Well obviously men can be raped

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-49057533

it’s just far less common due to the higher upper body strength of male attackers to females (easier pickings)

but like many rapists, the female (or unstudied, more common male on male) kind will incapacitate the victim if they can (proving intent) with alcohol, other drugs or physical restraints, like the male-to-female counterparts

“Another is that men view all sexual opportunities with women as positive.” more Jewish lies

“In fact, Weare says, “an erection is purely a physiological response to stimulus”.” they get it for no reason during sleep…. more porn lies that physical arousal = mental consent. Women are wet most of the time, it’s just the body keeping everything running, but porn lies.

“Men can obtain and sustain an erection even if they’re scared, angry, terrified etc,” she says. – more likely, especially in children or virgins or someone with a moral reason to object like religion, because fear is physical arousal.

Men own their own bodies, it should be assumed they do not give consent, that’s how the system works. Legally, the assumption is no. Like a bank can’t take your money assuming you consent. The military can’t deploy you assuming you consent to join. Porn has gaslighted white men into thinking their only value is sex toy for cheap women.

The only legitimization of consent that worked was the traditional society solution of marriage. But rape by fraud has always been illegal, including where the non-consent (because all consent has conditions, like the person being who they claim, certain contraception being used etc) was known by both parties at the time.

But consent doesn’t hold up outside an honour society, especially when sexual predators are also compulsive liars.

The ignorance about biology is intentional, blame the victim.

“There’s also research that shows women can respond sexually when they are raped (e.g. have an orgasm) because their body is responding physiologically. This is an issue for both male and female victims that is not discussed enough, but there is clear evidence in this area.”

forced orgasm is not pleasant, for either sex, it’s actually a form of pain, physical and mental

(((porn))) lies

this is about as surprising as the knee hammer test causing a reflex kick

for the same reasons, reflex, nerves

even electricity can stimulate men to orgasm, the pain of extreme electricity too

not that it’s common in female cases, they just are physically capable of it because stress tenses muscles

again quelle surprise

the brain cannot shut off the spine, it’s biologically impossible

A number of the participants in Weare’s 2017 study reported FTP experiences after getting extremely drunk or high, and being unable to stop what was happening.

In the first world, people should be able to get drunk without being raped.

Or what’s the first world?

One of those interviewed for the new study describes going home with a woman after a night out clubbing, and blacking out after being given what he suspects was a date rape drug. He says he was then forced to engage in non-consensual sex.

That could’ve turned into an kidney murder story too. Clubbing is really hunting grounds for some r-types. Hold the bars responsible for the drugs. Sometimes the bartender’s in on it.

Although (anti-white) misogynistic murderers/rapists (future serial killers) have a new excuse: “sex games”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/25/fatal-hateful-rise-of-choking-during-sex

while no human can actually ‘consent’ to be murdered, attempted or otherwise

it reminds me of the dysmorphia people who want to be blinded or have their legs chopped off

their consent isn’t valid for self-harm

and the “I was just following orders” excuse has never flown

they say porn has no influence on behaviour but it should clearly be banned, trafficking issues aside

it’s (((their))) way of ruining families and marriages with global mental competition.

The Bible clearly states looking at another with lust is adultery. Porn is un-Christian and clearly Satanic (all the violence kinda hints).

The misogynist murderers like the kink excuse because 1. it’s something to brag about in this sick world and 2. it humiliates the innocent woman. It also implicitly tries to justify what was rape – of them while alive or as a corpse, obviously they’re admitting to necrophilia. And the charges are being REDUCED for that.

All rapists are r-types, sexually aggressive up to cruelty, just write laws that punish r-types and leave the good men and women alone.

I assumed the men being raped also exhibited the researched (and linked here) “freeze” behaviour?

in women, the post-trauma freeze response leaves more semen inside, increasing the probability of pregnancy.

Another describes being coerced into sex while working at a holiday camp one summer, while he was a student. A female co-worker had discovered a letter he had written to a boyfriend, and threatened to out him as gay unless he slept with her.

Coercion vitiates consent, still rape.

