A Critical Review of Genius Famine’s Review

Because it’s been years since I read the book, (it actually came out in 2014-2015, moron) I’m going to ‘review’ (rip to shreds cruelly) this review. [tldr: Y’ALL NEED HBD, JESUS.]

5,000-ish words. Putting the shit into shitposting.

Because I can.

I feel I’ve lost YEARS off my life doing this, like the machine in Princess Bitchin’ Bride.

That’s its name now.

They’re bigging up Charlton because so many others (including yours truly) did first. Happy little lemmings of the online trend.
I’m happy for him and his co, Genius Famine is a solid 4-star book. It’s actually K-selection, that missing puzzle piece, a norm of religiosity is a part of it, not the other way around. Also, excess religion kills everyone. Massive hypothetical problems right there. MOVING TAYLOR SWIFTLY ON.

I need another yacht party, preserve me in Russian Standard.
http://www.vdare.com/articles/the-genius-famine-the-death-of-religion-will-lead-to-the-death-of-genius-and-the-death-of-civilization

WE NEED HARDER SCIENCES. It’s a little like porn, the soft stuff is never enough.
“intelligence is negatively correlated with genetic signs of high mutational load–such as an ‘asymmetrical’ (ugly) face”
I linked to that the other day lately, and I’m basically the ONLY person round these parts who calls it mutation load when the correct scientific nomenclature is ‘genetic load’. I thought mutation/al was more descriptive. I am one literary bitch. WHO is stealing my shit?
Naturally, the only solution to an unnatural, manmade boom is artificial eugenics. I digress. There isn’t even a bar cart in sight. It’s my inner alcoholic.
Charlton tries so sincerely to answer an HBD question with philosophy, applying religion to (a problem of) evobiology is one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard. My linking to his blog was intended as a supplement, not the substantive meal. For that, look up key HBD authors. If God himself came down on a fluffy cloud and zapped people with lightning bolts like a rock star Zeus, it still wouldn’t change the fact DNA exists and evolutionary genus have undergone speciation. If God created everything, why is any of his creation a bad thing to you? Where is your faith? Why wouldn’t He want us to understand all the incredible detail He threw into this video game? He’s got the whole world in his hands. So technically, God is cupping your balls. Respect Him.
The Industrial Revolution is fingered in A Troublesome Inheritance (uncited) but the evidence to support it is limited. Sharing the technology seems to have been the problem, the profit motive. Releasing certain technologies puts them in the hands of the low-IQ by default. This doesn’t end well, see the concepts of game theory and the arms race for further details.


There were actually two sexual revolutions before the one we know of the 1960s. Boomers are not the pivotal generation of history. The 60’s finale is the nail in the Western coffin with the Long March Through the Institutions, as the brilliant minds of the prior century finally died off.
1 – The Romantic Movement of the early 1800s. You’ve heard of it, Byron? Suddenly feelings were more important than facts and everyone realized what a special snowflake they were.
2 – The Belle Epoque and a little beforehand. The lifetime of Oscar Wilde fits it neatly. Again, the postwar generosity of K-types to struggling unfit societies in the name of God is the problem. Yes, I posit that Missions from God are demonic. When you consider everything they spawned to the outgroup is suffering – from the continued spread of leprosy, booming and starving populations, the rise of HIV, NGO child rape scandals and various tribal wars over scarce resources, the do-gooders of the 19th century killed it for the whole world of the 20th onward, who have had a dependent child in the guilt over the Third World it created ever since. Prove me wrong, internet. I know you can’t.

There’s an academic book, about 500 pages, called Pathological Altruism if you wanna know the mindset behind dumb white people who selfishly think the whole world should aspire to be Just Like Them. As if that’s possible or desirable. It’s written by a woman though, so I don’t expect it to make the same splash in this part of the internet, that constantly complains there aren’t enough women (while insulting and ignoring our contributions, bc thinking tits are terrifying).

HBD answers the concerns about inter-class fertility/fecundity, because class is rather constant based on your genome down the centuries. As in, social mobility has its limits. You can look all this stuff up in your own sweet time, you are literally online to be reading this, you’ve got no excuse.
This is forbidden science because it is predictive. The current paradigm of equalism is not.
The factors mentioned in this article precisely fit into other topics.

e.g.
Family size – time preference, present and historical age at marriage, cultural expectations, national wealth and debt. Therefore, you’d expect Western(er) fertility will NEVER rise until national debt is removed as a dysgenic pressure. Not one of you wankers boo-hooing over the future has mentioned this. Clarey got close.

Not as random as it sounds.
I say Westerner because Magic Dirt isn’t real and we don’t want to bring up fertility in the West using non-Westerners, who have their own homeland to despoil. People are not interchangeable cogs, personality is genetically heritable too! You can’t build high-trust healthy societies with people who prefer to marry their child cousins and rig elections.
DNA PROVIDES.
Luther, while based AF, not so much, on these topics.

The word dysgenic isn’t used in these conversations either. Atheism may be dyscivic but agnosticism is a human right. The Pope hates this.
Personality metrics are as important as IQ. Plenty of the world’s leaders are above-average IQ, they know what they are doing. These are the Fifth Column.
By chance alone, they couldn’t keep doing exactly the wrong thing for the People.
There are many myths about Christian fertility. If you breed beyond your ability to provide, another tenet of the religion, then all the children and the entire family die. This happens quickly or slowly, with reduced prosperity and poor marital prospects in times of K-selection, that either cause no marriage to occur, sub-standard fertility in the non-assortative pair match, excess labour and no creative production (bad for epigenetics) and/or mutation accumulation. Time preference correlates to industriousness and what we now call grit but is essentially prudence.
It’s tempting to claim Idiocracy! because listing pop culture in place of papers is part of the dumbing down you so despise but first you must understand what an Idiocracy is = r-selection.
The K-shift we are undergoing is a prelude to the Malthusian contraction of population better known as the Malthusian trap. Think the big toothy metal things in cartoons.
You cannot describe demographic patterns without the Malthusian trap.

Nobody cites the meme “demographics is destiny” when that’s obviously the topic too. If you’re trying to make the complex easy to remember for simple readers. I just use GIFs to break up the text. Evidence of too much thinking intimidates them, y’see.

Get with the clickbait times, grandpa

The best argument I have seen on the spread of upper-class genes by the death of the lower orders was the spread of Black Death. This happened in bursts that appear to correspond to social and cultural leaps. It also targeted the urban leeches.
It is not a coincidence.
The strangest regressive trend is the spread of STDs, which are not purely r-selected, since the species must reproduce in K-types too and spouses do cheat. In the era of premarital sex, they may have brought the infertility or birth-defect causing pathogens (by mutating development) into the marriage itself. Religion happens to prevent these problems e.g. no prostitution, keep celibate, it doesn’t answer them. The strongest candidate for a shift after Black Death is the probable damage caused by Syphilis. I noticed this but I haven’t found anyone to explicitly study it.
There is also the matter of atheist scientist superhero. It’s a myth of scientism. There is social pressure. Anonymously, plenty of scientists identify as non-atheist, something else. The atheism probability exists on a bell curve of one to two standard deviations; beyond this, belief in the supernatural and faith in bizarre, paranoid delusions also increases greatly.
That’s why they tend to go a bit ..loopy at the end. Especially the mathlete Olympiads.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Grothendieck

There’s a shocking lack of historical (OLD, dusty-ass) case studies (Freud did this! If Freud can do this!…) and historical or cultural asterisks on the (largely but hardly acknowledged personality) theories of Genius Famine, but the bare bones is correct.

Here’s where I go off on one.

“The emancipation of women only worsened this fall in IQ, argue Dutton and Charlton.”

There is no evidence and quite the opposite, as child IQ conforms highly to maternal IQ and there is growing evidence about the benefits of delaying motherhood, at least until after the teenage years, once the body has stabilized and ceased to grow. Men traditionally delayed fatherhood too but don’t expect parity in discussion because questioning your priors is so sissy apparently.
The suffrage was universal, as the most cursory reading of history will confirm. Women could actually vote in many places before it anyway. ‘Women’s suffrage’ is a feminist myth.
I’ve covered this and so have others, in extensive detail. Modern young woman is more conservative than the average young man and in Charlton’s own country, women now vote more conservatively than men. This is a mathematical trend you can take to the sperm bank. Calm down.

Fridge horror. Did nobody bother to look this all up?
Where is the intellectual curiosity in intellectuals these days?
You don’t just get to proclaim an opinion because of your name or its letters, or else we’d take Lena Dunham’s advice on the biology of abortion. This is called an appeal to authority, emotional children.

 

It’s also another reason I go anon. I don’t want to get attacked IRL for stating basic truths any asshole could point out with five minutes and an internet connection. You are already in the place you need to be, I’m crudely drawing a map.

“They have far fewer children than less intelligent women, who are more likely to become pregnant young and by accident”

That is a failing of the Sexual Revolution, availability and attitudes to contraception, the abandonment of fathers and all those things combined that caused the monolithic rise of the modern welfare state. These are the true culprits of the issue, not voting. Most socialists are men, for example. Cthulhu swims Left. The voting is splintered far more by race than it ever could be by sex, and not one of them has the stones to finger ‘race’ as an issue. Try studying Voting Behaviour 101. See the recent election of Trump, where white women mostly voted for him and hardly any non-white. It’s a racial composition matter.
On a finer note, I’ve yet to see a modern civilization that isn’t white in root or base. I don’t see civilization as a bad thing either, it depends what you consider Peak, a question the NRx keep bitch-slapping over, especially in the Catholic blogs, that I feel Brucey would enjoy.
It is also strange to note that they deny intelligent women exist – until it’s tempting to criticize us for our responsible breeding habits.[But if we’re irresponsible, we’re also evil single mothers? Because all conception is intentional, right? And the father will definitely marry them, huh? And finding a spouse is so easy for anyone, m/f, not-dumb? And they have magical solutions for all these conflicts of the postmodern with the biological? Without actually going into the biology of it? ] Intelligent women breed far more often than intelligent men, if you look historically. They do not. There is no comparison of the sexes upon which to make these snide remarks. They fixate on one half of a whole problem. Blame Women! as your standby is literally sexist (and stupid, these are societal issues). As would be Blame Men! be sexist, and stupid for similar, anti-natal reasons. I proffer Blame R-types, since they are exactly the problem here. It doesn’t stroke the ego but it settles the mind.

Women discuss family problems far more than men, you just don’t look for us.
Family politics is literally our domain, the home.
You don’t get to pretend this is your area. It shows. Low EQ and SQ.
Men crowd around a table and discuss money, women discuss socially.
Maybe ask mumsnet how easy raising babies is today?
IF so, why no more stay-at-home dads and let her do the ‘hard work’?

The looming factor post-IR isn’t mentioned once. The world wars were incredibly dysgenic.
The healthy and young and brave died. The cowards and feeble and corrupt remained safe and plump and sexed at home, to later provide for their children (Parental Investment Theory) and give them an advantage over war widows (the reason for our welfare state).
Draft limitations are a problem not one man has the courage to mention.

You spared the genetic detritus. Darwin is laughing at you.
Might I impose that this selective blindness is an arrogant bias, on part of a sex who wishes fully to blame the Other?
Where geniuses do breed, they do not mention the potential for dead-end mutations e.g. Goethe’s children.
I suppose they mustn’t know? That’s encouraging.

Not to mention the female germline is more stable. The male is prone to mutations, because it’s constantly regenerating. So any problems with homosexuality, for instance… yeah, that isn’t on women. Infertility in men is literally measured by their mutations. Little X-men swimmers. The superpower is schizophrenia.

The American Model of collegiate academia killed the Medieval University of Europe. Chief among the concerns is tenure. There is no sound reason for tenure, a form of academic welfare. Naturally, I expect too much for academics still in the Matrix-like system to admit this. Universities have too much money and hence waste their time. It’s affluenza on the level of an organisation. I do not expect that idea to be popular, but it is the truth. If Harvard couldn’t be left money in donations and wills, would it be so arrogant? Would the conceit spread to its founders? Why is the state teat extended to these people? They have become like the modern church, with the same problems e.g. tax exemption. The Bible says ya gotta pay taxes. The Vatican gets around this by being the State. Again, I don’t expect these problems to magically wax into focus given the bias of the writers, I have to mention it.

