Da Wimminz

1,900 words. Good ones. Get a drink.

Only a weak man blames women for inaction.
A decent one knows the man should act for himself.

We could point out many things in a democracy, as a majority.

Considering most violent crimes are conducted by men, I don’t think you’d like it.

The broflakes are too sensitive.
Strangely, the ‘war on women’ has become real. The men who reject their role to lead society or defend anyone, even themselves, point to their genetic kin and cry ‘lazy’. Ah, projection.

It’s da wimminz fault!

No.

You still have to grow up, Peter Pan.
The libertarian arguments (and libertarianism) for multiculturalism/cheap labour, protrude from male corners. All-male corners. Your own sex betrayed you, and you betrayed yourselves in the cowardice to admit this fact.

Where to blame?

It’s either generational, for varying reasons of voting cycle and cultural change or it’s civic. Pro- or the anti-social. Men and women need one another to survive. You’re not just shooting yourself in the foot, but the balls.
Losers notwithstanding.
Men evolved on average for certain tasks, expecting them is not “gynocentrism”, pushed by a bitter Boomer divorcee, it’s the dimorphic specialization of evolutionary biology. It keeps society functional. Biology prefers the life-giving sex, before humans came along.

If you want gender roles, start with yourself.

So-called men say childbirth is nothing to a kick, but don’t want medical advances to do the easy job of growing and carrying to term. Uhuh. Easier than a pod though, isn’t it? Actually possible.

I notice men aren’t willing to bear and raise their own children. Too painful?
You might have to go out less with the boys? #lostboys
Stefan M seems pretty happy in his marriage, Elam’s just sore his marriage sucked. It sucked because he was the one who chose it, directed it (as the male party) and ruined it.

Like some people can’t drive, some people shouldn’t marry.

People treat pop culture like Bible studies too. That disturbs me. Fandom philosophy BS.
Crying into a camera won’t change the world. Teaching the truth about it… a formidable enemy. Truth does not equal conspiracy. We know how shitty this world is, we live here. What works, what came before, what was goodness and why.

You teach principles – logical/moral/legal/historical, you nag with opinions.
And don’t make the classic error of acting like America = Teh World.

Identity politics for men, white men especially, will never work.
Why? It’s like a poker player with the best hand complaining it could be better.
They’re spoiled brats. The Charlottesville lot in their gay little shorts weren’t working class were they? They weren’t out producing anything of worth to society (oh, that looks like the terrifying specter of hard work!). No women either, they didn’t forget they had obligations. Family > Race. (see end) You can’t help anyone unless you self-care and build up yourself as a rock first. You have no authority to draw upon. You’re like the trust fund baby champagne socialists of the left. Lazybones, the lot of yer.
Look around and grow some perspective you accuse everyone else of lacking.

1.It’s not about you.

2.Compared to everyone else, you’re doing really well. Crap is the new normal.

Why aren’t more women in politics? You don’t want us there?

You complain about suicide rates. Isn’t that a choice? Isn’t there a ‘retirement plan’ around that decision? If it’s so terrible, and you suddenly value the human soul, shouldn’t it be a crime again, along with abortion? Or is killing an unborn man acceptable?

You need to be consistent or don’t be shocked nobody listens.
What is the way to win here, for men and women? What do you actually want? How does a functional society operate? Envisaging oppression and systemic slavery of women to get hard about won’t work, has never been real (send proof otherwise), we’ll simply stop working, the economy will grind to a halt because most white women aren’t ghetto trash supporting 4 kids by 3 babydaddies. But for supporting ourselves, like adults, you still insult us. WTF do you want? To bitch. That’s all. Useless bitches.

Women in the workplace was fine, for many centuries. (nb. American history isn’t the only history for white people). The problems started with various types of immigration, which were and remain, largely male. If you’d side with a foreign man over white women, don’t pretend to care for “our” interests. Immigration drove wages down, if you look it up. Women were responsible for economic growth, including wage growth. At the very least, husbands could afford to work longer hours if they knew the woman was running the house, a form of labour. America wouldn’t have won WW2 if its women didn’t work. If a man wants to be a stay at home father because he’s good at it, an outlier, why not? Where is your meritocracy while you whine about freedoms?

Consistency! Your American Dreams for consistency!

Your Independence Day is a joke, your country went to the dogs after you booted out your white kin from power for a melting pot social experiment. ..Can a welfare-dogged society really be called independent?

Why are women statistically more clinically depressed? Men do not listen to reason.

That is the definition of stupid.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/stupid

Having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

Hiveminds stagnate. Don’t take on low IQ muh dicks or your movement dies.

Whataboutism re men is also invalid. It’s changing the subject, derailing is an indicator of someone without an argument. You don’t actually want to discuss problems women have, you expect them to magically go away if you ignore them, like the politicians we despise.

Common one?

Workplace deaths are higher, choosing dangerous fields higher, recklessness, higher.

#notanargument

Those are choices.

You are not soldiers, you are not coal-miners, you are ineffectual crybabies riding the coat-tails of your ancestors who can do nothing but whine like a snowflake that you’re too special to try like the rest of us (inc. women) and that, in spite of living in the Easiest Society Ever, in history, you have still failed to be an adult.

The problems of white women are also white problems, equally valid as the men’s.

You want our support? Ya gotta cooperate with the other members of your group.

Our mutual enemies delight in seeing white men throw their women under the bus. It’s probably a terrorist bus too. The group you need to survive is the one you should never turn on. If you’re a, what’s the term, “race traitor”, or if you’re a “genetic suicide”, you never cared, you just want a soapbox. Born with the other set of genitals, you’d be a fully paid up SJW.

Hm, why don’t women (the biologically, heavily investing sex) want to have children in the age of abusive/cheating/deadbeat husbands/fathers? In the anti-natal culture that offers abortion as soon as you’re told you’re pregnant because it’s assumed the father doesn’t want to raise it and lauds minors as fuckbuddies on the Pill whoring themselves out for drinks and impoverished mistresses known as ‘side chicks’? Before cuckoldry became a popular, pomo fetish, there were plenty of cuckqueans. Women didn’t like it much either. Yes, adultery is wrong! What was the demographic of the Ashley Madison hack again? Yes, it should be punished.

