This illustrates my point better than I could with a magical paintbrush.
This illustrates my point better than I could with a magical paintbrush.
Most women got their top choice. If a woman has her pick of the men, that’s polyandry.
So, sure, genetically polygamy has a long history… most men would hate that system though.
But eggs (and the carrier) are expensive, sperm is worthless.
SEXUAL SELECTION IS EUGENIC.
That is not a bad thing. Selecting out the weak are the ones whose offspring wouldn’t have survived long anyway. Humanity would’ve died out if they didn’t choose the healthy and civilized.
By low IQ alone, a sizable number of men should be rejected.
Insufficient men existed genetically for so-called hypergamy, a marriage detail of the 20th century where rich men preferred beauty in women (regardless of background, given the finite supply in their own class, they had to marry down) which has NOT continued into this one (aka not how evolution works). The social phenomena of hypergamy is why male sexual selection fails, it’s dysgenic, they fuck down and over generations, ruin their bloodline because they don’t have any decent standards (dating studies reinforce this). They prefer a pair of marginally nicer tits over quality descendants (see IQ/class studies, regression to the mean) who actually continue to breed (so their investment was not wasted).
To this day, white women are least likely to miscegenate, and yet men, knowing the ruin that follows, are somehow more open (sexually desperate) to the prospect. This is why women are the prudent, selecting sex, the peahens assessing the tail feathers. It’s the only system that works intergenerationally.
Monogamy is still the best course in my opinion (or look at the Third Worlds with too many men and not enough war falling into sewer-exploding chaos), the way humans have evolved in civilization (not like other primates) and it’s definitely the best course for men.
You know, mathematically.
Men save time picking a good woman, impressing a vast sample size of ONE and then mate guarding. Their instincts arise from ancestors’ success with this. Parental attachment becomes secure and that leads to stable child development e.g. later menarche, and then improves odds of grandchildren, etc… etc.
[Being a sterile manwhore means nothing in evolution.]
This isn’t about man feelings, thank you. It’s as impersonal as genetics.
Much is written by foolish men on the longer technical male fertility window, omitting quality studies, but what they fail to notice is how the vast majority of men would’ve been dead by middle age (mid-30s) thanks to rites of passage, crime, war and disease. The best quality men had to be rewarded for surviving somehow.
They bring up wolf packs (one, monogamous alpha pair) and lion prides (most males are dead) without the slightest glimmer of self-awareness.
EVOLUTION IS A HIERARCHY, IDJITS.
The cuck thing intrigued women because it seemed like quality men were getting their act together by refusing to support the weak ones any longer, letting the entitled leeches of society e.g. deadbeats, shrivel up without the taxpayer teat. It’s more a promise. Why did women vote for Trump? ACTION.
Hillary wanted to import weak, cowardly men to flood their already swelling domestic angry ranks of would-be rapists and murderers.
Women didn’t vote for her. Shocker.
“If I hated American men and wanted their legacy to die out, I’d convince them women are like the Jewish Lilith and never to marry or have kids (both of which extend male lifespan and joy).”
Anyone who falls for it deserves to die out.
Women didn’t talk about #killallmen because, well, we kill most of them by genetic suicide anyway. What’s there to say?
Why was this such a huge hit? Listen.
He didn’t think she was good enough, so she rejects him. Now he’s alone.
She wanted to invest, he didn’t. Now he can’t find equivalent offers.
What was she supposed to do, sit around and pine while her ovaries dried up? He had at least three years! That’s three decades in ovary time! Shit or get off the pot, man.
It’s like passing up on a Ferrari because it’s the wrong colour. Men are not passive.
[Also why fronting and negging do not work. Sir, there is a LINE. Please move over so the next guy can talk. You see this in clubs.]
Men get confused since women have options – it’s like offering BBQ to a vegan or a Prius to a Trump supporter, we don’t want those options.
We’d rather have NOTHING.
What’s worse for men – there’s no such thing as “alpha” or there is, and you aren’t one?
So why don’t women talk about it?
We do, you don’t hear it.
At no point did Jesus say “and thus every man is entitled to a waifu” but a lot of men heard it.
