Link: Gaslighting in marriage – why it’s wrong

It isn’t purely men that do this but in a marriage, I’ve never heard of a woman doing it.

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2016/01/20-situations-in-which-men-gaslight-women/

Those ‘redpill husbands’ claiming this is prosocial domination are covering for their antisocial, divorce-causing behaviour.

In a 1998 study of 130 newlywed couples designed to explore predictors of divorce or marital stability, marriage researcher and author Dr. John Gottman and colleagues, labeled this observed behavior of husbands — as “bat-em-back” — due to the force with which husbands automatically acted to cut off any attempts of wives to influence. To the researchers, this intentional behavior was likened to that of a baseball player at the plate, ever ready to “bat” a home run.

This and subsequent studies found that a husband’s “refusal to accept influence from his wife” — in effect, gaslighting — is highly predictive of divorce. On the bright side, findings also showed that a husband’s “acceptance of influence from his wife” is even more predictive of a stable and happy marriage.

Essentially he’s depriving her of her role, refusing to allow her to support him.
Well, if you didn’t want support, why aren’t you single?
If you hate the feminine, why legally and spiritually bind yourself to it?

Are the abusers honest about this fact? No.
Never. They’d lose control. You cannot cooperate with someone who wants to destroy you.
They don’t care about the marriage bond and they certainly don’t care about the other spouse.
In Biblical terms, they are letting the team down on the cherish part of the vow.

Naturally, the problem here is not male partners, rather the social conditioning that trains men to anxiously feel they have to prove masculinity on the basis of how different they are from women — and in general that means avoiding the “soft” stuff their female partners want, such as romance, nonsexual touch, doing things she wants or likes (without feeling emasculated), etc.

Anyone who does that whipped sound, you can tell they’re bad with women.
Love is a verb. Do or do not do.

Culturally speaking, we don’t trust that a baby boy will grow to become a man in the same way that an acorn becomes an oak tree. We expect men to be on guard throughout their lives to prove they are the “real” thing, and not “sissies” or “gay” and the like. And men’s fears are real; everyone is “watching,” male and female, ready to shame them to get back on track. (This shaming has intensified in last two decades.)

As Ali notes, gaslighting is a result of social conditioning rooted in a set of beliefs regarding gender roles and masculinity, such as that:

  • Women’s opinions don’t hold as much weight.

  • Women’s wants should not be treated as legitimate.

  • Men should never express regret when their actions have caused pain.

aka psychopath

Who doesn’t want to live with a psycho?

Geez, no wonder they divorce the bastard.

If they really believed any of those false beliefs, they would never, ever marry.
They’d rather die on the end of a shotgun.

I don’t think the men who do this realize – if we brought back fault-divorce, men would lose because dissolution is normally their fault. It’s a failure of EQ on their part. That’s also why they refuse therapy, they don’t want to change, like a toddler. They’d rather hurt/weaken or lose the spouse.

“Hamstering” explained as bullshit;

Because women are conditioned to collaborate and empathize, this tactic can send a woman’s brain into an exhaustive wheel-spinning mode of explaining, complaining, crying, begging, pleading, etc. (and women’s socialization leaves them more susceptible …),  and deceive a man’s brain into making several false, misleading (and unfortunate) conclusions.

Victim blaming, hilarious. Note that they’re fine around normal people though. It’s mere proximity to the loser who feels the need to throw around diagnoses like a Munchausen by Proxy (Woe is me because of them) that’s the real issue.

For one, they interpret the effectiveness of this thought control tactic to silence their partner’s voice as “proof” of men’s superiority, rightful dominance, strength and intelligence compared women’s, etc., and thus get tricked into relying on a tactic that harms their relationship, and gradually pushes their partner away.

They crave attention, spew bullshit, get what they wanted – but it’s the woman’s fault?
Amazing magic trick.
The dumbass doesn’t know he’s conditioning women not to provide him affection.

That’s a level of retard I’ve never seen.

