Roosh on the Alt Right in his own words

Based largely on: http://www.returnofkings.com/79234/the-alt-right-is-worse-than-feminism-in-attempting-to-control-male-sexual-behavior

First, the charge that he’s trying to ingroup (and profiteer) he doesn’t deny.

I’ve gotten messages from hundreds of self-proclaimed members of the alt right who say I can’t be “in” their movement, even though I have never contributed for an alt right site or spoken at one of their functions.

That isn’t how membership works, it’s ideological affirmation and using the term like one of the ingroup. Standing beside us, as it were.

The alt right has gone from a possible political alternative to a frustrated mob that wants to control the sexual choices of all men. With whom have we encountered that before?

Feminism.

He’s trying to pull a false equivalence between the Patriarchs and the Anti-Patriarchs. Logic is not his forte or he’s lying.

Feminism is a movement that aims to maximize female sexual choices while minimizing male sexual choice.

Let’s try this to see how the logic fits:
Neo-masculinity is a movement that aims to maximize male sexual choices while minimizing female sexual choice.
Behold, it fits like a glove!

The alt right started as a nationalist movement, and that’s what many people believe it to currently be, but we’re only three months away from it being a movement primarily concerned with minimizing the sexual choices of everyone. While feminists want to control how a man has sex, the alt right wants to control who they have sex with.

Standards apply to everyone. And he isn’t much about ‘sexual choice’ since consent is a meager theory and frankly, a joke to him, what with the fucking unconscious women (cannot consent), ‘diddling’ despite explicit verbal instructions not to and the Rapist’s New Clothing line of LMR.

rooshaltrightgaslightattempt

Conflating the Cultural Marxists (SJWs) with people who are anti-CM (inc. the AR)…

He’s actually trying to gaslight men now, like that’s gonna work? Passing off women as overly-emotional (hysterical), perhaps it might work, but men? It’s almost like he doesn’t know what empathy level is normal for humans (more than zero). The big three crimes tend to elicit maximal disgust as social norm and gender role violations. Rape, for example, is classically worse a crime in men because of their role/duty as protector of women. Is the use of ‘mob’ grandiose or prognostic?

rooshcuckingARnope

The cuck attempt failed, simple as. European Whites won’t be lectured by non-white degenerate, simple equation.He couldn’t slip into our ranks and this is his narcissistic rage coming out. Meanwhile his defenders can only play Battered Wife and defend him whatever happens, and say he’s Only Joking. He is attracted to white women but repulsed by white men, obviously the latter were gonna notice and figure, hey, he’s the enemy.

leaverooshalone

Back to the article, it makes you wonder why he lives in Europe if we’re so damn awful.

If the bulk of alt right practitioners have their way, white men will not be allowed to date non-white women and non-white men will not be allowed to date white women or even flirt with them. They will proudly boast of these sexual rules, not knowing that they morphed into a white pride version of the incel forum PUA Hate.

Wow such outgrouping. I guess since we’re like SJWs he won’t want our evil whitey protection if they come after him again? He’s on our land. Will he hide behind another (white) bodyguard in bravery? I pray he remains in Europe, he’s a form of entertainment that can only end in disaster.

I think of this whenever I see a mob baying for blood online

Someone who repeatedly calls for the rapacious sexual appetites of sex-positive feminism to be crushed by shaming has the gall to say this. Men must establish a moral standard for women to follow it, he thinks the sexes are atomized and there’s no (antisocial) ripple effect. Maybe in America, too degenerate to notice.

Once their sexual control objectives are reached, the alt righters will then move to controlling your friendly and casual relationships.

Oh, conspiracies. Being on friendly trade terms is hardly equitable to swapping DNA, is it? Having children, or, as he agrees, merely sleeping with them, since he believes in telegony. Note in the whole world full of women, he demands access to the white ones? He is almost having an infantile reaction to it, a tantrum. R-types don’t like being cut off. Why can’t he target the majority of (non-white) women instead? There’s a whole world beyond Europe. No, he wants the already a minority of White women for himself. He targets us specifically, a sexual racial discrimination (different from natural genophilic preference in that they discriminate against their ingroup).
Reminder, he said this.

rooshvdefaultopinionwhoremisogyny

The words of a traditionalist?

Miscegenation law (what he tries to disparage as mere ‘rules’) has a much longer history than the state of affairs now, and data such as the FBI rape rates (where the race realism kicks in) and records of domestic abuse showed a clear mixed-race relationship pattern of social danger. Law protects the meek and constrains the violent, that’s why he doesn’t use the term. The law doesn’t let you make stupid ‘choices’ like drunk-driving either.

If you don’t want to take my word for it, ask them these two questions yourself:

1. In your ideal nation, will white men be able to consensually sleep with non-white women?
2. In your ideal nation, will non-white men be able to consensually sleep with white women?

One. They don’t want to date other races if a white woman is available, look around at the data. Heartiste acknowledges mixing is for the desperate and low SES.
Two. The white women will be available to become wives/mothers if you a) quit brainwashing them with the We’re All Equal BS and b) prize the Cologne invader rapists off first, that is the meaning of Remove Kebab, mass immigration of hostile marauders is a genocidal selective pressure, by the very definition, it oppresses the native white peoples.

In a beautiful example of the obnoxious tone-deaf;

It’s clear to me that when PUA Hate shut down after Elliot Rodger’s mass murder spree, its thousands of members floated in the ether until finding a movement that would have them. That movement is the alt right.

When the SJWs come for him, nobody help.
Maybe they can bring out a new line of propaganda on the occasion.

SJWs mobs

Also, Elliot Rodger was mixed race, part of the reason for his cray-cray. He hated the fact he wasn’t white. He felt entitled to white women and this sounds familiar.

I must certainly be a rapist because of distorted out-of-context travel writing, an accusation which I unequivocally deny.

You wrote it, what a dumb motherfucker.
It wasn’t misquoted, we heard the full passage.

Only to a feminist—and now to an alt righter—is sleeping with a woman who consumed alcohol and consented to sex considered rape.

He doesn’t understand consent law, why am I not surprised? And consent isn’t a sexual term either, it’s about any social exchange and a prime feature of contract law. Can you sign a legally binding document while drunk or is it contested? What dumb motherfuckers, or are they lying and think we’re that dumb to fall for it?

The terms vitiate consent and obviate consent spring to mind, I feel like he might hear them from a European judge one day (certainly America won’t want him back). I keep saying, PUAs need to look up local laws.

It turns out that homosexuals have some sort of perverse immunity in the alt right.

I’ve never heard of a gay bloke who targeted white women and raped them (alleged yeah whatever). He seems to take the solipsism route and assume this is about him as a person instead of his behaviour (what others judge without prejudice and how laws are written).

Brace yourself, another conspiracy.

From the rumors I’ve been hearing, a number of influential alt right members are indeed homosexual. They’ll go on and on about the Jewish question—and attack you if you don’t—but ignore discussion of the “homosexual question” and its role in wrecking societies. Now you know why.

That’s like saying Roosh likes wearing women’s underwear. Nobody is going to believe it, are they? I mean… that’s ridiculous, right?

Olivia-Wilde_naughty

The general AR opinion is that you can’t make them un-gay (inc. Germ Theory) so what’s the point of hating them? They can’t be part of the nuclear family but they can’t destroy it either, unlike Kebab.

The alt right is not serving the needs of men who don’t want their behavior controlled

They can go elsewhere. They’re free to leave. PLEASE DO. Go to your beloved Thai brides and ruin your own genetic line, if you want. That’s the point, free up space and resources here. They (people who won’t follow the ‘rules’, social norms etc.) just can’t immigrate here. No matter the visa source. Isn’t “the dystopian [sexual] standard of the left” promiscuity? Leading to… The inability to pair bond for a nuclear family?

Bear in mind, for all his racist! pointing, shrieking and posturing, he doesn’t want to mix with anything less than White women himself.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/01/link-rooshs-7-demands-for-a-future-wife/
4. No blacks, Asians or Indians

Acceptable races are South American, Persian, Armenian, and European (non-Northern).” Wtf is it with PUAs and White Fever?

For that reason, I can no longer support the alt right, since they’re now mostly under the control of the mob.

But he said (up top), he inferred he was never In the Alt Right to begin with? Which is it, bitch?

He thinks the AR will

pull the switcheroo and grossly limit their behavior in a way that is worse than feminism

To a r-type, nothing is worse than telling them they can’t have their favourite toy. It’s the end of the world if you tell them the common sense truth: not all sex is good. They pitch a bitch fit at this. The STDs, social damage, single parents, abortions, addiction, rape/other crime, they will admit to these things but conspicuously fail to draw the obvious conclusion that the only thing distinguishing human society from our animal history is the limitation of sexuality. ALL sexual behaviour. A Patriarchy is the classic model of this, as adulterers for example, were stoned to death. Those charged with seduction were often hanged, sometimes castrated. No word on his opinion of real Patriarchy, run by fathers for the protection of families. 

He links to a video where he is quoted saying this and doesn’t deny it.

“I’m not white. Why should I care about the future of white societies?”

