Grasping at relevance, huh?
I’m not gonna link since that’d be throwing money at it.
Here’s the comment I made, which sums it up nicely.
Actually women have been the sex voting more rightward in Europe and recent trends in voting have made women swing conservative in general (over men) but Roosh has never let facts intrude on a piece of ‘satire’. Just look at recent elections and referenda, and still he …blames women, a majority of the population with enough numbers to swing it. American women are not typical of the world’s supply and Europeans are sick of reading that particular lie. Essentially, he’s arguing to strip low-commitment, low-loyalty r-types of the right to vote, without naming the r-type (because he is one). We used to do that with property requirements, since r-types are nomadic and property taxes were the only taxes (so you vote for where your money goes or don’t vote). That was not equal, but fair. Also, it wasn’t ‘women’s suffrage’ but universal, women’s suffrage is a feminist myth. Learning history is hard when male power-trip fantasy is so much more alluring than looking at the demographics data of recent elections.
I forgot to mention Millennial women are more conservative than their living predecessors.
And Gen Z are heavily conservative too.
Facts are hard when you’re a degenerate liar.
From here on out it’s an explanation of the r-psychology, with Roosh as Exhibit Gay. [this definition] It’s bitchy to match their level since, if you’re going to attack people randomly, expect them to get defensive.
A little on Europe.
The First World is the only place its values exist in the universe, we developed these with major wars, some civil wars and major historical reformations and enlightenments. We earned this way of life. These people, historical enemies, stepped into our house (without invitations) and took all the goodies paid for with our ancestor’s blood. They expect to get more than they give and skip the country whenever they like, owing us nothing. They’re already on thin ice with their treatment of our too-kind Christian hospitality (from pathological altruism, still finite ). Anyone questions these fundamentals and we come down on them like a ton of bricks. This is OURS, get bent. They totally deserve that rejection for rejecting what makes us, Us, and therefore worthy of their pillaging, because if they want to sample Non-First World living, go ahead. Good riddance. Except those people are narcissists and can’t stand to think of the First World being happy. They’re toxic civilization-breakers. Fifth columnists, saboteurs and snitches.
Like we’re all too dumb to notice the past and present runnings of our native countries. All hundreds of millions of us in civilized Europe. And yes, we need the advice of foreign mystery meat! Because white men in Europe are incompetent, right Roosh?
Everything about Europe was shit until you got here!! For millennia we have struggled! Thank the gods you’ve finally arrived! You’ve been so good for the people of every nation you’ve ‘banged’!
Common sense would argue:
If some people are unworthy of First World rights, simply deport them to where they belong.
Not all countries or its genetic Volk can uphold the glories of First World liberty. OK. Not everyone can be smart enough or capable enough to run things to the highest known standard.
Everyone will be better off! Everyone will be happier! We’ll stop trying to turn a cat into a dog by putting a leash on it and truly embrace cultural diversity! …except the narcissists. Who are only happy when this applies: misery loves company. Basically, never take a narcissist’s advice on the Good Thing To Do. They lack the empathy. Relational narcissism is a thing.
Which country is the Sodom of our times? The one we should take as a negative case study? The one who started this Melting Pot shit? The one obsessed with materialism, gangster culture and money?
America is the paragon of patriarchal virtues! Let’s all listen to those guys!
You don’t get a pat on the head for doing your adult duties.
Seriously, the US must have all its statute up online like the Parliament website.
I’ve seen various congressional and state ruling paperwork, but they never go over it and examine their priors.
I would myself but then I’ll be accused of bias for being both foreign and female.
I have however broken down election data on my own country, various demographic data by race, sex and age. The biggest predictor? AGE. Increasing the voting age or bringing in military service for everyone adult prior to voting (not ageist) would work better. But damn, they might have to stop valiantly defending the West from their keyboard for five minutes and pick up a gun.
Why be masculine when you can make a career out of talking about it?
These people brag about having multiple passports but they aren’t traitors, no!
They complain about terrorism and demand government Do Something. Well traditionally, they’d form an army out of you….
