hybrids who have the worst health/behavior problems would disproportionately not be very successful in reproducing, i.e., the healthier mixed offspring could, within a few generations, set up a mixed-race population that is healthier, on average, compared to the first-generation hybrids, but for this mixed-race population to approach or exceed the overall health of the original single-race populations, it would take many generations of [naturally] weeding out the unhealthy and settling toward a novel population-typical genetic correlation structure that corresponds to good health (more on this and on hybrid vigor in a subsequent post). 

Nature’s laughing at all of us, really. That time never exists.

This also assumes the mixed race want kids – no or fewer than average, from what I read and talking to them.

Zero or below replacement level, and lower numbers for kids they actually have.

To conclude, it is irresponsible for any scientific organization to pretend that race mixing has no adverse health effects and it is obviously inappropriate to portray race mixing as desirable or virtuous.

30. Aspi J: Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity 2000, 84 (Pt 3):273-282.
31. Edmands S, Feaman HV, Harrison JS, Timmerman CC: Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations. J Hered 2005, 96:114-123.
32. Garnier-Gere PH, Naciri-Graven Y, Bougrier S, Magoulas A, Heral M, Kotoulas G, Hawkins A, Gerard A: Influences of triploidy, parentage and genetic diversity on growth of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas reared in contrasting natural environments. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:1499-1514.
33. Miller LM, Close T, Kapuscinski AR: Lower fitness of hatchery and hybrid rainbow trout compared to naturalized populations in Lake Superior tributaries. Mol Ecol 2004, 13:3379-3388.
34. Neff BD: Stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild fish population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:2381-2385.
35. Peer K, Taborsky M: Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid Ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 2005, 59:317-323.
36. Thornhill R, Moller AP: Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 1997, 72:497-548.
37. Livshits G, Kobyliansky E: Lerner’s concept of developmental homeostasis and the problem of heterozygosity level in natural populations. Heredity 1985, 55 (Pt 3):341-353.

comment

Charles Darwin on race mixing; more here (don’t take this very seriously):

These latter facts remind us of the statements, so frequently made by travellers in all parts of the world, on the degraded state and savage disposition of crossed races of man. That many excellent and kind-hearted mulattos have existed no one will dispute; and a more mild and gentle set of men could hardly be found than the inhabitants of the island of Chilce, who consist of Indians commingled with Spaniards in various proportions. On the other hand, many years ago, long before I had thought of the present subject, I was struck with the fact that, in South America, men of complicated descent between Negroes, Indians, and Spaniards, seldom had, whatever the cause might be, a good expression.(1) Livingstone,- and a more unimpeachable authority cannot be quoted,- after speaking of a half-caste man on the Zambesi, described by the Portuguese as a rare monster of inhumanity, remarks, “It is unaccountable why half-castes, such as he, are so much more cruel than the Portuguese, but such is undoubtedly the case.” An inhabitant remarked to Livingstone, “God made white men, and God made black men, but the Devil made half-castes.”(2) When two races, both low in the scale, are crossed the progeny seems to be eminently bad.

Sixth commandment…..

thou shalt not adulterate

Thus the noble-hearted Humboldt, who felt no prejudice against the inferior races, speaks in strong terms of the bad and savage disposition of Zambos, or half-castes between Indians and Negroes; and this conclusion has been arrived at by various observers.(3) From these facts we may perhaps infer that the degraded state of so many half-castes is in part due to reversion to a primitive and savage condition, induced by the act of crossing, even if mainly due to the unfavourable moral conditions under which they are generally reared. 

nurture has been debunked (adoption studies)

[1] Journal of Researches, 1845, p. 71.
[2] Expedition to the Zambesi, 1865, pp. 25, 150.
[3] Dr. P. Broca, on ‘Hybridity in the Genus Homo,’ Eng. translat., 1864, p. 39.

A study on cruelty would be interesting.

Context in the Bible

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Why mention sexually immoral and adultery also? By modern, i.e. false, meanings those would be the same point? The same act i.e. sexing someone you aren’t married to, a particular type of intercourse.

I’ve been re-reading the sections with the word ‘adultery’, with the historically accurate context of adultery and it was there the whole time.

The Bible did say to test things so I looked and I’m shocked it’s clearly there in the phrasing. The only possible interpretation given the multiple instances of context like this is the Thou shalt not mongrelize linguistic origin of the Sixth Commandment.

