Fake alpha narcissists

It’s like any man who must say “I am king” is no true king.

Writ large.

Mostly they’re cluster Bs, usually male borderlines, so insecure in their identity they conflate bullying and domineering behaviour for confidence, having no true self or inner world beyond the superficial obnoxiousness.

And they think it’s okay because as Bs, they project everyone else ‘must’ be the same way (only lying about it).

All the alphas I’ve met were really nice. Family men types. The kind of happy that cluster Bs DESPISE. Alpha is a breeding pair. Female alphas don’t mention it either. If you’re at the top (a 10 overall) then why be mean? Where is the gain?

How can alpha/other exist if men don’t have genetic/appearance based leagues?

Why obsess over height or your jaw then?

All those refs to ‘dating studies’ that’s really just ONE study (I think OKC?) about women filtering the top men as a matter of course – well, that’s the imperative for women – filtering. That’s the whole point of dating, to find the One. It’s feminine. It’s normal. It’s loyal. It’s SEXUAL SELECTION. Most complaints re this line are pure cope from the unfit males. If you’re alpha, wouldn’t you be in that group? How is that a PROBLEM then? If women had no standards, they’d be prostitutes. ‘Game’ is linguistically the psyops done on trafficking victims to stay as slaves, so telling normal or sub-par men to ‘improve their game’ is knowingly encouraging them to waste their time by sociopathic men who know it doesn’t work.

The self-proclaimed alpha thing for individuals (rather than sociologically, which is valid) is really just astrology for men. Leos are jerks though. It’s literally a basic bitch list of negative Leo traits repackaged as “the chicks dig this, trust random posts on the internet, would we lie to you?”

Look at their wives, that’s all I’m saying. If they had a pussy VIP pass, they’d have a 10 trophy wife.

In studies, women want a man for a husband who is high in conscientiousness. Cluster Bs are the opposite.

Why don’t the manosphere tell you dat, huh?

Ring hungry people

Well this is interesting.
Narcissists (m/f) view marriage as status and deval (bail) when it needs work.

Both have kids prior, so why is he acting like being divorced is the dealbreaker?

You BOTH have kids. He isn’t actually single, he has dependents.

He’s 39, he’s over half dead. Why waste each other’s time?

Personally, I’ve had random men chase me over the idea of wifey (confusing my politics and religion for vulnerable narc desperation, lol nope) and detected strong grandiose narcissism in the ring-hungry men too. It puts out the crazy signal like I guarantee at least one could be a serial killer, it’s weirdly hostile if you don’t know the person. A person who doesn’t take it seriously or want you to get to know them is a pass. Crazy people wanna rush (like lovebombing) because they’re not scared you’re crazy – they sense you’re not like them. But these two had ten years of interaction and he’s still stalling, like someone better is gonna come along. He has a kid, parent it rather than waste time ‘dating’.

R-type revenge

As I warned Anonymous Conservative when ebola was in the news, r-types love to get in touch during times of epidemic and express a sudden chummy desire to “catch up”. Narcissistic people are spiteful, so I’d heavily recommend avoiding contact with people you haven’t seen in a while.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/darwins-subterranean-world/202003/does-the-coronavirus-increase-sociability

They enjoy the thrill of power at weakening someone’s body.

Like sociopaths talk people into suicide, it’s legal murder.

Chris Reiber, and her colleagues (2010) found evidence for an increased social drive in young adults who have the flu during the asymptomatic early stages of the illness. In short, it looks like people who have the flu but who don’t yet know it are more likely to seek out social opportunities (such as attending parties) compared with others who are without the flu virus in their system. Think about that.

People with low disgust e.g. sluts in general, especially gay guys are also a risk and do exhibit this oddity of r-psychology.

In light of all this, it may be worth considering if the coronavirus, like the common flu, may actually have some proximate mechanisms by which it increases human sociality in an evolved (and obviously unconscious) effort to facilitate its own replication. Remember, from a Darwinian perspective, this is how natural selection rolls.

Why unconscious? Narcissists hate normal, happy people. Add healthy to that list when they’re not.

