muh ‘but the military will protect us’ – no they’re whores, you don’t pay them. The army take the D-students. You cannot reason with a goon.
something something barcodes (paging Adolf) something something told ya so something something they want to sterilise you, wait and see why else start with the nascent generation? Patient Zero of fertility.
They already don’t use parental consent for vaccines here, parents aren’t warned when things like BCG are ‘offered’ and the kids marched out without asking. They just do it. Teachers are state agents. You can try to stay behind, but they’ll try to intimidate you or lie about you ‘having to have it’. Then you have to threaten to sue and point out any penetration without consent is rape. Nothing less works. That’s why they’re bringing in the military. Good luck telling them no. I’m sure the paperwork ‘opting out’ will be forged or lost or mis-labelled “in the system” as consent given. Keep the kids home from school, online is better anyway. No pedos or Marxists. Record all the teachers, in-school or online. Listen to the vaccine lies.
This is warming them up to forced vaccines, like farm animals.
Military presence alone is intimidating.
The child can also refuse at the last minute, how many know this? Also, I bet they’ll confiscate phones just before, so you can’t film refusals or holding minors down. While they permanently damage the brain tissue of children. Clear fluid is not snot, the brain is leaking CSF.
So-called meditation is a religious practice, a form of prayer. It is communication with spiritual entities beyond one’s body. It has no place in schools. Schools want to impose it because it forms a kind of repression in the developing brain, it is cliche Victorian emotional repression (the stiff upper lip). I happen to think the state and agents of the state should have no ‘right’ to call a citizen’s emotions invalid or wrong. Children are not hysterics to be corrected into quiet submission. These mindful or mindless devotionals are used to control children, by adults, a great evil. The meditation as they would practise it is pagan in origin and cannot be made secular. One’s Higher Self is godly, the Creator. It is the thing we rejoin once we die. Clearly, this is horrendously inappropriate to ‘teach’ children in a school setting, under the guise of keeping them quiet (stiff upper lip) and teaching ‘focus’. All prayer teaches focus by repetition of words or concepts with the express purpose of drowning out personal emotion. Schools should not be emptying the minds of the students. It is a toxic concept, and you can point to all the scientism studies you like and it won’t change the fact children should not be lectured on their very thought process and censored therein, by the State! This is how docile populaces are made, and the brain changes are permanent. We call this clipping of their wings brain damage, if we’re being more accurate. There is nothing inherently wrong with their natural, evolving brain development! Being a healthy, developing child is not a sin and should not be condemned with appropriated, shallow religious practices.
Piaget believed that what he referred to as “hypothetical-deductive reasoning” was essential at this stage of intellectual development. At this point, teens become capable of thinking about abstract and hypothetical ideas.
Capable! Prior to this, critical rejection is impossible.
But religious material is taught as RE, prior to this…..
The State cannot preach contentment and faith in devotional practices like a church. It is curious that such a ‘process’ does not work without faith and this failure would present in older children more often, so the schools push the prayer earlier. In the same way children are not physically capable of performing all the same activities, it is a violation of human rights to foist any censorship onto their emotional mind. The right to feel is human and sacrosanct, legally. Blotting out ‘undesirable’ emotions by the state agents, like anger, is cruel and unusual punishment. Not to mention, impossible. The military doesn’t go so far as to call possibly righteous emotions like anger ‘wrong’. A negative emotion is not innately ‘bad’ or wrong. If the teachers have failed to earn the respect (and obedience) of the students, however many drugs are pushed into that population, then perhaps the fault is with the adults and not the children? If we look at the league tables and life outcomes, a child’s disrespect of their teachers (and ‘misbehaviour’, aka questioning authority) is entirely valid.
“brain training” – it’s brainwashing
It’s creepy to watch those kids do qi or psi practices (those hand gestures) and think this is scientific.
Pushing Buddhism, they literally have a guy right there.
“their brains are being reshaped” – by the State
They’re encouraging ego death in white kids. See the fleeting reference to privilege, later? It forces a kind of depersonalization and derealization. Let me guess, this only ‘needs’ to be done on white kids in white schools?
If it were scientific, it’d work 100% of the time. This is based on faith.
When you drink water, you’re hydrated. There’s cause. With this, the ‘stress’ placebo only works if you believe it will. Slow breathing will literally do the same thing, but they want an empty mind.