In truth, gaslighting is a major obstacle to forming a healthy, vibrant couple relationship — emotional intimacy. For most female partners, for example, a failure to build emotional intimacy often means a gradual loss of interest in sex.

Literally the manosphere.

Women don’t want me – how is this their fault?

But while discussing their relationships, you can never, ever talk about them.

Guess the common factor.

Guess the problem.

Link: Inferiority: the opposite of genius

http://paulcooijmans.com/genius/inferior.html

I don’t expect those who pretend to care about the IQ dearth to read around.
I post these things for the intellectually honest.

Hating women

It may seem strange to include this specific form of hatred with the list, but a fact is that many inferiors have a deep hatred of women, which makes it a characteristic of inferiority.

If we’re examining personality traits of inferiors, it is completely valid as a behavioural marker.

Just as with geniuses, most inferiors are men. The ultimate in this are feats like the burning of widows, or demanding women to spend their lives indoors or walk six metres behind their husband, covered from head to toe with their genitals cut up beyond all repair.

In addition, rape is standard behaviour of inferiors, typically resulting in the conception of multiple children with many different women. Relevant in this respect is that imprisoned males in Western countries conceive more children than do males on average, mirroring the phenomenon that in primitive hunter-gatherer societies the males with the most offspring – as confirmed by modern D.N.A. studies – are those who have made the greatest number of kills in tribal warfare.

Uncivilized breeders who can’t cooperate to literally save their lives, sound like any type of selection we know?

Don’t hate me cos you ain’t me.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/
“We feel more stress, but we cope better. This explains how we put up with stupid men.”

It’s useful to define a thing by NOT, in computing as in people.

It’s logical that if they didn’t hate, they couldn’t rape. It’s selected for, but let’s not go naturalistic fallacy and pretend a First World society can stand for it.

Intelligent people are capable of working with those they dislike without wanting to brain them and drag them back to the cave. Something about not being a monster.

The ‘trick’ to redpill is to accept things you don’t like because reality won’t change.

Link: The stupidity of ‘White Sharia’, it’s anti-reality

They’re the type of kid at school who just lied lied lied lied lied and expected everyone would just go along with it.

In a little kid, it’s passable. In men over the age of 21, it’s a mental illness.

I’d bet a lot of them are male borderlines, considering their neurosis over wife abandonment. They get hostile if you question it, there is such a thing as a happy marriage, just not one that involves them. They are the problem.
They don’t mention most of the worst divorce stories are actually inter-racial, white husband and Asian wife.
You’re not supposed to ask, it triggers their narcissistic rage when you question their brain. There isn’t much in there.

https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/06/white-sharia-alt-right-at-war-with.html

It actually came from the manosphere, not the Alt Right. They bled over here and want to bring their dindu Muh Dick ways with them. They think this is mature and manly, as opposed to the shameful self-control of a bonobo.
The woman question? Is that the best name they can come up with? That sounds like a pathetic attempt to draw focus.

Oh, what would that look like?
Like, most rapists are women?
Most murderers are women?
Most deadbeat parents are mothers?
Er… yeah, it isn’t a *woman* problem, is it?

It comes down to – women won’t be my free whore, the problem is women, the whores. 

They want to control the return to traditionalism because they’re too scared of women to be nice to them and perhaps maybe marry and pass on their shit(skin) genes.

Look up the Iceland strike. They’d die without female cooperation. They deserve to, by Parental Investment Theory. Humans need both parents or they’re messed up. A lot of these guys love/hate their mother, especially if their father cheated on her. To this day, they blame her for his fuck-ups, literally.
Sharia only works on the low IQ, it’s designed to keep them from killing each other. The high IQ have meritocracy and cooperation and that’s why we’re civilized. The Ice Age improved our genome past that point, see A Troublesome Inheritance.
The history they claim has never existed, they believe in the mommy-wife apron Fantasyland that only existed in 50s vacuum cleaner adverts. And if women are homemakers, men must be soldiers. You don’t get to sit on your ass in the unions or be a paid-up party man.