And someone’s going to act like it can afford to go unsaid.

“Academics contribute to this by getting funding, publishing frequently, and attending conferences.”
The social scene is poison. There, I said it. It’s populated by the midwits Vox Day complains about. They think they’re clever because they all mutually agree. Aren’t they lovely? Good in front of a camera, bad thinkers.

It is a little sexist to call the model of fault Head Girl when her role is often second to Head Boy and anyone British knows what a massive kiss-up the Head Boys are. Most of the leading academia they complain of is still generally male, so I wonder how they can square that circle…

The obedience of school is the Prussian model. It’s based on the male military complex. Before that, the rote form to teach monks. ..Were they girly too?
Boys’ schools do not magically produce geniuses on par with Tesla. Women and femininity are not the problem and assuredly not a weakness. This is a cheap, trivial argument. The problem is sub-par management, which, if you look at politics too, is decidedly male. Is the masculinity a problem? No. Gender has nothing to do with it. The people running the show are simply incompetent, due to generations of suck-ups getting promoted, largely thanks to credentialism.
I fear they may be a little intimidated by the findings that girls’ scores have exceeded boys’. Well, if we stopped grading on a curve, used a mixture of testing metrics (papers and exam because there are problems with both), in an anonymous exam condition it’s the same paper, either you know your stuff or you don’t. If we stopped grading on a curve, male grades would slip further down because they don’t care, they’re kept in education beyond vocation age (13-14). Girls are more receptive to any instruction, including education. Blame the white matter, learning is a social experience. Maybe in one-on-one tutor setups boys would do better, but good luck getting state funding for that!
Also, why do grades need to be an intersex competition? Curriculums have always been crap, you’re meant to go beyond it.
“This person will be excellent at playing the academic game and will make a great colleague. But they won’t innovate; won’t rock the boat.”
The problem there is a culture called collectivism, it is the opposite of Western individualism and dampens creativity. Snuffs it, kills it dead. It’s prevalent in Asia, not female-only spaces. You also cite a personality trait called agreeableness and another, conscientiousness. Personality types are not wrong per se, they have a place. Bad academics were hired there by other bad academics who slipped through the old net and now academia is bad. Where is the XX in this, specifically? There were all-good female colleges and still are, same with boys’. Don’t grasp for simplistic bullshit.
If you knew as many stories about Catholic boarding schools as I do, you’d know godly obedience is not the norm. Have you heard of St Trinians? If anything, the veil of religion is an excuse to misbehave, because you can just go out on Saturday and confess to a priest on Sunday and it’s all fine with The Big G by Monday.
Naturally, I don’t expect two men to know this. However, it’s their job to check.
Part of the rationale of mixed sex schools was to reduce rebellion caused by sexual frustration, by channeling it socially. It has been moderately successful, except class sizes present a new issue.
The above incompetent management issue applies to religious schools for boys as well, that also have rampant abuse (fagging), pedophilia and homosexual problems... don’t ask the ‘hard’ questions though, guys. Very manly.

“Once upon a time, they note, a ‘country vicar’ had lots of free time to research” –botany, no
You can’t build a quantum tunnel in the average English garden. Stop it. Citizen science is dead barring medical trial subjects.
Ironically, those botanical studies led to the theory of evolution. It is strange to read a man who clearly doesn’t believe in evolution, make references to biology that stands on it.
There were also scientific nuns. They do not get a look-in (ever) although they meet the criteria of being both heavily religious and scientific….
Moreover, the search for Adam and Eve led to fossil studies. It’s almost like you can’t suppress epistemic truth and this upsets idiots.

“The genius has no institution to nurture him and his potential will not be fulfilled.”
He has never needed one, he needs a shed.
Scholarly pursuits didn’t begin in the Middle Ages!

Let’s wrap this up a little.

The problems are thrice:
1. if everyone is equal, nobody is special and there’s no such thing as genius. We don’t need to worry about it or nurture it because we must deal with the dullards and dunces, who need us the most, say the low-IQ themselves, who want to feel superior to someone.
2. if geniuses can’t get credit and funding, they can’t do anything. Duh. Science has a price tag.
3. if geniuses somehow happen to succeed, society looks for any way to tear them down out of envy, from claims about mental illness (currently, autism) to political reasons or simply Tall Poppy Syndrome.

Obviously.

“But we have reached a point where our lives are so secure, and where death is so remote, that we no longer believe that our lives, or our society, has eternal significance.”
All Cultures Are Equal lies. PC censorship, yes, we know about.
Punishment of in-group preference.
I mean, these concepts aren’t hard to research.
Most exist on wikipedia, for beginners.
“Western society is selfish; the human race is damaging the Earth.”
Those are two separate points. Europe is the only continent below replacement level.
We are the only sustainable continent. No conversation on sustainability can be had until we address population. The Left thinks it owns the environment as a topic, but they’re really retaining ground so we cannot discuss this in the mainstream, public spheres (denying a platform?)…
“In addition, our high level of comfort means that the problems with which a genius may now grapple are either too theoretical to care about or too long-term to think about now.”
Lie.
“He will cause offence and question the dogmas which give us the comfort of certainty all for the sake of a problem so distant that most of us can postpone thinking about it.”
Lie. I’m sick of these sweeping statements that pretend to be scientific. You get some jumped-up upper-middle class white prick who thinks he’s the next Hitchens because he ‘cares’ about XYZ topic (right-wing virtue signalling). Hitchens read books before mouthing off. For many years. Go back to reddit if you want delusions of grandeur.
“In this context, of life not being serious, we would expect the genius to be pilloried.”
How is life less serious now for anyone paying attention? Literally how? Where is my surfboard to coast?
It’s more serious and seriously depressing than ever!
Sweeping statements!
Geniuses are not insulted, they are denied. They are disqualified so as to be ignored! The findings may as well not have happened!
The cultural message is Noblesse Oblige is dead. We don’t need you, we haz iPhones.
Unmentioned goes the fact that most illustrious scientists were members of the aristocracy. I guess Neoreaction slices a little too close to the nerves!

Academia just replicates the environment of aristocracy – badly.
Look up the story of ‘snob’.

“And geniuses are more sensitive than most.”
In themselves, yes. Externally? Have you read the stories about Newton? He was a Grade A pillock socially, a total misanthrope who neither cared about nor sought approval. It was awesome.
He was worse than House. #herogoals
But I suppose the author wants to self-identify (Hello, Millennial) with Illustrious Status Group by the convenient emotions of existence. Why? If what you’ve written in that very paragraph is true, you’d be signalling anything you could that you were anything BUT a genius, if they’re so openly reviled!
Common sense, there is not.

“Life will become harsher and simpler and, eventually, more religious.”
This is already happening with economics and I linked to Jaymans exemplary coverage of liberal fertility being a feature, not a bug.
They tend to assume all religion is good for science though, when clearly it’s just the one (Protestantism) that allows it.
Not one big Mormon scientist, is there? Catholicism literally killed people for doing maths during the Renaissance. We could be living on other planets and piloting flying cars by now if the Pope weren’t a thing (and nothing in scripture says we need one). The Bible actually says to beware of false prophets who try to replace scripture and that God wants his followers to be happy and prosperous. That would be an easier sell, huh? Human rights aren’t really negotiable if you want someone’s labour so persuasion is the trick.
“At the moment, it seems that there’s nothing we can do to stop this short of a horrendous reversion to pre-Industrial levels of child mortality.”
We won’t stop magically knowing how child-rearing has evolved, this kind of knowledge isn’t academic. It’s preserved in the matrilineal line. This is obvious.
No blackpills unless they’re real.

“But if we could better nurture genius then somebody might come up with a solution before it is too late.”
Almost sounds like the entire point of eugenics. And do you want historical reversion or progress? Biblical living standards or First World ones? Decide. Pick one.
Also, way to pass the fucking buck. You want it? You do it, prick.

These people say they’re So Smart (complete with IQ claims) …but not smart enough to get off their arse and actually do something.

Sure thing, kid. And they call us damsels.

Your armchair philosophy is gonna Save Da World.

Adults in the room, inwardly:

Why should a Feynman work for you?… There is no sane answer to this question. Rand’s stake of a point in the heart of greedy vampire societies that don’t appreciate the people who make it so good. Marx said who do you work for? Rand says WHY.
God-damn the entitlement of normies to the hard-earned property of the intellectual.
Fruits of one’s labour, a human right. Read your philosophy, child. Sowing, reaping…

It justifies the homesteading and other stuff you advocate when civilization ‘dies?’ If tribes in the middle of nowhere can acknowledge this, the higher IQ should be able to wrap our heads around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_theory_of_property#Exclusive_ownership_and_creation
Anything less is slavery. It’s a theft of one’s LIFE-TIME.

It is evil. Bible says a man who will not work, should not eat.

Aaron Clarey has actually covered this, there is no greed, there is only theft. It’s well-known in economics that anything less than a choice is force. That’s left-wing, isn’t it? All working [no leisure, no robots] … according to his abilities…[like you can work above them?] in a kind of commune [rejects family]… that contains everyone [supranationalism, no borders, open borders]… for universalism, a value. [we call this multiculturalism, still]
A little on the theft and self-ownership angle. This isn’t egalitarianism in the modern variation that doesn’t work, it’s from humanism, originally.
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/curr-students/IB/IB-lecture-notes/ib-p7-plt-handout-1.pdf

At most, they the producer get to choose to limit it to potential consumers as they see fit – exclusive to themselves, genetic kin…not everyone. This is Polyanna stupidity, Bill Gates has kept most of his fortune and he’s meant to be the nice one. As stated above, taking things from geniuses is part of the Problem TM. No regulation, no oversight, no Nanny State. Control is part of the ownership conditions. I don’t get to decide to sell your house. They got to that point, you didn’t – they earned the right to tell you to fuck off and build your own spaceship.

Pearls of wisdom are not for the herd of swine. Nope.

“The genius will combine this very narrow intelligence with very narrow interests.”
Hahahahahaha, you’ve never met one, have you?
They take time to decide on topics and between those, they rove. See von Neumann.
Don’t believe the Hollywood trope of a man in slacks sitting in front of a blackboard screaming WHYYYYYY? at the air (or God?) and throwing balled-up pieces of paper at his coworkers who JUST. DON’T. UNDERSTAND. Like that’s *their* problem. The tortured genius is trite and over-used as a metaphor for teenage angst.

STAHP.


“He’ll also be socially awkward and eccentric.”
Define this. Everyone is a weirdo once you get to know them for a few years.
Do you mean autism?
Rain Man wasn’t autistic.
Stop.
Being.
Stupid.
Question.
Your.
Assumptions.

Priors. Whatever fancy fucking name you want. If it makes you feel clever, delta/gamma-tier.

I proceed, insulting nobody in particular.

“They tend to be useless at everyday things”
I knew. I just kneeeew the digs would come in eventually. Point three.
Do you mean all of these people are savants?
No.
And you don’t technically need to be autistic to have savant or splinter skills.

Do they look this up?

*whispers* NO.

INTELLIGENCE IS NOT A DISEASE.
DO NOT PATHOLOGISE IT.

WHY AM I YELLING.
BECAUSE IT’S THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT IN THIS CRITIQUE AND I LIKE YELLING, IT’S 5AM HERE.

If you actually want a society led by people better than you (some kind of aristocracy cmon), to care and take care of you, then don’t play into the enemy’s mind games.

“they are very fragile people and they are not usually interested in money”
Are they children? Can they not develop? Well, if you’re basing that last on the tenured….
“They need long-term security so that they do not have to worry about ordinary things, which they not interested in and are no good at.”
I feel basing this on mathematical niche SWPL men of the 20th century America is a method flaw.
Einstein is not the prototypic genius. Read more.
He became famous as a meme. The tongue meme. You know the one.

