The Left mindset detests beauty

I want to comment on a comment left on VD’s blog.

I won’t link because it’s irrelevant.

“They hate you not because you are Christian but because you are white, they only hate Christianity because it is a proxy for traditional European culture.”

Every war is a race war. It’s all Darwin, all genetic, a selection pressure.
The Left’s only lasting principle is anti-white. This is unusual for its longevity when their signals change constantly to confuse us  and keep us reactive so we can’t intellectually mobilize.

The mindset of the left is the mindset of the serial killer whenever they see a pretty white women they want to torture and kill her.

Ed Gein was a tranny, btw.
“When I see a pretty girl…”
And despite the Oedipal issues in misogyny, nobody advocates returning to Freud.
Men need standards of honour and decency not blame and bitchiness.

They want to get rid of white men so all white women can be raped.

The fake right who think a brown man’s opinion is greater than any white woman….on the white homelands? Tempted to point out that’s cultural theft, outright.
When the West is undefended, it dies. If Western man is weak, woman falls prey. Sex is the reward of conquest, breeding.
Sexual divide and conquer is a cloak and dagger to ignore the racial element of ‘tension’ issues.
Multiculturalism is the enemy, men and women were fine while homogenous in their own homelands.
Remember that, they don’t want you to. Immigration is the Trojan horse. You can’t be raped by someone in another continent and Muslims use homosexual rape as a punishment too. I’ve mentioned this recently.

They want all pretty people castrated so that only the ugly can breed because they hate beauty and love ugliness. Cucking pretty people into adopting brown babies and supporting the third world is just their consolation prize. They would like all pretty people to have their faces mutilated for the sake of equality.”

Ah, Harrison Bergeron, so predictive of the politics of Cultural Marxist envy.
This was a comment floating the idea of white men converting to Islam en masse. 2 issues.
1. women wouldn’t follow. We’re not stupid. Jesus never needed to hit a woman when you hurt his feelings. That’s strength, in all mating preference studies for marriage, women prefer conscientiousness in men. Sadism is the polar pathological opposite. At best, they’d attract the crazy ones.
2. you can preach and quote without conversion, especially quoting the common opinions on Jews. This might be why older working-class factions like Corbyn are temporarily aligned with the Muslims.
It’s a countersignal to temporarily defang them, especially from splintering off into their own party and forming an Islamic Party of Great Britain, which would eat into Labour’s own voteshare. However, it pushes us further away from a return to national traditionalism, where true security and progress lies. Meanwhile, NRx has long discussions of what traditionalism is, but fine if you want to ignore it. What comes after your civil war? Vacuums need plans.
Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a war manual, to submit to supranational slavery. They’re worse than the Catholics ever were. The majority of Muslims would starve if the taxpayer stopped funding them, they’re leeches in the most literal fiscal sense. Without production, how do they take over? Well, enslavement. The Left are lazy and already parasitic as r-types, do you really think they’ll work harder for the Arab than the European? No, they won’t work at all. We destroy the Left by letting their chickens come home to roost, by encouraging squabbles and in-fighting. They have no loyalty to the host nation or one another, this will come to a head and the sooner the better. Concern trolling as one group to another. This works. Black ops is invisible to idiots.
All you need to do is cite the Talmud AND the Koran, there are plenty of online resources for passages, cite it with original, not dhimmi or gentile wording, and the Left cannot object to this without their favourite pet turning on them because the Left is entirely dis-united. This signal boosts the true face of these religions too. Anything that stops them pulling together strengthens us. Otherwise, demographics is a ticking time bomb. It needs to be kept as casual references, defanging the cultural and acadmic power of Cultural Marxists who think Islam is so secular and neoliberally progressive. Simply throw it in their face casually often enough and they’ll stop signalling it. I know how these people work so please listen to me. Tweeting passages to celebrities and using them casually in articles is the ultimate weapon. It doesn’t take them seriously because only the Left are stupid enough. It’s a glorious shitpost.