Marcus Aurelius taught about ‘controlling the mind’ too but he was white and didn’t promote ego death for Cultural Marxism, so you won’t hear about it.
“delusions such as anger or attachment” ATTACHMENT. Like to your family, country, attachment!
“ignorance, jealousy, so when the mind is out of control” They’re gaslighting children as hysterics.
Lobotomies have such a bad rep.
“They can’t control what they say or what they do”
I think they can they’re human beings, this is dehumanisation. Worshipping Buddha, a man, is idolatry. It isn’t actually a religion, there is no God.
“everything we do relates to our intention”
the road to Hell actually the West judges by character and behaviour
I’m sure there are some really nice, lonely pedophiles, they’re still evil.
“be mindful of the correct things” WHAT correct things? oh DO tell us!
(he does not)
“everyone needs to meditate” – some weeb larper
“clarity and peace within our mind” – you mean around authorities like school?
We had those things in the West for millennia.
Since you can’t do anything about political correctness, why not just make the best of it?
Why not exploit the situation instead of moaning about it?
Do what is expedient – why not?
Why not make a successful career out of PC – like so many others?
Why not surrender your private mind to PC, in the same way as you have already surrendered your public behaviour?
By having any reservations at all, you are making yourself miserable – why not simply cast-aside those reservations?
Just say an inner yes to what you will, anyway, be forced to do…
Since you necessarily inhabit the thought prison that is political correctness – then why not, at least, become one of the ‘trustys’ among the inmates – to assist with the smooth running of the gaol, and get yourself a few privileges.
Why not, indeed, strive to become one of the guards? Somebody has to do the job? Maybe you could temper the severity of the regime?
And herein lies the particular temptation for the intellectual elite – a temptation few resist.
That (literally) soul-destroying pragmatism by which (for eminently sensible reasons) we quietly, by gradual degrees, change sides in the spiritual battle of the world: that unseen warfare between The Good and that which opposes The Good.
Well why not?
There is no earthly reason why not.
In a world of pervasive and powerful PC, there is really only one compelling reason for holding back and resisting in any way, shape or form – which is that embracing political correctness will shrink your soul.
If you do not believe in the soul, this reason will carry no force at all: so by your own calculations you are stupid to resist PC.
the reprobate mind
Or, if you believe the soul is inviolable, and that nothing you think or do can affect the soul: then also, by your own calculations, you are stupid to resist PC.
If you do not believe in Natural Law (innate knowledge of The Good), and that breaking Natural Law harms the soul: then logically you should learn to love PC.
If you do not believe in the reality of transcendental good – then you might as well go with the flow, allow yourself to be re-programmed: to learn, by regular practice, to re-label lies as truth, ugliness as beauty, evil as virtue; until PC has entered into your heart and soul, as well as pouring into your ears and out-from your mouth.
But political correctness is nihilism; therefore it is not merely political: it is also existential.
To fight against political correctness is therefore ultimately an existential act: a battle to preserve the eternal soul.
But if you do not believe that political correctness will harm your eternal soul: then you would be well-advised to suck it up.
“as a scientist, categorically”
Mengele was a scientist, wouldn’t trust him with kids. Scientists are not a superior race, free of motive and emotionality.
The nose in the air is creepy.
It’s a placebo action, there is no actual control because the kids know when they’re doing it.
Controlled breathing would be a control. But they won’t do that- no effect!
“the stories that we tell about ourselves, about other people, aren’t necessarily true” paging Scientology How is this the business of the State? How is self-image and identity their concern?
and “about other people” – such AS? “so we can enquire into that”
violation of human rights, right to privacy this is experimentation violating the Nuremberg Code
Can the State psychoanalyze you? Where is the consent?
“a healthy skepticism about our thought process” well calling it healthy makes it healthy pass the deep-fried Mars bar this is science
can I be skeptical of your skepticism?
if it’s real, why can’t I question it?
If you guessed I was the one replying, you’d be right. Also measurement error.
the ‘get em young’ thing is a huge red flag
they go from showing teens, discussing teens to…
“8 and 9 year-olds”
and the Buddhist guy wants to be left alone around them, in a hypnotic state.
I had a feeling about this…
Can Mindfulness Help Reduce Racism?
Can we override hidden prejudice? A new study says, yes, it can be done—and the key might be mindfulness meditation.