As for the fantasy line, lad culture is toxic to young men (funded by magazines pushing holidays on men) and it’s also impossible to have a fantasy (controlled) about something you do not control (an attack). What those ones actually have is a domination fantasy, inaccurately and immorally described as ‘rape’.

The choking thing is a Muslim fantasy, however. Nobody will study that.

The bloodletting extension is Jewish, like that creepy comic writer in America.

Strangulation – fatal and non-fatal – “squeezing”, “neck compression” or, as some call, it “breath-play” – is highly gendered. On average, one woman in the UK is strangled to death by her partner every two weeks, according to Women’s Aid. It is a frequent feature of non-fatal domestic assault, as well as rape and robbery where women are the victims. It is striking how seldom it is seen in crimes against men.

misogynists, as well as being would-be rapists (opportunity or not) also have fantasies of murder they eventually want to act on

it’s been known since Jack the Ripper

Numerous studies have shown that non-fatal strangulation is one of the highest markers for future homicide, which is why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and most US states have developed preventative legislation to strengthen police, prosecutorial and sentencing policies that surround it. In most US states, for example, it is now compulsory for police to charge strangulation assaults as felonies. Yet in the UK, they can fall under battery – the mildest assault possible.

so is a bruise, for comparison

since they love choking so much, bring back hanging

what’s good for the goose is good for the gander

Susan Edwards, a barrister and law professor, has spent decades fighting to make strangulation a stand-alone offence.

21st century.

“In the UK, it’s routinely minimised at every level,” she says. “It’s presented as a momentary loss of control. Attempted strangulations often leave no visible injury and fatal cases too frequently end in light sentences. You hear things such as ‘lover’s tiff’. A cardiac arrest can occur within seconds during strangulation, so there’s also the defence that strangulation wasn’t the cause of death.”

hypoagency in misogynists, imagine my shock

“women are the weaker sex, which is why you need to dominate them with violence”
“I didn’t mean to kill her your Honour! it was only attempted!”

And now, a new defence has been added to the mix – consent. Fiona Mackenzie, an actuary, set up We Can’t Consent to This following the outcry over the so-called “rough sex killing” of Natalie Connolly, 26, by her millionaire partner John Broadhurst, 40. Despite the victim having 40 separate injuries, including serious internal trauma, a fractured eye socket and bleach on her face, Broadhurst received a sentence of three years, eight months for manslaughter.

Bleach on her face trying to dispose of the body. For those not in the know.

Do not defend a psychopath MO.

“People were talking about this defence as if it was one isolated incident and I knew it wasn’t,” says Mackenzie. Although English law does not recognise consent to choking – or any physical harm – in the context of consensual sex, the Labour MP Harriet Harman has just announced her intention to have this underlined again in the forthcoming domestic violence bill. “It needs more emphasis because defence teams are increasingly offering it up, maybe because rough sex has crept into the mainstream,” says Mackenzie. “I’ve had so many women get in touch to say they have been horrified on Tinder dates by partners who have choked them during sex. If you’re dating, it’s expected of you and if you don’t go along with it, you’re boring.”

not consenting to attempted murder

PUAs are rapists, more proof – because she can’t withdraw consent if she cannot talk.

No really, that’s a given reason. I’ve seen on forums they claim it works because she can’t tell you to stop.

“But the next thing I remember is waking up gasping for breath with him on top of me. I’m not sure how long I passed out for. I booked an Uber at 6.30am to get the hell out of there. The next day, I saw the bruises on my chest. We spoke after this and all he said was that, ‘we both got a bit carried away’.”

You have to go to A&E, brain damage possible with any ‘passing out’.

Blaming her, yep, PUA. It’s incitement to attack women in many cases, including overt advice to choke a woman to display ‘alpha’.

At what point does stupid trip over into evil?

“Both those women were very young, and very drunk, killed by much older men they had met just hours before,” Mackenzie says.

Textbook sexual sadist.

There’s going to be a register, isn’t there?

But, historically, it has been “niche” and an overwhelmingly male pastime.

More diversity imported from the gays. Many killers in old studies were actually homosexual…. coincidence?