I’ve mentioned the technical apsects of signalling here many a time, if you take it seriously, the signalling value is NIL.

This also gives away the premise and paradigm to the enemy, to judge you on their metrics. You want to flip the sociological (social) script by questioning their premises but in such a way they feel ashamed to openly discuss those premises. You cannot be serious, that’s WHY the Left cannot meme! No sense of humour! Too serious!

They almost want you to use their memes, to embolden them as the only ones worth stealing. I know how they’d play this because I know how these people operate. I already know how they’ll break their own toys if you steal them – white privilege. It’s been set up this whole time, beginning with the original sin of white guilt. Instead you must oppose the r-selected behaviours. That is their Achille’s because according to them, all behaviour is a Tabula Rasa CHOICE.

R-types enable r-types. Do not enable them in rape, theft or murder. They want that. Never do what the enemy wants, reaction formation is sane when you’re acting in self-interest.

They detest any meme that calls them to demonstrate virtue, see “so much for the tolerant Left” which exposed their hatred and bloodlust for civilized culture. The Left always come out with their authoritarian face eventually and we need to speed this up. Let people see them for what they truly are. If we keep trying to out them, they bury deeper like societal termites. Let them in-fight and expose themselves. They oppose liberty, the intellectual freedom to dissent foremost. Workers must keep working – or else. Show them which hand holds the whip.

That is how status signalling works. You don’t walk up to someone and say “I’m rich”, you mention your holiday in the Alps. Don’t sperg all over the place and think you’ll change them and their Narrative. You’ll just vindicate Muslim positions when you should be vindicating Christian ones using Islam and Judaism so they dunno which one to start on without either sponsor turning like a rabid dog. Game theory, guys. We’re using their common tactic of triangulation against them, because they are naturally diverse, divided and we are not.

You can’t countersignal a countersignal (eugenic by dysgenic), you can’t satire a satire (the Alt Right’s success, see: Why mockery?) but you can signal something similar but different, to weaken the original one and strengthen your future ones. Think of it as ideological lubricant. We need to slide into a real war on terror with Crusades nice n’ easy.

The first move in chess has the most freedom but the second holds the strategic advantage since the opponent’s move is already set. To choose another game, we need only knock down their dominoes. They’ve arranged them opposing one another, it’s a flawless set-up IF ONLY you get them to swipe at one another, also giving us time to replace them culturally. This is why I am also NRx and see no contradiction with calling for a cultured aristocracy. It replaces the extant academic degenerate class of Cultural Marxism, which the Alt Right’s existence is dependent on. When CM is gone, the AR too shall disband, like soldiers after the war. To do what? Depends on your traditionalist vision of utopia.

The stage five clingers will just be shirkers power-tripping.

Do you want to save the West or call someone an n-word online?

TFW not red-pill according to newbies

My feelings are so hurt I’m gonna start a Youtube AND a Patreon!

http://meme-magic-agency.com/redpill/

There are clearly some BS questions in there.

A few are simply out-of-place PUA/MRA/MGTOW shit.

If you don’t want to roll back the Sexual Revolution of the 60s, you can’t roll back to any prior time period, Einsteins.

Like assuming Universal Suffrage is female-only (look up the actual laws), and the Alpha Bro question with no basis in statistics (the provider breeds, the genetic father remaining – father is a verb – increases fitness according to all known results, to start it’s called the Parental Investment Hypothesis). A ‘psychologist’ should know these things…..

Nothing about HBD or civic nationalism, for instance. It’s more of an Alt-Lite PUA list. You can’t own a concept like redpill. Reddit tried that. This is No True Redpill, trying to outgroup the people with the facts, the people who made this more than a few memes during election season. I have a special helicopter waiting just for you, red carpet for the self-proclaimed Alpha that doesn’t ‘believe’ in evolution.
Blaming the wimminz is what weak men do. It divides the two halves necessary for reproduction, the true purpose of feminism. Not shekels, that ‘genocide’ thing you mentioned…

17309647_193580121141068_377832536047522180_n

I’ve been using this tagline the best part of a decade so you can pry it from my cold dead fingers, you Tinder-loving gym fags. Not one traditionalist question or anything philosophical about how to structure a healthy society, so it’s all normie trying to signal edgy with zero productive ideas. Like critical theory for the right.