In their study, 72 white college students were measured on their levels of implicit bias of blacks and the elderly using the IAT.
Was it a KKK convention? How else to only include white kids? What are the odds?
Another anti-white methodology, ignore the coincidence.
Some participants then listened to a 10-minute mindfulness meditation in which they were instructed to “become aware of bodily sensations (heartbeat and breath) and fully accept these sensations and any thoughts without restriction, resistance, or judgment”;
That’s one way pedos groom kids. So it’s beyond just steady breathing, you see. It’s self-hypnosis.
They don’t assign it as homework because then they couldn’t implant various notions while the kid is suggestible.
other participants listened to a recording about natural history, voiced by the same narrator.
Why not steady breathing? That isn’t a real control.
Afterwards, the two groups of students were evaluated on their levels of mindfulness and then reassessed on their levels of implicit bias using the IAT.
IAT is BS.
Results showed that people who listened to the 10-minute mindfulness recording demonstrated less implicit bias against blacks and old people on the race and age IATs than individuals who listened to the other 10-minute recording. In other words, the mindfulness intervention decreased students’ automatic biases against blacks and older adults.
The mind is numb, they’d be less likely to associate rabbits with carrots, too! It retards the thought process.
For example, mindfulness training has been shown to help overeaters decrease the automatic attractiveness of fatty foods, allowing them to resist eating those foods when the foods are presented to them.
It literally over-rides survival, yeah.
This is like the hen-chalk thing with people, it suppresses nervous function (fear appraisal). A fox could walk right in front of them and they wouldn’t move. Non-response is not good.
They’re doing this to your kids.
One interesting consideration is that in the present study the mindfulness training was very brief and non-specific—in other words, the authors did not specifically try to train the participants in bias-reduction.
Retardation, same thing. Stop noticing studies.
With no warning of the true purpose, the subject cannot resist – just like that chicken.
This leads the authors to suggest that brief mindfulness training may be a good substitute for—or may augment—more traditional anti-bias training.
Even if we try to act adopt a colorblind view in the world, it doesn’t work because our brains don’t actually work that way.
They know what they’re doing.
In my own work, I identify, develop and examine the efficacy of a set of practices that intentionally link inner and outer work to raise awareness about race and racial experience in our lives, with a focus on personal, interpersonal, and systemic or structural levels.
The resulting “ColorInsight Practices ” combine mindfulness-based practices with teaching and learning about race and color to increase awareness of how race and color impact us all, and give rise to insight and greater understanding. They pave the way to new experiences that help us loosen our attachments to narratives and other forms of suffering that give rise to biases along the way…..
Attachments are GOOD, a human RIGHT.
The Nazis wanted to end suffering, if we’re going in that direction.
Why is nobody talking about this? Controlled ops. Plenty of proof.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862075/ Discrimination hurts, but mindfulness may help: Trait mindfulness moderates the relationship between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms
Discriminatory experiences are not only momentarily distressing, but can also increase risk for lasting physical and psychological problems. Specifically, significantly higher rates of depression and depressive symptoms are reported among people who are frequently the target of prejudice. Given the gravity of this problem, this research focuses on an individual difference, trait mindfulness, as a protective factor in the association between discrimination and depressive symptoms. In a community sample of 605 individuals, trait mindfulness dampens the relationship between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms. Additionally, mindfulness provides benefits above and beyond those of positive emotions. Trait mindfulness may thus operate as a protective individual difference for targets of discrimination.
Discrimination is critical thought, it’s vital for cognition.
Brief Mindfulness Meditation Reduces Discrimination.
Recent research has demonstrated that mindfulness meditation reduces implicit race and age bias by weakening the associations of the target group with negative constructs. The current research examined the potential for mindfulness to also affect discriminatory behavior. Participants listened to either a 10-min mindfulness audio or a control audio before playing a game in which they interacted with partners of different races in a simulation and decided how much they trusted them with their money. Results indicated that the mindfulness condition exhibited significantly less discrimination in the Trust Game than did either of the 2 control conditions. The implications and importance of mindfulness meditation in alleviating bias are discussed.
As thought control, it’s more effective than regular placebo!
