A shrink on sexual harassment “can’t you take a compliment?”

It’s odd how men will admit women are sensitive about their appearance then continue to attack us on it.

Yeah, that’s bullying. Even in school, that is not flirting.

A delightful, common sense explanation.

In before autism;

If you DON’T ‘believe’ in sexual harassment – go to a gay bar on a Saturday.

See how long you last.

That is a woman’s life.

Men are lecherous pigs, regardless of sexuality. What does a lecherous woman look like? A man.

Since any reading this and disbelieving are cowards, simply ask every woman you know and care about (assuming any stuck around you) about their experiences. There are always experiences, regardless of ‘age’ and seeming ‘fuckability’. Don’t talk over them excusing it, just ask the question, shut up and listen.

Actually, 9/10 male rudeness is the inability to shut up and listen. There are studies.

OT Rape accusations imply guilt. A totally honest man needn’t fear them.

https://www.jeunesepayne.co.uk/single-post/2016/11/07/Sexual-Harassment-%E2%80%9CCan%E2%80%99t-you-take-a-compliment%E2%80%9D

“When someone shouts across the street at me “show us your cunt”, or even just wolf-whistles, it’s not because they think it’s going to make me feel good.

It’s a reminder that they could overpower and attack you. R-types don’t care for rule of law, Ks are respectful (either ignoring you in public or getting introductions the decent way).
I saw a very right-wing blog post an article about how the author could easily rape any woman he likes.
In quite graphic detail and practically frothing at the prospect. I don’t read that blog anymore.
This was supposed to scare us all straight (and into agreement with him).

Rape isn’t funny to women, it appalls us (ESPECIALLY the conservative ones), it’s worse than murder. Imagine getting castrated, male power stripped and stolen. Rape is worse for women, at the very least for the conception aspect. A man joking about rape is an r-type trying to pass for K (strong). Those are the worst.

When women see a man seriously laugh (not from shock, but enjoyment) at domestic abuse or whatever sexual ‘prank’ is going on, it would be like watching a woman laughing at a man gored on barbed wire in WW1. Our thought is always the same: what if that were me?

This is why women choose compassion in mate selection studies.

Which sex has the blacker humour?

“Can’t you take a joke?”

Is civilization a joke? They make me wonder.

This is why the right wing’s reputation suffers. Manwhores cosplaying Patriarchy. They seem to think it means concubines and slavery, rather than monogamy and industry.

As for the genuine conservatives…

If they can’t fuck it or kill it, they’re probably going to insult it.

It’s not a well-intended or genuine interaction. They’re not even under some misguided impression that such comments will make me want to have sex with them.

Some are truly that stupid.

Thought process as follows:

If I make her hate me, it’ll remind her of my mother/her father.

Presuming all fathers are incompetent (r-selected) as his. Another layer of insult.

Resent women? No! I simply happen to crush and abandon them all by sheer coincidence!
Distrust women? Sure! They made me leave them! Projection’s only real when women do it!

It’s simply an exertion of power. The aim is to get approval or laughter from others, and discomfort or gratitude from me.

That is better known as sadism.

It is caused by degenerate media, especially the supernormal stimuli of HD streaming online porn.
I guarantee you 100% of those males are porn addicts, the female leches too. The testosterone has to go somewhere, they lack the impulse control (hypofrontality) and time preference to do something good with it.

A compliment is something you would feel comfortable giving a man, woman, or child because you believe it would make them feel good. You’re not boosting anyone’s self-esteem by reminding them that, by society’s standards, “you look acceptable enough for me to fuck”.”

There is always the insult that your primary value is whether they’d use you as their whore.

They’re calling you a whore.

That’s what no woman will admit.

You’re soliciting women on the street. As a whore. But at least whores can charge.

They refuse to accept they’re being rude but they wouldn’t say it if children were present. They desperately want attention but project this onto the provocateur (and looking good isn’t an excuse for anything, is it?) although differing tastes apply, so you can’t even hide your attractiveness since they’ll always be someone Into That. [cough pervert cough]
In conclusion, blame porn. Speaking to people like that (a whore) might not even be acceptable in a purely sexual, private interaction. If they’re smart, they’d leave immediately. It’s demeaning, dehumanizing and morally bankrupt, like the source.