This doesn’t bode well for the weebs and other outbreeding fetishists. “Their end will correspond to their deeds.”

The narrow modern definition is interpreted falsely (with intellectual dishonesty) and this lends new credence to the concept of the Way being narrow i.e. having the full context.

Romans 16:18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

That would be a great way for a Satanist to destroy us, sell us a publicized misinterpretation of a Commandment so many break it. It also justifies their own lusts (belly, loins) as not sinful for the same acts. They flatter greedy fools (the simple) and what are men most easily deceived by? The phallus.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is the myth. Nobody who buys into it can be right-wing i.e. reality-based.

We even have genetics studies, we can physically SEE the differences!

Proverbs: Take the garment of one who puts up security for a stranger; hold it in pledge if it is done for an outsider.

e.g.

Consider the context of:

James 4:4 You adulterers! Don’t you realize that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God? I say it again: If you want to be a friend of the world, you make yourself an enemy of God.

with the modern limited sense, the use of the concept adultery there is erroneous.

They must mean the deeper, broader rooted sense of the sin.

FYI, scroll to the Sixth Commandment

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm

Back up here: https://web.archive.org/web/20190728135458/http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

Penny dropped, has it?

Casual Sex Creates Guilt


Wow, it really is the current year.

What’s next, AOC admits Communism/socialism has been tried and always failed?

He’d have done better going with Islam, his ancestral religion.
I wonder how long this will last.

Drug-based religious epiphanies are fake. They’re always deceitful, demonic in nature.

That’s why ‘shamans’, savages and all sorts of occulty bullshit rely on it, including self-aware Satanists.

It’s an illusion and half the attendees of Burning Man experience the same drug-based ‘revelations’.

If God’s word didn’t move you for decades, it wasn’t that. He’s talking about the world, too worldly for it to have been real. He’s also preaching with zero grounds. No humility.

Still, it does seem like he always knew it was wrong to slut around and did it anyway, suggesting a false conversion to control the religious with false piety and twisting lies akin to the CHINO kind. Cynically, it could be a gamble to make money off a fresh demo. In which case, Muslims have more money.

You can’t ‘game’ God into a place in Heaven, nobody will listen to a sinner from the church and this won’t allow him control over white women. It’s laughable if he thinks he can dominate women as a man, women who believe men ain’t shit compared to God.

He seems to be repeating, almost word for word, what many people among us have been saying for years (while he slagged us off for it):

“Sleeping around is the most common example. Outside the confines of love and family, sex is perverse and immoral, because it denies the reproductive aspect of humanity to treat others as masturbatory tools that are used and discarded.”

That’s called objectification and it’s dehumanizing. Congratulations, you agree with the feminists on something (although objectification does exist, it’s connected to the Sexual Revolution, Patriarchy usually protects its women).

“It turns out that men who have received sexual pleasure from sluts will then attack sluts for being… sluts.”

He discovered the wikipedia page on projection. But men who sleep with female sluts are ALSO sluts, that’s what a slut is.


It’s also Madonna/Whore, men who are repulsed by ‘good girls’ as sexual options or cheat on the wife instead of loyalty, with a slutty mistress.

It is a mistake to assume everyone is guilt filled and projecting though.
If they’re not loudly going after people and quietly going about it, they’re probably just naturally promiscuous. Rare, but occurs.

“scarcity of eggs-”
myth, women actually produce new eggs during post-birth life, it’s been studied and that myth debunked
the male gamete constantly refreshes, compounding mutation rates

“shortened window of fertility” paternal age is a huge factor in miscarriage, stillbirth and sub-fertility in men as well, especially after 30 quality starts to drop and after 40 especially (see paternal age tag)
the high autist rate is something researchers have openly blamed on the ‘trend’ for older fathers, trying to deter them from waiting, which the MSM hasn’t amplified as important because it hates you

“You see this in black, Asian, and Indian women who attack “white privilege” and “white supremacy” while simultaneously dating white men or being attracted to them.”

going after white fever, brave

Push that button if you want ANY influence. Sex issues are so 2010, now it’s all about race.

“Other behaviors that create guilt are masturbation, especially with the aid of hardcore pornography, and sodomy, which are both direct forms of self-abuse.”

Both sexes masturbate in their sleep naturally, zero guilt I’ve ever seen reported in studies. If God designed us, that one gets a free pass. Unless it’s the baby Jesus buttplug. Porn causes guilt because it’s voyeurism.