Remember that sentiment. Treasure it when he pops up on the news one day, savaged by SJWs. Well, his body maybe. Yet in spite of this apparent danger from Evil White Men and racist Europe, he wants to be here. He wants to be here, so don’t feel guilty when he gets to stay here a little longer than he planned.

He keeps trying to make a big deal out of all this. The whole world is against him now! Europe = whole world. International – yet he refuses to leave the places that are apparently hostile to him. Places he requires a visa to visit. Rabbits lack common sense. If you cry wolf long enough one might eat you.

He goes on to try the Divide and Conquer again, to outgroup K-types against themselves.

The story of what happened to the alt right is the story of every single internet movement in existence: subversion.

Let me guess, he knows everything, right?
About a group he claims he never joined?

If an internet movement is decentralized and based on open admission [DS: yet rejected you?] from outsiders who can steer its direction, particularly women [one half of a traditional society] and homosexuals [only hurting themselves], it will fail [the SJWs seem to be fine]. That doesn’t mean it won’t have an effect upon society, but it will fall very rapidly after its peak. [decades and counting] The alt right likely peaked with introducing the term cuckservative in terms of mainstream influence.

We all know that’s a lie. He idealized us and now, like a narcissist, he devalues us. Yawn.

He’s trying to cuck us and say “Let’s you and them fight.” We haven’t fallen for it. He’s an adult in his late 30s. That’s just sad. His definition of violence against himself btw, is the laughable time a feminist threw a drink on him. He called that ‘violence’. I don’t mean the glass, I mean poured the drink within onto him. That’s how rabbity this degenerate is.
I mean, he gets his totally objective boyfriend to attention-whore and bellyache about What a Nice Guy He Is, Really. That’s one pozzed dildo, to reference the most topical meme.

Another sign that the movement will stay limited is that it’s not getting more than indirect recognition from Donald Trump or his allies beyond a tweet or two even though they are his most rabid supporters.

Roosh is meanwhile still to influence anyone and crawls for Trump’s recognition like a mewling dog.
He really wants us to stop trying, huh? Then why try to ape us with his laughable neo-masculinity? Nobody owns such concepts, least of all a non-white degenerate.

Donald Trump is already considered “extreme” with his brand of nationalism,

by SJWs, nobody sane

so you would think that he would wholeheartedly reach out to the alt right and invite its leaders to speak at his rallies,

or reach out in secret and fish for ideas like a real politician

or at least thank them for their promotion of his candidacy,

no

but he’s doing nothing of the sort because the obsession with Jews, cuckholds, Nazi imagery, and rigid sexual controls for all men make them indigestible to over 99% of the population, even among traditional white Christians.

He thinks he knows how White Christians think.

For that reason, we may have to change their name to Alt Blight.

Is that a joke? Is that the best he can do?

I hate to point fingers, but some alt right leaders have caused the subversion of their own movement

No, he literally just tried to cuck (‘switcheroo’ himself in the place of authority of) the leaders of the Alt Right for ruining the Alt Right. You didn’t imagine. Meanwhile, he and his friends destroyed PUA and the manosphere, refuse to fix it. Or at least were all suspiciously present at the approximate time the ship sank…

by not staying on top of its direction and by succumbing or remaining silent to demands of the mob even though it conflicted with their own personal beliefs. They believed that their little meme-making Frankensteins would lead them to glory, but instead it will lead them to defeat. I can assure you that my movement, neomasculinity, will never sacrifice its ideals for a moment in the spotlight like the alt right leaders have done.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/who-is-roosh-v/

He has a serious Savior Complex. Photographic evidence included.

rooshjesusbibleirony

In fact, I’m making moves right now which remove us from the spotlight so we don’t unnecessarily expose ourselves to attacks by mobs.

Let’s get influence by hiding! – cults and cowards.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/02/21/return-of-cucks-burrowing/
How long until a Fed tape surfaces to an SJW outlet, triggering an indictment, are we betting fellows? Who takes a losing bet. Imagine how illegal the things he wants to say (too much for his current blogs) must be if the First Amendment won’t protect him in public? All the Feds need is one witness for sedition. #supersaiyan

If he tries to hold these things abroad, where he is under different jurisdiction and laws, I don’t think even Allah could help him on that one. I do not envy the man who crosses Interpol, which has a rather large kebab skewer they are presently, angrily, in the process of removing.

He seems to confuse, in a delusion, All Men with just him. One male. He will be historically irrelevant and almost certainly childless, this too shall pass and with it self-importance (this mentality among of Stand For X as signs of a personality cult).
One does not equal all, as I told Aurini: “I haven’t insulted all men I insulted one male, based on a plethora of evidence from the horse’s own mouth, quit being a bitch about it when you know full well the difference of one vs all.” He isn’t even a man, he is a teenager in an adult’s body. Transagist, almost.

The alt right has a detailed 100-point plan for controlling your sex life and your friendships, solely based on your skin pigment, but much less on a nation’s political system, economic structure, relationship with religion, or even the most basic of social and reproductive policies.

No moral authority whatsoever. They know the words and not the music.

As for controlling people based on their ‘skin pigment’, Roosh has certainly lightened up over the years, along with his magically shrinking nose, he looks to be pulling a Michael Jackson. I don’t recall the part of the Bible where it said to not only allow invaders (especially of other religions) but also allow them to defile the local womenfolk.

In fact, the Bible I read say to only help foreigners so they might leave your company faster and never return. Unmentioned goes the punishment the robbers would face too. Elsewhere, the fornicators are forgiven on one basis – go forth and sin no more. Which religion is he reading? SJWs abusing the Bible for rhetoric don’t count as Christians. “The LORD also will be a stronghold for the oppressed, A stronghold in times of trouble;” Who is the oppressed in Europe?

Back to the Alt Right

“Sexual frustration, resentment, low self-esteem, and jealousy are terrible problems to have”

as I’ve said “Oh, the classic refrain “They hate me, they must be jealous!” No. That’s literally never true. It’s a non-seq.” Let’s see how this neatly slots into projection.

  • Nobody is as sexually frustrated as Roosh, who can’t secure a White wife.
  • Nobody is as resentful as Roosh, who lives among us in Europe and can never be one of us.
  • Nobody has such low-esteem as Roosh, because obviously. He writes books about how great he is. Come on.
  • Nobody is as jealous as Roosh, who wants to prevent white women sexually selecting white men (as is their data-demonstrated natural preference) and vice versa (he’s telling white men to look anywhere but the West, while living here himself) and he will say anything to deter the white men from correcting the years of brainwashing that There’s No Such Thing As Race or he’ll be deported.

How’s that for media bias? He speciously concludes.

“I still believe that a form of nationalism is needed to defeat the liberal establishment that is run by sociopathic globalists

Nationalism is racial, dumbass. Do you even population genetics?

Encourage the stupid it will make less of them

Wouldn’t it be funny if Trump turned on the likes of him once in power?
I mean, brings in new rape law to get a certain Clinton, for example?
It could happen.

Quit feeding this troll, good people of the AR, he’s a chauvinistic pig who enjoys rolling in his own shit. His traffic was down before he baited you there and he profits from traffic.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:A78jNBx23oEJ:micro.rooshv.com/2016/02/the-alt-right-is-more-sensitive-than-sjws/+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

“How to get a lot of hits to your web site: criticize the alt right.”

Much better for people who dislike to gather reward money for any woman to come forward and give a legally binding account of his not-rape techniques in action.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QOPYvJP5ILcJ:micro.rooshv.com/2016/02/the-alt-right-was-all-fun-and-laughs/+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

One comment was amusing, total lack of self-awareness typical of narcissists.

“They’re all institutions and ideologies that weak men use to mask their failures.”

what wut wtf shock surprise slow turn eh littlefinger pause got

That’s all, folks. He’s so successfully outgrouped himself with this ovenworthy trash from anyone that might have protected him from being strung up on a lamp post one day that Machiavelli himself would almost be impressed by such an overt death wish and lack of social nuance. He’s thrown the insult book at us and (gasp!) told people to ignore us, because we’re mean to him what an obnoxious child. I bet he masturbates to his own traffic stats.

Our conscience is clear for the time this particular ‘Kebab’ is removed, he seems to like being called that, luxuriates in crass obscenity. Let him whine like a bitch and play Victim and sooner or later it’ll be true and nobody will come.
All this talk over one bitch dragging it out for PR, if he weren’t forcing himself on white women in their homeland, nobody would’ve cared to start with.

Roosh’s press conference, a breakdown

This will be brief but I wanted to highlight how ridiculous this is.
He thinks this makes him look good when he’s actually taking a dive like Anita Sarkeesian, he’s literally playing Victim Pro.

cool mocking shades yes peace

About as smooth as gravel.

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/transcript-rooshv-press-conference-6216.html

Bear in mind the AS comparison, I’ll come back to it. Rebel outsider or precious victim, you can’t be both.
Bearing in mind, he said this before, to repeat myself;

https://archive.is/oh4Zo

I can’t say I’m angry at their coverage. The reason is that there is nothing the media can do anymore to hurt me, and even if they paint me as a baby murderer, I will still gain readers because of it. When you are in an anti-fragile position, you’re immune to all manner of attacks, and so it’s the coverage alone that helps me because it gets my ideas across to those who have yet to see it.”

