Female power in the occult

https://www.clairenakti.com/articles/what-is-the-real-essence-of-beauty


Reminds me of Taoism.
Taoism doesn’t actually have sexual practices (however some have twisted it to try and claim they do) for that reason. It is the spiritual overcoming the physical. To “de-base” yourself again completely extinguishes the work already built on. Monasteries and nunneries were rooted in this idea.

The wise men don’t want to be drained (and by strangers) and be thrown off with bad karma (like a creative block or stumped feeling, apathy or obstacle event). Action —> Result. You choose one, you choose the other.
Historically a promiscuous man is considered weak in all religions (except Satanism, you’ll note*) because the male path of enlightenment involves impulse control, that’s the male power. Think of a military general. A promiscuous woman gives up something that is (because of her chosen condition) worth nothing, quite a disgusting notion to people who believe in sanctity, and promiscuous men also don’t value their energies as special either, so their own influence disappears from themselves like morning dew (and they typically blame women for ‘tempting them’, projecting the problem is typical). This leads to a permanent dissolving of willpower (death of will) eventually, they call it “player burnout” online but it’s really like tapping your own veins and draining your blood then wondering why you’re weak. Idiots with scant self-awareness had little influence to spare in the first place, and so drain themselves into a curious blend of melancholy, apathy and furious self-pity faster than other, hardier men. Celibate men were respected in saner times because they had power (of the self) and this produced a laser-like focus and it’s no coincidence so many geniuses did their best work while surrendering sexually to no women.

How much bland art was clearly made by a degenerate who slept with the subjects?

How much great art was made by homosexual men, who couldn’t possibly be tempted by a woman? (or married hetero men for other reasons).

How does the art of each make you feel? Typically, the first makes people feel unclean but the latter a strange purity.

Women seen as inspiration on a collective level strengthens a man.

To surrender sexually to an improper woman or to be an improper man individually is draining (like the trail of bad luck following degeneracy that can even be seen in statistics like suicide risk). At best, the man tries to take on a female role (Lord Byron hoovering up muse figures, Wilde the same with men) and this is repellent to those who believe that men should be masculine (most men, back then) and stand firm in their principles. This is the ultimate cause of those principles and as you can see, it isn’t a double standard at all. If women aren’t meant to sleep around, that implies directly men aren’t meant to either, otherwise they’d have to become homosexual. Patriarchies protect men from wasting themselves by masturbating inside various women (it’s a loveless union) although when it overdoes this or for unclear reasons lost over time, the subjects assume it’s keeping them away from the “fun” (a child’s assumption) because they don’t understand the risk or threat to themselves. It goes beyond themselves individually too; to family name, personal social reputation, family estate and fortune, future marriage prospects, shaming their friends with bad company and associations and so on. At minimum, it lumbers others with awkwardness, selfishly. A man’s responsibilities in society forbid dalliance with the underworld elements. It always resurfaces somewhat with the degenerate, sin sticks to them, however they might appear unscathed to shallow people. If everyone ate from the cookie jar, the tragedy of the commons would pretty much provide what we consider a Third World society. It would be unruly and the individuals selfish, feral and uncivilized. We’re well on that course because, since women can’t rein the men in (and some are Satanic, hating men and encouraging their destruction**) then who is supposed to play father to men who shunned that powerful leadership role of their own sex? Men are too PC with one another and standards died as a result. It’s a youth cult that makes them wish they were Peter Pans, never changing or learning or taking on duties, stuck in a hedonic purgatory, like being dutiful is shameful and up is down. The manchild doesn’t rebel so this shift was planned. Where is the honour in such people? Natural slaves.

They don’t have dignity to value themselves beyond a performing phallus, integrity to choose their hobbies and friends wisely, they don’t know the value of hard work (bitching on twitter is not work) nor the satisfaction of being useful to your kin and the relief that duty brings the salt of the earth character.

They assume everyone is jealous of them (projection) because they cannot comprehend how lower impulses can disappear entirely when you realize their illusory nature (best known in Buddhism but Jesus embodies it too).

Most modern men would surrender to Satan in the desert after one hour for a glass of cold water and a shiny car.

