The future American

Deport them all or say bye to your country.

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/15/668106376/generation-z-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-yet

A “bare majority,” the report notes, of 52 percent are non-Hispanic white, compared to 61 percent of millennials in 2002 when they were in the same age range.

There’s much more Hispanic and Asian presence among the nation’s children and youth today,” says Richard Fry, a senior research at Pew who co-authored the report with Kim Parker.

I hear the locust of the apocalypse. It smells like soy sauce.

Nearly half of post-Millennials are racial or ethnic minorities

Assuming 100% of them were “Christian”, your cultural, political and genetic futures are still dead.

CHINO is multicultural Christianity, and it’s bullshit. An Italian Christian is not an English Christian is not a Syrian Christian is not a Jamaican Christian is not a Chink Christian. That’s multiculturalism via the back door.

Chromosomes make culture, as HBD study proves.

i.e. Asians will never be honorary whites.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894685/

With obvious consequence:

Jesus said to spread the Word, not mix genetics. God split the languages and the peoples on PURPOSE.

UK K-shift

I’ve never posted exact numbers, have I?

Let me show you your debt slavery.

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/breakdown

70% extra taxes – the going rate for dysgenics. Oh, you’re paying for it.

45% top tax rate not including other stuff.

I include the calculations for the morons who’ll dispute maths.

70*0.45 = 31.5%

over a third of your time working is slaving away for people who don’t want to.

Like we do?

Sorry Susan, we’re not supporting your ability to watch Loose Women and bitch about your grandkids. Tough titties that you paid for wine and cruises over retirement savings. Guess you should’ve thought about that when you voted for Labour without waver the past half a century.

But wait, there’s more!

There’s a reason I’m so optimistic this country will literally run out of shekels before we can be replaced fully.

Millennial exhaustion!

Plan on a 50 year ‘career’?

50*.315

15.75 years working like a slave because Barry the Boomer won’t get off his arse.

That’s right.

I am this way because of statistics and facts.

I crunched the numbers one day and the results were in, literally Hitler.

Can you use a calculator? When did you decide to become a shitlord?

Go Galt and grow your own food, you won’t eat litres of pesticide per year and you’ll have saved more money than if you ‘worked’ and got taxed to pay for food that will also be taxed. While supporting the EU. Where the companies are taxed. However, if you can get the fruit of their labour on steep sale, dehydrators are worth the money plus free seeds.

https://tomclothier.hort.net/page05.html

Also great for making bar fruit.

Better food, less money, more free time. Problem?

Look at every expense necessary for life like this. Through the filters of time and tax.

Do not fund your own replacement.

Now you catch my drift, back to UK official stats.

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/spending_chart_2010_4UKb_00t
Yes, this is sustainable waste.
https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/year_spending_2020UKbt_17bc1n_001040#ukgs302

Don’t look at the statistics.

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_national_debt_analysis
It’s immigrants, but blame the economy. For the economy.

“In 2005 the UK National Debt was less that £0.5 trillion.

But then came the worldwide financial crisis of 2008 and subsequent recession.

The National Debt increased rapidly and went over £1 trillion in 2011 and over £1.5 trillion in 2016. At the end of March 2019 the National Debt was £1.80 trillion.

Obviously, they can’t do that again.

+50% in five years? Under the Tories? Fucking really?

11 years of total immigration flood, tripled national debt. Complete coincidence.

(Net immigration means nothing).

Odious debt must be repudiated. Exit tax the immvaders. Good enough for CA.

In terms of Gross Domestic Product the UK National Debt in 2005 was about 38 percent of GDP.

But in the last ten years, in the wake of the Crash of 2008 and subsequent recession, the National has doubled to over 80 percent GDP, but is leveling out as a percent of GDP. At the end of March 2019 the National Debt was 84.6 percent of GDP.”

Thanks, Labour! Commies ruin economies.

And this is what they claim as debt, not the full sum.

As previously stated, we’re screwed.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

Plus, at around 90% GDP drops anyway (known economic effect) because the populace strangely isn’t as productive…….

Huh.

Turns out THIS is our socialist utopia.

War-time debt/GDP, what kinda war do you call this?

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/rev/google_vis.php?title=Total%20Debt%20As%20Percent%20GDP&year=2006_2019&sname=&units=p&bar=1&stack=1&size=800_600&spending0=36.67_37.25_38.86_49.14_65.47_72.01_75.90_79.75_82.17_83.69_83.73_86.72_86.17_84.60&legend=Public%20Net%20Debt-total&source=a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a


Austerity is a hilarious myth.

