Socialists in science trying to avoid being scientific

http://quillette.com/2017/07/06/social-sciences-undergoing-purity-spiral/

You picked the wrong fucking field to have feelings.
Especially if those feelings involve censorship of facts you disagree with.
Do you know how many people continue to object to evolution?
Still true. We can see a fetus undergo the stages of evolution in real time.
It’ll never not be true.
We’ve found plenty of Missing Links, and Creationists move the goalposts.
That’s crazy, like suppressing crime and IQ data.

Scientism isn’t real, whatever your false idols tell you. They’re false by nature.

Nurture, as you call it, is mostly measurement error.

You are wrong in MATHS.

Only now, at the end, do they understand.

The multicultural experiment (official media term) was always going to fail because their core premise was that human nature itself could be controlled and experimentally manipulated.

Yeah… people rebel against that.

And it was just colonialism in reverse, instead of going to the poor people to feel superior (missions), they come crawling to you.

“What’s interesting about Haidt’s alternative interpretation of the liberal progress narrative is that he mentions two elements central to the narrative—private property and nations. And what has happened to a large extent is that as the failures of communism have become increasingly apparent many on the left—including social scientists—have shifted their activism away from opposing private property and towards other aspects, for example globalism.”

There’s no such thing as globalism, it’s a void of values. Like there’s no one language, a single language would be the starting point.
Empires unite nations, that’s why the British Empire taught everyone English.
It’s the best language, so you’re still using it.
Globalization has failed because the East has outcompeted the West. A world without white people will not be dumb enough to hand the enemy in various wars your very factories for slightly cheaper Nikes.
In real terms, they bred more, we paid for it and called it ‘aid’ and the future belongs to them barring famine.
Accept your death began with manufacturing. You gave away future prosperity, that’s gonna affect the birth rates.

“But how do we know a similarly disastrous thing is not going to happen with globalism as happened with communism? What if some form of national and ethnic affiliation is a deep-seated part of human nature, and that trying to forcefully suppress it will eventually lead to a disastrous counter-reaction? What if nations don’t create conflict, but alleviate it? What if a decentralised structure is the best way for human society to function?”

…If?

IF.

jesus my sides

genophilia is a dictionary word

ingroup preference is a well-studied phenomena

genetic diaspora exist, ask HBD chick

they’re so close to the pendulum of r/K, aren’t they?

nations formed of genetic tribes to alleviate conflict when weaponry advanced and made mass slaughter possible but, duh, undesirable, ask a forensic anthro or any evo biologist

hell, ask sacred cow Dawkins if supranationalism, the true name for globalism, is even genetically possible
chimps can’t do it, softy peaceable chimpanzee frequently murder one another for literally no reason than territory
it’s been filmed, I’ve seen it

“What if the type of mass-scale immigration

dictionary definition of invasion met but ok

even without weapons, you can ‘rape’ a nation’s women and state coffers (“economic migrants” literally invaders) and that is their intention

search weapons cache European mosque or something like it
happens all over
just the ones we find

currently occurring in Europe,

meanwhile, Christian genocide in MENA too

Look! A distraction!

containing relatively large amounts of people with different nationalities, cultures, and religions, is going against some of the core features of human nature?

Show me one place multiculturalism in history hasn’t involved a genocide at some point.
ONE.
Look up Neanderthals, it’s now in our blood because it’s the reason we’re here and they’re not.

Maybe it isn’t, but if it is, do we have to wait until after the fact to say ‘well, globalism doesn’t work’, as we did with communism? Surely there is a better way.”

Picking up a fucking history book?

The burden of proof was on the pushers. They never did. Not even in their neighbourhoods or schools. The People never consented. When asked (see Brexit), they reject it.

Like the Unis in general, the social sciences only have a shit reputation now liberals are running it.

Coincidence, this is not.