Ready? Here we go.
(Also if someone wants to shop his face on that chicken, please be my guest).

Roosh: All right, are you ready? Is that a yes? Oh, we have a new one. Where do you work from?

Female Reporter: Um, Martha Stewart?

Roosh: Martha Stewart?

Female Reporter: Yes.

(Laughter)

Roosh: Okay, yeah, sure. I don’t know how she got in here. Someone must have told her. All right, so first I’m going to make a statement and then you can ask me anything. Cool?

Insulting a woman for doing her job for yet another woman is an excellent way to prove you aren’t a misogynist, what a way to begin. Someone give him a speech course for the Muslim equivalent of Christmas, please.

All right, so the world has gone insane in the past week.

Gaslighting the world press. I don’t think that’s gonna work.
But yes I’m sure the whole world is at fault, not you. #whatnarcissism

Why? Number one, I had organized meet ups around the world for men to enjoy a social happy hour to meet in private and talk about anything. Work, politics, girls, just to meet.

Just to meet. Is that why all the security? Code names, really?
When you say politics, is that a yes or no to foreign sedition?
When you say girls, (and not women,) do that include tuition on how to get them into bed when otherwise they might not?

Okay? Number two, a year ago I wrote an article How to Stop Rape. This article, to a 10-year-old, was obvious that I didn’t intend to legalize rape or cause harm against women.

He sounds like he’s implying his average reader has the IQ of a 10yo. It wasn’t even his worst article, I’ve covered his degeneracy, completely serious and claiming to be truthful, and I believe the Daily Mail used that post to cherry-pick a quote, I recognized my own work.
There’s a new concept called Schrodinger’s Douchebag, they’ll say something raw and depending on the reaction, will reveal whether they were serious (and edgy) or ‘only joking’ and blame you for what they said. As in, how could you think I meant the thing I composed in my head? I don’t think that’s gonna work on… what? Millions of people? A billion? Blame-shifting only works on the type of immature girl he prizes himself on targeting.

But starting on Sunday, a lot of you have lied by saying that I am a pro-rape advocate.

That was literally the point of the article. Thought experiment or no.
You did write IN advocacy of it. And specifically rape of women, which you never philosophically justified. Philosophers still advocate their positions, even when mocking them. Read a book?
I want to pull a Diogenes and hold aloft a chicken *cough* while proclaiming;
“Behold! I’ve brought you a man.” *Roosh softly cucking*

He wants women to get hurt!

You said it would teach them a lesson. How can that possibly be misinterpreted?
He’s gonna turn into a slang term at this rate, it’ll go from douche to Roosh the Douche and eventually just Roosh.

If you think I’m being harsh, he actually said: “Bad encounters are sure to occur, but these can be learning experiences for the poorly trained woman

Is this how feminists feel all the time? Victim blaming, minimizing, speaking of women like dogs, no blame on the criminal while he’s claiming victim in his own speech.

and  “The exception for public rape is aimed at those seedy and deranged men who randomly select their rape victims on alleys and jogging trails”
…unlike those seedy enough to use pick-up? getting them too drunk to consent? drugs not out of the question?

And then the third thing, you said the meet ups are about rapists. They want to gather to learn how to rape. They are going to exchange tips. Some of you have called it a rape rally! What the hell is that? A rape rally? So because of that I’ve been all over the world in terms of the news. Over 100 articles have been written.

This is especially interesting because he didn’t actually deny it. He’s catastrophized it (for questioning his *snort* moral fibre) but he didn’t say, ‘no, I’m not going to teach them how to take sex from unwilling women.’

He needs to be very careful about this because if he keeps implying legal action and talking big, a lawsuit might be started by a larger party to get in first, setting events off, and everything about him will come out. Possibly some past rape accusations such as when he lies about his name, as he admits to doing. Pick-up might even be outlawed from a case that large, defined as hate speech as I already explained the legal precedent in seduction law and fraud.

The result is what? I’m currently the most hated man in the world.

Please.

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

You’re like those celebrities who complain when cameras follow them.
You choose the work, you choose the attention. You don’t get to pick only the positive attention, big baby. And he slags off women for being whiny victims, can we say Projection?

Governments from all over the world have talked about me. Australia has tried to keep me out.

It’s their country, entitled prick. You were saying all about the perils of immigration in other articles.

They called up their Navy to keep me out because they thought that I was going to get in through a private yacht.

Cos you said you’d go by boat, sneaky little liar. He misses out, ‘forgets’ anything that makes him look culpable.

So the Navy got called up. In England, the House of Commons debated me for half an hour to say how I’m a bad man who shouldn’t be allowed entry.

Yes, I know, I’ve been there.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Where do you think they got that idea? You said you hated London, you told men never to go there (we need our tourist money), after all, why should we let you back? Nobody owes you a visa. Then you go on to slag off Glasgow for having Scottish soul. Roosh makes friends wherever he goes, how he does it, nobody knows….

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/daryush-valizadeh-watch-uk-parliament-debate-banning-repulsive-us-pickup-artist-1541972
“If criminal offences have been committed – including incitement of violence against women – then the government would expect local police forces to deal with any offenders appropriately.” That’s your formal warning, FYI.
Also, the sarcastic tone to naming “Return of Kings” is because they’re slagging off a real-life monarchy. In case you didn’t catch that. You bitches write about it, we live it. GSTQ.
Are you oppressed or not? If so, you can’t be surprised the Man (the local law you PUAs keep ignoring) is keeping you down. If not, you’re a liar.

Mayors from everywhere, Canada, have said were going to keep him out (like they could anyway they are just a mayor, a mayor can’t keep someone out). The governor of Texas said the same thing. Police from everywhere said that all meetups will be monitored.

Public meetups. If you meet up IN PUBLIC, it’s a public meetup. That’s what words mean.

A private meetup for men is going to be monitored. 1984 is here.

It isn’t private. Anyone could show up. It isn’t on private property, at best rented. Land laws aren’t the same, it’s a semi-public space, so banning anyone on demo grounds is illegal. As he admitted, there is a political motive I’m sure intelligence services will be looking into, and those need to be filed and registered with the proper authorities, ahead of time. Even SJWs have to do this. You can’t go to a foreign land and expect their laws won’t apply to you…. unless you’re a Roosh.

Worst of all, my family’s address was put on the Internet through the hacking group Anonymous

Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

ah, that name again…

comes up a lot doesn’t it?

and your colleagues at the Daily Mail confirmed the doxx and say that I my mom’s meatloaf everyday.

DM is a gossip rag, as the writers will freely admit down the pub. They like ‘spoons. Nobody takes it seriously. They post on the Queen, cancer and various outrage porn. Most of the writers are preening middle-class toffs, like the Sun, which is toffs being ironic. The Guardian is toffs being hilariously serious.

Dozens of threats have come in.

Ooh, dozens. Is that more or less than AS? ZQ? Is this a competition now?
He said multiple times we shouldn’t take online bullying seriously, that the threats weren’t real so these SJWs should get over it.

Someone said that they’re going to burn my house down but save my mom. So I’m glad, but you have to understand that your work and the work of your own colleagues have incited a mob based on lies that has put my family in danger. If they get hurt right now, God forbid, it’s because of you. It’s because you didn’t read a damn article, you misinterpreted, and now we have this rage mob to where, as you can see, I had to hide this. I told you don’t tell anyone.

He’s a thirty-something year old MAN and he’s still pointing the finger and blaming other people for his fuck-ups?
Notice he doesn’t blame the victim when it might be him?

I must state right now that not a single woman has been hurt by me.

He didn’t use the r-word… odd diversion…
And the oven-worthy post proves that emphatically false.

I’ve never been accused of rape.

Give it time.

I’ve never been charged.

That’s… not the same thing…..

No follower of mine has read something by me and then gone to rape because I know if they did hurt a woman it would be all over the news. Not a single woman has been hurt.

Big talk.

Yet, there is a real rape mob somewhere and there is media from the country where that mob is. Who wants to volunteer what country has an active rape mob? What happened on New Year’s Eve in Cologne?

Typical rabbit.
You’re ganging up on me, you should feelbad! Don’t look at me, look at that guy! That other guy! Let’s you and him fight! [Roosh is a woman confirmed]
Ignore the Muslim predator writing books encouraging brown men to take Europe, country by country, calling all white women whores for these other Muslims in Europe, going country to country, calling white women whores! That makes me doing it O.K.! Right?

also, “active rape mob” – subconsciously, he’s thinking he runs the passive rape mob, who could be that overt about it but prefer trickery, and that makes it morally acceptable

Does anyone know? Someone? On New Year’s Eve mobs of men assaulted women, they raped them, and what did you guys do? You covered it up.

that was just the German Government, wrong audience, get a lesson pls

So when a real rape happens that goes against the agenda of your boss, you actually hide it. But then when no rapes happen and I try to do a meetup you lose your shit.

Nothing happened because you cancelled it, can, can he hear himself?