Provocateur is a word I use deliberately… it’s never applied to men, is it?
There’s no such thing as Adam Teasing and Taharrush ‘games’ go after… which sex?

Misandrist women avoid men but misogynistic men seek out women.

Hello, the bulk of MGTOW.

They seek women out to punish them [1]  for what is perceived (projection) as the other’s wrongdoing. It’s never them, never examine the self!!!

Sexual predators, sexual sadism.

I guess womb envy comes into it somewhere but mention that after they play the feminist ‘Penis Envy’ record for the millionth time and suddenly the concept might be shaky? [SJWs lie, r-types lie, logic is a lie to them, thinking is K]

1 Who are you? You can’t lose the chub and get a good job, get out of anyone’s face. At least join a church or Greeenpeace or something. A useful Crusade.

I know, I know.

“Yes, but –

What about men?”

…What about the men?

Where are the men when this happens? [2]

Women exist, women are the fair sex. Women will be sexually harassed as long as we live. Men need to police other men, we certainly can’t.

Think too of the racial and class angles.

Is this acceptable as a way to treat people in the first world?

2

Sign of an r-type male: when you defend a woman from attack (and attack it is), you get accused of White Knighting. Yes, but White Knights are a good thing (Ks) and protect other Ks from monsters…

They never speak to men that way, knowing the odds of an altercation. Cowards to boot. Sexual competition makes the rabbit flee. At times, they’ll use the term incorrectly (in defense of another r) as a compliment of her sexual quality (lie) to get her into bed. It uses triangulation, the common manipulation tactic. Are those men crazy? Probably male borderline, it’s under-diagnosed. It would explain their romantic or intimacy issues that can be masked socially to some extent. R-types fear intimacy because it leads to responsibility and commitment, turn-offs. R/K does neatly align with attachment conditions (anxious-avoidant, secure)…. with the Mother (Freud wins).

Another sign “why are women so easily offended?” [3]

Only the ones around you.

Hm.

Yes, it’s definitely us…

all three billion of us, currently. And they say women can’t do maths?

3

Prelude to gaslighting, All women are crazy bullshit. Pathologizing a problem makes it go away!

See also the classic “why won’t women-” do whatever Lord Fauntleroy wants?

Narcissistic entitlement brewing up to rage. Histrionic, effete rage.

“Women used to be ladies”

The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.

TLDR; read bolded.

It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).

Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.

Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.

“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”

It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.

Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.


Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.


Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?

Especially those in other time periods.

^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.

Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.

In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.

Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.

This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?

Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.

Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.

Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.

The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.

Everything you know is wrong.

Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.

Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!

Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Casual or modest, pick ONE.

I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.

This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!

He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?

The problem is male demand.

Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.

You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.

You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.

Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?

More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.

Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?

Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…

Which fork, Forney?

They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.

Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.

The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.

This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.

These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?

Are you quite sure?

They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.

Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.

Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.

However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.

Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.

You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.

Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.

Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.

I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?

Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.

Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.

Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.

We mock idiots like you.

Comics: Misogyny and the double standard

To answer the 21st Century question Why don’t women try anymore?

without any reference to the dwindling quality of men.

I tag ‘homophobia’ because this is an accurate depiction of the real, older definition, which requires you be slightly homosexual but in denial about it. Not to be confused with the scientific, older definition which is also homoaversion. Otherwise, the same men laughing when feminists go on about ‘stare rape’ wouldn’t give a damn who looks at them, because there’s no chance of sex, so why care?

It’s strange to hear men say lewd comments aren’t insults but then ask them about their own history being bullied and suddenly words are important. Lewd people are rude expressly because they want to get negative attention and make the other person uncomfortable, and that, is bullying.

Protip for the socially inept: say nothing to do with the body per se. E.g. ‘nice dress’ is fine, ‘nice tits’ is obscene. ‘Pretty face’ is OK, ‘sit on my face’ is not, ever. Nothing you would hear in porn. It makes non-porn stars reach for the pepper spray. Women have to be paid to pretend to enjoy that. Think about it.