It’s right fucking there.

And note: 2009 debt/GDP is still under 50%, don’t blame Muh Recession.

Pensions are welfare, at least a UBI wouldn’t be ageist. It isn’t a military pension, you don’t earn national funds by existing. Breathing for 60 solar rotations isn’t a qualification.

Young people can’t marry, move out, have kids, because lazy bastards didn’t want to work for the last 40 years of their life, preferring to abort their kids or make immigrants pay for them. We all literally know people who’ve been retired longer than they worked, fiscally impossible to justify.

One lazy generation who didn’t even fight a war for us is disabling the future existence of our people and culture.

When the Boomers pass, this shitshow will really get on the road.

America can’t afford more socialism

Note the rounds of 19th century and early 20th century immigration led to debt spikes?

Third Worlders in the First World are just economic parasites. It’s IQ and high time preference.

Spoiled privileged Yang truly promises a Boomer bailout of mortgages via a blisteringly obvious planned rent hike* (since all the poor would suddenly be good for it) and you don’t need extra ‘money’ to end the welfare cliff. It’s a pen stroke away to step the payments down gradually.

America’s net worth is negative too, more socialism will cause hyperinflation – and then, invasion.

People ate leather sofas in Weimar Germany and licked wallpaper glue.

Allegedly they ate babies. This would be mathematically worse.

What’s to stop the sneaky QE of UBI leading to price raises across the board from all sectors? Especially food.

Nothing. That’s what.

People are celebrating a termite in their savings.

UBI: It’s the missing link between inflation and hyperinflation.

The ‘basic’ is a clue. It’ll go on basics – 1. rent, 2. food, 3. medical.

“Universal” – you have no choice whether to go into debt. No choice. But rich people will get a bailout, no means testing. Fair? About inequality? No and no.

The distance between the poor guy with $0 and the rich guy with a million will be exactly the same if you give both two grand. Perhaps higher, because increasing monetary supply directly causes one thing.

Prices will rise. Regardless of specific agents e.g. landlords.

So spending power of the poor guy will decrease.

Go ahead, vote for it. I wanna see what happens.

You cannot consider income without expense.

It’s an equation, it has two sides.

If only there were an economic law to explain this concept, of supplying and demanding…

*The average hippy American Boomer seriously considers their house their pension. That is factual.

Map the top chart onto spending power, I dare you.

Tell Yang you’ll have UBI under one condition: rent controls. He won’t do it.

Debt jubilee for national debt?

I mean actual national debt, not reported with exclusions.

https://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/world-news/the-debt-jubilee-the-solution-for-governments-to-avoid-the-next-economic-disaster/

What else could they do?

PAY it?

Of course, the obvious way for billions of people to pay “their” debt to like, ten people, is to arrange about two gallows’ worth of payment.

That’s the other traditional route. Answering the age-old question: how long is a piece of rope?

A culture without honour doesn’t honour others’ debts.

Bank deposits caused by banks

https://washingtonsblog.com/2014/03/bank-england-admits-loans-come-first-deposits-follow.html

Money creation.

“Money” not value or productivity.

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q1prereleasemoneycreation.pdf

Monopoly has fewer IOUs.

Broad money is a measure of the total amount of money held by households and companies in the economy. Broad money is made up of bank deposits — which are essentially IOUs from commercial banks to households and companies — and currency — mostly IOUs from the central bank. Of the two types of broad money, bank deposits make up the vast majority — 97% of the amount currently in circulation. And in the modern economy, those bank deposits are mostly created by commercial banks themselves.

***

Commercial banks create money, in the form of bank deposits, by making new loans.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

The immigrants and foreigners in Buy to Let have gotta be my favourite.

Yes, give the nice Yiddish man your shorts. They want to make you “easy money” at their expense.

This description of money creation contrasts with the notion that banks can only lend out pre-existing money, outlined in the previous section. Bank deposits are simply a record of how much the bank itself owes its customers. So they are a liability of the bank, not an asset that could be lent out. A related misconception is that banks can lend out their reserves. Reserves can only be lent between banks, since consumers do not have access to reserves accounts at the Bank of England.

The Muslims thinking they’ve robbed us will get a nasty shock.

Those weren’t smiling white people.

Nobody screws the Jew. N O B O D Y.