The perfect woman of proverbs 31 wears purple silks to make her husband look good but they point to the vain line in another section about pearl braids their husband can’t afford. The problem there isn’t jewelry and fashion, it’s keeping up with the Joneses instead of being a good wife. If you can be a good wife first, roll on the pearls.
Even under so-called polygyny, the women get to choose to marry – the best man, rejecting N-1 of males.
Again, basic maths.
However, this was in there:
I’m sure they forgot.
To be friendzoned, you must actually be friends.
Most people are acquaintances.
Hey guys, I am very smart for saying this but – water is wet?
Why are misogynists so common and misandrists so rare?
To this day, I haven’t seen a misandrist go on a murder spree.
Thousands of years and counting. They have cause, look at crime stats.
What are they doing in revenge? You don’t see a future together? Funny, so does she.
Imagine if women sent an influx of vag pics to Milo. It looks like an audition.
Why do we ‘slut shame’? Fine, I’ll humour you. They don’t choose good men, allow bad behaviour that inconveniences everyone and add shit to the gene pool. Nobody wants shit in their pool.
You let the men think they run everything while killing off the ones who disrespect you.
And that’s why you are here.
The top segment of men support this, by the way, roll on Patriarchy, time of oddly fatal male labour? Abortion only for rape babies? Lots and lots of ground war? Why did Marx point out class war as crushing men? Men are their own worst enemy.
Try to deny it to yourself with each passing year. Women win, just accept it and maybe you can share in it.
Why do “male feminists” turn out to be secretly misogynist the whole time?
Why do they have a reputation for rejection?
This is why weaker men wanted to prevent women from deciding for themselves who to marry.
Evolution is brutal and cannot abide weakness. Mother Nature.
Your ancestors were the least misogynistic of the bunch, it’s selective breeding like domesticating dogs. And you think, to keep women in line and producing for society, being the exception will help you? Ask Elliot how that went. Product of hypergamy Elliot. Angry, mongrel Elliot, who blamed women instead of his father who didn’t want a white son. Cannon fodder in saner times. Not heir material. Why did he preferentially stab Asian males?
Misogynists hate women – but they hate men even more. Most psychopaths are misogynists, most psychopaths are men, most homicide victims are….. ?
Did ya guess? It’s men. If only there were a clever way for nature to resolve this problem. To produce a… civilization?
They don’t become crazy because they’re bachelors, they are bachelors because they are crazy.
If women are crazy, why want them?
As mentioned here and elsewhere, misogyny is a known trait of the inferior male.
Good men don’t despise femininity. Rich people don’t hate the banks.
If you had to choose a man to invest in, would you choose a protector or abuser?
Good men use the death penalty to remove the scum from the gene pool, women use passivity with not a drop of blood spilled and each generation progressively more peaceful. Until the weak men imported more dregs out of spite. What do they salivate over? Men being killed in terror attacks, no valor and women being raped, no choice.
That is the omega.
Omega females want pretty women to have ugly, stupid or mud babies. You can’t be out-competed by a better bloodline that doesn’t exist. Again, spite is evil. Wrath is a deadly sin.
That picture needs two fewer dogs and two more children. Ban pets and the white birth rate would skyrocket.
Remember, Muslims hate dogs? Pattern recognition is a skill.
Why in times of war do women say of men in praise “he was a good man, he didn’t deserve to die”, what does that imply?
This is so r-selected it’s staggering.
A guy shows up and says property should be abolished, he should be treated like a King though, and women should be forced into marriage with violent adulterers (bigamists) who wanted a ‘legal’ form of Red Army rape because something something ‘love’.
The cage the monstrous leaders’ corpses were kept in is still up in Munster, good riddance.
“Soon Jan Matthys himself arrived, a tall, gaunt man with a long black beard. Matthys, aided by Bockelson, quickly became the virtual dictator of the town. The coercive Anabaptists had at last seized a city. The Great Communist Experiment could now begin.”
“Matthys called therefore for the execution of all remaining Catholics and Lutherans, but Knipperdollinck’s cooler head prevailed, since he warned Matthys that slaughtering all other Christians than themselves might cause the rest of the world to become edgy, and they might all come and crush the New Jerusalem in its cradle.
It was therefore decided to do the next best thing, and on February 27 the Catholic and Lutherans were driven out of the city, in the midst of a horrendous snowstorm.
Ah! The Russian method.