They expect a White Saviour (like Trump)… but hate on white nationalism, in white-spawned countries.
So he contents himself to crawl around waiting for approval by mimicking Vox Day (that won’t work, VD is a respected author).
They could earn some passing respect by actually looking at the damn data.
-they don’t know how. Idiots
-they don’t care. Liars
There’s a distinct 3rd possibility.
They did, didn’t find the answer they wanted, and due to publication bias, left it in the drawer.
If he sets foot on most European soil after that article, he could easily be up on human rights charges.
Satire doesn’t mean what you think it means. Calling FIRE in a theatre is still illegal. Mumbling the adult equivalent of ‘just kidding’ will make the judges angry. The male judges.
Well, he’s questioning the legal structure of foreign governments and suggesting an oppression – because oppression doesn’t exist. On incitement or sedition grounds alone, he could just disappear. That would be 100% his fault. It’s like stepping into a tiger enclosure and expecting not to get eaten. You do not bully the bigger guy, even if he seems tame. Ignorance of the ECJ law or EU law in general won’t be an excuse if the feminists (rightfully, for once) in this case, get you arrested for being a misogynist (stripping women of rights is A-grade proof in court, practically a working definition for the prosecution and he has not met the Burden of Proof for a ‘debate’ aside from hand-waving and emotional appeal, which does quite add to the misogyny thing). It cannot be simultaneously all A Joke and All A Serious Debate, depending which lawn looks safer today. Serious clowns do not exist. The fact it’s about running The West, to which he does not truly belong, means the American Free Speech shit does not apply.
Rights belong to citizens. Citizens are loyal and dutiful and don’t oppress their peers, their legal equals. Oddly he is legally arguing that women have their citizenship rights revoked, the only way to restrict liberties, but in other materials, borders are just an idea (HBD says no). R-types always lie, even if they tell a truth it’s in bad faith to manipulate a 3rd party. It’s easy to spot by who says you’re too dumb to handle the data yourself…
It’s like he doesn’t know who Britain’s favourite person is. Nor how much power the monarchy have in Europe, let alone their common sex.
If they can murder their Muslim-breeding daughter-in-law, they can murder you.
European men don’t spend most of their free time bitching about the opposite sex, including those who live in America. We still remember the sexes need to get along for the race or species to survive. The culture clash is making even the redpill male friends of mine cringe away from these ‘losers’ explaining away their undesirability and start siding with the feminists, ‘in theory’.
He’s also clearly creeping to sex slavery of all women by revoking First World liberties aka AA with sex for ‘incel’ males (incels do not exist).
Is that the Muslim genes or the Jewish ones coming out? A harem system like Asia leads to war and over time fewer women anyway since they’re murdered post-birth. And the guys running a harem are military. And rich. Aka none of the things these bitches could be. They’re also atheists so all appeals to Muh Bible fall flat.
The misogynist-pointers at Biblical verse are actually quoting Judaism or referencing a blend of its pantheon with Eve (that is blasphemy), based on the Jewish character of Lilith.
AKA nothing to do with Christians.
It’s as trite as the MGTOW cry of White men! Abandon your women! Never reproduce!* They want the brown ones anyway! We’ll gladly take them off your hands brother! They’re whores anyway, that’s why rape doesn’t exist!
*That’s how you can tell they’re ideologically aligned with SJWs.
Sex positive? Check.
They really haven’t looked up Iceland, have they?
‘The next year, “Iceland’s parliament passed a law guaranteeing equal rights for women and men.”
This was over something MINOR.
Fathers do not work as many hours as mothers, you can look it up but none of you will breed so thankfully it doesn’t matter to you. Childrearing and housekeeping are not fun, they are laborious or men would be lining up to do it and get paid.
You disrespect the valuable work women do, they strike. Which sex does the survival of the species rely on? Which sex is the primary caregiver? Which hand rocks the cradle? This is DARWIN. Kipling said ‘the female of the species is deadlier than the male’…. why do you think that is, Kemosabe?