With harsher divorce laws. Why are you even allowed to re-marry when you broke a vow, you can’t renege on student loans but you can abandon your family? WTF is that America? Women file for divorce more often…. but why? The head of the house-hold is a failure. Go ahead, protect marriage. You’d be protecting everyone, but everyone includes women. If you hate/blame women that much, that makes us a scapegoat. Scapegoats are innocent by definition.

Who causes most of the problems, mathematically? You never ask that. Poor baby.

Never dare…

Sexual disgust is far higher in which sex? Women.

…So which sex is degenerate? Men.

Backed by, oh, I dunno, paraphilia studies? Pedophilia studies? Rape data? Basically all of the data we have? Continue to deny reality, because it hurts your egocentric quest to Fix the World without working on yourself and your atrocious impulse control.

Why don’t women with their heads screwed on wanna breed with a man who won’t Man Up?

It’s a MYSTERY, guys.

When men fail their role, women quit the game too! Astounding!

And, if men don’t owe women their finances if they don’t want to marry, why do women supposedly “owe” sex? And how pathetic is it to be a pity fuck, on the subject of ego-trips? An AA orgy for omega men too proud to just masturbate and accept they’re undesirable specimens. You want ladies, in society? Well, they won’t be your whores then, and if you expect otherwise, there’s something wrong with you. Standards do not a ‘bitch’ make. Be consistent.

Which came first, the men fucking around since time immemorial without adequate Biblical consequences, or the Sexual Revolution where more women did it too? Where was the mistake?

Double standards are meaningless. Societies collapse in chaos. If a rich man can shoot you but you can’t shoot him…. well…. isn’t that what’s happening? To interpret Darwin in bad faith is a naturalistic fallacy. Men are not like other animals, they are meant to control themselves.

On Peterson, the little troll.

Clean your room is misunderstood as a meme. Take responsibility when the fault lies with you. Women imitate the moral calibre of their men. You done fucked up, sons.

The meme you blindly love? I didn’t explain it on purpose before. Was funny watching idiots parrot it, oblivious to the fact it was intended for them.

It’s a reference to a proverb, well-known in England;

Sweep before your own door ~John Ray, English Proverbs, p. 135 (1678)
http://forum.quoteland.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/99191541/m/1151077311

translation.

You are responsible for yourself and those you take on (wife and kids, the commitment part??) not some weasel word saving the world bullshit. You can’t save jack shit if you can’t save yourself.

And hypothetically, in a thought experiment, let’s say women were weak, like children.

Is punching down at children acceptable in a civilized society? Ya feel manly?

Cucks are bad, cowards are worse. Men cause many of society’s problems and also are the sex to typically resolve them with society’s graces, historically. Sadly, tragically, historically.

We can deal with Sharia. We can deal with the cucks. [Is the average cuck male or female?]

The punishment for cowards, who knew better? Way worse.

It’s going to be much worse.

You want a model to protest on? Protest is a waste of time, you need to develop political power by actually building things first, but here:

One guy at a protest was counter-protesting in a suit and top hat. I think this was OWS. They knocked off his top hat, some random phag took it and you know how fast guys in fringed Afghan scarves can run. Anyway, the guy disappeared calmly round a corner and re-emerged, moments later, in a fresh, new top hat. Like nothing ever happened.

To this day, that BAMF is the smoothest protester I have ever heard of.

End – is there a generic “white race” or racial category for forensic subraces, plural?

But this is the thing – why should other white people listen to you when people can’t even agree on what they are? And should the genetic studies of countries like Britons be lumped in with the Italians? Sicilians??? There is a slight porous quality to whites, because of sex slavery for starters. There are subraces, in forensics e.g. Basque, Celt, whatever, and to overshoot into White only, denies that and denies the kin blood ties of direct family and the genome of the self. Perpetuation of a race is emergent, not deliberate, the human drive is close kin and the owned genome.

And if you won’t ensure your own survival and success, as a member of your group/race/nation, you cannot claim with any intellectual honesty to care about the rest of the population either.

You tailspin into ruin because you reject the majority of your allies.
The West isn’t a treehouse.

Aspergers actually male borderline personality disorder?

It is weird there’s a high-functioning category of a developmental disability.

You’d think that’s physically impossible if you, you know, have logic. Either you’re disabled or you aren’t.

Title for SEO.
I won’t even say anything, really, I’ll just link to some chew.
Minimal explanations.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7449446_Borderline_personality_disorder_and_Asperger_syndrome

Note: Aspergers no longer exists in America. It is no longer clinically recognized in the DSM, stripped of its own category status in the Fifth Edition into NOS, a misc. category. Suck on that first.

http://www.parents.com/health/autism/what-happened-to-aspergers/

A personality disorder would befit the high-functioning section, but the low-functioning would still classify as autism. It fits with features of NPD, BPD and ASPD.

http://aapel.org/asp/AGaspergerornotUS.html

We need studies on this.

http://aspertypical.com/2013/06/12/the-borderline-of-aspergers-the-similarities-between-borderline-personality-disorder-and-autism/

Can we double-blind it and still distinguish the two?

http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/207/5/392

Adolescents with ASD show high rates of callous–unemotional traits but, unlike in the general population, these are not strongly associated with conduct problems.

Google “successful sociopaths”

 Individuals with ASD have difficulty recognising emotions2 (although see Jones et al3) and understanding the mental states of others, also known as theory of mind,4 both of which are thought to contribute to problems in social functioning. Executive dysfunction is also reported in individuals with ASD, and may underlie restrictive and repetitive symptoms. Impairments occur on tasks of planning, response selection/monitoring and inhibition of pre-potent response in children5and adolescents,6 as well as reduced cognitive flexibility.7 With regard to common coexisting behavioural problems, individuals with ASD are at higher risk of co-occurring psychopathology.810Individuals with ASD display increased antisocial and aggressive behaviour as children11 and oppositional defiant disorder as adolescents

can’t recognize emotions in faces

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3086821/

repetition because they can’t learn from experience

https://news.yale.edu/2016/11/28/psychopaths-can-regret-bad-decisions-don-t-learn-them

narrow-mindedness/boldness

“Mental rigidity or thought addiction to rational thinking” – The Mask of Sanity, by Hervey Cleckley, one of psychopathy’s 16 qualities.

high risk of pathology

antisocial and aggressive as children

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955848/

acting up as teens

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796980

^things common to psychopaths

The explanatory role of attention–deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in the association between executive functioning and callous–unemotional traits is not well understood; controlling for ADHD has been reported to eradicate the relationship between executive functioning and delinquency in adolescents.