They are totally ignorant of ancient and European history but spout off about white people. The keyboard alphas there are 9/10 non-white, it’s the dirty secret of PUA – brown man seeks white harem.

Let’s take a few of the rationalisations;

“Women’s sexual desires, almost universally, are straightforward and one-dimensional; they desire the physically strong and dominant man.”
Biology says that’s men with simple lust, quit projecting. You can’t even get a woman to orgasm, don’t pretend you know how we work. In long-term mate selection studies, women choose the ‘Dad’ model and reject the ‘Cad’, you are literally 180-degrees wrong.
“Therefore, race is not a romantic factor for women. They simply want the strongest.”
White women miscegenate the least in all dating website studies. On theapricity forum, for example, many of the ‘white people preservation’ men, are dating Asians.
“And white men are pussies, which is why white women increasingly prefer non-white men.”
Would a white man write that? Who planted that idea? Disciple of Roosh?
Who told you who they prefer?
Where’s your data? Your opinion is not valid, at all.


Why all the assaults and harassment and rape gangs if the white women actually wanted them?

“Anglin attempts to pound his readers into submission by aggressively insisting his claims are settled science—this is a common tactic people use to try to cover for the fact that they’re full of crap. You’ll notice, for instance, that nowhere in the article does he link to a single scientific study. (Although he does provide links for his readers to purchase steroids.)”
Oh, steroid brain. It reduces your humanity.

If it’s settled, you must have a list of studies with cracking methodology.
…..They never do.

But they’re definitely projecting because as this genius links

They have Yellow Fever and want to pretend the white women didn’t want them first.
https://meetville.com/blog/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

Instead of attacking White Fever, they attack women.
Almost as if the men writing it….have it?
divide and conquer, cleave the white man from women, and the women are defenseless…
POS r-types

Their greatest enemy is chivalry, which is actually human decency.
Chivalry also applied to other gentlemen, like, they don’t even bother knowing what words mean, the illiterate brown bastards. It existed in the upper classes because they lugged around the big weapons…like cops carrying guns now. They follow a code, right? What do you think that is?

“The only consistent messages from the data is that the majority of women want a man who (1) is taller than them and (2) is not a fat slob.”
where they fail us
they think they can raise an incest baby grown in a fake womb
but they lack the time out of their busy schedule of bile to lose the chub

Women are sexist if they don’t want a short, balding, lazy fatass.
– they’re literally fat acceptance feminists with the sexes inverted

They don’t know how repulsive they are. It’s the entitlement. They think Patriarchy would entitle them to a wife. Like, what, fathers care so little they hand out coupons?

And I bet Mr 3.5 thinks he would get a cute, 17yo white 8.

You prove financial stability, the woman provides her fertility, idiot.
Women do provide – life. You can’t print life at the bank.

In Biblical times, men had rites of passage. You didn’t pass? You didn’t pass on your genes. Stop crying, baby.
They don’t actually study how patriarchies worked, especially with white people.
You’d get strung up for defiling someone’s daughter – for some reason they aren’t too keen on listening to rape victims…. acting like the rapist is the Real Victim Here.
They use fake screen names and no photo because you’d see the racial composition here, and the lower average IQ of those groups.

“Are you beginning to see just how far the ideology of the neo-patriarchic Alt Right is disconnected from reality?”

the word is ‘psychotic’, Gerry

“Just try to think about the real world for ten seconds. Which of these statements do you honestly think is closer to the truth: (A) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the most attractive 5% of men. (B.) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the toughest 5% of men. Of course, there is some overlap between these two categories of men, but clearly (A) is the right answer. If you’re an adult and haven’t noticed this by now, you’re either dumb as a rock or have very eccentric tastes in women.”

They are too dumb to believe in Darwin. Roosh actually reviewed a book of philosophy by a modern writer and thought he disproved evolution. You see, Darwin would mean women are right to have standards – the peacock displays, not the peahen.

They don’t believe in male beauty or more literally, the manosphere refuses to believe in their own ugliness.
They can’t rub testosterone cream over their mug and look like Brad Pitt.