So I just wanted to come here just to state that not only are you guys not honest in your reporting of me but that no one has been harmed and when real harm takes place you don’t say anything. That is not right and not fair. I pray to God that nothing happens to anyone that is close to me and if it does it’s your fault. That’s my statement.

No, who started it?

Typical rabbit.

I might’ve talked shit but he punched me! I might’ve slapped him but then he hit back! Wah wah wah! I could never be the instigator!

I’m surprised he isn’t crying. You can get fake tear stuff online.

All right, is there anything else?

Reporter: Why do you think people think of you as a rapist?

Roosh: They need a target to get all the rage that the citizens have to put it on someone that doesn’t conflict with the agenda of your bosses and the ruling establishment. Roosh, go after him, it doesn’t matter if he gets hurt but we can’t go against our immigrant agenda. We can’t go against the feminist agenda. So we need to get the masses (the idiots who believe the stuff that you write) and put it on to something else. So you put it on me. I’m just a scapegoat. They are just using me.

Bear in mind what I re-quoted up top.
He asked for it.
He really wanted it.
He was gagging for it.

Yes, those are common appeals to the jury from rapists.

You know what really bothers me here? How low, how cheap, how evil, does a person have to be to use rape victims like that? For his own ‘agenda’? As a Get Out of Jail Free card? Not even that, a Criticism-Free Card.

But, I’m going to harness this. I’m going to harness all this coverage that you guys are giving me and convert it to money and women. That’s what I’m going to do. That’s the job that I have to do. I’m getting emails from a lot of girls right now and I plan (once this drama dies down if I can survive it) I may have to get in touch with them. That’s what you given me. You have made me one of the most famous men in the world. Granted, it was a lie. It was a lie. But hey, this is where we are right now so I’m going to work with what you gave me.

IF I did it……

….and he’s going to keep doing it. Officially, after this point, he deserves no empathy whoever he tries to rope in. He chooses to continue doing the same thing, and in an SJW-esque display of madness, expects a different result.

Female Reporter: Do you acknowledge that any of your writing might be genuinely offensive or upsetting to some people?

Roosh: So what?

He thinks that is a macho response. Pause. Drink it in.

American Psycho is the best satire of the 20th century

Like a little ghetto bitch.
Yeah, I called you a ho, so what? What are you gonna do about it, fight me? #seconds later# omg I can’t believe you hit me you crazy bitch!

If you make your private life public information, we’re allowed to judge. Again, you put your name, face and intimate life out there (in nauseating detail). You rejected your own legal right to privacy on those topics.

Female Reporter: Do you blame all of their reaction solely on media misinterpretation?

Roosh: I blame them for not reading what I write, for taking the mentality of a 10-year-old kid.

The ever-mature, You’re just too stupid to appreciate my genius! emo kid line.

Female Reporter: Your writing is offensive on its face.

Roosh: So what? So what? I have freedom of speech.

in AMERICA

in AMERICA

#grabs speakerphone#

IN AMERICAAAAAA.

(aka not where you wanted to hold your meetings)

Be offended, good, that means my writing got you.

3edgy5u

spot the fallacy: if you’re upset, you must be wrong

answer: non-sequitur

Female Reporter: So you acknowledge that you did provoke some of this yourself.

Roosh: I acknowledge that as a writer my job is to get attention and I did it. Right? But so what if you are offended. So what if I make fun of you? Is that we’re at right now that we can’t write things that hurt people’s feelings?

We’ve always been at that point, I wouldn’t expect you to understand. This is called the First World. It’s called etiquette and it’s the reason your ancestors came here from that Muslim shithole where gang rape is a fun family sport. How has nobody mentioned his sister? Must I do everything?

You can write whatever you want.
You can’t complain about the reaction.
Except you are. Is he borderline cos that would explain the entitlement and the constantly striving after a (neomasculine) identity.

Good, get offended, feel something, but don’t lie. Don’t lie. And that’s what you guys have done.

Don’t lie, says the guy who lies about his name.

Male Reporter: So do you consider yourself a victim in this scenario?

Roosh: You know what? No. [acts like it] I take full responsibility for everything that I have done but that doesn’t mean that I can’t state what you did wrong. [shifting the blame] I’m not saying “oh, I wish I could turn back the hands of time. I wish I didn’t write that article.” No, I wrote it. It came from my mind and it’s going to stay. But if you did something wrong then I get to  call you out on it too. Right?

He… he thinks he’s a moral authority.

scoff skarsgard

Female Reporter: So, do you have any regrets about publishing the article?

Roosh: None. None.

A man with a conscience would have mentioned his mother. I guess he ‘forgot’ to care now the topic of his own pain is off the menu and her shield status has expired.

Female Reporter: Well, you added this was a thought experiment this week. Do you regret not adding that early on?

That’s my question.

Roosh: I regret that people are so stupid that I have to put that in there right now. I never imagined that people would take that in a literal way to lie in order to push their miserable agenda. I never thought that you guys would lie about it. But now, because the masses believe the nonsense that you write, I have to treat everyone like an eight-year-old kid and say this [wait, say it? it wasn’t?] was a thought experiment even though to anyone who is not an idiot should have known that.

You should know the true meaning of what I write without me having to say, even though, as a writer, my entire purpose is clarity. He wants us to read his mind.

Expresses my feelings on this issue

Reporter: So why did you write it originally?

Roosh: Because I am a writer #slowclap# and I write things to make a point. That article was making a point about personal responsibility. That a woman’s safety is not only in the hands of men but it’s in their own hands too. That’s why. I guess that point didn’t get through, so on that account I did fail. I failed to give the point but that doesn’t mean that I did anything wrong. I did not.

#speechless#

Reporter: So a woman that got raped did something wrong.

Roosh: You know, if a woman got raped that is a sad thing. That is a bad thing.

Have you ever seen serial killers confess?
They feel the need to point out murder is bad, repeatedly, because they expect nobody else will know or remember if they don’t. That’s how out of touch this is.

But whose fault is it? #facepalming# Is it the woman fault? No, I’m not saying that. [literally just did, previous sentence] But a woman can do things to reduce the likelihood that she will get hurt. If I get a BMW car right now and I leave the key inside and I park it in a bad area and it gets robbed. Whose fault is that? Is it the thief’s fault? Or is it my fault for being a moron?

He keeps digging.
You think he’s done, but NO-

he keeps-

DIGGING.

There shouldn’t be thieves. Or rapists. That’s the moral point. You are a moron.

Reporter: It’s the thief’s fault.

Roosh: Okay, but would you advise me to leave the key in there? Of course not! Only an idiot would. So okay, so I’ll go ahead and be an idiot but don’t be mad when her car gets stolen. Just do the right things to keep yourself safe. We can’t even tell people what to do anymore to keep themselves safe? That’s weird.

By that logic, you could tell a person to do absolutely anything as long as you say it will keep them safe. Who are you to control other people? Who are you?

Reporter: When you say thought experiment, what was the thought experiment? What specifically?

Also my Q.

Roosh: The thought experiment is that if the government wasn’t completely holding the hand of adult women every step of the way and telling them that nothing you can do is wrong, maybe they would do a little bit of a better job not incapacitating themselves with alcohol and drugs and meeting random guys on the Internet that they don’t know and going to his house to watch Netflix.

You …teach men to do that. Just that. That’s literally your life’s work.
Doesn’t that make you the more responsible party?

sex with actual women mgtow infight

I think I could get laid by more women than Roosh. They certainly hit on me often enough.

Okay, and let’s hold men completely responsible for trying it on with a woman who isn’t 100% willing? Yes? No? Oh, you don’t think they’re a rapist? The Government shouldn’t completely hold the hand of adult men every step of the way and tell them nothing they do is wrong! Meeting random girls is risky! Drinking alcohol on a night out too! If you take that risk, you deserve a true/false rape accusation! For being a moron!

See how this works?

Reporter: But is this experiment just one blog post? Is it a website? Is it books?

Reporter 2: Can you just break down the lie? What I mean by that is can you break down the the crux of your article? Because some people here are unfamiliar, at least I am. I’m not from the Daily Mail.

Roosh: Can you read? I mean can you guys go. No, look guys, you want me to break it down. Read it!

The Do you even lift? of replies.

Down down down he goes…

Reporter: I mean how it got twisted by the media.

Roosh: The media said that the article said that this man wants to legalize rape. That was a lie.

WHY YOU MORON. HOW. SPECIFICALLY. REASONS. LOGIC.

Reporter: Okay, what part of your satirical argument that you’re making can you maybe understand that they took and turned it into that lie?

Roosh: Not honest. They were not honest and they knew it. The people who wrote that and said that the article is true, that that is a “pro-rape” article, they lied. That’s it. They are lying people. Most people in the media are liars.

He just keeps saying they’re liars without explaining as if that’s gonna wash.
Also, saying that to the media? Not smart. Doesn’t he call himself an entrepreneur?

Reporter: So you made a suggestion in this article which was what? Because I haven’t read it.

Roosh: Are you listening to what I’m saying, my friend? I’m telling you that I tried to make a point about personal responsibility. That’s what I did. Okay? You missed that point. Everyone here did. Some people got it. 

Is English his first language?

Reporter: Is this like a multi-year point though? You been trying to do this for like four, five, six years. What about, like, Return of Kings?

