Are the supposed beta males really fools?

Going by the manosphere label for K-selected men for expedience.

Think about it. Think about it from the perspective of game theory.

What do they do?

Well, they try to become husband material. Become a good provider, well-rounded man. Stuff that appeals to the future mother of their children. Low time preference qualifiers. They develop themselves into men.

Meanwhile, the r-types are off distracting themselves and ruining themselves in entirely different places (usually clubs) with meaninglessness (sex, drugs, drinking, bragging). This also takes the short-term women out of the picture too. They’re off in the same places. The SMP.

What does that leave?

All these young, fine marriage prospects of women. At their age, other men won’t give them a second look, wanting to have their fun first. In the MMP, a man is rare, and a young one with his life in order too. He has enhanced status and can snap up his pick of the ladies, within reason. She’s young and he gains the most years from her. There is a choice so there can be love.

This takes her out of the market and the single dating pool that cad types will be fishing in later. When they wonder where all the best fish have gone.

It doesn’t seem so dumb from their perspective.

Frankly, it seems quite genius.

I am rarely impressed yet once in a blue moon

Which laws kept marriages intact?

It is easy to say the modern legal system is unfair, unjust and the various issues with it are causing the social breakdown we know too well. Here are some of the laws which kept the sexes in line, and marriage thereafter. Their loss has caused recognisable problems.

To avoid players or lying cads promising marriage to good women

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_promise

To prevent gossip by competition, especially where truthful

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_confidence

To prevent bitter rivals (possibly male) or spinsters dissolving a union once made

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienation_of_affections

To promote emotional intimacy and the ‘dependency paradox’ vital for a permanent relationship

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy

The spouse should become the centre but not the whole Universe. Family business and home matters don’t leak to outsiders who twist the knife while things are down (natural ups and downs) and never let a good time go without passive-aggression.

Includes land law in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtilage

For an obligation of honesty going into marriage – “freely offered” – they know what they’re getting into

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation

Prenuptial agreements should be legally binding I really don’t see the point otherwise. It misrepresents the litigant as not a gold-digger and then they can turn around and say “it doesn’t count, I didn’t mean it”?

This is widely applicable from many parties and SJWs do this for monstering, bring it back with criminal libel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light

Most vital of all, this ensures sexual fidelity in BOTH parties as agreed in their vows, reduces cuckoldry to nil and guarantees financial support between parties (not paid out to mistresses or bastard children).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conversation

The tort of criminal conversation seeks damages for the act of sexual intercourse outside marriage, between the spouse and a third party. Each act of adultery can give rise to a separate claim for criminal conversation.

This values the commitment. Dollar value. Bring it back.

It’s a matter of time until the feminists bring back

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seduction_(tort)

for men who lie to get sex (like, all 99.999% of them).

Protection from adultery is the crucial means of safeguarding marriage for future generations. Without this, what is the point? Nobody forces you to make a commitment in this century, the choice should have legal weight on both sides. The K-types care about marriage and must protect their mating strategy from predatory r-types, either as their spouse or the cheating third party. Marriage must be inoculated from the ravishes of the sexual marketplace.

 

If a man could have a sexbot, why would he want a woman?

http://www.reaxxion.com/9735/how-virtual-reality-could-destroy-western-society

Blatantly obvious question to a person with common sense.

Men primarily desire sex, women primarily desire emotional comfort.

You can see women awakening to this discrepancy in their reaction to male sex toys. Oh, theirs are “empowering” but men’s are “gross”….

no what I don't believe it can't be true disbelief pushing daisies

Futurists are sci-fi psychics. If they ever had any prognostic powers, they’d be designing and inventing what they foresaw. It’s highly pop-culture-based guesswork, they slavishly follow trends.

Men on the whole do not desire a woman for reproduction until a certain age or unless they’re broody by character (rather rare and commendable) – they want the appearance of it, the sex act itself, like women want the appearance of a high-quality Alpha (and rarely consider genetic fitness). Evolution is deceptive. It tells us we want A because it is the means to acquire B. Evopsych studies the divide between what we want as an organism and how our mind tricks us into getting it against our better judgement.

The brain is an organ dedicated to self-deception.

Look no further than optical illusions for demonstrations.

Women presume their true value to men (fecundity) compels their desire. In some men, perhaps this is true. On the whole, men are driven by the same superficial concerns as women – the mating markets are designed to make snap judgements so as not to lose opportunity (all those studies about how quickly we assess mate potential, it isn’t the conscious mind doing it in split seconds, is it?)