No wonder women don’t respect that and ignore it for distractions like career, hoping it’ll go away and they’ll police their own standards in their sex eventually. Like, stop wearing your trousers round your ankles, for one. That’s an easy one. Women by definition cannot play father to a man and guide him like this, playing mother is enabling (and sexually repulsive) and the smarter ones don’t want to encourage it unless they hate men.

Corruption is the rotten apple spoiling the barrel. When it comes to rampant hypersexualization in society, consider the source. Do you think various pajama boys would get away with it, if they didn’t get the biological kick of orgasms as a reward (from porn or a woman in person)? What you reward, you encourage. We encourage indolence, insolence and weakness (this was the intentional product of the ‘Sexual Revolution’ in destroying Western Men). A man loyal to more than one nation is a traitor, what is a man loyal to more than one woman?

…Useless to either, at best. A burden, like an overgrown child.

Like the self-proclaimed family man avoiding his wife and children for a ‘mistress’. I’m sure that doesn’t mess them up at all….

Male power involves as much discernment as the female, for different reasons, throughout all religions. Chastity benefits men in their personal life more than women although it is a virtue for both (power for the male, discernment for the female). Lust is a deadly sin especially for men although modernity has encouraged you to forget this and disturbingly, treat it as the ultimate virtue of a man (to lose himself). They never expressly say what form Satan assumed in the desert to tempt Jesus, I assume female (although the energy of all Devil figures is very destructive and not at all nurturing). I think the #MeToo stuff is triggering the weaker men because it exposes their loss of control which they had believed was cunning concealed from women. Logically, they claim they want tougher punishments on all criminals, including hanging and I’m sure they’d change their tune if it involved their mother/sister/daughter. To personally identify with various types of rapist (including those who target men or boys) shows how weak the modern character is. Everyone gets tempted by things from time to time. So what?

It’s a test, you’re supposed to be strong. These are the defective ‘beautiful ones’ who believe gym gains and sickly cologne make up for their defective and subhuman nature. Metrosexuals don’t survive various societal corrections. Their first impulse on seeing beauty is corruption and degeneracy, much like the rapists they empathize with (instead of their victims like a man with a conscience would).

If you transported them back to the 50s they sexually fantasize about, where the streets were apparently full of young, thin and femininely dressed women, they’d be Ted Bundy. “But they looked really sexy!” level of retarded entitlement. They actually think tease is an insult (women are supposed to look like it) and temptation is an excuse for crime.

Your lust is your business. Picture a fat person blaming cake. Just because you’re triggered doesn’t give you any rights or privileges to get what you want. If so, every time I walk past a jewelry shop and they don’t shower me in diamonds, they must be taunting me. I want it, they’ve got it, what’s the problem? Why can’t I always get what I want? (Women want more from life than men so this is a very good example, nesting instinct means men would still come out with less). It’s just an excuse for anger, popping off like an irritable toddler, it’s the sexual equivalent of road rage. (Ragequitting from women, expressed in hatred of becoming a husband, is actually funny to women – they’re complaining they’d make a bad husband who’d make a bad choice of wife). Mantrums are embarrassing, they’re announcing, proudly how unfit they are. It’s like misogynistic Trigglypuff. They act like women are chasing after them down the street with a veil and false pregnancy positive.

If it’s so bad, get castrated. Honestly, if being horny provokes so much suffering or you are so self-destructive as to hand a rope to a misandrist in fucking one. Chemical castration seems to be a popular option nowadays. They assume women and their hormonal profile don’t feel temptation (HA) and by the time they come to the truth that the problem is them (and not all men) they want to switch back because men get away with more weakness (boys will be boys, weak men turn a blind eye to one another). Eventually they’ll get swept up in a war, probably civil war.

nb *Because Satanism isn’t a religion, it’s anti-religion, it intends to destroy men by encouraging their weakness and worst impulses. Rationalizations are the best way to accomplish this, stupid men are very gullible to any idea that makes them feel strong or impressive, because this way they can delude themselves and appear to have their cake and eat it.

**Remember when the SJWs openly screeched that Trump supporters wouldn’t sleep with them? It’s the witch with the poison apple, come on. It’s the only way they can corrupt and influence men, wasting their energy that could be put toward MAGA and other greatness.