It’s our verbal IQ and it’s higher than you i.e. we hear more in your words than you put there on purpose. Yes, while nice dress may be a sneaky way to compliment bustline – we know this. It’s about respect as a human, not as a woman per se. If you treat someone as a reduced category, you are literally demeaning them for likely little purpose. Yes, this applies to men, because men is a category below human, the whole species. You can notice this in the hackles that come up when I type ‘Men are…’. It’s mean and rude and usually pointless. If they can’t help it, why mention it? If they can help it, just tell them the positive thing to do instead. If you don’t want them to correct it, you have no cause to gripe, per se.

I use per se too much, per se. It is unhelpful…. per se.

To every man who questions this reasoning, start complimenting the femininity of his features, especially if he has a fine bosom, and when he gets offended, tell him he should take it as a compliment.

By their logic, if another man tells them they have a tight, nice, firm backside, they have no right to be offended or feel creeped out or forbid, in DANGER, because rape is never preluded by taunting the victim, right? I mean, who’d get off on that, some sort of sexual predator? Also, it was your fault for wearing jeans, they’re too tight.

The system is rigged. The system is un-fair. You cannot win.
Why don’t women try anymore?

The only way to win is not to play.

We don’t tend to play into male power-trip fantasies [1] anymore because the whole system is against everyone, including women, and things like MGTOW are the ragequit from ‘why don’t they…’, ‘why won’t they….’ questions. Answer? People have agency. Men, women, leave them be. It’s called respect for human dignity. That’s why they’re almost perma-single and can’t keep any woman long enough for the narcissism to pop up like oral herpes.

1 Fantasies rigged by richer men, in suits. The greatest enemy of mankind is man himself. Yet they sit around navel-gazing about hemlines like the Fashion Police and wonder why women won’t touch them.

Re the clothes themselves e.g. she’s showing too much skin/asking for it, conformity is a female virtue.

Roosh is trying to outgroup r-types

Grasping at relevance, huh?

I’m not gonna link since that’d be throwing money at it.

Instead

https://poseidonawoke.wordpress.com/2017/03/10/on-rooshs-moderate-half-measure

Here’s the comment I made, which sums it up nicely.

Actually women have been the sex voting more rightward in Europe and recent trends in voting have made women swing conservative in general (over men) but Roosh has never let facts intrude on a piece of ‘satire’. Just look at recent elections and referenda, and still he …blames women, a majority of the population with enough numbers to swing it. American women are not typical of the world’s supply and Europeans are sick of reading that particular lie. Essentially, he’s arguing to strip low-commitment, low-loyalty r-types of the right to vote, without naming the r-type (because he is one). We used to do that with property requirements, since r-types are nomadic and property taxes were the only taxes (so you vote for where your money goes or don’t vote). That was not equal, but fair. Also, it wasn’t ‘women’s suffrage’ but universal, women’s suffrage is a feminist myth. Learning history is hard when male power-trip fantasy is so much more alluring than looking at the demographics data of recent elections.

I forgot to mention Millennial women are more conservative than their living predecessors.

And Gen Z are heavily conservative too.

Facts are hard when you’re a degenerate liar.

From here on out it’s an explanation of the r-psychology, with Roosh as Exhibit Gay. [this definition] It’s bitchy to match their level since, if you’re going to attack people randomly, expect them to get defensive.

A little on Europe.

The First World is the only place its values exist in the universe, we developed these with major wars, some civil wars and major historical reformations and enlightenments. We earned this way of life. These people, historical enemies, stepped into our house (without invitations) and took all the goodies paid for with our ancestor’s blood. They expect to get more than they give and skip the country whenever they like, owing us nothing. They’re already on thin ice with their treatment of our too-kind Christian hospitality (from pathological altruism, still finite ). Anyone questions these fundamentals and we come down on them like a ton of bricks. This is OURS, get bent. They totally deserve that rejection for rejecting what makes us, Us, and therefore worthy of their pillaging, because if they want to sample Non-First World living, go ahead. Good riddance. Except those people are narcissists and can’t stand to think of the First World being happy. They’re toxic civilization-breakers. Fifth columnists, saboteurs and snitches.