“If we can make these changes, insist Dutton and Charlton, then in spite of declining intelligence, it is possible that a genius may be produced who can develop a solution to this problem”

And I must scream.
What problem.
Define the problem.
HOW.
Use your four operational brain cells.
IF no geniuses = problem, how can we sprout one like a magic beanstalk of N-IQ?
IF intelligence is declining, surely plug the leak in the boat before you begin to bail?
IF there are geniuses, give them the media platform. Give them power. The media platform is the biggest problem because it encourages the stupid. Stop the comedies and MTV reality shit, even the ones you like you must give up America. It’s like taking a dummy from a baby, for much the same reasons.
IF academia is the problem, it isn’t geniuses then, is it? It’s the Cultural Marxist structure that is hostile to anyone that tells the truth.
IF someone had a solution, none of you would listen. That’s your own point, by the way!
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
Being lectured about degeneracy from a resident of New York.
The irony is five miles deep into Chomsky’s rectal cavity.

I quit this topic, for like… five months, until I’ve forgotten why I hate it again.

I already know the default reaction to this post, for example.

How shitposty do I have to be for you to listen to me? This is proof of what I mean, you complain everything spoonfeeds but then throw the rattle when someone dares break it down because it wasn’t how you’d do it. That’s the purpose of teaching, dumbass. You can’t yet. It wouldn’t work.

It isn’t personal, it’s societal. Not everything is about you.

Get new rhetorical strikes, please. Buy some. Get a GF pillow and a sense of humour too.
Next there’ll be a series of E-books on How to Save Western Civ and step one is grab the testes’ cream…
None of this will be glib, for we are truly the damned. How can you fix people who brag about being broken? How can you save what you can’t find? How can you cooperate with people who turn everything into a WWF match?

Could the Alt Right be too popular?

It’s attracted a lot of free riders off the coat-tails of various claimed ‘successes’.

Myself, I don’t think memes count as work, they’re just a bit of fun slinging at the precious Narrative.

I’ve been watching very closely and thinking carefully about The Next Step.

I can’t honestly say there is one. If this turns out to be a purely-memetic trend, it will shortly implode, possibly to change into a more extreme form. I know there are people who probably want that to happen, the SJWs in particular, this way when they scream ‘literally Hitler’ something might stick.

I think the core issue with AR is attracting too many socialists.

They think they can play both sides in effect, a new breed. I’ve complained in the past about the fence-sitting social liberal, economic conservative but this is the opposite. I’ve never seen it before. The social conservative, economic socialist. It makes no logical sense whatsoever. The economics and social policies must match. This is looking like edgy libertarianism, with additional servings of autism and grievance.

We have plenty of just grievance, we don’t need to make any up.
Don’t get me started on the weakness of civic nationalism.

Too much conflict, too few standards.

There’s no such thing as a right-wing socialist, FFS.
We need K-selection, not slightly weaker r.

There’s too many heavy symbolism issues dragging the good ideas back. History didn’t work or we’d still have it.

There’s too many crazies or obnoxious fools being let in, if they signal.
Ahem, since when did we give a damn about virtue signalling?

I covered this before in the ‘hypocrisy of the signalling right’.

They’re not held to any standard. Most are atheist and happily genetic suicide.
We need a minimum barrier of knowledge without blocking people who want to understand.

A few have clear disturbances that nobody begs them to correct.
Filtering out the embittered (especially at Mom/women) would do a world of good, they tend to congregate on that idea. Fine, go live on a homoerotic island with all your bro-boyfriends. It’s like claiming a modern   Matriarchy, it’s absurd. Some MRA and MGTOW types have been picked up and given a platform to turn us against one another. Division in a gender war is what the SJWs want. It’s anti-natal.

The men do not police the other men and naturally the women can’t do it. Few women stick around for the general shouting-down from the obnoxious oafs. It drives away that spirit of cooperation required.

What’s the plan? What’s the goal?

Memes are beyond the lolz, they contain ideas. They carry philosophies. They are not vapid insults. See Wrath of Gnon’s superb interview.

This is why the Left can’t meme. They lack the underpinning of reality.

They’re right, though. It is a war of ideas… but it never ends. Where is the vanguard?

We may be skirting into similar delusory territory. It’s like that silly ‘get back in the kitchen’ meme. Meanwhile, the West dies.

I find myself going back to the neoreactionary materials, as you must’ve noticed. Other traditionalist places too. There’s only so many times you can see the n-word thrown around for shock value before you realize you’re not going to get an intellectual debate about the future of the West and civilization with these children.

A change is coming and we need to clean house. The nihilists and the promiscuous are the worst – the prosocial rot, the antisocial cancer. Druggies after that. All degenerate really means is antisocial, as in, bad for society, anti-societal and dyscivic. These ‘hobbies’ are not individual, they cause social harm e.g. antibiotic resistance.
We cannot decry degeneracy when we allow degenerates. We’re not Jesus, we can’t absolve them. If they’re hell-bent, so be it. It’s God’s will, they deserve to be there. Missionaries do not fear God because they have a Messiah complex, trying to save everyone. Few deserve salvation. You need leave them only breadcrumbs – those are memes.
The Left is strong because it is a lifestyle and because they feel strong and united from the cheerleader effect. The media crumbling, the narrative imploding, damages their bubble illusion.

You can’t attract good people with negative degenerates.

We don’t want to implode like the shitheap that was the manosphere.

This is without going into the distinct probability of black ops. I mean, wouldn’t you?

This MSM attention is making me nervous for the first time ever.
Woman’s intuition, something is wrong. This has been too quiet, too easy for a while.

We don’t have any lifestyle guidance. None of the basics our forefathers took for granted. Places like artofmanliness come close to what I mean. Nothing about music or art or books to read. Where is the right’s culture?
Where are the lists? Where are our curricula?

We need a vision of utopia. Or what are we aiming for?

We’d be weakened as pure, modernist reaction to online sensationalism. Event-based. We need to become the event others respond to.

If this becomes a popularity contest at the expense of substance, it’s a pageant. There are too many farces of Patriarchs that can’t even do their own laundry let alone raise a family and keep a wife happy.
We can do better than the Patrick Bateman metrosexual model of masculinity, all fake muscles and ‘notches’.
These are the people who don’t get that Fight Club is satirical. They’re living the ridiculous.
The West doesn’t want more cushion dogs. Speaking of, treating dogs like kids is creepy. Stop it. You’re as bad as cat ladies. It’s Paris Hilton Syndrome.

The energy-giving, useful people like me and others are retreating. We don’t want to cope with the dross.
I think we’re unconsciously waiting for them to get bored or self-destruct, as hedons always do. Then we sweep back in to clean up. I fear we may have invited in the ideological equivalent of locusts, they kill any movement they join like losers picking up a fashion trend. The degenerate are the most worthless humans you shall ever encounter, it’s like babysitting children. They slag off snapchat but use ‘XD’ seriously. Male thots. All about attention. Nix the narcissists in your midst or perish. They aren’t allies but fairweather friends.

Look up the rest of the phrase ‘birds of a feather flock together…’.

The r-types will necessarily drive away the Ks. Problem is, this is a pure K-movement. They’re the barbarians, the fifth column. They don’t want change but they seek our power, to take it. What do you expect from socialists? All they do is eat, eat, eat away at the People.

Man card isn’t a thing. It doesn’t exempt you from explanation, falling in line with the group’s standard of conformity, from working yourself, making changes and it certainly doesn’t give you a license to whine, bitch, order around women or better men. In the Old Testament, men had rites of passage and standards of etiquette to have any power, or else they were children.

You fire the lazy employee. You shun the slothful activist. This isn’t a fucking hippy commune.

This is work, bitch.

We don’t have champers for socialists. The hen keeps her bread. Welcome to K-shift, have fun.

Empire and economics (inflation, deflation, hyper)

Speculative but educated post. I wrote this a few days ago but took those off out of respect.
It goes from professional to shitpost-territory. A lot of known-knowns you’re supposed to pretend not to know.

8,000 words, most of them shit-tier.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/inflation-or-deflation-debate-continues.html

“A key issue in this debate is that not all debt is created equal, while a parent often absolves a loan to their child the bank seldom forgives a loan on an automobile. Sometimes like in the reality game show Survivor it comes down to who is left standing. I contend winning does not always come down to who is the best, strongest, or smartest, but that luck and many other factors also come into play in how things unfold. For example, imagine two widget factories on the hill outside of town and both with the same pricing and quality product but financially weak, if a storm knocks out production at one factory resulting in its closing the other would benefit from inheriting its customers and maybe even able to raise prices. This comes down to the idea of old fashion supply and demand. This revolves around the supply of money just as much as it does to the supply of the commodity it is being used to purchase. We are often forced to question the formulas used to compute inflation.”

On hyperinflation risk;

“I continue to contend the primary reason that inflation has not raised its ugly head or become a major economic issue is because we are pouring such a large percentage of wealth into intangible products or goods. This includes currencies. If faith drops in these intangible “promises” which is the base of our financial system and money would suddenly flow into tangible goods seeking a safe haven inflation would soar. This theory will be explored more in part 2 of this three-part series.”

Hm.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/coming-economic-end-game-may-be-more.html

“Following this and I do mean following as by “several” months, central banks will be forced to unleash such a massive amount of new currency into the system to combat the scourge of deflation that it will stagger the mind. This will in effect clear the deck of deadwood through hyperinflation and pave the way forward to introduce a new or a “batch of new” currencies.”

I don’t think we’ll trust the old money-lenders with a new currency. There’d be no faith without a change in leadership and I mean total.

The debts that are not written off will become a moot point in that most will be devalued and paid off in worthless paper. The important issue will not be fairness but how to get from here to there with the least damage to the institutions and wealth those in power seek to protect. Sooner or later all great Ponzi schemes must come to an end.”

Student loans are bullshit, exhibit A. You can’t tax labour that hasn’t happened.

You can expect promises to be rewritten and broken. Rules will change as we go through the wash. Most people will see their assets rinsed away as society is put through the wringer. For example, expect the cost of living adjustment on social security to be modified reducing payments to the elderly. Adding to the woes of retirees is that many pensions will be forced to reduce payouts and break promises as the returns on their investment fail to meet expectations. Many of the guarantees and paper promises granted over the past decades will prove to be less valuable than the paper they are printed on.”

Pensions were immoral anyway, fuck the people who never bothered to save.
You can’t promise someone else’s money, especially in the future, that may never manifest (Rise of the NEETs).
The pensioners wish to tax the blood and tears of the young, if work’s so good for everyone, they can join in.
Real estate will drop like a stone in the ocean, it was puffed up by foreign investment from dodgy governments but without anyone willing to purchase at (their) prices, the move to cashless will try and curtail any black market bartering. We’re already living under Junk Food Prohibition to anesthetize us.
There is no such thing as a blue chip. All stocks are equally worthless without workers. Marx didn’t account for the stock market but it requires cooperative workers and a stable currency. Cue laugh track.
I dislike this gloomy tone but there’s no way around it. The loss of personal savings by citizens is the tragedy, shitty
investments in the property bubble deserve to die, you have an obligation to maintain property the same way as a classic car.
At least cars are valuable by brand and model, the location of your home is dependent on local demographics so it’s no wonder immigration is an *issue* to those with large holdings wanting to preserve their ill-gotten gains and continue to squeeze the youth like we won’t snap at some point. The low-IQ imports may be violent but otherwise not a threat, it’s the people who placed us in this situation for greed that must be dealt with in the French way.
Generation Rent doesn’t just apply to houses – we stream, we eat out and we’re raised on convenience. When all that supply chain goes away, a lot of former Communist Guardian readers will become capitalist without their coffee fix. If you count latte as coffee.
Of particular note will be the starvation of the public sector, as it deserves via unfunded liabilities (i.e. grand theft stato). The Unions will attempt to demand value that doesn’t exist at the same time the gibs are spoiling and rioting for their soma of shitty tech and shittier food.

“Many of the guarantees and paper promises granted over the past decades will prove to be less valuable than the paper they are printed on.”

As a child, I was told never to trust an IOU because you never know what will happen to the person writing it and neither do they.

“As pawns in this game, we can either choose to sacrifice ourselves or fight. In this case fighting means to undertake a strategy that protects what we can of the life we have created within the power we have been granted. The fact you are reading and thinking about this subject puts you in a far better position than the masses who see before them blue skies and unicorns grazing upon a hill.”