Explaining shit like that.

There’s wasting time, then there’s a Margaret Thatcher colouring book.

Why do they think female rapists exist and the Bible says to avoid seductive women? Whether you think you want them or not, they’re sexual predators. Of course they’ll ruin your life if you let them, that’s what predators do! Stop encouraging them.

This post also clarifies this section of the Bible.

God made femininity and not to have something to shame or corrupt.

Spirit guides, demonic intentions

Something that’s never been human has never been good.

I find it equally dodgy when Christians claim to be talking to angels. Said angels aren’t right in front of them, physically. How does that work?

This is why every Christian should be forced to read about demonology and yes I’m serious, otherwise it leaves them like a sitting duck. A gullible duck wearing a sign saying EAT ME.

Imagine going bird hunting and having no idea what a bird looks like or how it acts. How can you spot something to avoid it if you don’t know what it is?

If you look at the Satanic materials, they summon demons to help them with various tasks and the Solomonic keys describe this perfectly in many ways, by going into detail about what each demon helps with as a specialty. Every time you encounter one of these idiots playing with fire, they claim it cannot be evil because it helps them…. That’s the hook. They help a little while and slowly mislead and deceive and then you’re dependent. It’s evil genius. “Don’t trust something if you can’t see where it keeps its brain” is good advice, whatever Rowling intended.

Satanic books actually warn how tricksy these spirit guides are and how to potentially thwart them and what to never let them do. So by banning Christians from these materials, it’s like throwing a kid into a fire fight when he isn’t allowed a gun. My cynical side says this disarmament is deliberate.

People normally do all that channeling bullshit because they’re hoping something good is out there. Good things have no reason to contact humans. Energy vampires, a New Age term for how demons ‘feed’, live off humans as host and that’s without going into possession cases. Picture Borg.

Even if something good were to contact a human, the “cost” of help would be too heavy on the human, so a good thing would never agree to make the trade (so you cannot sell your soul to an angel).

Think of a human soul like an eternal energy generator and that’s the basic motivation of why a demon or Satan or whatever else in the spirit world would want it. Allegedly. It frees them up by giving them power, via slavery. That connection begins before death, causing the person to be weaker (parasited host) but feel stronger (a temporary ‘gift’ to make them useful conduits, moth to a flame charm brings in yet more victims), while to all the world, they don’t seem to age well or lose something you can’t put your finger on (if you lack discernment).

Humans later made spirits (such as those who sold themselves) don’t really remember their living years anyway because you’re theologically dead a lot, lot longer than you’re alive. Demons know this. Imagine if lending someone a dollar you found on the floor today (something they could get for themselves if they looked) guaranteed you a million dollars every day from tomorrow onward.

The only way to promote atheism and make people do these trades is by making them think the spirit is worthless – because it doesn’t exist. How to do that? Cut them off from the perception of it via hedonism. By being so fully in their body, called the base chakra for a reason, they become numb to spiritual matters and divine truth and conversely, all enlightened people shun hedonism for that reason, they know it pollutes their connections. They can try to be spiritual but a hedonist will only experience it secondhand, cheaply and misinterpreted (as the Ape of Thoth) and as materialism (virtue signalling). They’ll run around in circles following self-improvement fad after fad, bingeing and always hungry like the Asian concept of a hungry ghost, their spirit is empty. They die by self-destruction over years, bringing forward the worst parts of themselves. Self-corruption, truth be told.

Demons feed off the stress of this moral decay. Look into Lord Byron’s life and how he ruined everyone around him. Night Watch had a great scene where the subject of a curse was like a vortex of pain, it made me laugh because it’s true. If you even believe in luck and no gods, it’s true.

The vanity of diet, dress and exercise are the new ‘virtues’.

We live in the Vapid Epoch. People who think of looking good and being evil.

Unable to be openly religious, we observe the rituals with a hollowness bordering on parody, a final blasphemy. We fast and call it “good” but what is good? We may abstain from meat and call it cruel but think nothing of our daily cruelties against our fellow man, our pettiness and spite. We wear fine clothes on spirits of sackcloth. It’s a grandiose lie intended to deprive us of the most vital parts of ourselves and consequently, our lives.