Like we’re all too dumb to notice the past and present runnings of our native countries. All hundreds of millions of us in civilized Europe. And yes, we need the advice of foreign mystery meat! Because white men in Europe are incompetent, right Roosh?

Everything about Europe was shit until you got here!! For millennia we have struggled! Thank the gods you’ve finally arrived! You’ve been so good for the people of every nation you’ve ‘banged’!

Common sense would argue:

If some people are unworthy of First World rights, simply deport them to where they belong.

Not all countries or its genetic Volk can uphold the glories of First World liberty. OK. Not everyone can be smart enough or capable enough to run things to the highest known standard.

Everyone will be better off! Everyone will be happier! We’ll stop trying to turn a cat into a dog by putting a leash on it and truly embrace cultural diversity! …except the narcissists. Who are only happy when this applies: misery loves company. Basically, never take a narcissist’s advice on the Good Thing To Do. They lack the empathy. Relational narcissism is a thing.

Which country is the Sodom of our times? The one we should take as a negative case study? The one who started this Melting Pot shit? The one obsessed with materialism, gangster culture and money?

America is the paragon of patriarchal virtues! Let’s all listen to those guys!

You don’t get a pat on the head for doing your adult duties.

Seriously, the US must have all its statute up online like the Parliament website.
I’ve seen various congressional and state ruling paperwork, but they never go over it and examine their priors.

I would myself but then I’ll be accused of bias for being both foreign and female.
I have however broken down election data on my own country, various demographic data by race, sex and age. The biggest predictor? AGE. Increasing the voting age or bringing in military service for everyone adult prior to voting (not ageist) would work better. But damn, they might have to stop valiantly defending the West from their keyboard for five minutes and pick up a gun.

Why be masculine when you can make a career out of talking about it?

These people brag about having multiple passports but they aren’t traitors, no!
They complain about terrorism and demand government Do Something. Well traditionally, they’d form an army out of you….
They expect a White Saviour (like Trump)… but hate on white nationalism, in white-spawned countries.

So he contents himself to crawl around waiting for approval by mimicking Vox Day (that won’t work, VD is a respected author).

They could earn some passing respect by actually looking at the damn data.

Either:-

-they don’t know how. Idiots

-they don’t care. Liars

There’s a distinct 3rd possibility.

They did, didn’t find the answer they wanted, and due to publication bias, left it in the drawer.
Again, liars.

If he sets foot on most European soil after that article, he could easily be up on human rights charges.

Satire doesn’t mean what you think it means. Calling FIRE in a theatre is still illegal. Mumbling the adult equivalent of ‘just kidding’ will make the judges angry. The male judges.

Why?

Well, he’s questioning the legal structure of foreign governments and suggesting an oppression – because oppression doesn’t exist. On incitement or sedition grounds alone, he could just disappear. That would be 100% his fault. It’s like stepping into a tiger enclosure and expecting not to get eaten. You do not bully the bigger guy, even if he seems tame. Ignorance of the ECJ law or EU law in general won’t be an excuse if the feminists (rightfully, for once) in this case, get you arrested for being a misogynist (stripping women of rights is A-grade proof in court, practically a working definition for the prosecution and he has not met the Burden of Proof for a ‘debate’ aside from hand-waving and emotional appeal, which does quite add to the misogyny thing). It cannot be simultaneously all A Joke and All A Serious Debate, depending which lawn looks safer today. Serious clowns do not exist. The fact it’s about running The West, to which he does not truly belong, means the American Free Speech shit does not apply.

Duh.

Rights belong to citizens. Citizens are loyal and dutiful and don’t oppress their peers, their legal equals. Oddly he is legally arguing that women have their citizenship rights revoked, the only way to restrict liberties, but in other materials, borders are just an idea (HBD says no). R-types always lie, even if they tell a truth it’s in bad faith to manipulate a 3rd party. It’s easy to spot by who says you’re too dumb to handle the data yourself…

It’s like he doesn’t know who Britain’s favourite person is. Nor how much power the monarchy have in Europe, let alone their common sex.
If they can murder their Muslim-breeding daughter-in-law, they can murder you.