Oxytocin promotes patriotism

It is the love hormone because love also means protection.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3029708/

“Grounded in the idea that ethnocentrism also facilitates within-group trust, cooperation, and coordination, we conjecture that ethnocentrism may be modulated by brain oxytocin, a peptide shown to promote cooperation among in-group members.”

Have we found the hormone for the k-selected?

The higher oestrogen of women (general finding) depresses amygdala (stress) activity (this is written up on wikipedia if you want to link-follow) but oxytocin release increases amygdala stimulation over the top of the oestrogen signal, which is otherwise fine and generally neuroprotective (presumably so we don’t miscarry when a shadow looks like a guy).

So maybe the way to get women caring less about the ‘refugees’ and remember their personal safety is now their job, not a husband, is to pass out free oxytocin nasal sprays?

Or put it in the water supply?

I’m kinda serious. It’s crazy enough to work.
Compassion fatigue already set in years ago, ride the wave and reduce the maternal clucking of middle-age Boomers.

I wonder if military service induces oxytocin release for male-male bonding?

“Results show that oxytocin creates intergroup bias because oxytocin motivates in-group favoritism and, to a lesser extent, out-group derogation. These findings call into question the view of oxytocin as an indiscriminate “love drug” or “cuddle chemical” and suggest that oxytocin has a role in the emergence of intergroup conflict and violence.”

K-shift…?

Dare I dream?

It doesn’t mention that when ANY ingroup meets ANY outgroup, the natural result is competition because Darwin.
It isn’t a choice or a value judgement. War happens constantly, it is the norm. When modern food supply runs low, it’ll come back, roaring back, bigger and badder than ever. We’re in the experiment.
Race to survive, anyone?

You might remember there was a BS flurry in the MSM about a chemical that reduces ‘racism’ – this was it.

It doesn’t – because ‘ingroup preference’ (the positive social term, along with the lesser known and more genetic genophilia) is totally natural. They stupidly assumed they could extend the ingroup to literally everyone in the whole world. The brain resists this, that’s why they haven’t drugged us all by now.

 

Since among other findings;

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122242/

It increases patriotism for one’s culture and love of one’s family.

It changed freedom of association to genetic kin and love of the flag but not corporations.
It studies Asians which is a hiccup but hormones tend to have broad effects.

The men of society love strength in their social group of other men.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193946

It also leads to monogamy and fidelity – in MEN.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152592

Ding ding ding K-type central.

“Together, our results suggest that where OXT release is stimulated during a monogamous relationship, it may additionally promote its maintenance by making men avoid signaling romantic interest to other women through close-approach behavior during social encounters. In this way, OXT may help to promote fidelity within monogamous human relationships.”

I would bet that sluts, the promiscuous with higher and higher N counts, with damaged pair bonding, release less.

More studies on whites and women needed but otherwise, great work.
Nature is literally against these ‘social engineers’, too kind a term, for penpushers and petty meddlers.

New fave GIF, will get a lot of use.

BTW the primary source of oxytocin in humans would be ..the nuclear family. You’d have to knock that out to bring multiculturalism in.

Death is genetic

Especially in the selfish, so the self-destructiveness of liberals (drugs, homosexuality, abortion, STDs) really is a feature, not a bug.

We already know sexual selection is genetic (r/K, HBD inheritance) so obviously natural is too.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/we-are-programmed-to-die-early-and-thats-a-good-thing

If death is gene-mediated, then who is programmed to live longer, r-types or Ks?

“Bar-Yam and his colleagues are arguing that natural selection actually favors traits that self-limit consumption and reproduction, not selfish maximalism, including lifespan limiting mortality. In other words, organisms may be able to have longer lifespans than they presently do, but natural selection has actually favored individuals that clock themselves out early.”

Unclear. Probably K but the variables are iffy.

They’re partially basing off the false idea that more reproduction is always good/favoured by evolution when actually it was responding to the selection pressure of high mortality. Now mortality is low, they should include quality, the alpha genes for the race between the sexes.
Fitness is not N children, that only applies when there is competition from r-types.