Pandemics tend to wipe out the sluts of both sexes e.g. plague in Florence because they’re happy vectors of it but their microbiome is already overwhelmed with disease so they can’t fend it off as well as normal hosts.

Slumming it – with vast savings

Rich people “slumming it” as poor people without the actual poverty are profoundly sick people.

Ancient philosophers wanted to be poor, that was the special thing. To forsake the material for God. They wanted to shun wealth, shunning possessions was simply a natural consequence because they lacked the funds to buy anything non-essential. The fear and panic of financial poverty was the motivator, not a huge house with high rent and sterile white walls. Poor people often report feeling the world move on without them, because it doesn’t care whether they live or die. They’re not important. Middle-class minimalists are quick to correct anyone who confuses their patronizing “simple living” with a growing bank account, for actual poverty, because God forbid anyone mistake them for an actual prole! I saw a woman “declutter” cutlery and glasses …but keep her Macbook and yoga “equipment”. Nobody needs yoga equipment, nobody. Indian people sleep on stone pillows and this woman also had four big, fluffy pillows and a double bed in a safe part of town. They’re such frauds.


Also, travelling the world is not minimalism. Fight me.
If the whole point is monotony then backpacking with a smartphone to feel important is an abnormal, narcissistic desire.

You’re standing at a Temple for yet more gods you don’t believe in, why should we give a shit?

I’d love it if they stuck to their religion and said “no sluts” on a sign outside. In the male-only temples, they’d be well within their religious rights and these entitled prissy people want the whole world to be degenerate like them – but also “exotic”.

Narcissists hate their misery but they lie to drag down as many people as possible. Their hatred doesn’t stop at Western traditionalists. The Eastern countries only pretend to like them for tourist money, it’ll be funny to see what happens when global liquidity peters out. Those self-loathing, skanky losers represent us, our countries and histories – and we’re a global laughing stock with backward shit-holes. We have our supposedly brightest people teaching ABCs and building toilets for inbreds.

It’s natural selection when one of these people dies of malaria or gets beaten to a bloody pulp or kidnapped by Muslims they defended online. Society should be ridiculing them but they’re too alike the journalists. I wonder what’s going to happen. Something’s gotta give.

I wish social media had a filter based on keyword because they’re all lemmings doing the same thing: whatever trendy lefties tell them to. They’re all predictably “plant based” because vegan is so 2012 and they all claim to need psychiatric medication for what sounds like SBS – spoiled bitch syndrome. Yes, I include soyboys in that estimation.

e.g.
It isn’t “sustainable” to steal clothes from poor people’s backs in charity shops, they need to be called out when they say that. The shops put the prices up and try to look like boutiques now and actual poor people have nowhere else to go. It’s almost impossible to find teenage and young adult sizes now, I feel really sorry for Zoomers. They’re fucking with the class system and it’s directly oppressing the poor. The stigma about rich people going to charity shops was in removing the finite options from people who couldn’t go anywhere else. Avoiding fast fashion is meant to mean no conspicuous consumption, not buying 10 H&M tops at a charity shop in an afternoon compared to 2 at full price!
Worst of all, they still give poor people the death stare in these places, a look of total disgust at people who.. have less.

People with a walk-in wardrobe should be ashamed of their shopping addiction, so as to leave charity shops unpicked like the vultures they are. The consequences are life ruining and nobody talks about it. My first interview suit was from a charity shop or I’d have literally had nothing (suits are high three figures for women) and had to go in casual clothes, missing the position and staying poor; and you never see pieces like that anymore, some middle-class Daddy’s credit card cunt always snaps them up for precisely two photos, to be thrown in the back of a cupboard for five years prior to the rubbish bin.

So who has the chip on their shoulder? The people who keep this country afloat thanklessly or those who feel entitled to even the comparative rags off their back?

And they wonder why normal people hate them. Whether someone’s Marxist or mathematical, one common denominator is clear: death to the middle-class. You can’t say, after all the cultural humiliation, outsourcing to immigrants, gaslighting about intelligence, preferential treatment to idiots and overall class treason and most obviously, blind eyes turned to Ottoman-style sex slavery, that it’s unjust.