Can direct change in state of consciousness through specific mental techniques extend human life and reverse age-related declines? To address this question, 73 residents of 8 homes for the elderly (mean age = 81 years) were randomly assigned among no treatment and 3 treatments highly similar in external structure and expectations: the Transcendental Meditation (TM) program, mindfulness training (MF) in active distinction making, or a relaxation (low mindfulness) program. A planned comparison indicated that the “restful alert” TM group improved most, followed by MF, in contrast to relaxation and no-treatment groups, on paired associate learning; 2 measures of cognitive flexibility; mental health; systolic blood pressure; and ratings of behavioral flexibility, aging, and treatment efficacy. The MF group improved most, followed by TM, on perceived control and word fluency. After 3 years, survival rate was 100% for TM and 87.5% for MF in contrast to lower rates for other groups.
Notice that this is one of only a handful of meditation studies that carefully tries to control for expectation — the placebo effect — so it is a more robust study-design than most people are used to seeing and the findings should therefore be that much more reliable.
I cannot find a straight placebo study.
Almost like they’re the same, at differing intensity.
Why not do a study with a control that just counts their breath to 100 again and again?
When we walk slower in parks, our breathing unconsciously adjusts down to our walking pace, it isn’t woo woo magical thinking bullshit.
In a pre-industrial West, we had no problem relaxing.
An association between multiculturalism and psychological distress
Amidst increasing focus on rising rates of substance abuse and suicide among white Americans and extending prior research on intergroup attitudes and health, this study examines a novel factor associated with psychological distress: disagreement with multiculturalism. Using the Portraits of American Life Study (N = 2,292), logistic regressions indicate that for Whites and Hispanics, increased likelihood of psychological distress (depression, hopelessness and worthlessness) is associated with stronger disagreement with multiculturalism, measured as “If we want to create a society where people get along, we must recognize that each ethnic group has the right to maintain its own unique traditions.” For Blacks, however, attitudes toward multiculturalism are not associated with psychological distress. Future research might determine if these results can be replicated, and if so, identify the causal mechanism(s) at work
Really it should be mentacide but that’s just English.*
That’s what my books say. I guess either works.
The concept of “menticide” indicates an organized system of judicial perversion and psychological intervention, in which a powerful tyrant transfers his own thoughts and words into the minds and mouths of the victims he plans to destroy or to use for his own propaganda. Modern psychiatry may deliver him several tools for this perversion. Our psychiatric standpoint toward this challenge has to be formulated. Examples of menticide are described and ways of protection indicated.
Look into the corrupt shell companies claiming property ownership in the West. Reject them.
HBD has proven in studies that chromosomes dictate culture. Do not permit collectivists to live here.
No, no exceptions. No such thing as a good Trojan horse. Still an invader.
The illusion of Star Trek infinite resources is just that. The State cannot pay for your luxury.
The producers always pay, it’s utterly dysgenic.
Paying the out-group or low IQ to breed is genocidal. 100IQ license for both parents to have any state support of your childbearing. Have kids below that, but don’t expect taxpayers to fund people who aren’t even average.
That money belongs to the germline who earned it to have their own children.
Taking it directly prevents births and family foundation – c
d – transfer of wealth from earners to state breeders/sponsored voters
Sure enough, a meat tax has been mooted. But the big problem with green taxes is that they hit the least affluent hardest. It’s people on low incomes who are most sensitive to marginal increases in the cost of their food and flights and who might decide they can’t afford their one holiday a year as a result.
I know people who’ve never been on holiday, you bourgeoisie whore.
Could you go on holiday home and never come back?
But it’s the very well-off who can much more easily absorb the cost of green taxes who do the bulk of the polluting: the richest 10% of households in the UK produce four times as many emissions as those in the bottom 50. That’s one reason why a jury set up by the Food Ethics Council rejected the idea of a meat tax last week.
Archive, archive, archive.
They’re so classist they can’t even say rich and poor now, it’s too triggering.
They might have a peep show moment and realize calling for further starvation of people already going to food banks, paid below inflation as prices rise and skipping meals so the kids can eat (tag food security) makes them the bad guys.
So what they’re actually swinging at is a wealth tax on luxury food – that doesn’t affect them, people who purchase luxury food. I’m so glad champagne yields are fucked by global cooling. Foodies should just move abroad if they hate ‘British’ food so much.
How about rationing JUST flights? That’d work!
Way to make a middle-class cunt expose themselves – “but what if I deserve four holidays and three breaks a yar?”