So there’s also a link from ADHD diagnosis and minors behaving like criminals.
Otherwise that’s a downright magical disappearing act. Jesus-tier.

 Individuals with ASD and those with callous–unemotional traits can sometimes present similarly, at least on a superficial level, yet this may be as a result of different aetiological processes. Despite phenotypic similarity, twin studies report largely independent genetic influences (an overlap of 0.43) on autistic and psychopathic traits

May?

And 0.43 is a moderately strong correlation!

43%!

Remember, this is ASD, not just Aspergers.

These studies suggest that some individuals with ASD also show callous–unemotional traits, perhaps as a result of a ‘double-hit’, with the emotional processes implicated in callous–unemotional being affected, in addition to the social cognitive difficulties typically present in individuals with ASD (for example theory of mind impairment). However, whether these findings hold in larger, population-based samples remains unexplored.

We test whether the strong association

wait wait wait
What happened to the blithe ‘largely independent’?

between these traits and conduct problems reported in the general population also applies to those with ASD, and describe additional psychiatric symptoms associated with callous–unemotional traits. Finally, we test whether a specific impairment in fear recognition is associated with callous–unemotional traits, as in non-ASD populations, and explore whether these traits are associated with difficulties in theory of mind and cognitive functioning.

Lower down
way down
Down to academic Hell.

There are two possible explanations for the remarkably high prevalence of callous–unemotional traits in our sample of adolescents with ASD.

Option 3 – you’re a filthy liar?

The dissociation of callous–unemotional from conduct problems in ASD may indicate a different cognitive underpinning. Alternatively, the sociocognitive difficulties associated with ASD may lead to reduced exposure to peers and prevent individuals from engaging in the more socialised and peer-related aspects of conduct-disordered behaviour.

Things that also apply to sociopaths for $100.

Clinicians have been concerned that some people with ASD appear to show high levels of callous–unemotional traits and the present study supports this clinical impression for a subset of individuals…. Parents, caregivers and other people working with individuals with ASD may require specific psychoeducation about these traits, which are often distressing to others but are not necessarily a predictor of antisocial behaviour.

Yeah, they don’t really love you, but it’s fine! They probably won’t attack you. (see bottom)
The clinicians are concerned but the parents should be happy to leave them alone around the knives.

https://www.autism.com/treating_self-injurious

Some children bite themselves and others, and hit other children and their parents with such violence they have broken bones.

autism speaks, but it also punches

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849991/

Differential diagnoses
  • ADHD
  • alexithymia
  • avoidant personality disorder
  • antisocial personality disorder
  • borderline personality disorder
  • narcissistic personality disorder…

Only a few studies to date have addressed the question of how late-diagnosed AS can be distinguished from its psychiatric comorbidities and differential diagnoses

$$$$$

Persons with AS are often highly educated and capable of living independently, yet half are unemployed and have a low socioeconomic status.

If I switched AS with psychopathy, it would fit better.

The differential diagnosis of AS includes schizoid, obsessive-compulsive, and avoidant personality disorders.

Back to the repetition common to all of these.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perseveration

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304146

Psychopaths love repeating stuff too.

The findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting potential contributions of frontotemporal structural deficits in neurocognitive impairment with perseveration in individuals with psychopathy.

http://www.alasbimnjournal.net/contenidos/frontal-and-temporal-lobe-dysfunction-in-autism-and-other-related-disorders-adhd-and-ocd-80

https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/125/7/1594/409313/Brain-anatomy-and-sensorimotor-gating-in-Asperger

The mean volume difference in combined grey matter deficit regions between Asperger’s and control groups was 16% (P < 0.001). No areas of excess grey matter volume were noted in people with Asperger’s syndrome.

Brain damage.

White matter deficits in subjects with Asperger’s syndrome were also extensive, but appeared to be concentrated in the left hemisphere (Fig. 3). The deficits extended fronto‐temporally,

Again, quoting.

frontotemporal structural deficits in neurocognitive impairment with… psychopathy”

Back to the high-functioning IQ bullshit

https://jneurodevdisorders.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1866-1955-5-14

Deficits in working memory are central to many theories of psychopathology, and are generally linked to frontal-lobe dysfunction. This article will review neuropsychological and (functional) brain imaging studies on working memory in adolescents with ASD. Although still disputed, it is concluded that within the working memory system specific problems of spatial working memory are often seen in adolescents with ASD. These problems increase when information is more complex and greater demands on working memory are made.

The most complex demand is an IQ test.

Connection? Widely known.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050565/

Furthermore, the reliable relationship between WM capacity and fluid intelligence was exclusively supported by the number factor (r = .66), while the resolution factor made no reliable contribution (r = −.05). Thus, the relationship between WM capacity and standard measures of fluid intelligence is mediated by the number of representations that can be simultaneously maintained in WM rather than by the precision of those representations.

Trans. obsession (resolution) counts for nothing.

https://www.livescience.com/g00/6519-simple-memory-test-predicts-intelligence.html

The high-functioning part is not IQ, it is the ability to live alone and work.

As in, not be functionally disabled.

Back to Aspergers and personality disorders.
If we study it directly –

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51551726_Personality_disorders_and_autism_spectrum_disorders_What_are_the_connections

Fifty-four young adults with a clinical diagnosis of Asperger syndrome were assessed with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders to evaluate the presence of a concomitant personality disorder and completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient to measure level of autistic features. Autism spectrum diagnosis was confirmed by Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders with a collateral informant. Approximately half of the study group fulfilled criteria for a personality disorder, all belonging to cluster A or C.

Next control for malingering because

Participants fulfilling criteria for a personality disorder showed more marked autistic features according to the Autism Spectrum Quotient. 

That is highly unlikely.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184447

Similar to ASC, BPD patients have elevated autistic traits and a strong drive to systemize, suggesting an overlap between BPD and ASC.

I am shocked.

Article over for titular purposes. Stay after dark if you’re hardcore.

Warning: this is random and only partially serious. The data is real.

