Well obviously men can be raped

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-49057533

it’s just far less common due to the higher upper body strength of male attackers to females (easier pickings)

but like many rapists, the female (or unstudied, more common male on male) kind will incapacitate the victim if they can (proving intent) with alcohol, other drugs or physical restraints, like the male-to-female counterparts

“Another is that men view all sexual opportunities with women as positive.” more Jewish lies

“In fact, Weare says, “an erection is purely a physiological response to stimulus”.” they get it for no reason during sleep…. more porn lies that physical arousal = mental consent. Women are wet most of the time, it’s just the body keeping everything running, but porn lies.

“Men can obtain and sustain an erection even if they’re scared, angry, terrified etc,” she says. – more likely, especially in children or virgins or someone with a moral reason to object like religion, because fear is physical arousal.

Men own their own bodies, it should be assumed they do not give consent, that’s how the system works. Legally, the assumption is no. Like a bank can’t take your money assuming you consent. The military can’t deploy you assuming you consent to join. Porn has gaslighted white men into thinking their only value is sex toy for cheap women.

The only legitimization of consent that worked was the traditional society solution of marriage. But rape by fraud has always been illegal, including where the non-consent (because all consent has conditions, like the person being who they claim, certain contraception being used etc) was known by both parties at the time.

But consent doesn’t hold up outside an honour society, especially when sexual predators are also compulsive liars.

The ignorance about biology is intentional, blame the victim.

“There’s also research that shows women can respond sexually when they are raped (e.g. have an orgasm) because their body is responding physiologically. This is an issue for both male and female victims that is not discussed enough, but there is clear evidence in this area.”

forced orgasm is not pleasant, for either sex, it’s actually a form of pain, physical and mental

(((porn))) lies

this is about as surprising as the knee hammer test causing a reflex kick

for the same reasons, reflex, nerves

even electricity can stimulate men to orgasm, the pain of extreme electricity too

not that it’s common in female cases, they just are physically capable of it because stress tenses muscles

again quelle surprise

the brain cannot shut off the spine, it’s biologically impossible

A number of the participants in Weare’s 2017 study reported FTP experiences after getting extremely drunk or high, and being unable to stop what was happening.

In the first world, people should be able to get drunk without being raped.

Or what’s the first world?

One of those interviewed for the new study describes going home with a woman after a night out clubbing, and blacking out after being given what he suspects was a date rape drug. He says he was then forced to engage in non-consensual sex.

That could’ve turned into an kidney murder story too. Clubbing is really hunting grounds for some r-types. Hold the bars responsible for the drugs. Sometimes the bartender’s in on it.

Although (anti-white) misogynistic murderers/rapists (future serial killers) have a new excuse: “sex games”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/25/fatal-hateful-rise-of-choking-during-sex

while no human can actually ‘consent’ to be murdered, attempted or otherwise

it reminds me of the dysmorphia people who want to be blinded or have their legs chopped off

their consent isn’t valid for self-harm

and the “I was just following orders” excuse has never flown

they say porn has no influence on behaviour but it should clearly be banned, trafficking issues aside

it’s (((their))) way of ruining families and marriages with global mental competition.

The Bible clearly states looking at another with lust is adultery. Porn is un-Christian and clearly Satanic (all the violence kinda hints).

The misogynist murderers like the kink excuse because 1. it’s something to brag about in this sick world and 2. it humiliates the innocent woman. It also implicitly tries to justify what was rape – of them while alive or as a corpse, obviously they’re admitting to necrophilia. And the charges are being REDUCED for that.

All rapists are r-types, sexually aggressive up to cruelty, just write laws that punish r-types and leave the good men and women alone.

I assumed the men being raped also exhibited the researched (and linked here) “freeze” behaviour?

in women, the post-trauma freeze response leaves more semen inside, increasing the probability of pregnancy.

Another describes being coerced into sex while working at a holiday camp one summer, while he was a student. A female co-worker had discovered a letter he had written to a boyfriend, and threatened to out him as gay unless he slept with her.

Coercion vitiates consent, still rape.

As for the fantasy line, lad culture is toxic to young men (funded by magazines pushing holidays on men) and it’s also impossible to have a fantasy (controlled) about something you do not control (an attack). What those ones actually have is a domination fantasy, inaccurately and immorally described as ‘rape’.

The choking thing is a Muslim fantasy, however. Nobody will study that.

The bloodletting extension is Jewish, like that creepy comic writer in America.

Strangulation – fatal and non-fatal – “squeezing”, “neck compression” or, as some call, it “breath-play” – is highly gendered. On average, one woman in the UK is strangled to death by her partner every two weeks, according to Women’s Aid. It is a frequent feature of non-fatal domestic assault, as well as rape and robbery where women are the victims. It is striking how seldom it is seen in crimes against men.

misogynists, as well as being would-be rapists (opportunity or not) also have fantasies of murder they eventually want to act on

it’s been known since Jack the Ripper

Numerous studies have shown that non-fatal strangulation is one of the highest markers for future homicide, which is why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and most US states have developed preventative legislation to strengthen police, prosecutorial and sentencing policies that surround it. In most US states, for example, it is now compulsory for police to charge strangulation assaults as felonies. Yet in the UK, they can fall under battery – the mildest assault possible.

so is a bruise, for comparison

since they love choking so much, bring back hanging

what’s good for the goose is good for the gander

Susan Edwards, a barrister and law professor, has spent decades fighting to make strangulation a stand-alone offence.