The fatted calf who thinks it’s going on a pleasant walk.

“Make no mistake, we cannot and should not look for a white knight to come riding in to save the day, no such leader exists to lead us out of the economy hell we have created.”

Yes, no such person exists, except the rebuilding effort after the expulsions. Deporting the traitors is more important than the invaders and this way they ruin whichever country they land in. You shouldn’t want to save this system unless you’re one of them.
The normalcy bias and expectations of Economic Jesus ready to forgive all our fiscal sins is keeping it ticking over.

“hard assets need to be in your possession and hidden away.”

TP and painkillers, got it.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/empires-often-collapse-from-cancer.html

The problem appears to be usury. It’s really economic slavery. Babies can’t sign contracts and give consent, however much you want to financially circumcise them of a liberty-filled future.

“We need a good war” – yes, but not the kind that costs money.
The democratic comes first, then the civil.
A money war is what all elites want and spoil for the head of the supply queue like fat pigs.
Their children have two passports and a private jet, they won’t enter military service.
Anyone with a second passport cannot be considered loyal to their country.
I think a lot of the young are going into credit card debt for necessities or because they believe it’ll be written off once
the companies go under. Self-sabotage, sabotages the system.
The middle-class and middle-aged will pay with their assets, as they deserve.
In this system, it pays to have a lot or almost nothing.
Lower Boomers and Upper Gen X are fucked.

from counter signal memes

It isn’t the 1% or the .1%.
It’s the 20% or so (uppermost tax bracket, The Rich) supporting them.
Chop down the supports, usually in investment banking and they fall too.
“the massive government that promised so much.”

If you believe in a free lunch you deserve to wash dishes.

“Corruption and crony capitalism are cancers on society that continue to grow if not constantly addressed with harsh
measures.”
Who are these cronies? Why not begin a list?
You know, for when the bill comes.
“The whole concept of economic growth is based on an ever growing trend of year over year increased production.”
Modernism.
One line beforehand:
“the question remains as to when and what the new rules will be.” Traditionalism. Localism.
That these people are blind to that option show it is the way it must go.
“By removing the incentive for people to save and encouraging risk we have eroded the quality of economic growth.”
And people.
This will be a hard reset selecting for character. The question is what character.
“in short, we have to move forward faster in each coming year just to keep growing.”
Carlin’s Circling the Drain
“All this underlines that we are living in “interesting times” while playing havoc with the value of things and what they are worth”
Speak for China.

Patriotism for which country, is the political question? Which principles governing which country and which policies from which time periods? That is all the NRx, Alt Right and other traditionalist groups are discussing.
The Fall of the Empire is a given, but how do we replace it without losing our living standard?
Who wants to go Amish or Sharia?

comment
“Do you supposed that America is cursed for not praising God in spirit and truth anymore, but rather in vain?”
You must abandon God before God abandons you. You don’t notice this…until you know it.
America became the nexus of decadence, rewarding degenerate citizens. They deserve to collapse.

Demographics is the science economics wishes it could be.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/why-world-economy-likely-collapse-1-simple-chart
I once read a theory that humans do sense impending disasters like other animals.
However, this is reflected in our breeding habits, because we don’t want to lower overall family fitness and lose everyone by increasing strain with a baby’s constant needs. In a war, the crying also makes you hard to miss. I never forgot it and I think there is something to it. Even Guardianista are delaying childbearing because of a deep, gut feeling it’s a bad idea right now. Babies make you easier to enslave because you can be threatened and protecting them places the mothers out in the open or other dangerous positions. Especially if the family is on welfare or otherwise incapable of feeding itself, the hosts will all die. Those adopting foreign babies are playing both sides – whoever wins, they do.
It is no coincidence 65IQ Muslims breed like rabbits in Europe – they plan on many of them dying.
As long as the West contains pre-war native levels, we are fine. Baby Boomers are surplus to requirement. We can rebuild along Empire lines with Empire numbers. There is greater IQ DENSITY per individual, nobody other than the West has this advantage, so sub-replacement isn’t as terminal for us as it would be for other races. This assumes good operations, healthy society.
Part of the reason so many Indian and Arab men are coming here – they sense good pickings of women.
Whether we’re game or not.
They underestimate the ancient spirit, even of the women. Whites have been in slumber a long time. Like an angry bear in a cave stirring. The Boomers didn’t have enough kids, another pressure onto the heap of burning grievance. To do what a brood used to. When the middle-class Marxists realize Marx was a parasite and there’s no free food unless they’re the ones producing it – oh, the sea change will be a tidal wave. Students turning on the lying teachers who burdened them with debt for the privilege.
“These trends are about to get much worse, from an economic and consumption standpoint.”
Civilized peoples aren’t supposed to keep reproducing this much, nukes have made typical war corrections redundant.
A compact society of high-IQ and high-skilled is most flexible to political and long-term social change.
Europe is the most compact for our quality.
We can even drop to Industrial Revolution levels or possibly agrarian before that.
What about India? China? Can you picture Dubai without trucks of water and expensive lipsticks for the whores?
MENA will experience Full Malthus. The r-types sense this and try to flee, but they are the first wave of locusts, ironically they trigger the events. Do you really think the mixed race will remain here when times get tough? They’ll flee where resources are cheap – real home i.e. Pakistan, Afghanistan, India etc. Rats swim as the ship sinks, they don’t wait around.
They know the natives will want a return on their civic investment but they’ll soon discover their charity needs to be
recouped somehow.
“All the interest rate cuts and debt has been undertaken under the paradigm that it would be more easily repaid in the future…but now we’ve come to “the future” where there are fewer of us to service the debt, buy homes, buy cars, consume our way to prosperity…or pay the taxes to keep the social systems solvent.”
In the post-war period – they had one job. Fuck enough to make plenty of kids.
They failed and that’s why evolution says they deserve to starve to death. Not the young they robbed of the same youth they enjoyed at the expense of the blood of their own elders. They are grasshoppers without a fiddle and winter is coming.

speaking of, wasn’t this one of mine prescient?

“Absent a growing population of young to buy their assets (IRA’s, homes, etc.), we have a small problem (central bank asset purchases to the rescue).”
Ponzis collapse spectacularly. Billionaires won’t buy in the suburbs.

#NOBAILOUTSFORBOOMERS

“The implications economically, financially, societally, etc. etc. of a collapsing population of young and soaring older
population should be ringing alarm bells…but instead our politicians seem officially mindless (or intentionally misleading the populace) in the face of a cataclysmic shift.”
They’re fucking vampires and a stake should be driven through their black hearts for selling us into slavery for a few tacky holidays and wife-swapping fuckparties. They even want our blood’s proteins to stay youthful and fuck us over longer. We’d be farmed if they could, they’re sociopaths.
The elderly of our time are (in general) deserving of DIS-respect.

Here it gets juicy.

comment
“Someone should do something about those goddam africans….”
Just wall the whole continent off and let them either kill another or evolve. Leave them a hundred or two years.
Technology won’t save you, as libertarians are discovering.
We don’t have food, but we have 3D printers!
Nobody mentions food security.
We have become feeders, suppliers of the Third World. When the tax money stops filtering to the evil NGO complex, they’ll come find us to collect the caloric jizzya.
“That’s why they are called Jungle bunnies, they breed like rabbits.”
“The sooner it collapses the better for us young people. I want time to rebuild a little wealth after the previous
generations’ combined fuck up ruins everything before im too old to do anything useful”
The question becomes, what can’t they steal like Cyprus?
Franklin said to empty your purse into your head and then no man could take it.
Wise advice.
As for who dies first, the fatties.
The Government knows this and is hastening the process. How?
They know the book Nudge.
EITHER they lose the fat and become more productive, costing less too OR they let reaction formation kick in and eat themselves to death, also saving the state money.
I feel like the only person seeing this.
“Planned obsolescence has meant ‘consumption’ is at artificially high levels to begin with IMO.”
This includes people.
Tell me, which races have the greatest tendency to fat-store?
It isn’t the whitey, is it?
“Meantime the main problem is where to live. Most white people are still asleep, and you don’t want to live near them because they tend to get upset when their eyes are open.”

There is nowhere to run. New Zealand is now getting problems. White Flight is finished.

On feminism:
“Human fecundity is inversely proportional to female literacy rates. Compulsory education is killing us.”
reply “Yeah, once the wimmin learned blowjobs and masturbation in school it was all over for civilization.”
Mentioned only yesterday (as of writing), it isn’t a reproduction problem, and from all this it isn’t a problem. It’s preparation. The reproduction problem was a marriage problem. You should ban sexual entitlement. There is only the exclusive conjugal right.
Allowing people to spill their seed all over the place means they don’t reproduce, they take measures against it.
“Yes the obvious solution of too much government is to get government more involved in everyone’s lives, forcibly sterilizing people. We’ve had TOO MUCH freedom, see? It’s not that government and politicians made promises they can’t keep.”
It’s already dysgenic except for abortion and euthanasia.
Why not full eugenic?
“Just get rid of sec 8 and foodstamps. You’re on your own. It can’t happen all at once, but we need to slowly transition that way. These people with no skills should be out working farms in rural areas anyway because we shouldn’t be shipping food 1000s of miles around the globe before it gets to us. They never should have been herded into the cities in the first place. And if you don’t like your station in life, tough. Get some skills. Education is free on the internet these days. There are plenty of libraries. And if you think your poverty gives you the right to get violent and rob people you should be put to death. We used to hang horse thieves, not give them room and board and then welfare. The problem is not too many people. The problem is too many people think everyone deserves access to resoures they don’t own simply because those people exist.”
Like I said in why practically is the Left dead? abolishing the death penalty made a life of crime a possibility and we pay for those aggression genes to breed! A little eugenics required just to get back the old levels!
Resources are placed there by people who earned them, unless they buy on credit. Stealing property is a theft of the owner’s section of mortality to pay for it. Resources are individual, collective only to a family level based on CONSENT.

“Put all hot females in breeding camps and have the most fit males inseminate them then then pay people to raise them. Stupid, genetically damaged animals shouldn’t breed.”

Forced breeding? Like animals?

It’s disturbing how often people seriously suggest rape in civilization, the genetic theft worse than an object. Only the top .1% of men would be required for that, the rest could easily be exterminated like termites. What are the odds the guys suggesting it fit into that bracket when they can’t get, keep and satisfy a single woman? It would also require perfect IQ scores, and many making those suggestions are Third World trash stock. The odds are not in your favour if you had the shit for brains to comprehend them. White women are not your obedient concubines. And the fathers need to stick around to parent or the kids end up damaged, how many want to fuck and run? Fucking r-types, there’s a reason Patriarchy hanged them, they deserved it. Shit for brains and matching morals, just bestial.
They also seem to think Patriarchy means rape when it’s protection FROM rape by fathers and brothers.
Women have 9 months to abort and will out of spite, do not fuck with us. Reproduction must be consensual or men, for example, can easily be cucked.
Punish those who deliberately fuck/breed with inferiors. Especially social isolation. Let them become Morlocks.
The Great Replacement is supposed to distract us from the real need to clean house.
Let’s send all the liberals and bleeding heart celebrity luvvies to Africa once SHTF. They’ll be the only white meat, very moist.
“The writer of this article doesnt seem to understand that the niggers in Africa will literally eat each other if big problems start in the west or Asia. They cant even comprehend basic private property rights and we are to assume they will continue to pump out kids after the free shit from the west stops flowing. There is a reason why niggers didnt massively outbreed civilized folk before we showed up, that shit didnt just fall out of the sky. On top of that, once the medical technology or expertise the west provides to Africa disappears, theyll go back to dieing before theyre even twenty fucking one. I cannot stand these fucking idiots that somehow think Africa became so populous in a vacuum. These charts that try to predict the future are fucking retarded and so is anybody that gives them even a second glance.”
China is shipping human flesh, as mentioned. Whose flesh, is the question?
Outbreed actually means miscegenerate, not to overpopulate.
The white farmers sense the danger and want to move. If your ancestors are dumb enough to move in with savages who believe in cannibalism, please stay there. The gene pool will get a good clean of long-overdue stupidity.
The nitrogen fertilizer is required from the West, the chemical knowledge to produce it, even were the African farmers (real Africans) to suddenly all learn farming and grow a new continental personality. They’re lazier than Italians in July.