*drum roll*

Magical mystery p-value tour!

Onto murder! The ultimate in violence!

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/my-life-aspergers/201212/asperger-s-autism-and-mass-murder

Reporters are saying the killer had Asperger’s Syndrome, a form of autism.  Every time a news story does that – by tying “killer” and “Asperger’s” in the same sentence – they are at some level implying that there is a connection between autism and mass murder.

There’s not.

Statisticians have a phrase for this situation:  Correlation does not imply causation.

Like Prozac suicides? Thanks, guy with Aspergers, for telling us objectively how safe you are.
http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is/pda.aspx Includes compulsive lying.

https://autism-help.org/behavior-manipulative-autism.htm

Please understand if I don’t take your word for it, it’s like asking a fat person how much they ate.

Let me just google it and see if there’s any news.
Since observational studies count and we need an example.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/family-autistic-girl-murdered-teen-11258478

The murder of a teenage girl by a fellow care home resident obsessed by necrophilia could have been prevented, an inquiry has found.

Yes, direct infusions of lead are very preventative.

Melissa Mathieson, 18, was strangled by Jason Conroy in 2014 at Alexandra House in Bristol, a home supporting people with autistic spectrum disorder.

Conroy, who once tried to strangle a teacher so he could abuse her, planned to drag the teenager’s body back to his room and have sex with her.

He had also attempted to kill his mother by putting a duvet over her head for the same reason.

That’s three victims attempted minimum.
Why are creepy rapists and killers not raising any eyebrows when they’re white? Anyone?

About the statistical significance requirement…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/05/21/study-finds-significant-portion-of-mass-murderers-and-serial-killers-had-neurological-disorders-including-autism/

Murderers are crazy and water is wet.

new study in the journal Aggression and Violent Behavior will likely fuel the debate even more. It found some mass murderers and serial killers have something in common: autism and head injury. Like Lanza, other killers had an inability to connect socially, spoke in flat monotones, and had emotionless features.

Researchers call it the first review of published accounts of what causes people to commit mass murder. They said: “Our findings tentatively indicate that these extreme forms of violence may be a result of a highly complex interaction of biological, psychological and sociological factors and that, potentially, a significant proportion of mass or serial killers may have had neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder or head injury.”

Since you can’t rehab these people, where is the hangman?
The necrophilia man will be released. Before his 30th birthday.

The director of the United Kingdom’s National Autistic Society’s Centre for Autism reacted to the study with caution. “We would urge people not to jump to conclusions about people with autism and to make judgements about a whole section of society,”

because we want to keep the gravy train a-chugging and we’re completely objective.

Nonetheless, “the findings were surprising,” researcher Allely, who holds a PhD in psychology, said in a phone interview. “There was a higher percentage of autism [among serial killers] than in the general population.”

Maybe don’t blame the meds just yet.

The research examined a population of 239 killers who had murdered at least three people since 1985, when there was a dramatic increase in the recognition of autism. Of that number, 133 of the mass killers did not appear to suffer from any neurological disorder, but a “significant proportion” did: 28 percent had “definite, highly probable or possible” autism, while 21 percent had sustained a “definite or suspected head injury.” 

28% is well above the required level of significance.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223980.2016.1175998

The irrationality of this paper merits inclusion alone.

How much is it a factor? BUT It isn’t real BUT it could be BUT it is.

Data!

There are 73 mass shooting events but there are two events where there is a pair of shooters which meant that 75 mass shooter cases were investigated. This exercise tentatively suggests evidence of ASD in six of 75 included cases (8%) which is about eight times higher when compared to the prevalence of ASD found in the general population worldwide (motherjones.com). The 8% figure for individuals with ASD involved mass killings is a conservative estimate. In addition to the six cases which provide the 8% figure, there were 16 other cases with some indication of ASD. Crucially, ASD may influence, but does not cause, an individual to commit extreme violent acts such as a mass shooting episode.

Influence without a cause people.

That makes complete sense.

I am sold with buttons on.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16604294

Nothing to see.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710161/

No misdiagnosis, no Siree.

It’s a risk, but don’t be worried.

There’s a built-in excuse that they’re not really stalking you because you’re their “obsessive interest”, don’t be concerned, women.
http://www.wtsglobal.com/autism-spectrum-disorder-and-violence/

He didn’t realize when he should not bring up his interest in murder. He might fall into the category of the “incompetent suitor” on the Stalking Risk Profile assessment guide12 – usually harmless but causing genuine concern and requiring limit setting. Legal consequences could follow if the behaviors persist. When given feedback these individuals may be confused, feel frustrated, hurt, or remorseful. Their genuine social naïveté may be apparent to evaluators. In this case the student received ongoing psycho-education and coaching about proper conduct so as to minimize the risk of impulsive outbursts if rebuffed and frustrated, and to reduce the likelihood of others reacting negatively. His progress and conduct continued to be appropriately monitored. A comprehensive risk assessment and explanation to campus officials avoided his being perceived and treated as a potential homicidal stalker.

As a woman, fuck no.

I’m not responsible for some random’s sexual entitlement.

If only we had a technical term for this acknowledged with a link to Aspergers cases.

http://article.scholarena.co/A-Conceptual-Analysis-of-Individuals-with-an-Autism.pdf

Homicidal ideation is that term.

“They made the decision to use violence as a means of resolving their issues”

It goes on to discuss premeditation and planning. Nothing like a psychopath, clearly.

https://treato.com/Autism,Homicidal+Ideation/?a=s

That includes discussing murder in slavish detail.

http://card-usf.fmhi.usf.edu/docs/resources/CARD_ASDMH_Brochure092109.pdf

page 3

Immediately refer to a trained professional
any student who screens positive
for suicidal or homicidal ideation.

If only we had a study

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0306624X15612719?journalCode=ijoe

Five cases of young Italian men with Asperger syndrome and recurrent and extremely violent femicide fantasies are presented. While there is no direct correlation between autism spectrum conditions and violence, as other humans, persons with an autistic condition are capable of committing crimes, including homicide. All five had in common a number of characteristics and behaviors felt to be pathoplastic: All had been bullied, all had been romantically rejected, all were long-standing First Person Shooter (FPS) game players, and all were avid violent pornography consumers.