21st century.

“In the UK, it’s routinely minimised at every level,” she says. “It’s presented as a momentary loss of control. Attempted strangulations often leave no visible injury and fatal cases too frequently end in light sentences. You hear things such as ‘lover’s tiff’. A cardiac arrest can occur within seconds during strangulation, so there’s also the defence that strangulation wasn’t the cause of death.”

hypoagency in misogynists, imagine my shock

“women are the weaker sex, which is why you need to dominate them with violence”
“I didn’t mean to kill her your Honour! it was only attempted!”

And now, a new defence has been added to the mix – consent. Fiona Mackenzie, an actuary, set up We Can’t Consent to This following the outcry over the so-called “rough sex killing” of Natalie Connolly, 26, by her millionaire partner John Broadhurst, 40. Despite the victim having 40 separate injuries, including serious internal trauma, a fractured eye socket and bleach on her face, Broadhurst received a sentence of three years, eight months for manslaughter.

Bleach on her face trying to dispose of the body. For those not in the know.

Do not defend a psychopath MO.

“People were talking about this defence as if it was one isolated incident and I knew it wasn’t,” says Mackenzie. Although English law does not recognise consent to choking – or any physical harm – in the context of consensual sex, the Labour MP Harriet Harman has just announced her intention to have this underlined again in the forthcoming domestic violence bill. “It needs more emphasis because defence teams are increasingly offering it up, maybe because rough sex has crept into the mainstream,” says Mackenzie. “I’ve had so many women get in touch to say they have been horrified on Tinder dates by partners who have choked them during sex. If you’re dating, it’s expected of you and if you don’t go along with it, you’re boring.”

not consenting to attempted murder

PUAs are rapists, more proof – because she can’t withdraw consent if she cannot talk.

No really, that’s a given reason. I’ve seen on forums they claim it works because she can’t tell you to stop.

“But the next thing I remember is waking up gasping for breath with him on top of me. I’m not sure how long I passed out for. I booked an Uber at 6.30am to get the hell out of there. The next day, I saw the bruises on my chest. We spoke after this and all he said was that, ‘we both got a bit carried away’.”

You have to go to A&E, brain damage possible with any ‘passing out’.

Blaming her, yep, PUA. It’s incitement to attack women in many cases, including overt advice to choke a woman to display ‘alpha’.

At what point does stupid trip over into evil?

“Both those women were very young, and very drunk, killed by much older men they had met just hours before,” Mackenzie says.

Textbook sexual sadist.

There’s going to be a register, isn’t there?

But, historically, it has been “niche” and an overwhelmingly male pastime.

More diversity imported from the gays. Many killers in old studies were actually homosexual…. coincidence?

Hedonists are never ever satisfied, they’ll keep pushing the boundaries of alleged ‘kink’ until society shoots them or they die.

 eventually led to section 63 of the 2008 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, making it illegal to possess an extreme pornographic image which included acts that threaten a person’s life. However, the cases that have come to court have been ones involving bestiality or child abuse. “It’s not used for scenes of violence, strangulation and rape, which is what was intended,” says Edwards.

A person who wants to murder you does not want sex, they want to murder you. Put the magazines and porn sites up on charges too. That porn is basically a mid-cancelled snuff film.

 The sex game gone wrong was something the police or Crown Prosecution Service came up with, not the defence. “It felt that the police thought she had somehow asked for it,” says Sarah. “The ‘sex game gone wrong’ story was a way of blaming everyone and no one.” The sleeping man was found not guilty. Nothing was ever explained.

will this be the Clinton’s excuse? Andrew’s?

Mantrums are degenerate

Chris Morgan, ‘Bagel Boss Guy’: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

‘member when men had dignity? Me neither.

Lump this one in with the Speedos guys who insist they’re not gay; with fake tan, waxed chests and a neon budgy smuggler.

At least this height obsession would make sense if he had a lifelong goal like joining the Marines.

“Another video shows Morgan slamming his bagel down on the ground while continuing to have a tantrum, before eventually taking his breakfast order and leaving the store.”

That is one severely hijacked amygdala. Two fuse breaks in five minutes?


Just find a short woman, there’s plenty of ’em. Move to Thailand.

“Bagel Boss told the New York Post that the man didn’t pay for his breakfast — a whole wheat bagel with one egg white and swiss cheese — before leaving the store.”

With the pathetic pettiness we’ve come to expect from triggered Americans. He didn’t even pay and he ordered egg white? There are no nutrients in egg white. Is he gonna blame his hormones next?
This kind of hysteria is unacceptable, from men or women alike.

