The Parenting Effect and Nurture Myth

quillette.com/2015/12/01/why-parenting-may-not-matter-and-why-most-social-science-research-is-probably-wrong/

Instead, genetics. This jives with other findings.

Personality? Genetic.

IQ? Genetic.

Political Party Identification? Genetic.

I sense a pattern here.

It's cute in a backward co-dependent way that you cannot distinguish self and subjective opinion

You know what is real?

Propaganda and peer influence. This includes teachers. Let that sink in.
Learning cultural lessons is important (how to speak, hold cutlery), but it won’t change who you are. You can undo false beliefs but not false behaviours, and the high criminal recidivism proves this. Rehab proves this. Our soft treatment of bad behaviour has produced – more bad behaviour. The brain is a learning machine but there is only one way it can unlearn a bad lesson – pain.
As we say, dating back centuries, Bad Blood Will Out. 

Want quantifiables? Your family affluence stabilizes over the generations.

White Governments want to parent new arrivals into acting like First World citizens. Magic Dirt is the 21st century Appeal to Magic Beans.

Avoid the Sociologist’s Fallacy, folks. You can’t replicate it because bullshit is unique.
Within a ‘narrow’ normal band of keeping the child physically/mentally healthy, and relatively happy, parenting doesn’t matter. He dirt child, you dirt parent. He Evil Jr., You Evil Sr.

The academic focus on parenting style was intended to damage the nuclear family via the Patriarch. It lectured like a Sunday Pastor about the evils of being authoritarian, and called it the Authoritarian Personality. You know, like not wanting your child to spend time around thugs or stay out late vulnerable to rape, which counts under the peer influence proven to be a decisive factor in their life. That was called terrible parenting because r-types don’t want the Ks to compete against their own rugrats by investing in their own future K-spawn? The sole response is to shame them for it.

Link: Natural law, natural consequences, natural punishment

Government is supporting stupidity. We are reaching the Idiocracy event horizon.

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the-principle-of-natural-consequences/17175

For breaking the natural law, there are natural penalties.  Those who live by knives die by them. Those who betray their friends lose them.  Those who abandon their children never know the sweetness of their kiss.  Those who travel from bed to bed lose the capacity for trust.  Those who torture their consciences are tortured by them in return.  Those who refuse the one in whose image they are made live as strangers to themselves.

This principle of natural consequences is woven into the fabric of our nature.  Not all our defiance can unravel a single stitch.  Some penalties show up within the lifetime of the individual; others may tarry until several generations have persisted in the same wrongdoing.  But the penalties are cumulative, and eventually they can no longer be ignored.

A good example of such further penalties can be found in the consequences of breaking the precept of chastity…

The Myth of ‘Hybrid Vigour’: Mixed Race/Beige People lies

This was intended to go in another drafted post but it ended up longer than the original draft topic. As a tangent this is worth detailed excavation. It operates on no logical, genetic, moral level.

Reminder: The most ‘mixed’ Europeans (with other Europeans) are pure as driven snow:
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/genetics-white-americans-are-very-white/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/genetic-study-white-americans-are-98-6-european/

The Beige People are promoted, and there is much mainstream media extolling of their imagined virtues, contrary to… evidence.

Wrong on so many levels. First of all, blondes would be dead as the dodo. Her eyes would be dark brown. Look up the female fertility rate by nation, she’d be practically entirely black. Read some Mendel for how that would work out.

There are people who salivate over this prospect: ” “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.” Sickeningly racist.
This also flies in the face of recent genetic evolution, that clearly shows a divergence: “Human races are evolving away from each other,” Harpending says. “Genes are evolving fast in Europe, Asia and Africa, but almost all of these are unique to their continent of origin. We are getting less alike, not merging into a single, mixed humanity.” Further, “We show that humans are changing relatively rapidly on a scale of centuries to millennia, and that these changes are different in different continental groups.”
The myth of so-called hybrid vigour flies in the face of the most probable causes of desirable characteristics such as intelligence, for example low genetic load. Exactly what it sounds like. If you divide rocks between barrels, you’re still carrying rocks, the same load of rocks and this is why the latest developments in healthcare are refining treatments based on the common ailments of the patient’s demographic (race). Paying attention to this stuff is literally saving lives. 