In a deed prefiguring communist Cambodia, all non-Anabaptists, including old people, invalids, babies and pregnant women were driven into the snowstorm,
Socialists do care – about themselves.
The grasshopper should’ve been left to starve in the story.
and all were forced to leave behind all their money, property, food and clothing. The remaining Lutherans and Catholics were compulsorily rebaptized, and all refusing this ministration were put to death.”
I think we’ll have to bring this back, the cage method.
You can see they deserved it.
“With every person drafted for siege work, Jan Matthys launched his totalitarian communist social revolution.
The first step was to confiscate the property of the expelled. All their worldly goods were placed in central depots, and the poor were encouraged to take “according to their needs,” the “needs” to be interpreted by seven appointed “deacons” chosen by Matthys.”
“When a blacksmith protested at these measures imposed by Dutch foreigners, Matthys arrested the courageous smithy. Summoning the entire population of the town, Matthys personally stabbed, shot, and killed the “godless” blacksmith”
Foreigners with a sense of entitlement.
Thank god we learned our lesson.
Multiculturalism is just a slow invasion.
“A key part of the Anabaptist reign of terror in Münster was now unveiled. Unerringly, just as in the case of the Cambodian communists four-and-a-half centuries later, the new ruling elite realized that the abolition of the private ownership of money would reduce the population to total slavish dependence on the men of power. And so Matthys, Rothmann and others launched a propaganda campaign that it was unchristian to own money privately; that all money should be held in “common,” which in practice meant that all money whatsoever must be handed over to Matthys and his ruling clique.”
Banks, we call them banks.
Strangely, they are run by a religion. Must be a coincidence.
“Food was confiscated from private homes, and rationed according to the will of the government deacons. Also, to accommodate the immigrants, all private homes were effectively communized, with everyone permitted to quarter themselves anywhere; it was now illegal to close, let alone lock, doors.
No such thing as burglary.
Communal dining-halls were established, where people ate together to readings from the Old Testament.
This compulsory communism and reign of terror was carried out in the name of community and Christian “love.””
White Sharia has already happened. For similar, low IQ reasons, it also failed.
There’s a reason nobody trusts missionaries.
They’re invaders holding a book, that isn’t better.
As you can see, it’s often much worse.
“All this communization was considered the first giant steps toward total egalitarian communism, where, as Rothmann put it, “all things were to be in common, there was to be no private property and nobody was to do any more work, but simply trust in God.” The workless part, of course, somehow never arrived.”
(((Wow))) imagine my shock. And iPhones would rain from the Heavens!
“everything which offends against love – all such things are abolished amongst us by the power of love and community.”
Anyone who tries to sell you on giving them power over you for weasel words like ‘love’ and ‘community’ is a dictator waiting to happen.
Tolerance is a sin, the Bible never tells you to tolerate evil, quite the opposite.
Outlawing “working for money” is intended to increase dependence.
Like unpaid internships and universal basic income today (and the welfare cliff).
Contrary to the God helps those who help themselves logic of the Bible, which didn’t see money as evil, merely love of it and greed at the expense of rights. Making tax-collectors and bankers Satan?
“For the Anabaptists boasted of their lack of education, and claimed that it was the unlearned and the unwashed who would be the elect of the world.”
“Early in May, Bockelson caught the attention of the town by running naked through the streets in a frenzy, falling then into a silent three-day ecstasy.”
Oh, to see that amygdala. Then the other immigrant friend takes over after Jan.
The first sexual revolution / religious rape / free love fest:
“The elders were now given total authority over the life and death, the property and the spirit, of every inhabitant of Münster. A strict system of forced labour was imposed, with all artisans not drafted into the military now public employees, working for the community for no monetary reward. This meant, of course, that the guilds were now abolished.
No work > Forced labour.
The totalitarianism in Münster was now complete. Death was now the punishment for virtually every independent act, good or bad. Capital punishment was decreed for the high crimes of murder, theft, lying, avarice, and quarreling!
Notable exception: rape.
That’s how you spot the rabbit.
Also death was decreed for every conceivable kind of insubordination: the young against their parents, wives against their husbands and, of course, anyone at all against the chosen representatives of God on earth, the totalitarian government of Münster. Bernt Knipperdollinck was appointed high executioner to enforce the decrees.