‘Straight’ men engaging in anal are at new risk of previously only homo-common diseases.

and less navel-gazing, America

FIX the problems rather than a circlejerk TALKING.

Priceless inclusion given:

“If I didn’t stop having casual sex, I would find new and ingenious ways to insult women.”

I’m sorry his sister died and all, preventing me from temporarily using harsher words about this convenient conversion, but this guy is sounding like a brown Russell Brand.
Acting like a beast doesn’t ever become washed off the record and to assume one is forgiven before death is pure Churchian. To lecture as if one has moral authority from doing evil is pure Satan. Hubris?
I get the feel why so many of these guys are ‘finding’ Jesus is because they want the Have it all I predicted YEARS ago – they want to fuck around with sluts in the pussy parade then have a Christian (best religion for this) waifu once their T-levels drop and they aged out of clubs.

That won’t happen. You need decades to prepare to be a good husband.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/05/29/global-christianity-is-still-globalism/

I don’t spare dishonest women from critique either.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/05/11/is-homemaker-the-new-welfare-queen/

but the I told ya so is STRONG

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/born-again-christians-are-the-worst-cucks/

COPE, manwhores, COPE.

The wages of sin last for decades. Seeing how old PUAs end up will be an object lesson.

In the comments are race-mixing guys trying to claim (appeal to exception) that their kids are different or (gag) better.
Thankfully the odd person is pointing out the basic scientific facts, more or less 1. those kids self-hate, since there’s no place for them in the world and they belong nowhere 2. those kids are clinically depressed and 3. they have health issues (so write off grandkids or great-grandkids). No progeny? Wasted investment. Don’t marry any woman based on sex appeal (esp. fetish), duh?

There’s also direct Bible admonishment: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/03/10/they-dont-quote-this-line/

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/5-20.htm

For why should you, my son, be exhilarated with an adulteress And embrace the bosom of a foreigner?

among other choice lines

comment

“I’d rather become a monk/hermit instead of wifing up a different race than mine or a white slut.

Wait until the Tiger Mom divorces kick in with the next recession.

Asians only stay if you pay.

When your income grows stale, they bail!

Grace trumps race in regards to salvation, but not in the material world. Miscegenation is forbidden by the moral law, yet unless you don’t know some biblical Greek you’ll never know.

I am not a friend of the CI movement, but they have some interesting truth nukes you cannot argue with (scroll down to “The Sixth Commandment”): http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm&#8221;

Here it is:

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

I am rarely impressed but congratulations.

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Wow.

This explains their group-level reproductive issues, if explicitly forbidden by God.

Among other details like marital problems, notably the domestic abuse rate.

And divorce rates.

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

Bloody hell, a gentleman and a scholar.


God split the peoples of the world, this was his will.
The mental and physical health issues prove it.

Why will the sluts deny this?

R-selected men sexually select the outgroup, it’s a dominant indicator of what they are.
This is known.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/128777-a-man-s-sexual-choice-is-the-result-and-the-sum
A man who wants kids with the outgroup is an inferior and he’s backing the horse that might accept him.

““A man’s sexual choice is the result and the sum of his fundamental convictions…. He will always be attracted to the woman who reflects his deepest vision of himself, the woman whose surrender permits him to experience a sense of self-esteem. The man who is proudly certain of his own value, will want the highest type of woman he can find, the woman he admires, the strongest, the hardest to conquer–because only the possession of a heroine will give him the sense of an achievement.””

They bet on a future where you are dead, the Beige people world of NWO planning.

The term is race traitor for a reason. There can be no bargaining with people who want to kill you just as assuredly as suicide bombers. They are actively genociding their white DNA (literally gene-cide*) and replacing you like a cuckoo baby in your homeland (they never wanna move out…). No white woman will submit to them out of disgust, they’re almost entirely gammas. Some are involuntary race mixers because no fellow white will have them! Non-whites use them for babies, green cards and money. Among Asians, white>masculinity, that’s why the same guys almost never land objectively better looking Latinas, where it’s inverted and masculinity is prized.

Prove me wrong, internet. How long do fetish spouses last in hard times?

It isn’t a unique (and biologically validated) disgust:

Why do blacks reject mulattoes because something something colorism?

Why do these guys (pictured) all have the same Look, and only land Asians without trouble?

and the eternal classic

Hence, white gammas go weeb. It’s science, more or less.