Roosh: Okay, is there an article there that you don’t like? That you got offended by?

Reporter: Well, on the front page as soon as you get there one click away it gives you a list of articles to read on “Rape Culture” Was Manufactured To Wage An Unjust War Against Men.

Roosh: Bingo.

WHYYYY.
I put myself through this so you guys don’t have to.

Reporter: The Equality Movement Is Allowing Women To Tyrannize Men. The Deregulation Of The Sexual Marketplace.

Roosh: Okay, you’re just reading headlines, man. Read the articles.

YOU WROTE THE FUCKING HEADLINES.
The outrage! The posturing! Faux brain cells!

Unless he’s admitting to writing clickbait, which makes him no better than the media he slags off.

Reporter: Is this is part of your thought experiment?

Roosh: No, these articles are making a point. [you said the same thing about the rape one] They provide evidence. [no] They provide arguments. [hella no] You’ve read it and you take from it what you want [you can’t write for toffees?] but don’t then go into your media outlet to lie about it. [you haven’t explained the lie though, still, making us doubt there was one]

Reporter: Is the satire something else?

Roosh: How to Stop Rape was a satirical article.

as opposed to…?

Reporter: Okay.

Roosh: These are not.

None of the others? Is this official? So unless tagged, serious?

Female Reporter: So, you know the outrage isn’t only about that one article. A lot of people think that you’re writing about women in general being submissive and [bad audio]. It’s also offensive.

Roosh: I don’t care. #press conference holds shakily#

Female Reporter: Is that something that you believe?

Roosh: Do I believe that a woman should submit to a man? Yes. Does that mean that my family’s address should be put online because of that? And the media should stake out their home because of what I write? No. Using these lies to incite these idiots on the Internet? No.

Wait, that is rape. That is literally the definition of rape, the physical, sexual submisson part. Yes, you do believe in rape. What does Islam mean again, to submit? Submission is not a choice or regarding of consent or human freedom, it is forced. He is trying to play traditional people with this neomasculinity crap but we know the use of the words we choose and it’s submission of a wife to her husband, as they mutually agreed in their vows, not A woman to A man, a random man she owes nothing.

No woman should submit to him because he is a bachelor, a word as insulting as spinster because they require no social respect. The command about submission only applies to married folk, and only when there is a conflict (rare), it doesn’t mean She Does Everything He Says. It means the woman backs down in the event of a dispute within the house. That’s it, a small trivial point rarely exercised. A woman is not a slave (his inner Muslim is coming out). The majority of the time they are a team, a single unit, the House against the World, such an imbalance of tyrant and slave would drive the marriage to dissolution.

Hark the entitlement goes deeper.

Reporter: What’s your justification for believing that women should be submissive? That seems to be…

Roosh: I’m not here to argue why I believe what I do. #yes# #yes you are# Okay? You have to go online, I’ve been writing for years and years, if you really care about that go do your homework. I’m just here to talk about the events of the past week.

He sounds like an omega in this. They’re spiteful and vengeful. They’ll obsess for years and plot. Reams of paper he spilled ink on these topics, it would make sense.

Reporter: I did read some of the things that you wrote and I’m curious and a lot of people here meeting you for the first time are curious to know where you…

With these rude interruptions (why are PUAs always rude little shits?), he’ll get a little dot by his name on their files.
Code Don’t Go Easy.
Keep digging, fool.

Roosh: I really think that you guys don’t read things. You see, Caitlin will write something

Note how the stupid wrong person in his examples is always female?

and you’re like “Okay, Caitlin’s article it’s getting hits so I’m going to copy and paste hers”. So it’s like a game. You guys are writing the same thing. I’m just try to understand what is happened. As you can see of been under a lot of stress [AMYG-DALA!] from all this mob that is coming after me because of the things that you wrote that don’t conform to the real world. I don’t get it. And it’s clear to me that you guys haven’t done your research. You’re ready to write that this guy is pro-rape without knowing where that false idea comes from.

Remember: rabbits project.
It’s you! It’s your fault! You’re deluded! They can’t possibly have read what I wrote because it’s impossible to disapprove of, even though I said I like offending people [above] and even if they did disapprove, I don’t care, so what? What are they gonna do, hit me?
#wait#
Stop talking about the things I wrote after I said multiple times in this very speech I enjoyed the attention!

Female Reporter: Roosh, I have a question for you from the Bang books. So I obviously have done my research and there are several instances…

Roosh: I know. She has known about me.

Female Reporter: …There are several instances in the Bang books where you recount having sex with women who were too drunk or incapacitated to consent. Now people reading that would certainly come away with the impression that you raped those women.

Man is drunk? Roosh calls it rape and backs the MRAs, bleating about ma ooman rights. The rapist must be locked up! This is evil!
Woman is drunk? Roosh calls it seduction and charges men to read about it. He must be respected in his ‘rights’ and allowed to profit and say anything Little Rooshie feels like! This is good – for men!

But he doesn’t hate women! He just treats us differently! …. Less human. That isn’t misogynistic….

#sound of flickering dictionary pages#

Here’s the definition of misogyny!

Hatred of females.
(under Hatred, this is a Psychology Dictionary)
A deep, enduring intense emotion expressing animosity, anger and hostility toward a person, group or object. Hatred is usually assumed to be characterized by a) the desire to harm or cause pain to the object of the emotion and b) feelings of pleasure from the object’s misfortunes. [rabbits’ MO, clearly we need to scan Roosh’s brain, Roosh, the guy who admits to watching rape porn]
(under Sexism)
A prejudice based on sex. …First, a prejudice is generally treated as an attitude or belief, while the term sexism generally connotes differential action and behaviour towards persons which discriminates them on the basis of their sex. Second, the term is nearly always used with respect to discrimination against females, a unitary focus that derives from the objective data of society but which unfortunately delimits the meaning of the term.

See? Completely different to what Roosh does.
Not.

Most of his articles are literally sexist. That’s why feminists mention ‘double standard’ so often, holding a double standard on the basis of sex (not some other third factor) is literally sexist. He does it all the time. As I pointed out, in that pro-rape article, he wanted not rape legalized, but specifically the rape of women. That is the very definition of sexism. Like if I said ‘men can’t be primary caregivers’ that is purely based on their sex, nothing about possible ability for the act (individual-based potential/likely ability is moot for discussion, it doesn’t matter), and marks them out, discriminates them as subject on the basis of their sex. Their demographic group. Ding ding Prejudice Lane.

Roosh: I don’t know anyone except for maybe you that thinks that [Reggie? Can we get Reggie Yates on line 1 Cheryl?] and people who have lost their minds when it comes to consensual sex. [gaslighting again oh dear]

Also, consensual sex is just sex. No need to point it out.
~coughs and points to the serial killer thing~

People who don’t have any idea what girls are doing outside right now and what they will do in an hour or two once they get drunk and pick the guy that they like and let him do whatever he wants with her. So macho sex writing, to convert that to rape takes such a leap of faith that you have to be a liar to think that’s true.

Questioning someone’s true memory of a thing you literally wrote is also gaslighting.

Could you all imply my facepalming so I needn’t type it?

Female Reporter: You literally say that they were too incapacitated to consent.
#cheering from the peanut gallery#
Roosh: Macho sex writing is not a court. It’s not a piece of evidence that you can… Maybe some things I wanted to come across as an aggressive guy. Maybe I did. But just because there doesn’t means that there is a victim out there and she suffered. Have I raped anyone? No.

wow omg likey

Actually real name/identity blog posts and published works are admissible in a court of law.
European law, at least.
And if you’re selling books as true, when you know you fudged the details, that is Passing Off and other trade infractions, including fraud…

It seems like a matter of time before he’s literally telling it to the judge. Never seen a speech this bad. None of them are even lawyers, can you imagine? They could sell the court tape, I’d buy one.

Reporter: Is that fiction?

Roosh: No. It’s not. My interpretation of it may be, but she’s just taking quotes out of context anyway.

no =/= maybe
either it’s a quote OR it’s out of context

and he’s calling them stupid?

Reporter: You made a point that you have an office that overlooks a golf course. You made that clip about speed before is that true?

Roosh: Golf course?

Reporter: Yeah.

Roosh: I have no idea what you’re talking about. Golf course?

Reporter: Yes, you have an office that overlooks a golf course.

Roosh: I don’t remember ever saying that, man.

I do not recall.

Reporter: You mentioned the immigrant agenda and the feminist agenda before. I’m trying to get a better idea of what your personal politics are.

Roosh: I would say that it’s anti-globalists which the Daily Beast represents a globalist type of platform.

You travel the world, for work, you are a globalist.

Reporter: What do you mean by globalist?

Roosh: Anything that benefits the current top 1000 men in the world in the US and Europe. You have a globalists and you have the nationalists. I would lean more towards a nationalist. Tradition, patriarchy, local solutions instead of globalization.

hahaha fuck you

Degenerate scum thinks it’s people. Pat pat.
You wish you were cool.
You didn’t wanna know before the power balance shifted. Called us all sorts of things for defending our countries, even now when we enforce our borders against the likes of you.
A Patriarchy (married men, fathers) would hang him (bachelor) in the town square for seduction and rape.
Patriarchy is not kind to men. It is cruel to bachelors and spinsters. Patriarchy is kind to traditional people who don’t ‘play’ around (ever) and spread disease (he admitted he’s failed to use condoms).