Wow it’s like the average MGTOW or MRA forum.
I need a study on that.

Because the adequate, mature response to No is murder and necrophilia.
These people are the reason feminists still hold sway over the population.
If they disappeared, there’d be nothing to oppose. People who see you as subhuman because they want to fuck you? Probably not firing on all cylinders themselves.
Psychology is dark and if you disagree and haven’t read enough.

Not respecting the humanity of the person saying No – proves them correct to reject you (you’re unsuitable) and gives First World Feminism something to point at. Congratulations, you’re stupid on multiple levels.

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/recovering-narcissist/2017/09/are-male-narcissists-also-misogynists/

Bitchier than gay men.

Are male narcissists more likely to be misogynistic?study suggests that heterosexual narcissistic men tended to lash out more often at heterosexual women than any other group (including homosexual men and women). Dr. Keiller (2010), lead author of the study, writes:

The present study suggests that heterosexual men’s narcissism is linked to an adversarial and angry stance toward heterosexual women more than toward other groups. Although narcissists may want to maintain feelings of superiority and power over all people, narcissistic heterosexual men are particularly invested in subordinating heterosexual women.

Of course they can’t cooperate, low empathy. They’re broken so they project it and act out. Projection is aggressive.

  • There is an established connection between misogynistic attitudes towards women and homicide against women (Campbell, 1981).

Duh?

Many male mass murderers have also been shown to have a history of domestic violence against women.

They’d call that training.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/resolution-not-conflict/201511/narcissism-or-aspergers-how-would-you-diagnose-these-cases

It is narcissistic to feel entitled to attention from others, including sexual attention. Stop being a whore.

It is narcissistic (specifically solipsistic) to assume your problem should be (other person’s) problem e.g. Women You Wanna Fuck.
This Venn is oddly irrational from the supposed High IQ overlords. They have no problem rejecting women they don’t want to fuck personally, and expect this is their solemn right to do so – but crudely, harshly and without comeuppance. Because female entitlement is the only problem?
The strangest aspect of these femicide rampages is how they believe it makes their ’cause’ appear worthy.

What cause?

Misogyny can be manifested in numerous ways, including social exclusionsex discriminationhostility,

androcentrismpatriarchymale privilege,

that line tough to define

belittling of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification.

Bolded is the stuff they can’t really deny. None of those are prosocial. All of those bolded are evil, as in, they do not occur in a healthy, high-trust society. You have no intellectual philosophy, there is no cause. You don’t even use scientific terms like hypergamy or philosophical solipsism correctly.

We know you’re worthless r-types. Fuck it or kill it or both, we knew. It’s your reason for existence, your raison d’être. How deranged must you be to possibly think that makes you look good? Cavemen were more civilized, we have forensic evidence. You’re not reconnecting with anything. Ancient men weren’t monsters, in sum. What, like women aren’t going to take even more precautions from anyone who vaguely blips on our creepdar? How do you think empathetic people, including normal women, work?

They’ll be more scared – they say on their forums, with the narc’s gleeful thought at another’s suffering.

….Will this result in less sex and a worse reputation or the reverse?

Nobody will ever respect you because you have never ever earned it.
There is no Man Card, you are not auto-worthy of respect because phallic symbol? Freud would’ve laughed you out of the room. It’s individual, it has nothing to do with sex. You earn respect, not your sex for you. That’s such a passive feminine way of looking at it too. More than feminine, effete, it’s perverted femininity. Like the gay pride people who humiliate themselves and still expect you’ll respect them after viewing the assless studded leather chaps in public.
What is going on over there, America? You used to be cool. Now you’re famous for these morons.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201710/new-way-understand-the-narcissistic-male

You choose to be grandiose and act like a loser (psychopaths are not cool IRL).
You’ll meet their fate.

Bible called it;

The LORD tests the righteous and the wicked, And the one who loves violence His soul hates.

For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption

Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.

As I have seen, those who plow iniquity and sow trouble reap the same.

I guess you could call it karma too.

Coddling them is inappropriate, they know what they’re doing and enjoy hurting others, especially wider abstract society. They fully deserve all they get, in that case.
Outsiders get no sympathy.

‘Member hostility in that misogyny list?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/insight/201011/bad-karma-is-real

 The reason they do is that chronic hostility causes both a constriction of the arteries and more blood being pumped to the heart, causing small tears in the arteries. Cholesterol and fat then attach to those tears, which can ultimately cause heart attacks [1]. Chronic hostility also has been linked to long-term elevations in white blood cells, which has been clearly associated with heart disease [2].

In a fascinating study, researchers followed the health of a group of medical students for 25 years to see if their levels of angry hostility at the beginning of the study could predict their heart disease rates down the road [3]. Incredibly, those participants who were highest in angry hostility at the beginning were 5 times more likely than their laid-back counterparts to have heart disease 25 years later.

Type As are not alpha, they’re just dead.

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/10/karma.aspx

Social reciprocity outweighs any posturing dominance bullshit.
It’s almost like being selfish is stupid in a social species?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androcentrism

There’s far more evidence for male bias, isn’t there? As in, there is actually evidence, unlike gynocentrism, which clutches at straws with rhetoric and emotional appeal.

 

Empathy in dating women

Higher EQ, maybe listen.

Guys, Here’s What It’s Actually Like To Be A Woman

Plenty of this is factually false like calling hook-ups “short term mating” to feel less like a manwhore, when that term refers to producing children, from a brief courtship, then abandonment and nothing else. Hence the mating part. It also assumes a man can understand women when you’d never see this article written the other way around, women are too sensitive to be that obnoxious. However, the physical risk is medical and true. Anyway, the fact it exists shows up a huge problem men used to understand: modern men lack empathy. They’re broken on it, defective in feeling and displaying it. They don’t even care for their country, family, one another or themselves. There’s a general callousness. It doesn’t come from women.

Minor note: Scientific misogyny is actually worse, because it deceives (everyone). Using big words and bluffing the findings won’t make you right. We still don’t live in that world. Anyone saying it’s easy doesn’t understand.

Women don’t really discuss their everyday problems because they are so common.

Either we expect to get disbelieved, told we should adopt male feelings (we’re not gay and that’s actually a good category argument for mansplaining) or the ever-present fear of harm. Not just physical harm but reputation damage (men gossip and it is vindictive), emotional harm from insults because broflake throws a mantrum and can’t handle rejection, those sort of things.