Singapore not such a good option

They claim to be libertarian so the rich move there, then they can “confiscate” their money a la Cyprus.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-the-snowball-of-government-debt/

All these numbers are low-balling it severely. Please, read the ones listed in order, the conclusions are unexpected but true.

Debt to GDP (and some debt is counted in GDP too).

Canada 90%

Congo 131%

Italy 132%

Greece 182%

Japan 238%

UK 88%

Singapore 111%, not a typo, minimum

Cyprus 98%

Spain 98%

You’d be better off moving to Cyprus, literally.

They’re worse than Canada and Brazil.

Nobody asks what will happen to national debt?

I’d like to see debt by continent.

Most of the worst offenders (by population density) seem to be in Asia, remember debt is distributed per person, so a country with a billion people is in much deeper shit.

e.g. India 71%

All that economic potential of a billion people, it shouldn’t be that high.

Read a few more, in context.

Poland 51%

Rwanda 41%

Ireland 69%

Finland, Israel 61%

Colombia 49%

Malta 51%

Latvia 36%

Turkey 28%

Namibia 41%

Sweden 41%

Brazil 84%

Austria 79% etc.

This might not make sense looking through a racial lens.

The problem is socialism. Your national IQ means nothing if you’re lazy.*

It’s a one-trip pony, then the pony must be turned into Ikea meatballs.

It makes the people lazy. The biggest culprit, like falling Rome, is pensions.

AKA enslavement of children.

https://www.businessinsider.com/greece-germany-pensions-2010-4?r=US&IR=T

Years of work to earn a full pension;

Greece: 35

Germany: 45

This is theft. This is genocidal.

Proportion of wages as pension;

Greece: 80%

Germany: 46%

Maximum Payment;

Greece: €2538

Germany: €2100

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jun/15/unsustainable-futures-greece-pensions-dilemma-explained-financial-crisis-default-eurozone

You know it’s bad when the Guardian calls you a dependent culture.

The old living off the blood of the young, who suddenly can’t afford to move out, marry, have replacement level children (plus their taxes also go to immigrants, to do those things instead). Ironically, we’d better hope this is resolved soon, while Europe can bounce back with pre-WW2 numbers. It isn’t (strictly) racial, it’s about entitlement.

Gen X isn’t bothering to save for the greedy section of Boomers (sadly most) and Gen Y know they won’t retire at all.

https://www.financialsamurai.com/why-you-should-not-retire-early/

Not everything is about race.

*However, a lot of white people are striking (Best Post) from a genuine contribution to their current Western ‘culture’, the void of multiculturalism, that hates their very existence. That isn’t lazy.

Why is the UK property market fake?

https://cyberlibris.typepad.com/blog/files/Goodharts_Law.pdf

No more corset controls on the banks since 1979/80. Goodhart pre-empted it.

Now they loan to things that don’t boost GDP including mortgages.

It’s included in debt to GDP though.

Boosted in addition to the retarded notion of a crumbling hovel being a “retirement” fund.

Funds and other assets don’t depreciate.

Don’t bail out bad property investors, they’re idiots.

You wanted the reward, the risk is also ALL yours.

The ‘competition and credit control’ reforms, which removed direct controls on bank
lending, had been introduced in September 1971 and a dramatic surge in bank
intermediation, leading to broad money growth rates in excess of 25%, had resulted in
1972 and 1973. The conclusion drawn by policy makers in 1973 was that the only
option was to supplement monetary targets with direct controls on banks through
Supplementary Special Deposits known as ‘the Corset’ (See Zawadzki, 1981).
Modest interest rate changes seemed powerless in the face of this monetary expansion
and the previously stable money demand function seemed to have broken down. This
was clear well before 1975, but Goodhart (1975b) was a summary of the current
problems of monetary management, as the title suggests.

So Labour want rent controls but not bank controls.

I wonder (((why))).

Goodhart’s Law is the statement missing from the square brackets in the quotation
above. It says: “Ignoring Goodhart’s law, that any observed statistical regularity
will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes”.

“Houses as Collateral”
https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/02v08n1/0205aoki.pdf
“First were the removal of exchange controls in 1979 and the direct control of bank lending (“the corset”) in 1980″

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.600.6032&rep=rep1&type=pdf
“The abolition of exchange controls in 1979 and the abolition of the last of the quantitative controls on bank lending heralded a period of rapid deregulation and increased competition in British banking during the 1980s”

They weren’t more productive in the 80s, they stole from the future (you).