We all need to eat, we don’t all need to go to the Maldives.
Ration flyer miles. Poor people can sell theirs, it works!
I want to do more, but I know I need someone to force me to take my carbon footprint more seriously.
r-type inner monologue: I’m weak so I’m gonna use that as an excuse to curtail your right to live.
[Food: You know the rich would buy their way out of it.]
Best way to ‘reduce your footprint’ is ban imports of fruit, actually. Your breakfast shouldn’t travel more than the chav down the road in a decade.
This is what happens when you let the out-group invade your media.
I hear this stuff before all of you.
The fact that would boost Podesta’s investment in Frankenmeat is a complete coincidence….
Eat your peanut protein pesticide burger, serf!
Harvard purchased land for its water supply.
Let me guess – the ethnic restaurants are exempt?
Londoners are exempt?
Will KFC and all rip-offs be forcibly shut down?
I guess at least rape gangs couldn’t run kebab shops to get rid of the bodies.
Lefties are exempt?
White people only?
We could cut off foreign aid, they use it to buy meat!
And do the suppliers stop supplying in this country? No.
They get to sell it to China and we can’t complain, because that’s what the Government wanted.
I warned ya. If you’re not fucking furious yet, you don’t understand what they’re doing.
Prior to famine, if you reduce the quality of the food, an uprising is far less likely because the populace would lack the brainpower (vegan brain fog) and energy. Ideally you’d do this over decades so generations of young no longer remember drive (further reduced with pot smoking) and clarity (here, take this pill!). To increase food palatability, spice everything in sight so you can’t taste the vegetarian shit. Because that’s 99% of cooking if you’re Asian and thick.
When are we taxing spices, eh?
SSRIs are like Gen Y magic beans. Hope you didn’t plan on a burger with your chemical lobotomy, that’d be immoral!
Don’t look at food production data! Don’t compare with immigration data!
It’s totes S U S T A I N A B L E
Your logic here is that as you are unable to control your personal impulses you want to inflict your world view on everybody else by coercion.
Hitler wanted rations at the camps…..
It’s literal death camp ration logic.
The biggest meat consumers in this country also fly the most to visit family and export child rape victims as ‘brides’ so…. this could be funny.
Sorry you are an adult and need to take responsibility for your own actions/inactions and its really not down to me to make you a better person by forcing you to do the things you know you really should do
You’re trying to reason with the brown.
Because that’s worked so well since we colonized Africa.
Maybe we should get Peterson on to tell her to clean her room.
This is very much, a middle class problem. There are large numbers of poor working people in this country who can’t afford to drive, take foreign holidays or eat much meat. They are already on rations. How about giving them a mention.
Because she’s a classist whore, obviously. She cares about the ‘planet’, at the expense of the people.
But the planet will be fine, this is an ecosystem question.
What’s the blitheringly obvious risk?
All this discussion of ‘sin tax’ and in the age of antibiotic resistance, not making the repeat STD offenders pay for their own? If an adult can buy their own Pill or condoms, and consensually not use the latter, why not clean their own urethra they’re frequently, deliberately polluting? And making everyone else likelier to die in hospital each time, there’s your ‘tragedy of the commons’.
Some people in London are literally human biohazards. It isn’t the cows.
I propose a thot and manwhore tax on their STD treatments.
This is what happens when you give teachers priestly powers over kids. They have no moral authority or real world ability. Suddenly everyone is ‘telling’ on everyone else.
Close to ethnic cleansing is ideological cleansing first.
The heretics! Blasphemers!
Monster mobbing is condoned by the Party, in fact, compulsory!
Thought Prison really didn’t go far enough, did it?
They must be desperate to pull up anyone and everyone.
If you look at the witch trial stuff – if you didn’t finger someone, you’d be suspect. If they sink or swim, they’re suspect. An impossible game to keep everyone busy while those in power snuff out imaginary challengers.
Well, you don’t change things by taking the other guy’s job.
You replace the whole structure. Then they fall from the foundation, having lost the loyalty of the bottom of the pyramid (working class) who actually keep it altogether, it’s inevitable and that’s causing desperation.
They’re stopping people from thinking with a clear head and building a competing structure… since that would work better.
It’s like ideological whack a mole. I’ve kept out of it, obvious red herring.
If they don’t slap down ALL challenges, real or imaginary, their failure will happen sooner.