The middle class is in serious need of reform, remember your race or die. Recall your loyalties or perish. Get with the programme or get out of our country, move to precious France or Germany or Sweden, see how long you last. The selling us out is to be expected, but rubbing the shekels in our faces and demanding more from indebted serf classes is just obscene. Many of those who dug our way out, somewhat, try to help our old social circles but middle-class discrimination rules rear their ugly head. There’s only so much anyone can do without systemic change. The system is both anti-merit and anti-white, can you imagine anything more unjust? Where are poor Brits supposed to go? They can’t leave their homeland for many reasons. They don’t have the mobility of immigrants, they aren’t privileged. It’s just a slow crush in the vise of multicultural lies.

One of the fastest ways to improve GDP? Stop holding down poor people who wanna work.

Shocking, I know.

Rich twits just don’t get it. “I don’t have the money” is a complete sentence.

Take up extra training? They don’t have the money.

Buy a suit? They don’t have the money.

Get a car to get a faraway job? They don’t have the money.

The poor have been taxed into financial death by globalist bullshit. Mostly for lefty bollocks like carbon emissions.

And you wonder why Brexit happened? Workers said: we wanna work!

Then there’s the Americans saying “muh democracy”. Vote our way out huh? Why didn’t we think of that?

About that…

There is no right-wing party in this country. There hasn’t been for at least half a century.

2010 on – Tories.

What are the People expected to pay?

There is no working class party either. Even UKIP was subject to entryist civnats.

Vote for whom, exactly?

There simply isn’t much to post about anymore. I’m tired of repeating myself.

The data is here if you only look. For now, we have lost. For now.

Socialism has suffocated the economy. They don’t have cars, houses or families because they’re being responsible – and who do luvvie Boomer writers blame? The latte people. Personally I’ve never been to a Starbucks and would like to keep it that way. Save five quid on a latte for fifty years, and you still can’t buy a house with it, Meredith.

Lefty Boomers keep intentionally forgetting purchasing power.

Among our own generations? A quiet sort of misery, waiting for a peaceful resolution that’ll never come. The dystopia and zombie films are no coincidence.

But we see gofundmes for somebody’s Chihuahua’s sex reassignment surgery and “marathon” donation facebook pages for fatties waddling a few feet to a buffet.

Charity shops have started turning down donations, especially suits for women and men. They want to look like boutiques and cater to the new clientele who refuse to dig through piles of tat because they have a choice, it’s disgusting. They’re throwing out more perfectly good clothes to landfill than ever before. So much for the environment, Karen. Men get even less in the way of donations although there are cheaper shops that cater to them. Call this out when you hear some little whore brag about going to charity shops “for the planet”. The mini Karens must be crushed. Slumming it is disgusting mockery of the working class (and under-class).

They donate to all sorts of poor people charities, apparently – but only the non-white ones. It’s such a bizarre inversion of the 80s yuppie more more more mentality back to the Versailles maximalism. But maximalism drags them down like their liberal fertility, how dare a family impose on their rampant cult of individualism.

TLDR This is why I buy cheap but good menswear on sale (especially shoes) and plain women’s suits in teenage sizes and donate it new to charity shops, thank you for coming to my TED talk. True story, I actually turned down the opportunity to have a TED talk. I was offered and the person running it basically owed me their job. I couldn’t think of a topic and the concept of condensing anything real for 20 minutes seems like a facile waste of time for pseudo-intellectuals.

I prefer to larp as one online.

Consider almsgiving, however you can. It could be advice to Zoomers or donating stuff but for your countrymen, do something. That’s positive patriotism.

Video: Cult psychology and lovebombing

Fight Club was about a cult, actually. Only a heavily insecure person would long for that as Family. There’s no security, it’s self-loathing – the talk.

There’s no such thing as seduction though, it’s a word Hollywood uses to excuse their abuses. The definition is a person doing what they do not want to – that’s non-consensual. Narcissists and cults do not respect you, nor your No, it’s abuse and the coercion is sadistic humiliation. The hunt – predatory.

Seduction is historically demonic.

Video: Excuses empaths make for narcissists

Urge to control hidden with lovebombing (being nice isn’t an obligation) and magically change the other person, killing the former person. Thanks, Disney’s Beauty and the Beast!