European men don’t spend most of their free time bitching about the opposite sex, including those who live in America. We still remember the sexes need to get along for the race or species to survive. The culture clash is making even the redpill male friends of mine cringe away from these ‘losers’ explaining away their undesirability and start siding with the feminists, ‘in theory’.

He’s also clearly creeping to sex slavery of all women by revoking First World liberties aka AA with sex for ‘incel’ males (incels do not exist).

Is that the Muslim genes or the Jewish ones coming out? A harem system like Asia leads to war and over time fewer women anyway since they’re murdered post-birth. And the guys running a harem are military. And rich. Aka none of the things these bitches could be. They’re also atheists so all appeals to Muh Bible fall flat.

The misogynist-pointers at Biblical verse are actually quoting Judaism or referencing a blend of its pantheon with Eve (that is blasphemy), based on the Jewish character of Lilith. 
AKA nothing to do with Christians.

It’s as trite as the MGTOW cry of White men! Abandon your women! Never reproduce!* They want the brown ones anyway! We’ll gladly take them off your hands brother! They’re whores anyway, that’s why rape doesn’t exist!

*That’s how you can tell they’re ideologically aligned with SJWs.

Sex positive? Check.

Pro-outbreeding? Check.

Anti-family? Check.

Pro-degeneracy? Check.

Anti-natal? Check.

They really haven’t looked up Iceland, have they?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Icelandic_women’s_strike
‘The next year, “Iceland’s parliament passed a law guaranteeing equal rights for women and men.”

This was over something MINOR.

Fathers do not work as many hours as mothers, you can look it up but none of you will breed so thankfully it doesn’t matter to you. Childrearing and housekeeping are not fun, they are laborious or men would be lining up to do it and get paid.

You disrespect the valuable work women do, they strike. Which sex does the survival of the species rely on? Which sex is the primary caregiver? Which hand rocks the cradle? This is DARWIN. Kipling said ‘the female of the species is deadlier than the male’…. why do you think that is, Kemosabe?

If men are in fact superior, hypothetically…(the literal misogynist’s unscientific position to dehumanize women and strip us of agency/liberty, when they/we are merely sexually dimorphic) then logically at least most of what the feminists say must be true, since in nature the stronger dominates the weaker. This would necessitate the weaker to rightfully defend themselves. Choose your own ending, moron.

If you haven’t read the Bible, you may want to mull over why it’s women in the verse ‘Hell hath no fury…’
Consider very carefully if you wish to fuck with a strong majority of the globe, r-type scum.

It’s the Pandora’s Box of civilization. Because if the men all rally together, that obscures other topics like race, religion, age bracket, even partisanship! Convenient for self-aware r-types trying to get in with the Ks for protecting before the fighting starts (a kind of warfare cuckoldry, hiding safely behind the lines and letting the Real Men fight for you like a dusky damsel). And choosing as your opponents the one group that can’t match you in physical strength…. brave. They wouldn’t dare punch another man, but they’re happy to start on women, assuming we’ll never fight back. Yeah, they’re idyllic defenders of The West…. hiding behind other men. Usually white men. Brave and strong and independent little rebels.

Consider;

The feminists want a ‘Gender War’ – because men are going to lose.

World War G.

Men don’t even play well with one another. An all-male island would be a bloodbath. There’s no historical example of it. Sparta punished bachelors with a special tax. Roosh just wants to hide away until white men have taken white women’s rights away (temporarily) to increase his mating chances, especially if those men (superior competition) die in the process. Typical r-strategy, shout, run and hide. They have literally nothing to lose.

The r-type calls for things and asks you to do them for it.

Sorry, are you all his wife suddenly? He can’t even find one woman to agree to legally bind herself to him and his money, obviously he’s defective. He cannot run a single household and he has no child investments, he has no idea how to run a society (especially one of the outgroup, racially). Ghetto trash has more family values than Roosh V.

