An affront to human dignity

Not only will this be applied to men by gay guys with programming skills (introducing a way of faking harassment) BUT the timing of this accomplishes 2 things:

  1. any dodgy blackmail photos from Hollywood pedos can now be called fake, plausibly
  2. this can be applied to Christian wives, virgin women and little girls. It’s a blackmail app.

It revokes the right to not be humiliated (as in times of war) from Christian, moral women.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/kzm59x/deepnude-app-creates-fake-nudes-of-any-woman

Being seen naked is a specific form of medical consent, lock the programmer up.

Use of likeness to produce illegal porn, passing off as real, distribution without model release signatures, violating religious right to modesty etc.

It violates fraud law, there’s defamation, human rights violations especially dignity, this is NOT Brave New World, America.

You are not entitled to other people’s bodies. Sexualization of unwilling participants is anti-human.

The Jews of Hollywood have failed to capture Gen Y and Z white women (more conservative than previous generations) so now fall back on this to digitally force them into prostitution.

Digital sex slavery. Cyber sex slaves. Bravo, atheistkult, another pillar of civilization besmirched.

Simply mock up the programmer’s mother in various pornographic poses to really drive the evil of this home.

I don’t think this software actually exists, more of an advanced form of photoshop.

Still illegal as sin. Public vice should be publicly shamed.

America is Freud’s retarded stage of genital fixation.

They’re briefed on terrorists

Motive doesn’t matter. Public attacks matter.

https://www.rt.com/usa/462475-incels-threat-air-force-briefing/

They know something.

Wide scale plans online?

Whether the excuse was sex-based or not, incitement to attack random civilians is totally their purview.

So-called incels are not actually virgins and most virgins are happy about their lot. Incels aren’t getting as much sex (or rape) as they feel entitled to. You don’t have to be a virgin to be “incel”, stop.

comment

It shows you how soft people have become to blame others for their own mental illness.

Misogynists project their shadow onto women then try to destroy women. Doesn’t work. They screech like banshees and wonder why all men avoid them too. There’s no AA for sex, as uncabob said, try being attractive. Firstly, don’t be an abuser. These low IQ degenerates existed since the time of Bluebeard.

Their language is infantile aversion. Female? Female what? Smurf?

Scared of the mere word woman, bloody snowflakes.

If you keep threatening to kill the majority of a white population, a powerpoint is warranted.

comment

It’s all the woman’s fault. They have no respect for men. They destroy what they allegedly love. Sad, actually. Sad for men.

You don’t deserve respect for having a dick. You earn it.

We don’t love you, lazybones. Women are not your mother.

reply

No jobs, no prospects and then they blame women for not wanting to go out with them. Why don’t the Incels get mad at the economy instead?

That would require responsibility.

Growing up.

It’s sexist to ask Peter Pan to act his age.

Your death bed can’t hear excuses.

reply by a gamma

Men and women are not equal, they differ by a chromosome. Plus the argument that men should empathize with women because they are also human beings is rubbish.

Men are mutant women, have lower IQ and more criminals.

If we’re going red pill to oppress anyone, really wanna go there?

Thinks women aren’t human, wonders why they don’t love him.

You couldn’t make it up.

This is the fruit of child centred parenting.

The rotten, rotten fruit.

They’re so busy swallowing their own bullshit you’d think they were doing porn.

[citation needed] for every sweeping statement you can’t call them on

Like, female brain types exhibit cognitive benefits, they’re not even wrong.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/

Men have so many neurological pathologies precisely because of their mutant brain.

gamma 2

Thereby admitting that women are after our money?

What money? You’re an overgrown baby.

These guys needed to be bullied as a child. Severely. You can only beat out that level of stupidity.

reply by the sane

Sure they are. How else are you going to support the 4 children that you are all planning to have? This is all about your genes making it into the next generation – do you expect women to pay for you?

Their gender role, exactly.

This is not about survival, let’s be serious. It’s about luxury.

Not wanting to starve with a loser’s baby is a luxury!

This is why most men in history weren’t allowed to breed.

sane person

Well, even the male bird has to build the nest for the female bird to get interested in mating with him. That is what babies require.

No, but Incels want a family of their own with little chilblains.

Men are not entitled to female fertility, only rapists think so. They could adopt or hire a surrogate but they don’t want to spend any time with their own child raising it, let alone the “easy” work of being a full-time single parent on a huuuuuge welfare check. Narcissists shouldn’t breed.

What woman wouldn’t want them. In their life. Forever.

You are a woman I see. It is women like you that cause men distress.

Snowflakes.

Men built the world you live in, wimmin contributled eff all

Wrong and note, they themselves, also men, are useless eaters on other men (and women).

Women contributed children and so, everything men did.

Alexander the Great was only great because of his mother, read a book.

lucid commentator

Maybe weak men with weak psyche’s…

Men weak in character blame all but themselves. Since they can never be women, that’s the easy target.

The old term is wastrel.

Well done America

New law will force child sex abusers to pay for their own castration before being released from jail

Needs to be surgical, however, and all rapists, considering criminal versatility this would reduce overall crime.

No half-measures.

