Non-white births down in America

The sky isn’t falling you fecking idjits.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fertility-is-declining-the-most-among-minority-women

[Marriage is also a factor. Unmarried women don’t want a baby.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/no-ring-no-baby ]

I am shook. Women don’t wanna be lumbered with the baby of a man who doesn’t care enough to be a husband and father?* They aren’t attracted to feckless manchilds?

Those bitches!

“That’s because the decline in fertility has been far greater among minorities than among non-Hispanic whites”

FEATURE

NOT. A. BUG.

Chart for the lazy people:

Look at the actual data before whining.

That’s called a selection pressure, children.

Men won’t marry? Women won’t breed.

Who wins? [women, their relatives breed]

But the “white” fertility figure is a bit misleading, as it includes most Hispanics, who have historically had much higher birth rates than non-Hispanic whites. Looking at all Hispanics together, these women are missing nearly 19% of the babies that would have been born from 2008-2016, or about 2.2 million births, as their age-adjusted fertility rates have fallen from 2.85 births per woman to just 2.1, and continue to decline. Meanwhile, non-Hispanic fertility has only declined from 1.95 births per woman to 1.72, yielding about 2.3 million missing births. Solidly half of the missing kids over the last decade would have been born to Hispanic mothers, despite the fact that Hispanics only make up about a quarter of fertility-age women.

Thus, in racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist”

Telling them to be breeding sows isn’t?

Hey, what exactly are they claiming these women should do?

Get back in the maternity ward? Pump out future Dem voters?

*If you really “care” (virtue signal) about Western birth rates, Chicken Littles of the internet, ask MGTOW why they’re complaining about the birth rate but not marrying. You don’t get to complain if you’re causing the ‘problem’.

https://www.rt.com/usa/us-white-births-census-613/

https://nypost.com/2017/09/02/cheap-sex-is-making-men-give-up-on-marriage/

A problem you cause is a CHOICE.

[GDP will go up in a generation with fewer lower IQ drains on its system.]

Other data article:

For the lazy:

“That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.”

Marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

HALF OR MORE.

Meanwhile, student loans must be written off if you care about IQ.

“It’s possible that debt may also reduce fertility, independently of marriage. Some studies do show that student debt has a strong effect on delaying fertility. The economic rationale is simple: having and raising children costs money, and student debt gobbles up a share of income right off the top of the budget. Crucially, even income-based repayment doesn’t fix this, as it resets with higher incomes: a debtor can’t earn their way out. As income rises, so do debt payments. At some high threshold, of course, the debtor can exceed the required payments and can advance the date of final repayment, but the point is that student loans, no matter how they are structured, divert money that might have gone towards planning for a child. It’s even possible that student loans delay marriage because they cause debtors to change their childbearing anticipations: maybe debtors realize they won’t be able to afford a child for a long time, and so they postpone marriage until they are (financially) ready for a child.”

Men can’t afford to marry, have kids unless loans are much lower.

Loan control would be a conservative policy, boosting high IQ fertility.

More babies being born are born to high IQ, educated parents.

Again, actual data.

“Finances, and student debt, specifically, aren’t the only reason for delayed marriage. Most unmarried people who want to get married say either that they are too young and unready for marriage, or else they haven’t found the right person. It may be that part of the problem is the decline in “marriageable men.” At the metro area level, the imbalance in sex ratios can sometimes be enormous.”

“The simple fact of the matter is that marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

ACTUAL. DATA.

Women want to have kids, it’s the mens’ fault.

“Combined, it turns out that a combination of marital status, age, and fertility ideals is a pretty good predictor of individual-level fertility. In other words, marital status serves as a circuit-breaker on fertility aims: married people get close to achieving their aims, while never-married people generally don’t.”
“But one vital driver of birth rates is marriage. And as long as the average age of first marriage rises and the number of prime childbearing years the average woman spends married falls, we can expect to see fertility linger at low levels. Therefore, any policy supporting childbirth—however generous it may be—that does not also somehow impact marriage trends is unlikely to boost long-term fertility.”

It isn’t women’s fault they won’t man up.

The data is loud and clear.

White bachelor men are cucking themselves.

Video: Hopkins on London

I suggest we send all new immigrants to Westminster and Hampstead and allow them into the expensive politicians’ children’s schools – because diversity is their strength, too.

She doesn’t mention how undemocratic it is to force the taxpayer to fund religious schools.

Jewish, Muslim or Christian.

The state shouldn’t be funding religion.

It violates freedom of religion that a Jew’s taxes go to Muslims who preach killing them or Christians’ taxes fund abortion clinics. Freedom from other religions is a right.

The first religious invasion to London was Jewish a century ago, paving the way for others and pushing out the English. The capital city of England must be English, nobody else has birthright. But look who “owns” the land.

Anchor babies are not valid, born yesterday or in 1918.

If a foreigner owns the native’s land, is that not colonialism?

They don’t get to complain about immigrants, they are the first wave.

If they liked England being English, they shouldn’t be here.