BTW You don’t deliver ‘local solutions’ by skipping the country.

Reporter: So does that mean you’re voting for?

Roosh: Donald Trump comes the closest to what I think is true.

Please let Trump ban him from the USA as a Muslim. Please. It’d be so funny. Cancel his passport one time, just to see his face.
I happen to know for a fact that Mr Trump is a delightful fellow in private, who loves women. He won’t side with you, Roosh the Douche. He is married with children. Note the rabbity technique of siding with the largest group, largest reputed male authority figure, trying to pass themselves off as One of Us? For personal protection?

#chicken noises#

Female Reporter: You express concern about your family after you were doxxed. Does that make you regret threatening to doxx reporters and protesters? Who…

Roosh: I never threatened that. I said I was going to make a list of the names and the social networking accounts. I never said I was going to share their address. That was another lie. Another lie is that I live with my mom. It’s like you guys can’t stop lying. A man can’t visit his mom? I wished I lived with her! But no, that was a lie. See now, I don’t think it’s a good idea to say it but I live somewhere in Europe.

…………………I’m guessing on a visa?

So I’m just here for a short time and I happen to be here and the Daily Mail… I have to say though they had a lens that was far away I was like what’s that over there and you see on the Internet it was right there so… There’s people outside my dad’s house now probably.

http://europe.newsweek.com/roosh-v-return-kings-meeting-422724
Literal Quote: “We must hold journalists fully accountable for their incitement.”
If the post was innocuous, why did he lock it?

Female Reporter: You own that house then right?

Roosh: No, I don’t own the house.

Female Reporter: It’s registered in your name.

Roosh: Well, I don’t know how. #cringe#

Female Reporter: So it’s not your house?

Roosh: It’s not my house. Okay let me stop that and start again. So I don’t want to stay here all night with you guys. I have other things that I have to do so were going to wrap this up at 8 o’clock. Cool?

All that talk of being liars, he sure wants to put a stop to any easy Y/N questions…

Reporter: What else has happened these last couple of days? Did you get dozens of [bad audio]. Has your phone been ringing off the hook? Or your parents’ phone?

Roosh: You know, I think from a security standpoint it’s not smart to share that kind of stuff.

Like he said about celebrity rape claims, we can’t just believe him because he said it happened. Without proof, he must be lying. We have to assume that first now. There are just too many professional victims going around trying to rentseek, sorry.

Reporter: Where do you office out of? Do you find yourself writing on the road?

Roosh: There’s a golf course that is outside of my office… No.

(Laughter)

Roosh: I’m mobile, so um. Office out of, I never heard that kind of phrase before (laughs) but Starbucks? You know?

Reporter: Can you confirm that you did have to upgrade the DDOS protection on the website after the threats?

Roosh: We already had it because my servers were attacked last year. So we already had the systems in place but they were sending 20 million false requests every hour.

Reporter: Actually 20 million?

Roosh: Yeah, that’s the actual number.

Sounds like an anon op.

This was on Tuesday. Monday and Tuesday. Once the Australian thing hit. Now I must say, when the Australia thing hit that was a lot of fun because those people were obsessed about me and I was telling them that I was to come in by boat. But then the shit kind of got real once it came here, you know? Having fun with them is good but when they announce your address and are advising people to go down that then it’s no longer fun.

What, see you in person? For your shitposting online? Right of reply?
Hey, you wanted meetups.
Someone could even say you needed to take some… ‘personal responsibility’.
The only person responsible for your safety, after all, is yourself. If someone attacks you, it might not be entirely their fault. Something you wrote might have provoked them in the same way a short skirt might provoke a rapist. That was the key takeaway message of the article, wasn’t it? That if you can’t completely ensure your physical safety, and nobody can, crime perpetrated against you is somehow your fault. Even a little?

Reporter: Would you say that media misinterpretation is the best thing that ever happened to you?

Roosh: The best and the worst. I mean what’s going to happen now? I’m going to be known, because of you, as a pro-rape advocate for the rest of my life until I die. Oh, that’s the guy that believes that all women should be raped. But at the same time they’re going to say that’s the guy. They’re going to know me. I could take a dump in a box right now and sell it because of you. So that’s what you have done to me. You have made me such a famous guy. I was a guy with the blog, just a guy with a blog, and you have taken me from here to this based on a lie. Now, I’d rather you had not done that but it happened and that is life right? So you’ve got to deal with what actually happens.

Reporter: Would you consider donating some of that money to a rape crisis center?

Roosh: (laughs) I mean I think that the fact that the entire mainstream is trying to stop rape and assault against women I think they’re doing fine. But if they want to donate money to me to help with the bodyguards that I have to hire right now then they are more than welcome to.

Wait, wait –what?

We’re meant to feel sorry for you because YOU don’t feel physically safe?
Are you fucking kidding?

I just… I can’t even. Wow. Just wow. Such irony. Much sexism. Wow.

Reporter: How many bodyguards do you have around you right now?

Roosh: Unfortunately, I can’t share that right now but you can count which guys back there are kind of large, you know?

How many are ROK readers?
Zero, because they’re all pussies.

Reporter: So what are the plans for the next couple of days?

Roosh: The next couple of days is really, probably, to get out of town since it is a little bit hot right now.

Run rabbit run rabbit
run run run…

It’s not that I really think someone is going to come and stab me but it’s not smart to stay in the city where everyone knows where I am at. So I will probably go up or down the East Coast.

Reporter: How often do you return for your mom’s meatloaf?

Roosh: I come for the meatloaf once a year for like one month. And hey, you know, I like to stay with her. I wish I could stay more. I was trying to stay for a month but now, because of this, I had to say goodbye to her.

Mommy Issues.
Hey, he calls the opposite on random women all the time, I think that’s fair.

Reporter: Have you had any trouble traveling internationally yet and you expect it?

Roosh: No. I think England did not go ahead and say that I’m banned. I don’t think Australia will let me in now.

That’s cos you cancelled beforehand. It was unnecessary.

Reporter: Do you plan on trying to go to Australia?

Roosh: I don’t see why I would go there. Yep.

Female Reporter: What does your mom think about all this?

Roosh: My mom is angry. My mom is very angry.

Female Reporter: At you?

Roosh: Not at me. At you guys. She wants me to hit you guys back. Like you don’t understand a Middle Eastern mom, they get angry. I’m having to calm her down because she wants to fight. I’m saying Mom you gotta simmer down now. But no, she said son I support you, do what you gotta do, this is a matter of your speech and as long as you’re not doing anything illegal.

His mother is more of a man than he’ll ever be.
Not a good man, supporting that, but still.
When it comes out he’s done something illegal (over so many years there must be something that sticks) I wonder what she’ll do.

Reporter: What does she think of your treatment of women?

Roosh: Treatment of women? My mom doesn’t know. My mom doesn’t know how I make love to this girl or that girl. [but you film it] She knows who I am. She knows that whatever I write on the Internet and the monster that you have made me there that I have never hurt a woman. [no she explicitly said she supports you AS LONG AS you aren’t a criminal, there’s a catch] You would think by now, guys, that one girl would come forward and say “Yeah, Roosh did it, he raped me”.

Is he seriously tempting fate that hard?

One, you would think. Not one has come forward. Not one. Even though I have been known everywhere. So how do you explain that? Not one.

He seems to be implying that rape doesn’t count unless it’s recorded.
As if plenty don’t go to the police for whatever reason. They can still come out later.
#coughs Bill Clinton, Bill Bill Clinton Bill#
Just because you’ve been alright so far doesn’t mean you’ve got away with it.

It is weird how a lie can get to this point in time. So I’m not sure what the function of the media is because if you’re just going to lie and when the public is really in threat like in Germany was. Women in Germany right now are in threat. You don’t protect them but you come against me, what are you doing?

Reporter: The media cover that pretty extensively. I can email you a bunch of… (offers proof)

Roosh: After the outrage came. From day one? No.

Reporter: That is absolutely not true.

Reporter is correct. Roosh is lying. The media is covering it plenty, actually.
Previously, they were blocked by politicians in the EU, because it was an ongoing case and they didn’t want the illegals to disappear and skip to another country, that wasn’t the media per se. Blame Schengen.

Reporter: Back to what Caitlin was saying earlier, do you at least agree that, legally speaking, the technical legal definition that a woman is too drunk to consent to sex and you have sex with her, that is legally defined as rape. Can you at least…

Roosh: How about the man? If the man is drunk, can he consent to rape? [impossible]

Reporter: We can talk about that in a moment.

Roosh: No, no. It’s the same thing.

If it’s the same thing, and drunk men are categorically raped, then yes, you did rape them, the drunk women.

Reporter: No, no, no, you’re not answering the question.

Roosh: You’re not going to tell me what is right and wrong.

Spoken like a true psychopath. Indignation over questioning their morality, because they have none, so they won’t be able to explain it (like how he couldn’t explain the supposed lie).
They don’t actually know, that’s the joke. They change it, verbally, as they need to manipulate people.