Practically, none of this will ever happen.

How are you gonna get these women from their fathers? Is that not pedophilia? How can you marry someone without consent? Won’t they just throw themselves down the stairs if you rape them pregnant?

The lookism guys are much smarter and genuinely self-improving. The PUAs hate those guys, because they get results.

They know deep down it’s about them and their deep ugliness but this makes them bitter. They have to cheat, like an Asian chick getting tit implants to get a white boy interested. For the first time in history, the low SES have a voice online.

“This Manosphere/neo-patriarchy stuff isn’t just embarrassing because it’s so thoroughly wrong, it also comes off as really pathetic. The Alt Right is supposed to be a serious ideological movement, not a self-help seminar. For a movement that spends so much time worrying about trying to appear as the “cool kids” (way too much time), you’d think people around here would be sensitive to how “beta” this looks to most people. You live in a country where women consider white men to be most attractive, so if you’re having a hard time out there, I’m sorry brother, but that’s on you. Don’t taint the ethnonationalist cause by associating it with your sexual frustrations.”

They are not Alt Right.
They are MGTOW who reject K-selected unions and never want to marry.
They are genetic suicides who don’t want children unless they can abandon them to a nanny.
There is nothing traditional in them. They think it will oppress or upset women, that’s their motive, to hurt women in revenge. [cough Elliot Rodger cough]
Since when has a good husband and motherhood upset a K-woman????
WHEN?

These losers call themselves redpill but ignore any data that isn’t cherry-picked to cater to their feelings.
Oh, but women are special snowflakes because …periods?
What’s their excuse, broflakes? They’re like Trigglypuff if you mention the world doesn’t revolve around their micropenis.
They can’t attract women because they hate women. Duh.
“Since ideological truth is subjective, you can base your ideology on anything, but just because you can, doesn’t mean that you should. One thing the neo-patriarchists should do though, is man-up and admit they were wrong.”

They’re Peter Pan fuckboys, they’re trash. They’re so passive aggressive they’ve sabotaged their own lives, let them go and destroy themselves. They have the right.

The strangest thing about these discussions?

They deny HBD (on race) but then try to mouth off on HBD topics…. with no awareness of how HBD findings are compiled or any real, good data.

They’re sub-100 IQs trying to pass themselves off as mathematically literate.
Milo started this with one (literally one) article on an IQ finding.

He didn’t want to be scientific and get a psychometrician in, just punch down (as he sees it). It’s like a 13yo’s view of strength, the bully model.
Their role models are a Jewish homo and Roosh, who supposedly has both Jewish and Muslim blood…. that explains the nose job, frankly…

yeah, these guys wanna bring in Christian patriarchy, we can trust them!

Bonus: the sad autism of notch counters.

The phenomenon pointed up here with our lad is that of the “notch count.” In his case, the notches are for amusingly inconsequential things: hugging his cousin, having an internet “girlfriend” for a week or so, etc. Our lad exults in his “success” with the ladies, when in truth his supposed achievements have been minimal to non-existent.  But to chortle at his embarrassingly unearned exultation misses the broader critique implied here. Even if that which counts for legitimate “notches” in our lad’s estimation doesn’t amount to much in our perception, his degradation doesn’t consist in his absence of “legitimate” action; rather, it lies in the fact that he, like many men, base their feeling of masculine self-worth on the number of “notches” they have obtained.

from https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/10/autistic-notch-count.html

They’re trying to be the popular girl…. by being sluts.
Manwhores have the dignity of jailbait. Look how much of a fake they can be, to get women to laugh!
It’s counterphobic, they hate/fear women so spend all their spare time… literally fucking women over.

The bad women couldn’t control men without sex. Feminists told men that being sluts was something to brag about….. figure it out. I hate to see adult males demean themselves.