How can people who mock the concept of evil’s reality be anything less?

Don’t let the Devil in with his sweet lies, all religions contain this essential truth.

Give the Devil one lever and he can lift the world. Shiny world, festering underbelly.

Mystical Christianity has a gnosis of its own, it isn’t witchcraft (it’s monotheistic FFS) and you don’t need ‘guides’ other than the Bible. Denial of these inherent elements of the religion will only cause well-intentioned if naive people to turn away and seek false versions like a golden calf.

I write this down, knowing it’ll be mocked by some, because it’s rarely written down, considered obvious by those who already know (such as myself). However there are newly awake people who wish to know like this man so… here.

This has been my candle on the matter, light yours to it or not.

I don’t give a damn. Your soul is your own damned business, chap.

It’s unusual how this is all starting to come out. All cases can’t be true but some cases are hard to deny.

The simplest test is to ask the psychic to view their guide and call on Jesus, with full conviction and while holding a Bible, to show its true face.

Where they’ve had the balls to do it, I’ve never known it go well for them.

Jesus is an enlightened spirit so this shouldn’t harm a positive guide in the same mould, right?

Can psychics be Christian? Prophecy is a gift in the Bible but they don’t need “guides”.

It’s also more of a sudden revelation and considered unpleasant as a spiritual fruit due to the content, which is seldom nice.

The people who try to summon angels are idiots. The point of life is to live and do the hard work yourself. Serving it up on a plate treats you like a child. They say where is my ship coming in and refuse to go to a port. You’ve got trials, pass more of them and you’ll see good results. It isn’t difficult to understand.

There’s your karma, by the way. It can block you and your connections or help you like a river flowing (you’ve seen Donnie Darko, right?)…

Generally, if you feel stuck, there’s something you’re still doing that’s really bad for you and future You can’t exist until you stop it. This is why therapy works as the basic principle. You need to shed the skin, call it Sin or Pain.

I don’t do the Youtube role model thing because I’d be a charismatic leader, I’d be bloody good at it and those are prone to corruption. Same reason I take no money, keeps me honest.

Possible motive and secret history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_de_Rais#Occult_involvement
And that P family link.

“As no demon manifested after three tries, the Marshal grew frustrated with the lack of results. Prelati responded that the demon Barron was angry and required the offering of parts of a child. De Rais provided these remnants in a glass vessel at a future evocation. All of this was to no avail, and the occult experiments left him bitter and with his wealth severely depleted.”

It is a mistake that Americans only look at modern murderers.
It has all the hallmarks – French, rich, using courtly manners (fame, glib charm) to use kids in occult rituals.

“[The boy] was pampered and dressed in better clothes than he had ever known. The evening began with a large meal and heavy drinking, particularly hippocras, which acted as a stimulant. The boy was then taken to an upper room to which only Gilles and his immediate circle were admitted. There he was confronted with the true nature of his situation. The shock thus produced on the boy was an initial source of pleasure for Gilles.”

Why hasn’t there been a film?
This gets very dark, though.
Yet it’s on wikipedia.

Deliberate choice somewhere.

“Poitou further testified that Rais sometimes abused the victims (whether boys or girls) before wounding them and at other times after the victim had been slashed in the throat or decapitated. According to Poitou, Rais disdained the victim’s sexual organs, and took “infinitely more pleasure in debauching himself in this manner … than in using their natural orifice, in the normal manner.”

If that isn’t a sexual sadist.

Yet the DSM refuses to include it (because psychiatric prisons don’t grant easy parole – they may be sick but they aren’t thick).

“very often when the children were dying he sat on their stomachs and took pleasure in seeing them die and laughed”

He doesn’t say where he learned this, implying it was… in the family.
People like that confess what made them like that.
Then confessing would logically spare his relatives from being suspected.

“After Rais admitted to the charges on 21 October,[39] the court canceled a plan to torture him into confessing.”

Shame. Nobody is as frightened of pain as a sadist.

“said to be so lurid that the judges ordered the worst portions to be stricken from the record.”

Thanks, from future historians.

It allows creeps to continue doing this stuff (enables) because nobody believes (appeal to incredulity) it ever happened in history… because where’s the official court record?