If men are in fact superior, hypothetically…(the literal misogynist’s unscientific position to dehumanize women and strip us of agency/liberty, when they/we are merely sexually dimorphic) then logically at least most of what the feminists say must be true, since in nature the stronger dominates the weaker. This would necessitate the weaker to rightfully defend themselves. Choose your own ending, moron.
If you haven’t read the Bible, you may want to mull over why it’s women in the verse ‘Hell hath no fury…’
Consider very carefully if you wish to fuck with a strong majority of the globe, r-type scum.
It’s the Pandora’s Box of civilization. Because if the men all rally together, that obscures other topics like race, religion, age bracket, even partisanship! Convenient for self-aware r-types trying to get in with the Ks for protecting before the fighting starts (a kind of warfare cuckoldry, hiding safely behind the lines and letting the Real Men fight for you like a dusky damsel). And choosing as your opponents the one group that can’t match you in physical strength…. brave. They wouldn’t dare punch another man, but they’re happy to start on women, assuming we’ll never fight back. Yeah, they’re idyllic defenders of The West…. hiding behind other men. Usually white men. Brave and strong and independent little rebels.
The feminists want a ‘Gender War’ – because men are going to lose.
World War G.
Men don’t even play well with one another. An all-male island would be a bloodbath. There’s no historical example of it. Sparta punished bachelors with a special tax. Roosh just wants to hide away until white men have taken white women’s rights away (temporarily) to increase his mating chances, especially if those men (superior competition) die in the process. Typical r-strategy, shout, run and hide. They have literally nothing to lose.
The r-type calls for things and asks you to do them for it.
Sorry, are you all his wife suddenly? He can’t even find one woman to agree to legally bind herself to him and his money, obviously he’s defective. He cannot run a single household and he has no child investments, he has no idea how to run a society (especially one of the outgroup, racially). Ghetto trash has more family values than Roosh V.
Let’s you and him fight – the cowardly r-type strategy of triangulation, to befriend the victor and free up resources (here, women). Let’s you and her fight – a level of scumbag that isn’t human(e). If men win, befriend men and take credit as Idea Guy for rewards (given women like goats). If women win, most men are dead, take excess supply of women – whether they want to be or not (smells like rape o’clock). You can move the rape genes to civilization but you can’t civilize rape genes.
Men, seriously. Anyone calling for a fight who isn’t willing to lead it is trying to kill you.
Western men are too soft to survive. HE KNOWS THIS.
He wants to kill your genes and your culture.
Traitor in our midst.
Eggs = expensive. Sperm = cheap. Foreva….
Finally, in fantasy land of Xenu Warrior Princes.
What happens if men ‘win’ but no woman will reproduce with them?
Unless you’re a happy genetic suicide like Roosh V, who can’t buy a wife with all his shekels, don’t listen to it?
He’s goading you to attack your future. This is all painfully obvious to women thanks to EQ. We know a conniving traitorous bitch when we see one. However, it’s unfair to call someone a traitor per se, when they were never one of us. Look up his background.
They claim a romantic script where they explain away their promiscuity by saying it’s a quest for The One. They don’t believe in a one. The next woman who takes their fancy, they will claim might be the One, so when it goes wrong (his fault) he gets to blame someone else (her).
It’s never their fault.
They’re incapable of monogamy or keeping a woman (r-types), why would they want a one?
What’s their reaction to happily married men? Disgust, confusion and loathing.
Yeah, they don’t want Miss Right, unless it’s followed by Now.
It’s easy to reveal when they imagine she’s simultaneously easy for him but difficult to ‘conquer’ (like an object or land staked by a flag) by all other men.
That isn’t how humans work. Ever. Either they’re sluts or they aren’t, but these guys expect the ‘right woman’, who magically sees Mr Sociopath’s value to use and abuse them, would dote on them like a mother, plus sex. It’s very Freud because mother cannot abandon them and many called a sociopath here in these types of article are misdiagnosed male borderlines.
However, when a woman turns out to be easy, they put her in a list called Not the One.
When a woman turns out to be unreceptive to his advances, same list.
All women end up on that list.
That is his choice.