Sexual competition.

In a vacuum, K is superior for a society.

Empires rise with K, die with r.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/05/29/rk-is-timeless/

“Aside from August Weismann—who in 1882 did actually argue that death was programmed—it’s because when they considered the effect of evolutionary selection, they were taking averages across organisms and their environments instead of considering each individual organism in its local context. By removing the individual from its particular place or location within a given population, this average ignores the complex relationship between that individual and its environment.”

READ DARWIN.

“By looking at how an individual’s local context affects their fitness, Bar-Yam and his colleagues were able to show that traits which may be an advantage in the short-term (such as an individual’s longevity or ‘selfish’ resource consumption) can actually be a significant disadvantage in the long term, and vice versa.”

Implying it’s bad for the nation, the wider genetic kin group or thede.

Nature is nationalist.

“While this may work out well for the most selfish individuals in the short term, if Bar-Yam and his colleagues are correct it could be cataclysmic for our species in the long run.
“What people do affects their environment and that affects their ability to survive,” said Bar-Yam. “This is something we’re all well aware of today. If you overexploit your resources, you’re going to be in trouble.”‘

MALTHUS, she said, screaming into the void.

“As Bar-Yam points out, if death is genetically programmed, that also means it can probably be hacked.”

The problem with the autistic, they assume they know better than nature. They don’t even know what all these genes do in all conditions and they want to go chopping them out with CRISPR. You know why CF spread? It protects you from TB.

For those who know jack-shit about evolution: the vast majority of mutations are bad, not just bad but fatal (anti-fitness, dysgenic) and that’s why it’s good when nature throws away the genetic equivalent of a shitty doodle on scrunched-up paper. That’s why humans evolved to die quickly, to spread up the overall rate of mutation as a species but also to conserve gains quickly too with shorter generational duration (more breeding in same time).

How many people deserve to live that long? Will it include youth or the shit years, extended for centuries? Who wants to slave away for centuries, cos they can’t financially retire? Biohacking is fraught with technical issues.

The future of FN

When I predicted a Le Pen getting in next time, I wasn’t really thinking of the one doing the concession speech. Probably an advisor though.

Even the SJW swamp of the Independent is admitting this. So I can be upfront.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/marine-le-pen-defeat-emmanuel-macron-front-national-en-marche-french-elections-a7723211.html

Can you have a shared society without homogeneity?

Historically, it’s doubtful.

Diversity+Proximity = War

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/07/determined-build-shared-society-everyone/

“But our mission to build a stronger, fairer Britain goes further. For while the obvious injustices often receive a lot of attention – after all, politicians have been talking the language of social justice and social mobility for years – the everyday injustices that ordinary working class families feel are too often overlooked.”
“So when you see others prospering while you are not; when you try to raise your concerns but they fall on deaf ears; when you feel locked out of the political and social discourse and feel no one is on your side, resentments grow, and the divisions that we see around us – between a more prosperous older generation and a struggling younger generation; between the wealth of London and the rest of the country; between the rich, the successful and the powerful, and their fellow citizens – become entrenched.”

Wait until you tell them the bad news on retirement and the NHS, in ‘humanitarian crisis‘ because mysteriously, we have too many newcomers using it. In a country with sub-replacement fertility, they aren’t coming from here… and they won’t stay here when the gibs stop flowing. They’ll leave, going ‘home’ as they call it, and take a net loss from this country with them. With remittance, the gap would be vast. These people are leeches on their home nation too, that is why they were forced to leave. Stop caring about being called ‘racist’ by traitors selling us out to NGOs unless you want to become the British Merkel.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jan/06/nhs-faces-humanitarian-crisis-rising-demand-british-red-cross

The system wasn’t designed for this, and WILL break if the flow of r-types breeding at African levels don’t slow their roll. Children are not cash dispensers from the taxpayer.