It’s literally the modern fainting couch, public outbursts of hulk rage over nothing.

“Morgan’s YouTube channel is filled with first-hand accounts, typically filmed from the perspective of Morgan, of other confrontations he has found himself in. In his most recent video posted to his channel, Morgan confronts two 7/11 workers, who he claimed asked him about his height instead of greeting him like a normal customer.”

He claimed? No proof? Funny that. He seems to live for this stuff, which is hardly enviable.
Probably one of those guys who gets high bullying people. DARVO.
His claims meet the empirical criteria, going off on all women in a random shop.

Yes, cry, crybully. You walked into a shop and got ‘offended’.

Science, to the rescue!

https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/defineDARVO.html
“In a 2017 peer-reviewed open-access research study, Perpetrator Responses to Victim Confrontation: DARVO and Victim Self-Blame, Harsey, Zurbriggen, & Freyd reported that: “(1) DARVO was commonly used by individuals who were confronted; (2) women were more likely to be exposed to DARVO than men during confrontations; (3) the three components of DARVO were positively correlated, supporting the theoretical construction of DARVO; and (4) higher levels of exposure to DARVO during a confrontation were associated with increased perceptions of self-blame among the confronters. These results provide evidence for the existence of DARVO as a perpetrator strategy and establish a relationship between DARVO exposure and feelings of self-blame. Exploring DARVO aids in understanding how perpetrators are able to enforce victims’ silence through the mechanism of self-blame.”

“examined whether learning about DARVO could mitigate its effects on individuals’ perceptions of perpetrators and victims. DARVO-educated participants (compared with control) rated the perpetrator as less believable. While much more research is needed, these results suggest that DARVO is an effective strategy to discredit victims but that the power of the strategy can be mitigated by education.”

…like the “anti-racists” accusing everyone of racism while expressly moving to white countries to hate them.

Back to angry bagel man: (I think the term ‘manlet’ is cruel)
“Morgan reveals that he owns a cleaning company and that he is living in his car.”
He’s meeting the nomadic criteria for ASPD, at least.
“If I asked a girl how big her tits are, is that harassment?” Morgan asked the police officer trying to claim the two incidents are the same.’
Similar but not the same. Your height is not a sexualised thing. Height is not objectified. Fallacy of poor analogy.

‘Morgan pleaded with the police officers who arrived on the scene to do something, but the officer said there is nothing he can do over a “comment you don’t like.”’

Sorry, but I had to use that gif. Goes both ways, dunnit?

I’m getting strong SJW vibes from these guys – like fatties who don’t like to be told they’re fat, someone’s height, like their IQ, is numerical.

What he’s asking the officers to ‘enforce’ is Harrison Bergeron socialism, verbally then with impediments (so-called positive discrimination).

Censoring people from admitting biological difference won’t make them disappear.

“Morgan Continues His Reign of Confrontation, Filming Videos of Him Confronting Library Workers and People in a Bar”

Confrontation videos are left wing, it’s their victory lap for owning the legal system. Big Brother loves THEM.

“One of the workers insists that Morgan stops videotaping her as she threatens to get the police involved.”

Yeah, he gets off on this. Gamma or something else. Secret king vibes.

“The woman whom Morgan is videotaping claimed that her rights were being violated because she doesn’t want to be videotaped, but ultimately nothing comes of the situation besides another example of why Chris Morgan is the king of confrontation.”

In many places, situations and jurisdictions you can’t film, actually, (the uses of footage are also limited, no profit for instance) and I know that was a sneering reference to gammas, clever.
These guys have zero self-awareness (and possibly less empathy).

“In another video titled, “Fat f*ck at Grizzlies Bar in Bay Shore,” Morgan continues his documentation of height-fueled diatribes as he confronts a larger man in Jets jersey as he hurls obscenities towards the man who Morgan claims did him wrong.
“Ragging on my height all day, you fat f*ck,” Morgan yelled across the bar as the video begins. “All you girls for the big bullies.”

I figured this was just one incident, like a sane person would, until I looked into it but this guy’s obviously a serial bully (they go after both sexes but prefer one) and, from the bagel video, isn’t he rather curvy on the belly himself? He looked second trimester but it could’ve been the camera angle.
People in glass houses….

I wonder if he was this bitter and triggered before the divorce.

Does he think alpha = triggered?

Even a minor case of nagging men would be stressful enough to deal with. Narcissists test everything, though. They have predictable loops of ‘confrontation’ trying to get attention. When you know how they work (see Castalia House’s published works) it’s almost funny if it weren’t abusive to innocent bystanders.

“They don’t have a job, or a job as good as mine. They don’t have a car. They are more overweight… and they are judging ME?”
You can taste the entitlement. If he won’t accept his level, he can’t ignore the consequences of not accepting his level.
And for the millionth time, only gold diggers care about your job.

“he is considering pressing charges against the man who tackled him.” You told him to.

“After his divorce in 2007, Morgan seemed to hold onto a disdain towards women and men who are larger than him.”