Frankly, this one looks gay as John Barrowman.

Gays think they’re in the closet because they’re on that r-select sexual spectrum, preferring less dimorphic women.

Why do all weebs have this soft, shriveled look? Some group of men get together and figure this out.

I’ll be called jealous of women with no waist or hips…. somehow.

*Non-whites gain more than 50% dominance breeding with whites, with our recessive genome, hence the fetish for us globally.
I’ve linked to it at some point here. It was mentioned alongside genetic distance.

comment

“The other races (Negroids and Mongoloids) have been created way earlier than the Caucasoids, which is archaelogically and genetically proven. The blue-eyed-gene for example goes back to exactly one common ancestor. Then how comes no Asian or African has colored eyes?”

True but there’s also multi-regional hypothesis.

“You can read in different historical accounts about the decay that (only) mulatto societies have upon morals and environment.

In no small part to lower IQ than the purebred parents and r-selected sexual strategy (quantity over quality) depressing quality of living. The Third World chooses to be poor, because they choose to have too many children. It’s as simple as that. The low IQ detail is compounded in each generation by improper breeding habits, since crime (like rape) and libido are both higher in that demographic, in any race. If they’re gonna infanticide any sex, the ones who rape and rebel would be better candidates. Then there’s the fact each race evolved to its environment and the mixed race (technically raceless) are not well-adapted to any environment, so you’d expect them to comparatively fail in every environment, since it’s about Darwinian genetic competition with those who didn’t mix. I blame the parents who chose this for them. They’d be most competitive to live in the lower IQ society of one of the parents. That’s why conqueror’s kids are an exception, higher IQ DNA dissolving into a lower IQ society (too low is/should be wiped out) succeeds better than the natives, in that case. It fails when reversed.

Change the white society, lose the society.

Needs more genetics, more studies. Generally correct.

What does ‘good breeding’ actually mean? K-select.

Race-mixers are also, in studies, less attractive on average than same-race counterparts. Children are the IQ mean of the individual parents. Look at the national IQs of these brood women and that’s a terrible mean, plus regression to the mean pulling kids down anyway. Galton, ironically.

The darker a person’s skin, the higher their testosterone, again, compounding the r-selection.

Those white guys will find their beige kids resentful, slutty and probably drawn to SJW politics because in their utopia, everybody belongs. They’ll learn, too late.

Elliot Rodger, that Yang Marxist, more to come, I’m sure.

In the Travels of Marco Polo you have an account (Book I, Chapter 14) in which fair-skinned Tartars took black Indian wifes. The mixed race offspring ravaged the city of Camandu, and even acquired magical and diabolical knowledge they used for their raids.

You may have good intentions but misinformation and lacking in knowledge creates more evil than good. As it is written in Hosea 4:6:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.”

comment

“Instead, he bangs them and then refuses to take part ownership in his own degeneracy.”
Blaming ‘culture’ and ‘society’ and the women is still evading shame. Shame is personal and earned, the bad rep.

What do you expect? They’re r-types! Mentally more akin to a child! Gimme brains!

Let the weeb Other his own kids, as long as he’s happy to self-deport with them when the homeland thing becomes the global norm… again.

That’s in the peaceful scenario.

The SJWs hate ALL white men, even their own father.

Race-mixing won’t be any kind of defense when they come for you, too.

Proof, in the Bible: “21 Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rise against their parents and have them put to death.”

https://biblehub.com/matthew/10-21.htm

Prediction: Roosh will go some kind of Buddhist then Muslim then a weird hybrid.

Because my my my how the tables have fucking TURNED.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/roosh-on-the-alt-right-in-his-own-words/

“The alt right is worse than feminism in attempting to control male sexual behavior”

Why did he choose Christian?

Acceptable races are South American, Persian, Armenian, and European (non-Northern).”

I can hear 8chan fire up the gas chambers on that line.

As if “I’m not white. Why should I care about the future of white societies?” wasn’t bad enough.

He talks about subversion and outsiders ruining any open system. So will he try and get in with the TradCons?

At this point I’ll stop feeding the troll PR unless something major happens.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/some-manospherians-throw-rattle-from-pram-the-alt-right-is-run-by-cucks-now/

I knew this was coming.

Note the ressentiment of ‘it’s secretly the women and their Lilith magic!’ as if adult men aren’t responsible for their own opinions, much like Roosh isn’t responsible for his words coming back to bite him on the a-and I digress.