Reporter: Okay, woman, man, whatever, that is a legal definition of rape. Do you disagree with the legal definition of rape?

Roosh: If a man is drunk and a woman has sex with him is it rape?

Reporter: Yes.

Female Reporter: It is not the legal definition of rape in many places though.

Reporter: In many places no…

Roosh: You’re trying to redefine the definition of consensual sex so that every man is on the hook for rape. That is what you’re trying to do. So no, I don’t agree with you.

No, the example was a female rapist.
He’s trying so hard to be a psychopath with this I’m gonna say borderline again, they idolize psychos.
Apparently drunk men are fair game to him from now on. So hey, let’s wait until he’s drunk and pay a really fat feminist to sleep with him. Come on, it’ll be funny. We can film it (since he also advocates that every time a man has sex) and split the royalties.

Reporter: Do you believe Bill Cosby is a rapist?

Roosh: I haven’t seen all of the evidence but I think that it’s weird that 20 years after… [that’s a No despite drugging them, hmmm…, will anyone ask if he’s handled drugs?]

Reporter: If any of these women came back and said “Oh, Roosh did whatever”, here is somebody with a long history of…

Roosh: The evidence that I have seen is girls wanted to be with him and take drugs with him, and then 20 years after that say that he hurt them.

No, they didn’t want to, that’s why he slipped it in their drink.
Deception.
And why would they want to take drugs that make them unconscious? Out cold? With no memory? Drugs a rapist would use, that give no thrill to the victim? And why would he wait for sex until they were out cold?

The Muslim genes express themselves eventually, don’t they?
He literally doesn’t see the problem. He is blind to it. He cannot see, like Bill’s victims after the coffee.

Reporter: So you don’t agree that that is a legal definition of rape?

Roosh: I don’t think that they are being honest.

That was a yes or no question. He’s being evasive at his own gig.

Reporter: If they were?

Roosh: If they were, look man I’m not a lawyer. See this is where we are right now where the mainstream is so obsessed about rape. [no you chose the topic to write that article] We don’t even know what consensual sex [just sex, it isn’t sex without consent, it’s rape] is anymore. This is what we have done. [sharing the blame? no that fails] So no you’re coming after me for an article where, clearly, I didn’t intend for people to think that I want all rape to be legal. [no not all rape, just rape of all women] So we’ve lost our minds. [gaslighting] From now on about sex, the United States is just gone. [then revoke your citizenship] We don’t know what sex is anymore. We don’t know what consensual sex is anymore and that’s because of the work that you have done.

Normal people with a healthy conscience know what consent is.
They have never required the media to inform them.

Reporter: How did this become your issue? We all have different issues we care about passionately, how did this become yours?

Roosh: It’s not my issue. I’ve written over 3000 articles and maybe 10 of them were about rape.

Yes, like “How Women Train Men to Rape“.
And, remember that serial killer confession point again?
How could I forget “Six Reasons You Should Not Rape A Girl.
Hint: None of them are ‘because it’s evil‘.

His #1 reason? It hurts your penis. …How would he know?
He goes on to list “Hypothetical reversals” for when it’s acceptable. No really.
#2 Self-exposure to STDs. #wait for it#
#3 Prison (being caught)
#4 Child support (I am not making this up)
#5 Hookers are easier.
“Hypothetical reversal: You want to experience the rush that comes from committing a felony.” He sounds experienced.
#6 Finding a slut and tricking her into bed is easier (and presumably not rape in his twisted mind).
Considering all the blather about drunk women, consider this finishing paragraph.
“If you’re reading this right now, it’s safe to assume you already have the morals that prevent you from becoming physically violent against a woman, but for the man who has been raised by lions, I hope this list helps him understand the self-harm of committing such a horrible act. As long as you don’t confuse violent rape with the legal act of sleeping with a promiscuous girl that’s as intoxicated as you, you should be okay.”

Crazy people think if something isn’t explicitly on the lawbooks, it’s okay. That it’s moral, in fact. That is their damage.

And as for Roosh’s personal blog, we all know he typed this gem with his own two hands.

rooshvrapistdrunk

Roosh: “During sex, all the power belongs to the male… She doesn’t care about equality, or protecting women from men like me; she just deeply resents the fact that sex is where men completely dominate.”
Other people have been quoting him too.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
In the UK at least, this is illegal.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/2015/07/21/roosh-explains-how-he-gets-always-unprotected-raw-sex-no-matter-if-she-insisted-for-condom/
This is rape. Consent is conditional, as I have explained before and cited the relevant statute. If a woman says ‘with a condom’, it isn’t a negotiation. There is no compromise. It’s either sex or rape.
“Roosh explains that he lies about his STDs, and that all the men should lie about their STDs or if they were ever tested, this way assuring that raw unprotected sex will happen.”
Also rape, and criminal charges like ABH may be placed (Actual Bodily Harm) for knowingly passing on a venereal disease.
Roosh: “I’ve had several girls insert my beautiful naked cock inside them while chanting “Get a condom !”
“Girls are supposedly the more intuitive of our species, but if so many feel right about fucking me without a condom, then I must conclude that they don’t know shit. They’re all dirty little whores who truly disgust me with their sex habits. I don’t care if she’s a lawyer, government worker, or environmentalist—if she lives in a metropolitan city and fucked you by the third date, she’s a bucket of disease”

Hey, he wanted us to go read his stuff, I’m obliging.

Do you think he’ll ever look in the mirror one day and hate himself? I don’t.

Reporter: [bad audio] (starting to doubt this transcript is honest)

Roosh: Because when I was in college I want to learn how to make love to every attractive girl that I saw. [whatever their wishes] So I needed to learn which skills that I had to do. Is there anyone that I have not called on yet because I’m trying to think of who is kind of quite. Why are you guys here then?

Reporter: Martha Stewart over there.

(Laughter)

Female Reporter: Um, are you happy?

(Laughter)

Roosh: That’s why we didn’t call on her. I mean happiness is what? Am I happy that people have the wrong impression of who I am? No! But am I happy that I’m probably going to cash in on this as long as I can survive the next couple days? Hey, you gave it to me, you gave me a package and now I will run with it. You can’t turn the clock back. [famous last words]

Reporter: How much have you made off of this in total?

Roosh: You know I have to get my accountant to really tally it. Has sales of books gone up? Yes. Has advertising sales gone up? Yes.

Reporter: What is your vision for the future for male-female relations?

Roosh: (laughs) Okay, well, what I’ve been trying to show on my website is that equality doesn’t work. I mean it doesn’t. If we have a divorce rate that is 50% or more, it doesn’t work. [most of those are 2nd, 3rd… divorces, many by men] I think we have to go back to the days where the man leads the household. [you don’t have a household, your opinion is invalid] I think that’s the only way. But are we in the US? I don’t think so. I think there’s a couple of countries left where we can, maybe in Eastern Europe. The Muslim countries… You guys love Islam so I’m thinking that you guys would love… You guys give it a pass. They have a patriarchal system in the household. Do you get on them for that? In an Islamic marriage, there are some Muslim guys here, rape cannot happen during a marriage. Do you write about that? No.

Reporter: Yes.

Roosh: No you don’t.

Reporter: Yeah we do. I’ll send you a bunch of links on that.

He keeps lying, it’s so sad.

Roosh: Please do, please do. And I’m going to read them carefully. But you guys give it a pass, you guys give Islam a pass for a patriarchal model that I write about but you come after me. Can we get something over here?

Female Reporter: She’s just my photographer.

Roosh: (Sighs)

Female Reporter: I am mostly here just to listen. Everyone else has mostly covered all the questions that I would’ve asked so.

Roosh: Ask anything.

Female Reporter: Why did you pick this hotel?

Roosh: I used to actually come here on dates. I used to bring dates here. This was back in 2000s. This was a place where I used to bring a date. We would sit on a couch upstairs and I would make my smooth moves on them here. This was 2005, 2006.

Reporter: Just to clarify something earlier, you were saying that Donald Trump was the closest. Besides the anti-PC stuff, what do you like about his 2016 campaign?

Roosh: He hates you guys too.

Reporter: Besides that.

Roosh: That’s enough for me. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Reporter: The media is not a political ideological position.

Roosh: Becoming anti-establishment is. You don’t understand, half you will be out of a job within five years time. [also, wow]

Post-collapse, bloggers will starve. You have no other skills. You’re a parasite
(I don’t monetize because of this, giving me time to do useful things, this is a hobby).

Reporter: So you like that he is nationalist and anti-establishment.

Roosh: And the reason is you’re not serving the needs of the public. You’re not. The establishment sites are losing views and I’m sure a lot of you have not seen your salaries increase in the way that you wanted. It’s because we don’t believe in the mainstream anymore. In this case, what you did to me is now showing the world what you guys do and how you operate.

They’ve been asking reasonable questions, douche.

Reporter: I didn’t do anything to you…

Female Reporter: Why did you end up canceling all the meetings? Because a lot of them weren’t going to be protested right?

Roosh: A lot of them were. I would say at least half of them. This news made it to Russia.