Let’s you and him fight – the cowardly r-type strategy of triangulation, to befriend the victor and free up resources (here, women). Let’s you and her fight – a level of scumbag that isn’t human(e). If men win, befriend men and take credit as Idea Guy for rewards (given women like goats). If women win, most men are dead, take excess supply of women – whether they want to be or not (smells like rape o’clock). You can move the rape genes to civilization but you can’t civilize rape genes.

Men, seriously. Anyone calling for a fight who isn’t willing to lead it is trying to kill you.

Western men are too soft to survive. HE KNOWS THIS.

He wants to kill your genes and your culture.

Traitor in our midst.

Eggs = expensive. Sperm = cheap. Foreva….

Finally, in fantasy land of Xenu Warrior Princes.

What happens if men ‘win’ but no woman will reproduce with them?

You die.

Idiots.

Unless you’re a happy genetic suicide like Roosh V, who can’t buy a wife with all his shekels, don’t listen to it?

He’s goading you to attack your future. This is all painfully obvious to women thanks to EQ. We know a conniving traitorous bitch when we see one. However, it’s unfair to call someone a traitor per se, when they were never one of us. Look up his background.

What happened to most of the edgelords?

They weren’t.

The edgelords, with no edges. The type to assume woman and feminist are synonymous, and liberal means gay, and refer to women as ‘females’ and ‘girls’, never noticing the ripple of cringe.

They’d use some of the same words (cuck, degenerate) but it was an empty power play to make shekels from personal branding, usually YT.

Most so-called alt-righters shouting it from the rooftops (and alt-lite, if that’s still happening) are just signallers punching down at feminists (just the women); they don’t even believe in CM, they don’t know, care or wanna know. They want someone to beat on and women seem a good target.

On any other topic e.g. Roosh’s race, they’re cuckier than the cucks. They retreat so far up their own arse, everything smells like shit. They are milquetoast keyboard alphas, totally incompetent IRL. Look at the manosphere. Look addit. Ask them: are all men equal? 

responses are hilarious and full of dissonance

wrong dr house urgh shut up idiots

they believe in sexual hierarchies, but also there are no leagues?
sex with a woman is good, the woman having sex with you is bad
there is no Hell but God’s a good idea
opinions mean nothing, unless a man has them
men can’t be ugly but women are shallow bitches
modern woman is entitled, man deserves social reparations
women are the cause of the world’s problems but totally incompetent
men have no duty to society but it sure owes us
real men…..
science is great because it questions things but don’t question me
projection is only real when women do it
men are always rational and therefore superior
women can’t be smart, look at this graph
I need a smart woman who’ll let me manipulate and humiliate her, but no other guy

The white Muh Dicks.

Bullies, all of them, pretending to stand for something other than their flaccid egocentrism.

The sort to look up to Nietzsche, seriously. You should be impressed.

As for degeneracy, those hypocrites and false prophets….

It’s no loss to our cause, believe me.
They were never with our cause.
They never understood us. Technically, they cucked us for a while, or tried to, cheering against our enemies doesn’t make them allies.

The dehumanization of sexism

the edgelords going round saying women aren’t human beings and shouldn’t vote because Vox Day was kidding about it (he couldn’t apply it to his own wife, she owns his balls) should probably look at the type of person who takes this seriously… this is your Spartacus