Some people can’t spot satire

Is it mean to point out many of them would fit the stereotype for autism?
White, male, middle-class, high-school educated, does less well at college so hates colleges, straight but scared of gay men, has trouble with women for some mysterious reason that has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that they laugh at the existence of EQ and SQ, genuinely believe themselves superior to everyone forever, therefore incredibly gullible (to things like honeypots and borderline women) because they think if something’s easy they’re not missing something, it’s just their natural awesome brains coming out.

h/t blog.dilbert.com/post/162786625861/people-who-cant-recognize-humor-literally

She’s basically running through a list and shows no signs of nervous distress, her tone is mocking and sarcastic.

If these men can’t see that, it isn’t Da Wimminz that are dumb.

I’ve noticed their way of insulting real SJWs differs. A female SJW is insulted because she’s a woman, what do you expect? Women are crazy bitches with all the power that can trick men with their evil vagina magic… but also magically stupid and inferior. A male SJW is insulted in spite of being a man, so they ratonalise he must be an inferior man, rather than very clever but evil, for example. They also don’t really know what a beta is, but claim to love evolution…..

Classic aspie logic. Anything to preserve the ego as superior.

The Left mindset detests beauty

I want to comment on a comment left on VD’s blog.

I won’t link because it’s irrelevant.

“They hate you not because you are Christian but because you are white, they only hate Christianity because it is a proxy for traditional European culture.”

Every war is a race war. It’s all Darwin, all genetic, a selection pressure.
The Left’s only lasting principle is anti-white. This is unusual for its longevity when their signals change constantly to confuse us  and keep us reactive so we can’t intellectually mobilize.

The mindset of the left is the mindset of the serial killer whenever they see a pretty white women they want to torture and kill her.

Ed Gein was a tranny, btw.
“When I see a pretty girl…”
And despite the Oedipal issues in misogyny, nobody advocates returning to Freud.
Men need standards of honour and decency not blame and bitchiness.

They want to get rid of white men so all white women can be raped.

The fake right who think a brown man’s opinion is greater than any white woman….on the white homelands? Tempted to point out that’s cultural theft, outright.
When the West is undefended, it dies. If Western man is weak, woman falls prey. Sex is the reward of conquest, breeding.
Sexual divide and conquer is a cloak and dagger to ignore the racial element of ‘tension’ issues.
Multiculturalism is the enemy, men and women were fine while homogenous in their own homelands.
Remember that, they don’t want you to. Immigration is the Trojan horse. You can’t be raped by someone in another continent and Muslims use homosexual rape as a punishment too. I’ve mentioned this recently.

They want all pretty people castrated so that only the ugly can breed because they hate beauty and love ugliness. Cucking pretty people into adopting brown babies and supporting the third world is just their consolation prize. They would like all pretty people to have their faces mutilated for the sake of equality.”

Ah, Harrison Bergeron, so predictive of the politics of Cultural Marxist envy.
This was a comment floating the idea of white men converting to Islam en masse. 2 issues.
1. women wouldn’t follow. We’re not stupid. Jesus never needed to hit a woman when you hurt his feelings. That’s strength, in all mating preference studies for marriage, women prefer conscientiousness in men. Sadism is the polar pathological opposite. At best, they’d attract the crazy ones.
2. you can preach and quote without conversion, especially quoting the common opinions on Jews. This might be why older working-class factions like Corbyn are temporarily aligned with the Muslims.
It’s a countersignal to temporarily defang them, especially from splintering off into their own party and forming an Islamic Party of Great Britain, which would eat into Labour’s own voteshare. However, it pushes us further away from a return to national traditionalism, where true security and progress lies. Meanwhile, NRx has long discussions of what traditionalism is, but fine if you want to ignore it. What comes after your civil war? Vacuums need plans.
Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a war manual, to submit to supranational slavery. They’re worse than the Catholics ever were. The majority of Muslims would starve if the taxpayer stopped funding them, they’re leeches in the most literal fiscal sense. Without production, how do they take over? Well, enslavement. The Left are lazy and already parasitic as r-types, do you really think they’ll work harder for the Arab than the European? No, they won’t work at all. We destroy the Left by letting their chickens come home to roost, by encouraging squabbles and in-fighting. They have no loyalty to the host nation or one another, this will come to a head and the sooner the better. Concern trolling as one group to another. This works. Black ops is invisible to idiots.
All you need to do is cite the Talmud AND the Koran, there are plenty of online resources for passages, cite it with original, not dhimmi or gentile wording, and the Left cannot object to this without their favourite pet turning on them because the Left is entirely dis-united. This signal boosts the true face of these religions too. Anything that stops them pulling together strengthens us. Otherwise, demographics is a ticking time bomb. It needs to be kept as casual references, defanging the cultural and acadmic power of Cultural Marxists who think Islam is so secular and neoliberally progressive. Simply throw it in their face casually often enough and they’ll stop signalling it. I know how these people work so please listen to me. Tweeting passages to celebrities and using them casually in articles is the ultimate weapon. It doesn’t take them seriously because only the Left are stupid enough. It’s a glorious shitpost.