They expect finding love (conflated with sex) isn’t difficult. That is madness.
But sociopaths are inherently lazy, they expect EVERYTHING to come easy.
Including a person.
When that doesn’t happen, narcissistic rage or manipulation ensues (to provoke the response desired or your own rage, so they can cue their own rage and blame you).
Hence it’s critical you don’t rise to their bait and cut them off from attention, they see attention as a reward for their behaviour. Those so-called bitches are just onto them.
Send them to a professional, they won’t go. Even shrinks cannot fix them.
Men playing the sympathy card flag up.
““I am sure that if the devil existed, he would want us to feel very sorry for him,” Martha Stout confirms in The Sociopath Next Door. “If you find yourself often pitying someone who consistently hurts you or other people and who actively campaigns for your sympathy, the chances are close to 100 percent that you are dealing with a sociopath.””
Men cannot be simultaneously superior and weaker. Pick one.
“Sociopaths want to be the center of your world. If they’re not, it becomes much harder to exert control. To do that, many will introduce another person into the relationship to upset the balance and make you glom onto them harder. A straight-up affair would be too easy (and risky) to reveal. Usually, these come in the form of an old friend who just has to come along on your dates, an attractive bartender he can’t stop talking to, or even his phone. Anything that when you complain about it, suddenly you’re the insecure/melodramatic/crazy one.”
They call that ‘dread game’ but the term round here is called being a shithead.
They think this is ‘harmless’ (lie) or funny (gaslighting).
Relates to triangulation, a form of abuse using a 3rd party.
Simple Q: are they trying to make you feel bad? Out of the two of you, who did something bad?
“Denying what they’re clearly doing is called gaslighting, and it’s an incredibly damaging practice.”
“The sociopath mindset is fascinating. Generally, they believe they are smarter than everyone else, and because of that, life is set up to punish them. Listen to the way your partner talks about themselves. What kind of stories do they regularly tell? And what role do they play? If every story features them one-upping someone (at any cost) or how they were thwarted (by cruel forces clearly out to get them) they may be subtly revealing their worldview.
“The sense of entitlement that comes with sociopathy is astonishing to those who abide by the social laws and conventions of our culture,”
Idealization (lies) and devaluation (lies). Sense a pattern?
“this rage fuels their sense that they have the right to act out in whichever way they happen to choose at the time.”
they are more emotional than an hysterical woman grieving, that’s why they tend to hate women, they project their sensitivity as a sign of womanhood to displace guilt… and excuse themselves when they ‘punish’ women in or with relationships with them
sure, they’re the victim
Borderline is already under-diagnosed in women, more often depression, histrionic personality, (ego, identity) anxiety or narcissism.
But male borderlines are under-diagnosed even more than that. Usually men are tarred as sociopaths (antisocial personality) if they feel empty, or narcissitic personality if they’re grandiose (faking it).
A lot of manosphere and self-proclaimed redpill types match this, and even complain when (other) borderlines are attracted to them, or plain narcissists (there is a co-dependency between the conditions in romantic attachments, the NPD feeds off the BPD’s attention and false identity is created like an ego plug, for both).
Red flags to look for include:
- Frequent romantic relationships (often too close together): Do you know a male who has been with tons of women? Did this guy feel guilty or did they feel admired? Believe it or not, some males with BPD symptoms will date multiple women (feel guilty later) and refuse to commit due to a fear of abandonment. Other males will “scare” their spouses away with their quick tempers, argumentativeness, and sometimes even physical aggression. An interaction with a male with BPD may include the individual saying any and everything to trigger their spouses anger. Their relationships may be frequent and too fast. Individuals with BPD tend to be emotional which is why some individuals pursue multiple relationships that begin too fast and end before you can blink.