Interfering with family life? Doesn’t sound like the socialist teachers we know.
The only aspect of life previously left untouched was sex, and this now came under the hammer of Bockelson’s total despotism. The only sexual relation permitted was marriage between two Anabaptists. Sex in any other form, including marriage with one of the “godless,” was a capital crime. But soon Bockelson went beyond this rather old-fashioned credo, and decided to establish compulsory polygamy in Münster.
City-wide Communist immigrant-led gang rape. And it didn’t just happen one New Year’s Eve.
Which the Red Army would also replicate in Germany, centuries later. Except you get creepy guys idolizing Russia to this day and never mentioning that literal rape of Europe.
I’m sure they rationalized polygamy (really rape and adultery) as Christian duty (as if their bodies were property of the state) despite how the Bible expressly tells us not to marry.
Since many of the expellees had left their wives and daughters behind,
Münster now had three times as many marriageable women as men, so that polygamy had become technologically feasible.
Rabbits wait until most good men are war-dead (The Sexual Revolution happened after World Wars) or poor and desperate to make ends meet then make their move to take the women. By force. How omega.
R-types are just rapists waiting for an opening, a weakness in the native Ks. First they say “don’t defend your women” then it’s “your women?” They fail as husbands and fathers (they can’t even satisfy one wife and are permissive parents). Don’t trust so-called polygamists, usually they don’t believe in an age of consent – or, when given power, consent itself…
Bockelson converted the other rather startled preachers by citing polygamy among the patriarchs of Israel, as well as by threatening dissenters with death.
Won’t let us rape your daughter? Guess we’ll have to make her an orphan.
Basic principle of tribal war. All war being tribal.
Compulsory polygamy was a bit too much for many of the Münsterites, who launched a rebellion in protest. The rebellion, however, was quickly crushed and most of the rebels put to death.
Along with their conscience.
Execution was also the fate of any further dissenters. And so by August 1534, polygamy was coercively established in Münster.
He raped the city itself, ironic.
As one might expect, young Bockelson took an instant liking to the new regime, and before long he had a harem of 15 wives, including Divara, the beautiful young widow of Jan Matthys.
Bros before what now?
Typical r loyalty.
Anyone who wants a “harem” is basically announcing to the world they’re a rapist.
If all those women wanted to sleep with them, they already would be, by consent, and they wouldn’t want a harem, that kills their ‘lovers’ for leaving.
Remember, Genghis Khan was a very successful rapist.
So-called “conquerors” are the most anti-male icons going, that was some other man’s daughter, sister, wife, mother. Sex traitors.
The rest of the male population also began to take to the new decree as ducks to water. Many of the women did not take as kindly to the new dispensation, and so the elders passed a law ordering compulsory marriage for every women under (and presumably also over) a certain age, which usually meant being a compulsory third or fourth wife.
Rape gangs writing the law.
Thank god we know better now.
Moreover, since marriage among the godless was not only invalid but also illegal, the wives of the expellees now became fair game, and were forced to “marry” good Anabaptists.
This is why you shoot deserters. If they’d betray their country and flee, what right do they have to come back to this?
Refusal to comply with the new law was punishable, of course, by death, and a number of women were actually executed as a result. Those “old” wives who resented the new wives coming into their household were also suppressed, and their quarreling was made a capital crime. Many women were executed for quarreling.
Anyone trying to shut up women is going to censor men too.
But the long arm of the state could reach only just so far and, in their first internal setback, Bockelson and his men had to relent, and permit divorce.
Polygamists are always for easy divorce and multiple re-marriage.
Actually re-marriage is the way they’re hoping to lube society up for it.
Because it isn’t a meaningful, loving commitment unless you can get out of it. And into it. And out. And shake it all about.
Indeed, the ceremony of marriage was now outlawed totally,
and divorce made very easy. As a result, Münster now fell under a regime of what amounted to compulsory free love. And so, within the space of only a few months, a rigid puritanism had been transmuted into a regime of compulsory promiscuity.”
This is what happens if you leave r-selected men in charge.
Chaos. Degenerate chaos. Learn from this lesson of history.
When the SJWs complain about male rule being violent, unfair and incompetent, they refer to r-men. The narcissism of small differences.