We have bigamy laws, we should NOT be paying for multiple ‘wives’ aka breeding sows. Look up Calhoun’s rats, they overbreed and end up like Africa, perma-war mass-rape too many men, not enough war to cull them Africa.

Entitlements only exist for a surplus economy (unlikely with the average national IQs of the people being let in) and many of the takers did not pay into the system, neither did their family because they weren’t here, they are ‘entitled’ to nothing. Such people are chancers, locusts who consume until the seed crop is lost and you can grow no more. Don’t give mansions in London (or any social housing in London, it’s a privilege to live there) to people who deliberately produced 8-10 children they couldn’t afford. Don’t go easy on crime, punishments protect the People and it’ll be seen as a weakness.

Nothing will redpill left-wing Millennial voters to conservatism faster than realizing they won’t get the things upper generations got easily (full NHS coverage, to retire full stop, a good economy where there isn’t foreign competition or factories going overseas, cheap housing to expand into, no terrorism or gang violence or Sharia patrols harassing women).

“From tackling the increasing lack of affordability in housing, fixing broken markets to help with the cost of living, and building a great meritocracy where every child has the opportunity of a good school place, we will act across every layer of society to restore the fairness that is the bedrock of the social solidarity that makes our nation strong.”

Family formation etc are particular generational problems I hope she addresses, it’s important for the economy too, many responsible people are putting it off cos they just can’t afford it.

You can’t have nationalism without national loyalty and it’s a typical conservative error to assume that anyone living in this country and profiting from it, is primarily loyal to this country.

Civic nationalism. The Alt Lite’s tactic of denying biology (HBD differences) and history (war and invasion and colonization). Will it go far enough?

Queenie supported Leave, Trump is pro-America

I like the news recently.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/the-queen-reportedly-said-she-backed-brexit-in-the-run-up-to-the-eu-referendum-2016-12

Obviously the sovereign supports sovereignty.

yes nod sup Lestat IWTV film uhuh I know

The nose knows.

This one’s to you, your Majesty.

ah yes toast drinking damon ian nodding

She never lets me down.

Bess is bae.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/trumps-inauguration-speech-will-be-authored-by-stephen-miller-2016-12

A Pro-American President is meant to be a shock?

A patriotic national leader, the horror!

Next, he’ll be putting Americans before the globalist (capitalist) dream!

Like, people > money! What a monster!

Seriously, I’ll say the same about him as I said about Obama. As long as he’s a good President, I don’t care who he is.

Link: Plausible reasons behind Trump’s success

Plausible reasons behind Trump’s success
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-trumps-rise-that-no-one-talks-about/

To those ignored, suffering people, Donald Trump is a brick chucked through the window of the elites. “Are you assholes listening now?”

Class Revolution.

What all those socialists in ivory towers WANTED.

Yes it’s a response to classism, an orderly protest and what happened? These people are so spoiled, they caused public damage. It isn’t coming out of Democrat’s taxes because they don’t pay any! You really think RDJ payed full tax on his billions? The welfare family looting together, shooting together?

These people were anti-white, virulently, so the natural reaction to this, equal and opposite, was to vote in the whitest guy they could find.

It’s also a response to racism, true. What a lot of people don’t know is that class is the polite term for the genetic caste system of proper marriage. Take the blue-bloods of Europe.

Hey, if you wanna understand any revolution, look at the French. The rich die, the poor win. This is a death of relevance and they should be thanking the proles’ mercy. This is gonna escalate because they don’t get it, these people have the power. They are the ones that mean those Hollywood celebrities get that big paycheck, they grow the food and work in the factories and protect the country. They are your bodyguards. Your police, your army, your admin.

In the immortal words of Fight Club:

Do not fuck with us.