- Drama laden behaviors and attitudes: Most of society, primarily men, would say that “women are dramatic.” Some women would agree. In fact, it is a natural thing for women to be emotional with all of the emotions and hormonal fluctuations. But for males, the drama would look at bit different. For example, I previous worked with a 13 year old male who would come to therapy idealizing me and his work with me almost all month until the final week of the month when he would become very detached emotionally and standoffish. He fluctuated between liking me and confiding in me, to rejecting my ideas and therapeutic support. During these “episodes,” he would also break up with a girl and pursue another. He would also reach out to old girlfriends via texting with the excuse that: “I didn’t end things right, I need to make it right.” This continued for years.
- Roller Coaster emotions, thoughts, and behaviors: Again, as stated above, most men are not dramatic but sometimes the way in which emotions are expressed can feel like multiple personalities. Men with BPD will often become “hot” and “cold,” change perspective quickly, or exhibit very angry and hostile emotions toward others. This is the type of person who will exhibit a consistent and stable pattern of behavior, perhaps even for a long time, and then quickly change into what seems like a completely different person. An example of this would be a teenager being a “daddy’s girl” one moment, and then later telling the father how awful of a person he is and how unfair his parenting is.
- Hot and Cold interactions with others:Some individuals with BPD really struggle with relationships and often have trouble with interpretation of comments, body language, and emotions. For example, a male with BPD might find it quite disturbing that his wife speaks to other men while in public. He might begin to behave oddly such as being emotionally distant, becoming easily angered, not openly communicating, or begin taking everything personally. This same man may later act as if nothing happened and instantly appear to be one of the most fair spouses you could ever have. The emotions of BPD are like a roller coaster at times and it can be difficult to determine what emotion the individual might exhibit from one moment to another.
- Frequent suicide attempts or SIB: It is a known fact within the world of psychology and psychiatry that individuals with suicidal ideations (i.e., thoughts), gestures, or threats will often use suicide as a way to manipulate their loved ones or somehow prove that they are “lovable.” For example, the man above on #4 might become so jealous of his wife talking to other men than he decides to tell his wife that he will kill himself if she does not refuse to talk to other men.In this case, suicidal thoughts, threats, or in gestures is used to manipulate someone else. However, there are individuals who are seriously considering suicide because the symptoms of BPD “causes” difficulties in various domains.The pain is so intensified including the fear of abandonment that suicidal thoughts may temporarily comfort the sufferer.
- Attention seeking behaviors: Some individuals with BPD (primarily adolescents with BPD traits) crave attention, even if it is negative. The loud attitude, the blatant and aggressive words, the criticism, the accusations of being unloved and abandoned all draw attention to the individual. Males who exhibit BPD traits will often cut themselves or harm themselves in some way and then draw attention to how they harmed themselves. Other males with BPD traits may engage in risky behaviors such as unprotected sex, having multiple mother of multiple children, domestically abusing his family, making threats to keep everyone afraid and confused, or entertaining a negative group of peers (e.g., gang involvement),
- Dependency/co-dependency: Co-dependency or dependency is often a very common symptom of BPD. As stated above, the fear of abandonment makes it difficult for individuals with BPD to maintain safe, healthy, an satisfying relationships. On the other hand, there may be times when someone connected to the individual with BPD begins to rely, emotionally and psychologically, on the individual with BPD. The relationship is dependent upon the other individual who may be just as (or more) emotionally and psychologically unstable.
- Anger outbursts but social charm: Many of us are used to hearing that sociopaths or narcissists are superficial, shallow, and manipulative. But we must also consider that an individual with BPD (who may also have other diagnoses) can become very angry to the point of manipulating situations or responding to confrontations/arguments inappropriately. Anger outbursts can occur more than we think in individuals with BPD.
To any kind of personality condition, they refuse to accept responsibility for their actions or the outcomes because it’s so integral to who they are, they cannot conceive other means. It will always be the fault of the Other e.g. so a gay BPD man will blame all Other man, a straight BPD man will blame all Other/ all women, see what I mean with the manosphere thing? Is that not exactly what they do?
Despite claiming to be alpha (no grit, no LT plans like a psychopath) and chill (apathetic), they frequently burst into rage online, in articles and videos and in person. They usually have domestic abuse accusations on file, but like a psycho, play victim. You can’t be the strong one and the victim. However, they’re highly emotional and try to talk out of this with rationalization, confusing it for rationality because again, they have no true identity so may think they’re ASPD and secretly getting one over on everything, but in truth they don’t even know what those things mean e.g. loyalty, love, rationality, they lack a sense of self like a baby.