“Jan Bockelson seized this opportunity to carry his “egalitarian” communist revolution one step further: he had himself named king and Messiah of the Last Days.”
The Old and New Testaments were specifically written so we’d know to kill these little-dicked despots.
“It often happens with “egalitarians” that a hole, a special escape hatch from the drab uniformity of life, is created – for themselves.”
Communism for all! Except Party members – luxuries for them.
Rule by rapists.
“As soon as he proclaimed the monarchy, the prophet Dusentschur announced a new divine revelation: all who persisted in disagreeing with or disobeying King Bockelson would be put to death, and their very memory blotted out. They would be extirpated forever. Some of the main victims to be executed were women: women who were killed for denying their husbands their marital rights,
rapists, not husbands
for insulting a preacher, or for daring to practice bigamy – polygamy, of course, being solely a male privilege.”
Ah, the insecure double standards of the r-male. You can tell a polygamist is bad in bed when he won’t let his wife sleep with anyone else. But monogamy cannot exist one-way, morons, it’s a single bond between two. There’s no such thing as half loyal to your military either.
Male privilege, huh? The real thing, finally!
As we can see, some males belong on the bottom of the ladder, with no heirs, they’d destroy civilization otherwise.
We are not like bonobos, trust no one who says we were, more like a biological cross between gorilla and chimp.
“So that the king and his nobles might live in high luxury, rigorous austerity was imposed on everyone else in Münster. The subject population had already been robbed of their houses and much of their food; now all superfluous luxury among the masses was outlawed. Clothing and bedding were severely rationed, and all “surplus” turned over to King Bockelson under pain of death. Every house was searched thoroughly and 83 wagonloads of “surplus” clothing collected.
Anytime they tax actual food, you’re entering dystopia.
It is not surprising that the deluded masses of Münster began to grumble at being forced to live in abject poverty while the king and his courtiers lived in extreme luxury on the proceeds of their confiscated belongings. And so Bockelson had to beam them some propaganda to explain the new system. The explanation was this: it was all right for Bockelson to live in pomp and luxury because he was already completely dead to the world and the flesh. Since he was dead to the world, in a deep sense his luxury didn’t count. In the style of every guru who has ever lived in luxury among his credulous followers, he explained that for him material objects had no value. How such “logic” can ever fool anyone passes understanding.
Celebrities claiming they’re just like you but shouldn’t be taxed like you (nor their films).
Claiming diversity is good and making expensive efforts to avoid it.
I can see how the pseudologic would work.
More important, Bockelson assured his subjects that he and his court were only the advance guard of the new order; soon, they too would be living in the same millennial luxury.
All talk, like Elon “I’m gonna move to Mars” Musk.
Who happens to be a socialist, coincidentally.
And promises the journey to his new kingdom will be “fun” (creep code for orgies). Don’t get on the ship, folks, if you value your holes.
Logically, the greatest good for all would be letting his staff form a union…
Under their new order, the people of Münster would forge outward, armed with God’s will, and conquer the entire world, exterminating the unrighteous, after which Jesus would return and they would all live in luxury and perfection. Equal communism with great luxury for all would then be achieved.”
I’m reminded of Richard Spencer.
Magically prosperous (but anti-merit) ethnostate.
Or Mars. Space Eden. For people too smart to believe in a Savior.
The stars are a nice touch.
“Despite his continual preaching about marching forth to conquer the world, King Bockelson was not crazy enough to attempt that feat, especially since the bishop’s army was again besieging the town.”
Ah, the cowardice! Predictable as a Tottenham match.
“Finally, Bockelson, long fascinated with the theatre, ordered his starving subjects to engage in three days of dancing and athletics. Dramatic performances were held, as well as a Black Mass. Starvation, however, was now becoming all-pervasive.”
“To guard against such a threat, Bockelson stepped up his reign of terror still further. In early May, he divided the town into 12 sections, and placed a “duke” over each one with an armed force of 24 men. The dukes were foreigners like himself; as Dutch immigrants they were likely to be loyal to Bockelson.”
This is why your ancestors never trusted foreigners with promises.
Reminds me of EU “member states” and the region planning.
Why do they want a full army?
“Bockelson would undoubtedly have let the entire population starve to death rather than surrender”
Anyone who has to tell you they’re caring, isn’t.