Confidence isn’t what they want, they want to act conceited and have everyone roll out the red carpet for their entitled ass. It doesn’t happen, narcissistic rage does. Do you want to be on the receiving end of that, for the crime of having a nice ass?

If it’s so scary to talk to the opposite sex (no), you wouldn’t do it. Nobody is forcing you. That’s your gender role and your personal expectations, nothing to do with women. Don’t blame us. We don’t want strangers coming up to us, and in my culture it used to be partially illegal and socially deeply frowned upon. Edwardian women used to be able to beat men with umbrellas for insulting our dignity, there was one newspaper clipping, and they’d frequently wear those gigantic hat pins to stab men on the Transport who got too fruity. Self-defence, legal as a gun should be.

The expectation women should think like men and men are objectively correct on the wholly subjective subject of feelings (not to mention another autonomous human being’s, the definition of possessive) is the reason a lot of those dating guru types are forever alone. Not just single but actively repellent. It’s gaslighting, like the friendzone fraud who keep trying to repeat until she gives in: you want me, I’m best for you, you’ll never do better. Well, that’s her decision and considering you only want her body, you’re averse to putting a ring on it and all you wanna do is bad things to it, you are totally wrong on all counts.

Women don’t work like that.

Again, I have to painstakingly explain this every time the subject of women comes up, you cannot ask a man how women think and assume he’s correct, you can’t even do that with a single woman, there’s a range of normal. Anecdotal fallacy, please stop.

Women don’t work like that.

They are not the same.

This is good, this is fine, this is biological.

Yet the idiots claim women are just as lustful as men, if not more (ignore the rarity of male hookers) and cannot be trusted (look at abuse and crime stats, just look).

With exceptional cognitive dissonance, they go on to say women are aliens and need to be treated in various subhuman ways because it isn’t abuse if they secretly like it, according to the abuser?

On a purely intellectual and logical basis, they are full of shit.
That’s the mindset and behaviour of a misogynist (and yes, the sexes reverse).
Simplest explanation? Occam’s Razor?
The men who are bad with women never consider the fact the entire sex is seeing them clearly and they are in fact bad. Bad prospects, bad at being men and bad suitors. We evolved for this, we evolved to spot this and swerve. All that shit you complain about, the coldness to a total stranger, lying about having a boyfriend, fake numbers and names, the flaking, it’s to get enough distance so by the time the rejection kicks in you can’t kick us. This is good and sensible and right, you’re a spoiled entitled brat if you expect random women to just trust you, randomly. Trust takes years to develop. Instead they say whatever’s convenient to their feelings (actually ego, they don’t really have feelings that aren’t self involved), because the probability of getting punched by a man you rejected (it happens) is totally the same as hearing a word you needed to hear a long time ago and will never take for an answer.

If you don’t respect no, you’ll never hear a real Yes.

This is your fault, as instigator and then disrespecting the etiquette involved in trying to chat someone up.

In an era of acid attacks for rejection and shootings for pathetic scum like Elliot, women are right to avoid men until further notice. Nobody is entitled to approval. Nobody is entitled to respect, but in public, there is a line, there is a wall everybody deserves to be respected, the perimeter of personal space.

Women approaching other women in public is weird and even that isn’t sexual. We made it illegal for charity workers to harass us in public so no, Nice Guy act won’t work.

Women are not like porn. Porn stars themselves need to be paid to act like that. Even they aren’t like that. You’d think this is obvious, but no.

They never treat men like dirt by the way, because they know they’d get hit if they talked all that shit.

If women catch onto this intellectually, there’s apparently something wrong with us.

Nope, you all look dumb, and it’s nothing to do with us. Stop acting black and pull your pants up.
They never mention all those workplace deaths are typically hubris.
Better known as vainglory.

Look at the long term mate choice studies.
What do women want? Empathy. (Search terms conscientiousness and agreeableness, yes, ALL women, huge studies).

What do you refuse to develop? Empathy. You have only yourselves to blame and no, a ‘condition’ doesn’t change the facts. You can develop coping mechanisms to be considerate, you just don’t want to, you don’t see the point. Aspergers for example, is about as bad as sociopathy. We don’t have to sign up for that. You are not a child to mind. You need the basics down.

What do people have in scant amounts for you? Empathy. They can sense you don’t give a shit about them so why bother? It’s the golden rule, not that you’re smart enough to see the flipside, making rape jokes and wondering why nobody trusts you don’t spike your drinks.

Update: See this guy?

https://www.indy100.com/article/woman-summed-up-why-men-never-understand-female-twitter-flowers-address-7987681

Don’t be this guy. The one pretending a creepy man is just being ‘nice’.
Why are the dumbest men so cocky? What are you feeding them America?

The one completely missing the point that stalkers can and do rape and kill. A gay man should’ve asked for comparison.

Which causes more damage in society, the errant pen or the stupid penis?

Male narcissism and misogyny

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/recovering-narcissist/2017/09/are-male-narcissists-also-misogynists/

So many studies, so little patience.

Yes, a core trait of inferiority.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/link-inferiority-the-opposite-of-genius/

It isn’t a complex, if it’s a fact.

Logically, you cannot feel threatened by an outgroup if you are secure. So either they are insecure or lying about who’s the superior sex. Bears don’t have to tell racoons they’re bigger.

Link: Is the Gender War driven by women or Jews?

https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/feminism-a-jewish-psyop-to-demonize-white-women/

And still, in the comments, men denying responsibility for their own actions, including omission, while women are to blame for things that happened decades or centuries ago.

Sure.

But men lead, right?

Stop with the false dichotomies, dammit.

Men vs Women IS the SJW paradigm of Gender Wars. To destroy both.

To destroy both by pitting either one against the other.

So women against men.

Equally bad as men against women.

Speak the truth and shame the Devil.

They now admit this goal with ‘gender is over’ and ‘gender is dead’ and everyone as androgynous propaganda. They admit it and supposed red-pill men cover their ears because… a white woman is talking.

Do you even want women to exist?

If your first impulse to “women are harassed” is to harass them, they’re right!