18268533_1354733824621330_5671789448836126303_n

You can’t outgroup the original founders, you Roosh-cucking degenerates.

But at least they called me Hitler.

17800007_1893017997654152_4251070920055965993_n

You won’t be a Party member of any Patriarchy without a family.

They’ll get bored when they realize the Alt Right won’t allow them to rest on their arses signalling on Twitter like an SJW. The AR is undergoing a purge of lightweights or else it’ll die and change form like a phoenix. You do have to get up and work for this, and give up all the deviance you’re addicted to. That’s the barrier to entry, not learning certain terms. If you refuse to marry, you don’t believe in marriage, you might as well be Milo. Your ‘sex life’ impresses no one.

But at least they called me Hitler, so you know I must be onto something.

Since when did autist mean factually correct?

Sluts on the morality of slutting:

manwhores

The first was Henry VIII.

I love how they’re going the way of NRx and trying to claim ‘official’ beliefs, like a doctrine of a religion. You don’t get to exclude people. You have no moral authority. You’re not running this show. Your MSM-baiting ‘gatherings’ involve the e-celeb cancer thinking it’s important. You’re as bad as Laci Green, you just come from the opposite claim, totally passively reacting to whatever the Left says, standing for nothing yourselves. Just anti-, opposing, spite.
Way to bury any ideology, formalize. Next these losers will get matching homoerotic hoodies to go with their Man-Gorilla book. What’s the size of a gorilla’s dick again? Tiny.

The people writing this shit are genetic suicides and atheists, their opinion is liberal trash.
Commie by behaviour. Look at dem birth rates… wait, that’s abortion from your ‘notches’. Proud papa. They were libertarian gamer trash porn addicts before Gamergate.

Meanwhile, you know they’re a degenerate slut trying to explain away all the party years (ongoing) by insulting people who score highly too. They’re still living it up in the Pussy Parade and expect an obedient wife to take on their STDs and cheating risk once they start losing more hair and getting fat.

R-types are defined by their selfish entitlement.
However, we know they’re incapable of monogamy so the joke’s on anyone dumb enough to ring it.

Still, better than 8values.

Layers reach nouveau irony

Credit: Respect women memes

I can see why, thot is being applied to any woman regardless of sluttiness.

The original rule is no SC dog filter selfies. That is fair. That is 100% pure thot.

What’s happened?

Including the ones who just choose to look pretty instead of fat. How’s that for shooting yourself in the foot as a sex? Especially the one cued by evolution to prize appearance. Sounds like a feminist black ops, tbh, if they had the brains to smear on a cracker.

You’re normalizing sluts. You’re making the Kardashians seem average.

You’re pushing girls to tumblr to complain about being called thots.

Don’t do tumblr, kids.

If it’s an insult ugly girls use to demean pretty girls, don’t use it on pretty girls who dindu nuffin, idiots.

It’s becoming like the male overuse of cuck. I blame myself.

Hatefacts to trigger

I use ‘fact’ with caution. One study doesn’t make a fact, but it’s something.

http://archive.is/LRe05
“Here are about 700 hatefacts (politically incorrect but true statements) on Islam, race, gender relations, ethnocentrism, diversity, and more. These facts and other commentary were originally posted on the @LibrarianofHate twitter account. This is by far the largest listing of politically incorrect facts to date, but it’s only a small sampling of everything out there. After all this research, I don’t believe hatefacts are meaningful or convincing, since they only have value as part of a larger narrative that makes sense of the world, but perhaps someone will find this list worthwhile. If you find an error, typo, or just want to call me an evil nazi KKK member, you’re out of luck.”