So he is bitter about being a bachelor.
Okay, so?

It’s been twelve years. WTF.

Why is that meant to be the world’s problem? Cope. Get a therapist. Hell, get Peterson.

And that’s true clinical misanthropy, not just misogyny. Misanthropy clinically = ASPD.

Get leg lengthening surgery if it’s really height (it isn’t, pure cope for the personality).

“That’s why I have resentment towards women. I find them all to be stupid, gold-digging liars.”

…If they don’t want you when you make more money, how can they possibly be gold diggers?
Narcissists always lie.
And ALL?
ALL?
Like, he can’t find a short woman on the planet.
I dunno, maybe it could be ….personality? Anger management is cheaper than a lawsuit, just sayin.

Angry people get addicted to it, neurochemically.

““I’m not stopping and the world is going to hear me. I want equality for everybody.””

Humans are never equal, we’re a species. There are many objective metrics on which we vary, ….height, for instance…

Atheist angry at God… again.

Is this why satyrs are short and angry at young women? Was it an ancient testimony to rage cope?

Could you imagine if this were a bitter, post-Wall divorced woman angry about being called fat?

It’s just a detail, don’t let it define you, bloody Hell.

180 response from the hypocrites, it would be. Imagine what this guy’s gonna be like when he gets older?

Literal psychopaths

Misogyny is a known trait in this type. If God is dead, this type of person killed Him.

The murderer lied about being her “boyfriend” too, these people belong in asylums.

We really do live in Satan’s realm.

Like, the murderer actually thought having any kind of vaguely sexual claim to her would make decapitation more okay. The idea that learning some cheap lines would ‘save’ such monsters is baseless and asking for the insanity to be turned on the silly men offering non-solutions.

Ironically, they complain about pretty women existing (online or just anyway) and then never question their own complicity in seeking them out. The degeneracy is an exchange – you perving over women for hours a day is on you. That is a choice. If ‘thots’ exist, it is only because you feed them.

Assuming there’s something evil about a woman for basically not being fat i.e. attractive, is utterly ridiculous. The atheist contempt for nature’s beauty continues. They actually think porn is real and women are like that. How long until this is connected to porn?

Sexual predators pretty much general criminals too

Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12616928

Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.

Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.

Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.

If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.

You’re probably a misogynist?

It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?

So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.

Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.

If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums. 

Impulse control is a choice.

Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.

My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.

Muh Dick is invalid.

r-types expose themselves

“It’s you, not me!”

spot the r-type is a fun game

slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil

first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage

next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog

lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever

muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills

When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.

“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil

Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.

Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.

 

Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

Common sense on leftpol, what the right needs

Never thought I’d see the day.

2,500 words.

This is a salt post. If you’re new, you might try to argue. This is cute.

You know the only reason the left has power over the young? The right refuses to discuss class issues.

They hand-wave the concerns of the poor, the realpolitik.

Because most of them are middle-class, like the chattering left, but rescind the ground out of supposed principle. The principle being cowardice. They’ll talk about race, sex, sexuality and so on like the left want them to. Never classism.

Huh.

As if everyone capitalist, whatever their job, is the fucking Monopoly man.

Check this privileged asshole. Poster boy of all men. And you let it happen.

Why do you think they still got a hate-on for Thatcher?

She knew, daughter of a grocer and didn’t ridicule the poor/proles for capitalist ambition.
She treated them like intelligent adults who wanted to work hard and do better.

This is surprisingly realistic on the obligations of gender and biological realities.

How is a woman supposed to simultaneously raise children (alone, so still bad for them) while earning a high-earning full-time wage sufficient for financial support of self plus dependents as well? Especially given how men have higher-paying roles in the first place, prior to conception? [motive or cause aside]

And were she to apply after being left with baby (punished and derided for trusting a weak man, my stars), what of the so-called motherhood penalty? The one that makes her a less attractive hire, first to fire (less time for corporate faux family drama, HR hates them) and less likely to get a promotion whatever the skill level? You’d have to be a total fool to think companies don’t factor all of this in. After childbearing, a woman’s work options ARE severely limited and her earning potential for herself is impaired, discussions of cause or blame aside. If capitalism had disabilities, that would be the biggest one. Whereas fathers can get more pay, more time off (covered by the single, unfairly) because it’s expected they aren’t the primary caregiver to their own child. I’d love to see studies on single fathers and earning potential but the SJWs won’t do them! Because then it isn’t about the women (and not even white women) but companies punishing responsible parents.

Child support or welfare, I wonder who should be held responsible for your loin meat.

Parental protections in occupational law are vital. States exist to make sure businesses don’t ruin the People and that includes dysgenic culling of the future population by active punishment of childbearing, the cultural risks to having kids are already high enough.

https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/9118a9ef-0771-4777-9c1f-8232fe70a45c/compendium—sans-appendix.pdf

And if men want to be primary caregiver, if they think it’s easy, I haven’t seen anything to suggest this damages the children if both parents are still a unit and supporting the child. That’s the business of the people in the marriage, not the State.