Validating bad behaviours as proof they’re needed.

Feeling superior for “catching” the predator they think they can turn into prey.

Resentment of common sense (if you don’t want them as they are, leave).

Passive aggression masquerading as gender roles (both sexes) e.g. 50s housewife incompetence or bravado complete with gaslighting put-downs around said incompetence.

http://things.justinthrelkeld.com/post/178624223456/maybe-50s-jello-food-actually-was-a-sublimated

Often they aren’t really empaths and covert narcissists pretend to be empaths.

Like autists and psychopaths (they confuse self-involvement with empathy).

Expecting a narc to love is like expecting a man with no hands to juggle.

A common female manifestation:

Intrusive people pushing into your life under the guise of “helping”.

Treating you like the problem (or a problem) and acting like your mother or shrink (power) when you made it clear you do not want this. If you were the problem, they’d want you to see a shrink or leave.

They don’t respect boundaries and try to force things as Being Nice. Those are the biggest bitches of all and to men, seem popular (and feminine, it’s fake feminine to seem less bossy) but women actually keep them at arm’s length with fake niceties to appease them. (It isn’t anything to do with appearance, contrary to what men can assume, as they’ll discover if they marry it).

It’s easy to spot Fake Nice women – does anyone take advantage of their “niceness”? If no, they’re actually a social predator. Real nice people hate the rep and people do take advantage.

It’s for your own good from such fake people is gaslighting, surely you know your own good better than someone you just met?

A common one I heard from men is “she won’t leave me alone, I feel like I’m being stalked!” yeah, because you are? If you tell someone repeatedly to back off and they don’t it’s harassment. I don’t cover female abuse enough but I feel uncomfortable knowing people may twist it or as if I’m speaking for experiences of men than just repeating.

Narcissistic male views marriage as status symbol

And a cover. It is less a yoke and more a ball and chain because they expect to take, take take and never give (even their gender role) unless they expect more in return – so not a union, more like running a business.

Good marriages aren’t a scoreboard.

Being married isn’t an achievement, you signed your name. It isn’t a status to hit others with like a rhetorical weapon. A good marriage is an achievement but I guarantee the married men bitching about single women don’t have one of those. Shouldn’t you be with your family than wasting time online? It’s un-Biblical, they’re bad husbands. They cherish every woman BUT their wife. (And they deny their body belongs to their wife).

The Madonna/Whore complex means they are emotionally impotent with their own wife. They hate her because she is his wife. (Because they hate themselves, thus resent her for loving him).

They don’t have empathy, they can’t love (even themselves). They can only imitate and parody i.e. seduction, “romance” cliches, while acting out of sync behind the mark’s back (lying, confabulated memory, cheating). It’s ALL superficial so they intend to lovebomb, mirror (to seem like a soulmate) and trick “good” women into the trap of legal union (personality disorders do this all the time, usually the mask doesn’t slip until after the wedding so long courtship had the old role of filtering them out). The prey can’t escape.

There is usually gaslighting during courtship into codependency (or deeper from an already codependent woman) so he uses the woman for supply before the marriage but she views it as emotional intimacy (wrong*), taking advantage of the novelty of the situation and fact she hasn’t seen all his sides (not informed consent). They don’t even know how bitter he is until after marriage, typically (because he is running off her supply so it doesn’t come out). These are later the divorced guys who act like innocent maidens attacked by the dragon of divorce and warn all men off marriage because they personally sucked at it. (Husband is a job so they devalue it once it turns out to be, you know, WORK).

Psychopaths are best known for doing that bait and trap thing with marriage, we need strict legal protections from such people (men and women both) and psychopaths are the most pathological narcissist.

There are plenty of good videos on that channel, including ones about women and traits the narcissist seeks to take for themselves via relationships, as an emotional vampire.

Oh, and they always cheat in marriage. They claim all men are similarly weak or “unhappy” because they don’t like other men either, thinking of other men as happy, faithful or good husbands would kill them on the inside.

So when no-fault divorce is over, they’ll be screwed twice!