Hedonists are never ever satisfied, they’ll keep pushing the boundaries of alleged ‘kink’ until society shoots them or they die.

 eventually led to section 63 of the 2008 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, making it illegal to possess an extreme pornographic image which included acts that threaten a person’s life. However, the cases that have come to court have been ones involving bestiality or child abuse. “It’s not used for scenes of violence, strangulation and rape, which is what was intended,” says Edwards.

A person who wants to murder you does not want sex, they want to murder you. Put the magazines and porn sites up on charges too. That porn is basically a mid-cancelled snuff film.

 The sex game gone wrong was something the police or Crown Prosecution Service came up with, not the defence. “It felt that the police thought she had somehow asked for it,” says Sarah. “The ‘sex game gone wrong’ story was a way of blaming everyone and no one.” The sleeping man was found not guilty. Nothing was ever explained.

will this be the Clinton’s excuse? Andrew’s?

Comic: Sympathy for the Devil

The rapists expecting praise for mature self-control are so current year.

Like the gay guy who ‘resists’ groping a straight man.

Predators are often the same people committing different crimes, thereby artificially inflating perceived criminals in society. Generally, they murder men and rape women (but sometimes also murder) so dealing with one camp’s issue is also beneficial to the other e.g. society would be greatly boosted by the death penalty for the antisocial, guiltless misfits.

Possible motive and secret history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_de_Rais#Occult_involvement
And that P family link.

“As no demon manifested after three tries, the Marshal grew frustrated with the lack of results. Prelati responded that the demon Barron was angry and required the offering of parts of a child. De Rais provided these remnants in a glass vessel at a future evocation. All of this was to no avail, and the occult experiments left him bitter and with his wealth severely depleted.”

It is a mistake that Americans only look at modern murderers.
It has all the hallmarks – French, rich, using courtly manners (fame, glib charm) to use kids in occult rituals.

“[The boy] was pampered and dressed in better clothes than he had ever known. The evening began with a large meal and heavy drinking, particularly hippocras, which acted as a stimulant. The boy was then taken to an upper room to which only Gilles and his immediate circle were admitted. There he was confronted with the true nature of his situation. The shock thus produced on the boy was an initial source of pleasure for Gilles.”

Why hasn’t there been a film?
This gets very dark, though.
Yet it’s on wikipedia.

Deliberate choice somewhere.

“Poitou further testified that Rais sometimes abused the victims (whether boys or girls) before wounding them and at other times after the victim had been slashed in the throat or decapitated. According to Poitou, Rais disdained the victim’s sexual organs, and took “infinitely more pleasure in debauching himself in this manner … than in using their natural orifice, in the normal manner.”

If that isn’t a sexual sadist.

Yet the DSM refuses to include it (because psychiatric prisons don’t grant easy parole – they may be sick but they aren’t thick).

“very often when the children were dying he sat on their stomachs and took pleasure in seeing them die and laughed”

He doesn’t say where he learned this, implying it was… in the family.
People like that confess what made them like that.
Then confessing would logically spare his relatives from being suspected.

“After Rais admitted to the charges on 21 October,[39] the court canceled a plan to torture him into confessing.”

Shame. Nobody is as frightened of pain as a sadist.

“said to be so lurid that the judges ordered the worst portions to be stricken from the record.”

Thanks, from future historians.

It allows creeps to continue doing this stuff (enables) because nobody believes (appeal to incredulity) it ever happened in history… because where’s the official court record?

“The number of murders is generally placed between 80 and 200; a few have conjectured numbers upwards of 600. The victims ranged in age from six to eighteen and included both sexes, but were predominantly boys.”

One man, really? With power yes, but only one partaking?

Bathory is famous for hardly any, if you look into it.

Considering his MO of preference with boys, who wanted the girls?

For those wondering, boys were easier to get hold of, more gullible (taught men wouldn’t target them that way based on incredulity and a just world fallacy) and less likely to be missed when missing and presumed to have run away. Yes, it’s sexist. Classism is another thing they predate on, e.g. a famous person distracting the other from their gut with that fame or a hungry man offering a poor girl food.