They rely on your engagement.
Leeches need a blood supply.
Solution: Enforce defamation.
Words have meanings, reckless aspersions is also defamation, look it up.
If you’re calling someone a Nazi, they’d better actually be one or give just cause to make a reasonable person think so (not sarcasm). You can’t just claim it and pretend your feelings make it real, these people claim telepathy beyond the subject themselves (which is actually gaslighting) e.g. he says he isn’t but he must be because (reasoning Sherlock Holmes would slap them for). The rationalizations are poison. Also seen this from fake conservatives e.g. the faux scare about man-hating because right-wingers hate deadbeats.
You can dislike someone without thinking they’re Hitler. Keep your non sequiturs well away from me.
It’s a distraction to cease holding the left ACCOUNTABLE for its decades of FAILED predictions.
Do not forget.
When you see a leftist, laugh at them. Years of cold temperatures and they’re still panicking over waterworld. Years of immigration and they’re complaining about the economy, high rents and crime. Years of inviting parasites and they’re crying how they will never retire or have kids but their taxes funded 16 imports down their street. LAUGH.
These multicultural missionaries expect to be taken seriously. They’re useful idiots. They sell the ideological equivalent of Beanie Babies in the current year. If they miss out on a promotion, tell them an immigrant deserves to take their job. With glee!
Remind them of their own ideas and that now we feel the consequences.
Let the nonsense pass and keep focus where it should be, on the Left’s predictions.
Especially mentioning the classism of the modern left and class treason of their promises makes them screech like a witch burning at the stake. Labour is full of class traitors, the betrayal is valid. That is all we need know. The Left want a discussion. Do not give them one.
Starve the attention whores.
The Left need to remember that Citizen Robespierre fell to Madame Guillotine.
Please report to your local denunciation station for having a sense of humour.
All you activist lot aren’t even trolling the left properly.
You don’t post overt stuff, you hint and let them go batshit. Much more fun.
Like, post gardening stuff and say you’re preparing for global cooling. #cycle24
If it won’t happen, why do they care? Lazy people hate action, it leaves them behind. Make them feel out of touch, since they are. Being upbeat and active kills them.
Blithely, when they try to concern troll about the economy “at least if there’s another recession the immigrants will go back home”.
Multiculturalism has killed clubbing. White women don’t want to go to a dark place full of white fever fetishists who are so uncivilized they think they can ignore the word ‘No’. If you’re harassed or assaulted by a savage, YOU might get arrested for being a white woman and rejecting them/reporting them. One of their first tactics is to accuse you of “racism” so …yeah. They’re that entitled and creepy. You can try to deny this but women vote with their feet.
We’re using what little freedom of association we still have to white flight out of a scene which PRESUMES you wanted to be attacked.
If no isn’t respected as an option, we nope out of there. Men get attacked by foreigners too.
The low IQ do not know the rules or feel exempt and nag and nag and have all sorts of ‘tricks’ they think are acceptable to get in your way. They think white women are whores and clubs are the brothel. They ask to “borrow” money from white men, like, everybody’s avoiding the Rotherham types.
Being targeted for our race and sex is racist but the police are ‘diverse’ and probably related to them.
We don’t drink there (it’s also a date rape drug, good luck getting a jury to listen to you), we don’t like the music and you can’t have a conversation. Then there’s the middle-age guys acting like an abusive stepdad, trying to get you drunk purely to rape you – who pretend it isn’t rape*, they just want you nice and weak… Let’s line up to be felt up by aged Peter Pans!
Yay, let’s spend hundreds like the stupid American rappers buying bottle service!
This is an IQ test.
Private parties and member’s clubs are thriving because it’s basically allowed to be natives only.
Genophilia is a human impulse and right, genocide involves not allowing an assembly of a group with its own kind.
If we could all legally consent to avoid the anti-white predators, clubs would be more popular than ever.
“which extended the legislation’s remit to cover employment and housing”
The acts of statute are invalid because the native’s natural right to freedom of association and property rights are inviolate.
According to this, you don’t actually own your company or house. The government has taken the right of ownership to tell you who you must include.. but the Garrick still excludes women, this is just a race thing.
The thing they claim doesn’t exist.
We’d go to pubs if the Muslims stopped getting them closed. Why is there social housing in London? Why are taxpayers forced to commute in?