Yeah, we’re not aligned at all because you’re clearly not on our side and do actually hate us. Actions > Words. It’s a modicum of basic human decency, simple respect for libertarian humanity. At least the feminists pretend to listen and pretend to care.

Les Dame Blanches, at your service. If women were devils, we wouldn’t be having this conversation because your mother would’ve aborted you. How about you equally divide the expectations and standards between parents, rather than Blame Mommy (Figures) Forever, which is no more complex than the Sexual Revolution’s counterpart.

Independent people aren’t so bloody entitled. We aren’t mummy or whore. You aren’t daddy or bank account. Welcome to adulthood. All those layers of capital – social, intellectual, emotional, erotic, financial, are signs of success and maturity, not hypocritical.

Who are you going to reproduce with? And if you don’t want to reproduce, you don’t really get an opinion. You’re as anti-natal as the Pill-pushers but I guess it’s the narcissism of small differences.

Misogyny is very simple to describe in practice: blaming women for everything bad.

That’s pagan, that’s Pandora.

(This also works reversed, duh).

Simple question: are women easily led and can we be led astray?

That’s the question about whether it’s possible.

This is being logical.

Try swallowing – your pride. You are probably at least a little bit wrong on any huge subject.

The fake male co-founder

https://www.fastcompany.com/40456604/these-women-entrepreneurs-created-a-fake-male-cofounder-to-dodge-startup-sexism

That is one interesting social experiment.

To state the obvious.

Misogynistic men only trust other men with their money.

It’s wrong but they have every right, because it’s their money.

The Chinese rent white men for their privilege.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/06/29/china.rent.white.people/index.html

Studies have shown competence is assumed where it is undeserved.

Blame stock images IDK.

Such men consistently over-estimate their competence.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-28/confessions-of-a-confident-mediocre-man/8562708

Surely it’s the arrogance effect? In the modern world we call this vice a virtue.

“a natural tendency to overrate their past performance on maths tasks by 30 per cent”

It’s terrifying how many men rate themselves as good at maths and then I have to explain 12yo level shit.

This finding is old. There are also far more compulsive liars in the male group, which somewhat explains it. In their minimizing terms, this is bluffing, like lying on a CV (illegal).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

OLD.

These people are the reason we blind exams. These people.

Like Is she flirting? studies all over again. Men don’t really do meta-cognition, by comparison.

This is why we have all the psychometrics. Either you can do it or GTFO.

The masculine traits are the capitalist ones: taking risks, being rude or arrogant, stepping on others, ruthless ambition, Crusaderism, many that are probably antisocial if not tempered by other stuff.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12848221

“A meta-analysis of 45 studies of leadership styles showed that women tend to exhibit many of the character traits associated with effective leadership — such as effective communication, a tendency to empower subordinates, and creative problem solving — and are more likely to adopt effective leadership styles than men.”

They’re selecting the cocky guy who relies on underlings to do his work for him. No wonder so many companies are tanking. Everyone, male or female, hates them. They’re drains, they parasite off the productive. A minority in every group or company do the bulk of the work, remember.

The problem is seeing masculinity as successful without anything to back it up on the project.

We need to upgrade our primal brain that says this man is leading us into battle.

Another part of the problem is seeing everything as gendered.

So there’s no Scientists trying to make the world a better place. Yay!

There’s male scientists trying to make the world a better place.

….

OK, everyone else go home and fuck the cure for cancer?

Like, what do you hope to achieve here? Rah-rahing your pompoms for part of the group?

Why do they have to do that? Ruin everything?

Supposedly, accounting for this bias statistically (with mathematical models and quotas) makes companies more efficient and meritocratic.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/workplace-gender-quotas-incompetence-efficiency-business-organisations-london-school-economics-lse-a7797061.html
“Quotas can work to weed out incompetent men.”

Everyone should be overjoyed by that.

Less stupid people with power, who cares if they have a banana or fig down there?
You’d have to be really insecure to identify strongly with someone who shares a single pair of chromosomes.

HBR has noted incompetent men being promoted on the basis of bravado is an issue for companies.
https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men
Bravado and popularity over actual performance metrics.

http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/men-and-women-biased-about-studies-stem-gender-bias-opposite-directions/
“The new study’s authors reasoned that men especially might devalue the evidence because it threatens the legitimacy of their status in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields. Men might also be critical because of prior beliefs that gender bias is not a problem in STEM.”
But they’re proving any bias by believing that female competence is a fairytale.
Those women take exactly the same exams.
Oh, it hurts their ego? Broflakes.

“Men rated the research quality of the abstract less favorably than did women in both samples. This gender gap was especially large for STEM faculty, potentially suggesting that evidence of bias might threaten men in STEM seeking to retain their status.”
“When reading these results, a male scientist might think, “oh my gosh…if we’re going to fix this equality issue, that almost necessarily means that there’s going to be fewer opportunities for men,” said Ian Handley, lead author of the new PNAS paper and associate professor of psychology at Montana State. Handley suggested that discounting evidence more likely reflects a subtle, unconscious process than overt sexism.”
Read Freud, there’s no subtle.
They just lie about it.
The depressing thing is that STEM helps everyone and there’s literally a shortage of talent.
We can’t afford to lose any talent.
People who took it for the money though, can fuck right off.

“This mixed literature tempers the paper’s claims about strong gender bias. But obviously, the paper’s central goal was not to systematically review literature on gender bias, but rather to present studies of reactions to evidence of bias.”
“Based on the best current data, remaining challenges include sexual harassment, bias in teaching evaluations and science mentoring, and gender stereotypes about innate genius and creativity.”
That last one is part of the Genius Famine.

Women can’t be the ‘crazy’ sex and also suddenly the less creative one when studies show they’re linked.

“The new PNAS study shows that men, on average, are less likely to believe this evidence of gender bias where it exists. And that’s a concern, considering men are the current majority of STEM professors. But it’s also a concern if the evidence of gender bias is overhyped. Overhyped claims could make these fields unattractive to women or even make people less likely to believe evidence of bias when it does exist.”

Be honest in science, the musical.

Link: Men explain things to me

https://www.guernicamag.com/rebecca-solnit-men-explain-things-to-me/

I did have a post explaining the real features of mansplaining but I need to find it to post it. At least I doubt I posted it. It’s hard to keep track. This will be blunt for the spergs.