“Writers such as secret-societies specialist Jean-Pierre Bayard, in his book Plaidoyer pour Gilles de Rais, contend he was a victim of the Inquisition.”

French book, eh?

He could have been innocent and conspired against by a cult, he could have been covering for a cult.

Here’s where it gets interesting, I knew this name from books and this is what’s been scratching at my brain hoping I’d remember.

In 1992, Freemason Jean-Yves Goëau-Brissonnière, the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of France, organized a self-proclaimed “court” consisting of former French ministers, parliament members and UNESCO experts to re-examine the source material and evidence available at the medieval trial. A team of lawyers, writers and politicians led by Gilbert Prouteau and presided over by Judge Henri Juramy found him not guilty, although none of the initiators was a medieval historian by profession. In addition, none of them sought professional advice from certified medievalists”

I knew it. A French person first told me about him and how, in France, he’s a semi-mythic figure.

“The hearing, which concluded Gilles de Rais was not guilty of the crimes, was partially turned into a fictionalized biography called Gilles de Rais ou la Gueule du loup, narrated by the writer Gilbert Prouteau. “The case for Gilles de Rais’s innocence is very strong”, Prouteau said. “No child’s corpse was ever found at his castle at Tiffauges and he appears to have confessed to escape excommunication … The accusations appear to be false charges made up by powerful rival lords to benefit from the confiscation of his lands.”[65]

Well, did those lords kill the missing kids/teens then? Begging the Q.

The ol’ jealousy plea, typical of liars.

However, the journalist Gilbert Philippe from the newspaper Ouest-France said that Prouteau was being “facetious and provocative”.[66] He also claimed that Prouteau thought the retrial was basically “an absolute joke”. Historians continue to believe him guilty of the crimes, mainly differing as to his motivation.”

Who writes history again?

I wonder if any famous creeps have a painting of him in their mansion? That would seal it.
Now I’m starting to wonder if his ally Joan of Arc was actually a witch, as was considered at the time. Big if true.

Remember, those who read history, that the French used to use their own ancestor’s fallen soldier skeletons abandoned in fields as fertilizer, literally dig up the bones and grind them down and sell them to make food people eat. French people are weird, English paranoia is just. It isn’t just frogs’ legs.

I remember this Frenchman telling me how, in his research, he found it “odd” that Versailles was founded on a hunting …lodge.

In modern terms, it’s like buying an island. I would look at Versailles’s structure and ownership to look for clues but that would take years.

And why are Mason’s lodges called lodges? It’s a specific hunting term.

The Sun King is chock full of symbolism alone, there are whole books.

It’s like how Caesar might’ve survived if he’d kept it in his toga. The most famous bisexual nobody ever brings up in that context.

A voice for murderers, more like

Women tend to get custody because women evolved for childcare.

Including far lower infanticide rates. That isn’t “gynocentrism”, that’s called evolution.

You can’t say a woman’s place is raising kids – but men get custody. Those are opposites.

It’s like either women are too physically weak to fend off rape or the draft should be extended. The former is true in both cases, the latter is rationalization based on liberal creationism.

Child psychology shows a far greater dependence on the mother. It’s science.

You don’t pick your slow cousin in dodgeball. You don’t pick the fat runner.
You are good at some things and terrible at others. Get over yourself.

Childcare is like the ONE thing men can never claim. Yet they try?

Do you also have more manly periods? Competition in men is only for OTHER MEN.

Competing with women on female tasks is… weak, basically. Imagine a woman challenging a man to a colour description test. It’s patently unfair and low. You have to rig it? Ew, omega.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6975391/murder-suicide-note-dad-suffocated-daughter-with-plastic-bag/

A MONSTROUS dad who suffocated his seven-year-old daughter in an alleged murder-suicide left a note on her body saying the family “got what they deserved”.

Why does everyone hate MRAs?

Her mother Kathryn’s family revealed she was desperately trying to get full custody of Kayden from her ex-partner because of his “history of violence”.

It’s a mystery.

Rape/kidnapping/murder apologists aka narcissists.

No, you are not entitled to everything you want.