I’ve mentioned the technical apsects of signalling here many a time, if you take it seriously, the signalling value is NIL.

This also gives away the premise and paradigm to the enemy, to judge you on their metrics. You want to flip the sociological (social) script by questioning their premises but in such a way they feel ashamed to openly discuss those premises. You cannot be serious, that’s WHY the Left cannot meme! No sense of humour! Too serious!

They almost want you to use their memes, to embolden them as the only ones worth stealing. I know how they’d play this because I know how these people operate. I already know how they’ll break their own toys if you steal them – white privilege. It’s been set up this whole time, beginning with the original sin of white guilt. Instead you must oppose the r-selected behaviours. That is their Achille’s because according to them, all behaviour is a Tabula Rasa CHOICE.

R-types enable r-types. Do not enable them in rape, theft or murder. They want that. Never do what the enemy wants, reaction formation is sane when you’re acting in self-interest.

They detest any meme that calls them to demonstrate virtue, see “so much for the tolerant Left” which exposed their hatred and bloodlust for civilized culture. The Left always come out with their authoritarian face eventually and we need to speed this up. Let people see them for what they truly are. If we keep trying to out them, they bury deeper like societal termites. Let them in-fight and expose themselves. They oppose liberty, the intellectual freedom to dissent foremost. Workers must keep working – or else. Show them which hand holds the whip.

That is how status signalling works. You don’t walk up to someone and say “I’m rich”, you mention your holiday in the Alps. Don’t sperg all over the place and think you’ll change them and their Narrative. You’ll just vindicate Muslim positions when you should be vindicating Christian ones using Islam and Judaism so they dunno which one to start on without either sponsor turning like a rabid dog. Game theory, guys. We’re using their common tactic of triangulation against them, because they are naturally diverse, divided and we are not.

You can’t countersignal a countersignal (eugenic by dysgenic), you can’t satire a satire (the Alt Right’s success, see: Why mockery?) but you can signal something similar but different, to weaken the original one and strengthen your future ones. Think of it as ideological lubricant. We need to slide into a real war on terror with Crusades nice n’ easy.

The first move in chess has the most freedom but the second holds the strategic advantage since the opponent’s move is already set. To choose another game, we need only knock down their dominoes. They’ve arranged them opposing one another, it’s a flawless set-up IF ONLY you get them to swipe at one another, also giving us time to replace them culturally. This is why I am also NRx and see no contradiction with calling for a cultured aristocracy. It replaces the extant academic degenerate class of Cultural Marxism, which the Alt Right’s existence is dependent on. When CM is gone, the AR too shall disband, like soldiers after the war. To do what? Depends on your traditionalist vision of utopia.

The stage five clingers will just be shirkers power-tripping.

Do you want to save the West or call someone an n-word online?

TFW not red-pill according to newbies

My feelings are so hurt I’m gonna start a Youtube AND a Patreon!

http://meme-magic-agency.com/redpill/

There are clearly some BS questions in there.

A few are simply out-of-place PUA/MRA/MGTOW shit.

If you don’t want to roll back the Sexual Revolution of the 60s, you can’t roll back to any prior time period, Einsteins.