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)61886-3/abstract
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/38950/title/On-Race-and-Medicine/

Hybrid vigour has been given the PC name ‘heterosis’ but its origins lie in the racism of claiming slaves are hardier when bred like prize animals. It is quite literally Scientific Racism to claim we must breed out the evolved diversity of innate differences of humans as if we’re cattle. Most people have a confirmed tendency toward genophilia and prefer to date and reproduce within their own race, what if this majority refuse? As we all know from LGBT+ campaigning, who you are sexually attracted to (and not to) can never be a choice.
“We intend to create in Europe a mixed race of Asiatic and Negroid people” source

However, The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study found Whites scored the highest at IQ106 and the mixed race IQ99, slightly below average. At best, the studies in this area have shown the mixed child averages between their parents, much like the inherited finding for height. The ‘magic dirt’ hypothesis of immigration is groundless and fell prey to the Sociologist’s Fallacy: “The evolutionary theory does however predict that when different races occupy approximately similar environments, such as for instance in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands, the intelligence differences will remain. This prediction has been examined in twenty three societies worldwide in Lynn (2008) and has been confirmed in every case.” – Lynn in 2010.


This bodes well for a global high IQ future.
Which leads to a healthy, growing economy.
There is no other way to do this but encourage WEIRD IQ levels.
Which are inherited.

The Flynn Effect has tailed off since nutrition has been resolved for children, the factor is finished and the formula/data tinkered with to follow its projections for publication (sounds familiar) but in all likelihood it is a demonstration of measurement error writ large, as modern supposedly more intelligent people struggle even with the language of previous generations, let alone their testing standards. This should not be possible [black swan/negative evidence]
Mixed studies are rarely done and beg the question – a mix of whom? A mixed children of European races, further subdivided into Northern/South territories could present IQ gains as the nations are high IQ, high technology societies already. A parent from these combined with a parent from a low IQ undeveloped nation could not. Furthermore, it is remiss to ignore the validity of genetic ties to native homeland, bound up in human rights. Globally, White people are a strict minority and such experimentation would clearly violate the UN conditions for genocide. Moreover, the recessive genomic nature of White traits, compared to and unlike all other races, mark it as unsuitable for such experiments intending to knowingly dominate and replace such natives with outgroup gene sequences, and would make it a form of institutional ethnic cleansing. Legally, these recessive races should deserve protections from such interference in much the same way as we protect endangered species. Or is a bird’s life worth more than that of a human? Reservations now or reservations later.
Altogether, mixed race children have poorer environmental outcomes (such as higher homicide rates) and it would be unethical to encourage this. One-drop theory refers to the dominance of certain racial sequences down the centuries, where unexpected baby skin coloration might arise for example. Considering Dawkin’s work, we do not truly own our genes to make this irresponsible choice, our responsibility as a carrier for them as meme will be to pass on as many of them as purely as possible into the future and this cannot be done by becoming the Mendelian cuckoldry party. Forensic anthropology have proven racial taxonomy goes down to the bone, whatever you call it. Ignoring the differences won’t stop Asia from researching them, it’s coming out eventually. You can be there or you can be on the wrong side of history. We can view these differences under a microscope, they are not imaginary. We have a duty to protect this natural diversity of Homo Sapiens into the future. Every race has a right to exist, live in their homeland and self-determine.
Hybrid vigour is a dangerous myth. There are strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, within every single race and genetic diaspora. These are not a bad thing. They are natural. All of them. Evolution has formed them as adaptive. We cannot understand the full relevance of these varied profiles and we are ethically bound to leave them alone before meddling in the very blueprint of life.

Finally, we already know the genetic sweet spot for health when it comes to Inbreeding and Outbreeding. We would know this evolutionary boon by its natural super-fertility. 
It’s third-cousins that provide the perfect blend.

In a paper published today deCODE scientists establish a substantial and consistent positive correlation between the kinship of couples and the number of children and grandchildren they have. The study, which analyzes more than 200 years of deCODE’s comprehensive genalogical data on the population of Iceland, shows that couples related at the level of third cousins have the greatest number of offspring….

The findings hold for every 25-year interval studied, beginning with those born in the year 1800 up to the present day. Because of the strength and consistency of the association, even between couples with very subtle differences in kinship, the authors conclude that the effect very likely has a biological basis, one which has yet to be elucidated.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/dg-dlc020408.php
h/t: http://isteve.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/darwinian-sweet-spot-3rd-cousin.html

Unless you can come up with stronger findings (you can’t) –

Stop lying.

Born gay is stupid and dangerous, especially if you’re gay

http://aeon.co/magazine/society/why-born-gay-is-a-dangerous-idea/

It’s been obvious to me since the beginning. Never rest your laurels on a single hypothesis – nor legal matters either.
Think of it this way – would you bet all your Finals on your answer to a random, ultra-hard question?

secretly amused laughing lol rdj saints yeah fuck you

For societal deviance and destruction of the Old Order, would you bet your life on a piece of speculation?

joker DC smile smirk evil grin lol haha

Exactly, it’s suicidally stupid.

There is a funny HBD parallel to this in race, their “rationales” oppose one another;

Yet one stark difference between these civil rights movements has escaped notice.