The British Empire was a mistake because it was the African Empire and the SJWs get that right. However, we don’t owe them jack. We gave them too much. We need a compound interest on our investment and we’ll step over their corpses once they’ve all killed one another in a probably religious cull back to sensible population levels.
civilize or economize, motherfuckers

It’s very easy to recoup your losses from a dead body.

This whole comment, damn that’s some Super-Fine research, segments;
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/why-world-economy-likely-collapse-1-simple-chart#comment-8862487
“It’s true. In the age of exploration, western anthropologists found food to cannibal tribes in a 2:1 ratio along the major african rivers. Food Cannibal Food Food Cannibal Food Food Cannibal….”
“A single man single woman household is something that evolved in North Western Europe during the last ice age. Women had to be beautiful (to show fertility) and able to bear and raise children in the harsh ice climate; men needed to be robust to hunt for long periods.
There are some 30,000 years of differential evolution between Africa and Western Europeans. Isn’t it likely there will be differences?”
Evolution doesn’t stop at the neck, ever.
“This time, the African’s – rather than eating each other, will just walk or boat into Europe.”
Not with British naval supremacy, mate. We can save Europe or just ourselves. I’m waiting to see where my stake is.
“Quote from A troublesome inheritance” A gentleman and a scholar. Tally ho.
Evolution is made by fucking yes but 2/3 up to 75% mostly by killing. This goes for any species, we’ve delayed Darwinism and defied natural selection for so long it’s going to be swooping Death. Hopefully Black Death will go on a comeback tour. I’m such a fan.
History won’t smile kindly on the African uplifters, including the original missionaries. Fucking idiots.
Slavery killed the Empires, thinking those inferior enough to allow conquest deserve a seat at the feast.
Those are your resources for your genetic kin. Do not assist the outgroup or you die.
The Victorians ignored this to fuck the available Oriental and African women. Once again, lust destroys anything good. If they couldn’t fuck slaves, they wouldn’t want to invade or keep them. As bad as the Ottomans in places.
Asia will go back to rice farming if they’re smart.
Otherwise, more crazy Emperors and Communism.
Leave them to it. They’re bloodthirsty in those harsh times anyway.
“Analysis of genomes from around the world establishes that there is indeed a biological reality to race, despite the official statements to the contrary of leading social science organizations. A longer discussion of this issue is offered in chapter 5, but an illustration of the point is the fact that with mixed-race populations, such as African Americans, geneticists can now track along an individual’s genome and assign each segment to an African or European ancestor, an exercise that would be impossible if race did not have some basis in biological reality.”
They haven’t mentioned the mixed-race psychiatric problem. When you hear ‘mental health issues’ check the status of the person talking. Oh, an evolutionally novel combination? High genetic load? No wonder it goes wrong. It’s like randomly mixing botanical extracts. Odds are you’ll end up with poison. Most mutations aren’t bad but fatal. Not always for the host but the host nation.
“The Cro-Magnon. Our ancestors. Athletic enough and intelligent enough to beat off H.Neanderthal. That we are not as robust as Cro Magnpn I assume is the result of changing sexual preferences and the value placed upon the effete aristocracy.”
Wars where only the fit fight and die. If it were equal and all fighting-age men went, that would be different.
Hardier men would develop in a few generations.
More dimorphism so also softer better-looking women too.
It isn’t just the breeding of the white peoples, it’s the quality!
“Lucky for us I don’t think demons can feed off robotic energy. Right? You got to keep some of the livestock alive to breed and raise the next generation?”
Rabbit farming, except the rabbits are the farmers. Who will guard them? Who is without bad blood? At that intergenerational level only blood pays for blood, only justice can be served before anything else.
This post turned really dark but it’s interesting.
At least as a thought experiment.
It reminds me of that tourist story where the Africans demanded children because there was no food and they were hungry. Now the question is, how long until they demand white children in Europe like Aztec sacrifices (no current leader in the big countries has a child among them!) and will they demand from the largest number group, the Muslims?
It would pay dividends to have two historic enemies destroy one another, to have the African eat the Arab and then dispense with the lower IQ remnants for the crime. History is cruel so that will likely play out.
I don’t like it but peaceable solutions are running low. Bear in mind, it takes about three weeks to starve. A year or two and enough cycles of hunger will have reduced their numbers drastically.
They are locusts near a food source, they salt the earth in effect.
If Africa weren’t so huge in real cartographical terms, they’d have gone extinct long ago.
South Europe is particularly screwed but they deserve it. Fail to protect your borders, get invaded. Like the Russians, the North has a secret weapon in the climate and our ability to banish. One harsh winter is all it will take and like in Game of Thrones, they will go South, where food is plentiful. Italians still butcher their food. They’ll be fine.
What do the runners want to replace this with? Chaos is an excuse.

“central banks operate in fiat.. which means fake… but they always prepare a new one in a new country when they have the current one set to collapse… think China now… .RUssia has always been the outlier.”
“Think for a moment of the thirty to fifty years of Suppressed Technology, Military Tech, Alternative Free Energy & Life Extension Tech that has been with held from Public Knowledge.”
“And, since Africa has 9 of the 10 lowest IQ countries in the world (and the average IQ of the whole continent is approx 75) the only population growth, on the planet, will be coming from people who would, on average, be regarded as mentally retarded in the US and Europe…. So it is even worse than the above maths indicates.”

Data? How dare you reply to emotion with reason!
“Wow – white folks are doing a great job “saving” Africa. Kudo’s. Too bad the God will have the final say on Africans.”
Mother Nature May I?
“Why can’t Africa produce something and be a net positive? Why would they be excluded from world population?”
Because you don’t count dependents as adults.
There is no need to import the low IQ or keep slaves minus sex slavery (rape) since robots came in.
So this coming Empire of Who-Knows-Who might be different.
A religion will rise though. Without the State mandating charity at the point of a gun. Christianity might be it as long as we remember compassion has survival limits.
The EU is failing because it believed egalitarian cog theory. The idea is you can be a lazy fuck and retire early as long as there’s some sap to replace you. You can’t replace the high-IQ with the low.
They become a greater drain by far. Then there’s the family they bring over…
On this vast scale, regression to the mean is law. Low-IQ becomes a chaotic entropy.
Europe has been suppressing its fertility and ability for decades. We’re overdue a resurgence of prosperity.
Do you think we’ll want to share?
Do the luvvies want to pay Commie taxes?
Smith was right, ‘human beings are a virus’. The r-selected, that is.
Equilibrium will come to you like Samael.
“which makes the remaining population wealthier on a per capita basis.”
It’s the Golden Goose ratio. More producers, more production on average minus the genocidal policies and disincentives and fewer drains = retention of wealth, compounding.
Foreign charity, the soft imperialism, gave the grandchildren’s birthright away because that anorexic attention whore Audrey Hepburn couldn’t stand to see African children thinner than her. Meanwhile, her own money went entirely to her own spawn. She didn’t surrender any to her own state, let alone the foreign.
Any suggestion of pathologically altruistic policy should be met with: YOU FIRST.
That wealth would have compounded nicely by now. Imagine no debt at birth but an investment. Sweet.
You don’t raise awareness, you raise funds. Other people’s funds. By attention-whoring, middle-class begging to grind down the working class, it’s classist, it kills the homeland competition. They know they’re doing it, they never do local charity work with the poor because they detest them.
You’re not Mother Theresa, she also took other people’s money despite dodgy origins. How nice of her.
End virtue signalling the assholes partake in like a traitorous sport and they’ll quickly find something else to do.
If you want to uplift another country so badly, you should be forced to move there. Also, petition to deport all white Muslims to Saudi Arabia, since it’s so peaceful and not at all Islamophobic. Hold them to the consequences, HARD.
Africa “have yet to pollute their lands because they aren’t yet industrialized.”
False, China recently bought Africa, including its people and nobody cares. Asians are ruthless in destroying natural
resources, look at Japan.
“And most importantly, they are over there and you are over here; they aren’t bothering you at all so why do you care how many babies and by whom that they have?”
~facepalm~
Why cuck for them? Why? Note mentioning the savagery, the rape, the cannibalism, the murder and political corruption triggers them. AKA the Truth.
He goes on!
“Africa has *plenty* of room to grow, that is why so many indians and chinese are moving their. Those two groups are like cockroaches (especially the chinese). They’ve overbred and they’re overcrowding their filthy countries so they emigrate and africa is slowing being taken over by them — so they can destroy those countries too. Africans aren’t bothering anyone; for the most part they stay on their continent and don’t bother anyone.”
Excellent, all Asians can move to Africa and Africans stay there because open borders and avoiding evil Whitey with our demon science.
He’s right about the Chinese though. People are only nice about them because of food. The food is terrible, you have bad taste America. Anytime someone says their favorite food is Chinese, you can ignore them. They eat cardboard with soy.

It’s true that India and China are fucked in unique ways. India will kill itself with the excess male population. China might go down with a fight but I don’t care as long as their cunty new millionaire ‘Princesses’ are sold to Islamic State.
The parents care about money and baby, it might happen.
Traps need bait.
If we want to conquer terrorism, feed them Chinese.
They have the biggest glut of population and no low-IQ excuse.
“Those Muslim groups that claim they will defeat the west by producing many more children paid for by full public assistance seem to understand this.”
That only works if you’re the minority sucking off the state. The ratio? They can’t do math.
Those ‘men’ bred from weak mothers will run off as soon as they’re expected to throw a punch. Notice they never do fist-fights? They’re cowards. Even suicide must be quick to them. The women will also leave but only after trying to whore themselves to dhimmi white men. We already see this with Indians because of their caste system, Muslim women also HATE (all caps) white beauty.
“Not to mention that major universities are shaming young white males for getting erections. Hillary kept warning about how the Pubs wanted to turn back the clock, but haven’t the Dems reinvented Victorianism?”
White men aren’t allowed to act black.
Case – closed.
“The green revolution prevented what would have otherwise been regular famines by now. The green revolution requires massive petroleum inputs to continue providing food for a global population of this size. It is not a sustainable proposition for the world population to continue growing. Perhaps the planet population peaking voluntarily is much better than the other alternatives.”
SANITY!
Let me love you!
Famines are cleanses for the colon of humanity.
“World population will never exceed 9 billion. … It can take less than 3 generations to become extinct.”
Shorter if you castrate and sterilize your enemies. History is fun.
That’s from the Muslim playbook!
“The big problem I see is plague. At a certain point of overpopulation, diseases start to spread, and that can be a really, really nasty way to solve the population problem.”
u r b a n l i v i n g
Such a misnomer.
These people can’t grow radishes.
“Once white people took up socialism they bought into its promises and they stopped having large families (who would have supported them if there was no government support). Add to this abortion and the pill and white people in America and Europe did not produce enough tax payers to support the socialist Ponzi scheme”
s e x u a l  r e v o l u t i o n

Promiscuity kills. Syphilis is coming back. There’s your zombie apocalypse. It rots your fucking face off. Your balls can literally drop off, like raisins. It’s like infective frostbite for your squishy bits.
It also makes the infected rabid. Insane. Sounds like a nice Apocalypse we got brewing.
If the sex-obsessed could be shipped off to an island and once sterilized, spend the rest of their lives fucking each other without medication, under the condition that they never bother the breeding population again or return, we’d ‘lose’ their genetics in a hundred years or so. And never have this issue again.

It’d be something incredulously disbelieved in history books. The Human Bonobos.
It’s like full drug legalization, that had a culling effect. Then after-WW2 only doctors could write prescriptions and we started getting more dross surviving. Let the bachelor alcoholics die in misery.
It’s a great example for the kids. Kids need negative role models, to see them suffer, more than any positive ones.

“There were 76 million people born between the years 1946 and 1964, the traditional window for the baby boom generation. That means that they will retire over a 19-year period. Simple math shows that 76 divided by 19 is 4 million, or almost 11,000 people a day. Say 1,000 die a day. The biggest event in America today is we have l0,000 Baby Boomers retiring each day for years to come. The biggest problem in America is we cannot for the duration support these retiring Baby Boomers. The reason we cannot support these baby boomers is we have not produced a large enough group of supporting taxpayers.”