e.g. “All available studies find that non-European immigrants to Britain cost about $10 billion/year. Source: http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/briefings/fiscal-impact-immigration-uk#kp3

The gender section mostly attacks women but otherwise pretty fair where it covers both (aka the scientific standard).
“40% of women with more than 20 sex partners have an STD. Source: http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2003/pdf/Bookofcharts.pdf#page=19
How does that not apply to men unless they’re all lesbians?
Oh wait, I looked up the link and it’s the guy that ONLY studies women (on heterosexual sex?!) and then acts like it’s scientific. Yeah, check the links first before using, guys. Severe quality issue in places. The obvious question would be, which sluts (men) are infecting these sluts? And the sample is at least ten years old.
“All the charts and data in this report refer to sexually active women; girls and women who have never been sexually active are excluded.” ….So it doesn’t even study all women, of that age, in that country. #facepalm
But this other one doesn’t study male happiness in marriage either…
Reassessing the Link between Women’s Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Quality
https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/91/2/635/2235785/Reassessing-the-Link-between-Women-s-Premarital

Do they not care about men too? Or is it just hostility with a poor methodology?
It’s men doing the studies…. why aren’t they studying men? What kind of data are they hiding?
Like the promiscuity divorce risk….

Not one has the balls to look at it.

And they call themselves redpill.

Where’s the data, dude?

You can’t just ignore half the dataset. I’m so disappointed. I have nothing to talk about if there’s only half, on a topic predicated on the need to compare BOTH. Still, some of the immigration links are useful. They have decent methods.

A shrink on sexual harassment “can’t you take a compliment?”

It’s odd how men will admit women are sensitive about their appearance then continue to attack us on it.

Yeah, that’s bullying. Even in school, that is not flirting.

A delightful, common sense explanation.

In before autism;

If you DON’T ‘believe’ in sexual harassment – go to a gay bar on a Saturday.

See how long you last.

That is a woman’s life.

Men are lecherous pigs, regardless of sexuality. What does a lecherous woman look like? A man.

Since any reading this and disbelieving are cowards, simply ask every woman you know and care about (assuming any stuck around you) about their experiences. There are always experiences, regardless of ‘age’ and seeming ‘fuckability’. Don’t talk over them excusing it, just ask the question, shut up and listen.

Actually, 9/10 male rudeness is the inability to shut up and listen. There are studies.

OT Rape accusations imply guilt. A totally honest man needn’t fear them.

https://www.jeunesepayne.co.uk/single-post/2016/11/07/Sexual-Harassment-%E2%80%9CCan%E2%80%99t-you-take-a-compliment%E2%80%9D

“When someone shouts across the street at me “show us your cunt”, or even just wolf-whistles, it’s not because they think it’s going to make me feel good.

It’s a reminder that they could overpower and attack you. R-types don’t care for rule of law, Ks are respectful (either ignoring you in public or getting introductions the decent way).
I saw a very right-wing blog post an article about how the author could easily rape any woman he likes.
In quite graphic detail and practically frothing at the prospect. I don’t read that blog anymore.
This was supposed to scare us all straight (and into agreement with him).

Rape isn’t funny to women, it appalls us (ESPECIALLY the conservative ones), it’s worse than murder. Imagine getting castrated, male power stripped and stolen. Rape is worse for women, at the very least for the conception aspect. A man joking about rape is an r-type trying to pass for K (strong). Those are the worst.

When women see a man seriously laugh (not from shock, but enjoyment) at domestic abuse or whatever sexual ‘prank’ is going on, it would be like watching a woman laughing at a man gored on barbed wire in WW1. Our thought is always the same: what if that were me?

This is why women choose compassion in mate selection studies.

Which sex has the blacker humour?

“Can’t you take a joke?”

Is civilization a joke? They make me wonder.