He wanted his face on it.

They all have the same line. I did that but it isn’t Me anymore. I turned my back on it, accept me. Sure, like a porn star marrying once her career is over. Your Trojan Horse has failed, deal. He finished by saying the phrase ‘rape hysteria’ and playing Damsel because all this attention is apparently a threat to them and their social circle. R-types.

Let’s see if this modest (and holding back) post is taken with the humility we typically expect of this lot.

reading:

https://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=443231

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Roosh_V

Pharisees of the peen.

Roosh V takes the “God Pill,” embracing Jesus after getting super high on shrooms. No, really

Current year, highlight reel.

The future American

Deport them all or say bye to your country.

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/15/668106376/generation-z-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-yet

A “bare majority,” the report notes, of 52 percent are non-Hispanic white, compared to 61 percent of millennials in 2002 when they were in the same age range.

There’s much more Hispanic and Asian presence among the nation’s children and youth today,” says Richard Fry, a senior research at Pew who co-authored the report with Kim Parker.

I hear the locust of the apocalypse. It smells like soy sauce.

Nearly half of post-Millennials are racial or ethnic minorities

Assuming 100% of them were “Christian”, your cultural, political and genetic futures are still dead.

CHINO is multicultural Christianity, and it’s bullshit. An Italian Christian is not an English Christian is not a Syrian Christian is not a Jamaican Christian is not a Chink Christian. That’s multiculturalism via the back door.

Chromosomes make culture, as HBD study proves.

i.e. Asians will never be honorary whites.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894685/

With obvious consequence:

Jesus said to spread the Word, not mix genetics. God split the languages and the peoples on PURPOSE.

Asians most American immigrants + why

https://www.pewresearch.org/faQct-tank/2019/06/17/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/

You are being replaced.

You won’t be throwing the Asians in the camps this time.

When war breaks out, they’ll be throwing Whitey.

By 2055, Asians are projected to be the largest immigrant group living in the United States, and will make up some 38% of all immigrants by 2065, followed by Hispanics (31%), whites (20%) and blacks (9%). source

not including those born there and anchor mixed babies, because for every loss of a fertile European to a mixed breeding relationship, it’s a direct gain for the non-white side …per child.

Zero sum.

And you lose.

Look at all the tradcucks, they’re not with black women. They’re (((paid))).

https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2641.html

Paper, 2019: The Evolving Israel-China Relationship

“China wants to sustain its relationship with Israel while continuing to enjoy good relations with countries in the Arab and Muslim worlds, particularly Iran

“Israel seeks to expand its diplomatic and economic ties with the world’s fastest growing major economy and diversify its export markets and sources of investments

trans., Ebonics: You iz fucked, mah niggas.

Am I imagining that?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/16/israel-china-haifa-port-deal-triggers-us-navy-push/

Well?

Silence from the weeb gallery. If you’d sell out your ancestors for some pedo gash, I’m not the problem.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/israel-china-relations/

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

The Western economies have been drained, meet who They intend to replace you with.

Marvel went to shit with Avengers 2 and Magical Mary Sue Asian Waifu Doctor of Everything.

Alongside Black Ghetto Teen ‘Iron Man’.

Read: https://www.geek.com/tech/the-biggest-plot-hole-in-captain-america-civil-war-happened-because-marvel-loves-china-1654617/

Read very carefully.

“The US government would never, never, ever let Cap and Tony use phones from an off-brand Chinese phone manufacturer,” writes Segan, “especially after the huge controversies around Huawei and ZTE and whether their phones are full of backdoors for the Chinese government.”

May, 2016.

They never include mixed for a reason but one-drop applies to Asian half-breeds too.

Who are you not allowed to criticize?

Meanwhile, 62% of Americans surveyed said that immigrants strengthen the country “because of their hard work and talents,” while 28% say immigrants are a burden because they take jobs, housing and health care away from US-born citizens

That’s really solid anti-white rhetoric, if whites had no work ethic (Christian) and talent (IQ) then there would be no America. I see the attempts at self loathing (part of mentacide) are still effective brainwashing.

Land of opportunity – except for the whites who built it, they just lazy dumb rednecks.

https://www.thequint.com/news/business/h-1b-workers-have-minimal-skills-says-infosys-whistleblower

There is no need for immigration, ever. We can use visas, there is no need to extend citizenship.

Displacing whites is a good thing, innit?