Female Reporter: [bad audio]

Roosh: Who said they’re not? You know, a mistake that I made was saying lets let these masculine, strong men organize, who hate the government, probably, and meet. That was kinda dumb. Because this could be a threat against us. So if we have to go underground, I’ll go underground. We never had a goal where we had to do everything in public.

Sounds like a terror cell.
Is he going to join Islamic State next? Full terrorist final form? He already praised their system where they kill, rape and starve little girls. They’d be dead by now without Western aid.

Reporter: If you and the people who follow your website closely are so strong, why do it in secret?

Roosh: Are you going to go to a meeting where the cops are on you?

As if the secret police are going to announce they’re secret police, goddamn.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

If MI5 doesn’t already have a UK agent on this under deep cover I’ll eat my hat. This cheeky Robin Hood number.
Isn’t he proud of his ideas? #chicken noise# Dare you to get a soapbox in London, it has plenty of Muslims.

Reporter: I have before. [this is a specimen Roosh is unacquainted with, a man with balls]

Roosh: I don’t like this guy. I mean he’s just being argumentative. #CHICKEN NOISE INTENSIFIES#

Female Reporter: Was there supposed to be a public component at all to these meetings?

Roosh: No, it was just the most efficient way to organize people who like me and who like my site. Hey guys, just meet here at this time.

Female Reporter: They were not planning on doing anything there. They were just going to hang out, right?

Roosh: No, okay, I’m going to tell you. There were going to meet at that point and say where’s the Pet Shop? It’s right here. Okay, hey cool, what your name? Where are you from? There’s a bar over here let’s go for a drink. That was it! That was it and then the worldwide anger came.

and discuss what? a bar is public so… if we recorded you, that would be alright?

Reporter: But again if they’re strong, masculine, brave, why the subterfuge? #slowclap#

Roosh: Because you have angered a mob that wants to disrupt their meeting because you have gotten governments against them by lying about their intention.

Why not prove them wrong by showing up and being peaceable? Unless you didn’t want to be peaceable. Rabbits are such cowards. Yes, run along. Run along. You were called out and exposed, you got burned.

Now the world thinks that they’re going to meet to rape people. So why are they going to meet now? Do you think it’s smart to go and meet now? After that? You would go to a meeting where everyone is targeting you as a potential person who is going to rape. That’s what you would do? Of course not! You don’t seem like the type that would stand up to someone who is coming against you. I mean, do you lift? You don’t lift.

What, I was kidding above, I didn’t think-

Reporter: No, I don’t.

Roosh: I do lift but I lost some weight.

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

laughing rdj crack up

I’m just saying, like, this guy is saying go into the fire. Who is going to do that?

A MAN.

A male with conviction and honour.

That’s absurd! This is where all these absurd ideas come from, from you guys. It doesn’t make any sense! It doesn’t make any sense. (sighs) So we got five more minutes.

Reporter: Do you feel that leaving town or having bodyguards takes away from your masculinity?

#wheezes#

#dying of laughter#

Roosh: No! If your life is in danger, no. [it isn’t, are SJWs a true physical threat or not?] If you want to stand up and fight and get into a confrontation, that’s fine, but right now the heat is on my mom and dad so me leaving is going to take the heat away. [no nobody threatened them] So I am considering them in the actions that I do. Last summer I had two speeches in Montréal and Toronto and the same anger came. What did I do? I stood there.

[You ran like a little bitch, turned and flipped them off from behind bodyguards and a closed door, it’s on camera. I saw the footage.]

Why? Because my family was not in danger. They didn’t post their address. For the record, I held the speeches even though the mayors came out against me but now it’s not worth a public happy hour to go against the police, governors, mayors, and all that stuff and put the safety and privacy of the men who follow me… I can’t toss them into that. [hey at least they won’t be raped] I can toss myself into that. [yeah] I can hire a bodyguard. [no, then you’re risking the bodyguard] I can go out right now and drink (which I will) but I’m not going to put them in danger. [If it came down a choice of Them or You, you would though, wouldn’t you? r-type scum, no loyalty] That would be like just looking out for me instead of the men who trust the things that I do.

I think he cancelled because HE didn’t wanna show up.

Female Reporter: How many men would you say those are?

Roosh: It’s hard to say, but based on the site traffic that I get for Return of Kings, I get one million uniques each month. Out of the hard-core people who really follow me it could be as high as 200,000.

Forum stats are much lower and more accurate. Lies.

Female Reporter: And how many of them were you expecting to go to these meetups around the world?

Roosh: There’s no way to know because it was just show up. Okay, so we got time for one more.

There’s no way to know because you **cancelled**.

Reporter: How many women have you been with?

Roosh: (sighs) A lot. I have been with a lot, but that’s not relevant to the current matter at hand. But thank you. Thank you all for coming. I expect more lies in your articles that are going to come up but I just wanted to do this to show what the truth is. Okay? So have a good night.

He counts notches (ew) but refuses to state a number?
Yeah, he’s lying, it’s much lower than people expect.
I heard a really good joke that he’s probably a virgin. I wish it was funny but I refuse to laugh at female pain.

Sorry, up top I assumed this would be brief but the Questions took up a lot of time and I had good material.

Why are the traditionalists rejecting Roosh V as a disgusting degenerate?

He wanted to become the MSM face of PUA and he managed it. He doesn’t seem to like what that means – personal criticisms when you make your personal life public business.

Note: I was neutral on the guy until I researched this, because I limited myself to reading his cultural critiques. Now I want to throw up. I have a strong stomach and I feel nauseous typing this up for you all. You have been warned.

Welcome Jury, to the public trial of one Daryush Valizadeh, better known as Roosh V.

Take a good, long look at the defendant.

roosh v Daryush Valizadeh

Drink it in. International playboy. Did he seriously get a nosejob?

He slags off female appearance for a living despite giving no advice in this area to men (as if looks don’t matter – only for men, conveniently!) while simultaneously calling all women superficial and having no advice to give, clearly.

Recently, he’s tried to hop the fence between degenerate r-type and respectable K. Except those pesky K-types won’t let him. He likes to think he would have got away with it too, if it hadn’t been for those darn feminists! Let’s take a look at why he is barred from every group of genuinely traditional people and so must make his own using words he obviously doesn’t understand, from entries he wrote on his public blog (mostly titles, for time) that you may you look up at your leisure and pause to consider what would happen to this male in the Patriarchy he craves.

rooshrespectsnothing

If you’re like us, your reaction to that hard-won proof (I suffered for you, like Jesus) will be a hard redpilling of this Roosh’s true nature, whatever words he calls himself as this farce continues.

In the Patriarchy he desperately desires, he’d be strung up from a lamp-post for defiling somebody’s virgin daughter.

I think of this whenever I see a mob baying for blood online

As people with a conscience, soul and sense of decency, we may only hope the Patriarchy returns and he gets what he wished for. K-shift is coming, degenerates.

One day genetic engineering will prove us victors

Why does the manosphere think it has the moral high ground?

It doesn’t. At all. In fact, it’s actually worse than feminism in some respects because they know full well how wrong what they encourage and do really is, they see the damage to society and keep doing it because other people are (begging if they jumped off a cliff…). They seem to be dallying with the Alt Right since this EU crisis (whatever) and some dipping their toe into Neoreaction (fine) ideas and acting shocked and pearl-clutching like the worst SJWs when these traditional people reject them. Like, actually traditional, as in living it. Or in politer circles, when they ignore them, hoping they’ll go away.

They don’t get it.
They don’t have the moral high ground.

I have a mixed readership so allow me to explain a bit.

Off the top of my head, like Feminist vs. PUA … let’s consider the so-called ‘degenerate’ behaviours they verbally lambaste when (feminist) women do it while hypocritically enacting them or endorsing them in their common conversations with others who are/will do them aka incitement. (Looks misogynist to an outsider because it is, in some cases, like how dare a single woman support herself with a job – when the alternative is welfare).
I’ve gone for the practical, somewhat PC term destructive because it’s easier to agree upon.

fuckingdegenerates

None of those people with the spare time to push these Zeitgeist online have a real job or an actual life. Their Apocalypse Value is zero. They deserve zero respect. AKA r-types gonna r.

And they wonder why the traditional people are giving them the side-eye.

Really?

She sLAYS them

It comes from a puerile understanding of masculinity, including the laughable attempt to ape Neoreaction’s success with ‘Neomasculinity’, where r-types pretend to reform and play both sides (I guess you could say, game both sides) by talking about K-ideas, what an effort... and bitch “Why won’t women (who aren’t married to me and owe me nothing) submit to me?” when they’ve done literally nothing to prepare for that role and on the contrary, much to disqualify them from the MMP.
As if anyone in their Right mind (pun wholly intended) is going to take pointers on how to be a man from Roosh. Do you want his life? Is it aspirational for traditionalists up until now? What’s your gut telling you? A person’s past and choices can’t lie for them.

Their troubles seem to come from a very convenient excuse to avoid maturity.

Men aren’t exempt from prosocial behaviour, far from it, they’re supposed to be more virtuous to lead women and establish societal standards.

p.s. I see the spelling error and I don’t care.