Like assuming Universal Suffrage is female-only (look up the actual laws), and the Alpha Bro question with no basis in statistics (the provider breeds, the genetic father remaining – father is a verb – increases fitness according to all known results, to start it’s called the Parental Investment Hypothesis). A ‘psychologist’ should know these things…..

Nothing about HBD or civic nationalism, for instance. It’s more of an Alt-Lite PUA list. You can’t own a concept like redpill. Reddit tried that. This is No True Redpill, trying to outgroup the people with the facts, the people who made this more than a few memes during election season. I have a special helicopter waiting just for you, red carpet for the self-proclaimed Alpha that doesn’t ‘believe’ in evolution.
Blaming the wimminz is what weak men do. It divides the two halves necessary for reproduction, the true purpose of feminism. Not shekels, that ‘genocide’ thing you mentioned…

17309647_193580121141068_377832536047522180_n

I’ve been using this tagline the best part of a decade so you can pry it from my cold dead fingers, you Tinder-loving gym fags. Not one traditionalist question or anything philosophical about how to structure a healthy society, so it’s all normie trying to signal edgy with zero productive ideas. Like critical theory for the right.

18268533_1354733824621330_5671789448836126303_n

You can’t outgroup the original founders, you Roosh-cucking degenerates.

But at least they called me Hitler.

17800007_1893017997654152_4251070920055965993_n

You won’t be a Party member of any Patriarchy without a family.

They’ll get bored when they realize the Alt Right won’t allow them to rest on their arses signalling on Twitter like an SJW. The AR is undergoing a purge of lightweights or else it’ll die and change form like a phoenix. You do have to get up and work for this, and give up all the deviance you’re addicted to. That’s the barrier to entry, not learning certain terms. If you refuse to marry, you don’t believe in marriage, you might as well be Milo. Your ‘sex life’ impresses no one.

But at least they called me Hitler, so you know I must be onto something.

Since when did autist mean factually correct?

Sluts on the morality of slutting:

manwhores

The first was Henry VIII.

I love how they’re going the way of NRx and trying to claim ‘official’ beliefs, like a doctrine of a religion. You don’t get to exclude people. You have no moral authority. You’re not running this show. Your MSM-baiting ‘gatherings’ involve the e-celeb cancer thinking it’s important. You’re as bad as Laci Green, you just come from the opposite claim, totally passively reacting to whatever the Left says, standing for nothing yourselves. Just anti-, opposing, spite.
Way to bury any ideology, formalize. Next these losers will get matching homoerotic hoodies to go with their Man-Gorilla book. What’s the size of a gorilla’s dick again? Tiny.

The people writing this shit are genetic suicides and atheists, their opinion is liberal trash.
Commie by behaviour. Look at dem birth rates… wait, that’s abortion from your ‘notches’. Proud papa. They were libertarian gamer trash porn addicts before Gamergate.

Meanwhile, you know they’re a degenerate slut trying to explain away all the party years (ongoing) by insulting people who score highly too. They’re still living it up in the Pussy Parade and expect an obedient wife to take on their STDs and cheating risk once they start losing more hair and getting fat.

R-types are defined by their selfish entitlement.
However, we know they’re incapable of monogamy so the joke’s on anyone dumb enough to ring it.

Still, better than 8values.

Layers reach nouveau irony

Credit: Respect women memes

I can see why, thot is being applied to any woman regardless of sluttiness.

The original rule is no SC dog filter selfies. That is fair. That is 100% pure thot.

What’s happened?

Including the ones who just choose to look pretty instead of fat. How’s that for shooting yourself in the foot as a sex? Especially the one cued by evolution to prize appearance. Sounds like a feminist black ops, tbh, if they had the brains to smear on a cracker.

You’re normalizing sluts. You’re making the Kardashians seem average.

You’re pushing girls to tumblr to complain about being called thots.

Don’t do tumblr, kids.

If it’s an insult ugly girls use to demean pretty girls, don’t use it on pretty girls who dindu nuffin, idiots.

It’s becoming like the male overuse of cuck. I blame myself.