MRA types assume all women are upper-middle class with Daddy’s savings. Like the SJWs, that’s why both get so, so much wrong.
They’re out of touch.

The following inspired by

https://8ch.net/leftpol/res/120643.html#q126164

It’s hilarious that misogynists assume they’re on the right side of the bell curve a- when they can’t read it properly and b- they make basic bitch errors clear to anyone who can think three hypotheticals ahead. For example, assuming white women were the property (as has never actually happened, historically) of white men (their fathers or possibly brothers) then why would those relatives want the women mistreated? Why would they sell them like desert cowboys when all men even get emotionally attached to the wellbeing of their dogs? It just seems like rapists trying to justify their ‘consent’ hamstering with the notion it’s validated by the owner in a sales position… when white women would be the most valuable, globally, pricing them out of the market, were it to happen. Finally, the recent universal suffrage of men would be torn down and slavery or servitude to pay off debts brought back. Well, plenty of men have Fight Club style debts on car leases, carousing parties and Ikea branded cardboard. If your sole argument for enslavement is IQ, look at the bell curve, most of the low IQ are male and already work in those lower tier manual roles, causing little movement in the labour market. It could be argued they’re already enslaved now, by practical virtue of their low IQ. It isn’t like you’re freeing up jobs for men (who don’t want to do them) and infertile women (by age or nature) would also be forced to work like men so the office couldn’t possibly be a 100% Mad Men montage sausage fest. All the glamorous jobs would go to the highest IQ i.e. not you and the majority of works (busywork) would disappear, the thing about a minority of workers producing the most? Assuming you actually wanted meritocracy and the best man or woman for the role. Men wanted worker’s rights for a reason – they wanted it for themselves.
What do they expect to rest on, for those job roles, their winning personality? I mean, these idiots think it’s the worst of times for men. Fuck grand-daddy gored on barbed wire, his grand-daddy dying down the mines crushed by debris with black lung hindering any escape, his being pressganged and dying a slow painful death of syphilis – women not humouring your bullshit HURTS. These guys think the modern times oppress them when it actually keeps them alive (with the threat of nuclear war) to consider blogging a job and blame women for their weakness on an information hub they waste on porn addiction. Porn is the opiate of the idiot masses.
The Peter Pan immaturity that conflates taxes for labour and fun for “rights” to an imaginary Pleasure Island discussed on the internet to troll them.
Some HR harpy may pay taxes but do they work? Who’s paying for the abortion clinics these wannabe manwhores wanna fill up with their ‘stealthing’ bullshit? Where in the human rights law does it say other-caused orgasms?
They also imply homemakers aren’t workers, which is abject crap. Deadbeats tend to be male because they don’t want to put in the work raising a family, being a Patriarch so they dump the contractual obligation of their gender role after making the most expensive ‘mistake’ (actually investment) characteristic of mature adults i.e. making a child. They knew sex made babies and didn’t get a vasectomy beforehand. What hypoagency? Are women really responsible for your case of the wandering penis now?
If women couldn’t inherit despite longer life and their own earnings, property rights wouldn’t exist for over half the
population, not including low IQ men who’d likely be stripped too. So it’s a fundamentally classist thought experiment and screws over their fellow man the most. If suffrage were based on paying taxes, a sensible position, then all the libertarians and corporate men couldn’t vote for betraying the nation, even if they were billionaires. Again, a sensible position. Suffrage is inherently nationalist, look at how white women voted in droves for Trump to protect their families.

The enemy using a good system doesn’t make that system the enemy. Your ancestors died for that position, you think they didn’t have good experience of what happened without them?

Deadbeats are a ghetto concept, it’s rare for a white man to have such r-select inclinations but they try to normalise this. Show me deadbeat populations by race. It should be larping like a rapper or something.

What’s normal for other races in whatever continent shouldn’t be normalised or (god forbid) celebrated for white people.

All they have is ad hominem for the average woman, if you ask for citations of their Muh Studies and ‘logic’. If they had such an issue with whores they’d make actual prostitution (inc. hardcore porn) illegal. Yet they ignore all the realities they don’t like e.g. porn addiction/mental issues, bachelorhood/lifespan, divorce/male re-marriage, paternal age/literal autism, and call women the emotional snowflakes who hate science.

Why aren’t there more women on their team? Big mystery. Guess they’re jealous too.

And gatekeeping the right wing, philosophy of sexual cooperation, segregated by sex, is totally feasible.

But Emotional Intelligence isn’t real, guys. Apparently big-brained men can’t figure out, as a sex, how to do it, so it cannot be real. This is science. This isn’t just a bunch of autists complaining about empathy.

Let’s be clear, snowflaking isn’t sex-specific, it’s an IQ range. For one Trigglypuff there are a thousand guys ragequitting their keyboard because you like a different phone or think a certain car manufacturer is over-rated. At least Triggly had some higher bloody attempts at priorities.