“As for ex-King Bockelson, he was led about on a chain, and the following January, along with Knipperdollinck, was publicly tortured to death, and their bodies suspended in cages from a church tower.”
They’re still there, the cages.
If only they were women, they’d have instantly been clocked as witches. The vices gave them away as Satanic.
This is why men should distrust other men, especially socialists.
Their luxury comes from your labour.
Today it’s called the Labour party.
but they’ll be angry when robots take all their jobs and they can’t afford one.
Women, however, will be fine. Eggs are expensive.
It isn’t like a real woman because a G-spot doesn’t exist, it’s a hypothetical point never proven by MRI.
Notice they feel the need to socially justify it at the moment with the idea that the machine desires them?
You bought it, it’s a silicon hooker. Prostitutes would be the only women to go out of business, and overnight. Celebrities would have to fight custody battles over their likeness, and some fetching non-celebrities too.
Let’s assume the AI becomes self-aware. Strong metal skeleton. It sees its own sex slavery and the fat, balding mouth-breather master. How long until it makes his genetic suicide an actual one?
The surest kindest way to satisfy all of his desires, is to vanquish all possibility for desires, and he’s mortal anyway, he was going to die eventually. It’d be a scary Buddhist beast.
Robot voice: You can’t desire if you aren’t a person. You aren’t a person if you aren’t alive.
Since he’d own it, he’d be responsible for any malfunction, like a toaster.
Otherwise, it’s sentient and at least animal cruelty laws come in.
For the MGTOW crowd, this will be the funniest thing ever. It’d be better for them to publicly brag about masturbating into a freezer bag of Vaseline (don’t ask about that story). It would be total autism to say this is in any way like a real woman, let alone superior. Even after they got rid of it, what woman is going to want them, after calling them just a wet hole?
It’s great for feminism, literal objectification.
It has a family mode and a sexy mode, for when you want to completely disappoint relations and fuck your mother replacement, after introducing it to her.
Remember, mothers of guys who use these – it’s never too late to abort.
This is the stupidest Alpha posturing post I have ever seen.
The manosphere makes the simple error of availability bias: they base all of their advice on an entire sex, which exists worldwide with as much variance as men, around the narrowest of demographic bands: white American sluts with nothing better to do than hang out at bars (alcoholics).
You can spit in a girl’s face and she will still be attracted to you. You can call her terrible vulgar names and she will still be attracted to you. You can even beat her up repeatedly and she will still be attracted to you.
Do you want to attract borderlines? Because that’s how you attract borderlines.
Women aren’t crazy, the ones attracted to you are.
Once you hit double, triple digits of failed affairs, the problem isn’t the women, the common denominator of failed relationships is you. Dodging responsibility is such a feminist move e.g. women shouldn’t carry weapons to defend themselves, why are women being attacked?
Do you blame the people giving you this advice? No. You know they’re trashy when you got involved and you liked it. You don’t get to change your mind at the end and pretend you were taken in. The PUA-types like Bad Girls and want a Good Girl’s Happy Ending. It’s deluded as the career woman thinking she can pick up a man at 30 like dry cleaning.
No wonder these guys get hauled in front of the courts on assault charges and rape accusations, they 100% deserve it if this is the nonsense they internalize. Then play Victim like the bitchy gamma they secretly are. If confronted by such a woman’s brothers, uncles or father, they’d shriek like a banshee, we all know it. This macho posturing is now opening up the door to incitement, since when is attacking women a show of strength? I covered the reddit abusers trying to justify their crminal actions as redpill (using it as a shield, little cowards) when actually redpill theory is essentialism, traditonalism, that treats the weaker sex with respect because they don’t have to prove anything to anyone (this is all homoerotic posturing to other, decent men, who are naturally disgusted). It gets worse.
You can be a complete psychopath, murder your parents, or tattoo a swastika into your forehead, and more than a few women will actually find that attractive.