You’re not holding court if the other party hates you and wants to leave.

I have never seen a woman do it. We keep out. It seems a male feature, especially a bitchy gamma male type. Internet bitch fights between guys. Think the atheist talking about sky fairies when nobody asked.

When men do it to other men, which is uncommon, they’re just called jerks.
There should really be a term for this behaviour though.

It’s toxic, it’s antisocial and it’s ignorant to think a conversation is an excuse to chop the other party down.
You can say someone’s wrong if you think, but there’s a respectful adult, mature way, and then the way where you make them never want to speak to you again and act like it’s their fault you’re an ass.

Also a favourite with the guys who complain of being friendzoned. They’re normally not friends but acquaintances.
I insult her! I demean her! I disrespect her! Why won’t she date me? I’m such a Nice Guy!

Really they’re passive aggressive and blow hot and cold while thinking they’re being smouldering and mysterious.

One of the assumptions is that a woman, despite credentials, has no idea what she’s talking about (even as she’s teaching you the thing, thereby proving it) or randomly invalidating their opinion purely because they’re a woman (that’s just sexist, like when SJWs dismiss men on that basis).

Opinions don’t need to be right.

 

So the bloviating moron just rattles off his opinion like a fact glibly and expects the presumably ditzy girl to be sexually impressed. And that’s the worst part, they think cocky is sexy.

No woman fancies House.

None.

Have you noticed that?

…Why do you do this?

It’s the shittiest flirting tactic known to man.

Look how smart I am! they think they’re signalling.

Look how obnoxious I can be! women see.

You are not at work and you’re not the boss there either, so you couldn’t bully people like that at work. If you did bully work inferiors, they’d leave. If you’re mean when you’re trying to be ‘nice’ on first meeting, imagine what an asshole they think you are once they get to know you, who wants to? Really it’s the bottom rungs of men who do this because negative attention is better than none, they’re already unattractive but this makes it hard to look past because there isn’t even inner beauty or some sympathy.

Woman thinks:

Why should I be nice and carry you in this conversation? Next!

It’s this alpha posturing BS going round. The old term for this? False bravado.

It’s fake as those thots’ nails. Pretending it’s about the intellect doesn’t make you less superficial than a guy in a tight tank top, you’re still being vain. It’s a false image of leadership. Who is inspired by catty comments?

There’s a sexual element where it’s like negging but instead of appearance or something superficial like a laugh or posture, they’re dehumanizing you. It’s the dehumanization part that rings true to regular, non-SJW women and made this such a Thing, thanks to EQ. I’ve had men on here try to deny women’s EQ when there are plenty of studies, since the idea of women being good/better at anything triggers them to their tiny fragile peanut balls, but then go on to say women are too sensitive. ….like -how? How does your brain keep you alive when it’s so dumb?

They’re patronizing but in doing so, demonstrating their stupidity. If the woman defends herself, let alone fighting fire with fire? He gets really offended and maybe calls her a sexist bitch.

ugh.

You don’t take the time (SQ) to explain something for free only for the ingrate to turn around and begin implying that, because they don’t like what you say, you have no right to say it.. also because you have tits. Ironically they talk about freedom of speech constantly…. yeah, they just mean their speech. So you can’t punch them for being jerks….

That was April 2008 and it struck a chord.  It still seems to get reposted more than just about anything I’ve written at TomDispatch.com, and prompted some very funny letters to this site. None was more astonishing than the one from the Indianapolis man who wrote in to tell me that he had “never personally or professionally shortchanged a woman” and went on to berate me for not hanging out with “more regular guys or at least do a little homework first,” gave me some advice about how to run my life, and then commented on my “feelings of inferiority.”

Don’t be this guy.

If it’s something a nosy old woman might say, don’t.
Hearing something you don’t like isn’t a personal insult.

Don’t make it personal.

He thought that being patronized was an experience a woman chooses to, or could choose not to have–and so the fault was all mine. Life is short; I didn’t write back.

the way someone else speaks to you is THEIR fault

they are the responsible one for their tongue

even being wrong isn’t a provocation

it’s a learning opportunity

a bonding opportunity

or maybe that’s my EQ talking

not a bitchy high horse shade-throwing competition

cause?

straight men are acting gay

to attract women

it puts off women

homosexual men do this

that’s why they do it

they always did this

look at Oscar Wilde!

Young women subsequently added the word “mansplaining” to the lexicon. Though I hasten to add that the essay makes it clear mansplaining is not a universal flaw of the gender, just the intersection between overconfidence and cluelessness where some portion of that gender gets stuck.

arrogance

empty arrogance

nothing between the ears

literally no self-awareness, like, autistic levels but no autism

It’s like being nagged but about something you don’t need to do, by someone who acts like they know you and has no idea what they’re talking about. They seek you out and maybe corner you and trap you with a question to make it look less like bullying.

to the sincere fools:

you can’t banter until there’s a bond

Busybodies is too archaic a term. The worst were crotchety old men. At least the women would feed you and it wasn’t about sex.

The funniest are when any woman who uses this word gets mansplained by a broflake guy who says he’s never seen or done it.

It’s a thing you do, that’s why the word is used.
It just isn’t always directed at women, but when it is, there’s a significantly patronizing power dynamic imbalancing tone, regardless of the actual status of individuals involved.

The other cause? Smartphones.

They can’t hold a conversation anymore, we blame the internet.

Then there’s the sociopathic nutjobs-

On two occasions around that time, I objected to the behavior of a man, only to be told that the incidents hadn’t happened at all as I said, that I was subjective, delusional, overwrought, dishonest–in a nutshell, female.

That’s misogyny and gaslighting.

You are woman, therefore must be <character insult>, it’s defamation.
Men used to hold their tongue in days of dueling.

The craziest ones you’ll ever see think they’re playing Freud and can sit judging all women as inferior because they imagine a fetish of theirs, daddy issues (plot twist: because they have the daddy issues) and begin seeing insanity or dishonesty everywhere… because they need a shrink themselves. Put down the schoolgirl/teacher porn!

Men explain things to me, still. And no man has ever apologized for explaining, wrongly, things that I know and they don’t.

that’s the virtue of humility

let me end with

Surely one of these men has died of embarrassment, but not nearly publicly enough.