Men stereotypically bicker about the most pointless of things and act like it’s so deep.

Are we supposed to pretend we don’t notice?

Bring back duelling and the gobby lefty will mysteriously go extinct. As will black crime gangs.

They’re allowed to box with gloves, that might kill them, but not fight for their principles under agreed rules?

They don’t even specify landmass, racial composition or national IQ average for their thought experiments.

If utopia were a graph, a couple are important legends. What are you controlling, what do you measure?

Libertarian cuck tier “errors”, like ignoring what’s happening with the billions of swarming parasites populating the rest of the world – and feeling entitled. Like pop! we magically get to a land of no history and genetic competition.

That’s only a thought experiment if you’re a moron.

Would only the sons and daughters of the rich be recognised as having natural rights they’re born with?

You know, like the right of kings?

But they won’t dare bring up eugenics, because that would lead to a discussion of declining male quality too. The old coots were right, we do need a good war… or smarter abortion/contraceptive efforts.

Caring for the fate of your group (i.e. its fitness because evolutionary competition exists) does not imply caring for the individual entitlement feelz of everyone IN said group, presently. The current generation is nuclear ashes as far as low time preference planning is concerned.

Hey, I promised salt. All women are brutal thinkers, we just can’t acceptably say it (unless you want people singing songs about witches when you die).

We’re all trying to come up with some grandiose plan (one by one, how smart) that replaces a monarch’s wisdom and even has a cultural tier replete with aristocrats (in a democracy, in all but name) – all without discussions of class, IQ, culture/quality…

and wonder why it doesn’t work?

Muh Social Darwinism from actively anti-natal genetic suicides is tragic and ironic and I love it. You don’t want your genes in the future but sure, you “care”… like the socialists who tax evade!

They’re actually taking advice on how to form a healthy family unit and Patriarchal masculinity – from gay guys!

No wonder women laugh at you, who’d respect someone who thinks THAT is a good idea?

Do you want a world where Oscar Wilde wannabes can fuck your brother and call it trad?

Assuming it’s genetic and you believe in evolution (big ask, I know), nature has culled those people from the gene pool for solid reasons. Let them paddle in the brown-tinged hot tub in peace.

The hidden bisexuals, however, are a threat.

How does a person go through this loop of circular irrationality a thousand times for various forums and never figure it out?

>women are selective, it’s just evolution, they can’t help it
>why don’t girls like me? must be their fault, women r dumb

You can’t rationalise your way out of evolution but they try.

Tier: Sexual selection.
Outcome: rejection.

>women shouldn’t be able to accuse men of rape, lol don’t believe women
>how did Rotherham happen? why did nobody believe them?

Literally protecting rapists (unless Muslim) and would probably claim rights to access a rape baby, over rights to a lead payment. Are they rapists? Are they enablers?

Why don’t women want them?

Rape is the only way they can reproduce. Your forefathers knew this and carried out the death penalty. No bros before hoes. It was missus before sissies.

Think of it in terms of property rights. If I grew drugs in your garden without your permission and tried to sell that land, keeping all the profits. Bastards are an illegitimate exchange. The baby was made with an egg that didn’t belong to you, in a growing machine that also did not legally belong to you. It’s theft of fertility.

Otherwise, I can drill for oil on their land. If consent doesn’t exist, drafting returns.

The reason they hate the Brahmin class, the typical Hipster Joe Goldbergs of the world running everything from a modern art gallery, is that they’re a decadent aristo class who usurped the role of the rightful inheritors by blood.

That’s your real problem, isn’t it?

Was leaving your racial kinfolk of the British Empire truly worth your precious melting pot?

Take a good, hard look.

Would this have happened if you’d stayed with your race over multiculturalism mark 1, the pre-European pilot test or at least installed a King? You slag off monarchy but there’s one benefit. Kings don’t care about getting people to vote for them.

Instead you have rule by aristo-acting Jews. You must be so proud.

The Muh Ashkenazi Verbal IQ thing is just cultural Stockholm Syndrome at this point.
Who owns academia, who does the tests, who excludes the majority of white people?

Jung’s critique of Freud for ‘Jewish Psychology’, Jews of any stripe are not the human prototype.

It’s gone from frogs in palaces to banker toadies. Huge difference, huh?

Especially from our perspective, watching from their sewer as we filter their Third World shit.

Look at national debt under the British Empire versus now and repeat after me: Land of the free!

It is possible to vote wrong. Your working class great-grandpa might’ve been a socialist for the ‘right reasons’ but that doesn’t make the consequences of the voted party’s actions any less severe. Now America is fast becoming Little China, look at new immigrant flows.

A lot of the people new to right-wing ideas are experiencing bastardizations, pollutions with leftist assumptions and this includes “history was just the same as now, but the present is totally different, new and only getting worse”.

I question.

Psyops?

We know they have research profiles. Why not?

Alongside “people are all the same and ignore HBD, all class differences are a social construct but the oppression of class is totally real when we, your betters, deign to officially notice it”.