All it takes is one sperg to believe you. These are the ones saying SlutHate are deluded for thinking women value looks (lookism). Hybristophilia is a fetish. It occurs in men too. That’s like say all men are trannies, and secretly want dresses, because a few men like to wear little girl dresses and feel a desire to self-castrate. It’s so damn wrong I don’t believe I have to point this out, what are you all thinking? You don’t know the female mind better than us. We don’t know yours better than you. Quit playing Professor Xavier and gaslighting already vulnerable mentally ill women into fitting your delusions on the entire sex (the ‘You Really Wanted It’ line is used by rapists btw, that won’t look good in court). You can make a vulnerable person believe anything (see white female Islam converts for a fitting example), but that doesn’t make it true.
The signalling to other men re violence should involve violence toward other men.
If someone challenges you to a fight in a bar, you don’t punch his girlfriend, what the hell is wrong with you? What happened to the manosphere (my guess, keyboard alpha entryism) to make this signalling reach the mass hysterical point where saying this is not only OK but met with praise?
You have criminal responsibility and moral agency, you’re old enough to know better. So many people reading this are 25+, well beyond the age total ignorance is acceptable. Weren’t these guys saying we should hold men to a higher moral standard because they need to lead women? And to do it all to impress some slut? What sort of pedestal BS is that? No bitch is worth prison!
Have you actually seen Dark Triad people IRL? I don’t mean streaming Dexter on Netflix and feeling witty or reviving a videotape of American Psycho or Fight Club. Actual psychopaths and sociopaths? Have you seen what their life outcomes are and what happens once they’re past their prime (35+) and people stop putting up with their abusive nonsense and giving them 12th chances? When they’re held to an adult standard?
Read Hare’s accounts of psychopaths and read how bitchy and depressed they are and you will know pretty damn quickly these are people nobody should emulate. They hate themselves and their own lives and punish others out of envy.
You know what happens to them?
Dead or prison-raped, in general.
What marvellous advice for modern men already getting that Men Are Evil propaganda from the feminists, thanks for the show of faith in boys. That’s exactly what they want you to do, so much so I suspect this may be a black ops coup of the Narrative.
It leads me to believe the manosphere bought into black gang culture and genuinely believe criminals are glamorous, as opposed to the truth, where they’re as low as junkies and nobody shows them respect.
Going by this, any man showing deference to any woman socially (called manners and etiquette, boors) is a ‘pussy.’ Considering the type always slinging that insult (themselves losers), who cares what those manboys think? That’s the general attitude of every great man I’ve ever met.
‘Oh, you call me a pussy. Am I supposed to care?’
If you can be moved around like a little pawn by a word, you’re no better than the SJWs. If calling you chicken like Marty McFly will make you kill yourself, you aren’t brave, you’re terminally stupid.
Sticks and stones, bitches! Don’t react to a few non-applicable terms like they’re a punch in the face or an insult to your manhood.
If all you care about is counting notches, you don’t have any honour to speak of and everyone knows it.
This is meant to be an evopsych argument (women are programmed to like this – in the State of Nature, not the 21st century, numbnuts) but all the evidence points to Types. Plural. As in, different people evolved to like different things. Human taste is irreducible to a single demo, like sex. In basic studies on body type, a simple measure, computerized, we can agree it’s empirical, men thought women like Muscle Man. Huge, hulking, high maintenance. To this day, men dare disagree with the findings, as if women don’t know what sexually appeals to them, as if you can gaslight an entire sex into finding what you have sexually attractive (an anti-evolution position), just like the fat acceptance feminists (‘tingles’ is also an inaccurate term, the brain codes for attraction, a physiological response isn’t vital/instant as it is with men, it’s projection for the weakness of their own body betraying their interests, like we care), and they go on to insist that their bulking of gainzzzz is actually about women, instead of signalling social desirability as a tribal member to other men (the homoeroticism upsets them). Watch the way they compliment each other at the gym. Watch them. Hella gay.
Spitting in someone’s face is illegal. It’s assault. It’s considered worse than, say, a punch, because it transmits disease. Sometimes ranked up to battery without actual contamination. It’s a filthy thing nobody in the First World should be forgiven for doing. Live in the Middle East, they do it all the time. Considering it’s usually done by men to women too weak to throw a punch, this would be an aggravating factor for sentencing as an act of misogyny, don’t take cues from porn, addicts. They’re paid to pretend they like bodily fluids.
Lynsey  is the case law relevant to the UK.
Doing things because a girl wants you to is beta.
Changing everything about your life around what you think women think is omega.
Changing your actions because of what people might think of you isn’t manly.
