Only makes sense with r/K

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe

I wasn’t bristling at all. If it’s true, my incredulity wouldn’t matter whatsoever.

“I find that hard to believe” – faux skeptic incredulity, the worst kind.

Now do one line of posts that offends Democrats. IQ? Debt, GDP? RacexCrime?

I wish they did a series of studies measuring the blood pressure (stress) of different political factions when exposed to counterarguments. Who would be most triggered… and least?

We have something close, however. Long live Haidt!

ACHTUALLY, Conservatives understand the moral reasoning of the Left, but they don’t understands ours (they can’t explain it back).

Haidt: Conservatives Understand Liberals Better Than Liberals Understand Conservatives

When I speak to liberal audiences about the three “binding” foundations – Loyalty, Authority, Sanctity – I find that many in the audience don’t just fail to resonate; they actively reject these concerns as immoral. Loyalty to a group shrinks the moral circle; it is the basis of racism and exclusion, they say. Authority is oppression. Sanctity is religious mumbo-jumbo whose only function is to suppress female sexuality and justify homophobia.”

Bigots project.

Most amusing, they lie about the definition of bigot.

To prove my Kredentials:

Loyalty – the real Social Justice.  (Future)

Authority – competence and investment. (Present)

Sanctity – protection, preservation and value. (History)

The Left’s concerns are childish by comparison. Those values build societies. The Left cannot live in a civilization unless the hard work was done first by workers with those values. It does not belong to them to give away by their own admission (no loyalty, no ingroup preference, no ingroup, nothing owed/received). The modern Left is not the worker, it is the party of the petit bourgeois. That is why it dies. It died with the 20th century that tested it.

Left wing ideology has murdered hundreds of millions of people (Little Black Book of Communism). Social engineering was a tyrannical abuse of human rights e.g. the multicultural experiment. Slavery continues as trafficking and odious debt. Are most pedophiles left or right wing? Guess who’s on the “right side of history”?

We’re called right, we are right and in this century, we’ll be proven right.

If the Left won’t kill you in the womb, they’ll kill you with debt for their charity fun.

You’re free to celebrate your own genocide.

What does Marx have to do with China?

Thought experiment: What would Marx say?

Vague shitpost of the obvious incoming.


In an all-white society, he was right to fixate on class because race wasn’t a factor.
Still, race has become too burdensome as a factor, people forget class. The Left aren’t wrong to bring it up, merely to blame it for everything. Class isn’t even blank slate, that’s just the way economists lie about it to deny historic responsibility from their field. Bubbles aren’t natural, unless you mean the soap kind. They are man-made – by crooks.
Marx was right that the middle class have to die. What he missed is that middle-class ideas have to die. That would swiftly solve the problem of the chattering class.
There’s no middle-class without a separate identity to carve, an axe to grind, an other to oppress or uplift, in an appeasement display to prevent their own demise or consolidate their position against same-race competition.
The superpower is in the production. During the British Empire, the factories were here, since the Industrial Revolution. Then America, and they had two profitable wars for the right people. Now, China runs the world. The Chinese aren’t being told to learn English, the West is being told to learn Mandarin. The Chinese have enslaved their own people to spread by immigration, to reach by financial influence and to conquer the West in the long-run. Outbreeding us also outweighs in terms of war. They can afford to lose a billion, we can’t lose a fifth of that without going extinct. The West ought to await Malthus with glee.
Mother Russia will always come up smelling of roses, you never mess with Mother Russia. The Chinese under-estimate the Russian, they don’t understand the psychology. It’s passive, it isn’t aggressive, and it settles very well.
Where are the factories? Where are the workers? Where are the means of production? You might say, They never won a war! But they won. They won something and something real. Further, the US never beat the British, not in real terms. Always one step forward, three back.
The USA has never won a war. Look how independence is going. Do you really think the mass immigration from Africa would’ve happened back then under British rule? Neither of those world wars were necessary.
China won the spoils of all that bloodshed with patience and cheap toys. I think it might be Christmas that killed the Christian. Perhaps the Puritans were right.
However, the consent of the Western worker is a fickle thing. The parasite load of the global economy is reaching tipping point thanks to demographic shifts. Really, it’s a tidal wave and you need to keep a weather eye on the horizon to know when to move. The gene pool is full of mud and antibiotic resistant disease.
Nations have been sold out for less short-term gain.
The financial systems rely on worker consent. Marx correctly pointed out that when they realize the game is up, there are no more gibs and no retirement…. what else is left but rebellion? Slaves rebel.
Statist reward incentives are parasitic on the very people who produce them. I won’t sit here grinding on an old wheel. Gen Y and Z will be fascinating to watch as this plays out. Brainwashed from nursery.
I wanted to point out these basic, salient arrangements.
It’s everybody’s problem.
This isn’t a white issue, but whites do appear to be the golden goose – at least in terms of charity ‘aid’.
I’ve said before, you can’t have white levels of prosperity with fewer white people in society.
Resources are contracting because population is expanding past the elastic.
It’s going to snap.
The sustainable nutjobs lose traction because they never discuss the eugenic need for population control. They do on any other species. By comparison, the UN pretends this will happen magically. Humans are a locust swarm on this planet, but not all humans. #NotAllHumans
The common sense necessity to acknowledge this is missing thanks to vice and corruption, the outcome. The academics expect gold-plated pensions. The politicians want to be voted back in. The economists want grants. The capitalists want fatter margins. The same finite resources divided between a sustainable, reduced population (commonly est. 1 billion, possibly up to 2) will result in instant prosperity. Marx believed that reducing the working-class was impossible, since the rich would suffer but- what if the poor don’t work? Marx is ridiculous for many reasons, but not so much as his followers who believe nothing has changed in almost a century and a half. When practically everything has changed and they also brag about this ‘progress’… cognitive dissonance is a brain cancer, kids.
For the poor to be better off, most of the population has to go. The majority isn’t Rich.
Squeezing the rich would only work a few years… they’d stop producing.
Demographics. Economics is an application, either correct or incorrect. Beyond demographics, there isn’t much to say. Economists are not social scientists*. They don’t care about people. They will screw people to get numbers. Economists would be run out of any medieval town, a saner time. They usually sell Get Rich(er) Quick – this is afforded by a broken currency system and fractional reserve leprechaun money.