Like, isn’t it ultimately class-privileged to work in journalism?

I wonder.

Some universalism in whites dates back to our ancient tribal history. Why treat close genetic kin like shit, that would fly against inclusive fitness? We wouldn’t have survived the Ice Age. Not to be confused with pathological altruism’s out-group universalism. The bad faith try to draw a false equivalence, trying to make it a thought-terminating cliche so you cannot discuss the first, drowned out by accusations of the second.

There are misogynists in power in America, that’s correct, they’re Jewish culturally who consider women the spawn of Lilith. Orthodox Jews are the most woman-hating group in the world, moreso than Muslims. Why else try to turn white women into actual whores? Then get white men to cheer it, like the presence of camera equipment (thanks Edison!) makes it less shameful? There is a class of misogynists running the ‘rape culture’ but hardly a white Patriarchy and they also prey on little white boys. Look at all the crimes swept under the rug dating back to Old Hollywood. Whites wanted Prohibition to reduce crime, and this actually worked, so what did the Jews do? Under-mine it. What vice precedes most degeneracy, please?

I digress.

You can’t discuss society without class, America, it’s the fundamental way power is used, abused and accumulated.

TLDR: America’s stubborn refusal to discuss class is why it’s a moral cesspool. 

The ultimate problem is very simple, in an increasingly high IQ-demanding civilization:

What does America do with its low IQ?

Most of those happen to be male, fuck your feelings.

Reddit’s hate-on for astrology

I haven’t spanked reddit in a while.

Loves: astronomy, Elon Musk, popular sci-fi books, telling you how smart he is.
Hates: using google, research, empirical studies, bigoted people who dare disagree with him, history books.

Reddit Greg’s Greatest Hits:

“Snowflake PTSDs aren’t real but my ADD is”,

“Essential oils are bad for you but smoking pot makes you smarter, as you can see”,

“There is no scientific benefit to being Christian, they’re all so angry, at least when I talk to them”,

“Morality doesn’t exist but I’m not a psychopath”,

“SJWs get offended by everything, that’s why I post every time they do something that upsets me”,

“We don’t need to study atheists like a separate group, just trust we’re superior to you”,

“Conservatives are literal Nazis, they aren’t even human”,

“I can’t keep my wife happy so monogamy is a social construct”,

“My multiple divorces were caused by feminism, I’m a great catch, a real…Nice Guy…”,

“Cheating is just biology… unless a woman does it… unless a woman does it with me…”,

“Women shouldn’t breastfeed in public, that’s disgusting. Lingerie ads are capitalism and fine around children”,

“Women trick men into asking them out, dating them, proposing to them and marrying them”,

“My next wife’s gonna be Asian, all women are lying whores”,

“I don’t have a haltlose personality disorder because I think I’m fine”,

“Porn is safe, I just need to strangle women to cum naturally“,

“I’m not gaslighting you, you’re crazy”,

“What does creepy even mean? I never creeped out myself therefore I cannot be creepy”,

“If you hate me, you must hate all men, I am logical because I am a man”,

“If a man lies about a woman’s sex life, it’s a joke and it doesn’t matter, get over it but if a woman lies about a man’s sex life she might as well murder him because it ruins his life and career and she has no heart”,

“MeToo is stupid, victims don’t matter, they’re probably faking but men get raped and nobody even CARES, where’s OUR movement?”,

“Single mothers are evil but deadbeats are flawless little angels, even when they murder their kids it wasn’t their fault, it’s feminism”,

“I don’t have anger issues, the world makes me angry”,

“I have tons of scientific evidence about this important social issue but if you dare ask ME for any references I won’t give them to you and call it obvious, it’s just obvious”,

“That doesn’t count as assault because it’s something I’ve done, that’s how laws work”,

“I am very self-aware and actually very deep, nobody has ever experienced the same problems as me in the entirety of human history and I’m entitled to get whatever I want as a reward…. social justice is cancer”,

“I don’t hate women, I just hate everything they say, do and are, lol”,

“I can tell which men are hot and how women think but I’m not gay”,

“Threatening rape is a joke, that’s why men do it to one another”,

“I want to have tons of promiscuous dangerous sex but I’m a gentleman who’ll treat a woman right,”

“Women expect Prince Charming is gonna rescue them, I just want a virgin with a religion I don’t share who’ll let me internally damage and degrade her”,

“Women are supposed to bleed that much, scar tissue isn’t real”,

“LOL what a cuck… except when I’m cucking my wife, totally different, that’s consensual humiliation, my consent”,

“Women are shallow – no fat chicks, no one taller than me or who makes more money”,

“My masculinity isn’t fragile, my WW2 vet grandfather would’ve spent thousands on e-books about it too!”,

“But masculinity is in danger because of feminism, not toxic though!”,

“Women should work and pay their equal way but magically stay at home and never leave, leaving the Man to make ALL the money, the way it should be – why do they ignore us?”,

“It is totally my business what is happening in happy marriages, this isn’t weird”,

“Hello discussion of uterine cancer. Equality is a myth but WHAT ABOUT MEN?”