This is why the right wing’s reputation suffers. Manwhores cosplaying Patriarchy. They seem to think it means concubines and slavery, rather than monogamy and industry.

As for the genuine conservatives…

If they can’t fuck it or kill it, they’re probably going to insult it.

It’s not a well-intended or genuine interaction. They’re not even under some misguided impression that such comments will make me want to have sex with them.

Some are truly that stupid.

Thought process as follows:

If I make her hate me, it’ll remind her of my mother/her father.

Presuming all fathers are incompetent (r-selected) as his. Another layer of insult.

Resent women? No! I simply happen to crush and abandon them all by sheer coincidence!
Distrust women? Sure! They made me leave them! Projection’s only real when women do it!

It’s simply an exertion of power. The aim is to get approval or laughter from others, and discomfort or gratitude from me.

That is better known as sadism.

It is caused by degenerate media, especially the supernormal stimuli of HD streaming online porn.
I guarantee you 100% of those males are porn addicts, the female leches too. The testosterone has to go somewhere, they lack the impulse control (hypofrontality) and time preference to do something good with it.

A compliment is something you would feel comfortable giving a man, woman, or child because you believe it would make them feel good. You’re not boosting anyone’s self-esteem by reminding them that, by society’s standards, “you look acceptable enough for me to fuck”.”

There is always the insult that your primary value is whether they’d use you as their whore.

They’re calling you a whore.

That’s what no woman will admit.

You’re soliciting women on the street. As a whore. But at least whores can charge.

They refuse to accept they’re being rude but they wouldn’t say it if children were present. They desperately want attention but project this onto the provocateur (and looking good isn’t an excuse for anything, is it?) although differing tastes apply, so you can’t even hide your attractiveness since they’ll always be someone Into That. [cough pervert cough]
In conclusion, blame porn. Speaking to people like that (a whore) might not even be acceptable in a purely sexual, private interaction. If they’re smart, they’d leave immediately. It’s demeaning, dehumanizing and morally bankrupt, like the source.

Provocateur is a word I use deliberately… it’s never applied to men, is it?
There’s no such thing as Adam Teasing and Taharrush ‘games’ go after… which sex?

Misandrist women avoid men but misogynistic men seek out women.

Hello, the bulk of MGTOW.

They seek women out to punish them [1]  for what is perceived (projection) as the other’s wrongdoing. It’s never them, never examine the self!!!

Sexual predators, sexual sadism.

I guess womb envy comes into it somewhere but mention that after they play the feminist ‘Penis Envy’ record for the millionth time and suddenly the concept might be shaky? [SJWs lie, r-types lie, logic is a lie to them, thinking is K]

1 Who are you? You can’t lose the chub and get a good job, get out of anyone’s face. At least join a church or Greeenpeace or something. A useful Crusade.

I know, I know.

“Yes, but –

What about men?”

…What about the men?

Where are the men when this happens? [2]

Women exist, women are the fair sex. Women will be sexually harassed as long as we live. Men need to police other men, we certainly can’t.

Think too of the racial and class angles.

Is this acceptable as a way to treat people in the first world?

2

Sign of an r-type male: when you defend a woman from attack (and attack it is), you get accused of White Knighting. Yes, but White Knights are a good thing (Ks) and protect other Ks from monsters…

They never speak to men that way, knowing the odds of an altercation. Cowards to boot. Sexual competition makes the rabbit flee. At times, they’ll use the term incorrectly (in defense of another r) as a compliment of her sexual quality (lie) to get her into bed. It uses triangulation, the common manipulation tactic. Are those men crazy? Probably male borderline, it’s under-diagnosed. It would explain their romantic or intimacy issues that can be masked socially to some extent. R-types fear intimacy because it leads to responsibility and commitment, turn-offs. R/K does neatly align with attachment conditions (anxious-avoidant, secure)…. with the Mother (Freud wins).

Another sign “why are women so easily offended?” [3]

Only the ones around you.

Hm.