A new law will force pedophiles whose victims were under 13 to pay for their own castration before they’re released from jail. The HB 379 bill was signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey Wednesday after being introduced by Republican State Representative Steve Hurst. It will see child molesters undergo chemical castration, with drugs used to suppress their sexual urges. Anyone who refuses to do so will be considered in violation of their parole and kept in prison.

They want to let the pedos out, this is an excuse.

And lower age of consent to 13.

Obviously.

Explaining the reasoning behind the controversial proposal, Hurst told CBS42: ‘They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime. ‘I had people call me in the past when I introduced it and said don’t you think this is inhumane?

Forcing rape victims to carry to term is inhumane. The trauma of any rape victim is inhumane.

It’s discrimination based on age, this cannot be lawful.

The rapist clearly cannot be trusted to use their organ in a legal manner.

If there’s a way to do it surgically to female pedos, them too.

Everyone on the rapist’s side should be on some kinda list.

‘I asked them what’s more inhumane than when you take a little infant child, and you sexually molest that infant child when the child cannot defend themselves or get away, and they have to go through all the things they have to go through. ‘If you want to talk about inhumane – that’s inhumane.’

God didn’t say one rape was okay.

Half measures are evil.

Day before 13? Evil. Day after? Go ahead. WTF.

Rape victims in general cannot defend themselves, they tend to freeze, it’s been studied.

A total just world fallacy requiring telepathy, precognition and super strength.

Let’s leave him drunk in a bath-house and see if he can ‘get away’.

Sometimes people narrowly avoid it but they’re still traumatized and the predator is still a danger.

Hurst has also claimed that his bill could deter pedophiles from targeting children, and reduce the number of child sex offenses taking place.

Yeah make them target adult women and make rape babies.

What trauma?

A woman only deserves legal protection and sympathy prior to age 13, right?

Also, if they can control who they target, it’s fully intentional, premeditated predation and the cure is a rope.

But Alabama attorney Raymond Johnson is among those who oppose it. He thinks existing punishments are sufficient. Johnson explained: ‘They’re going to challenge it under the 8th Amendment Constitution. ‘They’re going to claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment  for someone who has served their time and for the rest of there life have to be castrated.’

These people are subhuman and cannot be rehabilitated.

God never said such people could be pure, the sentence was death.

Sexual sadists are not fully human, the neuroscience is clear.

Man ‘found with 21 severed vaginas’ in his freezer appears in court

Castrate them – before they do it to you.

Sexual predators pretty much general criminals too

Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12616928

Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.

Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.

Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.

If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.

You’re probably a misogynist?

It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?

So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.

Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.

If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums. 

Impulse control is a choice.

Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.

My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.

Muh Dick is invalid.

r-types expose themselves

“It’s you, not me!”

spot the r-type is a fun game

slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil

first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage

next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog

lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever

muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills

When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.

“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil

Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.

Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.

 

Importing misogyny

Anti-white misogyny only.

They just can’t admit it openly.

I no longer trust “right-wing” news reporters, especially alternatives, because they completely missed out this viral video as the true reason France simply began to enforce its harassment law.

Fine, you lie and omit like the left, I won’t trust you like the left.

It doesn’t even have to be sexual harassment, people have a right to walk down the street in peace. It isn’t a strip club and both parties know the attention is an insult. Nobody has a right to take up your time or get your response. We’ve all been eased into this with comedians being cunts and calling it ‘a prank’ or with charity people on the street, in the UK they can’t legally come up to you anymore actually, begging is illegal. As harassment. They can’t even shake those donation tins, it’s coercion. Nothing to do with sex, just basic respect.

These little cowards wouldn’t dare be aggressive in public to men, they pick on the weaker sex like an animal. Notice he chose a lone, thin woman, who clearly couldn’t physically defend herself.

Why don’t most women risk dressing up anymore? Femininity is punished.

The First World must enforce its standards of decency and oppose this American lechery.

Hollywood’s been teaching these people lies.

White people don’t exist to please you. 

White men won’t pay you, white women won’t flirt with you. We don’t want you here, nobody asked you to come here.

Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

There’s no such thing as the female gaze

BUT I WISH THERE FUCKING WAS.

I demand more objectification of men in films to balance it out, it’s only fair.
If we’re going for hypersexualised entertainment, don’t leave straight women out.
If it makes straight men uncomfortable, they’re just gay. (No, really).

It’s sexist that women have to actually watch for the plot.

The plot of comic films is shit. I say that with love.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

Do it for the economy.

Source: “Eleven Little Roosters” by RoosterTeeth
https://roosterteeth.com/series/eleven-little-roosters

RESPOND TO DEMAND, HOLLYWOOD.

p.s. I am actually 100% serious.

Superman would’ve been a huge success as a series based on female viewers alone if he just wore a super codpiece. No heterosexual woman would deny this. You’d go. You’d hate yourself later, but you would.


Even Aquaman’s covering up, I am offended. Geeks wait decades for this zeitgeist.

It would’ve made Batman v Superman somewhat tolerable.

Captain Marvel might as well be Muslim with how much skin she doesn’t show, it’s stupid.

We all remember the kinky BDSM X-men uniforms. Those films were popular.