“Men age like a fine wine, that’s why I’ve been taking risky testosterone supplements from the wise old age of 21”,

“Testosterone supplements make your dick work better, that’s why they’re $12 a jar!”,

“Testosterone makes black men more violent so all white men need to take more testosterone and be like Africa, famous Matriarchy”,

“Women are regressing but wanting to fuck random teenage girls the rest of my life is healthy, not a fetish”,

“Age 29, a woman’s ovaries poison her to death like a gremlin after midnight, a doctor friend told me”,

“Reddit isn’t a prison for people who’d make the world worse, they’d make the world better – if only they could quit the site”,

“Rape gangs don’t target boys so living under Sharia would be fine, it isn’t like they castrate the conquered”,

“What was the virgin wearing when she was raped?”,

“Men and women are different but women should be more like men… and less like men… but more like men… but not those men… “,

“Idiotic women blame the Patriarchy for rape, but I’m smarter, I blame feminism”,

“Abortion is evil but rape is normal, just get a gun and get arrested for having a gun, then get raped in prison!”,

“Men don’t have to defend women, women should defend themselves with their weaker biology because I’m a coward”,

“Abortion is evil but fathers are not responsible for the life they made, no matter how many times they fuck without protection”,

“Boys will be boys but muh male on male homicide rate, be sad”,

“Women vote Left, because the Left said so, and they wouldn’t lie about that”,

“”The Pill has made women whores, let’s keep it legal!”,

“What was the rich guy wearing when he was mugged?”, (I wish)

“Patriarchy is a good thing unless I have to earn money for my gender role.”

“A rich man who marries is asking to be divorce raped”, (that was pure troll)

“Women need to earn respect but men deserve respect for existing creating war, usury, genocide, rape, various crime statistics….”,

“Women are useless, that’s why mothers are so important to us, in the kitchen, keeping us alive”,

“Women are crazy but let’s hand them a set of steak knives and take a nap”,

“Men are geniuses, that’s why I can’t name a single living one from the past century”,

“My delusions of male grandeur say yes, the national IQ of Russia says no”,

“More men are alive than ever, that’s why the world is in such great shape, look at India!”,

“Celebrities are cancer but the cult of Musk is life”,

“War is coming to teach these women a lesson but no, I’m too ____ to be drafted”,

“Womyn is stupid, just say woman, what is wrong with females?”

“The death penalty is fine but child support is cruel”,

“I’m not a soy boy…. but soy sauce doesn’t count”,

“Women are gold diggers, I asked a woman to go out with me and she expected me to pay! She should be grateful I made the offer, I didn’t offer to pay too!”, (check this one)

“I deserve a good woman, whether they want me or not“,

“Promiscuity is good for men, look how well-adjusted manwhores are from middle age on”,

“Stupid Boomers are paying for their years of ‘free love’, glad that won’t happen to us!”,

“I don’t want to get married but have all the reliability and loyalty of a wife, because I’m me,”

“I don’t want to rape you but I insist on getting you so drunk you can’t fight back”,

“I’m avoiding all women, by spending every hour of every day bitching about them”,

“They’re calling him a rapist without a trial, but he doesn’t want a trial!”,

“It’s assumed she wants it until she presses charges”,

“Women are so stupid, that must be why they reject me and I want them”,

“Men can’t be beautiful so I can’t be ugly”,

“Fuck character, women want huge muscles because the guys at the gym said so”,

“We can study everything without censorship but looking into the life outcomes of slutty men might hurt their feelings”, (Hare did it)

“Old men are happier than old women, free, they even die earlier, ultimate MGTOW!”,

“What causes so many male suicides, we’ll never know! Smith & Wesson retirement plan FTW!”,

“Bachelors die sooner but that doesn’t make it unhealthy”,

“Deadbeats don’t harm their kids but girls get periods early”,

“Studies proving low IQ are real until you get to the political implications for low IQ white men, who don’t exist”,

“Communism is impossible to sustain but socialism is fine”,

“Marx was a man but all lefties are women”,

“Social science isn’t real but the mental disorders I claim to have online are valid”,

“I don’t believe in r/K because a pattern throughout species insults me personally”,

“There are obvious brain differences between left and right wing people, if only we had an evolutionary theory that tied this all together!”,

“Political persuasion works but I’m a materialist, everything about the mind, including consciousness, has a biological explanation”,

“My child IQ score allows me to sit on my ass all day judging others instead of contributing to society”

“My parents paid for this expensive education that clearly did wonders, that makes me right and you always wrong”,

and “Vaccines are safe, I had them and my autism is total coincidence. You should trust pharmaceutical companies even though you can’t sue them for vaccine damage but Big Pharma wants to kill us all, they want us all stupid. Drugs are bad unless I bought them from an illegal immigrant involved with child slave rings, then they’re good for you! Oh my non-existent God, don’t you know how bad smoking cigarettes is for your erections?”

I’m taking the piss out of everyone, if you can’t tell.