Well the ones who didn’t have kids because they were too selfish won’t have anyone to defend them against the local marauder rapist gangs.

“Why are Muslims the primary people imported? Muslims don’t have abortions, take the pill and Muslim women are not single moms. It is not uncommon for Muslims to have the 6 to 10 children like white families used to have in America. Congress is counting on this group to generate the missing tax payers.”

Simply ban child brides and mutilation (circumcision removes incentive to be a slut). Pass them free contraception on the quiet, especially shots or implants while their father is away. Feminism will kill the Muslim, freedom isn’t for everyone.

Encourage every Muslim to become SJW. The Unis are doing this already.

Corrosive pop culture will westernize them, fund some Rihanna. Technically they are single mothers since there is a paternal failure to provide. They get disability which matches the IQ, a great excuse to boot them wherever we like. This is assuming they don’t place the dhimmi SJWs in the old Nazi camps once they become useless.

Possible.

“Why is America a bankrupt government? Revenue from current taxes is too low to pay for increasing entitlements and retirees. Deficits and debt plug the entitlement hole until immigrants produce enough taxes to fill the entitlement hole . Government is betting immigrants will produce the taxes to pay for retiring Baby Boomers before America goes belly up. Once the U.S. world reserve currency runs out and the government can no longer print bucket loads of money and debt they will strip the U.S. citizens cupboards bare to keep going.”

You can’t tax work that doesn’t happen.
They immigrate to make more money than they wish to provide the state.
You’ve been played.
I was once told, as many others “you’re entitled to NOTHING, nothing you didn’t earn. And that becomes yours, nobody else can give it or take it away.” The last part was naive but hearing entitlements makes me wanna reach for a hammer.

‘”Overpopulation” is not a problem, nor will it ever be. The global population will never exceed 9 billion, for which this planet is amply capable of sustaining. Paul Erlich predicted overpopulation would lead to human extinction by 1990. Real world studies have shown that this is not possible. Overpopulation is just another scare tactic by the left.’

Has a point, they only ever say breeding is a problem when whites do it, eh?

Guess the race. You can’t check, but it’s manospherian PUA rapist logic at work, you can totally guess.

“Why do you even *care* about what’s going on with Africans in AFRICA? They aren’t trying to rob you or sleep with your daughters or sign up for foodstamps. Yet that’s what is being discussed. If they want to have tons of babies, chuck spears, eat each other why do you care? They’re not doing it here, there doing it 1000’s of miles away from you.

Let’s face it; you poor put upon (mostly) white men need to stop crying about shit that doesn’t concern you. You whine about the pitifully small entitlements minorities get but most entitlements go to white people. And the biggest amount aren’t even called that — they’re called bailouts. Trillions of dollars to rich white bankers. But you focus on some poor black woman living in a dangerous ghetto, barely scraping by. You bunch of asshole, racist hypocrites. You’re the ones who created this mess, not the minorities who don’t have any power in this society.
Worry about your own limp, viagra dependent penises and stop worrying about what africans are doing with theirs.”

‘OMG why do you care about your genetic kin? Why do you CAAAARE? Always the same YYYYYY-ine.
Just let them be raped! They want that masculinity, running away is part of the ‘Game’!
They don’t want you White Man! Step aside and let the real men gang rape them! Celebrate that your race will die! Don’t be racist! p.s. send more foreign aid, our Cousin Chuck needs a new child bride’

Those who gain from the Gravy Train lie about it.
(((white))) bankers was the best bit
They act like they’re scraping by, off their own money. Money to one outgroup is less to the ingroup. It is DEPRIVATION that is the trick to genocide. It’s demographic theft between any group, race, sex, age etc.
Tragedy of the commons looms large in immigration issues. Less for the natives, less for the earners.
when called out;

“The EU is allowing those people to come there — the Northern Africans are not forcing their way in. Just like the rich, white, powerful people are allowing Mexicans to flood this country: because they want them here. Why, I don’t know but those people are invited and if they don’t want to deal with their uncontrolled growth, just stop letting them in.”

Well shooting them in our territorial waters is no different than shooting them on the land itself.
It isn’t like the water is lava and landing means they get to claim on the state lottery complete with free blond Swedish girls bouncing on their balls. I do mean ‘girl’. They’re disgusting parasites, that’s why their home country doesn’t want them. The NGO-fat lawyers run out of money and it’s down to local justice.
“Africa’s overpopulation ISN’T GOING TO STAY IN AFRICA”
We should teach them how to get to America and end in Canada. They want them, right?
Make lots of Little Congos?
Africa doesn’t cease to exist because you’re too blind to include their chart in your GLOBAL economic calculations.
It’s like studying STDs and missing the brothel down the street because Cindy gives you free BJs once a week.
Whatever it is, not science!
If they TALK about Africa, they have to DO something about Africa. They fear the NGOs. The right-wing is missing this.
Cameron promised to bonfire the Quangos (NGOs), voted in and suddenly went silent and got very cucked.
It isn’t specific charities like Greenpeace. Cui bono? Follow the money. Always, always NGOs!
Government will eat the People or People will kill the NGOs bribing Government. Simple.
“It is very simple, reduce the cost of government to every citizen and the population will increase if there is enough room available to be comfortable.Skinner and many other psychologists have demonstrated this principle with rats. Make a rat town, don’t overcrowd it, provide food that has to be worked for and reproduction will be normal for the species. Reduce the food or make it harder to get and the reproduction will decline.
Put the right amount of rats in a rat city and they will get along with each other and stick with raising a family and finding food. Put in too many rats and attacks against other rats will commence. (every rat needs a certain amount of space and food) The more rats that are added the rat fights get deadlier and the reproduction declines. If you keep adding rats some rats will become psychotic and some will become psychopaths.
Nowadays the people who should be having children can’t afford them so they fiddle with their phones instead of their spouse or girl friend. Who do you think will have the most children; a couple on a farm or ranch who work from before sun-up until after sundown to get ahead or a couple of snowflakes who live in a crowded city with high rents working an 8 to 5 low paying menial job in a small office. The liberals have tried to move everyone into the cities since the 1960’s and maybe now they see the result. As long as the government moves people into the cities and burdens them with high rents, high food prices and high taxes and little living space that population will not grow.”
“only the smarts will have jobs”
money*
only the high-IQ will have money
make money, keep money
Why do they think the productive keep a census? It’s a list of citizens.

The Left has committed hari-kari. It’s Mike the Headless Chicken.
It’s dead but it hasn’t stopped being a fucking nuisance yet.
If you don’t breed, you’re like the dodo or the panda, on the dead side of history.

Cultural Marxism’s pets are coming home to roost and they’re hungry.

Let the animals eat the zookeeper. It’s nature, they’re pacifists, let it happen.
Don’t help them. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

You see a feminist being beaten up by a Muslim Sharia Patrol?

You go, Girl!

You can’t match the objectification of Olga, who doesn’t have a brain… or a head.
http://www.stufftoblowyourmind.com/blogs/behold-headless-woman.htm
Yes, it’s an illusion.

The Left is already totally irrelevant. The end of liberalism and the beginning of fascist bannings.
When you make speech laws like the Inquisition’s blasphemy code in a democracy, people just stop talking to you because they don’t want to go to prison. They also stop listening and talk among themselves.
The internet is a symptom not the cause.
Lefties never go to pubs, all the best political conversation isn’t happening in cock-tail bars.
They choose to socially exclude themselves from the working class, and SJW-ism is just pissing on the working class.

We recently decided the best way to fuck with the Left is never have a conversation with them. Play dumb as they think we are, ignore them and move away to other things and people as they speak. Distract them, cut them off, reduce signalling to nil value. They get louder and more virulent in their sedition, openly calling for the end of white people and heterosexuality, it’s funny if it weren’t horrifying. This is happening in the media writ large but it began socially, first with SJW topics and slowly into the economic. We don’t want advice from someone with a trust fund, which, btw, they will lose.

Nobody deserves to be poor but an SJW.

Anytime you see a leftie, be grey. Greyman protocol. Swim in the crowd. They are looking for righties to trigger at and relieve their anxiety. Block them from social media if they get uppity and try to info-gather. Use the same echo chamber stuff on them but only agaisnt them.
They want a target, they want families to break up and teenagers to shout at. They want someone to blame.
Give them nothing. They grew up on empty praise and attention.
Silence, the yawn of being ignored, is HELL, it is torture to the narcissist.
They are forced to turn on the fellow middle-class, exposing the Beast of their rage, or else one another. It was a matter of time.
Do not engage. We have won the debate based on the elections, the Overton window is ours and there is no debate to be had with ‘hate speech’ for science and people who refuse common sense or rules of evolution, logical. Listening to them gives them the public platform. They can’t buy eyeballs or ears. Do not give them and observers the respect of a peer.
They want to end you and your way of life. Let them starve, go Galt on attention whores.

K-shift is coming, friends.

The eternal r-type

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/unbelievable-mother-of-15-kids-somebody-needs-to-pay-somebody-needs-to-be-held-accountable_12012011

for the Title alone

“Somebody needs to pay! Somebody needs to be held accountable!”

comment

“At what number of children does a woman loose her ‘reproductive rights’ to bring even more children into this world that she is unable to care for? Why are you and I ‘forced’ to support children that we had no part in creating? I had no part in the pleasure of any of the orgasms required to create these children …… so why am I required to support them and their mother?
I am informed that here in Florida, the grandmother of the children will go to DCF and allege that her daughter is unfit to care for and raise her grandchildren. Once the mother is declared “unfit”, then the grandmother will gain legal custody of the children and then become their “foster parent”. This changes the whole nature of the situation from a welfare issue to a foster care issue. Grandma can then collect approximately 2.5X more as a foster care provider than her daughter can receive as a welfare recipient.
At this point, the daughter moves back in with her mother and her children and they all live happily after ….. at our expense. How about after the delivery of two welfare babies we also provide the mother with a tubal ligation; at our expense of course. To be completely fare about the whole thing, we also give the father a free vasectomy.
Food for thought homies. Too cold on my part?”

This sex-positive Sexual Revolution propaganda is all about dem dollars.

It’s a wealth transfer to the immature dependents (high time pref) from the actual adults (low time pref). The productive are being vampirised for the leeches, that’s why they can’t afford to breed themselves!

You have a ‘right’ to breed as many children as you like, under our construct of consensual=moral, but you do not have a right to force others to pay for it. At most, your own relations ought to pay for them, not strangers. I find it funny the men complaining about free birth control are the ones (sluts) who benefit from it, they never want to shut down free STD clinics or the abortion clinics, do they?

Replacement-level only is too generous, one child only. You need to breed those genes OUT.
The old rule was all those claiming any welfare go on birth control OR forsake all right to support for any child they produce while claiming.

“This angers me because I remember trying not to cry when I went in for my tubal ligation. We wanted more kids but knew in our hearts we couldn’t afford more. We stopped at three, wanted five originally. It was hard but I figured if I was ever in a position to truly support another lil guy then I could afford a reversal or in vitro. Made sense to me then, makes sense to me now. I don’t regret it because I know my kids would have less if I had been emotional and selfish.

And then to think of the poor couples who can’t have any at all! Really makes me sick. And more and more people have no responsibility for thier actions in any way anymore. I have to wonder, if there were no such thing as welfare, would she have had all those kids?”

It hurts other, better women most of all, the ones who keep their legs shut.

In a way, it’s deeply sexist against K-women. We have a shorter breeding period where we’re forced to pay for welfare trash babies instead of saving for our own.

“Let’s be fair…
Norplant as long as you are on welfare.
Once you start on welfare no more children are added to the payouts.
You lose the right to vote as long as you are on welfare.
to collect welfare you need to turn in the father with a DNA test to prove it.
So if you are down on your luck you get help, and if you turn your life around you get to have as many children as you want, vote, and collect child support from dad(s)”

Why should anyone’s sex life (lifestyle choice) be subsidized by the taxpayer?

The assumption nobody ever attacks.

There is no such thing as a human right to orgasms.