PUA appears to be an excuse that all the antisocial behaviours are signalled as positive e.g.
I’m not a slut, I’m a stud!
Women don’t want me? Women can’t have me! Nobody can hold me down!
I’m not dramatic, I’m exciting!
Draining? You’ll miss me when I’m gone!
I’m not mean, I’m funny!
I treat them badly because they deserve it, and I deserve to be worshipped because I am Manly Man McAlpha!
I’m not lonely, I’m a lone wolf!
I could get any woman I want, they’d be so lucky to have a user like me.
When I’m cold, it’s cool. When a woman’s cold, she’s a frigid bitch and there’s something wrong with her.
Now, if you are a heterosexual man, it’s possible that you simply haven’t particularly noticed that men are complicated and difficult to figure out. There’s a good chance you haven’t noticed, because you haven’t dated them. But that doesn’t mean women are any more complicated than men to decipher… it just means the fact that dating men is complicated doesn’t impact you at all, if you are a heterosexual man.
Here is where the hardcore defenders of the “Why are women so…?” trope will reply with the following defense:
“I never said that men are not (stupid, angry, dishonest, etc). Sure, they might be that way too. But at this moment I’m just asking about the women!”
The problem with that is that, to put it bluntly, asking the wrong question can lead you to the wrong answers. If the reason some people are complicated and difficult to figure out have to do with general human characteristics, then looking at specifically female traits will not lead you to the correct answer. It’s misdirection. It will make it harder for you to actually be able to figure out what’s going on.
The blame game is popular with liars trying to excuse their own personal failings and loser status.
The question is loaded. It’s a false dichotomy that implies men are Not X.
However, while whining and guffawing over NAWALT, on the topic of rape they pipe up with NAMALT.
The psychiatric issues cannot be denied.
OT but I’ll put it here
He wasn’t even handsome.
Seriously, all the ‘straight men’ calling him attractive need a good, long look in the mirror but that involves coming out of the closet on the other side.
He looked like a puffy sex doll, with the middle distance porn star stare. Definite creeper vibe, probable anime fetish. It’s mostly in the lips. We call that a trout pout but it’s a pretty good indicator of whorishness since it’s usually a result of Botox. He looked like a strange ambiguous anime character on a balloon or bobblehead. At least very femme for a man. He looked about 13. This case disproves a lot of supposedly redpill truisms e.g. rich guys always win, women will sleep with anything if it’s cocky enough, hypergamy is a female thing instead of a projection of male ambition, women are superficial but also don’t care about looks, you need a car and the alpha mindset (WTF NLP BS is that, alpha males IRL have children and ONE mate) and finally, mixed race is the future. I guess that’s why they have high rejection rates both on dating websites and organ donation. Evil, bigoted biology, amirite?
I still see ‘redpill men’ going on about the injustice of it.
The world doesn’t owe you sex. That’s entitlement. No IFs or BUTs. That’s entitlement. Put down the porn. They’re the male Sandra Flukes expecting the rest of us to give them orgasms…. because they exist, therefore they deserve it.
If you’re basing your lifestyle on a rapper, you’re doing Life wrong.
If your ‘bang’ (shudder) is on birth control, you shouldn’t feel proud. They aren’t ‘selecting’ you for anything. Darwin doesn’t apply to sterile sex and even IF she got pregnant, you’d be the first lot to 180 your ‘principles’ (really signals) and demand an abortion OR an exemption from child support (so Alpha, to abandon your children, so strong, not to mention cuckolding some other guy you call Beta, such brotherly love). You aren’t proving your masculinity, your Alpha-ness or anything other than your ability to be a throbbing dildo or otherwise vaginal plug while she’s between ‘boyfriends’. Where’s the victory here.
If you think hypersexuality is a positive force for society, you’re a feminist.
