UK Universities want to lie and say Africans were here first

http://mantalk.mobi/British-Universities-Change-History-by-Teaching-Students-Africans-Were-First-Settlers

Some of the most reputable British educators have been corrupting the minds of young students by lying about the roots of their country. They have suggested teaching a course which is built out of the lies of insecure minorities that feel a white Great Britain shouldn’t be a cornerstone of its history but, rather, its history should reflect the morals of current society. The course which I’m referring to teaches students that the first British settlers were actually Africans. This, of course, is nothing more than bullshit which should be shamed, but since the story has been published, little to no changes have been made. The deplorable act of revising a nation’s history and culture were not done because of new discoveries which demanded the history book accommodate the new findings but, instead, the changes were made as a way to dethrone the white Englishman in his own country.

It’s such a barefaced lie.

It fails on every factual level.

Even if that were true hypothetically, they’d have evolved lighter skin and so on. Making it false still.

Nothing scares them like the truth on anthropological origins (Multi-Regional).

The politically driven curriculum will be distributed to thousands of students at Oxford and Cambridge who believe they are getting an objective history. Instead, they are being fed a Marxist fairy tale that never happened. The course’s creator shamelessly admits the whole perspective is made up, fabricated and absolutely fiction; however, feels it’s important that the English population address their ‘white male-dominated’ view of history and society.

As opposed to current academia, which is totally true?

What’s next, since they’re pushing We Wuz Kangs Afrocentrism? Magic Melanin Theory?

RIP, peer review

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/scientistry-is-not-scientody.html

He also went on to call himself out in a sense, stating that journal editors aid and abet the worst behaviours, that the amount of bad research is alarming, that data is sculpted to fit a preferred theory. He goes on to observe that important confirmations are often rejected and little is done to correct bad practices. What’s worse, much of what goes on could even be considered borderline misconduct.

N is for Narrative.

No Noooooo are you kidding me wtf are you testing me satan

Signal Boost, Video: Why are people calling Zoe Quinn a whore?

Hopefully this video answers some questions going around, because for some reason she’s gone silent.
She cheated – for her career, repeatedly, and at present she’s trying to silence the entire internet about it. Public interest, dear. Public interest.
I personally like the part where she lies about being queer. It might be quite common among feminists. And if the allegation from her ex, that she raped him is true (we know she harassed someone at a wedding), she is a loathsome creature.

here’s some screencaps

BONUS jab