You have no right to a sex life, especially at the expense of others. This goes from free contraception to rape. Within marriage, you have a right to sex. That is literally the ‘conjugal right‘. You don’t have conjugal rights over anyone you’re not married to. That’s the real issue, they refuse to marry.

They want all the perks of marriage: sex, children, financial providence but no obligations or responsibilities.

In a patriarchy, it’s always the father’s responsibility as the provider, this is more a paternal failure but the women are almost as bad. Simply extract all the mother’s costs from the father, or he can work it off in prison. That’s the only way to do this, the traditional way.

Without promiscuity culture, this would never have happened.

Social shame would have prevented it but who wants to name the Beast of lust? All both parents want is ‘fun’.

They had sex knowing the biological consequence. You are taught this before puberty. You can have ‘fun’ in a thousand other ways or take up a masturbation habit if orgasms are so core to your self-esteem. Too much sex and the wrong sex (out of marriage, with strangers) is bad for your body and mind. It’s also common sense. There is NO such thing as ‘casual sex’. It has one, clear outcome.

comment
“If you can’t feed em, don’t breed em.”
“The bitch and her bastards belong in the gas chamber.”
“How’s about the Dads pay and you keep your legs together. I don’t owe you anything.”

If anything, they owe society.

In these cases, it’s always unfair to blame only the mother when it takes two to horizontal tango.
Always ask: where’s the father?

comment on a previously linked article, relevant
Long before you start saving money for your own kids, you pay for someone else’s. Get some single mother’s kid set up with toys, clothes and food and THEN you can start putting aside some money for your OWN kid, but not before. First some brown kid somewhere gets a Tonka truck, new jeans, KFC, ice cream sandwiches with your money. See what’s left, stick it in the piggy bank for your kid. Fuck it.”

The welfare system is unjust.

Our future is stolen.

Link: On pathology of low birthrates, explained

From the HBD side, both Anonymous Conservative and Jayman have previously agreed that the low birth rate of liberals is a feature and not a bug. The former from the perspective of low child-rearing in r-selection and the latter from genetics and, I guess, Malthus?

It’s connected, r-type extinction events are Malthusian in nature.

Obviously, the PC practice of pathological altruism (there is an academic book of that title on the subject) is applying ingroup evolved mechanisms to depress the ingroup birthrate and increase the outgroup based on the largesse of state theft. It’s a combination of resource reparations and treacherous (if not suicidal and insane) genocide, by the post-WW2 original definitions, already linked here.

http://shylockholmes.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/on-pathology-of-low-birthrates.html
~tuts in Social Darwinism~

A selection of neat lil quotes.

“But even people who think about this when it comes to profit and organisations often don’t think about the equivalent for ideas and cultural practices.
To wit: if you want a culture or idea to survive, the people who practice it must have high birth rates…
Because ideas, like most things in this world, are heritable. Both genetics and culture mean that parents in general pass their values on to their children. Take away the children, and you take away the people likely to hold the idea tomorrow.
Of course, people are apt to forget this, because it’s a slow-moving effect. The faster way ideas spread is through communication across a given population.

requires homogeneity and a culture of respect for received wisdom, interrupted in the 20th century, when all the major fault-lines started showing

Which is all well and good. The more you spread the idea, the more people who hold it right now, and, ceteris paribus, the more people will hold it next generation…..”

Richard Dawkins did not advance the idea of a meme.

It was Darwin.

The ‘gene’ is an idea of transmitted information, it is not limited to the biological, it is symbolic theory nor limited to precise ranges of biological material. That is a 20th century use based on chemical experiments to ‘crack’ human DNA using computers.
‘Origin of the Species’ should be on school reading lists. It isn’t because it’s accurate and unPC. Many science teachers aren’t qualified to explain it either, knowing nothing about say, farming or animal breeding, which are used in examples. You need life experience to explain life.

Meanwhile, the intelligent are either at home or in the wider workforce.

Later, on progressivism, political correctness, social justice warrior feminism etc…
Feminism in particular needs a constant fresh crop of young women far more than Patriarchy.

Anti-natal ideologies are parasitic on the host’s reproductive potential, it cripples more surely than Polio. Just look at abortion and anything labelled Cultural Marxism, it’s dysgenic, it’s a society-killer. Just like there are no centuries-old atheist or multicultural societies, these things do not have any survivability or, in PC terms, sustainability (really longevity, they don’t stand up to the scrutiny of history). The ‘right side of history’ rhetoric assumes humans have innately changed within a few generations and the old rules no longer apply.

Why? They are ‘fat and happy’ for the first time in human history. If you look up the history of mankind, we are not designed for this surplus unless our behaviours are prosocial and good for fitness of our ‘family’, genetic kin. (To love your neighbour had always previously meant distant genetic kin). However, charity has murdered the West as well as it has Africa, the fighting spirit and much of the independence and creativity has gone, the intellectual thirst died with candy. A little hunger if we fell behind on bills without welfare or some reliable religious fasting kept us sharp, there are plenty of studies that demonstrate health benefits, epigenetics is coming in, microbiome improvements AND the cognitive spectrum from starvation to gluttony, each with particular traits. Could it have been a sin because it leads to a decadent mind? Perhaps. Too much of a good thing is a very, very bad thing. All these anti-obesity efforts that blame the wrong thing (it isn’t fat, it’s carbs) and increase the price of basic foodstuffs (see CPI and how starvation includes malnutrition, with the lower nutrient profile of mass-produced food) and THAT is a superior explanation for K-shift and the so-called ‘rise of conservatism’ like a tidal wave.

Bread and circuses.

The deepest self-loathing is genetic suicide, the notion you don’t deserve to live – into the next generation.

All surviving religions have a pro-natal credo. This is not a coincidence.

I like these old-type posts but feel I’m explaining why water is wet.

SI

If you’re searching for dysgenic factors or variables to trigger suicidal liberals.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/18/practically-why-is-the-left-dead/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/05/20/21st-century-economics-are-making-millennials-infertile/

World War Three?

You might think this is an eerie kind of fanfiction…

it is not.

Just bear with me here. Listen a little. 2,000 words.

What if the EEC, later known as the European Union, were in fact part of a long line of Empires? A chain stretching back into Ancient times? Now, every kind of society has a maximum size, and various points of failure, like a building.

The function of each of these Empires is simple – labour. Slavery in its brutal form but productivity nonetheless.

The only means by which this can operate is control. A series of levers and social ‘memes’ that keep the whole machine ticking over, because humans must be entertained. It’s not bread and circuses, it’s hot dogs and reality TV. Consider every Empire, by size or density of its population, an experiment. A living experiment with humans much like Calhoun’s rats.

With the same dismal end.

You could relate this to the circling of the degenerate drain known as r-selection.

I’m afraid it’s a little broader than that, you’d need HBD, biohistory and various other theories including psychiatry for a complete picture.

For example, I covered the probable role of syphilis and especially neurosyphilis in the formative modern history of the West. Then there comes the obvious selection pressures of war, Black Death and various toxins, released deliberately in many cases.

The Romans probably fell in IQ due to the cumulative brain damage of lead in their piping.

The Victorians later had problems with cholera.

Basic sanitation is a key vector of disease transmission, ironically. This would relate to water fluoridation in the modern water supply, I’ve linked to its neurotoxic state, acknowledged in science.

Population control can also be achieved by sterilizing STDs, the most recent being Ebola in that is sterilizes via death. Before that, the mysterious origins of HIV and the unusual number of strains, including those tested by militaries. Naturally, this would only work if you pushed some kind of Sexual Revolution to increase the transmission potential but kept it low for your own group.

I’m getting off topic. Let’s keep to certain facts.

Each Empire was doomed to fall, based on its sheer volume of inhabitants.

This is a rule of history.

The EU has already failed based on metrics alone. Its currency has failed.

With the Euro gone, there is nothing to prop it up.

Even the human labour doesn’t exist in both the numbers and the quality (IQ) required. The fall of the EU isn’t an achievement so much as inevitability. The dysgenics put in place for the world wars guaranteed any such plan was doomed.

Much like taxation of the wealthiest (most productive within a year), you can only push so far because people break. They’ve long been suffering the slow death of inflation. This changes a person, it alters the amygdala at least. People seem less polite, more crass and less content with whatever comforts or luxuries their money buys them.

Social power never existed, it’s a polite post-war lie to cover armament for military might.

Considering all of these facts, how can I explain recent events?

Russia is not the danger. The USA is a defanged hound.

It’s China.

A war with MENA is good for the money-lenders, based entirely on the resources found there and nowhere else. How dare those pesky locals demand to be paid for what’s in their country?

Hence, open borders aka NO borders.

It’s Communism with other nation’s resources.

A war with China, however… they don’t believe China has the balls.

Oh, it does. It’s been preparing since WW2 for the next match.

It produces most goods in the world. How quickly would it win, owning all the equipment? They understood Marx well, you cannot produce tanks without a Means of Production.

This isn’t by any stretch all. To keep this short.

There are many economic unions in the world. Only the EU gets attention.

They are temporary alliances, that shall evaporate upon trial.

Nobody wants to upset China, because they’ve been selling their people’s labour at the price of slaves. To foreigners, no less! Some of the most racist people in the world! But why?

As part of a long-term plan to overthrow the West using capitalism, its own invention. Capitalism’s weakness is the honesty of white men, also why ‘free trade’ is BS. Other races prize lying to outsiders, whether you call it taqiyya or etiquette, where they suddenly stop inviting you round if you get fired. The people who seem most polite are lying, they’re hiding something.

It’s been gagging for this shot since the Industrial Revolution, and two world wars weakened us all nicely.

To sacrifice a few generations in the name of their collectivism, indulge in the West goodies but be not of it. To send some r-types overseas to settle and become key figures in politics (this is happening in America as we speak, a Red tide rises) and I already linked to the Economist ages ago predicting WHEN, not IF, but when China will overtake the US economy.

Most people would read that and go back to crying in their cornflakes about feminism.

It’s all connected. Would there be any Yellow Fever, without anime porn?

Would Western men who think they’re too smart for Hollywood porn, be so useless and lotus-eating, like the parasite single (bachelor) men of Japan, without it?

Back to the economy. When any country becomes a dominant power, it gets to play world police aka start as many wars as it likes.

Ask yourself: Is China more bloodthirsty than the US?

Has it dogmatically enforced its own culture, unlike the USA?
Has it tortured its own people to achieve?
Which tries to be the fairer?

What are the signs, you ask?

They learn Western culture e.g. the violin, religiously, to blend in.

But they do not expand the canon.

They punish their children to achieve at any cost, and top the league tables.

This allows them access to the prestige western schools, to befriend future politicians and observe any blackmail material firsthand.

What does a war need? Money and bodies.

Well, there’s a story that they could march all their fighting age men and encircle the world. They have the largest self-sustained population in the world. An excess of men. Anyone read on history knows there is only one means to get rid of a surplus of men. Who can sustain greater losses, all of the West or China?

OK, but what about one baby as a rule?

Why did they make that rule? They knew in their culture it would lead to a surplus of men. Why would a government obsessed with military investment need a huge stock of men to outnumber their main capitalist competition? They’re being trained, and not in factories.

Asia is obsessed with STEM and the military.

Why? Well, engineers and doctors are the two occupations critical to any war effort.

Ideally, you want to train your people overseas, use up their resources while building connections to exploit as informants later, and then extract them back home, depriving the enemy of key workers to subsistence peace-time level.

Gee, which race has a near-monopoly on those two occupations?

But people who read foreign papers will know they changed the baby rule recently.

Again, I ask you.

Why?

Two babies. This is interesting. It means the fighting age culled population will have sufficient females (baby 2) to breed with. It all fits.

The Marxism of China still encourages child-bearing, but the grandparents retain a prominent role to care unlike the West aka Baby Boomers.

People have been spoiling for a war since the 80s, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, all just paper targets.

There are many economic unions and these libertarian experiments (inc. the EU) are, whether they know it or not, pawns in a wider game, the leagues before WW3. You need the upper hand before the game starts, and that’s why nobody wants to start it. The US is not the strongest player, it’s the UK because we can push the US based on our unique geography and naval supremacy. However, the US doesn’t know which enemy will rise up next, or believes in arrogance nobody will dare challenge it (naive) based on two wars it lucked out of. They can’t attack everyone.