The mobilization of this force without a word of consensus has shit up the Emperors wearing no clothes. A sense of injustice and personal slight. Nobody asked what was triggering to the majority. Their impotence is visible for all to see. They never had power, it was an illusion gifted by all those working hard beneath them. What was it Romney said? 47% of parasites, wasn’t it? Say, in a democracy, that’s a mighty fine number.

The rest have been patiently listening as they got in from overtime.

They’ve been degraded and told to hate themselves, their children and to love their would-be murderers, rapists and thieves.

Reminds me of a song

fuck you I won’t do what you tell me

If they were the Joker, they’d be burning that pile of Clinton cash right about now.

It isn’t about the money. It’s about sending a message.

If this is ignored or worse, further doubled-down like typical SJW short-sightedness, other measures will become necessary and they’ll like those even less.

Identity politics say to love everything except your class and country.
We noticed. We’re upset.

Begs the Q. You can tell millions of Americans are thinking…

Then what the (beep) are you doing with our money?

Update: I read his other article, some thoughts.

Why should we help the outgroup?

Every SJW asks that we waste OUR finite precious life on THEIR emotional fulfillment. Why?
They act like they can’t do it alone. Why need us? Why force us by various intrusive laws?

Why is there no logical reason to stand up for that question?

There are two types of poor, remember. For a modern example on another topic, Cindy who got hooked on coke at parties isn’t the same as a crack baby that had no choice. You are responsible for YOURSELF and your ACTIONS. That is individual agency. The system isn’t supported to support personal failure. You were raised with Don’t, you were warned, you were told and it wasn’t personal or trivial, it’s because a society is built on resistance to the entropy of social and cultural degeneration caused by those individual actions in large numbers. In short, no, it’s not about you. The civic is good for everyone, literally. If you think it’s hard to follow the rules, it’s harder to live in a society which has rejected them. Your reward for stupidity is the consequence. Other adults are not here to bail you out. We’re your peers, you are our equal, you said.

Why should we help the outgroup?

History shows it doesn’t work, it leads to blame and war. Ingrates ruin everything. They destroy what they could’ve never built, see post-apartheid Africa, if you can peer through the smoke of that smoldering crater. The people who complain about the problem e.g. ghettos, are the people making the problem. It’s them. It’s the same demographic of people. The people living in Saudi Arabia make it a sexist shithole. The bad teachers make the bad schools. There is some kind of genetic determinism in this. HBD shows a consistency of personal success over many generations. Why? What are we supposed to do about what all the social engineering has failed? How is another group supposed to discriminate against part of a group (the problem) without the rest acting on ingroup loyalties? Stereotypes, again. Based on reality and human nature, which is timeless as it is irrational bullshit.
Look at what a person looks down on. They’re the opposite. They hate the poor? They’re rich. They hate the straight? They hate the successful? They hate the white? (Culturally, they’re probably not white).
Society’s standards are not a bad thing, either. That’s the secret to your progress – higher standards, not lowering the standard hoping that eventually, there’ll be no losers in a zero-sum game (who gets that house, promotion, partner, dollar). Meritocracy isn’t a promise of equality, it’s a promise of a chance at the hard work to become successful. You’re given a position in the race, not the medal. Some would fail even in a competition with themselves. I know the canned reply “You don’t know what you’re saying” typical gaslighting used to dismiss the range of points. “You mean my point, not your point.” Also gaslighting, red herring, derailing etc. We are not the same person and your views, moral outgroup, do not match mine. Having successful ancestors isn’t a crime, you should be shaming the people who have centuries of charity money chucked at them and still haven’t stopped raping little girls. In fact, those toxic memes are now spreading to the west with multiculturalism, which causes the low trust where nobody wants to help the outgroup anymore. It’s a feature, not a bug, a self-correction. Look at the consequences of a society that lived by their principles, it amazes me how many atheists want funerals. Why do dead bodies have rights in a secular society? Aren’t they just a clump of cells?
It’s easy to think we’re all equals when all your friends are the same. You don’t socialize with people who’d kill you for trying.
Dependents are not equals.