There’s no such thing as Judeo-Christian, Nietzsche invented the term to skewer two religions in satire at once.

Luther was a Christian.

They have a homeland to go back to now, Israel, they have no reason to remain.

We took them in temporarily and they’ve taken over our people, they rule over us and profiteer from our debt enslavement. Usury is un-Christian, why are Christians forced to pay it but Muslims don’t have to?

Is the Queen protector of the faith or protector of usury?

We’ve allowed ourselves to knowingly regress into barbaric practices i.e. Kosher is just as inhumane as Halal, it shouldn’t be tolerated here.

There’s no secular “culture” with such excused animal abuse.

Circumcision is obviously child abuse. The prepuce evolved, it’s anti-Darwin.

The current year in summary

Imagine living in the current year and thinking Nato and the UN, EU and Co were made for our benefit.

Extraordinary.

I’ve got my eye of Sauron on Deutsche.

SOON

I’ve long predicted this but I’ll abstain from happy-dancing just yet.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/?s=deutsche

See “Racking up” especially.

Second-class natives

This is the common opinion.

“Just ‘cos you see something, doesn’t make it true,” says the fat piggy.

They gaslighted him on national TV, also the common reaction.

“Positive discrimination” is genocide.

The taxes of one, who cannot afford children, paying for the breeding of the other.

That is slavery.

It’s kinda like handing all that money to criminals, including rapists, and the victims get nothing.

We live in a culture that celebrates evil.

It rewards laziness, greed, lust. It punishes hard work, honesty (a Christian virtue) and prudence.

We could just place all new immigrants in Hampstead and other very lefty areas. See how they like it.

comment

The people on this panel need a lesson in classical philosophy. Let me make it as simple as I know how. Hatred is a SIN, NOT a crime.

wrong, “hate what is evil”

you’re supposed to hate, if it’s righteous

if it’s a hatred of injustice

I could sit in a rocking chair in my basement all day and all night hating you. I could gather with my friends (if I had any) and we could hate you collectively—even gleefully. And we would be in trouble with God—but not with the government. We would only be in trouble with the government if we robbed you, or killed you, or beat you up, or lied to you or lied about you, or raped your wife or daughter, or burned your house or business, or any number of other such ACTS. But I could sit in my own home hating you 24/7/365 and I would have broken no civil or criminal laws, and no government agency could justifiably arrest me. In brief, so called hate crimes are an attempt of government leftists (aka, marxists) to blur the line between church and state for the purpose of usurping that which belongs to the Creator by unworthy and unwise creatures. Equally, as frightening is the realization that the recent invention of so-called Hate Crimes is a nascent attempt of government at not only regulating and punishing what it may adjudge as wrong-speech, but wrong thought! For the government to be able to declare hatred as a civil crime opens the possibility of an incalculable number of great and grave injustices. In the past, both secularists as well as many who are religious INSIST such distinctions must remain, and for good reason–especially in this age. When the people sit passively and allow the government to blur the lines between sins and crimes we passively allow our governments to seize a monstrous amount of power over the individual that will result in the complete loss of all our civil liberties. So, to Hell with all these glorified so-called elite experts on this panel. Know this: you cannot arrive at the right answer when you cut God and the transcendent out of the equation.

Love the boot on your face. Hatred is illegal. Negative emotion is banned. Lick the boot.

Thoughtcrime. You’re free to agree.

And if they come for the traitors with a rope, they’ll cry “what did I do? I’m innocent!”

You see those French vest protests? Just ‘cos you see something, doesn’t make it true…

Well, they read all the history books at their posh schools. They should’ve known this was coming.

Marx was smart enough to know the working class holds the power, the middle class delegating all this bullshit is nothing without them. You don’t replace your base.

Asians are now more privileged in Britain, more of them are middle-class (census data), the face of poverty is white in our homeland. Why? All the charity money is thrown based on skin colour. Middle-class people are getting grants and loans and help, because of who their parents are. That is injustice. That is a caste system.

comment

Britain should always put British born citizens first and that goes for any country, the indigenous people should be first in their homelands otherwise you will lose the identity of what that nation is. I want the world to be diverse just not my country or city or street for that matter. I want a strong community that can relate to each other and look after each other, why is that okay for everyone but white people?

Imagine what will happen when the immigrants of the past century find out the welfare state is broke.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

It is broke. They are here to pay.

“The world needs anger. The world often continues to allow evil because it isn’t angry enough.” ~ Bede Jarrett

It started with the women, told to sit down and shut up. Who cares if you’re publicly harassed, children bullied, daughter threatened with rape?

Then they tried it on the men. Mostly, they sat down and shut up.

Immigrant Azkaban

https://torontosun.com/news/world/danes-plan-to-banish-unwanted-migrants-to-remote-uninhabited-island/wcm/7fd80c50-463a-441b-8092-b5f99d280c0b

Like I suggested.


When are we doing that with a Scottish island?
They want to live in the West, fine.
They have no right to live in London and nice places.

Why should taxpayers fund their luxury?