That’s why Hitler lost.

Russia and China are in an economic alliance together, I forget which one. The US is not.

That is why both Russia and China have been buying up gold.

You only need that for one thing as a nation.

A gold standard.

China has been faking its gold exports, look up the ones pictured with a Panda hallmark.

Why do that? Aren’t they our friends?

They’ve been taking over cyberspace too. Most hacks now come from Asia, not Russia.

Why need gold practically? It can be used in electronics, especially high-tech war equipment.

They have a lot of men to equip.

If they run out, they can always use some older women. Thanks, feminism!

If China announces it’s moving to a gold standard, the USA will be forced to default.

I believe this may be the black swan you’ve all been looking for?

The EU is backed by the IMF, whose traders include Deutsche Bank, close to open failure.

Like Lehman Brothers in 2007.

UK gilts are bought off the backs of nothing, you’re supposed to trade heavily in gilts during times of war. As in, we’re fuck out of options.

The bubbles accruing on top one another for decades, sped up since ’08, will go at once like dominos. Where do we owe this money, ultimately? Not so much the Jews, although yes historically. All roads lead to China, they keep buying up Western debt, ostensibly for ‘social power’ and out of the goodness of their commie little hearts.

I wonder if we can learn anything about massive indebtedness from the Weimar Republic.

These people poison their own baby formula and don’t withdraw it from the market. They don’t care about one another (beyond direct blood relations) and they hate us.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/china-shipping-human-flesh-cans-8217761

Russia wants to be able to trade with them. This requires gold. People like Putin watch commodities over the Forex.

I don’t often talk shop or economics but this next piece is illustrative.

What’s the immigration rate of China?

So, if a series of riots were to take place based on new, entitled ‘citoyenne’ … we’d be too busy dealing with civil war (4th generation) to consider the mere possibility of another.

Does Crimea make more sense now?

How about in light of the fact that China’s greatest enemy, the Japanese, are being antagonized by North Korea as China’s bitch?

Why do that on their behalf, draw fire like that?

It doesn’t many any sense. If you’re too close to the people who hold a grudge like the Middle Eastern population only with slightly more common sense.

Which countries have retained their culture, yet appeared right-on to embrace multiculturalism?

Even Israel can’t claim that, they’re losing key demographic territory to Palestine. They’re over. Finished.

China, meanwhile, has about a billion. It can afford espionage, brain drain to export and cuddle up to the natives.

It spreads all sorts of rumours about how superior their women are, truly feminine (fake).

India will side with whoever pays them, it has a surplus of men, China has been purchasing Africa in such a ballsy colonialist move I’m astounded nobody has mentioned it.

Africa is key territory for manufacturing weapons. That’s why British Empire.

Natural resources, vital elements.

I do know more, much more, but alas, I can’t really say atm. This is all quite easy to check. The Red Scare is aimed at the wrong target, the Russians are broadly white, Christian and share our culture, including our art.

Who retains their own ‘art’ but appropriates Western culture down to our clothes and eyelids?

..Who sells the dinghies to the ‘refugee’ invasion?

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2093030/rickety-boats-used-smuggle-migrants-europe-made-china

http://www.reuters.com/article/europe-migrants-china-idUSL4N1I62PD

CHINA.

I’ll drop this for now. I’ve been working on these premises for a long time, they’re accurate. I am still here and still thinking, just longer term than the stark majority of shitposters.

Look around. All I ask of you.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/08/21/chinese-ships-planes-hold-war-games-sea-japan.html

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/05/08/Chinese-coast-guard-sails-near-Japans-Okinawa-Senkaku-Islands/5641494268445/

I’ll just leave these here. No reason. It’s all a coincidence.
http://www.thetower.org/article/chinas-deepening-interest-in-israel/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/israel-china-relations/
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/israel-china-relations
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2080572/china-and-israel-vow-deepen-relations
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-investment-israel-idUSKBN187080?il=0
“”China’s international surge of state-driven investments in emerging technologies should put the United States and our allies on notice,””
“”Once we became a portfolio company of these Chinese investors, they helped with opening doors in China … where the business community really relies on connections you build there.””
“”We are not worried to take Chinese money over U.S. money,” said Bar-Zeev of IronSource. “If you can deliver, there are endless opportunities.””
The EU is a distraction. The future flag is…

The G8 is nothing.

Alliances are everything.

Video: The story of your enslavement

10/10 would share again. Shop around.

[read after]

Molyneux is the only redpill that hasn’t shamed himself with degeneracy.

Breath of fresh air.

The question you’re not allowed to ask:
Who are the farmers?
There is a social contract of slavery. As soon as you are born, there is a price on your head. What you’re told you owe society. It’s called national debt and ‘we’ can’t even pay the interest. It’s a con. You never agreed to it. This is why people are giving up. There is no fairness or incentive. The system is rigged via the devalued currency.
It’s the scientific model of management, Fordism. They’ll be nice to you, because it keeps you docile. They’ll tell you they care, because it means you’ll behave. They’ll promise you the world, if you work. Which is real? Only the work is real. Communists and capitalists come from largely the same stance, with inverted conclusions. The capitalist wants to be his own boss in this system. The Communist wants to be his own boss, self-employed, direct his own labour, in another system. Each believes they can maximize utility in their chosen system. Overall, there is hardly any difference in what they want – to keep what they earn. But from which State? Marxists think the State cares for them, but Marx wanted to destroy the middle-class, not the owners they are uniquely  empowered to oppose, and he never went into politics. Politicians are rich. They pay themselves above minimum wage and then flout that law to hire illegals. At least the capitalists are somewhat honest about those Homo Economicus motivations. The key difference is theft. Capitalists say enough has happened, wise to how shitty this system is but hopeful about improvement, at least for individuals who…work hard, Communists want more theft, to put the shoe on the other foot and get The Man tomorrow. Who will enforce this? The angry mob? No, they aren’t intelligent. The Man will never force measures against The Man. I alluded this in “Best Post“.

The only thing they care about is what they can take. They can’t take something you haven’t produced. This is a generational strike. Millennials (and younger) won’t get these goodies. There is no bribe, it’s fucking Monopoly money, fairground tickets for broken rides. But we’re still held responsible for governments and debts we weren’t alive to vote for. That’s illegal, it cannot be forced in either case. The system was damned long before we were born. We are not responsible. We cannot save it, nobody can ‘save’ it and they shouldn’t want to. Those people with the power to do anything are dead (they did manage to take it with them, in experiences and hedonism) or at the top of the chain, they don’t see it as a ‘problem’ to fix, a feature, not a bug. Intergenerational betrayal, and the young will live to see it.

Hey, I have been trying to warn people. I’m not alone in this. Why the maybe passive approach?
They control you with lies. It isn’t for public sector pensions, unfunded liabilities – it’s for the children! It isn’t for the whore down the road who you wouldn’t buy a drink, let alone the lifestyle of contraception, it’s for Family Planning! It isn’t for the ingrates in other countries who try to kill us, it’s for the foreign poor! Lions do not own lions because there would be a fight, eventually. We call this empire collapse. However, humans can own humans if they lie about why.

What are you working for? Which system is it, you support? Are you free to say ‘no’, openly, to your owners?

First lie: Who rules over you? Do you know? Do you know their names? Are you allowed to know?
Second lie: Who writes the textbooks? Are you taught the controversies, all moral sides or the Official Party Line? Who decides what is true for the poor, who attend state schooling?
Third lie: What is your currency? What is your value? Does money give you that? Does office paper? Gold? Food? Where is your value? External or internal? Who lies about this? Who says, in effect, ‘you need us, so you’d better behave’ or ‘toe the line, or you’ll be sorry’? Is that not a threat?
Fourth lie: Do the government do things on your behalf, in your name, without asking? Is that a democracy? Do they do the opposite from what they promised? Isn’t this… fraud? Do you even know what they’re doing? Why not tell you?
Fifth lie: Do they divide you from your kin? Isn’t this a distraction? Didn’t this start with preschool, when they told your family to abandon you (causing known psychiatric damage) to the state schooling system? Do you ‘defend’ groups you do not belong to? So… who defends you? Are you allowed to defend yourself?

It is Reverse Psychology and a fair amount of gaslighting (the true purpose of propaganda, doubt your own mind and they run it, in effect). The State tells you that you are worthless, from birth. Without you, they have nothing. They produce nothing. The state is innately parasitic.
Are you allowed or encouraged to succeed, or shamed and guilt-tripped? Isn’t this abuse? In a relationship, wouldn’t this be domestic abuse? Coming the state, isn’t that propaganda? Are you allowed ambition or achievement? Or, whatever you manage to scrape together from these seeds, do you get told ‘you didn’t build that’? Did someone else file those papers, grow those crops and study for those grades?
If they couldn’t profit from their ‘policies’, they wouldn’t push them. Who is held responsible for their failure? Those who created them and promised results (fraud) in academia? The politicians who wrote them into law? Or is the general public called the failure, since nobody is allowed to question anything else? Look to the second question.
Who has the power? The rich? Are they the same thing? What about the bribed? The workers keeping the system going? Who could improve the system? Who runs it? This relates to the first question.
Who claims to be one of you, but drags you down? Who are the crabs in the bucket making you hopeless? Calling you worthless, like the system itself?
What do they promise? What’s the alternative? ‘Bad things might happen‘ – how does that rationale differ from the Boogeyman? This is used on adults, mind.
The ‘arts’ is a good example of unofficial welfare. If you don’t want to see a play, why should you pay actors and co. for a play you’re never going to see? Why should middle-class hobbies be subsidized? Why not football matches? Why not bread and circuses? Who gets priority? Why? Which information do the arts convey to the public, how can they control the proles that the other hobbies and leisure pursuits do not?

How did this happen? Democracy is a good idea but has certain prior conditions that must be met e.g. population homogeneity, industry, longevity. When people step over the line and survive, there is no line. Find the crime without a punishment. People should have freedom, the State (a press-gang of a minority of bullies over the majority People) should never, they must be servants limited by necessity and mutual agreement. That is capitalism as an idea, some libertarianism without the globalism.

Instead, think of the ultimate minority group: the elite. Have some sympathy with the champagne socialists. Someone’s gotta crush the grapes, might as well be yours.

Denial is psychologically easier than dealing with it, they’re primed (the real subliminal effect, look it up) to be immature – less grit, lower impulse control, shorter attention spans than previous generations. We were bred to be weak by the State. Like Carlin said, just smart enough to run the machines but never to question why. We didn’t cause this mess, but this is how we live now. We must deal with it.
In a crisis, there is a normalcy bias. People will walk around as though nothing is wrong. On a societal scale, this is ongoing. There are problems, but not the problems the State feeds and funds. I repeat myself. The State is the enemy of the People, whether it be a Communist or capitalist one. If every man is equal, there can be no judges, no politicians, no lawyers, no preachers, no teachers, every man must stand alone. If every man is equal and not an animal, why need a State?

You could simplify that K-types are producers, the little red hen baking the bread and r-types the swarming locust of consumers.

I wonder what lesson that holds for Ks, when the Malthusian trap, the demographic crunch (or economic correction of all the bubbles popping at once to make ’08 look like a child’s Frozen birthday party) snaps on us. It may not happen overnight, but in politics a week is a year. A few years this would take for the shit to trickle down, a few months tops.

The r-selected need a State because it steals the wealth they cannot, as it steals the wealth they cannot produce themselves. The K-selected, dwindling in number with a small, short boost recently, do not need a State. They use the State to connect with each other. That already existed in ancient times, the tribal business.

What is control, in these contexts? Who is controlling you?

Economics works by quintiles, and taxes from this (aka Who is rich?). If you wanna go the typical way, sure, ask WHO is the 1% and what do they have in common? But realistically, they maintain power as the 20%.

The people screeching about the 1% are doing damage control as false opposition. To have a platform in the first place, to have the MSM’s ear, they are the privileged 20%.

I posted this at the beginning of the year.

Good luck. We’re all going to need it. If you’ve read this far, I sincerely wish you well.