Marriages require both parties to have emotional maturity (cooperation, compromise) so any union with a narcissist in it is doomed, even if the other party is a literal Saint. Naturally, it’s never their fault, like any incompetent person so they get married again and again and make the same “mistakes” again and again but there’s no agency involved apparently.

They were innocent victims of the vagina, as they purchased a ring and got down on one knee and said things they didn’t mean and spent months planning and turned up to say some lines and where, oh, where, did they go wrong?

They’re never wrong, according to them. Despite how their life is always a mess.

They’ll claim men are leaders in a marriage but resent the business of actually leading.

This is the guy who’ll claim to be traditional but hates religion and has a long, long line of “exes” you’re not “allowed” to “judge”. They’re such hypocrites they’re a walking joke.

*Emotional labour is real and doing too much of it (for two whole people) can kill a woman (stress x disease risk) or, rarely, a man. Commonly, a man is killed by stress at work (physical labour) but a woman’s lifespan is shortened by stress at home (emotional labour) so who a woman marries can literally be life or death, it can be the difference of a happy life and extra decades. Women need this information.

I’d bet good money that Type A men have an unhappy marriage and the woman has a similar disease risk profile. A married man’s primary responsibility is to his wife and until society pushes this point hard, men won’t try. They’ll ignore the marriage for career, friends, addiction (workaholism is the socially desirable addiction though). If the man won’t Be the Man, nothing the woman does will succeed. Men shirk their duties, abandon the home (literally or spiritually) and what can a woman do about that? Force him? No! Then she’s being the man!

And random but when society values women’s happiness and feminine energy levels over her contribution to GDP, we’ll be nicer overall. EVERYBODY WINS.

I’ve seen feminine women mocked by other women (envy) and torn down by men (who knows it’s easier to bed a High T harridan). Pick your poison, guys. Either you want women to earn their keep and be a whore in your bedroom or you want a docile purer kind and shun the former. You can’t expect mutual exclusives, it’s impossible. And you have to be worthy of the woman you want or it won’t last.

Funny example

One guy I spoke to said he liked “traditional women” but he also filtered FOR a “career woman”.

His words. He thought this was clever. He wanted the status of her “achievements”, you see.

When pressed (and I was pressed myself at the ignorance), he said he expected a woman to have a “good” (secure) job (be locked in), and have “at least” a middle-class salary. I just told him he sounded like a woman… from the 50s.

He literally did, I swear, there were other details that sealed it e.g. sexual experience. Why would any sane man want a wife who’s had more fun with other men?

He insisted there was no contradiction or way this could possibly backfire on him. That, my friends, is the idiot in action. When I pointed out those are impossible values systems, polar opposites, he claimed a traditional woman would be “bad in bed” (like you can’t teach them?) and “lazy” for not wanting an office job. The feminist propaganda has sunk into men the deepest.

They feel entitled to seek their male qualities in their wife.

That’s dysfunctional and you can’t convince me otherwise.

How lazy! What, is he going to take on the female role and give birth?

He only claimed to want trad because it’s the current status symbol, because he likes the idea of it and the supply it might give him. He married an SJW. She cooks sometimes and “lets him” tradlarp. He’s a moron. The woman who is cautious is feminine, there’s no rush – the woman desperate for a husband, any husband, is using you.

I have betting odds on his divorce. Easy money.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/16/why-wont-women-be-right-wing/

As it is, hypersexualised porno society has made women very masculine, higher T. They also need it to defend themselves in a low trust, multiculti society and that, naturally, never gets a mention. Unsafe society = everyone gets more aggressive. Sort out the former and the latter reverts.

We’re cultural refugees, in a way. Pining for a world that doesn’t exist.

We live in the dishonour culture, where people who act like whores aren’t ashamed of it, they’re proud. With freedom of association, we could avoid these people (m/f).

Not every man who wants to get married would be a good husband. Sometimes they want a slave to abuse but in the Bible such treatment (like property, like using a machine or a PA, housekeeper) instead of the equal yoke, to love and to cherish, was grounds for divorce. So nope, they can’t hide behind religion…. unless we can stone them for adultery (lawsuits were less bloody).

Trad test: what should be the punishment for adultery?

Trads know adultery is a crime. To “commit” adultery demands punishment.