African-American activists aggressively called out {?} arguments about genetic and biological differences as legacies of racist, Nazi science. By contrast, the marriage-equality movement has embraced biological determinism. Gay and lesbian activists have led the way popularising the idea that identity is biologically determined.

Now, if their side is totally and completely wrong about one thing e.g. Gay Germ Theory withstands, what are the odds they’re wrong about their other ‘sciences’? It amuses me, is all.
I mean;

 The battle for gay marriage has been won, and other, even more challenging battles lie before the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) movement. To succeed in them, activists and scholars must abandon the fundamental fiction they have propagated.

Can you blame me?

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

When politics and science mix, it’s hilarious.
They cannot win.
Even if there were biological predispositions, they’d be aborted out of the human genome. Either way – they’re fucked.

Nazi science was committed to uncovering the genetic differences associated with perversion, be that Jewishness, homosexuality, the Romani, people of colour, the mentally ill, or others deemed ‘born that way’.

All science looks to cause. ALL science. Like, that’s why we’re here.
We see a thing and we go – why did that happen? – about a billion times.

sherlock bbc cracking up lol laughing so hard

When we find differences between the forensic races, it’s called scientific racism by idiots. Nah, it’s forensics bruh.
Like, what will it be when we eventually find causative factors for gayness, whatever they may be? Scientific homophobia? That’s it – I’m using that phrase the next time some libtard says Born this Way.
These ridiculous SJW restraints on science won’t allow jack to get done. We’ll sit round twiddling our thumbs because drawing conclusions about people is bigoted stereotypy. Found a cure for cancer? Nah man, we don’t care, that’s albeist!

What is deeply ironic is that nowadays you could get the Jews to walk around with a Star of David on their clothing by choice if you made out it was the fashionable thing to do.

But both share the presupposition of biological determinism: that genetics determine identity; such genes must result in either elimination or embrace. This suggests why the activist alliance with genetic determinism yielded such successful results. [people respect science over rhetoric?]

Sweet while you’re in power (like now and Cathedral support for the useful idiots) or the explanations are nice and fluffy (e.g. pure genetics). What if they’re disgusting (i.e. pathogenic)? What happens when the Opposition take over, eventually? You only need to genocide a tribe ONCE. It’s like terrorism in that regard.

TLDR: LGBT, W/E+?

you're fucked lol tilda constantine gabriel

Chimp IQ determined by genes

Obvious study is obvious to smart people.

It has repercussions to people.

“A chimpanzee’s intelligence is largely determined by its genes, while environmental factors may be less important than scientists previously thought, according to a Georgia State University research study.

The study found that some, but not all, cognitive, or mental, abilities, in chimpanzees depend significantly on the genes they inherit. The findings are reported in the latest issue of Current Biology.

“Intelligence runs in families,” said Dr. William Hopkins, professor in the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience at Georgia State and research scientist in the Yerkes National Primate Research Center at Emory University. “The suggestion here is that genes play a really important role in their performance on tasks while non-genetic factors didn’t seem to explain a lot. So that’s new.”

The role of genes in human intelligence or IQ has been studied for years, but Hopkins’ study is among the first to address heritability in cognitive abilities in nonhuman primates. Studies have shown that human intelligence is inherited through genes, but social and environmental factors, such as formal education and socioeconomic status, also play a role and are somewhat confounded with genetic factors. Chimpanzees, which are highly intelligent and genetically similar to humans, do not have these additional socio-cultural influences.

“Chimps offer a really simple way of thinking about how genes might influence intelligence without, in essence, the baggage of these other mechanisms that are confounded with genes in research on human intelligence,” Hopkins said.

In the future, Hopkins wants to continue the study with an expanded sample size. He would also like to pursue studies to determine which genes are involved in intelligence and various cognitive abilities as well as how genes are linked to variation in the organization of the brain.

Hopkins also would like to determine which genes changed in human evolution that allowed humans to have such advanced intelligence.”

MacDonald review of Avdeyev’s Raciology book

https://www.vdare.com/articles/vladimir-avdeyev-and-the-russian-revival-of-racial-science

Subtitle: the science of hereditary traits and peoples.

It’s funny how the science is moving more toward nature over time, away from nurture.

“Under ecologically adverse circumstances like the Ice Ages, adaptations are directed more at coping with the adverse physical environment than at competing with other groups. In such an environment, there would be less pressure for selection for extended kinship networks and highly collectivist groups. Ethnocentrism would be of no importance at all in combating the physical environment.

Europeans are therefore less ethnocentric than other groups—which makes them susceptible to being subverted by groups with a strong sense of in-group solidarity. Individualist cultures show relatively little emotional attachment to in-groups. Personal goals are paramount, and socialization emphasizes the importance of self-reliance, independence, individual responsibility, and “finding yourself.””

explains a lot.