Yes, it’s definitely us…

all three billion of us, currently. And they say women can’t do maths?

3

Prelude to gaslighting, All women are crazy bullshit. Pathologizing a problem makes it go away!

See also the classic “why won’t women-” do whatever Lord Fauntleroy wants?

Narcissistic entitlement brewing up to rage. Histrionic, effete rage.

“Women used to be ladies”

The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.

TLDR; read bolded.

It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).

Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.

Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.

“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”

It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.

Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.


Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.


Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?

Especially those in other time periods.

^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.

Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.

In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.

Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.

This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?

Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.

Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.

Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.

The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.

Everything you know is wrong.

Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.

Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!

Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Casual or modest, pick ONE.

I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.

This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!

He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?

The problem is male demand.

Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.

You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.

You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.

Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?

More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.

Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?

Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…

Which fork, Forney?

They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.

Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.

The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.

This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.

These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?

Are you quite sure?

They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.

Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.

Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.

However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.

Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.

You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.

Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.

Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.

I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?

Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.

Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.

Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.

We mock idiots like you.

Comics: Misogyny and the double standard

To answer the 21st Century question Why don’t women try anymore?

without any reference to the dwindling quality of men.

I tag ‘homophobia’ because this is an accurate depiction of the real, older definition, which requires you be slightly homosexual but in denial about it. Not to be confused with the scientific, older definition which is also homoaversion. Otherwise, the same men laughing when feminists go on about ‘stare rape’ wouldn’t give a damn who looks at them, because there’s no chance of sex, so why care?

It’s strange to hear men say lewd comments aren’t insults but then ask them about their own history being bullied and suddenly words are important. Lewd people are rude expressly because they want to get negative attention and make the other person uncomfortable, and that, is bullying.

Protip for the socially inept: say nothing to do with the body per se. E.g. ‘nice dress’ is fine, ‘nice tits’ is obscene. ‘Pretty face’ is OK, ‘sit on my face’ is not, ever. Nothing you would hear in porn. It makes non-porn stars reach for the pepper spray. Women have to be paid to pretend to enjoy that. Think about it.

It’s our verbal IQ and it’s higher than you i.e. we hear more in your words than you put there on purpose. Yes, while nice dress may be a sneaky way to compliment bustline – we know this. It’s about respect as a human, not as a woman per se. If you treat someone as a reduced category, you are literally demeaning them for likely little purpose. Yes, this applies to men, because men is a category below human, the whole species. You can notice this in the hackles that come up when I type ‘Men are…’. It’s mean and rude and usually pointless. If they can’t help it, why mention it? If they can help it, just tell them the positive thing to do instead. If you don’t want them to correct it, you have no cause to gripe, per se.

I use per se too much, per se. It is unhelpful…. per se.

To every man who questions this reasoning, start complimenting the femininity of his features, especially if he has a fine bosom, and when he gets offended, tell him he should take it as a compliment.

By their logic, if another man tells them they have a tight, nice, firm backside, they have no right to be offended or feel creeped out or forbid, in DANGER, because rape is never preluded by taunting the victim, right? I mean, who’d get off on that, some sort of sexual predator? Also, it was your fault for wearing jeans, they’re too tight.

The system is rigged. The system is un-fair. You cannot win.
Why don’t women try anymore?

The only way to win is not to play.

We don’t tend to play into male power-trip fantasies [1] anymore because the whole system is against everyone, including women, and things like MGTOW are the ragequit from ‘why don’t they…’, ‘why won’t they….’ questions. Answer? People have agency. Men, women, leave them be. It’s called respect for human dignity. That’s why they’re almost perma-single and can’t keep any woman long enough for the narcissism to pop up like oral herpes.

1 Fantasies rigged by richer men, in suits. The greatest enemy of mankind is man himself. Yet they sit around navel-gazing about hemlines like the Fashion Police and wonder why women won’t touch them.

Re the clothes themselves e.g. she’s showing too much skin/asking for it, conformity is a female virtue.