Using humans as breeding machines is pure evil.
It’s discussed in the comments, not at the top.
a main purpose of trafficking is to steal white DNA, mostly skin, but especially lighter eyes and hair
it’s a primary purpose of slavery
Surrogacy is a women’s rights issue, and not a human rights issue for homosexual men. This view removes women from the centre of the debate, reframing male entitlement to women’s reproductive function as a pitiable cause to elicit sympathy from would-be progressives.
rumour has it cults like the Mormons are deliberately producing children to be trafficked
as young as babies
and then there’s the Cinderella effect with child abuse, the probability of gay parents abusing “their” kids (as stories are coming out of pedo parents) and the misogynistic entitlement as if Darwin didn’t already select you out of the gene pool
r-strategists’ sense of entitlement never ends
so all the tradlarpers saying they’re okay with gays, like it’s harmless, tell us you’re okay with letting them rape your sister (“natural conception”)
go ahead, go full Swede
because that’s on the table now
but cucking to Muslims is wrong, huh?
But, perhaps to obscure this reality, the language of the CPSA went to great lengths to erase biological sex. A significant number of edits were made by Democratic lawmakers wherein “mother” was crossed out and replaced with “gestational carrier,” or “person who gave birth.” Such terminology explicitly mirrors the way conservative anti-choice advocates view women, referring to women as “host bodies,” for example.
those guys aren’t conservatives, they’re Satanists
Christian men have a duty to protect women from evil men
Similarly, many instances of the term “woman,” “man,” and “paternity” have been removed and replaced:
know the Satanists by their fruit – abuse girls and women, dehumanise both
and this isn’t white men, if you look into it
farming half-white children
that’s their utopia of white genocide
no white men necessary, so death of their line too, indirectly
In this case, “gestational carrier” is used to refer to the woman whose body is being used to gestate a fertilized embryo that does not carry her DNA, though “handmaid” might be a more appropriate term.
human farming, like “surrogacy” farms in India
they want to legally be able to force women to birth children for them, or something something ‘discrimination’
this flies in the face of the Bible prohibition on rape (Death Penalty), respect for women (god’s children) and sexual selection, whereby women keep many of the crazier genes (spiteful mutants) out of the pool with the ‘creeps’ (real reason IVF m-m ‘couples’ cannot find a willing woman)
it’s a direct attack on the nuclear family
This is especially troubling given that there are no official records kept regarding how many women die in the surrogacy industry. In January, Michelle Reaves died due to complications from a surrogacy birth. Reaves succumbed to a condition known as an amniotic fluid embolism. According to a statement from the Center for Bioethics and Culture (CBC):
(how) are no records kept
“Recent studies have shown that surrogate pregnancies are different and are high-risk. Studies show that women pregnant with donor eggs (as in gestational surrogacy) have a more than three-fold risk of developing pregnancy induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia.”
except white women are human (obviously), the future of the extreme global minority race and already huge victims of trafficking for that breeding sow purpose (usually by Arabs), have been for centuries
giving birth kills women every year, it’s on par with major surgery and the bodily changes/birth can be traumatic
this is like sexual pressganging with a side of rape
even egg donation confers risks of developing endometriosis, infertility, or the fatal condition of OHSS.
but women are not fish, you can’t steal our eggs and expect us to be fine
forcing anyone to carry alone would be traumatising, I don’t see men queuing up to get a womb transplanted because it messes with your head, women hate being pregnant and that’s when it’s their husbands’!
the concept of being entitled to reproduce is exclusively heterosexual in the exclusive mutual agreement of a marriage
the document you’re looking for is a marriage certificate, nothing less gives you reproduction rights over another human. Nobody is entitled to have children and the people who disagree are narcissists, who should be legally banned.
I wonder if they’re trying to normalise this human rights abuse before the pedo stuff comes out
I think we’re starting to see why patriarchy both protects its daughters and hates homosexual men.
It’s still little known that most rapists are practically bisexual (“pan” if you believe in that). They tend to go after women because of the physical weakness of women, not a preference. Look at places like Afghanistan where they overpower little boys and goats.
A wife does not have the right over her own body, but her husband does. In the same way, a husband does not have the right over his own body, but his wife does.
And a man’s reproduction choices are the jurisdiction of his wife, not him. It isn’t one way, it’s equal yoking.
r-types never stop sinking to new lows, including the tranny parent pushers
they believe they own their children and ruthlessly control their life, even going so far as to buy them by force (madwomen like Jolie do this too, it would be false to assume her adoptions were all legal)
there was another CDAN blind about Jolie forcing her kids to write sexual fantasies in a journal and give it back to her everyday
these people are insane
insanity looks fine until you talk to it
like the guy who says he’s proud to be gay but feels entitled to rape your niece’s teen womb
rapists are evolutionally after reproduction so it’s rape in multiple senses of the word
A few years ago there were a couple separate cases of couples, one gay and one hetero suing ivf clinics because the kids came out a different race and so was obviously not related to them. I’ve often wondered how common these mix ups are. I bet a lot of times they remain undiscovered because the kid has the same ethnicity as the bio parent so no one guesses.
no that’s deliberate
genocide, only white couples get “mixed up”
who owns the IVF companies (Israel)