They would agree with that sentiment, I think. I have no illusions where these supposedly right-wing males stand. The lays never lie. Your politics is proven by your personal life.
The rest of the world won’t fetishize your child the way you fetishized their mother with some Oriental BDSM BS. Don’t expect everyone to agree with your vision or, as the feminists themselves call it, fuck your beauty standards.
If you think about it, he’s trying to emulate his parents’ relationship with his Daddy’s money, like a male Paris Hilton. I don’t know what to comment about that, let’s leave it.
If you actually read his manifesto, it doesn’t go on about women per se.
It goes on about white, blonde women.
How dare they not let him buy them? Like, we’re people? He knows what they need, like he’s their surrogate Sugar Daddy father figure. [Protip for women: if any man hints at trying to roleplay your father or a Daddy-like figure, run, he’s an r-type. Ks want an equal force in the home, they don’t actually control contrary to r-type belief, because they don’t need to, they know their woman is good.] He cares about women so much he thought we are disposable objects, not future wives and mothers capable of making our own decisions, including knowing when to reject someone who’s clearly missing a couple of screws. Consent requires a basic level of intelligence to know when and what to reject. [Also why if women can’t vote, fucking them would be pedophilia, legally. Either we have agency and can make such weighty decisions like reproduction or not. Pick ONE.]
That’s right, your mystery meat White Saviour was anti-white. Why do you want this supposed beta uprising if you’re doing so well IRL and also not beta or lower yourself? Is this not some delta revenge fantasy?
And being nice gets you nothing. That’s called the First World standard. It’s the minimum. You aren’t special for being polite to women because women are people, the same way women aren’t entitled to a drink because they smiled at a guy.
A puppy is nice.
Nobody wants to fuck a puppy.
Have the standards for husband slipped so low?
The self-aware r-types try to win women from both sides by signalling K. Run away. They’re crazy. Leave them to the cokeheads and sluts. Let the genetic suicides get on with it and burn out their pleasure circuits. Yes, that’s what burnout is.
They’re the ones thirty years from now wondering where his Dream Woman went and/or why she never showed up.
She married another man. It’s a competition. For female fertility. You lost it.
Timing is everything? You need to select from your age-peer group while the pickings are good (preferably below 30). Divorce risk increases with age gap.
“A man that doesn’t talk nicely about women has never felt like he was worthy of them, and probably spent many years feeling like he could not handle them.
Which means there is a good chance he doesn’t feel like he could handle you. Some men are just downright bitter and angry towards females and see them as a pain because they have felt rejected by them their whole lives.”
“Nature didn’t make us to be smart all the time; it made us to be as easily willing to have sex as possible with the man who got to our ears by sweet talking so we could pass on our genes and propagate the human species.”
“Some men just constantly blame women for things that go wrong in their life. There’s a legitimate reason for this; men don’t understand women; so they cannot handle them; and when they can’t handle them and they see their lives falling apart, then the EASIEST thing to do is look for someone to blame; a WOMAN!
See – If a man’s reaction to problems in the relationship is to blame you, or constantly point out where you went wrong, then you have a problem.”
“If a man talks badly about men who are married, or who are taking care of children, then it’s a pretty good sign he doesn’t care much for a deep commitment with a woman.”
It’s like a feminist saying how much she admires single mothers.
What is any sane man going to think of that?
R-types. Be vigilant.
For example, the single dating pool will contain almost all the misogynists, those who fear women*, a far higher proportion than the world at large. Very few trick a woman into an unhappy marriage and it rarely lasts. So yes, encountering more bad apples when dating is correct flagging but you need to spot and next those, to move onto the ones in your league.
* Yes fear. They fear women. They avoid women. Why avoid something inferior to you? Wanna know a secret?
Men are terrified of women. All of them. They rarely admit it and then just from the sides e.g. women are mysterious, women are crazy, I’ll never understand women. If it’s a descriptor you could apply to a bear, they’re scared.
Are women intimidated by men? No. The trappings of success or the threat of violence.
Men are intimidated by talking to us alone, let alone in large groups. QED.