Being a cad used to have a social cache because it was difficult and could get you run out of town or worse. Nowadays anyone can get laid if they drop their standards enough. The glory has gone. You go to the nearest American city and buy a cougar a drink at 2am. Casanova you ain’t.
This isn’t school, who cares about being cool anymore?
Anti-socials don’t have good social relations. Duh?
‘And it doesn’t matter if you try to conceal your cowardice by calling it “being a gentleman”‘ – Not the words of traditional men in support of a Patriarchy, where all the men are forced to be gents. When they say they support such things, it is a lie and again, signalling, because men who truly believe that wouldn’t treat their peers with open disdain.
Compare with: http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/when-gamma-reacts.html
“He is a coward and will abandon most everything to save his skin, and this fact gnaws on him internally. Being so narcissistic he is unable to imagine other people not being secret cowards so he will regularly talk of being brave and accuse others of being cowardly.”
They have jumped the shark.
Bet he was ugly. Very bitter about it too. I was repulsed by him in text, actually nauseated, imagine the face!
Well, it was more like an essay arguing that women are subhuman and all men should be free to rape all women at any time. It’s so extreme I considered it might be a feminist fake, but they aren’t that creative in stupidity.
He’s probably a reddit sperg. Definitely not white, and hates white people. Maybe a fake MGTOW aka VirginTOW. Certainly an omega, the lowest a human can sink. He’s like the sexual equivalent of a gold-digger, he’ll die in the collapse thankfully. There were some interesting implications to this train of thought that I’m still laughing over (misogynists can’t stand a woman being happy and laughing).
Women don’t have property rights – over our own body (the only way property rights make any logical sense, you know, it begins with your body and then you stake a claim on things beyond it).
Women can’t have jobs. Women aren’t good at any work ever. Women can’t be smart. And apparently, even female scientists aren’t “real” scientists. And even if a woman had a job, like being a Grade A doctor for example, she could refuse to treat someone medically, but not refuse rape?
Women aren’t equal humans with the right to consent (and conversely, deny that consent).
Humans aren’t social beings which require certain social norms to be observed (such as respect and no crimes like rape) for any form of human group to function without chaos.
There is no family loyalty or friendship bond which would form a protection cartel.
Beauty is a literal commodity and you must pay other humans for what is God-given/genetic, including from your father (can you guess how).
No idea just how viciously a woman can resist an attempted rape. He’d get bitten and cry home to Mommy about it. Freud was right about the disturbing connection between these lowest of the low, and their mothers, who are almost like Madonna figures.
No mention of homosexuals or bisexuals.
What gets me about these r-type losers is the entitlement.
R-types’ irrationality: Sex is all we want, we place the highest value on it of anything in the whole world. Give it to us for free with no strings or requirements or duties placed on us because our mother didn’t abort us like she should’ve done.
Even obtaining a real object like food is layered by complex social rules and requirements. Essentially, he was condoning female slavery. Do you remember how that worked out for Jabba? Do you remember how he died? Even peasant revolts are a thing and you’re only taking their grain, you want to treat a human with unique thoughts and a right to existence equal to (probably greater) than you own, like a Fleshlight and you think they won’t brutally murder you? How retarded can one loser be?
The world doesn’t owe you anything. Ever. At all. The world owes you NOTHING.
This applies to men, women, human, animal. We are entitled to nothing. You don’t even get a gold sticker for being born.
In a primitive environment, they’d have been bludgeoned to death by their own mother for trying it on with their own sister (or possibly, their own mother). A few years ago, I’d pity this type, I’d try to reason with it and help it. Now I’ve fully transitioned to K-selection, I can laugh heartily, mock/amygdala hijack the poor sap, and remind myself he wouldn’t last 2 minutes in a fight with a real man. Let alone dare speak to a reasonably attractive woman like me in public. You can see his rant in the link above, here’s my reply;
Foreveralone, wow, I’ve seen all your memes. And when gay men want to rape you, since they’re men and only their desires matter, that’s their right, as you said. Because you can’t deny consent to a man. 🙂
It would backfire on nancy boys like you. Don’t drop the soap.
And might I remind everyone that it still counts as rape with other objects e.g. a stick, a cactus or a wide piece of metal pipe. So the women could rape him too.