*If they don’t want you sober, they don’t want you. That isn’t courtship, it’s predation.
Ironically, to enforce the Bible, in places.
Specifically the places where it wasn’t working. 
“Divorce was granted
only after an official inquiry by a judge, who had to determine
whether “appropriate grounds”-very narrowly defined in terms of
marital offenses-existed.6 When a divorce was granted, the state asserted broad authority to structure the economic relationship of the spouses and to maintain regulatory jurisdiction over the children and their relationship to the parents.7 Doctrines such as collusion,8
connivance,9 and condonation’0 were meant to curtail the degree to
which parties themselves could bring about a divorce through agreement; the procedural requirements reflected the view that everyone was “a suspicious character.”
Among other things, no-fault divorce is also responsible for a lower spousal suicide rate, probably homicide (harder to measure) and certainly lower rates of domestic abuse. Overturning it requires an open admission these things do happen, one or both parties can be absolutely awful at their job and they still maintain the right to decide their intimate business over whatever State they happen to be stuck in. Appealing to tradition doesn’t really work when some of those values were very poorly aligned with the law at the time, to keep up Pollyanna appearances. To go back to all the old laws, men would have to prove good character (what is that? nobody would get married) and women would be able to press charges for seduction (rape by fraud is already historically present in the law books, i.e. nobody would get married). A lot of the modern “dating” process would also be swiftly made illegal.
Funny they never mention that.
And if men were the sex wriggling to get away, it begs two questions. Firstly, why the fuck did they propose? Second, wouldn’t that constitute abandonment on his part? A grave matter, severely punished, we all know of deadbeats who’d be whipped into shape by a return of fault laws. No-fault divorce treats men equally to women (justice is blind ‘n all), because they’re given the benefit of the doubt where they could be abandoned too.
A list of unisex faults and standards of proof are required, rooted in the post-Reformation Bible, instead of a reversion to a system that blatantly did not work. Two ruined lives plus children is not a success. For example, allowing divorce but banning re-marriage would silence many vocal oppositions. If there’s a limit on abortion and insurance claims, there should logically be one on an oath including “til death do you part”. These faults should be acknowledged in the marriage contract itself, along with ways to avoid them, and an expanded edition to make sure both parties really intend to follow through on their oath (which should be set in stone for legal reasons).
“In the Old Testament, God allowed divorce if a man’s heart became so hardened against his wife that she was actually better off without him“
…That isn’t rare. Calculate the odds of marrying anyone with mental problems nowadays. Any mental problem.
Unhappy wives used to hire men to fake affairs and “accidentally” get caught until the 30s when the only common American grounds for divorce was adultery. Your system needs work. Increase your marriage age to 18 for starters, you monsters. Child brides are both a Muslim and an American thing.
If you have a problem with keeping the age of consent at the age of adulthood…. what about voting?
Some simple changes and why:
a hard limit on the number of times anyone can marry excepting widowhood.
a grievance period for widows where marriage is not allowed, depending on how long they were married.
if someone’s sexuality changes, they’re considered to have defrauded the other party of their agreed companionship.
long engagements only, 6-12 months?
one party letting themselves go completely is taken as a clinical indicator (already is) of passive-aggression or depression
no addicts, taking up any addiction is grounds for no-fault divorce on behalf of the other party due to the brain damage effectively killing the person they married and rely upon
marriage is not considered a license to any form of abuse, higher conduct is expected compared to strangers
abandonment includes social, you agreed to be there for one another not at the club/bar/party
romance must go both ways
if someone turns out to be a psychopath (the only condition that can fake it until the wedding), divorce is allowed and the proven psychopath’s influence over the other party limited to account for their condition (ideally you test before marriage?)
18+, I hope this one is obvious.
if one party works from home it is counted as work for the marriage
real Christians only, married in a Christian ceremony
complaining about their marriage online illegal (other people’s marital status or marriages too) – privacy law
no atheists (think of the divorce risk), they don’t need a “piece of paper”, remember?
adulterers can be sued again, but per act and depravity – would branding be too far?
all bastard children from adultery aborted (risky but I’ll put it, it spares the legitimate children their rights)
no adulterous unions could wed (because obviously they can’t be trusted with it)
a cap on how much weddings can actually cost because... Jesus….
earnings prior to marriage not counted in divorce proceedings, including inheritance, which skips over the spouse to the children.