ultimateevil

behold

projection
entitlement
craven weakness
lust, pride, sloth, gluttony, all the mortal sin goodies in one ugly package
a psychotic ignorance of forensic fact i.e. HBD says you’re wrong, men are the violent ones
sex has nothing to do with state breeding programs, in fact, they’d likely ban it like 1984
as in more men would be virgin fathers (physically possible)
pro-white doesn’t work when you’re not white, expecting a white woman who only wants a white man means you’d get rejected, this guy is like the transracial ‘blacklivesmatter’ guy who refused to accept reality with predictable results
this isn’t about me, this is about everybody else! via me! – why can’t they do a goth phase seriously
patriarchy doesn’t give you sex on a plate, ever
actually the sexual revolution would be punished for
monsters are those who deny the agency of others but try to take the moral high ground on being good
his own father was degenerate, appeal denied, this whole thing is one FUCK YOU DAD FOR FUCKING MOM
sexual control is female because this is called civilization, you’re welcome to leave
men control which women keep their own babies with provision, and which do not
adultery laws protected women from bastard spawn competing with hers
neuroscience is also a thing, men are the psychopaths, case in point
these guys insulting women are the same guys selectively quoting the bible huh, they haven’t read it? Ruth? Mary?
like, the first serious thing God says to man is that he shouldn’t be alone
blood does out, as you can see by the crazy
I mean, at least he proved part of his own theory
classic blinkers on, his own sex is flawless, right? ignore, oh, ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY.
God is not a man. Man is not a God. The Word is not mortal in origin.
seeing sex instead of a matter of quality (cross-sexual issue, deliberate ignorance)
observations are lucid, not awfully convenient in paving over personal insecurities
perceptions are often deluded when the source is broken, like a magnifying glass, everything they look at, looks broken
judges women by appearance, pretends to be deep
judges women by appearance, expects women to judge him by buried ‘character’
men of intelligence know women seek their own quality level, maybe stay in your own lane?
leagues are a good thing really, they save time
degenerate offspring don’t survive the next societal crush, exhibit A, not an issue
their parents don’t care, Malthus’ trap happens
if women don’t have rights they just abort all their pregnancies until the men and their line die off
you need us, dipshit
all these ‘harem’ (rape fantasy) societies oddly have first world living standards (with half the labour force) and forget that honour is a female concept
genetic suicide before genetic theft (rape)
death before dishonour
it’s better to be childless than have children with certain males
we see their genetic fruit, who wants to invest? a bad tree….
white men can afford to give us equal rights, inc to reject them, because they know they have the quality level to keep us interested
no other race can really afford to do this, their own women will reject them unless the women are kept ignorant and unable to provision themselves, like children (and arguably incapable of consent)
we are reminded of all this every month when we suffer periods
and little fuckheads like you take the piss, thinking we should all aspire to be porn whores
that’s the level for ‘mother of your children’
how many manly men in history ever bitched at women for our nature like that? our gift of maternity? not a single one, or at least not one who had the privilege of enjoying our body to breed their heir while we suffered damage and years of pain for it
back to him
you had money and literally zero excuse
you could’ve paid for a blowjob but nnoooooooo
nope, depravity is cultural, stop trying to sage you’re like 12
implies women are too dumb to use their power but somehow overpower all intelligent men intellectually

excuse me I just-
Go get 'em girlfriend

that one tickles me…. hits rather close to home, in purely logical terms it’s a simple preposition;
if women on top, neither stupid nor weak, asshole

there is no creature more evil and depraved than the one tripping revenge fantasies involving sex slavery and state control of sacred intimacy

disease metaphor? that’s funny, considering the male urethra’s microbiome is a major vector in STD transmission
>deserve, not how rights work

if women are evil you shouldn’t breed with them, conversation over

^thus, the true rationale of the genetic suicide

you don’t want evil/semi-evil babies, and what about taking after China, and aborting or murdering all the female ones? who is evil then? ah, but these guys just want to go like Genghis Khan, the rapist
what a role model when they claim to be so intellectual

all humans are animals, where the fuck have you been

seriously I wanna slap this kid through the veil
you know how some people are so weak AND evil that it brings out your inner bully?
If women think there’s something damaged with you, and don’t want your superficial affection on that basis, and then you try to murder them, they were right!

Fight Club isn’t serious, guys

fightclubpua

The author said it was a joke, like American Psycho. I mean, just read around a little.

https://www.inverse.com/article/17363-chuck-palahniuk-thinks-fight-club-2-is-going-to-get-him-murdered

But Fight Club might be the most-quoted novel of the 20th Century. It rattles me to hear the constant references twenty years after publication. People should be quoting and making clever puns from lines in To Catch a Mockingbird or Portnoy’s Complaint. I’m just trying to put the genie back into the bottle.