“The number of murders is generally placed between 80 and 200; a few have conjectured numbers upwards of 600. The victims ranged in age from six to eighteen and included both sexes, but were predominantly boys.”

One man, really? With power yes, but only one partaking?

Bathory is famous for hardly any, if you look into it.

Considering his MO of preference with boys, who wanted the girls?

For those wondering, boys were easier to get hold of, more gullible (taught men wouldn’t target them that way based on incredulity and a just world fallacy) and less likely to be missed when missing and presumed to have run away. Yes, it’s sexist. Classism is another thing they predate on, e.g. a famous person distracting the other from their gut with that fame or a hungry man offering a poor girl food.

“Writers such as secret-societies specialist Jean-Pierre Bayard, in his book Plaidoyer pour Gilles de Rais, contend he was a victim of the Inquisition.”

French book, eh?

He could have been innocent and conspired against by a cult, he could have been covering for a cult.

Here’s where it gets interesting, I knew this name from books and this is what’s been scratching at my brain hoping I’d remember.

In 1992, Freemason Jean-Yves Goëau-Brissonnière, the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of France, organized a self-proclaimed “court” consisting of former French ministers, parliament members and UNESCO experts to re-examine the source material and evidence available at the medieval trial. A team of lawyers, writers and politicians led by Gilbert Prouteau and presided over by Judge Henri Juramy found him not guilty, although none of the initiators was a medieval historian by profession. In addition, none of them sought professional advice from certified medievalists”

I knew it. A French person first told me about him and how, in France, he’s a semi-mythic figure.

“The hearing, which concluded Gilles de Rais was not guilty of the crimes, was partially turned into a fictionalized biography called Gilles de Rais ou la Gueule du loup, narrated by the writer Gilbert Prouteau. “The case for Gilles de Rais’s innocence is very strong”, Prouteau said. “No child’s corpse was ever found at his castle at Tiffauges and he appears to have confessed to escape excommunication … The accusations appear to be false charges made up by powerful rival lords to benefit from the confiscation of his lands.”[65]

Well, did those lords kill the missing kids/teens then? Begging the Q.

The ol’ jealousy plea, typical of liars.

However, the journalist Gilbert Philippe from the newspaper Ouest-France said that Prouteau was being “facetious and provocative”.[66] He also claimed that Prouteau thought the retrial was basically “an absolute joke”. Historians continue to believe him guilty of the crimes, mainly differing as to his motivation.”

Who writes history again?

I wonder if any famous creeps have a painting of him in their mansion? That would seal it.
Now I’m starting to wonder if his ally Joan of Arc was actually a witch, as was considered at the time. Big if true.

Remember, those who read history, that the French used to use their own ancestor’s fallen soldier skeletons abandoned in fields as fertilizer, literally dig up the bones and grind them down and sell them to make food people eat. French people are weird, English paranoia is just. It isn’t just frogs’ legs.

I remember this Frenchman telling me how, in his research, he found it “odd” that Versailles was founded on a hunting …lodge.

In modern terms, it’s like buying an island. I would look at Versailles’s structure and ownership to look for clues but that would take years.

And why are Mason’s lodges called lodges? It’s a specific hunting term.

The Sun King is chock full of symbolism alone, there are whole books.

It’s like how Caesar might’ve survived if he’d kept it in his toga. The most famous bisexual nobody ever brings up in that context.

Bold move

I saw someone had been filming here and thought Hmmmm…. let’s look up what’s in their gift shop.

https://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/lamassu-winged-bull-necklace.html

I sense a theme.
https://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/silver-bull-s-head-necklace.html

Woman’s intuition. Anything prefaced with “mystery” is a cult, the religious equivalent of a Pyramid scheme.

https://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/butterfly-necklace-with-brooch-british-museum-exclusive.html

Ishtar energy and sexual ruin

Roughly speaking, something to bear in mind.

As for married couples, I’ve noticed a process.