There isn’t One solution. There are many. Like a jigsaw. Many problems.
Maybe something like 75% have a similar cause, but they don’t all have the same solution.
People don’t want to look because not only does it 1. suck to live through something you don’t deserve, but 2. the Problem is huge and 3. there are too many details to discuss solutions at this stage of decline. Where’s the will?

*Could we also stop asking engineers and physicists about social science problems? Their opinions are crap. Ask a 5yo.

Also, social scientists are not preachers. Their word isn’t gospel. Neither is a preachers, come to think.

What does Bill Nye, a children’s show presenter, know about how to bring down national debt?
What does Token Black Tyson know about humanities education?
What does ..actually, there aren’t any celebrity female scientists, are there?

We need SOLUTIONS.

A ‘final solution’ won’t fix the social system or the hegemonic cultural paradigm. Yes, you’re very edgy, please move and let the grown-ups talk.

Look at the food security of Asia if you want a blackpill LOL, especially the much-vaunted SE and China (our economic superior). It hasn’t occurred to a lot of  these ‘redpills’ that Asia has only been historically strong because the West is all-time weak. Superpowers are on a see-saw kind of setup.

I think Africa will invade Asia, personally, based on land bridges and farmland.

Aid workers are not saints, they are the devil in a halo.
History will view them as scum, vermin, who encouraged Mass rape, disease and famine.
All for the glory of their pride.

They knew this was coming. They simply don’t care. Look up the disaster of Millennium villages. They wanted their bribe money, free 4x4s, 5* hotels and plenty of brown children to rape.

Google ‘UN rape scandal’ sometime.

Video: Conservatism is the new counter-culture

I wish he’d said Cultural Marxism, name the beast and like a demon, you have control of it.
And it’s status signalling, that’s the research term. Virtue signalling was a journalist invention.
Nor does he mention it’s a means for middle class people to judge working class people without looking like raging bigots (because people with a real job don’t give a shit what the Guardian thinks). The culture war is a class war designed to change the poor via pop culture.

They keep losing arguments.

It doesn’t sink in.

They keep losing elections.

It doesn’t sink in.

I think the anti-speech laws were a turning point here (UK).
The classical liberals realized they were on the side of the censors.

Two key articles on this topic if you haven’t seen:

New Church Ladies

http://thoughtcatalog.com/jim-goad/2014/04/the-new-church-ladies/

Stepford Students

http://new.spectator.co.uk/2014/11/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/

Adults are putting their foot down to entitled little shits and saying you have no high horse. We reject Standpoint Theory. We have the right to laugh at your student opinions. You can’t control us.

r/K mindsets in psychology – liberals more WEIRD than conservatives

http://righteousmind.com/liberals-are-weirder-than-conservatives/

Naturally they’re cliche, they must be mainstream and inoffensive or they get kicked out.

Five years and thousands of participants later, we just published the findings in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

We found that American liberals think even WEIRDer, even more unlike the rest of the world, than the average American conservative.

Yes, neolibs are in fact, the closed-minded, stupid bigots.

evil smirk cheeky cavill

It’s a cult.

True sarcastic comment from an r-type;

Haidt uses the second half of The Righteous Mind to explicate a bloated theory that liberals concern themselves with only two of these moral foundations, care and fairness, whereas conservatives are concerned with all five. Haidt sees this so-called difference in moral emphasis as the reason conservative arguments resonate so emotionally with the electorate.

The data showed that, yes. That’s why he said it. When you have enough data to write a book I’ll give a damn what you think.

“When subversion reaches the lowest point, releasing, quite literary, hell on earth, things immediately have nowhere else to go but upwards. Once the lie is absolutely realized, the ground falls out from under it – it can exist only as a parasite on the body of truth.” ~ Branko Malic for René Guénon

h/t Citadel Foundations.

“Clever Sillies” (stupid liberals and IQ)

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/if-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives-why-are

Bruce G. Charlton, Professor of Theoretical Medicine at the University of Buckingham and Editor in Chief of Medical Hypotheses, may have an explanation.  In his editorial (link is external) in the December 2009 issue of Medical Hypotheses, Charlton suggests that liberals and other intelligent people may be “clever sillies,” who incorrectly apply abstract logical reasoning to social and interpersonal domains….

It’s nice to see his work mentioned mainstream.
I keep thinking he’s one of ours as if he isn’t known.

Social metaphor: Liberals see everything NOT/Them, logically (¬liberal) as a nail and their solution is the hammer. Hammer for more public money, for more tax, for banning things and bleeding hearts. It’s like they’re all tuned into the same radio. It’s a form of maladaptive problem solving pertaining to confirmation bias and circular reasoning.

bored have you heard enough listening tired no please stop go Lestat IWTV

I happen to know sampling bias and self-report bias are also HUGE issues on these matters (the N of self-identifying liberals far exceeds conservatives), rarely corrected for because they need that sweet p-value.