He hates you. This isn’t my opinion.

Nevertheless, in Fight Club 3 he might be compelled to have sex with a sheep.

It’s a fucking fact.

But rest assured that even in my absence my estate will hire some hack to keep Tyler alive.

Normies killed it.

TLDR: Self-destruction isn’t a lifestyle choice. An ASOS for edgy betas would make a killing. Get your internet cool starter pack.

Real talk, for once. I pull no punches, for they deserve them.

Are you telling me they can’t read a single (rather shitty) novel and understand it, while shitposting on SJW IQ? Fuck, at least those degenerates are English majors.

Fight Club, summarized?

It’s a bunch of losers who are massive hypocrites (we hate capitalism, let’s start a soap company) and can only turn everything they touch to shit, but being too cowardly to kill themselves because death is scary, they slowly self-harm until overwhelmed by their own emo feels and stick their dick in crazy while high on some concoction of modern opiate supplements. They are worthless degenerate males who live for dopamine shots, in fact, somebody should just sell that shit pure because at least it’d be honest. Yes, it perfectly predicts the manosphere. They swear a lot and hate women (Fuck You Mom!) to get attention but in reality they probably work a shitty job and have delusions of grandeur as you’d expect from a gamma or delta male. The world will be a better place when they die, so they stubbornly cling to life because they never grew out of the hate the world Satanic Bible 8th grade phase.

The lament of a million coffee mules

It never occurs to them to look up Brad Pitt’s other work from the period (ALL emo).

Seriously, ask their opinion of La Vey.

Tryhard, IRL. They worship him, like a faggy Dawkins (outfits, edgy cosplay).

They aren’t nihilists, they’re masochists who won’t admit self-loathing so they blame anything else – their job, their sofa, their clothes, the girls, society. They’re searching for meaning but refute anything that makes them think about something other than themselves for five fucking minutes. Chuckie crapped out this self-indulgent pulp and these morons called it a masterpiece, he admitted the movie was better for this reason.

I love these MSM posts. It’s funny to watch the normies hustle and the useful idiots get things totally 180 degrees, completely arse-backwards wrong.

Like the people who don’t know ‘woke’ is Matrix slang.

correction ohuhno idiots

You cannot correct that level of dumb. It’s a major plot point of a classic movie.

Speaking of their level of desperate.

MRAs, huh?

maleentitlement

http://conversationrage.weebly.com/
Same type of guy who’ll say respect isn’t given, it’s earned.

When I say ‘male entitlement’, think of this guy.

Probable male borderline, on the subject.

To round this off, if Fight Club were serious (it’s anti-capitalist porn) then all men would be farmers.
Do you want to be a farmer, grunting and sweating in the dirt?

They started an internet movement when someone made a few polygons in their vidyah games in a shape they disapproved of. They cannot cope IRL.

Idiots. They want to roll back civilization but keep all the fluffy, fun stuff.
Fight Club is a book about male entitlement.

He was mocking these chucklefucks buying his BRANDED SOAP FOR STUPID VAIN FAT BINTS.

Read it with that in mind and everything makes sense.

exh A

We’ve all been raised on television to believe that one day we’d all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won’t. And we’re slowly learning that.

Then you’re a fucking idiot for believing it, aren’t you? Do you believe in Santa too? Job fairy? Do you have a lucky red cum sock?
It’s the non-romantic economic 500 Days of Summer. Marla is an evil manic pixie.
Prove me wrong.

Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.

Throwing a weak punch does not make you a man.

It’s MGTOW but like IRL MGTOW, they refuse to leave. They never actually Go. They’re like that one girl who threatens to leave hoping to get praise. They could all move to a single town or small city, but no. Then they’d need to be self-reliant. Most couldn’t make mac n’ cheese from scratch. I could teach that to a chimpanzee. They utterly fail as men, they’re morally bankrupt males posturing principles. Patriarchy would kick their arse.

You want your happy safe space penguin?
Here it is.

failed-abortion-penguin