Madonna/Whore comes from the male inability to reconcile the woman he loves with the woman he fucks. They view the wife like a replacement mother and feel disgust or rejection of their desire projected onto the wife, especially if she’s dutiful – they see her fussing over the business of the home and childcare. They disgracefully think lust and love are meant to be separate and always kept separate (this stupid false belief literally causes men health problems inc. impotence and it’s also why they marry sluts). It’s like they think they’re corrupting her with their conjugal rights. It becomes a serious turn-off, like she’s tainted or impure for desiring him (repulsed by her lust) or it isn’t “safe” to sexually express – with their SPOUSE. Husbands CANNOT repress their sexuality and basically rob their wives of that cherishing experience. It ruins marriages, sex is the glue that holds marriage together and while ebbs and flows are normal, either depriving the other, while bad, isn’t as bad as seeking it outside the union (always adultery). That’s a divorce category because it ruins the union, spoils the trust, the connection itself is divorced between the parties. No splitting or the woman senses this and retreats, in passive femininity and trust (how women solve problems), assuming he needs his own space, he’ll come back soon and then he feels abandoned when actually, she’s waiting for him to be the Man first. Because he is. A wife is the most sexual woman. It’s the total experience including fertility, modern men fear the completion of the cycle is the “wrong” thing but actually it’s postmodern sterile sex that’s incomplete* sexuality (and likely causes most of the psychiatric issues associated with promiscuity). Men experience the fulfillment of their sexuality when they become a father, this is why their hormones change for about a year after the wife gives birth!**

Husbands also stop flirting with their wife in modern times, a fact I am certain is a divorce risk… like, no? Why would you think that’s a good idea? The Bible says if you don’t get everything at home you’ll be tempted outside it. Flirt with your damn wife, women are verbal creatures! Women need that verbal affirmation, or society will replace it. Missionary work, crash dieting, various passive-aggressive unconscious punishments that take her energy outside the union and onto worldly things (so not cheating but damn close and it seriously raises the odds she’d escalate to that).

Women get (passive) the verbal (flirting) then men get the physical (sex).

It’s a very simple process and I have to keep explaining this to people. This is old common knowledge. Usually there’s nothing actually “wrong” in the initial stages of marital “problems”, they just don’t flirt! It doesn’t occur to them!!

It isn’t something you do for courting or that kids do.

It’s verbal glue.

You have fewer arguments. Seriously. This is so simple so a therapist (if they know) will NEVER EVER tell you because it’s FREE. Free puts them out of a job.

A husband who wants his wife to be less sexual shouldn’t have married her, frankly. And he can’t expect her to degrade herself, (stares at America) sexuality isn’t doing everything, that’s a sign of a problem where the lust is covering it. There isn’t any shame in marital sex, American Christians need this hammered into their skulls. It isn’t dirty if you’re married. Sex is marriage glue. Repeat this until you know it in your bones.

*Imagine you kept eating and eating and eating food but were never satisfied and actually got more frustrated. Congratulations, sexually, that’s hook-up culture. Nobody says this because they don’t want to offend the single or infertile but sorry, that’s evolution. It’s like saying we need air to breathe, it could offend people with breathing problems but so what? Doesn’t change the fact.

Ancient times measured sexual encounters as satisfactory based on whether or not they were “fruitful”. They knew. Those were incredibly patriarchal societies, well, this is the kernel of truth behind all patriarchy.

You don’t see the father of five wishing he had two.

It’s also why broody men in our culture are shamed as patriarchal.

**And miscarriage or infertility can provoke divorce. In biological terms, you fall in love for two years to conceive and then the parental bond is the heightened connection, the sight of proven fertility, parental oxytocin from interactions. I wonder if childless marriages (by choice) are also a divorce risk, I’d assume so since it replicates infertility.

Random but I wonder if a Roe v Wade repeal would include the Pill abortifacient? Biologically, it must. It’s a chronic Morning After pill, another chemical abortion. Both are given to minors, more grounds.

What is Europa doing on the Arkansas seal?

The crown of stars is Europa. It is also on the “EU” flag.

Sword of Justice and no scales?

Clutch of arrows and no bow?

The upper woman is like a cross between Europa and Britannia.

That doesn’t make sense at all. And what’s with all the rays like Apollo?

12 bundles of rays look like a zodiac.

What’s she holding? Spear is Mars. Logically it should be a trident.

Pure speculation but the only blue-winged angels I’ve seen were distinctly French.

Hidden in plain sight.